[CentOS-docs] new wiki article: How to repair a software RAID5 volume with more than one failed disk

2009-08-20 Thread Lev Shamardin
Hi all,

I've finally got some time to finish the second article I've promised
to write some time ago; please read it, any comments are welcome:

http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/Repair_RAID5_Volumes

-- 
Lev.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] newsletter

2009-08-20 Thread Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
Hey

On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:53 PM, fish.firedfish.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is the proof reader ?  Check if there has the pronunciation error?
 Of transalte the document to the local language?

I don't know if I really get what you are trying to ask. A proof
reader is someone who checks if all the spelling and grammar is
correct. Currently the Newsletter is not translated, but I would
really like that to happen :)

Cheers Didi



 2009-08-19
 
 fish.fired
 
 发件人: Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
 发送时间: 2009-08-19  21:25:10
 收件人: Mail list for wiki articles
 抄送:
 主题: Re: [CentOS-docs] newsletter
 Hey
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:05 AM, lostsonlost...@lostsonsvault.org wrote:
 Hey
  I was wondering how i can become a proof reader for the newsletter ? I
 speak and read native english as it says in the wiki.
 Cool. We really need someone like that :) If you tell me your wiki
 name I will add you to the Newsletter group and you can help.
 Cheers Didi
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] newsletter

2009-08-20 Thread Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Marcus Moellerm...@marcus-moeller.de wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:53 PM, fish.firedfish.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is the proof reader ?  Check if there has the pronunciation error?
 Of transalte the document to the local language?

 I don't know if I really get what you are trying to ask. A proof
 reader is someone who checks if all the spelling and grammar is
 correct. Currently the Newsletter is not translated, but I would
 really like that to happen :)

 Thats not the complete truth :) The newsletter is already translated
 to Chinese by Timothy Lee.

We should link to that at the end. And have a translation page somewhere.

Am I correct in assuming that http://wiki.centos.org/zh/Newsletter is the page?

Cheers Didi


 Best Regards
 Marcus
 ___
 CentOS-docs mailing list
 CentOS-docs@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] newsletter

2009-08-20 Thread fish.fired
OK.


2009-08-20 



fish.fired 



发件人: Marcus Moeller 
发送时间: 2009-08-20  21:40:13 
收件人: Mail list for wiki articles 
抄送: 
主题: Re: [CentOS-docs] newsletter 
 
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 3:53 PM, fish.firedfish.fi...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is the proof reader ?  Check if there has the pronunciation error?
 Of transalte the document to the local language?

 I don't know if I really get what you are trying to ask. A proof
 reader is someone who checks if all the spelling and grammar is
 correct. Currently the Newsletter is not translated, but I would
 really like that to happen :)
Thats not the complete truth :) The newsletter is already translated
to Chinese by Timothy Lee.
Best Regards
Marcus
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS-docs] Newsletter help

2009-08-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Ray Leventhalcen...@swhi.net wrote:
   
 Hi,

 I'd be happy to offer my services in proofreading the newsletter if this
 is needed.

 My 'day' job is that of a technical writer and I'm a native english speaker.

 If I can be of help, I'd be happy to.
 

 Hey cool :)

 We really need help. Can you tell me your wiki name and I can add you.

 Cheers Didi


   
Hi Didi,

Wiki name is:  RayLeventhal

Thanks,
-Ray
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


[CentOS-docs] Correction on Multiple Pages in Wiki

2009-08-20 Thread Nick Sklav
Multiple pages keep trying to link to

http://wiki.centos.org/NetworkManager

This page does not exist but the following page does.

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/NetworkManager

Can people referencing NetworkManager correct their Links.

Seems most of the error are in the laptop howtos.

Thank you,

Nick Sklav

___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs


Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

2009-08-20 Thread James Pearson
Johnny Hughes wrote:

 We have the ISO and tree in QA testing at the moment, and all updates
 after the release of 4.8 are also in the QA tree for testing.
 
 There is currently a problem with AMD K2 and the i586 kernel, but that
 should not prevent release.
 
 Once we have received enough feedback that this roll out is good, we can
 move the release into place.

Is it possible to get an update on the status of 4.8?

Thanks

James Pearson

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Bernhard Gschaider wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:47:07 +0200:

 - following the Wiki-Howto to the letter (especially using the
Xen-install-kernels)

Again, I think this is the wrong way to go, it's outdated. I've never done 
it this way and I think this How-To is derived from very old Xen versions 
and got updated a few times over time without changing the basics. It 
*may* work, but it's complicated to follow and overly complex, e.g. you 
can very easily make a tiny mistake and never get going which is highly 
frustrating.

As I wrote, just do a virt-install -p and that's all. No install 
kernels, no creation of an image file, no nothing. virt-install will do 
everything for you. Once the VM has been setup and saved you can create a 
config-file and put it in /etc/xen and then xm create the machine.
Straight-forward and easy. The config-file is going to look like this:
name = d-mini
maxmem = 128
memory = 128
vcpus = 1
bootloader = /usr/bin/pygrub
on_poweroff = destroy
on_reboot = restart
on_crash = restart
#vfb = [ type=vnc,vncdisplay=12,vncunused=1 ]
disk = [ file:/home2/vm/d-minimal.img,xvda,w]
vif = [ mac=00:16:3e:43:18:13 ]

And if you prefer kickstart a (replace with your own data)

virt-install -p --location=ftp:// --noautoconsole --nographics --
file=/.../d-minimal.img --file-size=1 --name=d-mini --ram=256 -x 
ks=ftp://.../minimal-file.ks ip=192.168.1.* netmask=255.255.255.0 
dns=192.168.1.* gateway=192.168.1.*

gets you in business in less than 10 minutes without any manual 
intervention.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] needs help about vps

2009-08-20 Thread ann kok
hi all

anyone have experience about vps

which one is better?

xen vs virtual-box

thank you



  __
Looking for the perfect gift? Give the gift of Flickr! 

http://www.flickr.com/gift/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

2009-08-20 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 08/20/2009 01:22 PM, James Pearson wrote:

 Is it possible to get an update on the status of 4.8?

its going out to the mirrors right now, Depending on how long they take 
to stabalise, we should see release in the next 24 - 48 hrs.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Coert Waagmeester
Hello all,


I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to have 'backups' of
my xen domUs.

Is it necessary to change the xen domains configs to use /dev/drbd*
instead of the LVM volume that drbd mirrors, and which the xen domU runs
of?


regards,
Coert

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Ian Murray


 
 Again, I think this is the wrong way to go, it's outdated. I've never done 
 it this way and I think this How-To is derived from very old Xen versions 
 and got updated a few times over time without changing the basics. It 
 *may* work, but it's complicated to follow and overly complex, e.g. you 
 can very easily make a tiny mistake and never get going which is highly 
 frustrating.

Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me. The Wiki 
described method should work for all RH derived distributions that are Xen PV 
compatible. I tried SME (or it might have been Trixbox... or both!) and it 
installed okay, but the kernel wasn't happy in a Xen world. Could fix it, but 
was lazy and used hardware virtualisation. Personally, I prefer to keep swap on 
a seperate partition, as it makes it easier to mount root. I don't know if that 
is possible under virt-install.

To be honest, I don't really think there are too many shortcuts with Xen, 
because it pays to understand how it works at a lower level, how to mount 
loopbacks, even with LVM's inside them, etc. I can't really remember the 
options under virt-install, but if they do 'dumb things down', then that may 
not be helpful in the long run. 

Anyway, both ways are way more friendly than debootstrapping your Debian 
system. ;o)


 disk = [ file:/home2/vm/d-minimal.img,xvda,w]

I think tap:aio is more favoured than file, for performance reasons.



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] needs help about vps

2009-08-20 Thread Ian Murray




- Original Message 
 From: ann kok oiyan...@yahoo.ca
 To: centos@centos.org
 Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 15:10:09
 Subject: [CentOS] needs help about vps
 
 hi all
 
 anyone have experience about vps
 
 which one is better?
 

Depends what you are trying to do run multiple servers, or just a second 
environment on your workstation plus, pls define 'better'



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] what is RAID background initialization ??

2009-08-20 Thread mcclnx mcc
we have DELL server (CENTOS 4.X) with MD1000 connect on it.  One of Raid5 
(internal 4 disks) has hard disk bad and I replace it.  I saw /var/log/messages 
have following entry:

===
Aug 18 15:33:20 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2049  
Array disk removed:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
Aug 18 15:34:09 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2052  
Array disk inserted:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
Aug 18 15:34:09 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2065  
Array disk Rebuild started:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
Aug 19 00:42:58 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2124  
Redundancy normal:  Virtual Disk 0 (Virtual Disk 0) Controller 1 (PERC 4e/DC)
Aug 19 00:42:58 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2092  
Array disk Rebuild completed:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
Aug 19 00:45:53 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID: 2127  
Background Initialization started:  Virtual Disk 0 (Virtual Disk 0) Controller 
1 (PERC 4e/DC)

=

My questions are:

1. why after disk rebuild there have background initialization?

2. is all kind of configuration (e.g. RAID0, RAID10, ...) need perform 
background initialization?

3. if I run heavy application, will it hurt background initialization and 
disk rebuild?

Thanks.


___ 
 您的生活即時通 - 溝通、娛樂、生活、工作一次搞定! 
 http://messenger.yahoo.com.tw/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Ross Walker
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za 
  wrote:

 Hello all,


 I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to have  
 'backups' of
 my xen domUs.

 Is it necessary to change the xen domains configs to use /dev/drbd*
 instead of the LVM volume that drbd mirrors, and which the xen domU  
 runs
 of?

Yes otherwise the data won't be replicated and your drbd volume will  
be inconsistent and need resync'd.

-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] what is RAID background initialization ??

2009-08-20 Thread Ross Walker
On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:33 AM, mcclnx mcc mcc...@yahoo.com.tw wrote:

 we have DELL server (CENTOS 4.X) with MD1000 connect on it.  One of  
 Raid5 (internal 4 disks) has hard disk bad and I replace it.  I saw / 
 var/log/messages have following entry:

 ===
 Aug 18 15:33:20 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2049  Array disk removed:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
 Aug 18 15:34:09 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2052  Array disk inserted:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1, Connector 0
 Aug 18 15:34:09 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2065  Array disk Rebuild started:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1,  
 Connector 0
 Aug 19 00:42:58 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2124  Redundancy normal:  Virtual Disk 0 (Virtual Disk 0) Controller  
 1 (PERC 4e/DC)
 Aug 19 00:42:58 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2092  Array disk Rebuild completed:  Array Disk 0:11 Controller 1,  
 Connector 0
 Aug 19 00:45:53 host1 Server Administrator: Storage Service EventID:  
 2127  Background Initialization started:  Virtual Disk 0 (Virtual  
 Disk 0) Controller 1 (PERC 4e/DC)

 =

 My questions are:

 1. why after disk rebuild there have background initialization?

The rebuild resilvers the new disk based on the existing parity  
information while the second pass updates segments based on new parity  
information that may have been written before the resilver process  
finished, for a RAID1 it would be to mirror blocks that were updated  
during the rebuild.

This is because a disk doesn't participate in an array until it is  
rebuilt.


 2. is all kind of configuration (e.g. RAID0, RAID10, ...) need  
 perform background initialization?

RAID 1 and above.

 3. if I run heavy application, will it hurt background  
 initialization and disk rebuild?

Yes, of course, I usually set rebuild rate to 100% because I'd rather  
slow IO during a rebuild then risk a possible double failure during a  
slow rebuild.

-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Alan Sparks
Ross Walker wrote:
 On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za 
   wrote:
   
 Hello all,


 I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to have  
 'backups' of
 my xen domUs.

 Is it necessary to change the xen domains configs to use /dev/drbd*
 instead of the LVM volume that drbd mirrors, and which the xen domU  
 runs
 of?
 

 Yes otherwise the data won't be replicated and your drbd volume will  
 be inconsistent and need resync'd.

 -Ross

 ___
   

To be clear, are you saying you have a DRBD partition on both host
machines, and LVM on top of that to allocate LVs for host storage?

You would not want to bypass the LVM layer in that case.  The hosts
would be still configured to map the LV devices into the domUs.  You
need to go through the LVM layer, which uses the DRBD partition as a
block physical device.  The writes down through the DRDB layer will
still be replicated.
-Alan

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CENTOS 4.8 available time????

2009-08-20 Thread James Pearson
Karanbir Singh wrote:
 On 08/20/2009 01:22 PM, James Pearson wrote:
 
Is it possible to get an update on the status of 4.8?
 
 
 its going out to the mirrors right now, Depending on how long they take 
 to stabalise, we should see release in the next 24 - 48 hrs.

Thanks

James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Coert Waagmeester

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 09:38 -0600, Alan Sparks wrote:
 Ross Walker wrote:
  On Aug 20, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Coert Waagmeester lgro...@waagmeester.co.za 
wrote:

  Hello all,
 
 
  I am running drbd protocol A to a secondary machine to have  
  'backups' of
  my xen domUs.
 
  Is it necessary to change the xen domains configs to use /dev/drbd*
  instead of the LVM volume that drbd mirrors, and which the xen domU  
  runs
  of?
  
 
  Yes otherwise the data won't be replicated and your drbd volume will  
  be inconsistent and need resync'd.
 
  -Ross
 
  ___

 
 To be clear, are you saying you have a DRBD partition on both host
 machines, and LVM on top of that to allocate LVs for host storage?
 
 You would not want to bypass the LVM layer in that case.  The hosts
 would be still configured to map the LV devices into the domUs.  You
 need to go through the LVM layer, which uses the DRBD partition as a
 block physical device.  The writes down through the DRDB layer will
 still be replicated.
 -Alan
 
Hello Alan,

This is my current setup:

Xen DomU

DRBD

LVM Volume

RAID 1


What I first wanted to do was:

DomU | DRBD

LVM Volume

RAID 1

Is this possible or not recommended?

Regards,
Coert

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] drbd xen question

2009-08-20 Thread Alan Sparks
Coert Waagmeester wrote:
 Hello Alan,

 This is my current setup:

 Xen DomU
 
 DRBD
 
 LVM Volume
 
 RAID 1


 What I first wanted to do was:

 DomU | DRBD
 
 LVM Volume
 
 RAID 1

   

If I understand you diagram, you have DRDB running inside your domU with
LVM on top of it now, and you are considering moving DRDB out of the
domU into your dom0.   Yes, it should work, and yes, you'll have to
change the domU config to map the drbd block device into the domU.  Am
hoping a vgscan on the domU will pick up the fact you will be
effectively changing the physical device names.  I think the arrangement
of doing DRDB and LVM at the dom0 level, and mapping LVs out of that as
domU disks is not an uncommon implementation.
-Alan

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] needs help about vps

2009-08-20 Thread Victor Padro
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 9:24 AM, Ian Murraymurra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:




 - Original Message 
 From: ann kok oiyan...@yahoo.ca
 To: centos@centos.org
 Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 15:10:09
 Subject: [CentOS] needs help about vps

 hi all

 anyone have experience about vps

 which one is better?


 Depends what you are trying to do run multiple servers, or just a second 
 environment on your workstation plus, pls define 'better'




 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Maybe you mean Virtual Machines, if that's so both Xen and Virtualbox
are easy to install and manage even Vmware Server is easy to install
and manage too.

But if you mean server VPS, then there are three options: KVM, Xen and
OpenVZ, all are free and you might find useful this site:
http://www.howtoforge.com/ just search these keywords: CentOS
Virtualization


-- 
Linux User #452368
http://twitter.com/vpadro

Manifiesto por una cultura libre:
http://culturalibre.org/

Doing a thing well is often a waste of time.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DNS Server Recommendations

2009-08-20 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Chuck Sent: August 16, 2009 18:17
 
 I recommend a highly secured master that is not queried by any
 clients (preferably in a network/vlan your clients can't even
 access)... then configure one-way zone transfers to 2 or more slave
 servers which you configure your clients to point to. Maintain your
 zone files in rcs of some sort...

While I can agree with you suggestion in principal I think that this
might be overkill in our situation. We have a relatively small network
(6-8 servers, 15-20 workstations and maybe a dozen other types of
equipment). I  our case I think we can get away with a master and a
slave DNS server running on existing servers.

 For IP control/delegation and DNS control/delegation I recommend IP
 Plan.

I had stumbled across this before but I will have a better look at it.

 Of course bind is the 800lb gorilla in the DNS world... don't even
 think about putting DNS on windows.

We are primarily a UNIX/Linux shop and I prefer not to use windows
for such services unless I absolutely must. There are services that
we require that only run on windows so we do have windows servers in
our mix.

 I don't recommend any front ends being that a few hours well spent
 reading the docs and man pages will make you a dns expert in no
 time. Bind is very easy to learn and shouldn't take longer than an
 afternoon at best.

I think I am going to have to disagree with you here. I have been
using BIND for several years. While I have spent many hours reading
docs and man pages I definitely would not classify myself as a DNS
expert. I know that I am of above average intelligence and maybe I
just have a blind spot when it comes to BIND (and it has been known
to happen) but I just do not find it as straight forward to learn
as you have. Then again I am getting on in years so that may be
a contributing factor as well.

Anyway, thank you very much for your comments and suggestions. They 
are appreciated.

Regards, Hugh

-- 
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):

 Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me.

What is daunting about virt-install -p?

 I don't know if that is possible under virt-install.

Everything is possible, it depends on how deep you want to dig into it. This guy
just wants to get his first Xen VM up for some testing (I suppose). There is no
need to follow lengthy explanations and fail in the end if there is a simple 
command available.

 I think tap:aio is more favoured than file, for performance reasons.

This is general belief. I suggest doing some tests. After that you may think 
different. ;-) Also, there have been various problems with tap:aio devices in 
the
various Xen incarnations over time that weren't present in file.
You want to use LVM or remote storage for real world usage, anyway, but that 
wasn't the task outlined by the OP.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DNS Server Recommendations

2009-08-20 Thread Hugh E Cruickshank
From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: August 14, 2009 14:18
 
 I am looking for some possible recommendations on the handling of our
 internal DNS services. First some background...

I would like to express my appreciation to all those that responded to
my request (particularly Robert). I do not have solution yet but I do
have a lot of information to review and digest.

Thanks again to all.

Regards, Hugh

-- 
Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

2009-08-20 Thread James Pearson
Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or 
later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta?

It's mentioned as having a fix for Bugzilla #448586 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448586

I what to see if it fixes a X11 crash we're having.

Thanks

James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

2009-08-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, James
Pearsonjame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
 Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or
 later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta?

 It's mentioned as having a fix for Bugzilla #448586
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448586

Looks like the patch is in there:

* Wed Apr 22 2009 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 1.1.1-48.53

- xserver-1.1.1-saturate-trap-walks.patch: Saturate span walks in Render,
  so we don't wrap around. (#448586)

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks

2009-08-20 Thread Eugene Vilensky
Hello,

What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
attacks?  I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
helpdesk call.

What are some policies/techniques that have worked for this list with
minimal hassle?

Thanks!

-Eugene
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

2009-08-20 Thread James Pearson
Akemi Yagi wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, James
 Pearsonjame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
 Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or
 later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta?

 It's mentioned as having a fix for Bugzilla #448586
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448586
 
 Looks like the patch is in there:
 
 * Wed Apr 22 2009 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 1.1.1-48.53
 
 - xserver-1.1.1-saturate-trap-walks.patch: Saturate span walks in Render,
   so we don't wrap around. (#448586)

Is that SRPM (or just the patch) available for download from somewhere?

Thanks

James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks

2009-08-20 Thread Ron Loftin

On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 15:14 -0500, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
 Hello,
 
 What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
 attacks?  I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
 like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
 are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
 helpdesk call.

Along with DenyHosts, consider the SSH server options AllowGroups and
AllowUsers to specify the users/groups allowed to connect.  My
experience is that this will deal with the majority of brute-force
attacks, since many of these target known user accounts ( root,
daemon, etc. ) as well as common names ( joe, jane, etc. ).

If an attempt is made to log in with a user name not specified by the
AllowGroups or AllowUsers options, the ssh server will reject it as
an invalid user and throw the connection on the floor, which seems to
lighten the load for DenyHosts.  Refer to man sshd_config for more
info.

For myself, with a pretty small user population, I just create a group
called sshusers ( of course, the name can be whatever you choose ) and
put users in that group who need SSH access from outside.

As always, YMMV. ;

 
 What are some policies/techniques that have worked for this list with
 minimal hassle?
 
 Thanks!
 
 -Eugene
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
-- 
Ron Loftin  relof...@twcny.rr.com

God, root, what is difference ?   Piter from UserFriendly

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Alternative to logwatch

2009-08-20 Thread Developer
Hello,
I am searching an alternative to logwatch.
After too much time spent trying to configure it.
I have apache log's in different files and directories, for some reason
I can not put logwatch to work.

Anyone know and alternative?

-- 














--
--
Publicidad y Servicios http://www.pas-world.com
Directorio http://www.precioventa.com
Tienda http://informatica.precioventa.com/es/
Autoridad certificadora http://ca.precioventa.com/es/
--
--

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Alternative to logwatch

2009-08-20 Thread Max Hetrick
Developer wrote:
 Hello,
 I am searching an alternative to logwatch.
 After too much time spent trying to configure it.
 I have apache log's in different files and directories, for some reason
 I can not put logwatch to work.
 
 Anyone know and alternative?
 

Check out swatch from the RPMForge repo.

swatch.noarch : Tool for actively monitoring log files.

Regards,
Max

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] logwatch not mailing

2009-08-20 Thread Ray Leventhal
Hi,

# uname -a Linux obfuscated.example.com 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue 
Aug 4 20:23:34 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

I noticed a few days ago that I'm not getting my logwatch emails to the 
root account any longer, and while I've definitely been applying updates 
from base, no other changes have happened on this box.

I ran logwatch at the command line:

logwatch --detail medium --mailto r...@fqdn.example.com

but still no email.

As expected, /etc/cron.daily has the following entry:
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   39 Jul 30  2008 0logwatch - 
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl

Where should I start looking to figure out why logwatch seems not to be 
doing its thing?

Thanks in advance,
-Ray

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] logwatch not mailing

2009-08-20 Thread Cliff Nadler
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Ray Leventhal cen...@swhi.net wrote:
 I noticed a few days ago that I'm not getting my logwatch emails to the
 root account any longer, and while I've definitely been applying updates
 from base, no other changes have happened on this box.

I'd check the /var/spool/cron log to see if it's actually running
properly. After that I'd check the maillogs to see if there was a
delivery problem.


 I ran logwatch at the command line:

 logwatch --detail medium --mailto r...@fqdn.example.com

Try that again, but tail -f /var/log/maillog in another window (if
there's not alot of mail traffic on that host) to see if it's
generating any mail logs


 but still no email.

 As expected, /etc/cron.daily has the following entry:
 lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root   39 Jul 30  2008 0logwatch -
 /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl


What are the permissions on /usr/share/logwatch/scripts/logwatch.pl?
Check to see if any updates were applied to logwatch recently (yum
info or rpm -qi logwatch) and check your logwatch config files to see
if anything changed there.

Hope this helps,
Cliff
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] logwatch not mailing

2009-08-20 Thread Garry.Dale
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Ray Leventhalcen...@swhi.net wrote:

 I noticed a few days ago that I'm not getting my logwatch emails to the
 root account any longer, and while I've definitely been applying updates
 from base, no other changes have happened on this box.

 Where should I start looking to figure out why logwatch seems not to be
 doing its thing?

Are any emails going out?  Perhaps sendmail died? If it were me, I
would start by checking the mail queue (# mailq), the mail log
(/var/adm/maillog), and the sendmail mail transport agent (# service
sendmail status). I use a default setup which requires sendmail to be
running for delivery of mail to r...@locahost.

gd
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks

2009-08-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Eugene Vilensky wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:58 -0500:

 What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
 attacks?  I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
 like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
 are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
 helpdesk call.

Google for SSH rate-limiting.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks

2009-08-20 Thread Hodja Nasredin
Hi,

fail2ban is good choice,  not only for ssh.

bye
On 20.8.2009, at 23:31, Kai Schaetzl wrote:

 Eugene Vilensky wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:14:58 -0500:

 What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
 attacks?  I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
 like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
 are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
 helpdesk call.

 Google for SSH rate-limiting.

 Kai

 -- 
 Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
 Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hodja Nasredin
nasre...@sutra.cz



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] DNS Server Recommendations

2009-08-20 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
You could get really simple if your a small shop and just use dnsmasq.
Although, I'm not sure it meets all of your needs.

Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Hugh E Cruickshank h...@forsoft.comwrote:

 From: Hugh E Cruickshank Sent: August 14, 2009 14:18
 
  I am looking for some possible recommendations on the handling of our
  internal DNS services. First some background...

 I would like to express my appreciation to all those that responded to
 my request (particularly Robert). I do not have solution yet but I do
 have a lot of information to review and digest.

 Thanks again to all.

 Regards, Hugh

 --
 Hugh E Cruickshank, Forward Software, www.forward-software.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Access to xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or later) SRPM ?

2009-08-20 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:22 PM, James
Pearsonjame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
 Akemi Yagi wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM, James
 Pearsonjame...@moving-picture.com wrote:
 Does anyone have access to the xorg-x11-server-1.1.1-48.53.el5 (or
 later) SRPM - which may be part of 5.4 beta?

 Looks like the patch is in there:

 * Wed Apr 22 2009 Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com 1.1.1-48.53

 - xserver-1.1.1-saturate-trap-walks.patch: Saturate span walks in Render,
   so we don't wrap around. (#448586)

 Is that SRPM (or just the patch) available for download from somewhere?

Not that I know of.  However, I heard that the release of 5.4 is
around the corner, so the wait may not be long.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] How to tell if I've been hacked?

2009-08-20 Thread Magnus Holmström
Check for failed logins in /var/log/messages

Check if the /etc/passwd file have been changed

Use commands like last, w and uptime.



2009/8/19 Eduardo Grosclaude eduardo.groscla...@gmail.com

 On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Bill Campbellcen...@celestial.com
 wrote:
  You cannot trust tools like ``ps'', ``find'', ``netstat'', and
  ``lsof'' as these are frequently replaced by ones that are
  modified to hide the cracker's work.

 As a corollary, the only safe way to audit a suspected system is
 booting your diagnostic tool from known good media (eg try a security
 Live CD distro)

 --
 Eduardo Grosclaude
 Universidad Nacional del Comahue
 Neuquen, Argentina
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install 32 or 64 bits

2009-08-20 Thread Magnus Holmström
I would go for the 64bits version. (even though you only run 1GB Memory)

2009/8/18 Yaovi Atohoun yaov...@yahoo.fr

 Hi all,

 I am going to install CENTOS 5..3  on three HP Proliant ML 350G servers.
 The processor is Quad-core Xeon E5420 and E5335 for one of them. They all
 have 1GB Memory. Should I install a 32 bits version or 64 bits versions?

 The servers will be used  an organization about 50 peoples for Web, Mail
 and related services.

 Thanks

 --- En date de : *Mar 18.8.09, Alan Sparks aspa...@doublesparks.net* a
 écrit :


 De: Alan Sparks aspa...@doublesparks.net
 Objet: Re: [CentOS] httpd .htaccess rewrite for images
 À: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Date: Mardi 18 Août 2009, 6h18

 Dave wrote:
  In my httpd virtual host directive i have:
 
  alias /images /var/www/test.example.com/images
  Directory /var/www/test.example.com/images
  Options None
  AllowOverride None
  order allow,deny
  Allow from all
  /Directory
 
  Comments appreciated.
 

 Assume you mean that the rewrites are ignored.  Note that AllowOverride
 None tells apache to completely ignore .htaccess files.
 Either move your rewrite rules into the vhost container or consider
 AllowOverride FileInfo.
 -Alan

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org http://mc/compose?to=cen...@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
I definitely think if your new to Xen and are use to doing normal CD
installs, then virt-install is the easiest way to go.

Also, you could consider using prebuilt images that are already made
depending on your needs.  These can be found on stacklet.com.

Hope that helps,
Matt

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.comwrote:

 Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):

  Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me.

 What is daunting about virt-install -p?

  I don't know if that is possible under virt-install.

 Everything is possible, it depends on how deep you want to dig into it.
 This guy
 just wants to get his first Xen VM up for some testing (I suppose). There
 is no
 need to follow lengthy explanations and fail in the end if there is a
 simple
 command available.

  I think tap:aio is more favoured than file, for performance reasons.

 This is general belief. I suggest doing some tests. After that you may
 think
 different. ;-) Also, there have been various problems with tap:aio devices
 in the
 various Xen incarnations over time that weren't present in file.
 You want to use LVM or remote storage for real world usage, anyway, but
 that
 wasn't the task outlined by the OP.

 Kai

 --
 Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
 Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce ssh attacks

2009-08-20 Thread Oliver Ransom

On 21/08/2009, at 5:44 AM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:

 Hello,

 What is the best way to protect multiuser systems from brute force
 attacks?  I am setting up a relatively loose DenyHosts policy, but I
 like the idea of locking an account for a time if too many attempts
 are made, but to balance this with keeping the user from making a
 helpdesk call.

 What are some policies/techniques that have worked for this list with
 minimal hassle?

As an additional question to the above, would forcing users to log in  
with SSH keys rather than passwords avoid requiring any anti brute  
force attack measures to be put in place?

Thanks,
Oliver


 Thanks!

 -Eugene
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] protecting multiuser systems from bruteforce sshattacks

2009-08-20 Thread Neil Aggarwal
 As an additional question to the above, would forcing users 
 to log in  
 with SSH keys rather than passwords avoid requiring any anti brute  
 force attack measures to be put in place?

You are right, but that is not feasible for most 
shared systems.

Its hard enough to get customers to use SSH,
SFTP, and SCP instead of telnet and FTP.  

Getting them to use keys would be impossible.

Another problem to consider is what other ports
are open on the machine.  Are any of them prone
to brute force attacks?  I don't think you can use
keys for them.

Neil

--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, www.JAMMConsulting.com
Will your e-commerce site go offline if you have
a DB server failure, fiber cut, flood, fire, or other disaster?
If so, ask about our geographically redundant database system. 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Ian Murray




- Original Message 
 From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
 To: centos@centos.org
 Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 19:31:21
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest
 
 Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):
 
  Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me.
 
 What is daunting about virt-install -p?

[r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p
ERRORA name is required for the virtual machine.
[r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p -n newdom
ERRORMemory amount is required for the virtual machine.
[r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p -n newdom -r 256
ERRORA disk must be specified (use --nodisks to override)

So it goes on... I suppose once you plough through all the options and save the 
whole command somewhere, then it is trivial to create new ones, but I got the 
impression that it was interactive for any missing options.

Perhaps for the benefit of the OP, perhaps you could give a complete known 
working example.

 
  I don't know if that is possible under virt-install.
 
 Everything is possible, it depends on how deep you want to dig into it. This 
 guy
 just wants to get his first Xen VM up for some testing (I suppose). There is 
 no
 need to follow lengthy explanations and fail in the end if there is a simple 
 command available.
 
  I think tap:aio is more favoured than file, for performance reasons.
 
 This is general belief. I suggest doing some tests. After that you may think 
 different. ;-) Also, there have been various problems with tap:aio devices in 
 the
 various Xen incarnations over time that weren't present in file.

Well, if you have done such tests, please do share... especially on the 
xen-users list, as there are far more competent Xen-ers to discuss your 
findings than me.

 You want to use LVM or remote storage for real world usage, anyway, but that 
 wasn't the task outlined by the OP.

File based domains initially seemed the simplest way for me, but after a while 
I concluded they were a but of a pain actually, so indeed I do stick with LVs.



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] p800 and HP

2009-08-20 Thread Mag Gam
I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with P400
and P800 controller.  How reliable are they for a 24x7 shop?

TIA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Arg... jdk problem on centos 5

2009-08-20 Thread Chuck
I have downloaded the EE JDK 5.07 for Linux from Sun.

If I try and run java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin as a normal user it works fine
and I get the gui installer to appear.

However if I run it as root, I get this output and then if hangs
indefinitely ultimately requiring a kill -9 to stop:

[r...@canthus Downloads]# ./java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin
Checking available disk space...
Checking Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment...
Extracting Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment files...
*** glibc detected *** ./java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin: double free or
corruption (!prev): 0x092d52a8 ***
=== Backtrace: =
/lib/libc.so.6[0x5850f1]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x90)[0x588bc0]
./java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin(GetPublicJREPath+0x6df)[0x8054269]
./java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin(main+0x8f8)[0x804e37c]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc)[0x531e8c]
./java_ee_sdk-5_07-linux.bin(dlopen+0x41)[0x804c9f5]
=== Memory map: 
SNIP
ffce7000-ffcfc000 rw-p 7ffea000 00:00 0
[stack]
e000-f000 r-xp e000 00:00 0
Deleting temporary files...


Any ideas???
Thx
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] p800 and HP

2009-08-20 Thread John R Pierce
Mag Gam wrote:
 I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with P400
 and P800 controller.  How reliable are they for a 24x7 shop?
   

well, its not 5-nines stuff, there's all kinda single points of 
failure.  you want 0.9 kinda reliability, you need a fully redundant 
system with multipath, at every stage, like a fiberchannel SAN with dual 
HBA's on each system, dual switches, dual controllers on each storage 
array, etc, all components hotswappable, etc.  of course, this all comes 
at siginficant expense, both in complexity and cost.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Dual Booting Question

2009-08-20 Thread Michael Wright
Hi List 

I'm new to centos i'm also on the forum but my question is how do i do a dual 
boot say windows/centos 

i no i have to partition the harddrive can i do this in centos..\

could someone help us out  

Mike___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problem with udev when booting kernel 5.3 release 128.4.1

2009-08-20 Thread Rob Kampen

Rob Kampen wrote:

Hi List,
I am running a 64 bit 5.3 kernel on an intel mb and all has been well.
Today I thought it would be okay to reboot so that the latest kernel 
was running - i.e move from 128.2.1 to 128.4.1 release.
The system passes POST fine, grub passes control to the 128.4.1 kernel 
and the boot process is under way.

after some 30 secs the system starts beeping - continuously.
After I hooked up a monitor I find that udev does not come up with OK 
and thats when the system starts the beep beep beep ..

No logs to see ..
using grub to select 128.2.1 boot fine
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance for your words of wisdom and advice.
Rob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  
Still no joy with the latest kernel - fails at initialization of udevd 
with beep beep beep ...
I have tried a new version of the rr174x raid controller device driver, 
new make and make install but still the same issue. Not sure if this 
module is looked at by udev or not - I'm way out of my depth here.


Currently server is functioning fine on
Linux obfuscated.example.com 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jul 14 
06:36:37 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
but I'm perturbed why a simple update of the kernel kills my server - 
not what I expected from CentOS / RHEL.
What tests / things should I check? I see no files in /etc with dates 
after Jul 21 (date I installed 128.2.1 kernel) that appear to contain 
any device related changes

Any help appreciated.
Rob
begin:vcard
fn:Rob Kampen
n:Kampen;Rob
email;internet:rkam...@kampensonline.com
tel;work:407-896-9556 x6344
tel;fax:407-896-7607
tel;home:407-876-4854
tel;cell:407-341-3815
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] p800 and HP

2009-08-20 Thread Mag Gam
Well, I am poor and so is my school.

We want to setup a cheap storage farm so I was asking what is people's
opinions on the the controller and the disks :-)


On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:33 PM, John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
 Mag Gam wrote:
 I was wondering if anyone here has experience with HP MSA60 with P400
 and P800 controller.  How reliable are they for a 24x7 shop?


 well, its not 5-nines stuff, there's all kinda single points of
 failure.  you want 0.9 kinda reliability, you need a fully redundant
 system with multipath, at every stage, like a fiberchannel SAN with dual
 HBA's on each system, dual switches, dual controllers on each storage
 array, etc, all components hotswappable, etc.  of course, this all comes
 at siginficant expense, both in complexity and cost.


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of guest

2009-08-20 Thread Mathew S. McCarrell
virt-install can be interactive if you supply a few necessary options
first.  I've put a sample of what I normally do below.

[r...@dom0 ~]$ /usr/sbin/virt-install -p --nonsparse -b xenbr0

What is the name of your virtual machine? VM NAME HERE
How much RAM should be allocated (in megabytes)? 256
What would you like to use as the disk (path)? /xen/images/VM NAME HERE.disk

How large would you like the disk (/xen/images/VM NAME HERE) to be
(in gigabytes)? 5

Would you like to enable graphics support? (yes or no) no
What is the install location? http://mirror.clarkson.edu/centos/5.3/os/x86_64/

Also, if your willing to spend a few bucks, the Running Xen book is a great
source of information for anything relating to Xen (and I'm not saying that
just because I'm friends with several of the authors).  Also, you might find
the following slides useful.  http://cosi.clarkson.edu/docs/installingxen/

--
Mathew S. McCarrell
Clarkson University '10

mccar...@gmail.com
mccar...@clarkson.edu
1-518-314-9214



On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Ian Murray murra...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:





 - Original Message 
  From: Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
  To: centos@centos.org
  Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2009 19:31:21
  Subject: Re: [CentOS] virt-manager crashes Host during installation of
 guest
 
  Ian Murray wrote on Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:21:33 + (GMT):
 
   Actual, virt-install commmand line looks no less daunting to me.
 
  What is daunting about virt-install -p?

 [r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p
 ERRORA name is required for the virtual machine.
 [r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p -n newdom
 ERRORMemory amount is required for the virtual machine.
 [r...@xen ~]# virt-install -p -n newdom -r 256
 ERRORA disk must be specified (use --nodisks to override)

 So it goes on... I suppose once you plough through all the options and save
 the whole command somewhere, then it is trivial to create new ones, but I
 got the impression that it was interactive for any missing options.

 Perhaps for the benefit of the OP, perhaps you could give a complete known
 working example.

 
   I don't know if that is possible under virt-install.
 
  Everything is possible, it depends on how deep you want to dig into it.
 This guy
  just wants to get his first Xen VM up for some testing (I suppose). There
 is no
  need to follow lengthy explanations and fail in the end if there is a
 simple
  command available.
 
   I think tap:aio is more favoured than file, for performance reasons.
 
  This is general belief. I suggest doing some tests. After that you may
 think
  different. ;-) Also, there have been various problems with tap:aio
 devices in
  the
  various Xen incarnations over time that weren't present in file.

 Well, if you have done such tests, please do share... especially on the
 xen-users list, as there are far more competent Xen-ers to discuss your
 findings than me.

  You want to use LVM or remote storage for real world usage, anyway, but
 that
  wasn't the task outlined by the OP.

 File based domains initially seemed the simplest way for me, but after a
 while I concluded they were a but of a pain actually, so indeed I do stick
 with LVs.




 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] problem with udev when booting kernel 5.3 release 128.4.1

2009-08-20 Thread Tru Huynh
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:41:55PM -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
 Rob Kampen wrote:
 Hi List,
 I am running a 64 bit 5.3 kernel on an intel mb and all has been well.
 Today I thought it would be okay to reboot so that the latest kernel  
 was running - i.e move from 128.2.1 to 128.4.1 release.
 The system passes POST fine, grub passes control to the 128.4.1 kernel  
 and the boot process is under way.
 after some 30 secs the system starts beeping - continuously.
 After I hooked up a monitor I find that udev does not come up with OK  
 and thats when the system starts the beep beep beep ..
...
 Still no joy with the latest kernel - fails at initialization of udevd  
 with beep beep beep ...
 I have tried a new version of the rr174x raid controller device driver,  
 new make and make install but still the same issue. Not sure if this  
 module is looked at by udev or not - I'm way out of my depth here.

 Currently server is functioning fine on
 Linux obfuscated.example.com 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Jul 14  
 06:36:37 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 but I'm perturbed why a simple update of the kernel kills my server -  
 not what I expected from CentOS / RHEL.
 What tests / things should I check? I see no files in /etc with dates  
 after Jul 21 (date I installed 128.2.1 kernel) that appear to contain  
 any device related changes

The changelog from 2.6.18-128.2.1.el5 to 2.6.18-128.4.1.el5:

* Fri Jul 24 2009 Don Howard dhow...@redhat.com [2.6.18-128.4.1.el5]
- [fs] ecryptfs: check tag 11 packet literal data buffer size (Eric Sandeen ) 
[512862 512863] {CVE-2009-2406}
- [fs] ecryptfs: check tag 3 packet encrypted key size (Eric Sandeen ) [512886 
512887] {CVE-2009-2407}
- [misc] personality handling: fix PER_CLEAR_ON_SETID (Vitaly Mayatskikh ) 
[511173 508842] {CVE-2009-1895}
- [xen] HV: remove high latency spin_lock (Chris Lalancette ) [512311 459410]

* Tue Jul 14 2009 Jiri Pirko jpi...@redhat.com [2.6.18-128.3.1.el5]
- [pci] quirk: disable MSI on VIA VT3364 chipsets (Dean Nelson ) [507529 501374]
- [char] tty: prevent an O_NDELAY writer from blocking (Mauro Carvalho Chehab ) 
[510239 506806]
- [misc] hrtimer: fix a soft lockup (Amerigo Wang ) [418061 418071] 
{CVE-2007-5966}
- [misc] hrtimer: check relative timeouts for overflow (AMEET M. PARANJAPE ) 
[510018 492230]

Do you see anything relevant to your hardware?

Since you mention that udev has started, we can rule out the 
kernelbooting/initrd stage.

Tru

-- 
Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance)
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B


pgpRNdsAuCe8Z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Dual Booting Question

2009-08-20 Thread Hanmo
When install the system,  please format the disk  and leave the free space to 
the linux.
Intall the xp firstly,  then install the centos on the free space.
Use the grub to load these two system.


2009-08-21 



Hanmo 



发件人: Michael Wright 
发送时间: 2009-08-21  10:39:33 
收件人: centos@centos.org 
抄送: 
主题: [CentOS] Dual Booting Question 
 
Hi List 

I'm new to centos i'm also on the forum but my question is how do i do a dual 
boot say windows/centos 

i no i have to partition the harddrive can i do this in centos..\

could someone help us out  

Mike
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.1 kickstart CD and intel 82576 driver

2009-08-20 Thread aurfalien
Well, first of all, thanks so much for the overwhelming response to my  
post.


I got it working and here is what I did;

1 - Get the source from Intel and compile in the same env as the  
kickstart OS. You will have an igb.ko file as a result.


2 - Mount the kickstart CD;
a - cd to were you want it.
b - gunzip  /media/CDROM/initrd.img | cpio -i --make-directories

3 - change to to the modules directory that was created in #2b above.
a - gunzip  modules.cgz | (cd were you want it  cpio -idv)
b - cp igb.ko were ever you wanted it from #a above/kernal-version/86x64

4 - change to the parent dir the of kernal-version and do;
a - find kernal-version | cpio -ov -H crc | gzip  path to were u want  
it/modules.cgz


5 - modify the files in your modules dir from #2b above, Since 5.3 has  
support for this Itel NIC, I had to reverse engineer from 5.3  
initrd.img the files;

pci.ids
modules.alias

6 - go into the parent dir from #2b were the contents of initrd.img  
were extracted and were you modifying the files in #3b and #4b;

a - (find . | cpio --quiet -c -o)  ../initrd.img

7 - copy the iniitrd to your original isolinux dir that the kickstart  
Cd is based off of.


8 - change to that dir and do;
a - mkisofs -o ../whatevername.iso -b isolinux.bin -c boot.cat -no- 
emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table .


9 - use what ever burning sw to create a CD from iso.


Hope this helps any one in a similar bind.

On Aug 19, 2009, at 4:56 PM, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:


Hi all,

I've got a Centos 5.1 kickstart that I must continue to use.

How can I update the kick start image so that it recognizes Intel  
gigabit 82576 nic?


BTW, I compiled the driver I need and have this igb.ko file.

How do I incorporate that into my initrd.img file that I see on the  
kickstart CD that is probably my kickstart boot OS.


Thank you very much in advance.

aurf -


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Running UML on CentOS?

2009-08-20 Thread Dave
Hello,
I've got a CentOS 5.3 machine that i'd like to virtualize some
services on. Currently a reinstall for virtualization isn't doable so i
thought about user-mode-linux, UML. Has anyone run this on Centos5? If so,
feedback prose and cons appreciated.
Thanks.
Dave.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] p800 and HP

2009-08-20 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Well, I am poor and so is my school.

We want to setup a cheap storage farm so I was asking what is people's
opinions on the the controller and the disks :-)

It's rock solid, I am sure you wont have issues...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos