Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please

2009-05-12 Thread Lalit Dhiri


 Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:09:19 -0400
 From: philip.r.schaff...@nasa.gov
 To: centos-docs@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please




 Looks pretty overall.

 Just a style comment - but I'd enclose things like lspci and lsusb
 output in {{{ ... }}} markup.

 Better to point people to known repos than downloads, and it is highly
 discouraged to recommend source installs unless absolutely necessary.
 iwl4965-firmware and nvidia-x11-drv are available from RPMforge. Have
 you tried them?

 Phil

I could not get the Ethernet to work when I first installed 5.2 on the XPS 
M1530 so I chose to use the same route and made use of WiFi. I will try 
Ethernet with out making changes with 5.3 to see if things get going if not 
this is probably still the easiest route imho.

The last I checked the RPMForge nvidia-x11-drv were a lot older then the latest 
release and had issues with the graphics card. Again here I will see what the 
current release is on RPM Forge and provide reference.

For now I've added the following in Links  Notes: ** If after an install 
internet connection is possible; it may be an
easier option to get WiFi firmware and GPU drivers from RPMForge.
_
Share your photos with Windows Live Photos – Free.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665338/direct/01/
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 23:04 +0400, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
 Hello!
 
 I was advised by the forum moderator to ask for contribution:
 http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20223forum=38post_id=76546#forumpost76546
 
  My wiki login is VladislavRastrusny
 
 I would like to contribute for Tips  Tricks section with a small
 automated script to install webmin repository data and webmin itself
 from here: 
 http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20223forum=38post_id=76546#forumpost76546

I hate Webmin period. I like the scripted install though.

 And also I would like to contribute automated RPM forge repository
 installation script:
 http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=20222forum=38post_id=76525#forumpost76525
 after it will be checked by forum users and found to be error-free.

Hmm, I like that script also. But I have a slight problem. It or (Both)
should be in Python, Shell or Bash and not PHP. PHP in my opinion is
more of a web scripting language but I'm aware it can used in system
configuration also.

I myself on server installs would use scripts like this in %post in
Kickstart. Keep in mind file servers usually do not have PHP installed.
Python is always there because a majority of Administration Tools depend
on it.

JohnStanley


___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please

2009-05-12 Thread Ned Slider
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
 Good morning,
 
 Would anyone with CentOS Wiki experience consider giving feedback on the 
 state of my draft article at?
 
 http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/XPS_M1530
 
 I will be adding info ref Nvidia graphics card driver, hard drive Load Cycle 
 and hope to have the article completed later today or tomorrow assuming I've 
 not messed something up :-). For now off to boldly go where I've never been 
 before ;-)
 
 Have a good day and thanks for any comments.
 

The hardware looks very similar to the XPS M1330 here (other than you 
have the nVidia graphics option):

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/XPS_M1330?highlight=(1330)

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Link to Chinese translation in Wiki frontpage

2009-05-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
Timothy Lee wrote:
 That should not be a major issue, we have a couple of VM's that can be 
 thrown together for this sort of a thing. If you want to go ahead and 
 send me your ssh key, I can get the vm setup and get you access on there.
   
 OK, attached please find my SSH key.

Just on the topic of VM setup, we have some maint work going on with the 
platform that we use. Once that is done ( should be today ) I'll get 
this setup.

It would be good to have a wiki-devel sort of setup anyway, something we 
can perhaps keep up for situations like these.

- KB
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Vladislav Rastrusny
2009/5/12 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
 Noted. That would fit under Admin tricks and shell one-liners,
 wouldn't it?
Yes, I think this is the place because it is very simple and plain.

 Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
 Strange :)
Why strange ;) I think PHP is no worse than Perl. I think the choice
of scripting language for tools is up to the developer. I don't see
why bash or perl is better than php. At least php-cli is very easy to
be installed (just one yum command) and does not cause the threat to
the system security. Of course not all servers has it, but I prefer
PHP scripts because they are much easy to read and understand
comparing to Perl and Bash especially for novice users (I think
professionals have their own scripts for everything :) ).

 Oh, we'd all like that, but there is no such thing at the moment. You
 can get your own HomePage on the wiki :)
:) Ok, thank you ;)

 Oh, and please - put a bit more prose around the scripts, like what do
 do where and why (and why people should use the webmin.repo, what to
 watch out for, ...)
Ok, I will!
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please

2009-05-12 Thread Lalit Dhiri


 Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:53:35 +0100
 From: n...@unixmail.co.uk
 To: centos-docs@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please


 The hardware looks very similar to the XPS M1330 here (other than you
 have the nVidia graphics option):

 http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Dell/XPS_M1330?highlight=(1330)

Yeah may be; the key different areas are graphics card (Intel or other was not 
an option), Ethernet and WiFi which are issues as don't have full function 
until extra work is done...

Still got to look in to Bluetooth too as there appears to be no way of 
switching it on under CentOS :( or possibly Linux distros generally.

-- 
Lalit Dhiri
Linux the root to no GPFs

_
Beyond Hotmail — see what else you can do with Windows Live.
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/134665375/direct/01/
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] XPS1530 Draft Comments Please

2009-05-12 Thread Phil Schaffner
Lalit Dhiri wrote:
...
 I could not get the Ethernet to work when I first installed 5.2 on
 the XPS M1530 so I chose to use the same route and made use of WiFi.
 I will try Ethernet with out making changes with 5.3 to see if things
 get going if not this is probably still the easiest route imho.
 
 The last I checked the RPMForge nvidia-x11-drv were a lot older then
 the latest release and had issues with the graphics card. Again here
 I will see what the current release is on RPM Forge and provide
 reference.
 
 For now I've added the following in Links  Notes: ** If after an
 install internet connection is possible; it may be an easier option
 to get WiFi firmware and GPU drivers from RPMForge. 

That covers all my comments nicely.  Good work!

Phil

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread David Dreggors
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 
 Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
 Strange :)
 

Yes and No... to many of us it may seem odd, we all know that shell 
scripting is faster and way more powerful than php. We also know that 
one could accomplish the same thing in half the lines and that this 
script would be able to go on ANY CentOS install with no problems using 
a shell script.

On the other hand, you use what you know. Bourne Shell/Bash/(t)csh/etc 
may be too much for some. Perl is definitely a hard language to grasp as 
well. Php is easy to pick up. Not to mention that there are many that do 
not realize that php-cli can accomplish this. It maybe an unknown art 
that some find interesting and useful. Not php as a whole but rather 
using php on the command line.

Either way, seems like it fits well in a tips and tricks area, because 
it is a trick that not many would expect... think about all our 
reactions when he suggested it!
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Vladislav Rastrusny
Yes, I agree ;)
The problem is that I am not familiar with this language ;)

2009/5/12 William L. Maltby centos4b...@triad.rr.com:

 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 15:23 +0400, Vladislav Rastrusny wrote:
 2009/5/12 Ralph Angenendt ra+cen...@br-online.de:
 snip

  Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
  Strange :)
 Why strange ;) I think PHP is no worse than Perl. I think the choice
 of scripting language for tools is up to the developer. I don't see
 why bash or perl is better than php. At least php-cli is very easy to
 be installed (just one yum command) and does not cause the threat to
 the system security. Of course not all servers has it, but I prefer
 PHP scripts because they are much easy to read and understand
 comparing to Perl and Bash especially for novice users (I think
 professionals have their own scripts for everything :) ).

 And another thing professionals consider is the scope of coverage. *If*
 you want the widest application, you consider the tolls available on the
 targets of your effort. If certain of those targets are unlikely to have
 your preferred language on it, you can reduce your targets or choose a
 language that is more likely to be available on your targets.

 For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.

 snip

 --
 Bill

 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] Comments? HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID

2009-05-12 Thread Ed Heron
From: Ed Heron, Tuesday, May 05, 2009 2:16 PM

  My first draft of http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID is
 complete.

  Please, give it a once or thrice over and let me know what you think.

  I didn't go into too much detail with some steps.  If you think a 
 specific
 step needs more explanation, let me know.

  Has anybody had a chance to look at this?

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 12 May 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:

 Okay. I'm waiting for comments here - php as a scripting language?
 Strange :)

not at all -- have used it for years; did a LUG presentation 
as well.  It can live well in the inittab and run as a daemon 
process for very rapid prototyping.
http://www.colug.net/notes/0208mtg/

-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Comments? HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID

2009-05-12 Thread Ed Heron
haven't yet, but will do so later today. And if nobody complains, hey,
it probably is a good article :)

Ralph

  Either that or I've hit a target nobody is interested in...

  OK.  It's a great article and nobody has any suggestions or problems... 
I'm batting 1000...  yeah, that.

  Thanks.

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:

 For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.

curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
/bin/sh
in my script's shebang   ;)

-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
 On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
 
  For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
 
 curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
   /bin/sh
 in my script's shebang   ;)

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr  1 17:17 /bin/sh - bash

As it should be. In my experience, most admins set this to the preferred
shell interpreter (csh, bash, ...). That, of course, leads to possible
incompatibilities. In my shells, I use /bin/bash. This works most places
if I'm targeting GNU systems.

IMO, if you code shell to the lowest common denominator (avoiding very
useful shell-specific syntax and functionality) you can achieve wide
coverage. But then the level of knowledge needed goes up (must have
familiarity with multiple shell interpreters - csh, bash, ksh, ...) so
as to avoid shell specificity.

Not many of us have been around long enough to have had exposure to
those differences, and even if we have, how much have we forgotten?
Reading the man pages to refresh oneself is such a drag!  :-(

 
 -- Russ herrold
 snip sig stuff

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:


 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:

 For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
 curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
  /bin/sh
 in my script's shebang   ;)

 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr  1 17:17 /bin/sh - bash

 As it should be.

The use of a link is not a statement that /bin/sh behaves as 
bash;  the interpreter notes how it was called, and acts to 
the shell dialect restrictions chosen by how it is invoked.

-- Russ herrold
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Vladislav Rastrusny
I didn't mean to start a holy war here! ;) Bash is also ok ;)

2009/5/12 R P Herrold herr...@centos.org:
 On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:


 On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:

 For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
 curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
      /bin/sh
 in my script's shebang   ;)

 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr  1 17:17 /bin/sh - bash

 As it should be.

 The use of a link is not a statement that /bin/sh behaves as
 bash;  the interpreter notes how it was called, and acts to
 the shell dialect restrictions chosen by how it is invoked.

 -- Russ herrold
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Vladislav Rastrusny
fractali...@yandex.ru wrote:
 I didn't mean to start a holy war here! ;) Bash is also ok ;)

Yeah, let's not do it.  Otherwise, someone would start C-shell bashing
soon... Are you listening, Evolution? :-D

Akemi
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:33 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
 On Tue, 12 May 2009, William L. Maltby wrote:
 
 
  On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:42 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
 
  For widest possible coverage, something like bash should be considered.
  curious -- when coding under that criterion, I end up at:
 /bin/sh
  in my script's shebang   ;)
 
  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 Apr  1 17:17 /bin/sh - bash
 
  As it should be.
 
 The use of a link is not a statement that /bin/sh behaves as 
 bash;  the interpreter notes how it was called, and acts to 
 the shell dialect restrictions chosen by how it is invoked.

Yep. See how much I had forgotten? Soon as I read those words, Oh
Yeah!

 
 -- Russ herrold
 snip sig stuff

-- 
Bill (no holy war here, ever)

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi,

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:22, William L. Maltby
centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
 In my experience, most admins set this to the preferred
 shell interpreter (csh, bash, ...).

/bin/sh is the standard path for the Bourne Shell. If you change that
to the C shell or something else that is not compatible with the
Bourne Shell (bash is supposed to be compatible), your box is as
good as broken...

Filipe
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Comments? HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID

2009-05-12 Thread Phil Schaffner
Ed Heron wrote:
   Has anybody had a chance to look at this?

Moving it up on my to-do list...

When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to 
preserve hard links.  Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't 
hurt to use it there also.  An often-recommended alternative is to use tar:

tar -C /mnt/boot.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/boot.new -xf -
tar -C /mnt/root.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/root.new -xf -

Probably a matter of preference.

At step 6, since everything has already been cleanly unmounted, should 
just be able to hit the power button.  Add something to the effect of 
Remove the rescue media before rebooting.

That's all the comments I have without actually going through testing 
the procedure.  Will try that later if I get a round tuit. :-)

Nice job.  Will reference it from the HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 page 
when it goes live.

Phil
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Comments? HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID

2009-05-12 Thread Ed Heron
From: Phil Schaffner, Tuesday, May 12, 2009 2:11 PM

 Ed Heron wrote:
   Has anybody had a chance to look at this?

 Moving it up on my to-do list...

  Thanks.

 When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to
 preserve hard links.  Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't
 hurt to use it there also...

  I'm not sure how well it would do that, but it won't hurt to add.  I'll 
have to put in a hard link and copy across devices and see if the hard 
linked files are hard linked on the dest dev.  Thanks for catching that.  I 
don't use hard links much...

...  An often-recommended alternative is to use tar:

 tar -C /mnt/boot.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/boot.new -xf -
 tar -C /mnt/root.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/root.new -xf -

 Probably a matter of preference.

  I think so.  I use rsync to synchronize samba shares and web sites between 
servers so I've gotten used to using it for other things.  It also looks 
more like a copy, which might be easier to understand for those less 
familiar.  I was considering adding the tar option.  How does tar handle 
hard links?

 At step 6, since everything has already been cleanly unmounted, should
 just be able to hit the power button.  Add something to the effect of
 Remove the rescue media before rebooting.

  I've added the cleanly unmounted / power switch aspect and moved the 
'remove rescue media' to the booting back up portion of the testing step. 
Does that look better?  I debated briefly with myself over suggesting they 
could simply power it off and had discarded it as not best practice.  I'm 
reasonably happy with the compromise.  I'll have to check if install / 
rescue has a shutdown command available...

 That's all the comments I have without actually going through testing
 the procedure.  Will try that later if I get a round tuit. :-)

 Nice job.  Will reference it from the HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5 page
 when it goes live.

  Thanks.  Writing documentation is always a balancing act between not 
putting enough detail in because it seems intuitive to the person who does 
it every day and putting too much in with the effect of it being too 
pedantic.

  I like that the contents becomes a checklist for repeatable processes.

  Do you have a source for round tuits?  I can only find finite sided 
ones...

 Phil

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Contribute request

2009-05-12 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 05/12/2009 10:19 PM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
 Hi,

 On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:22, William L. Maltby
 centos4b...@triad.rr.com wrote:
   
 In my experience, most admins set this to the preferred
 shell interpreter (csh, bash, ...).
 

 /bin/sh is the standard path for the Bourne Shell. 
No, it's not. It just happens that by accident in most linux 
distributions bash is installed/configured to also act as being /bin/sh 
(i.e. with all the restrictions created by the language difference). But 
it's far from being a general Unix rule. Actually I think that Russ 
already implied that...


 If you change that
 to the C shell or something else that is not compatible with the
 Bourne Shell (bash is supposed to be compatible), your box is as
 good as broken...
Try to tell that to someone who has used SunOS (as normal user, not as 
root -- friends know what I mean here in the context of SunOs=9 ) for a 
couple of years :)
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Comments? HowTos/CentOS5ConvertToRAID

2009-05-12 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 05/12/2009 11:11 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
 Ed Heron wrote:
   
   Has anybody had a chance to look at this?
 

 Moving it up on my to-do list...

 When cloning the root partition need to add H to the rsync flags to 
 preserve hard links.  Don't think /boot uses hard links, but wouldn't 
 hurt to use it there also.  An often-recommended alternative is to use tar:

 tar -C /mnt/boot.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/boot.new -xf -
 tar -C /mnt/root.old -cf - . | tar -C /mnt/root.new -xf -

 Probably a matter of preference.
   

find /path/to/source -xdev -print0 | cpio -pa0V /path/to/destination
is also an alternate option... but I prefer rsync usually



___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualizació n Xen o OpenVZ

2009-05-12 Thread Sergio
Hola a todos,

 

Vamos a empezar a trabajar con virtualización para activar maquinas VPS, me
gustaría saber cual software me recomendáis para ello, Xen, OpenVZ o Vmware.

 

Sobre todo por documentación, configuración, copias de seguridad, etc. Las
máquinas virtuales que puedo crear Linux y Windows.

 

Se habla mucho de Xen, pero me gustaría saber vuestras opiniones.

 

Gracias por todo.

Saludos.

 

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualización Xen o OpenVZ

2009-05-12 Thread Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl


Te comento muy a mi punto personal, que tengo en Puebla (Mex), san diego
california (USA) y tijuana(Mex) una serie de servidores con XEN usando
Centos y las maquinas virtuales son Linux, windows 2008 (Trial), w2k3 y
estan funcionando de maravilla, no tengo problemas con ello ... 

nunca he usado OpenVZ y ni mucho menos vwmare por falta de $$$ 

On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:00:12 +0200, Sergio  wrote:   

Hola a todos, 

Vamos a empezar a trabajar con virtualización para activar maquinas VPS,
me gustaría saber cual software me recomendáis para ello, Xen, OpenVZ o
Vmware. 

Sobre todo por documentación, configuración, copias de seguridad, etc.
Las máquinas virtuales que puedo crear Linux y Windows. 

Se habla mucho de Xen, pero me gustaría saber vuestras opiniones. 

Gracias por todo. 

Saludos. 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by MAILSCANNER [1], and is 
believed to be clean. 

More Information in LINUX SOLUTIONS CENTER [2] 

IT Specialist
System Administrator and 
Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows 

Saludos
--
Atte:
Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
IT Specialist
System Administrator and Technical Support Unix/Linux

Site: http://www.linuxsc.net [3]
Site: http://www.linuxsc.org [4]

EMAIL: dvar...@linuxsc.net
MSN: domin...@yahoo.com
PH MOBILE: (+52) 2224 124619
PH CELL: (+52) 2223 284502 

Links:
--
[1] http://www.mailscanner.info/
[2] http://www.linuxsc.net/
[3] http://www.linuxsc.net
[4] http://www.linuxsc.org

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.


More Information in
(http://www.linuxsc.net) Linux Solutions Center

IT Specialist System Administrator and 
Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] Superado el límite de fichero.

2009-05-12 Thread Monica BM
Buenas a todos!!!

yo como siempre con mis lios!!!

Os comento...tengo unas máquians de virtualbox comprimidas en unos ficheros 
tar.gz

Pues los voy a descomprimir con el siguiente comando:

tar -xvzf maquina.tar.gz

Cuando derrepente me dice.

Superado el límite de tamaño de fichero.

Si..el fichero descomprimido supera los 4 Gb.pero yo juraría que antes no 
me decía eso y en otras máquinas con el mismo SO instalado tampoco.

Y nada, que quiero descomprimirlo y no se el modo.

He estado buscando y no encuentro nada de nadaasi que si me echáis una 
manilla os lo agradecería!!

saludotes a todos!!!

pd: en modo gráfico también lo he intentado y me da el mismo error, a los 4 GB 
se para.


Muchas gracias!!


  ___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Superado el límite de fichero.

2009-05-12 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2009/5/12 Monica BM monica...@yahoo.es:
 Buenas a todos!!!

 yo como siempre con mis lios!!!

 Os comento...tengo unas máquians de virtualbox comprimidas en unos ficheros
 tar.gz

 Pues los voy a descomprimir con el siguiente comando:

 tar -xvzf maquina.tar.gz

 Cuando derrepente me dice.

 Superado el límite de tamaño de fichero.

 Si..el fichero descomprimido supera los 4 Gb.pero yo juraría que antes
 no me decía eso y en otras máquinas con el mismo SO instalado tampoco.

Puede ser que estés descomprimiendo sobre un sistema de archivos
basado en FAT? Puede ser el caso si estás sobre un share de Windows
montado con smbclient. Quizás sobre un pendrive?
Si es así prueba a pararte sobre otro disco y repite la misma acción.


 Y nada, que quiero descomprimirlo y no se el modo.

 He estado buscando y no encuentro nada de nadaasi que si me echáis una
 manilla os lo agradecería!!

 saludotes a todos!!!

 pd: en modo gráfico también lo he intentado y me da el mismo error, a los 4
 GB se para.


 Muchas gracias!!



 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es





-- 
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 29, Env ío 15

2009-05-12 Thread Antonio Hernandez Benitez
Problemas de Conexcion (RSH)


Buen dia, estoy tratando de comunicarme de mi equipo linux con centos 4 a un
equipo con windows xp (usando Windos services for unix) y viceversa por
medio de rsh, puesod lograr la comunicacion siun ningun problema pero
siempre me pide contraseña como puedo hacer para conectarme de manera que no
me pida passwors asi tipo ssh, ya probe creando una archivo .rhost dentro
del home del usuario /home/marco/.rhost con los datos de los equipos a
conectar master 10.10.0.1  nodowin 10.10.0.11 alguien puede ayudarme al
respecto
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Javier Aquino H.
Hola Lista,

Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3 
Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor 
para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web, 
Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) de 
la siguiente manera:

Eth0: 192.168.1.100
Eth1: 192.168.1.101
Eth2: 192.168.1.102

Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor 
este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet, 
hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me pareció 
muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice que el 
defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el eth1 y no en 
eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para la tarjeta eth0.

Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def. Gateway 
ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato curioso es que 
cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante el levantamiento 
de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero una vez que termina 
de cargar ya no hay forma.

Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final de 
la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el default 
Gateway ☹.

Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios los 
cuales agradezco desde ya.

Saludos,

Javier.

 

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com
 


-- 
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que est� limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Anthony Mogrovejo
Prueba quitando todas las tarjetas integradas. Y luego las añades uno por
uno, con su configuracion.
Saludos

El 12 de mayo de 2009 13:51, Javier Aquino H.
jaqu...@lexuseditores.comescribió:

 Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3
 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor
 para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web,
 Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24) 
 de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor
 este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet,
 hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me
 pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice
 que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el
 eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para
 la tarjeta eth0.

 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def.
 Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato
 curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante
 el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero
 una vez que termina de cargar ya no hay forma.

 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final
 de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el
 default Gateway ☹.

 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios
 los cuales agradezco desde ya.

 Saludos,

 Javier.



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com



 --
 Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
 en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
 y se considera que está limpio.
 For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




-- 
Anthony Mogrovejo
cel 9-91681659
Consultor Junior IT
Documents Project Fedora
Linux User # 433253
Ubuntu User # 9562
-
Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM...
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualizació n Xen o OpenVZ

2009-05-12 Thread Victor Padro
2009/5/12 Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl domin...@linuxsc.net

 Te comento muy a mi punto personal, que tengo en Puebla (Mex), san diego
 california  (USA) y tijuana(Mex) una serie de servidores con XEN usando
 Centos y las maquinas virtuales son Linux, windows 2008 (Trial), w2k3 y
 estan funcionando de maravilla, no tengo problemas con ello ...



 nunca he usado OpenVZ y ni mucho menos vwmare por falta de  $$$





 On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:00:12 +0200, Sergio listas-li...@cherrytel.com
 wrote:

  Hola a todos,





 Vamos a empezar a trabajar con virtualización para activar maquinas VPS, me
 gustaría saber cual software me recomendáis para ello, Xen, OpenVZ o Vmware.






 Sobre todo por documentación, configuración, copias de seguridad, etc. Las
 máquinas virtuales que puedo crear Linux y Windows.





 Se habla mucho de Xen, pero me gustaría saber vuestras opiniones.





 Gracias por todo.



 Saludos.





 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is
 believed to be clean.

 More Information in *Linux Solutions Center* http://www.linuxsc.net/

 *IT Specialist System Administrator and
 Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows*






 Saludos
 --
 Atte:
 Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
 *IT Specialist
 System Administrator and Technical Support Unix/Linux*

 Site: http://www.linuxsc.net
 Site: http://www.linuxsc.org

 *Email:* dvar...@linuxsc.net
 *MSN:* domin...@yahoo.com
 *Ph Mobile:* (+52) 2224 124619
 *Ph Cell: *(+52) 2223 284502

 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is
 believed to be clean.

 More Information in *Linux Solutions Center* http://www.linuxsc.net/

 *IT Specialist System Administrator and
 Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows*
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


OpenVZ es solo para ambientes Linux, creo que tambien hay para FreeBSD y usa
virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo.

Virtuozzo es la version comercial de OpenVZ, esta si tiene soporte para
Linux y Windows, usa virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo,
paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion por hardware.

Bajo Xen puedes crear/manipular/correr maquinas virtuales en ambiente
Windows, Linux y algunos FreeBSD, usa paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion
por hardware.

En VMware Server/Workstation/ESXi puedes correr maquinas virtuales con
ambientes Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2, Netware, etc. usa emulacion,
paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion de hardware.

Existe otra tecnologia llamada KVM, en ella puedes crear/correr/manipular
ambientes Windows, Linux y FreeBSD, esta usa virtualizacion a nivel de
hardware.

La paravirtualizacion funciona casi en cualquier hardware, desde un Pentium
III a 1Ghz hasta un Xeon Quad Core.

La virtualizacion a nivel de hardware funciona solo tecnologias AMD-V y
Intel-VT, estas vienen en la mayoria de los procesadores de ultima
generacion como Athlon X2, Phenom x3, x4, Opteron Dual Core y Quad Core,
Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Quad Core, Xeon Dual Core y Quad Core, Intel Core
i7.

Lo standart que se esta manejando en VPS es OpenVZ/Virtuozzo y Xen (esto es
para servidores de hosting, aplicaciones en linea, correo, etc), ya que
VMware ESXi se viene manejando para servidores de mision critica(bases de
datos, ERPs, etc.)

KVM es una tecnologia reciente asi que tiene un futuro muy prometedor.

Lo que mejor he visto trabajar bajo procesadores Xeon y Opteron es Xen, KVM
y Virtuozzo para VPS en ambiente Windows.

Para VPS Linux usando procesadores Opteron es definitivamente lo mejor usar
OpenVZ y Virtuozzo

VMware ESXi trabaja muy bien bajo procesadores Xeon, en procesadores Opteron
sigue sin gustarme.

Espero te sirva de algo.

-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Eduardo Grosclaude
2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com:
 Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3 
 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor 
 para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web, 
 Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) 
 de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

Por curiosidad: Cuál es el propósito de tener las tres interfaces a la
misma red? Redundancia para las diferentes máquinas virtuales (para
que compitan menos por una placa o por si alguna falla) o crees que
se pueden saturar? Yo creería al revés, que el equipo de por sí
raramente va a ser capaz de saturar la red (porque son todos servicios
que hacen entrada/salida sobre los discos) y encima la burocracia del
paso de control y datos entre MVs e hipervisor lo va a dejar aún más
por debajo.

Lo de las placas múltiples es una recomendación usual para servidores
virtualizados?
Desde ya muchas gracias



 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final 
 de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el 
 default Gateway ☹.
Qué contenidos tienen los archivos /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-ethX?

-- 
Eduardo Grosclaude
Universidad Nacional del Comahue
Neuquen, Argentina
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) 
 de la siguiente manera:
 
no es normal que nic de un mismo servidor pertenezcan a la misma red ip, 
corrige eso.

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] favor

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
tengo que cnfigurar un cliente vpn con pptp donde consigo información
gracias


 

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com
 

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
Donde consigo informacion para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp en centos
5.4

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 03:16 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx


 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24
) de la siguiente manera:

no es normal que nic de un mismo servidor pertenezcan a la misma red ip,
corrige eso.

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas
de virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com


 

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas
de virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com
 

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 29, Env ío 15

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en centos
5.4

 

 

De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Antonio Hernandez Benitez
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 01:26 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 29, Envío 15

 


Problemas de Conexcion (RSH)

 

 

Buen dia, estoy tratando de comunicarme de mi equipo linux con centos 4 a un
equipo con windows xp (usando Windos services for unix) y viceversa por
medio de rsh, puesod lograr la comunicacion siun ningun problema pero
siempre me pide contraseña como puedo hacer para conectarme de manera que no
me pida passwors asi tipo ssh, ya probe creando una archivo .rhost dentro
del home del usuario /home/marco/.rhost con los datos de los equipos a
conectar master 10.10.0.1  nodowin 10.10.0.11 alguien puede ayudarme al
respecto

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualizació n Xen o OpenVZ

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en centos
5.4

 

De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Victor Padro
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 02:29 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualización Xen o OpenVZ

 

 

2009/5/12 Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl domin...@linuxsc.net

Te comento muy a mi punto personal, que tengo en Puebla (Mex), san diego
california  (USA) y tijuana(Mex) una serie de servidores con XEN usando
Centos y las maquinas virtuales son Linux, windows 2008 (Trial), w2k3 y
estan funcionando de maravilla, no tengo problemas con ello ...

 

nunca he usado OpenVZ y ni mucho menos vwmare por falta de  $$$

 

 

On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:00:12 +0200, Sergio listas-li...@cherrytel.com
wrote:

Hola a todos, 

 

 

Vamos a empezar a trabajar con virtualización para activar maquinas VPS, me
gustaría saber cual software me recomendáis para ello, Xen, OpenVZ o Vmware.


 

 

Sobre todo por documentación, configuración, copias de seguridad, etc. Las
máquinas virtuales que puedo crear Linux y Windows. 

 

 

Se habla mucho de Xen, pero me gustaría saber vuestras opiniones. 

 

 

Gracias por todo. 

 

Saludos. 

 

 

 

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  http://www.mailscanner.info/ MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

More Information in  http://www.linuxsc.net/ Linux Solutions Center 

IT Specialist System Administrator and 
Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows

 




Saludos
--
Atte:
Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
IT Specialist
System Administrator and Technical Support Unix/Linux

Site: http://www.linuxsc.net
Site: http://www.linuxsc.org http://www.linuxsc.org 

Email: dvar...@linuxsc.net
MSN: domin...@yahoo.com
Ph Mobile: (+52) 2224 124619
Ph Cell: (+52) 2223 284502


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and 
dangerous content by  http://www.mailscanner.info/ MailScanner, and is 
believed to be clean. 

More Information in  http://www.linuxsc.net/ Linux Solutions Center 

IT Specialist System Administrator and 
Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows 
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


OpenVZ es solo para ambientes Linux, creo que tambien hay para FreeBSD y usa
virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo.

Virtuozzo es la version comercial de OpenVZ, esta si tiene soporte para
Linux y Windows, usa virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo,
paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion por hardware.

Bajo Xen puedes crear/manipular/correr maquinas virtuales en ambiente
Windows, Linux y algunos FreeBSD, usa paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion
por hardware.

En VMware Server/Workstation/ESXi puedes correr maquinas virtuales con
ambientes Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2, Netware, etc. usa emulacion,
paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion de hardware.

Existe otra tecnologia llamada KVM, en ella puedes crear/correr/manipular
ambientes Windows, Linux y FreeBSD, esta usa virtualizacion a nivel de
hardware.

La paravirtualizacion funciona casi en cualquier hardware, desde un Pentium
III a 1Ghz hasta un Xeon Quad Core.

La virtualizacion a nivel de hardware funciona solo tecnologias AMD-V y
Intel-VT, estas vienen en la mayoria de los procesadores de ultima
generacion como Athlon X2, Phenom x3, x4, Opteron Dual Core y Quad Core,
Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Quad Core, Xeon Dual Core y Quad Core, Intel Core
i7.

Lo standart que se esta manejando en VPS es OpenVZ/Virtuozzo y Xen (esto es
para servidores de hosting, aplicaciones en linea, correo, etc), ya que
VMware ESXi se viene manejando para servidores de mision critica(bases de
datos, ERPs, etc.)

KVM es una tecnologia reciente asi que tiene un futuro muy prometedor.

Lo que mejor he visto trabajar bajo procesadores Xeon y Opteron es Xen, KVM
y Virtuozzo para VPS en ambiente Windows.

Para VPS Linux usando procesadores Opteron es definitivamente lo mejor usar
OpenVZ y Virtuozzo

VMware ESXi trabaja muy bien bajo procesadores Xeon, en procesadores Opteron
sigue sin gustarme.

Espero te sirva de algo.

-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en centos 5.4

 

 

De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En 
nombre de Anthony Mogrovejo
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 02:22 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

 

Prueba quitando todas las tarjetas integradas. Y luego las añades uno por uno, 
con su configuracion.
Saludos

El 12 de mayo de 2009 13:51, Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com 
escribió:

Hola Lista,

Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3 
Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor 
para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web, 
Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) de 
la siguiente manera:

Eth0: 192.168.1.100
Eth1: 192.168.1.101
Eth2: 192.168.1.102

Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor 
este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet, 
hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me pareció 
muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice que el 
defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el eth1 y no en 
eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para la tarjeta eth0.

Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def. Gateway 
ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato curioso es que 
cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante el levantamiento 
de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero una vez que termina 
de cargar ya no hay forma.

Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final de 
la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el default 
Gateway ☹.

Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios los 
cuales agradezco desde ya.

Saludos,

Javier.



__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com



--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




-- 
Anthony Mogrovejo
cel 9-91681659
Consultor Junior IT
Documents Project Fedora
Linux User # 433253
Ubuntu User # 9562 
-
Quisiera cambiar al mundo pero no me dan los RPM...

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Jose Omancio Lopez
Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en centos 5.4

-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En 
nombre de Javier Aquino H.
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 01:51 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

Hola Lista,

Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3 
Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor 
para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web, 
Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24 ) de 
la siguiente manera:

Eth0: 192.168.1.100
Eth1: 192.168.1.101
Eth2: 192.168.1.102

Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor 
este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet, 
hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me pareció 
muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice que el 
defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el eth1 y no en 
eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para la tarjeta eth0.

Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def. Gateway 
ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato curioso es que 
cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante el levantamiento 
de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero una vez que termina 
de cargar ya no hay forma.

Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final de 
la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el default 
Gateway ☹.

Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios los 
cuales agradezco desde ya.

Saludos,

Javier.



__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com



--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros 
contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que est  limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk

 

__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com
 

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Victor Padro
2009/5/12 Jose Omancio Lopez jolo...@pronasa.com.co

 Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en
 centos 5.4

 -Mensaje original-
 De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
 nombre de Javier Aquino H.
 Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 01:51 p.m.
 Para: centos-es@centos.org
 Asunto: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

 Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3
 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor
 para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web,
 Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24) 
 de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor
 este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet,
 hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me
 pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice
 que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el
 eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para
 la tarjeta eth0.

 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def.
 Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato
 curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante
 el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero
 una vez que termina de cargar ya no hay forma.

 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final
 de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el
 default Gateway ☹.

 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios
 los cuales agradezco desde ya.

 Saludos,

 Javier.



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com



 --
 Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y otros
 contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que est  limpio.
 For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Por favor no hagas SPAM con tus multiples correos, con el correo que
mandaste de un inicio es mas que suficiente.



-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Victor Padro
2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com

 Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3
 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor
 para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web,
 Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red ( 192.168.1.0/24) 
 de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor
 este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet,
 hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me
 pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice
 que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el
 eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para
 la tarjeta eth0.

 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def.
 Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato
 curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante
 el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero
 una vez que termina de cargar ya no hay forma.

 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final
 de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el
 default Gateway ☹.

 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios
 los cuales agradezco desde ya.

 Saludos,

 Javier.



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com



 --
 Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
 en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
 y se considera que está limpio.
 For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Ya probaste conectar las demas NICs a la red para ver que hace?
que te hace el comando:

ethtool eth0
ethtool eth1
ethtool eth2

si no tienes el ethtool instalalo con:

yum install ethtool



saludos.


-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 29, Env ío 15

2009-05-12 Thread Victor Padro
2009/5/12 Jose Omancio Lopez jolo...@pronasa.com.co

  Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en
 centos 5.4





 *De:* centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] *En
 nombre de *Antonio Hernandez Benitez
 *Enviado el:* Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 01:26 p.m.
 *Para:* centos-es@centos.org
 *Asunto:* Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 29, Envío 15




 Problemas de Conexcion (RSH)





 Buen dia, estoy tratando de comunicarme de mi equipo linux con centos 4 a
 un equipo con windows xp (usando Windos services for unix) y viceversa por
 medio de rsh, puesod lograr la comunicacion siun ningun problema pero
 siempre me pide contraseña como puedo hacer para conectarme de manera que no
 me pida passwors asi tipo ssh, ya probe creando una archivo .rhost dentro
 del home del usuario /home/marco/.rhost con los datos de los equipos a
 conectar master 10.10.0.1  nodowin 10.10.0.11 alguien puede ayudarme al
 respecto


 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Busca en Google!

Deja de hacer SPAM!!

-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


[CentOS-es] {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Re: Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Javier Aquino H.
Gracias por los comentarios …. Voy a probar y ver que sucede.

 

Por otro lado Ernesto, estaba pensando poner una tarjeta para cada Serv. 
Virtual. Por eso es que todos pertenecen una misma red.

 

Saludos,

 

Javier.

 

 

  _  

De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En 
nombre de Victor Padro
Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 03:33 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Asunto: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y 
ethx

 

 

2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com

Hola Lista,

Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3 
Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor 
para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web, 
Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red (  
http://192.168.1.0/24 MailScanner le advierte: los links numericos son 
comunmente utilizados en actividades maliciosas: 192.168.1.0/24 ) de la 
siguiente manera:

Eth0: 192.168.1.100
Eth1: 192.168.1.101
Eth2: 192.168.1.102

Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el servidor 
este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a Internet, 
hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo cual me pareció 
muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n” me dice que el 
defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa es el eth1 y no en 
eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para la tarjeta eth0.

Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def. Gateway 
ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato curioso es que 
cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante el levantamiento 
de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero una vez que termina 
de cargar ya no hay forma.

Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al final de 
la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1 para el default 
Gateway ☹.

Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros comentarios los 
cuales agradezco desde ya.

Saludos,

Javier.



__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de 
virus 4068 (20090512) __

ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

http://www.eset.com



--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que está limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Ya probaste conectar las demas NICs a la red para ver que hace?
que te hace el comando: 

ethtool eth0
ethtool eth1
ethtool eth2

si no tienes el ethtool instalalo con:

yum install ethtool



saludos.


-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente 
servidas

-- 
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por  http://www.mailscanner.info/ MailScanner 
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos, 
y se considera que está limpio. 
MailScanner agradece a transtec Computers http://www.transtec.co.uk/  por su 
apoyo. 


-- 
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
y se considera que est� limpio.
For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] favor

2009-05-12 Thread Ricardo Martinez
Hola José,

yo para las VPNs, utilizo OPENVPN

website: www.openvpn.org

las suelo montar en modo road warrior
es decir clientes de fuera de la oficina se conectan a un servidor.

de todas formas hay un buen manual es:
http://www.ecualug.org/?q=2007/02/06/comos/centos/c_mo_instalar_y_configurar_openvpn

saludos



2009/5/12 Jose Omancio Lopez jolo...@pronasa.com.co

 tengo que cnfigurar un cliente vpn con pptp donde consigo información
 gracias




 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] favor

2009-05-12 Thread Walter Cervini
Podria por favor el moderador de la lista moderar los mensajes de este
usuario, creo que no entiende como funcionan las listas.

Gracias
Walter Cervini
movil: 0424-1543350
Pin: 20911CF3
Sent from Caracas, Venezuela

2009/5/13 Jose Omancio Lopez jolo...@pronasa.com.co

 tengo que cnfigurar un cliente vpn con pptp donde consigo información
 gracias




 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] {Disarmed} {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Re: Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
 Por otro lado Ernesto, estaba pensando poner una tarjeta para cada
 Serv. Virtual. Por eso es que todos pertenecen una misma red.
 
 
hum... yo mejor haría bonding...

puedes hacer bridging también.. pero poner ips de una misma red en 
diferentes nics del mismo servidor no es normal.

hay un howto para usar una nic para un domU.. en el sitio de xen, 
realmente no le he usado pero te garantizo que no será de la forma que 
intentas.

saludos!
epe

 
 Saludos,
 
 
 
 Javier.
 
 
 
 
 
 _
 
 De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org
 [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de Victor Padro 
 Enviado el: Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 03:33 p.m. Para:
 centos-es@centos.org Asunto: {Fraud?} {Disarmed} Re: [CentOS-es]
 Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx
 
 
 
 
 
 2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com
 
 Hola Lista,
 
 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:
 
 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco
 y 3 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar
 este servidor para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base
 de datos, Página Web, Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la
 instalación todo bien.
 
 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red (
 http://192.168.1.0/24 MailScanner le advierte: los links numericos
 son comunmente utilizados en actividades maliciosas: 192.168.1.0/24 )
 de la siguiente manera:
 
 Eth0: 192.168.1.100 Eth1: 192.168.1.101 Eth2: 192.168.1.102
 
 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1
 
 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el
 servidor este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede
 salir a Internet, hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al
 servidor lo cual me pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema.
 Al hacer “route –n” me dice que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1
 pero el dispositivo que usa es el eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser
 muy a pesar que ese valor configuré para la tarjeta eth0.
 
 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el
 def. Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza.
 Otro dato curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento
 (muy breve) durante el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo
 hacer un ping al servidor pero una vez que termina de cargar ya no
 hay forma.
 
 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al
 final de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el
 eth1 para el default Gateway ☹.
 
 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros
 comentarios los cuales agradezco desde ya.
 
 Saludos,
 
 Javier.
 
 
 
 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __
 
 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.
 
 http://www.eset.com
 
 
 
 -- Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner en busca de virus y
 otros contenidos peligrosos, y se considera que está limpio. For all
 your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk
 
 
 ___ CentOS-es mailing
 list CentOS-es@centos.org 
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
 
 
 Ya probaste conectar las demas NICs a la red para ver que hace? que
 te hace el comando:
 
 ethtool eth0 ethtool eth1 ethtool eth2
 
 si no tienes el ethtool instalalo con:
 
 yum install ethtool
 
 
 
 saludos.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ___ CentOS-es mailing
 list CentOS-es@centos.org 
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualizació n Xen o OpenVZ

2009-05-12 Thread Guille
El 12 de mayo de 2009 17:34, Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com escribió:



 2009/5/12 Jose Omancio Lopez jolo...@pronasa.com.co

  Donde consigo información para configurar un cliente vpn con pptp  en
 centos 5.4



 *De:* centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org]
 *En nombre de *Victor Padro
 *Enviado el:* Martes, 12 de Mayo de 2009 02:29 p.m.
 *Para:* centos-es@centos.org
 *Asunto:* Re: [CentOS-es] Mejor alternativa para virtualización Xen o
 OpenVZ





 2009/5/12 Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl domin...@linuxsc.net

 Te comento muy a mi punto personal, que tengo en Puebla (Mex), san diego
 california  (USA) y tijuana(Mex) una serie de servidores con XEN usando
 Centos y las maquinas virtuales son Linux, windows 2008 (Trial), w2k3 y
 estan funcionando de maravilla, no tengo problemas con ello ...



 nunca he usado OpenVZ y ni mucho menos vwmare por falta de  $$$





 On Tue, 12 May 2009 13:00:12 +0200, Sergio listas-li...@cherrytel.com
 wrote:

   Hola a todos,





 Vamos a empezar a trabajar con virtualización para activar maquinas VPS,
 me gustaría saber cual software me recomendáis para ello, Xen, OpenVZ o
 Vmware.





 Sobre todo por documentación, configuración, copias de seguridad, etc. Las
 máquinas virtuales que puedo crear Linux y Windows.





 Se habla mucho de Xen, pero me gustaría saber vuestras opiniones.





 Gracias por todo.



 Saludos.







 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is

 believed to be clean.

 More Information in *Linux Solutions Center* http://www.linuxsc.net/

 *IT Specialist System Administrator and
 Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows*






 Saludos
 --
 Atte:
 Lic. Domingo Varela Yahuitl.
 *IT Specialist
 System Administrator and Technical Support Unix/Linux*

 Site: http://www.linuxsc.net
 Site: http://www.linuxsc.org

 *Email:* dvar...@linuxsc.net
 *MSN:* domin...@yahoo.com
 *Ph Mobile:* (+52) 2224 124619
 *Ph Cell: *(+52) 2223 284502


 --
 This message has been scanned for viruses and
 dangerous content by *MailScanner* http://www.mailscanner.info/, and is

 believed to be clean.

 More Information in *Linux Solutions Center* http://www.linuxsc.net/

 *IT Specialist System Administrator and
 Technical Suport Unix/Linux/Windows*
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 OpenVZ es solo para ambientes Linux, creo que tambien hay para FreeBSD y
 usa virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo.

 Virtuozzo es la version comercial de OpenVZ, esta si tiene soporte para
 Linux y Windows, usa virtualizacion a nivel de sistema operativo,
 paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion por hardware.

 Bajo Xen puedes crear/manipular/correr maquinas virtuales en ambiente
 Windows, Linux y algunos FreeBSD, usa paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion
 por hardware.

 En VMware Server/Workstation/ESXi puedes correr maquinas virtuales con
 ambientes Windows, Linux, FreeBSD, OS/2, Netware, etc. usa emulacion,
 paravirtualizacion y virtualizacion de hardware.

 Existe otra tecnologia llamada KVM, en ella puedes crear/correr/manipular
 ambientes Windows, Linux y FreeBSD, esta usa virtualizacion a nivel de
 hardware.

 La paravirtualizacion funciona casi en cualquier hardware, desde un
 Pentium III a 1Ghz hasta un Xeon Quad Core.

 La virtualizacion a nivel de hardware funciona solo tecnologias AMD-V y
 Intel-VT, estas vienen en la mayoria de los procesadores de ultima
 generacion como Athlon X2, Phenom x3, x4, Opteron Dual Core y Quad Core,
 Intel Core 2 Duo, Intel Quad Core, Xeon Dual Core y Quad Core, Intel Core
 i7.

 Lo standart que se esta manejando en VPS es OpenVZ/Virtuozzo y Xen (esto
 es para servidores de hosting, aplicaciones en linea, correo, etc), ya que
 VMware ESXi se viene manejando para servidores de mision critica(bases de
 datos, ERPs, etc.)

 KVM es una tecnologia reciente asi que tiene un futuro muy prometedor.

 Lo que mejor he visto trabajar bajo procesadores Xeon y Opteron es Xen,
 KVM y Virtuozzo para VPS en ambiente Windows.

 Para VPS Linux usando procesadores Opteron es definitivamente lo mejor
 usar OpenVZ y Virtuozzo

 VMware ESXi trabaja muy bien bajo procesadores Xeon, en procesadores
 Opteron sigue sin gustarme.

 Espero te sirva de algo.

 --
 It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

 Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o
 mediocremente servidas


 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Por favor no secuestres los topics que alguien mas manda.

 Deja de hacer SPAM!!!


 --
 It is human nature to think wisely

Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Juan Pablo Botero
Ya revisaste la configuración del SELinux?.

Para descartar, desactivalo, si deshabilitando tienes la solución, activalo
y lo configuras de nuevo:

# setup
- Firewall Configuration
- Customize (Personalizar), allí miras los dispositivos permitidos.

Nos cuentas como te va.

2009/5/12 Walter Cervini wcerv...@gmail.com

 Por lo general los servidores traen dos NIC, por l de la redundancia, en
 ese configuras las interfaces en modo bonding.
 Walter Cervini
 movil: 0424-1543350
 Pin: 20911CF3
 Sent from Caracas, Venezuela

 2009/5/13 Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com



 2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com

  Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y 3
 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este servidor
 para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos, Página Web,
 Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red (
 192.168.1.0/24 ) de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el
 servidor este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a
 Internet, hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo
 cual me pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route –n”
 me dice que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa
 es el eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor configuré
 para la tarjeta eth0.

 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def.
 Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato
 curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) durante
 el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor pero
 una vez que termina de cargar ya no hay forma.

 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al
 final de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1
 para el default Gateway ☹.

 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros
 comentarios los cuales agradezco desde ya.

 Saludos,

 Javier.



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com



 --
 Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
 en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
 y se considera que está limpio.
 For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Ya probaste conectar las demas NICs a la red para ver que hace?
 que te hace el comando:

 ethtool eth0
 ethtool eth1
 ethtool eth2

 si no tienes el ethtool instalalo con:

 yum install ethtool



 saludos.



 --
 It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

 Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o
 mediocremente servidas

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es



 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




-- 
Juan Pablo Botero
Administrador de Sistemas informáticos
http://jpill.wordpress.com
eSSuX: http://slcolombia.org/eSSuX
Linux Registered user #435293
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] Curioso caso de default gateway y ethx

2009-05-12 Thread Victor Padro
2009/5/12 Juan Pablo Botero juanpabloboterolo...@gmail.com

 Ya revisaste la configuración del SELinux?.

 Para descartar, desactivalo, si deshabilitando tienes la solución, activalo
 y lo configuras de nuevo:

 # setup
 - Firewall Configuration
 - Customize (Personalizar), allí miras los dispositivos permitidos.

 Nos cuentas como te va.

 2009/5/12 Walter Cervini wcerv...@gmail.com

 Por lo general los servidores traen dos NIC, por l de la redundancia, en
 ese configuras las interfaces en modo bonding.
 Walter Cervini
 movil: 0424-1543350
 Pin: 20911CF3
 Sent from Caracas, Venezuela

 2009/5/13 Victor Padro vpa...@gmail.com



 2009/5/12 Javier Aquino H. jaqu...@lexuseditores.com

  Hola Lista,

 Les comento un poco que hice y que problema tengo:

 Instalé CentOS 5.3 en un servidor HP con 6 GB de Ram, 450 GB de Disco y
 3 Tarjetas de Red ( eth0, eth1 y eth2 ), la idea es virtualizar este
 servidor para soportar diversos servicios de mi empresa ( Base de datos,
 Página Web, Correo, File Server, etc ). Durante la instalación todo bien.

 Las 3 tarjetas de red pertenecen al mismo segmento de red (
 192.168.1.0/24 ) de la siguiente manera:

 Eth0: 192.168.1.100
 Eth1: 192.168.1.101
 Eth2: 192.168.1.102

 Lóxicamente el default Gateway es el 192.168.1.1

 Actualmente solo el eth0 tiene cable de red, pero cuando inicio el
 servidor este aparece aislado de la red por consiguiente no puede salir a
 Internet, hacer ping a otras pc o hacer un ping de otra pc al servidor lo
 cual me pareció muy raro y revisando di con el problema. Al hacer “route 
 –n”
 me dice que el defaul Gateway es el 192.168.1.1 pero el dispositivo que usa
 es el eth1 y no en eth0 como debería ser muy a pesar que ese valor 
 configuré
 para la tarjeta eth0.

 Un dato curioso es que cuando hago un “service network restart” el def.
 Gateway ya apunta al eth0 como debe ser y todo se normaliza. Otro dato
 curioso es que cuando el servidor inicia, por un momento (muy breve) 
 durante
 el levantamiento de los servicios si le puedo hacer un ping al servidor 
 pero
 una vez que termina de cargar ya no hay forma.

 Alguien sabe que podría estar pasando  es como si algún script al
 final de la carga de los servicios le dijera a mi Server que use el eth1
 para el default Gateway ☹.

 Sorry por lo extenso del correo, quedo a la espera de vuestros
 comentarios los cuales agradezco desde ya.

 Saludos,

 Javier.



 __ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de
 firmas de virus 4068 (20090512) __

 ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este mensaje.

 http://www.eset.com



 --
 Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
 en busca de virus y otros contenidos peligrosos,
 y se considera que está limpio.
 For all your IT requirements visit: http://www.transtec.co.uk


 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


 Ya probaste conectar las demas NICs a la red para ver que hace?
 que te hace el comando:

 ethtool eth0
 ethtool eth1
 ethtool eth2

 si no tienes el ethtool instalalo con:

 yum install ethtool



 saludos.



 --
 It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

 Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o
 mediocremente servidas

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es



 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




 --
 Juan Pablo Botero
 Administrador de Sistemas informáticos
 http://jpill.wordpress.com
 eSSuX: http://slcolombia.org/eSSuX
 Linux Registered user #435293

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es



Con ethtool puedes ver si en verdad esta conectada la(s) NIC(s), que
velocidad usa(n) la(s) interface(s) eth0, eth1, eth2, entre otras cosas.

Yo uso bonding(load balancing) con cuatro NICs en dos diferentes subredes,
nada mas que no uso Xen si no con OpenVZ y no estan dificil hacerlo
funcionar, de este sitio me guie para hacer que funcionaran a la perfeccion:

http://www.howtoforge.com/network_card_bonding_centos

Podrias tambien checar el SElinux como sugirieron anteriormente.


-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 04:52 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@... writes:
 
  
  JohnS jse...@... writes:
  
 
 I tried switching over to wget but inspite of having 2mbps link which gives 
 us a
 download speed of around 200kBytes/sec otherwise, wget manages only
 15-20kBytes/s even after using --limit-rate=150k
 
 Nothing interesting in the /etc/wgetrc and no ~/.wgetrc either
---
May be a server issue. You may want to try another server. If you have a
local LAN try to wget a large file for comparing.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
JohnS jse...@... writes:

 
 
 May be a server issue. You may want to try another server. If you have a
 local LAN try to wget a large file for comparing.
 

But from the same server, on a windows box with DAP such speeds are available
with multiple files downloading. I want to switch them over to centos so it can
be decently cron-nable job.

The aggregate speed I have observed vary from 190kBytes/sec to peak of
230kBytes/sec -- On a Winbox -- with AV and other thrash running...

Regards and thanks

Rajagopal



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
JohnS jse...@... writes:

  Is there a method to log the filenames that are downloaded?
 
 Hmm prolly so, I believe for sure wget can do that and also 
 pull files from a server based on a filelist.
 
 
 Where do you get all those other options because there is no Man Page
 and lftp --help shows very little. Anyway that is what I use to mirror
 CentOS 5 4 and 2.1 with and no problems with high CPU usage.
 

just type lftp.
It drops you into a shell and help is your friend.
set -a gives you all kinds of variables that can be set

Regards

Rajagopal


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 06:17 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
 JohnS jse...@... writes:
 
   Is there a method to log the filenames that are downloaded?
  
  Hmm prolly so, I believe for sure wget can do that and also 
  pull files from a server based on a filelist.
  
  
  Where do you get all those other options because there is no Man Page
  and lftp --help shows very little. Anyway that is what I use to mirror
  CentOS 5 4 and 2.1 with and no problems with high CPU usage.
  
 
 just type lftp.
 It drops you into a shell and help is your friend.
 set -a gives you all kinds of variables that can be set
---
I never actually use the shell like that way. Will check the set -a
variable later on.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

2009-05-12 Thread Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of William L. Maltby
Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

 The monitor is OK as it's attached via a KVM switch to another machine -
 also with an nVidia card - and it displays perfectly on that.

Sometime the OS can't read the monitor properly and doesn't set it up
accordingly. Try connecting the monitor directly to your KVM-switch and let
the OS rescan it. After, connect it back to the switch. Or just force the
correct resolution.

HTH.
-- 
/Sorin


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 06:13 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
 JohnS jse...@... writes:
 
  
  
  May be a server issue. You may want to try another server. If you have a
  local LAN try to wget a large file for comparing.
  
 
 But from the same server, on a windows box with DAP such speeds are available
 with multiple files downloading. I want to switch them over to centos so it 
 can
 be decently cron-nable job.
 
 The aggregate speed I have observed vary from 190kBytes/sec to peak of
 230kBytes/sec -- On a Winbox -- with AV and other thrash running...
---
Check out you networking stack. Like NIC Card settings with ethtool and
your dns like namserver settings in resolve.conf. If it is getting an
address by dhcp sometimes it want pull in the actual real dns servers.
All will get is like a 192.168.0.x from the modem/router. Ifconfig ethX
will show you the amount of packets dropped also. Possibly a driver
issue with your nic? Could be many things you just have to go step by
step...

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

2009-05-12 Thread Chaminda Mendis

I also had this problem.
I try with yum update --skip-broken now that solved



JohnS wrote:

On Sun, 2009-05-10 at 03:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
  

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 3:41 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:


Can someone help me figure out what I have to do about to get update to
work with this happening:
  
-- Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: httpd

-- Finished Dependency Resolution
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
 -- Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by package
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed)
  

Run a 'yum clean all' and try again.  Please see:

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613

Akemi / toracat


---
Let the Record reflect I've had updates stalled on 15 machines. yum
clean all really isn't the answer.

JohnStanley

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread Rajagopal Swaminathan
JohnS jse...@... writes:

 ---
 Check out you networking stack. Like NIC Card settings with ethtool and
 your dns like namserver settings in resolve.conf. If it is getting an
 address by dhcp sometimes it want pull in the actual real dns servers.

ethtool eth0 

spake thus:

Settings for eth0:
Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
Speed: 100Mb/s
Duplex: Full
Port: MII
PHYAD: 0
Transceiver: internal
Auto-negotiation: on
Supports Wake-on: pumbg
Wake-on: g
Current message level: 0x0033 (51)
Link detected: yes


They are reasonably fine. it is a static IP.

 All will get is like a 192.168.0.x from the modem/router. Ifconfig ethX
 will show you the amount of packets dropped also. Possibly a driver
 issue with your nic? Could be many things you just have to go step by
 step...
 

ifconfig eth0
eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:E6:96:CD:A8
  inet addr:192.168.2.220  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::216:e6ff:fe96:cda8/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:3434000 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:1879546 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:2928267020 (2.7 GiB)  TX bytes:550552465 (525.0 MiB)
  Interrupt:177 Base address:0xe000


But then yum install/update etc gives me reasonable speeds in the range of
100-120 KBytes/second and our network load is that much usually. 15-20Kbytes is
ridiculous

We have a DNS server (an AD server)

Is it that something that wget puts out in the network that is not liked by our
firewall?

Regards

Rajagopal

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] High CPU usage by lftp

2009-05-12 Thread JohnS

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 08:04 +, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
 JohnS jse...@... writes:
 
  ---
  Check out you networking stack. Like NIC Card settings with ethtool and
  your dns like namserver settings in resolve.conf. If it is getting an
  address by dhcp sometimes it want pull in the actual real dns servers.
 
 ethtool eth0 
 
 spake thus:
 
 Settings for eth0:
 Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
 Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
 Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
 Advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full
 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
 1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
 Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
 Speed: 100Mb/s
 Duplex: Full
 Port: MII
 PHYAD: 0
 Transceiver: internal
 Auto-negotiation: on
 Supports Wake-on: pumbg
 Wake-on: g
 Current message level: 0x0033 (51)
 Link detected: yes
 
 
 They are reasonably fine. it is a static IP.
 
  All will get is like a 192.168.0.x from the modem/router. Ifconfig ethX
  will show you the amount of packets dropped also. Possibly a driver
  issue with your nic? Could be many things you just have to go step by
  step...
  
 
 ifconfig eth0
 eth0  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:E6:96:CD:A8
   inet addr:192.168.2.220  Bcast:192.168.2.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
   inet6 addr: fe80::216:e6ff:fe96:cda8/64 Scope:Link
   UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
   RX packets:3434000 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
   TX packets:1879546 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
   collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
   RX bytes:2928267020 (2.7 GiB)  TX bytes:550552465 (525.0 MiB)
   Interrupt:177 Base address:0xe000
 
 
 But then yum install/update etc gives me reasonable speeds in the range of
 100-120 KBytes/second and our network load is that much usually. 15-20Kbytes 
 is
 ridiculous
 
 We have a DNS server (an AD server)
 
 Is it that something that wget puts out in the network that is not liked by 
 our
 firewall?
---
That is possible and it could be Bandwidth Throttling the connection
much like ISPs do to peer to peer networks.

There is a wget for windows. Maybe you could try that and compare the
difference.

http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 18:15 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
 snip
  
  Ralph was working on this earlier today, however it would be really good 
  to get a copy of someone's /var/cache/yum ( minus the rpm's ) in a 
  tarball, attached to that bugreport - from a time when they can 
  demonstrate the issue. ie 'before' doing the yum clean all.
 
 I just tried an update to create what you mention. Unfortunately ...
 
No Packages marked for Update
 
 Tried again after a clean all, same results. Maybe Ralph has it Under
 Construction. I'll give it another shot late tonight or tomorrow A.M.
 

05:50 A.M Eastern 5/12 I tried again. Still nada.
# yum list available httpd\*
snip
Available Packages
httpd-devel.i386   2.2.3-22.el5.centosbase
httpd-manual.i386  2.2.3-22.el5.centosbase
# rpm -q --last httpd.i386
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos  Wed 01 Apr 2009 05:22:23 PM EDT

I guess it is temporarily withdrawn?

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

2009-05-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 05/11/2009 05:24 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
  http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613
 
  I'll note for the Record that the yum clean all trick worked on
  100% of my x86_64 machines, about six in all.
 
 
 Ralph was working on this earlier today, however it would be really good 
 to get a copy of someone's /var/cache/yum ( minus the rpm's ) in a 
 tarball, attached to that bugreport - from a time when they can 
 demonstrate the issue. ie 'before' doing the yum clean all.

As that was a bit too large for the bug tracker:

http://people.centos.org/ralph/update.tar.bz2

r...@dryckjom:~# LANG=C yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=update  whatprovides 
/usr/share/magic.mime
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
Excluding Packages in global exclude list
Finished
Importing additional filelist information
kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.x86_64 : Development package for building 
kernel
: modules to match the kernel.
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/share/magic.mime

file-4.17-15.x86_64 : A utility for determining file types.
Matched from:
Other   : Provides-match: /usr/share/magic.mime

Ralph


pgpVUtXMh0V4Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 12:06 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
 snip

 As that was a bit too large for the bug tracker:
 
 http://people.centos.org/ralph/update.tar.bz2
 
 r...@dryckjom:~# LANG=C yum --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=update  
 whatprovides /usr/share/magic.mime
 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
 Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 Excluding Packages in global exclude list
 Finished
 Importing additional filelist information
 kernel-xen-devel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5.x86_64 : Development package for 
 building kernel
 : modules to match the kernel.
 Matched from:
 Filename: /usr/share/magic.mime
 
 file-4.17-15.x86_64 : A utility for determining file types.
 Matched from:
 Other   : Provides-match: /usr/share/magic.mime
 
 Ralph

And on my 32 bit system, just FYI

# ls -l /usr/share/magic.mime
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 May 11 06:35 \
/usr/share/magic.mime - file/magic.mime
# ls -lL /usr/share/magic.mime
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31150 Apr 30 18:20 /usr/share/magic.mime
# ls -l /usr/share/file/magic.mime
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 31150 Apr 30 18:20 /usr/share/file/magic.mime

HTH
-- 
Bill


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Calendar server

2009-05-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Scott Silva wrote:

 I actually used the tarball from the horde site. If you untar it under your
 webroot, it is pretty easy. I have it authing through imp, which auths through
 IMAP from my local users. It was a lot easier then the rpm's in the extra, but
 you can't beat the ease of just yum groupinstall Horde Apps

Cool. I'll have to check it out again then.

We're currently running SquirrelMail here for webmail. While it's fine, 
it does only one thing, and that's e-mail. We really need shareable 
calendars, contact manager, and e-mail client all in one.

Currently our backend is Postfix and dovecot. SquirrelMail connects 
through IMAP then. My boss wants me to keep the backend in place, so if 
Horde can connect through IMAP to pull mail, that would be ideal.

I've been using Zimbra on my own e-mail account at work as a test, but 
the only thing that I don't like about Zimbra is that it cannot connect 
to anyone else with IMAP. It expects to be the full-blown mail server, 
not a secondary type system. So I had to set it up and jump through some 
hoops to get it talk, forward, and deliver mail, etc. from Postfix.

I had looked at Horde some time ago, but brushed it off. I think I'll 
check it out though again and get it up and running.

Thanks!
Max
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] iso creation with dd

2009-05-12 Thread James Matthews
Use mkisofs next time. It is designed to create iso files (cd images)

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Al Sparks data...@yahoo.com wrote:


 I placed a CD in a drive.
   I ran
 sudo dd sudo dd if=/dev/cdrom of=HMI_B_Image_File_4-23-09_disk_1.iso

 It completed.  I then transferred the ISO file to an XP machine, use
 Sonic to burn the ISO file to another CD, and there was a file missing
 (the largest) in the burned CD.

 Seems like the data got transferred through the dd, but not a file
 name.  What might I be doing wrong?
   === Al

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 

http://www.goldwatches.com/Watches.asp?Brand=71
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Hardening

2009-05-12 Thread James Matthews
It also depends on which service you are running on the server. It depends
on what you are running etc

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle
 mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
  What tips does everyone have on hardening a CenOS Server that is
  running web, e-mail, ssh, ftp, mysql, coldfusion and will be
  processing payments from www?

 I was out of town and I just read your post. I would strongly suggest
 that you download the free manual about hardening RHEL 5,  in .pdf
 form, from nsa.gov   As I recall, they do *NOT* recommend running more
 than one service on a server, if possible. Among many other
 recommendations. Search for Guide to the Secure Configuration of Red
 Hat Enterprise Linux 5, Revision 2, December 20, 2007. HTH
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 

http://www.goldwatches.com/Watches.asp?Brand=71
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] yum dependency problem on 5.3

2009-05-12 Thread fred smith
Hi!

I've got three Centos-5.3 machines. one of' em ran the latest updates without 
trouble.

the other two are giving me grief. both giving the same error:

# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: ftp.lug.udel.edu
 * updates: mirror.icpl.org
 * addons: www.gtlib.gatech.edu
 * extras: mirror.highspeedweb.net
Setting up Update Process
Resolving Dependencies
-- Running transaction check
--- Package kexec-tools.i386 0:1.102pre-56.el5_3.2 set to be 
updated
--- Package kernel.i686 0:2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 set to be 
installed
--- Package audit-libs.i386 0:1.7.7-6.el5_3.3 set to be updated
--- Package kernel-headers.i386 0:2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 set to 
be updated
--- Package file.i386 0:4.17-15.el5_3.1 set to be updated
--- Package audit-libs-python.i386 0:1.7.7-6.el5_3.3 set to be 
updated
--- Package kernel-devel.i686 0:2.6.18-128.1.10.el5 set to be 
installed
--- Package sos.noarch 0:1.7-9.16.el5_3.5 set to be updated
--- Package pango.i386 0:1.14.9-5.el5.centos set to be updated
--- Package audit.i386 0:1.7.7-6.el5_3.3 set to be updated
-- Processing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime for package: 
httpd
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 from installed has depsolving 
problems
  -- Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by 
package httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: /usr/share/magic.mime is needed by 
package httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.i386 (installed)


I don't get this: /usr/share/magic/mime exists. it's not trying to
install or update httpd. where is it getting this dependency problem from?

More importantly, how do I resolve it?

Thanks!
-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us  
Do you not know? Have you not heard? 
The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. 
  He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom.
- Isaiah 40:28 (niv) -


pgpj6ByxZ9bwN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] yum dependency problem on 5.3

2009-05-12 Thread Karanbir Singh
fred smith wrote:
 I don't get this: /usr/share/magic/mime exists. it's not trying to
 install or update httpd. where is it getting this dependency problem from?

For now:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613

Were working on a more permanent fix in the mean time.

- KB
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] yum dependency problem on 5.3

2009-05-12 Thread Steve Huff


On May 12, 2009, at 9:13 AM, fred smith wrote:


More importantly, how do I resolve it?



http://www.google.com/search?q=centos+%2Fusr%2Fshare%2Fmagic%2Fmime

-steve

--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an  
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v

http://five.sentenc.es



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Hardening

2009-05-12 Thread Lanny Marcus
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 11:19 AM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle
mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote:
 What tips does everyone have on hardening a CenOS Server that is
 running web, e-mail, ssh, ftp, mysql, coldfusion and will be
 processing payments from www?

Jason: In addition to the other recommendations in this thread, IMHO,
you should contemplate offloading the credit card processing, to a
company who has the expertise and network required, to try to protect
that data. Lanny
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread Shad L. Lords
Chris Boyd wrote:
 So I have an issue with CentOS 5.3 i386, LVM, and SATA.
 
 Boot device is a 200GB ATA disk on hda2.
 
 I've added a couple of disks with the on-the-mobo SATA controller ports
 and grown the EXT3 fs with system-config-lvm.
 
 Then, as an experiment, I added a PCI SATA controller and an additional
 disk.  Ran system-config-lvm, added the new space to the existing
 VolGroup00, and all was good.
 
 Feeling confident, I shut the box down and plugged another disk in to
 the PCI SATA controller.  On reboot, I was greeted with a kernel panic
 since the OS could not find really-long-label.  Removing the new SATA
 disk did not fix the issue.

My guess would be that the driver for the new PCI card isn't part of the 
initrd.  If you don't have any data on the drive yet you could always 
reduce the vg so that it is no longer included.  You could also recreate 
your initrd to include the driver for the pci card.

-Shad
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Agentless Inventory

2009-05-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Anyone know of an OS/Software inventory tool that supports Linux and Windows
that is agentless?

Thanks,
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Calendar server

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-12-2009 4:24 AM Max Hetrick spake the following:
 Scott Silva wrote:
 
 I actually used the tarball from the horde site. If you untar it under your
 webroot, it is pretty easy. I have it authing through imp, which auths 
 through
 IMAP from my local users. It was a lot easier then the rpm's in the extra, 
 but
 you can't beat the ease of just yum groupinstall Horde Apps
 
 Cool. I'll have to check it out again then.
 
 We're currently running SquirrelMail here for webmail. While it's fine, 
 it does only one thing, and that's e-mail. We really need shareable 
 calendars, contact manager, and e-mail client all in one.
 
 Currently our backend is Postfix and dovecot. SquirrelMail connects 
 through IMAP then. My boss wants me to keep the backend in place, so if 
 Horde can connect through IMAP to pull mail, that would be ideal.
 
 I've been using Zimbra on my own e-mail account at work as a test, but 
 the only thing that I don't like about Zimbra is that it cannot connect 
 to anyone else with IMAP. It expects to be the full-blown mail server, 
 not a secondary type system. So I had to set it up and jump through some 
 hoops to get it talk, forward, and deliver mail, etc. from Postfix.
 
 I had looked at Horde some time ago, but brushed it off. I think I'll 
 check it out though again and get it up and running.
 
 Thanks!
 Max
Most of my users seem OK with it. I was running it side by side with roundcube
as a test, and most users seem to like the extra bits. Besides, horde keeps
compatibility with less than brand new PHP versions, but Roundcube insists you
have the newest PHP installed everytime they generate a new version. I just
can't hack a production server every few months at the whim of developers that
want to play in a new sandbox every week.

Squirrelmail is supposed to have many addons like shared addressbooks and
calendars, but it seems that many of the apps don't play well with others. I
gave up on trying to get them to work.

As for IMAP access, Horde is fine. It will also work with other backends like
Kolab if you so choose. I also didn't want to use Zimbra because I run my own
spam and virus scanning, and I didn't want to downgrade to what Zimbra
thinks works. And Horde has been around for a long time, and seems to stay
current. The devels are very active, and patches come out regularly.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:47 -0600, Shad L. Lords wrote:
 Chris Boyd wrote:
  So I have an issue with CentOS 5.3 i386, LVM, and SATA.
  
  Boot device is a 200GB ATA disk on hda2.
  
  I've added a couple of disks with the on-the-mobo SATA controller ports
  and grown the EXT3 fs with system-config-lvm.
  
  Then, as an experiment, I added a PCI SATA controller and an additional
  disk.  Ran system-config-lvm, added the new space to the existing
  VolGroup00, and all was good.
  
  Feeling confident, I shut the box down and plugged another disk in to
  the PCI SATA controller.  On reboot, I was greeted with a kernel panic
  since the OS could not find really-long-label.  Removing the new SATA
  disk did not fix the issue.
 
 My guess would be that the driver for the new PCI card isn't part of the 
 initrd.  If you don't have any data on the drive yet you could always 
 reduce the vg so that it is no longer included.  You could also recreate 
 your initrd to include the driver for the pci card.

Alternately, since the BIOS re-assigned the drive letters, the mkinitrd
still contains ignore-lock-failure for only the originally installed
disk. I've successfully handled this (in test and live) by extracting
the mkinitrd (cpio format, IIRC), changing the init to ignore lock
failures on the new disk and making a new initrd. Then it worked.
However, this was for a fall-back for if the first drive got trashed,
the back-up disk had an LV with a slightly modified name and would be
seen as the new sda.

For the OP's situation, might need to search a little further to get to
the same results. But I think it's surely something in the initrd, even
if the driver is the same.

 
 -Shad
 snip sig stuff

-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Agentless Inventory

2009-05-12 Thread Les Mikesell
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 Anyone know of an OS/Software inventory tool that supports Linux and Windows
 that is agentless?

No, but ocsinventory-ng (http://www.ocsinventory-ng.org/) has an agent 
rpm for centos in the epel repository and a remote deployment tool that 
makes putting it on windows and other linux versions fairly painless.

The server is yum-able from 
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2009/04/21/ocsinventory-1.02-1-en
(epel must also be enabled).

If you want more than just computers in your inventory, it also 
integrates with  http://glpi-project.org/?lang=en

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Calendar server

2009-05-12 Thread Frank Thommen
Scott Silva wrote:
 on 5-12-2009 4:24 AM Max Hetrick spake the following:
 Scott Silva wrote:

 [...]

 I had looked at Horde some time ago, but brushed it off. I think I'll 
 check it out though again and get it up and running.

 Thanks!
 Max
 Most of my users seem OK with it. I was running it side by side with roundcube
 as a test, and most users seem to like the extra bits. Besides, horde keeps
 compatibility with less than brand new PHP versions, but Roundcube insists you
 have the newest PHP installed everytime they generate a new version. I just
 can't hack a production server every few months at the whim of developers that
 want to play in a new sandbox every week.


As far as I know, Horde/IMP doesn't play well with mailboxes that 
contain square brackets in their name (which is a common pattern for 
maillist mailboxes at our site...).  They are always reported as being 
empty and one cannot move/copy mails to them.

frank




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread Chris Boyd

On May 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, William L. Maltby wrote:

 For the OP's situation, might need to search a little further to get  
 to
 the same results. But I think it's surely something in the initrd,  
 even
 if the driver is the same.

OK, so two hits on initrd, I'll go and read up on that.

Just to be clear, it could still be an initrd issue even if the card  
was working with one drive attached?

--Chris

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Heller
At Tue, 12 May 2009 11:43:54 -0500 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org 
wrote:

 
 
 On May 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, William L. Maltby wrote:
 
  For the OP's situation, might need to search a little further to get  
  to
  the same results. But I think it's surely something in the initrd,  
  even
  if the driver is the same.
 
 OK, so two hits on initrd, I'll go and read up on that.
 
 Just to be clear, it could still be an initrd issue even if the card  
 was working with one drive attached?

Yes.  You 'got away' with it when you set it up because the driver
modules, etc. where loaded into the running system during the set it
process.  When you rebooted, the driver modules, etc. were not loaded
or other aspects of the run time environment were not set up.  Updating
the initrd would make sure that the run time environment is properly
initialized early in the boot up process, whether this means loading
driver modules or performing other sorts of set up procedues (such as
scanning for LVM volumes).

 
 --Chris
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 

-- 
Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933
Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System
http://www.deepsoft.com/  -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows
hel...@deepsoft.com   -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/
  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Agentless Inventory

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
 Anyone know of an OS/Software inventory tool that supports Linux and Windows
 that is agentless?

If it is agentless how does it gain the information? You can manually
enter items into GLPI (which works with OCS-ng) but pretty much
everything automatic requires some sort of agent (using the definition
that SNMP is an agent).


 Thanks,
 jlc
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Calendar server

2009-05-12 Thread Max Hetrick
Scott Silva wrote:

 Most of my users seem OK with it. I was running it side by side with roundcube
 as a test, and most users seem to like the extra bits. Besides, horde keeps
 compatibility with less than brand new PHP versions, but Roundcube insists you
 have the newest PHP installed everytime they generate a new version. I just
 can't hack a production server every few months at the whim of developers that
 want to play in a new sandbox every week.
 
 Squirrelmail is supposed to have many addons like shared addressbooks and
 calendars, but it seems that many of the apps don't play well with others. I
 gave up on trying to get them to work.
 
 As for IMAP access, Horde is fine. It will also work with other backends like
 Kolab if you so choose. I also didn't want to use Zimbra because I run my own
 spam and virus scanning, and I didn't want to downgrade to what Zimbra
 thinks works. And Horde has been around for a long time, and seems to stay
 current. The devels are very active, and patches come out regularly.

I have it up and running already on a test machine. Seems pretty 
straight-forward. I found a nice guide to installing and configuring it 
on the Horde wiki, actually. Perhaps someone else can benefit from it as 
well.

http://wiki.horde.org/CentOS5InstallationNotes

I'm pretty impressed so far. Another thing about Zimbra that I don't 
like is that it keeps all of it's mail stores in some strange numbered 
format. You can just access a user's mailbox by name, which could be an 
issue down the road with restoring backups, etc.

In this instance, Horde would just replace SquirrelMail, or for that 
matter, they could run side-by-side if so desired. Squirrelmail has been 
great for my organization for quite a few years, but it's just time for 
something a bit more suited to groupware-like use.

Plus, we have an old version of PHP Groupware as a calendar, and I've 
never liked the package, and I'd like to combine some of these items 
into one package to maintain and worry about.

Thanks again,
Max



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 11:43 -0500, Chris Boyd wrote:
 On May 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, William L. Maltby wrote:
 
  For the OP's situation, might need to search a little further to get  
  to
  the same results. But I think it's surely something in the initrd,  
  even
  if the driver is the same.
 
 OK, so two hits on initrd, I'll go and read up on that.
 
 Just to be clear, it could still be an initrd issue even if the card  
 was working with one drive attached?

IMO, yes (maybe). When the Initial install is done, I think there is
some stuff that is needed in the initrd to find the disk so root can be
mounted. I'm not sure which initrd file contains it, but I think it's
got to be there somewhere. There are some more considerations I had
forgotten.

I'm not that familiar with the (relatively) new device manager stuff,
but I would expect that some reference to the equivalent of sda (or
somesuch - maybe a device manager specific construct?) will be in some
files(s).

There is another possibility? Grub installs a stage2 (IIRC) file that
has specific device in it. That's probably your next point of failure (I
don't recall what your original failure mode was).

A brief reminder: when BIOS picks another disk to boot, or finds another
HD and reshuffles, it rotates the drive assignments. Depending on
where it inserted the new HD (let's assume the new one was inserted as
the first drive), what was 0x80 becomes 0x81, former 0x81 becomes
0x82, etc. These equate to {s/h}da, db, etc.

So, you'll probably have a two-step adjustment. The mkinitrd (might be
nothing in there needing changing because it may work off the grub
passed stuff - I don't recall) and a re-install of grub to get the new
stage2 (IIRC). Look also at the /boot/grub/menu.lst - might need
something in there.

Last, you may need to look at /etc/fstab.

I'm sorry I can't be more specific - it's been too long since I worked
with this stuff.

Best I can do w/o actual reading/experimenting is clues.'

 
 --Chris
 snip sig stuff

HTH
-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread William L. Maltby

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 13:32 -0400, William L. Maltby wrote:
 snip

 There is another possibility? Grub installs a stage2 (IIRC) file that
 has specific device in it. That's probably your next point of failure (I
 don't recall what your original failure mode was).
 snip

P.S. Don't forget to take advantage of the grub edit and search
capability. That'll help determine the settings for menu.lst like
hd(0,0), hd(1,0), etc.

info grub for the details - two brain cells are occupado.

HTH
-- 
Bill

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Calendar server

2009-05-12 Thread Fabian Arrotin
Bowie Bailey wrote:
 I recently switched to using Thunderbird for my email and installed the 
 Lightning calendar add-on.  Now all I need is a remote calendar server.  
 I just need a simple server to support a few personal calendars and a 
 shared calendar.  Any recommendations for a CentOS / Apache based 
 calendar server?
 

Zarafa (community edition) supports ical (and very soon caldav) and had 
also a webaccess (for mail/calendar/etc ...)
You can sync directly on your mobile devices too with their z-push 
opensource solution
http://www.zarafa.com

-- 
--
Fabian Arrotin
  idea=`grep -i clue /dev/brain`
  test -z $idea  echo sorry, init 6 in progress || sh ./answer.sh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] iso creation with dd

2009-05-12 Thread Al Sparks

 Al Sparks wrote:
 
  I placed a CD in a drive.
 I ran
   sudo dd sudo dd if=/dev/cdrom
  of=HMI_B_Image_File_4-23-09_disk_1.iso
 
  It completed.  I then transferred the ISO file to an XP
 machine, use
 
 What happens when you load that file in an emulator like daemon tools,
 open it with magic iso, or mount it with a loop?
 
 Can you mount the cdrom?
 

After I posted this, I mounted the CD-ROM and the file was also
missing.  I mount the CD on a Windows XP machine, and the file shows
up.

  Sonic to burn the ISO file to another CD, and there was a
 file missing
  (the largest) in the burned CD.
 
 
 I am assuming sonic has the ability to show the cdrom's details, how many
 tracks does it show?
 

I'll take a look.  I've never dug that deep into Sonic.

  Seems like the data got transferred through the dd, but not a file
  name.  What might I be doing wrong?


 Though it may work, I'd never use dd to make an ISO image,
 try mkisofs, see if you have better luck with that.
 
 Except when I KNOW that there is only one track on the cd, and it is a data
 track.
 

 And if you want a block for block copy I'd use cdrdao (don't
 think this is included in standard CentOS distribution).

 nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread mcclnx mcc

We are tried to count how many files belong to certain group. Our system 
administrator told us non-owner can easy change file group name to another.  
I have been tried several combination and never successful (only ROOT can 
change file group to other name).

Does anyone know how no-owner can change file group name?

Thanks.  


  
__
付費才容量無上限?Yahoo!奇摩電子信箱2.0免費給你,信件永遠不必刪! http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
2009/5/12 mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw:
 Does anyone know how no-owner can change file group name?

I believe that is not possible.

What exactly are you trying to accomplish?

Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread nate
mcclnx mcc wrote:

 We are tried to count how many files belong to certain group. Our system
 administrator told us non-owner can easy change file group name to
 another.  I have been tried several combination and never successful (only
 ROOT can change file group to other name).

 Does anyone know how no-owner can change file group name?

If the no-owner user has write access to the file they could
copy the file to a new file name(thus getting ownership of the
file), and overwriting the original file with the new file.

e.g.

[na...@us-cfe002:~]$ ls -l hosts
-rw-r--r--  1 root root 50 May 12 12:17 hosts
[na...@us-cfe002:~]$ cp hosts hosts_new
[na...@us-cfe002:~]$ ls -l hosts_new
-rw-r--r--  1 natea natea 50 May 12 12:18 hosts_new
[na...@us-cfe002:~]$ mv hosts_new hosts
mv: overwrite `hosts', overriding mode 0644? y
[na...@us-cfe002:~]$ ls -l hosts
-rw-r--r--  1 natea natea 50 May 12 12:18 hosts
[na...@us-cfe002:~]$

nate


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread Les Mikesell
nate wrote:
 mcclnx mcc wrote:
 We are tried to count how many files belong to certain group. Our system
 administrator told us non-owner can easy change file group name to
 another.  I have been tried several combination and never successful (only
 ROOT can change file group to other name).

 Does anyone know how no-owner can change file group name?
 
 If the no-owner user has write access to the file they could
 copy the file to a new file name(thus getting ownership of the
 file), and overwriting the original file with the new file.

You need write access in the directory, but only read access to the 
original file to do this.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Agentless Inventory

2009-05-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
If it is agentless how does it gain the information?

With a login with appropriate local rights, for example on
the windows clients a wmi query can return everything you need.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread Chris Boyd

On May 12, 2009, at 12:32 PM, William L. Maltby wrote:

 There is another possibility? Grub installs a stage2 (IIRC) file that
 has specific device in it. That's probably your next point of  
 failure (I
 don't recall what your original failure mode was).

The system boots, grub menu starts, counts down and then starts  
booting the next stage.  Then the kernel panics after sitting at Red  
Hat Nash for a bit. Apparently it can't find one of the LVM disks and  
so can't mount root.

--Chris

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] iso creation with dd

2009-05-12 Thread Phil Schaffner
Al Sparks wrote:
...
 After I posted this, I mounted the CD-ROM and the file was also
 missing.  I mount the CD on a Windows XP machine, and the file shows
 up.

Was it a multi-session CD?  IIRC there can be differences between 
Windows and Linux on handling multi-session.

Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem

2009-05-12 Thread Dick Holland
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:30 +0200, Sorin Srbu wrote:
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf
 Of William L. Maltby
 Sent: Monday, May 11, 2009 8:37 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 nVidia GeForce 7300GS resolution problem
 
  The monitor is OK as it's attached via a KVM switch to another machine -
  also with an nVidia card - and it displays perfectly on that.
 
 Sometime the OS can't read the monitor properly and doesn't set it up
 accordingly. Try connecting the monitor directly to your KVM-switch and let
 the OS rescan it. After, connect it back to the switch. Or just force the
 correct resolution.
 
 HTH.

I've copied the xorg.conf from the working system to the failing one,
and got the same result. 

Thanks for the tips on the KVM - it hadn't occurred to me that it could
be a problem. When I can get to rip the place up, I'll attach the
monitor directly to the machine and see if that solves it.

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions.

-- 
===
Dick Holland
work: dholl...@latentzero.com
home: d...@xegetix.com (PGP Key ID: 0xE362C267)
Skype: dick_at_home
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dickholland
===

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] SOLVED: LVM, SATA controllers and BIOS devices

2009-05-12 Thread Chris Boyd

On May 12, 2009, at 12:32 PM, William L. Maltby wrote:

 IMO, yes (maybe). When the Initial install is done, I think there is
 some stuff that is needed in the initrd to find the disk so root can  
 be
 mounted. I'm not sure which initrd file contains it, but I think it's
 got to be there somewhere. There are some more considerations I had
 forgotten.

Thanks, this gave the the hint I needed.

Looking at the original modprobe.conf file, there was no entry in it  
for the driver for the second SATA controller.

So to recover I booted the install CD in linux rescue mode.

Ran chroot /mnt/sysimage

I added

alias scsi_hostadapter1 sata_promise

to /etc/modprobe.conf

Changed to the /boot directory

mv initrd-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.img initrd-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.old

mkinitrd initrd-2.6.18-128.1.6.el5.img 2.6.18-128.1.6.el5

After that completed, I rebooted and the system came up clean--no fsck  
requested or any other oddities, system-config-lvm seems to be working  
fine.

No mucking about in /etc/fstab was needed.

--Chris
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread Scott Silva
on 5-12-2009 12:38 PM Les Mikesell spake the following:
 nate wrote:
 mcclnx mcc wrote:
 We are tried to count how many files belong to certain group. Our system
 administrator told us non-owner can easy change file group name to
 another.  I have been tried several combination and never successful (only
 ROOT can change file group to other name).

 Does anyone know how no-owner can change file group name?
 If the no-owner user has write access to the file they could
 copy the file to a new file name(thus getting ownership of the
 file), and overwriting the original file with the new file.
 
 You need write access in the directory, but only read access to the 
 original file to do this.
 
But if you only have read access to the original file, can you overwrite it?




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread nate
Scott Silva wrote:

 But if you only have read access to the original file, can you overwrite it?

If you have write access to the directory yes you should be able
to, if you only have read access to the directory I would expect
not.

nate

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I need a little help, trying to search for a line that begins with /dev
and ends with a single digit that I will choose, like 5. I can search for
^/dev and 5$ but I am having trouble forming the combined search pattern
using egrep.

Any ideas?

Thanks!
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hey,

On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 18:11, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
 ^/dev and 5$ but I am having trouble forming the combined search pattern
 using egrep.
 Any ideas?

/dev.*5$

?

HTH,
Filipe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
/dev.*5$

Thanks, I don't know what I was thinking. Been looking at this script
too long and I wanna go home:) I got it anyway with grep '^/dev.*1$'
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Nichols
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 I need a little help, trying to search for a line that begins with /dev
 and ends with a single digit that I will choose, like 5. I can search for
 ^/dev and 5$ but I am having trouble forming the combined search pattern
 using egrep.

If you mean any single digit not preceded by another digit:

^/dev.*[^0-9][0-9]$

-- 
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread nate
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
/dev.*5$

 Thanks, I don't know what I was thinking. Been looking at this script
 too long and I wanna go home:) I got it anyway with grep '^/dev.*1$'

Wouldn't that match something like /dev/sda11 ? I tried a few
variations though didn't figure out the exact syntax(so used to
perl regex) to match exactly 1 number at the end of the line.

nate


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can non-owner change file group setup?

2009-05-12 Thread Robert Nichols
nate wrote:
 Scott Silva wrote:
 
 But if you only have read access to the original file, can you overwrite it?
 
 If you have write access to the directory yes you should be able
 to, if you only have read access to the directory I would expect
 not.

Technically, that's not overwriting.  That's removing the original and
replacing it with another file with the same name.  That difference
would be significant if there where other hard links to the original
file.

-- 
Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] regex help

2009-05-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Wouldn't that match something like /dev/sda11 ? I tried a few
variations though didn't figure out the exact syntax(so used to
perl regex) to match exactly 1 number at the end of the line.

Yup, but the script cleans the disc and makes 6 partitions so  I
am safe. OTOH, there is a portion which handles another case where
that could be an issue, thanks for pointing that out!

jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


  1   2   >