Re: [CentOS] Setting apache's maxclients higher than 256 in CentOS
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 4:14 AM, robert mena wrote: > Hi, > I could not find any reference if the version of apache compiled for centos > 5.x has support for more than 256 clients in apache's maxclients. > If that is not the case how can I recompile the package with such support? > Regards. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > That is a bad memory from Apache 1.x times, when by default your serverlimit was hardcoded to 256. There is no such limit in v 2.2 of Apache in Centos, so make sure you have raised your MaxClients and ServerLimit in httpd.conf as needed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Unloking gnome keyring on login
I hope someone can help me because I have spent a week on this and still I can't make it to work. I have a CentOS 5.5 server and I am trying to set it up so that upon login the gnome default keyring is unlocked. I don't have a desktop as users will login using ssh only. I have search the forum and google it, and I did find some help. All the articles though said to change /etc/pam.d/gdm (which I think is for the Gnome Desktop Manager). I did it anyway but no joy. I tried changin /etc/pam.d/login, and no joy. I'm becoming a bit desperate. The changes I have done are to add auth optional pam_keyring.so (sometimes with try_first_pass) and sessionoptional pam_keyring.so auto_start (sometimes without auto_start) All the time the gnome-keyring-daemon is not started. But even if I start it at login, with a new /etc/prodile.d/gnome-keyring-daemon.sh script which runs export `/usr/bin/gnome-keyring-daemon`, the keyring is not unlocked at login. Just to let you know, I use the keyring to store passwords for a Subversion repository. The first time, after logging in, I use Subversion I am asked for the password to unlock the keyring. Then everything goes fine, i.e. I'm not ask for the Subversion password. After I sorted this out I need to set the server so that the keyring password is changed automatically when the user changes his login password (I tried alread, changing /etc/pam.d/passwd similarly as I've done above but it's not working) So, please can anyone help me? Thanks Giulio Linedata Limited Registered Office: 85 Gracechurch St., London, EC3V 0AA Registered in England and Wales No 3475006 VAT Reg No 710 3140 03 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has done it before. On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the share from certain groups. It does not appear possible, using the current kernel-based NFS server, to export an NFS-mounted filesystem. However, it appears that there is a FUSE NFS project that might work. Does anyone have any experience with such a setup? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
re-exporting a nfs mount with the kernel nfs server works for me. On 07/13/2010 04:01 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has > done it before. > > On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the > server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The > clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance > issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating > the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the > server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that > version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running > CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. > This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the > share from certain groups. > > It does not appear possible, using the current kernel-based NFS > server, to export an NFS-mounted filesystem. However, it appears that > there is a FUSE NFS project that might work. Does anyone have any > experience with such a setup? > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Juergen Gotteswinter wrote: > re-exporting a nfs mount with the kernel nfs server works for me. Did you need to do anything special to get it to work? I am mounting an NFS3 share and exporting that same filesystem as NFS2. These are the types of errors I get: Jul 12 18:07:28 mrmbc01v04 mountd[12194]: authenticated mount request from 10.201.54.113:906 for /mnt/nfs_test (/mnt/nfs_test) Jul 12 18:07:28 mrmbc01v04 mountd[12194]: Cannot export /mnt/nfs_test, possibly unsupported filesystem or fsid= required ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
Kwan Lowe wrote: > I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has > done it before. > > On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the > server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The > clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance > issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating > the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the > server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that > version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running > CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. > This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the > share from certain groups. You might look at unfs, which can re-export. I used it with glusterfs, so as to have a head node. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Jul 13, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has > done it before. > > On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the > server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The > clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance > issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating > the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the > server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that > version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running > CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. > This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the > share from certain groups. > > It does not appear possible, using the current kernel-based NFS > server, to export an NFS-mounted filesystem. However, it appears that > there is a FUSE NFS project that might work. Does anyone have any > experience with such a setup? Can the clients do CIFS mounts of the Windows share? -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Superblock Problem [SOLVED]
Le 2010-07-02 09:35, Guy Boisvert a écrit : > > Yes i tried to boot with the other kernels, same result. I'll check > device.map soon (i'm offsite now). > > Thanks. > Finally, i decided to download the latest CentOS version DVD and do an upgrade. I booted from the DVD, typed "linux upgrade" and voilà! The server rebooted and worked as expected. Is there anybody on the list that could explain why it happened? Maybe there was a couple of "yum update" containing kernel updates without reboot. I cannot think for now of anything other than that. Guy Boisvert IngTegration inc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
At Tue, 13 Jul 2010 10:01:18 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > I have an issue that is not all that unique, so I'm hoping someone has > done it before. > > On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the > server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The > clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance > issues were discovered with the setup. For various reasons, updating > the client is not an option at this time. The fix the issue, the > server needs to export NFS3 mounts but the clients do not support that > version. As a workaround, I considered adding a third system running > CentOS that would mount the server and re-export it to the clients. > This will mitigate the current issue related to visibility of the > share from certain groups. > > It does not appear possible, using the current kernel-based NFS > server, to export an NFS-mounted filesystem. However, it appears that > there is a FUSE NFS project that might work. Does anyone have any > experience with such a setup? It really is NOT a good idea to re-export a network-mounted file system. Is there some reason you cannot simply migrate the data on the Windows 2008 server to a new CentOS system? Note that you can also install Samba on the new CentOS system, which will support any MS-Windows clients served by the Windows 2008 server. One possibity would be to install a virtual CentOS server on the Windows 2008 server and have it *replace* the NFS server running on the Windows 2008 server. You would need to map the file systems to be exported as local/virtual file systems on the virtual CentOS server. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > -- Robert Heller -- Get the Deepwoods Software FireFox Toolbar! Deepwoods Software-- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database hel...@deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote: > > It really is NOT a good idea to re-export a network-mounted file system. > Is there some reason you cannot simply migrate the data on the Windows > 2008 server to a new CentOS system? Note that you can also install > Samba on the new CentOS system, which will support any MS-Windows > clients served by the Windows 2008 server. > > One possibity would be to install a virtual CentOS server on the Windows > 2008 server and have it *replace* the NFS server running on the Windows > 2008 server. You would need to map the file systems to be exported as > local/virtual file systems on the virtual CentOS server. Thanks Robert...Unfortunately, changes to the server and client require a large effort. The systems are only accessible remotely, are in use 24 hours a day for two to three weeks at a time, and making any change, even adding a script, requires re-certification. Mark - thanks.. I will look at unfs.. Ross - We considered that option and may consider it if re-exporting a share is possible with CIFS. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] [Vulgarly-Selfish-Commercial] Project: Private Super computer (HPC) in a Private cloud
Greetings, I am atempting to build the above captioned environment. I will contribute to this list my learnings. I need income as I need to fund this project. Threre are various revenue sharing models I have in mind. One size just cant fit all after all. (angel investors or whatever, anybody)? My offer: "Every reply for this thread will get INR 11/- from me iff only I could remit my money in a single click to the thread posters and me." Learners should pay Rs. 21/- to cober my private tution charges and establishment charges that they choose engage with. Please contact me offlist. Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [Vulgarly-Selfish-Commercial] Project: Private Super computer (HPC) in a Private cloud
Greetings, On 7/13/10, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: > Greetings, > > My offer: > "Every reply for this thread will get INR 11/- from me iff only I > could remit my money in a single click to the thread posters and me." oops!, "Every reply" Should have read; "Every verifiable reply" As at the core of fthis request is Auditable verifiability. Regards Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] os that rather uses the gpu?
Does someone know a distribution/operating system, that rather uses the GPU for "working", not the CPU? [by default] Or this solution is still in the "beginning part"? Thanks for any tips, link, suggestions. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:17 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Robert Heller wrote: >> >> It really is NOT a good idea to re-export a network-mounted file system. >> Is there some reason you cannot simply migrate the data on the Windows >> 2008 server to a new CentOS system? Note that you can also install >> Samba on the new CentOS system, which will support any MS-Windows >> clients served by the Windows 2008 server. >> >> One possibity would be to install a virtual CentOS server on the Windows >> 2008 server and have it *replace* the NFS server running on the Windows >> 2008 server. You would need to map the file systems to be exported as >> local/virtual file systems on the virtual CentOS server. > > Thanks Robert...Unfortunately, changes to the server and client > require a large effort. The systems are only accessible remotely, are > in use 24 hours a day for two to three weeks at a time, and making any > change, even adding a script, requires re-certification. > > Mark - thanks.. I will look at unfs.. > > Ross - We considered that option and may consider it if re-exporting a > share is possible with CIFS. Well on the 2008 box you can have a share available by NFSv3 AND CIFS and on the old Redhat boxes you might be able to mount the CIFS share since they don't support NFSv3, though if they don't support NFSv3 I have my doubts they support mounting CIFS as well. Is it that NFSv2 itself is insecure, or only the Windows implementation of NFSv2? Is NFSv2 on CentOS an acceptable substitute? Can you relocate the data? You might be painted into a corner here, being forced to upgrade under duress. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Unloking gnome keyring on login
Giulio Troccoli wrote: > I hope someone can help me because I have spent a week on this and > still I can't make it to work. > > I have a CentOS 5.5 server and I am trying to set it up so that upon > login the gnome default keyring is unlocked. I don't have a desktop > as users will login using ssh only. I have a similar situation. I'm not quite familiar enough with linux to know if my experience will help you. Anyway ... I boot my laptop home computer (1 user) into runlevel 5 with *auto-login*. It has wifi built-in, and I wanted to set it up to auto-connect, _and_ not have to enter the keyring password. I tried making the keyring's password the same as the user's - didn't work. To test the process, I turned off auto-login - it worked! My semi-newbie skills led me to the conclusion that, if gnome does not have to ask for the password (auto-login mode), then the keyring manager never sees it (and asks for it anyway). Conversely, if gnome has to ask for the password (standard log-in mode), the keyring manager sees it, and the keyring is unlocked. To help me learn a bit more, inform me how much this applies to your situation. You're working on a server; do you use auto-login for your own account? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On 07/13/2010 07:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the > server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The > clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance > issues were discovered with the setup. I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these systems, that they don't support NFSv3? And what kind of compliance issues? I don't know of any security enhancements that were introduced in NFSv3. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 07/13/2010 07:01 AM, Kwan Lowe wrote: >> On the client end I have some very old RedHat based systems. On the >> server end is a Windows 2008 system running NFS server software. The >> clients mount the server resource as an NFS2 mount but some compliance >> issues were discovered with the setup. > > I'm not sure I can help, but I'm very curious. How old are these > systems, that they don't support NFSv3? And what kind of compliance > issues? I don't know of any security enhancements that were introduced > in NFSv3. It's a combination of some very old (RH2.1) systems and a rigid certification process. In short, once the machines are built it's very, very difficult to modify the setup. Not only are they only available by a satellite link on only certain days, but the systems are critical and don't have maintenance windows. Every few years they may get updated ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > Well on the 2008 box you can have a share available by NFSv3 AND CIFS and on > the old Redhat boxes you might be able to mount the CIFS share since they > don't support NFSv3, though if they don't support NFSv3 I have my doubts they > support mounting CIFS as well. > > Is it that NFSv2 itself is insecure, or only the Windows implementation of > NFSv2? Is NFSv2 on CentOS an acceptable substitute? Can you relocate the data? > > You might be painted into a corner here, being forced to upgrade under duress. > It's not specifically NFS, but more related to how the application stack was designed. We are essentially working around some 6 year old design decisions. When they were built, little thought was placed on allowing full access as the systems are on an isolated network. Over the years, other systems began to interface to the original application. Because one of those systems fall is a compliance target system, the original box needs to be compliant also. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network interfaces in the Kernel? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
2010/7/14 William Warren : > I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it > anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network > interfaces in the Kernel? can you really create hardware with huge number or real ethernet controllers? -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re-exporting an NFS mount.. Possible?
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:23 PM, Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > >> Well on the 2008 box you can have a share available by NFSv3 AND CIFS and on >> the old Redhat boxes you might be able to mount the CIFS share since they >> don't support NFSv3, though if they don't support NFSv3 I have my doubts >> they support mounting CIFS as well. >> >> Is it that NFSv2 itself is insecure, or only the Windows implementation of >> NFSv2? Is NFSv2 on CentOS an acceptable substitute? Can you relocate the >> data? >> >> You might be painted into a corner here, being forced to upgrade under >> duress. >> > > It's not specifically NFS, but more related to how the application > stack was designed. We are essentially working around some 6 year old > design decisions. When they were built, little thought was placed on > allowing full access as the systems are on an isolated network. Over > the years, other systems began to interface to the original > application. Because one of those systems fall is a compliance target > system, the original box needs to be compliant also. Hmmm, maybe the problem isn't necessarily the NFS setup but the interface of the lower trusted systems. Maybe developing a bastion host between the trusted and non-trusted networks would solve the compliance issue? Separate VLANs, firewall host that uses forward and reverse NAT or possibly application proxy to limit the protocols and the hosts that use them across the trusted network. Detailed logging to a central log host for auditing. If done with care it could be done with minimal interruption. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > 2010/7/14 William Warren : >> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it >> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network >> interfaces in the Kernel? > > can you really create hardware with huge number or real ethernet controllers? With tagged VLANs, bridges and virtual switches, is there a need for that many physical interfaces? -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
On 7/13/2010 9:11 PM, Ross Walker wrote: > On Jul 13, 2010, at 8:58 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: > >> 2010/7/14 William Warren: >>> I think it's baloney mainly because i can't find a mention of it >>> anywhere. Is there REALLY a limit on the number of physical network >>> interfaces in the Kernel? >> can you really create hardware with huge number or real ethernet controllers? > With tagged VLANs, bridges and virtual switches, is there a need for that > many physical interfaces? > > -Ross > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a linux system. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Linux Kernel Physical Interface Limit
On 7/14/10, William Warren wrote: > ok let me specify. Is there any real limit? I've seen some folks(and > been told by a few) that you can't more than 10 physical interfaces in a > linux system. Googling up a really old 2005 newsgroup thread says some people had 24 physical NIC (6x 4quad) in a system before and one person vaguely remembers a hard 256 limit which would make sense if physical interface count is a byte value. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Running yum shows errors
Hi
I am getting the following errors when i try to use yum to install the
net-snmp paclages.
[r...@sc1 yum.repos.d]# yum install net-snmp
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Determining fastest mirrors
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/yum", line 29, in ?
yummain.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 229, in user_main
errcode = main(args)
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/yummain.py", line 104, in main
result, resultmsgs = base.doCommands()
File "/usr/share/yum-cli/cli.py", line 339, in doCommands
self._getTs(needTsRemove)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 101, in
_getTs
self._getTsInfo(remove_only)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 112, in
_getTsInfo
pkgSack = self.pkgSack
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 591, in
pkgSack = property(fget=lambda self: self._getSacks(),
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/__init__.py", line 434, in
_getSacks
self.repos.populateSack(which=repos)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/repos.py", line 223, in
populateSack
self.doSetup()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/repos.py", line 71, in doSetup
self.ayum.plugins.run('postreposetup')
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/plugins.py", line 176, in run
func(conduitcls(self, self.base, conf, **kwargs))
File "/usr/lib/yum-plugins/fastestmirror.py", line 176, in
postreposetup_hook
if downgrade_ftp and _len_non_ftp(repo.urls) == 1:
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 585, in
urls = property(fget=lambda self: self._geturls(),
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 582, in
_geturls
self._baseurlSetup()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 538, in
_baseurlSetup
mirrorurls.extend(self._getMirrorList())
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/yum/yumRepo.py", line 1349, in
_getMirrorList
fo = urlgrabber.grabber.urlopen(url, proxies=self.proxy_dict)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
612, in urlopen
return default_grabber.urlopen(url, **kwargs)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
891, in urlopen
return self._retry(opts, retryfunc, url)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
852, in _retry
r = apply(func, (opts,) + args, {})
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
890, in retryfunc
return URLGrabberFileObject(url, filename=None, opts=opts)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
1008, in __init__
self._do_open()
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
1091, in _do_open
fo, hdr = self._make_request(req, opener)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/urlgrabber/grabber.py", line
1204, in _make_request
fo = opener.open(req)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 358, in open
response = self._open(req, data)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 376, in _open
'_open', req)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain
result = func(*args)
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 573, in
lambda r, proxy=url, type=type, meth=self.proxy_open: \
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 580, in proxy_open
if '@' in host:
TypeError: iterable argument required
Please let me know what needs to be done.
Thanks
Jatin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
