Re: [CentOS-es] RESTRINGIR EMAILS

2009-12-30 Thread victor santana
Hola, cuando hablas de restringir ciertos emails te refieres a:
1º ¿restringir la entrada de correo procedente de esos mails?
2º ¿restringir la salida de correo de esos emails?

El 29 de diciembre de 2009 23:34, jorge marcelo martinez 
marcelomartinez...@hotmail.com escribió:

  BUENAS!! QUIERO SABER COMO HACER PARA RESTRINGIR CIERTOS EMAILS!!! EN
 MI SERVIDOR ANTES DE QUE CIRCULE POR LA RED!!!

 --
 ¿Te llegan demasiados emails? Organizate con Hotmail. ¡Creá carpetas para
 todos tus correos! http://mail.live.com/

 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es




-- 

___
 REPARACIONONLINE
GARANTIA PARA SU PC

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] servidor de correo intermedio

2009-12-30 Thread Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez
 El problema viene cuando alguien me manda un correo desde digamos 
 yahoo.com a midominio.com. Este llega por logica a midominio.com (el 
 servidor que todo el mundo tiene en su dns), y ¿como hago para que el 
 correo sea enviado a mi servidor de la lan???
 
no te explicas bien por lo que asumiré dos cosas que son las típicas
confusiones:
1- tu servidor está con una ip privada (192.168.1.10 por ejemplo), y tu
ip publica de tu red local es 4.3.2.1
2- tu sitio web está alojado en otro lugar (ip 1.2.3.4)

solución, simple:
1- crea un record A llamado mail.midominio.com apuntando a 4.3.2.1
2- crea un record MX de midominio.com. con peso 10 apuntando a
mail.midominio.com.
3- por supuesto no quieres recibir en 4.3.2.1 sino en una IP interna,
simplemente crea un DNAT que el puerto 25 de 4.3.2.1 vaya al 25 de
192.168.1.10

saludos
epe

 Para enviar correos, no creo que vaya a haber mayor problema, encontré 
 esto http://wiki.dreamhost.com/Postfix (de hecho el servidor de correo 
 está con dreamhost).
 
 
 ___
 CentOS-es mailing list
 CentOS-es@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS-es] wpa tkip centos y certificado digital

2009-12-30 Thread Oscar Osta Pueyo
Hola,

2009/12/31 ces can arvega...@hotmail.com

  Saludos:
 tengo una red inalambrica que tiene un portal captivo y la quiero cambiar a
 una red inalambrica segura con wpa y tkip ya tengo el radius que es un
 freeradius tengo el dhcp server , pero me he quedado en la parte de los
 certificados digitales, he creado los certificados con openssl pero la pc
 cliente que tiene xp no se conecta  , segun me han dicho es por el tema de
 los certificados digitales que tiene que estar validados por empresas
 certificadoras y eso cuesta dinero, en una laptop con xp pude conectarlo
 pero sin validar en un servidor y en el caso de las windows mobile no se
 conecta hga lo que haga , me pueden explicar como es esto de los
 certificados digitales se compra? se instala ?son archivos?



Eso que te han comento en una verdad a medias. Es cierto que existe
Entidades Certificadoras (CA) a nivel mundial que son capaces de firma un
certificado para que dentro de la lista de comprabaciones tu navegador
compruebe que ese certificado está firmado por una CA válida y confie en el.
Pero no creo que sea tu caso.

Creo que tu problema está en que tu navegador no confia en el certificado ya
que no está firmado por ninguna de las CA's que tiene en su almacen y este
tampoco instalado en ese almacen. Existe la posibilidad de forzar esa
confianza, si consigues descargar el certificado a tu xp y haces doble click
sobre el, conseguiras instalarlo en el almacen de explorer o firefox y de
forma automática se confiará en el, sin necesidad de CA.

Otra vuelta de tuerca sería con un sistema GNU/Linux y openssl generar una
CA y firmar ese certficado con la CA creada, luego instalas la CA en el
navegador y debería funcionar. Pero esto es más complicado y para temas
caseros creo que innecesario, a no ser que quieras aprender de estos temas.


-- 
Oscar Osta Pueyo
oostap.lis...@gmail.com
_kiakli_

http://fedoraproject.org/ca/
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es


Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

2009-12-30 Thread Neil Aggarwal
Frank:

 chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

Do you have selinux disabled or enabled?

Neil 


--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net
CentOS 5.4 VPS with unmetered bandwidth only $25/month!
No overage charges, 7 day free trial, PayPal, Google Checkout

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

2009-12-30 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
Disabled.

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer   MCP, MCP+I, MCSE  RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co.   Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax:   (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas  76710


 


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:16 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

Frank:

 chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

Do you have selinux disabled or enabled?

Neil 


--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net
CentOS 5.4 VPS with unmetered bandwidth only $25/month!
No overage charges, 7 day free trial, PayPal, Google Checkout

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any 
review, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
privacy...@ailife.com.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

2009-12-30 Thread Frank M. Ramaekers
Oh, I should mention: 
# uname -a
Linux vmlnx000..com 2.6.9-78.0.8.EL #1 SMP Tue Nov 25 19:59:09
EET 2008 s390x s390x s390x GNU/Linux

CentOS 4.7

Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer   MCP, MCP+I, MCSE  RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co.   Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax:   (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas  76710


 


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Neil Aggarwal
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2009 10:16 AM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

Frank:

 chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

Do you have selinux disabled or enabled?

Neil 


--
Neil Aggarwal, (281)846-8957, http://UnmeteredVPS.net
CentOS 5.4 VPS with unmetered bandwidth only $25/month!
No overage charges, 7 day free trial, PayPal, Google Checkout

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

_
This message contains information which is privileged and confidential and is 
solely for the use of the
intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any 
review, disclosure,
copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message is strictly 
prohibited. If you have
received this in error, please destroy it immediately and notify us at 
privacy...@ailife.com.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Find reason for heavy load

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Harold
On 12/29/2009 11:44 PM, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
 My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
 recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
 Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had a
 monitoring script that sends an email warning me if the current load
 stayed above 0.6 for more than 2 minutes. This script used to trigger
 perhaps once an hour during peak periods. Even so, I seldom see numbers
 higher than 1.x


You should also try out atop instead of just using top.  The major 
advantage is that it gives you more information about the disk and 
network utilization.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Community in each Country

2009-12-30 Thread Fitrah Elly Firdaus
Dear All,

whether there are members here who are active in the community board
CentOS in your respective countries?

I want to make Centos community in my country,Indonesia.

I expect support from all friends


Regards

Firdaus



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

2009-12-30 Thread nate
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:

 It's there, I'm not sure what the problem is:
 # ls -l /bin/bash
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 859120 Oct 24  2008 /bin/bash
 # ls -l /chroot/mysql/bin/bash
 -rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 859120 Oct 24  2008 /chroot/mysql/bin/bash

Make sure all of the libraries that bash needs are in the
chroot? ldd path to binary

nate


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] autofs problems

2009-12-30 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:04 PM, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote:
 We have about 800 CentOS 5.2 servers and our university. We use NFS
 being served from over 10 NetApp frames. We use autofs for to mount up
 our partitions. There have been times where we can't cd into the
 directory. It says the directory does not exist. On some servers it
 works but on others it does not. Typically we restart amd and autofs
 to resolve this issue. But sometimes it does not even work. A reboot
 fixes the problem. I am wondering if anyone knows any tricks to check
 if autofs is working properly on the system and also what I should do
 in a situation like this.

I use a frontend to autofs called autohome. One thing to check is the
nesting level of directories in the autohome configuration. If your
nesting is too flat you can end up with hundreds of separate mounts in
a single directory which can lead to some performance issues (not sure
why).  I don't see this unless I start hitting about 100 mounts inside
a directory though.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] chroot problem.

2009-12-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Frank M. Ramaekers wrote on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:51:10 -0600:

 chroot: cannot run command `/bin/bash': No such file or directory

man chroot: 
If no command is given, run ‘‘${SHELL} -i’’ (default: /bin/sh).

Likely bash relies on some library that is not available. (this is an 
error thrown by bash, not by chroot!)
I don't see why you think running chroot is a good idea when the website 
says to do something else.

Apart from that I very much doubt that using an article from 2003 based on 
FreedBSD 4.x is really what you want to follow. There is some good config 
stuff in there, but chrooting regularly updated daemons doesn't appear to 
be a good idea to me. You have to recompile them again and again for each 
security bug found. If you don't do this immediately you may actually be 
in more danger than without it. If you want to go that route, why then use 
an rpm-based system at all? Rather use OpenBSD.
There may be good reasons why you do like you do, but in general I would 
rather use what's coming with the system, like SELinux, an IDS system and 
other monitoring, tight firewall rules and tight access control.

Kai

-- 
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] autofs problems

2009-12-30 Thread Dave
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Mag Gam magaw...@gmail.com wrote:
 There have been times where we can't cd into the
 directory. It says the directory does not exist. On some servers it
 works but on others it does not. Typically we restart amd and autofs
 to resolve this issue. But sometimes it does not even work. A reboot
 fixes the problem.

Sometimes I see 'stale NFS handle. In that case, restarting autofs
doesn't help. I use  fuser or lsof to figure out what processes are
accessing the dead thing, then kill those processes. Restarting autofs
after killing all such processes seems more likely to work. I'm not
sure the issue is completely resolved in my case, and YMMV.
Dave
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Find reason for heavy load

2009-12-30 Thread Ugo Bellavance
On 2009-12-29 23:44, Noob Centos Admin wrote:
 My Centos 5 server has seen the average load jumped through the roof
 recently despite having no major additional clients placed on it.
 Previously, I was looking at an average of less than 0.6 load, I had a
 monitoring script that sends an email warning me if the current load
 stayed above 0.6 for more than 2 minutes. This script used to trigger
 perhaps once an hour during peak periods. Even so, I seldom see numbers
 higher than 1.x

 On 4th Dec, somebody from an Indian IP range started hammering my SMTP
 service, attempting to use it as an open relay. Naturally that didn't
 work and only end up budging my typical 400KB daily log report into
 2MB~4MB affairs.

 After observing a few days to determine the IP range, I started blocking
 the Indian subnet with apf. Initially I had problems with getting apf to
 wok properly but after a couple of days managed to get the block working
 and my daily log went back down to expected size when all those
 connection attempts disappear from exim's log.

 Now this is when my server load started to shoot through the roof with
 figures like 8.64 5.90 3.62 being reported by my monitoring script,
 triggering so often. I had to raise my threshold to 1.6 to keep my own
 script from spamming myself.

 I've tried changing several things on the server, since initially it
 seems like the high load may be due to I/O wait. So I turning off
 non-essential services like OpenNMS to see if that had any effect. I
 also turned off apf and inserted rules manually into iptables to reduce
 the number of iptable rules the system has to process.

 All that doesn't seem to help much, I'm still getting consistent server
 loads in the 2.x to 3.x range almost all the time.

 The problem is using top, none of my processes are showing abnormal
 CPU%, most are well under 5%, manually adding them up doesn't equate the
 200% to 300% the load figures of 2.x and 3.x are indicating.

 Even top's own summary says CPU % is in the 20~30% range, what's
 worrying is the System% is also in the same range. I have no idea what
 is system doing since it appears that anything running inside the
 kernel is lumped under system. Or why even totalling both % up, I
 would expect 50~60% to translate to the expected load of 0.5~0.6 yet
 system load stats is 5x what's expected.

 I've installed utilities like dstat to try to see if I can figure out
 which process is making the system calls that is clogging up the server
 but either I don't understand it or it's not the right tool.

 So I'll appreciate some advice on how/what should I do next to identify
 the cause. Thanks in advance!

Dstat could at least tell you if your problem is CPU or I/O.

Even better, run

vmstat 2 10

Look at the first two columns.  What column have higher numbers?  If r, 
you're CPU-bound.  If b, you're I/O bound.

If you're I/O bound, I suggest you use atop to determine which processes 
take disk time.

You can also use iostat -x 2 10.

I really suggest you read on vmstat and iostat, they will always be helpful.

Did you check if you have a defect disk or a rebuilding array?  That 
could be the cause.

Regards,

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread William Warren
I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system.  Can i upgrade 
that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should 
i just back it up and do it from scratch?  Also will the samba version 
in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

Links to tips and tricks are appreciated..:)

Sincerely,
William Warren
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread Barry Brimer
 I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system.  Can i upgrade
 that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should
 i just back it up and do it from scratch?  Also will the samba version
 in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

I would strongly suggest backing it up and building a fresh CentOS 5.  Red 
Hat doesn't encourage you to upgrade from RHEL 4 to RHEL 5, I certainly 
wouldn't try it from Fedora 4.  I do not have any Windows 7 systems 
connecting to my Samba servers, so I can not help you with that.

Barry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:48 PM, William Warren
hescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com wrote:

 Also will the samba version
 in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

You would need samba3 for Windows 7 support. Try the SerNet Samba 3
Repository. Please see
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories for more
details.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread 唐建伟
Well, I also suggest you do a fresh installation. And, win7 can access
the samba in centerOS.


On 12/31/09, Barry Brimer li...@brimer.org wrote:
 I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system.  Can i upgrade
 that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should
 i just back it up and do it from scratch?  Also will the samba version
 in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

 I would strongly suggest backing it up and building a fresh CentOS 5.  Red
 Hat doesn't encourage you to upgrade from RHEL 4 to RHEL 5, I certainly
 wouldn't try it from Fedora 4.  I do not have any Windows 7 systems
 connecting to my Samba servers, so I can not help you with that.

 Barry
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Tang Jianwei
System Administrator
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread Corey Chandler
William Warren wrote:
 I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system.  Can i upgrade 
 that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should 
 i just back it up and do it from scratch?  Also will the samba version 
 in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

 Links to tips and tricks are appreciated..:)

 Sincerely,
 William Warren
   

That's so far from supported that I wouldn't even know WHERE to begin...

-- Corey / KB1JWQ
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] upgrade adivce

2009-12-30 Thread William Warren
On 12/30/2009 8:23 PM, Corey Chandler wrote:
 William Warren wrote:

 I have a new client that is running a fedora 4 system.  Can i upgrade
 that box to centos 5 with a reasonable expectation of success or should
 i just back it up and do it from scratch?  Also will the samba version
 in centos 5 natively support windows 7 clients?

 Links to tips and tricks are appreciated..:)

 Sincerely,
 William Warren

  
 That's so far from supported that I wouldn't even know WHERE to begin...

 -- Corey / KB1JWQ
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



ok so the upgrade is out..:)  Just need to make sure when they bring in 
windows 7 machine(this machine runs as a pdc) the 7 clients can connect 
without huge amounts of headaches hence why i was looking at cent 5.  
I'm not into using third part repos for cent 5 so if the samba native to 
cent 5 won't do windows 7 clients without huge issues then i'll have to 
find workarounds..:)
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-30 Thread fred smith
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote:
 
  I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me. 
  Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked.
  
  The link to it is here which is an old ticket:
  
  http://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/705
  
  I've tested it and it works! Presumably, it might have worked in some of
  my previous attempts, but I only now figured out that I need to manually
  attach the device via device menu or USB icon. Not exactly plug and play,
  but workable.
 
  The mount command itself is sufficient here, no need to stop vboxdrv (or
  vboxnet, which doesn't exist), or chmod g+rw /dev/vboxdrv.
 
  Thanks, Max!

A late addition to this thread:

I just got an external USB drive and wanted to access it from my XP
guest. I couldn't figure it out, but I did remember seeing this thread.

i did the steps in the first posting (or at least the first one I still
have) and it worked. then I went to look at the virtualbox forum post
whose URL is above. I see it has us commenting out the /proc/usb things
in rc.sysinit. I've done that, but I assume I need to reboot to see the
result (and I don't reboot unless forced to), but I also wonder what
else I'm breaking by commenting out those lines. Anybody got any ideas
on that?

Thanks!


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Community in each Country

2009-12-30 Thread Christopher Chan

 I expect support from all friends

I hope you do not get disappointed but setting too high an expectation 
is not healthy.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] [OT] CAT5 IP-capable rackmount KVM units?

2009-12-30 Thread Thomas Harold
Rather off-topic, but I'm looking for IP-based KVMs (~16 ports) that can 
handle both PS/2 and USB hookups on the server side.  All of the answers 
over at Slashdot are a few years out of date and it looks like prices on 
KVM head units have dropped a bit over the years.

Some of the older units only worked with Windows, Internet Explorer and 
ActiveX.  Others like the ATEN KH1516i supposedly use Java and are far 
better from a cross-platform point of view.

I'm on the fence about the CAT5 cables over the more traditional style, 
it seems like the CAT5 cable system would give a lot more flexibility in 
dealing with USB vs PS/2 servers (or even serial only?).  The bigger 
advantage with the CAT5 stuff seems to be fewer length limitations and 
less space used in the rack for the head unit.

I'm guessing that the CAT5 adapters are going to be proprietary?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] stock openjdk vs. epel

2009-12-30 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
 Rex Dieter wrote:

 OK, found it, I'll go knock some skulls @ epel.

 Bug filed,
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504189

 folks poked, hopefully will see a resolution soonish.

 -- Rex


Still no java browser plugin for Centos?  I've been reading the web
all night on this, getting angry.  I can't find any explanation about
why EPEL did have a working browser plugin, but then Centos introduced
versions of those same packages that had the plugin removed.  Not to
mention the fact that Centos keeps the older version (b09) of
java-1.6.0, and yet yum seems to think it is a newer version.

So far, the only adequate approach I've found is to install the
java-1.6.0-openjdk packages that used to be in EPEL repositories.
Every yum update fails after that because yum tries to install the
versions from Centos updates, but those updates fail because they
don't satisfy the plugin requirement. That's not great because there
are some security fixes that come along with the Centos version.

It just seems silly to leave it this way.  Are the experts just sick
of dealing with each other?

I've been looking at the SRPM files for the competing
java-1.6.0-openjdk packages from Centos and EPEL trying to figure how
to make a plugin package in the EPEL style but from the java base in
Centos.

Well, I'm sorry if these words are too critical.  I appreciate the
efforts everyone has been making on this.

pj


-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] yum centos repo dependency hell for matlab loaddap

2009-12-30 Thread Dave
I've got matlab installed:
M
A T L A B (R) 
 Copyright
1984-2009 The MathWorks, Inc.
   Version
7.8.0.347 (R2009a) 64-bit (glnxa64)

February 12, 2009

I want to install loaddap. I downloaded an rpm from
http://opendap.org/download/ml-structs.html.

# yum --nogpgcheck localinstall loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security
Setting up Local Package Process[snip]
-- Processing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) for package: loaddap
-- Processing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) for package: loaddap
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libdapclient.so.3()(64bit) is needed by
package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libdap.so.9()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libmat.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 from loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm has depsolving problems
  -- Missing Dependency: libdap = 3.8.0 is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libdapclient.so.3()(64bit) is needed by
package loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libmx.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libdap = 3.8.0 is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libdap.so.9()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libmat.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)
Error: Missing Dependency: libmex.so()(64bit) is needed by package
loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64 (loaddap-3.6.1-1.x86_64.rpm)

Apparently my libdap is too old:
# rpm -q libdap
libdap-3.7.8-1.el5.1

And it is current with the centos repos,
# yum update libdap
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, security
[snip]
No Packages marked for Update

so I need a good rev source rpm
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos