[CentOS] Dealing with backscatter
Hi all, I've had to deal with a sudden surge of backscatter email lately. Would anyone be able to suggest to solutions that worked for them regarding this problem? We are using Scalix 11 as our email platform. It uses Sendmail MTA for those who may not be familiar. Thanks, Matt -- Stand before it and there is no beginning. Follow it and there is no end. Stay with the ancient Tao, Move with the present. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mdadm RAID sync speed limitation?
Tim Nelson wrote:
> to or higher than the limit. Is this limit arbitrary? Based on detected
> system specs? Limitation of mdadm itself?
>From the docs..
http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/md.txt
453sync_speed_min
454sync_speed_max
455 This are similar to /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_{min,max}
456 however they only apply to the particular array.
457 If no value has been written to these, of if the word 'system'
458 is written, then the system-wide value is used. If a value,
459 in kibibytes-per-second is written, then it is used.
460 When the files are read, they show the currently active value
461 followed by "(local)" or "(system)" depending on whether it is
462 a locally set or system-wide value.
Much higher end systems probably aren't running software
raid in any case. I can't imagine using it myself for more
than a few disks, the inconvenience alone of having to worry
about keeping boot records intact or manually re-syncing
is enough to keep me on hardware raid, which hasn't really
ever let me down over several hundred controllers over the
past many years(I only use good controllers though).
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mdadm RAID sync speed limitation?
While creating some arrays this evening, I noticed this line my dmesg: md: using maximum available idle IO bandwidth (but not more than 20 KB/sec) for reconstruction. Why is there a 200MBps limitation on the mdadm sync speed? It certainly isn't a concern for my particular systems (15k U320 SCSI) but I can imagine there are much higher end systems that actually could sync at a rate equal to or higher than the limit. Is this limit arbitrary? Based on detected system specs? Limitation of mdadm itself? Just curious. --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] perl woes - perl-file-Temp conflict
Hi all, everytime I play with perl I end up falling on my face. Yesterday, new perl modules available from rf (my chosen repo for perl, perl is excluded from my CentOS-Base), however it did not like an already installed perl-File-Temp, so not recalling it was necessary for my mail system I removed it and allowed the updates. Then when I discovered my mail system no longer working (amavisd installed as per centos wiki) I tried to re-install - finally using --force - but now I have two Temp.pm files and the one I need is not found. Why is it that perl has this really messy structure and allows multiple files / methods of the same name, and thus tripping up the unsuspecting. Now I'm lost as to how to unwind and remove the necessary files from yesterdays update so I can reinstall perl-File-Temp? the error message :- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of perl-File-Temp-0.22-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 From this it appears that the base perl is in conflict, yet yesterdays updated perl files were Jul 26 23:34:17 Updated: perl-DBI-1.609-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:22 Updated: perl-Net-DNS-0.65-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:35 Updated: perl-HTML-Parser-3.61-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:37 Updated: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:41 Updated: perl-Net-SSLeay-1.35-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:42 Installed: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.25-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:43 Updated: 1:perl-Convert-UUlib-1.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:45 Updated: perl-Digest-SHA1-2.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:05 Updated: perl-DBD-mysql-4.012-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:06 Installed: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:09 Installed: perl-Digest-SHA-5.47-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:30 Installed: perl-IO-Compress-2.020-2.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:32 Installed: perl-Mail-DKIM-0.36-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:42 Updated: perl-Package-Constants-0.02-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:43 Updated: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:36:52 Updated: perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-Compress-Zlib Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Base Jul 26 23:39:06 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Zlib So how do I rewind and get it straight? lost in the maze of perls begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
On Jul 27, 2009, at 6:28 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > > Am 28.07.2009 um 03:23 schrieb Robert Heller: > >> >> Right. The other option, if there is some specific thing you need >> changed is to grab the source RPM and tweek the .spec file and >> include >> your own patch(es). Keep the patch(es), along with a patch file for >> the >> .spec file someplace, so you can patch future versions. But Ian is >> right: you need a really good reason NOT to just use the distro >> provided >> RPM, along with whatever extras from EPEL (or rpmforge, etc.) you >> might >> need. Also: check out CentOSPlus as well, if you need more bleeding >> edge or whatever. > > > > > Ever tried moving the install-location to /usr/local by changing the > spec-file? > > Last time I looked, there was so much hard-coded stuff in the spec- > file that it was almost impossible to change. Right - that's kind of the point. If you want to customize your Apache build, then the spec file modification route is the way to go, though you should really know what you're doing and why. If all you want to do is build a non-CentOS/upstream-supplied Apache module, then building an rpm for it is the best way. Failing that, you can use Apache's built-in tool for DSO building: apxs, which is part of the httpd-devel package. Of course, if you want to build everything from source, this may not be the optimum distro for you and you may wish to explore Gentoo...;) -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help with Intel Driver
Hi People I have a machine with a Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller lspci 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82Q35 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) The xorg.conf is configured to use the "intel' driver and I need to enable 3D Support with DRI.So my question is, Is this possible with the latest updates in CentOS 5 ? At first I believed that this would just involve enabling DRI so I added two sections to the xorg.conf Section "Module" Load "glx" Load "dri" EndSection Section "DRI" Mode 0666 EndSection Upon restarting X glx and dri appear to load but running the command glxinfo | grep rendering I still get direct rendering: No. Some initial research suggests that the "intel' driver may be 2D only? and that building a newer version of the driver from the Intel site is not a straight forward thing to do. Does anyone have any suggestions on how I can get the functionality I need going? Or should I just look at replacing this card with something from Nvidia ? Thank you for any insite you can offer. To see xorg.conf and X log go to http://www.scms.waikato.ac.nz/~clintd/intel/ Sorry if this turns up as a duplicate, I didn't see the message come thorugh so resent The original MIME headers for this attachment are: Content-Type: text/plain; name="xorg.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xorg.conf" The original MIME headers for this attachment are: Content-Type: text/x-log; name="Xorg.0.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Xorg.0.log" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Am 28.07.2009 um 03:23 schrieb Robert Heller: > > Right. The other option, if there is some specific thing you need > changed is to grab the source RPM and tweek the .spec file and include > your own patch(es). Keep the patch(es), along with a patch file for > the > .spec file someplace, so you can patch future versions. But Ian is > right: you need a really good reason NOT to just use the distro > provided > RPM, along with whatever extras from EPEL (or rpmforge, etc.) you > might > need. Also: check out CentOSPlus as well, if you need more bleeding > edge or whatever. Ever tried moving the install-location to /usr/local by changing the spec-file? Last time I looked, there was so much hard-coded stuff in the spec- file that it was almost impossible to change. Rainer ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
At Mon, 27 Jul 2009 16:11:36 -0700 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:06 -0700, Al Sparks wrote: > > Perhaps I can use that to determine what ./configure options to use when > > compiling, but really, I don't see any differences in the two except some > > directory paths, and APR version (the CentOS version uses APR 1.3.0 and my > > version uses APR 1.2.7). > > > > I actually did look into specifying > > --with-apr=PATH prefix for installed APR or the full path to > > apr-config > >--with-apr-util=PATHprefix for installed APU or the full path to > > > > I'll give it a try. > >=== Al > > If you compile your own apache, you lose *ALL* of the patches that > upstream has put in place, and you break the rpm-listed definition of > what the apache package is. Doesn't sound like a big deal now, right? > Wait until later... you'll definitely regret it... EPEL or apxs would be > the way to go for this... Right. The other option, if there is some specific thing you need changed is to grab the source RPM and tweek the .spec file and include your own patch(es). Keep the patch(es), along with a patch file for the .spec file someplace, so you can patch future versions. But Ian is right: you need a really good reason NOT to just use the distro provided RPM, along with whatever extras from EPEL (or rpmforge, etc.) you might need. Also: check out CentOSPlus as well, if you need more bleeding edge or whatever. > > -I > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] fixed perl woes - perl-file-Temp conflict
Rob Kampen wrote: Rob Kampen wrote: Hi all, everytime I play with perl I end up falling on my face. Yesterday, some new perl modules available from rf (my chosen repo for perl, perl is excluded from my CentOS-Base), however it did not like an already installed perl-File-Temp, so not recalling it was necessary for my mail system I removed it and allowed the updates. Then when I discovered my mail system no longer working (amavisd installed as per centos wiki) I tried to re-install - finally using --force - but now I have two Temp.pm files and the one I need is not found. Why is it that perl has this really messy structure and allows multiple files / methods of the same name, and thus tripping up the unsuspecting. Now I'm lost as to how to unwind and remove the necessary files from yesterdays update so I can reinstall perl-File-Temp? the error message :- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of perl-File-Temp-0.22-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 From this it appears that the base perl is in conflict, yet yesterdays updated perl files were Jul 26 23:34:17 Updated: perl-DBI-1.609-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:22 Updated: perl-Net-DNS-0.65-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:35 Updated: perl-HTML-Parser-3.61-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:37 Updated: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:41 Updated: perl-Net-SSLeay-1.35-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:42 Installed: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.25-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:43 Updated: 1:perl-Convert-UUlib-1.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:45 Updated: perl-Digest-SHA1-2.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:05 Updated: perl-DBD-mysql-4.012-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:06 Installed: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:09 Installed: perl-Digest-SHA-5.47-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:30 Installed: perl-IO-Compress-2.020-2.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:32 Installed: perl-Mail-DKIM-0.36-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:42 Updated: perl-Package-Constants-0.02-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:43 Updated: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:36:52 Updated: perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-Compress-Zlib Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Base Jul 26 23:39:06 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Zlib I tried to remove perl-IO* but it wants to remove most of my machine and I cannot allow that. So how do I rewind and get it straight? lost in the maze of perls ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Further looking at both my mail servers makes me even more confused. One is i686 the other x64_86. The one having problems is the i686. They both have rpmforge set up for perl and both up to date. the x64_86 does not have nor apparently need perl-File-Temp. both have nearly identical conf files for amavisd (domains differ) so why does the i686 machine look for Temp.pm with a seek function but the 64bit doesn't? confused now I guess I need to check version numbers ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I found that the perl-MIME-tools package I had was from another repo, replaced with rf version and all is well. problem was an enable=0 in the yum.repo.d repo file rather than enabled=0 begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:rkam...@kampensonline.com tel;work:407-896-9556 x6344 tel;fax:407-896-7607 tel;home:407-876-4854 tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problems with Broadcom 4312 wireless
Milos Blazevic wrote: > Hello David, > > In brief, I've solved this problem on my Dell Inspiron 1525 (with > Broadcom 4312 wireless card), so I figured letting You know would be > nice, 'cause it didn't seem like the issue is resolved. > > Visit this link: > http://jomcode.com/fadhil/?p=59 > > and in addition check out the comment on the same page by Andre Kiepe to > have the modules load on boot. > > > > Best Regards, > Milos. > I'm not overly familiar with broadcom wireless (always tried to avoid it), but we can probably package wl.ko as a kABI-tracking kmod for el5 over at ELRepo.org if you're interested? This would remove the need to recompile the driver from source for every kernel update, not to mention provide a user friendly RPM package for yum. Also, does this driver require firmware, and if so where does one obtain that? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 16:06 -0700, Al Sparks wrote: > Perhaps I can use that to determine what ./configure options to use when > compiling, but really, I don't see any differences in the two except some > directory paths, and APR version (the CentOS version uses APR 1.3.0 and my > version uses APR 1.2.7). > > I actually did look into specifying > --with-apr=PATH prefix for installed APR or the full path to > apr-config >--with-apr-util=PATHprefix for installed APU or the full path to > > I'll give it a try. >=== Al If you compile your own apache, you lose *ALL* of the patches that upstream has put in place, and you break the rpm-listed definition of what the apache package is. Doesn't sound like a big deal now, right? Wait until later... you'll definitely regret it... EPEL or apxs would be the way to go for this... -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Al Sparks wrote: > > Perhaps I can use that to determine what ./configure options to use when > compiling, but really, I don't see any differences in the two except some > directory paths, and APR version (the CentOS version uses APR 1.3.0 and my > version uses APR 1.2.7). > > I actually did look into specifying > --with-apr=PATH prefix for installed APR or the full path to > apr-config >--with-apr-util=PATHprefix for installed APU or the full path to > > I'll give it a try. It's been a little while since I compiled any apache modules but last time I tried it on CentOS, provided the devel packages were installed it worked without any issues.. nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 14:09 -0700, Al Sparks wrote: > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. That'll pretty much break the apache rpm installation... > And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that > to work. If you stick with the rpm-based Apache installation, it might be as simple as: yum install httpd-devel apxs -cia mod_security.c as listed on: http://www.modsecurity.org/documentation/modsecurity-apache/1.9.3/modsecurity-manual.html#02-installation Of course, you could also grab the RPMS from EPEL... http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/x86_64/mod_security-2.5.9-1.el5.x86_64.rpm > It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the > ./configure. That'll be in the SPEC file from the source rpm... also, I believe that be default, you don't get the server-info page unless you're coming in from localhost. -I ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Perhaps I can use that to determine what ./configure options to use when compiling, but really, I don't see any differences in the two except some directory paths, and APR version (the CentOS version uses APR 1.3.0 and my version uses APR 1.2.7). I actually did look into specifying --with-apr=PATH prefix for installed APR or the full path to apr-config --with-apr-util=PATHprefix for installed APU or the full path to I'll give it a try. === Al - Original Message From: Kwan Lowe To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 1:28:45 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3? On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. > > And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that > to work. > > It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the > ./configure. Oh.. and another option: /usr/sbin/httpd -V That will show the compiled options.. :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problems with Broadcom 4312 wireless
Hello David, In brief, I've solved this problem on my Dell Inspiron 1525 (with Broadcom 4312 wireless card), so I figured letting You know would be nice, 'cause it didn't seem like the issue is resolved. Visit this link: http://jomcode.com/fadhil/?p=59 and in addition check out the comment on the same page by Andre Kiepe to have the modules load on boot. Best Regards, Milos. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Al Sparks wrote: > > Option 1 doesn't work on a new CentOS install of the web server. > > I did have to use http://localhost to get the standard CentOS web page up. I believe that page is served up as an 'ErrorDocument' rather than a documentroot. You can download the SRPM from one of the mirrors, I usually just browse to the mirror directly instead of using yum out of habbit http://mirrors.kernel.org/centos/5/updates/SRPMS/httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.src.rpm What are you looking for in the configure specifically? nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Option 1 doesn't work on a new CentOS install of the web server. I did have to use http://localhost to get the standard CentOS web page up. I went through the /var/www/html directory, and there was nothing there. So I don't know where they put them. Adding the "server-info" to the URL gives me 404. Option 2 gives me: Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirrors.bluehost.com * updates: mirror.unl.edu * addons: mirror.unl.edu * extras: www.cyberuse.com No source RPM found for httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.x86_64 No source RPM found for httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.1.x86_64 No source RPM found for httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2.x86_64 Nothing to download === Al - Original Message From: Kwan Lowe To: CentOS mailing list Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 1:26:07 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3? On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. > > And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that > to work. > > It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the > ./configure. There are a couple approaches that may work: 1) Browse to http://your.server.name/server-info If you haven't disabled it, it will show the server configuration. 2) Grab the sources and check it directly: yumdownloader --source httpd rpm -ivh http-.src.rpm cd /YOURRPMBUILDDIR/SPECS look at the httpd.spec file in the configure section ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] perl woes - perl-file-Temp conflict
Rob Kampen wrote: Hi all, everytime I play with perl I end up falling on my face. Yesterday, some new perl modules available from rf (my chosen repo for perl, perl is excluded from my CentOS-Base), however it did not like an already installed perl-File-Temp, so not recalling it was necessary for my mail system I removed it and allowed the updates. Then when I discovered my mail system no longer working (amavisd installed as per centos wiki) I tried to re-install - finally using --force - but now I have two Temp.pm files and the one I need is not found. Why is it that perl has this really messy structure and allows multiple files / methods of the same name, and thus tripping up the unsuspecting. Now I'm lost as to how to unwind and remove the necessary files from yesterdays update so I can reinstall perl-File-Temp? the error message :- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of perl-File-Temp-0.22-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 From this it appears that the base perl is in conflict, yet yesterdays updated perl files were Jul 26 23:34:17 Updated: perl-DBI-1.609-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:22 Updated: perl-Net-DNS-0.65-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:35 Updated: perl-HTML-Parser-3.61-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:37 Updated: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:41 Updated: perl-Net-SSLeay-1.35-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:42 Installed: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.25-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:43 Updated: 1:perl-Convert-UUlib-1.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:45 Updated: perl-Digest-SHA1-2.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:05 Updated: perl-DBD-mysql-4.012-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:06 Installed: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:09 Installed: perl-Digest-SHA-5.47-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:30 Installed: perl-IO-Compress-2.020-2.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:32 Installed: perl-Mail-DKIM-0.36-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:42 Updated: perl-Package-Constants-0.02-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:43 Updated: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:36:52 Updated: perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-Compress-Zlib Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Base Jul 26 23:39:06 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Zlib I tried to remove perl-IO* but it wants to remove most of my machine and I cannot allow that. So how do I rewind and get it straight? lost in the maze of perls ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Further looking at both my mail servers makes me even more confused. One is i686 the other x64_86. The one having problems is the i686. They both have rpmforge set up for perl and both up to date. the x64_86 does not have nor apparently need perl-File-Temp. both have nearly identical conf files for amavisd (domains differ) so why does the i686 machine look for Temp.pm with a seek function but the 64bit doesn't? confused now I guess I need to check version numbers begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....
On Jul 27, 2009, at 4:09 PM, Coert Waagmeester > wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:37 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
Hello Roman,
I am running drbd 8.2.6 (the standard centos version)
have you considered to test the drbd-8.3 packages?
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3598
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/{i386,x86_64}/RPMS/
Thank you very much for this tip! It was one very obvious place
where I
did not look yet.
Would it be necessary to still recompile it for the TCP_NODELAY and
such?
I am just making sure, because
http://www.nabble.com/Huge-latency-issue-with-8.2.6-td18947965.html
makes it seem unnecessary.
Why do the repositories provide both DRBD 8.0.x and 8.2.6?
Here is a status update
___
on both hosts I now run from the testing repository:
# rpm -qa | grep drbd
drbd83-8.3.1-5.el5.centos
kmod-drbd83-xen-8.3.1-4.el5.centos
___
Here is my config (slightly condensed):
-
global {
usage-count yes;
}
common {
protocol C;
syncer { rate 50M; }
net {
#allow-two-primaries; }
sndbuf-size 0; }
# disk {no-disk-flushes;
#no-md-flushes; }
startup { wfc-timeout 0 ; }
}
resource xenfilesrv {
device/dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/vg0/xenfilesrv;
meta-disk internal;
on baldur.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.1:7788;
}
on thor.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.2:7788;
}
}
resource xenfilesrvdata {
device/dev/drbd2;
disk /dev/vg0/xenfilesrvdata;
meta-disk internal;
on baldur.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.1:7789;
}
on thor.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.2:7789;
}
}
___
xenfilesrv is a xen domU
in this domU i ran a dd with oflag direct:
-
# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gig.file bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 147.997 seconds, 7.1 MB/s
Just before I ran the dd this popped up in the secondary hosts syslog:
--
Jul 27 21:51:42 thor kernel: drbd2: Method to ensure write ordering:
flush
Jul 27 21:51:42 thor kernel: drbd1: Method to ensure write ordering:
flush
___
What more can I try?
To be quite honest, I have no idea what to do with/ where to find the
TCP_NODELAY socket options..
Use drbd option to disable flush/sync, but understand that during a
power failure or system crash data will not be consistent on disk and
you will need to sync the storage from the other server.
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] perl woes - perl-file-Temp conflict
Hi all, everytime I play with perl I end up falling on my face. Yesterday, some new perl modules available from rf (my chosen repo for perl, perl is excluded from my CentOS-Base), however it did not like an already installed perl-File-Temp, so not recalling it was necessary for my mail system I removed it and allowed the updates. Then when I discovered my mail system no longer working (amavisd installed as per centos wiki) I tried to re-install - finally using --force - but now I have two Temp.pm files and the one I need is not found. Why is it that perl has this really messy structure and allows multiple files / methods of the same name, and thus tripping up the unsuspecting. Now I'm lost as to how to unwind and remove the necessary files from yesterdays update so I can reinstall perl-File-Temp? the error message :- Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/man/man3/File::Temp.3pm.gz from install of perl-File-Temp-0.22-1.el5.rf.noarch conflicts with file from package perl-5.8.8-18.el5_3.1.i386 From this it appears that the base perl is in conflict, yet yesterdays updated perl files were Jul 26 23:34:17 Updated: perl-DBI-1.609-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:22 Updated: perl-Net-DNS-0.65-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:35 Updated: perl-HTML-Parser-3.61-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:37 Updated: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:41 Updated: perl-Net-SSLeay-1.35-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:42 Installed: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.25-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:43 Updated: 1:perl-Convert-UUlib-1.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:34:45 Updated: perl-Digest-SHA1-2.12-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:05 Updated: perl-DBD-mysql-4.012-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:06 Installed: perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.020-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:09 Installed: perl-Digest-SHA-5.47-1.el5.rf.i386 Jul 26 23:35:30 Installed: perl-IO-Compress-2.020-2.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:32 Installed: perl-Mail-DKIM-0.36-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:42 Updated: perl-Package-Constants-0.02-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:35:43 Updated: perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.26-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:36:52 Updated: perl-IO-Zlib-1.10-1.el5.rf.noarch Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-Compress-Zlib Jul 26 23:39:05 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Base Jul 26 23:39:06 Erased: perl-IO-Compress-Zlib I tried to remove perl-IO* but it wants to remove most of my machine and I cannot allow that. So how do I rewind and get it straight? lost in the maze of perls begin:vcard fn:Rob Kampen n:Kampen;Rob email;internet:r...@kampensonline.net tel;cell:407-341-3815 version:2.1 end:vcard ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. > > And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that > to work. > > It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the > ./configure. Oh.. and another option: /usr/sbin/httpd -V That will show the compiled options.. :) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 17:09, Al Sparks wrote: > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. Why would you want to do that? CentOS 5.3 already ships Apache 2.2 packaged as an RPM. > But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that to work. I think you mean ModSecurity (http://www.modsecurity.org/), right? If that's the case, the latest version mod_security-2.5.9 is available from EPEL. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Al Sparks wrote: > > I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. > > And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that > to work. > > It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the > ./configure. There are a couple approaches that may work: 1) Browse to http://your.server.name/server-info If you haven't disabled it, it will show the server configuration. 2) Grab the sources and check it directly: yumdownloader --source httpd rpm -ivh http-.src.rpm cd /YOURRPMBUILDDIR/SPECS look at the httpd.spec file in the configure section ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] What's the configure specs for the generic Apache install of CentOS x86_64 5.3?
I'm trying to install apache 2.2.x from a tarball. And it works. But I'm also trying to install modsecure, and I can't get that to work. It might help to know what CentOS uses to install Apache when doing the ./configure. === Al ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:37 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> >
> > >> Hello Roman,
> > >>
> > >> I am running drbd 8.2.6 (the standard centos version)
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > have you considered to test the drbd-8.3 packages?
> >
> > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3598
> >
> > http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/{i386,x86_64}/RPMS/
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Alexander
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Thank you very much for this tip! It was one very obvious place where I
> did not look yet.
>
>
> Would it be necessary to still recompile it for the TCP_NODELAY and
> such?
>
> I am just making sure, because
> http://www.nabble.com/Huge-latency-issue-with-8.2.6-td18947965.html
> makes it seem unnecessary.
>
> Why do the repositories provide both DRBD 8.0.x and 8.2.6?
>
> Thank you all again,
> Coert
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello all,
Here is a status update
___
on both hosts I now run from the testing repository:
# rpm -qa | grep drbd
drbd83-8.3.1-5.el5.centos
kmod-drbd83-xen-8.3.1-4.el5.centos
___
Here is my config (slightly condensed):
-
global {
usage-count yes;
}
common {
protocol C;
syncer { rate 50M; }
net {
#allow-two-primaries; }
sndbuf-size 0; }
# disk {no-disk-flushes;
#no-md-flushes; }
startup { wfc-timeout 0 ; }
}
resource xenfilesrv {
device/dev/drbd1;
disk /dev/vg0/xenfilesrv;
meta-disk internal;
on baldur.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.1:7788;
}
on thor.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.2:7788;
}
}
resource xenfilesrvdata {
device/dev/drbd2;
disk /dev/vg0/xenfilesrvdata;
meta-disk internal;
on baldur.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.1:7789;
}
on thor.mydomain.local {
address 10.99.99.2:7789;
}
}
___
xenfilesrv is a xen domU
in this domU i ran a dd with oflag direct:
-
# dd if=/dev/zero of=1gig.file bs=1M count=1000 oflag=direct
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 147.997 seconds, 7.1 MB/s
Just before I ran the dd this popped up in the secondary hosts syslog:
--
Jul 27 21:51:42 thor kernel: drbd2: Method to ensure write ordering:
flush
Jul 27 21:51:42 thor kernel: drbd1: Method to ensure write ordering:
flush
___
What more can I try?
To be quite honest, I have no idea what to do with/ where to find the
TCP_NODELAY socket options..
Kind regards,
Coert
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
> If I recall, but I'll look back, I quoted the exact message output from > the run of cron.weekly, but here it is again:: > > # ./makewhatis.cron > cat: /usr/share/man/man3/s: No such file or directory > Read file error: /usr/share/man/man3/s No such file or directory > cat: Net::DNS: No such file or directory > Read file error: Net::DNS No such file or directory > > And the other cron job in that subdir is: 0anacron. > This looks suspiciously like you're trying to run a crontab file as a script. Can you post the output of: cat makewhatis.cron ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Sam Drinkard wrote: > # ./makewhatis.cron > cat: /usr/share/man/man3/s: No such file or directory > Read file error: /usr/share/man/man3/s No such file or directory > cat: Net::DNS: No such file or directory > Read file error: Net::DNS No such file or directory Look what's in /usr/share/man/man3/ See if there are any files or directories in there with spaces in them that start with a lower case s ? Just a guess.. I disable makewhatis on my systems, I don't use the database, and I don't need the I/O bogging down on my VMs when it runs(I also disable it on physical systems for consistency) nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 21:16, Sam Drinkard wrote: > >> I get this one every week when /etc/cron.weekly runs. >> > > Which one? You never included the error message you actually have... > Please re-read your original e-mail, and post the exact error message > you have, and also where you get it (e-mail from cron?). > > HTH, > Filipe > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > If I recall, but I'll look back, I quoted the exact message output from the run of cron.weekly, but here it is again:: # ./makewhatis.cron cat: /usr/share/man/man3/s: No such file or directory Read file error: /usr/share/man/man3/s No such file or directory cat: Net::DNS: No such file or directory Read file error: Net::DNS No such file or directory And the other cron job in that subdir is: 0anacron. cat 0anacron #!/bin/sh # anacron's script # This script updates anacron time stamps. It is called through run-parts either by anacron itself or by cron # The scrips is called "0anacron" to assure that is will be executed # _before_ all other scripts. # Don't run anacron if this script is called by anacron. if [ ! -e /var/run/anacron.pid]; then anacron -u cron.weekly. fi The error message is logged within the daily log file, but of course, only once a week. Two problems: Net::DNS IS installed, and what the hell is the "s". Try googling for "s" or even the error message zilch for me. As I mentioned earlier, I know of no other effects this failure has, but knowing something has run amok does not make happy. Ok.. maybe have fixed it on my own. Under the man page for makewhatis, there are some options that can be passed. The server had an "s" and my desktop has a "w" as the option. I changed them to opposites, so if one works and the desktop gives the same error message, then I guess the problem is solved. we'll see... Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Graphic card question for CentOS 5.3
Hello, just a short hardware question. Does CentOS 5.3 supports a Leadtek LR2960 (model S26361-D1910-V128, agp, 128mb) graphic card with a nVidia GeForce FX5200 chip and dual dvi? Thank you very much! regards Olaf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple resource manager?
Hi, On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 14:22, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > I have worked with SGE but it requires NFS I believe it is possible to set up SGE without any NFS at all. On the other hand, you will have to handle the distribution of the scripts and programs you want to run on your grid anyway, so you will probably need NFS set up for that... Have a look at GXP, it seems to be exactly what you are looking for: http://www.logos.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp/gxp/index.php?FrontPage You can also look at SQS, it seems to be very simple: http://sqs.sourceforge.net/ GXP looks more powerful, though. As another post suggested, there is Torque, which is similar to SGE and probably has similar requirements. And there is also Condor, which does not need NFS but is more complex (does checkpoints, etc.): http://www.cs.wisc.edu/condor/ Then there are the commercial ones, of which Platform LSF seems to be the more complete one, but as you are looking for something simple, I recommend you look at the above first. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple resource manager?
Hi, have a look at Torque (http://www.clusterresources.com/products/torque-resource-manager.php) It might be a bit overkill, but it might also suit your needs :) Regards, Michel On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 15:22 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: > I need to serialize computing job requests for two different multicore > machines, and in some near future, for a cluster. I have worked with > SGE but it requires NFS and other administrative steps, plus it seems > a bit overkill for my needs. I guess some simpler queue managing > engine may have been developed, possibly over SSH. Any pointers? TIA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?
Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 at 1:19pm, Veiko Kukk wrote > >>> I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a >>> *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. >> There are no settings in BIOS for AHCI mode, it's only possible to >> choose between raid and sata controller mode, i have chosen sata mode. > > Check to see if there's a BIOS update on HP's site. I had some DL160s > with an old BIOS with no option for AHCI mode. After upgrading to the > most recent BIOS, the option was there. > Yes, AHCI support requires both hardware and BIOS to support it. Even if the hardware supports it, if the vendor has chosen not to implement it in the BIOS then there's nothing you can do. Sounds like a BIOS update will add AHCI support for you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Simple resource manager?
I need to serialize computing job requests for two different multicore machines, and in some near future, for a cluster. I have worked with SGE but it requires NFS and other administrative steps, plus it seems a bit overkill for my needs. I guess some simpler queue managing engine may have been developed, possibly over SSH. Any pointers? TIA. -- Eduardo Grosclaude Universidad Nacional del Comahue Neuquen, Argentina ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?
On Mon, 27 Jul 2009 at 1:19pm, Veiko Kukk wrote >> I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a >> *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. > > There are no settings in BIOS for AHCI mode, it's only possible to > choose between raid and sata controller mode, i have chosen sata mode. Check to see if there's a BIOS update on HP's site. I had some DL160s with an old BIOS with no option for AHCI mode. After upgrading to the most recent BIOS, the option was there. -- Joshua Baker-LePain QB3 Shared Cluster Sysadmin UCSF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Sam Drinkard wrote: > Alan Sparks wrote: > >> Sam Drinkard wrote: >> >> NET::DNS is a core perl module. You don't want to get any version from CPAN. $locate DNS.pm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS.pm >> I don't believe on CentOS this is a "core" module. Try a Yum install of >> perl-Net-DNS (in the base repository). >> -Alan >> >> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > > Alan, > > The package perl-Net-DNS is already installed and is up do date. > I'm wondering if that command coming from cron.weekly about the "s" file > has anything to do with it? There does not seem to be any ill effects > from the cron job, but it irritates me to see errors and not know why or > how to fix stuff, especially when the keyword is "s" :( Perhaps I > should just remove that particular command from the cron.weekly and see > what happens, or at least comment it out. > > Sam > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > As others have noted, please let us know any details about whatever error you are seeing, we've seen no details yet. -Alan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 53, Issue 7
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2009:1178 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 python -security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2009:1178 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 python - security update (Tru Huynh) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:25:44 +0200 From: Tru Huynh Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1178 Moderate CentOS 3 i386 python -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090727152544.gc14...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1178 python security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1178.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/python-2.2.3-6.11.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/python-devel-2.2.3-6.11.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/python-tools-2.2.3-6.11.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/tkinter-2.2.3-6.11.i386.rpm addons/i386/RPMS/python-docs-2.2.3-6.11.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/python-2.2.3-6.11.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update python\* tkinter Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090727/15bf3295/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:26:24 +0200 From: Tru Huynh Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1178 Moderate CentOS 3 x86_64 python -security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: <20090727152624.gd14...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2009:1178 python security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1178.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/python-2.2.3-6.11.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/python-devel-2.2.3-6.11.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/python-tools-2.2.3-6.11.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/tkinter-2.2.3-6.11.x86_64.rpm addons/x86_64/RPMS/python-docs-2.2.3-6.11.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/python-2.2.3-6.11.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update python\* tkinter Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20090727/ced05600/attachment-0001.bin -- ___ CentOS-announce mailing list centos-annou...@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 53, Issue 7 ** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA DVD Burner / AHCI / CentOS 4.7 (kernel: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL)
At Sun, 26 Jul 2009 17:07:54 -0400 Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, it seems that the kernel I have (stock CentOS 4.7: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL i686) > seems to gronk the nVideo SATA controller in AHCI mode. It is NOT able > to deal with the SATA DVD Burner I have. It is a "Sony Optiarc DVD > Burner with LightScribe Black SATA Model AD-7241S-0B LightScribe > Support". Is there some special magic I need to do? Here is the > relevant bit from the boot up (SATA ports 2-6 are empty at present): > > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:09.0[A] -> GSI 20 > (level, low) -> IRQ 201 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: MSI INIT SUCCESS > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ahci :00:09.0: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 6 > ports 3 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ahci :00:09.0: flags: 64bit ncq led clo > pmp pio > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874100 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874180 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874200 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874280 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata5: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874300 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata6: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0xF8874380 ctl 0x0 > bmdma 0x0 irq 58 > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: scsi1 : ahci > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 > SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, > err_mask=0x104) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 > SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, > err_mask=0x104) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 > SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xa1) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, > err_mask=0x104) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 > SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: scsi2 : ahci > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: scsi3 : ahci > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata3: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: scsi4 : ahci > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: ata4: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:27 sauron kernel: scsi5 : ahci > Jul 26 16:29:28 sauron kernel: ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300) > Jul 26 16:29:28 sauron kernel: scsi6 : ahci > > > I just tried adding 'irqpoll' and this seems to have cured things -- the DVD Burner is detected! I'm guessing it is a case of broken firmware somewhere (which seems to be the purpose of the irqpoll parameter). -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Sam Drinkard wrote on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 10:03:39 -0400: > As for the "exact problem" -- it's an > error message You may not have noticed that you didn't quote that error message. At least not in the messages I got. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install DVD mounted -noexec by default == bad interpreter permission denied
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Hakan Koseoglu wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Dave wrote: >> Installing matlab on Centos5. >> [r...@taro matlab]# bash: /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install: /bin/sh: >> bad interpreter: Permission denied > Sometimes this can happen if the file has Windows-style EOLs and the > interpreter /bin/sh is translated as /bin/sh^M > Indeed, on a Centos 5 here, the sh is in /bin/sh so the script > probably should have worked. > > Check if that is the case. If so, running dos2unix against the shell > script might solve the problem. Please ignore my advice here, it's irrelevant and I should have read the message properly the first time! -- Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install DVD mounted -noexec by default == bad interpreter permission denied
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Dave wrote: > Installing matlab on Centos5. > [r...@taro matlab]# bash: /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install: /bin/sh: > bad interpreter: Permission denied Sometimes this can happen if the file has Windows-style EOLs and the interpreter /bin/sh is translated as /bin/sh^M Indeed, on a Centos 5 here, the sh is in /bin/sh so the script probably should have worked. Check if that is the case. If so, running dos2unix against the shell script might solve the problem. -- Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Hi, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 22:32, Sam Drinkard wrote: > BTW, what is wrong with using cpan? It does not work along with RPM very well... if you mix CPAN with RPM (and you can't avoid RPM considering you need the OS Perl that comes in RPM) a future update of the RPMs might break CPAN-installed packages, or might even break the whole Perl install. If you need Perl modules, I recommend you look into RPMforge, their collection of RPM-packaged Perl modules is great, and if there is anything else you need that is not there you may request it on their mailing list. HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Hi, On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 21:16, Sam Drinkard wrote: > I get this one every week when /etc/cron.weekly runs. Which one? You never included the error message you actually have... Please re-read your original e-mail, and post the exact error message you have, and also where you get it (e-mail from cron?). HTH, Filipe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA DVD Burner / AHCI / CentOS 4.7 (kernel: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL)
At Mon, 27 Jul 2009 12:39:10 +0100 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, it seems that the kernel I have (stock CentOS 4.7: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL > > i686) > > seems to gronk the nVideo SATA controller in AHCI mode. It is NOT able > > to deal with the SATA DVD Burner I have. It is a "Sony Optiarc DVD > > Burner with LightScribe Black SATA Model AD-7241S-0B LightScribe > > Support". Is there some special magic I need to do? Here is the > > relevant bit from the boot up (SATA ports 2-6 are empty at present): > > You could try booting with the boot command line option: > > pci=nomsi > > and see if that helps No effect. Same 'Failed to IDENTIFY' messages. > > James Pearson > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software-- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows hel...@deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] potsfix keeping mail in queue on delivery error
Am Montag, den 27.07.2009, 14:37 +0200 schrieb Robert Grasso: > Hello, > > Our mail server is running CentOS 5.3. I configured postfix with maildrop as > the MDA. I had to deal with a strange issue : a user > sent an email to an alias, which resolves into several internal addresses. > One of these addresses had its mbox filled up (reached > the mailbox_size_limit); so maildrop reported a 0x19 error code to postfix, > who kept the mail in its queue, and repeatedly resent > the email : thus every member of the alias list received many copies of this > email, except of course the one with the filled mbox. > > Is there a way to configure postfix so that it does not resend the > email to the recipients who do not report any error ? We run Postfix + Cyrus and a some of our users are often "over quota". Using virtual alias maps in postfix for aliases, leads to the following effect: the mail is "splitted" by postfix and then requeued for a evety recipient of the alias (not the alias itself). If submission fails (e.g. "over quota"), then the mail stays in the queue and submission is retried regularly. As the mail was already splitted before the submission attempt to the mailbox, only the mail for the mailbox that's failing is kept in the queue. Hope that helps... Regards, Andreas -- Solvention Egermannstr. 6-8 53359 Rheinbach Tel: +49 2226 158179-0 Fax: +49 2226 158179-9 http://www.solvention.de mailto:i...@solvention.de smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
> BTW, what is wrong with using > cpan? I thought they were the most up to date of the perl modules > available, but I rarely ever see anything perl related in a yum > update... maybe I just missed it. Hello Sam: I can't answer the parent question, but I do use CPAN modules quite often. The main difference is that I always convert them to RPM first using the cpan2rpm utility. It takes a few extra steps, but I've found that it makes upgrades and troubleshooting a lot easier. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Sam Drinkard wrote on Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:32:54 -0400: > > >> I don't have a perl version installed at that location. I've >> only added a few modules from cpan. >> > > You have no Perl, but installed modules via CPAN? Digest that. What are > you telling us? > And, btw, you didn't even tell what your actual problem is. Can you please > work on the phrasing of your questions to this list? You seem to be very > reluctant to learn from replies to your earlier questions. > > >> TW, what is wrong with using >> cpan? >> > > You have been using an rpm-based Linux installation long enough to know > that by yourself or to google it up by yourself. > > Kai > > Kai, Yes, I've been using Centos plenty long enough to pickup a few tid-bits of information that have been useful, but a lot of the info passed on the mailing list is either way over my head, or I have no use for it now or in the future. As for the "exact problem" -- it's an error message, and I don't like seeing error messages when I have no clue where to even begin looking besides the source that is causing them. As for learning from earlier questions, yes, as a matter of a fact, I do learn from them, and archive a LOT of threads that deal with things I've seen before or something I feel I might need/use later on. There's nothing wrong with being curious about error messages, I just don't like to see them as I don't know what else might be being affected. As for the cpan, the modules were not available via any repository, hence cpan. All of the modules I grabbbed were for one package and only one package that deals with my weather data and its software. Ever heard of LDM or Gempak.. both required some modules before it would even install, and they were NOT available anywhere else. This software does not get updated but once in a blue moon, and has nothing to do with Centos itself, other than being hosted on it. One last thing.. I don't appreciate one bit you taking jabs at me and my methods. You don't know me, and know even less about how I used my computers. I follow instructions that come with packages I install, not any kind of maybe this or maybe that. So in the future, I'd appreciate it if you'd leave off the jabs and stabs about my knowledge of what I'm doing. I'm no guru by any sort, but if I can't figure something out, I thought the mailing list was where to ask, unless you think every problem ever occured is covered under some form of google... I assure you -- IT"S NOT. Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Alan Sparks wrote: > Sam Drinkard wrote: > >>> NET::DNS is a core perl module. You don't want to get any version from CPAN. >>> >>> $locate DNS.pm >>> /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Net/DNS.pm >>> >>> >>> > > I don't believe on CentOS this is a "core" module. Try a Yum install of > perl-Net-DNS (in the base repository). > -Alan > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Alan, The package perl-Net-DNS is already installed and is up do date. I'm wondering if that command coming from cron.weekly about the "s" file has anything to do with it? There does not seem to be any ill effects from the cron job, but it irritates me to see errors and not know why or how to fix stuff, especially when the keyword is "s" :( Perhaps I should just remove that particular command from the cron.weekly and see what happens, or at least comment it out. Sam ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install DVD mounted -noexec by default == bad interpreter permission denied
Dave wrote: > Installing matlab on Centos5. > > command I typed: > > /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install & > > Error message I received: > [1] 10759 > [r...@taro matlab]# bash: /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install: /bin/sh: > bad interpreter: Permission denied > > Google found no hits with this precise error message, but several > similar hits when I leave out the matlab path. > > Solution: > > mount -o remount -o exec /dev/scd0 > > (scd0 is the drive where the DVD is inserted.) > > Hope this helps someone with the same problem. You could have probably run the script using: sh /media/MATHWORKS_R2009A/install James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] potsfix keeping mail in queue on delivery error
Hello, Our mail server is running CentOS 5.3. I configured postfix with maildrop as the MDA. I had to deal with a strange issue : a user sent an email to an alias, which resolves into several internal addresses. One of these addresses had its mbox filled up (reached the mailbox_size_limit); so maildrop reported a 0x19 error code to postfix, who kept the mail in its queue, and repeatedly resent the email : thus every member of the alias list received many copies of this email, except of course the one with the filled mbox. Is there a way to configure postfix so that it does not resend the email to the recipients who do not report any error ? Regards --- Robert GRASSO System engineer CEDRAT S.A. 15 Chemin de Malacher - Inovallée - 38246 MEYLAN cedex - FRANCE Phone: +33 (0)4 76 90 50 45 - Fax: +33 (0)4 56 38 08 30 mailto:robert.gra...@cedrat.com - http://www.cedrat.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Compile linux kernel problem
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Hanmo wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I compiled the linux kernel 2.6.18.8 in CentOS 5.3, but when make install, > the system says: > > WARNING: No module sata_nv found for kernel 2.6.18.8, continuing anyway > WARNING: No module sata_nv found for kernel 2.6.18.8, continuing anyway > > Just if I installed RHEL 5 version's nforce driver, it still shows these > warning message. When reboot, it cannot load the system. The linux kernel > package is downloaded from kernel.org directory. > > I tried and google it, but I could not find the answer, does anyone can help > me? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Please visit this page: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos#head-c4dbf9ecb355694c78175c7eaad46a2472a3849b ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA DVD Burner / AHCI / CentOS 4.7 (kernel: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL)
Robert Heller wrote: > OK, it seems that the kernel I have (stock CentOS 4.7: 2.6.9-78.0.22.EL i686) > seems to gronk the nVideo SATA controller in AHCI mode. It is NOT able > to deal with the SATA DVD Burner I have. It is a "Sony Optiarc DVD > Burner with LightScribe Black SATA Model AD-7241S-0B LightScribe > Support". Is there some special magic I need to do? Here is the > relevant bit from the boot up (SATA ports 2-6 are empty at present): You could try booting with the boot command line option: pci=nomsi and see if that helps James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Compile linux kernel problem
Hanmo wrote on Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:35:56 +0800: > Hello everyone, Please stop hijacking threads. If you want to ask something then hit the button "new message". Thanks! Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....
On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 12:02 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
>
> >> Hello Roman,
> >>
> >> I am running drbd 8.2.6 (the standard centos version)
>
>
> Hi,
>
> have you considered to test the drbd-8.3 packages?
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3598
>
> http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/{i386,x86_64}/RPMS/
>
> Best regards
>
> Alexander
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thank you very much for this tip! It was one very obvious place where I
did not look yet.
Would it be necessary to still recompile it for the TCP_NODELAY and
such?
I am just making sure, because
http://www.nabble.com/Huge-latency-issue-with-8.2.6-td18947965.html
makes it seem unnecessary.
Why do the repositories provide both DRBD 8.0.x and 8.2.6?
Thank you all again,
Coert
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?
chandlerc...@gmail.com wrote: > I had to disable it with ahci=no at boot time, have you tried ahci=yes at > boot time of kernel? > --Original Message-- > From: Ned Slider > Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org > To: CentOS mailing list > ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p? > Sent: Jul 27, 2009 5:23 AM > > Veiko Kukk wrote: >> I have one HP Proliant DL320 G5p, where for some reason, the AHCI mode >> is not enabled. According to server specs, it should have AHCI/NCQ >> capability, but ata_piix module gets loaded during bootup, not ahci module. >> Any ideas how to enable AHCI mode? >> > > I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a > *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. There are no settings in BIOS for AHCI mode, it's only possible to choose between raid and sata controller mode, i have chosen sata mode. -- Veiko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] DRBD very slow....
>
> On Mon, 2009-07-27 at 08:30 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
>> Hello Roman,
>>
>> I am running drbd 8.2.6 (the standard centos version)
Hi,
have you considered to test the drbd-8.3 packages?
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3598
http://dev.centos.org/centos/5/testing/{i386,x86_64}/RPMS/
Best regards
Alexander
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?
I had to disable it with ahci=no at boot time, have you tried ahci=yes at boot time of kernel? --Original Message-- From: Ned Slider Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p? Sent: Jul 27, 2009 5:23 AM Veiko Kukk wrote: > I have one HP Proliant DL320 G5p, where for some reason, the AHCI mode > is not enabled. According to server specs, it should have AHCI/NCQ > capability, but ata_piix module gets loaded during bootup, not ahci module. > Any ideas how to enable AHCI mode? > I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Sent on the Now Network� from my Sprint® BlackBerry___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Compile linux kernel problem
Hello everyone, I compiled the linux kernel 2.6.18.8 in CentOS 5.3, but when make install, the system says: WARNING: No module sata_nv found for kernel 2.6.18.8, continuing anyway WARNING: No module sata_nv found for kernel 2.6.18.8, continuing anyway Just if I installed RHEL 5 version's nforce driver, it still shows these warning message. When reboot, it cannot load the system. The linux kernel package is downloaded from kernel.org directory. I tried and google it, but I could not find the answer, does anyone can help me? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.3, no AHCI on HP DL320 G5p?
Veiko Kukk wrote: > I have one HP Proliant DL320 G5p, where for some reason, the AHCI mode > is not enabled. According to server specs, it should have AHCI/NCQ > capability, but ata_piix module gets loaded during bootup, not ahci module. > Any ideas how to enable AHCI mode? > I'm not sure for this particular model server, but normally this is a *BIOS* setting for the SATA controller. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cleaning up some problems
Sam Drinkard wrote on Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:32:54 -0400: > I don't have a perl version installed at that location. I've > only added a few modules from cpan. You have no Perl, but installed modules via CPAN? Digest that. What are you telling us? And, btw, you didn't even tell what your actual problem is. Can you please work on the phrasing of your questions to this list? You seem to be very reluctant to learn from replies to your earlier questions. > TW, what is wrong with using > cpan? You have been using an rpm-based Linux installation long enough to know that by yourself or to google it up by yourself. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
