Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Re: Problem with yum

[James Hogarth]

Well a reboot would have the consequence of killing all processes and free
up memory...

Sent using Android mobile

On 20 Jul 2010 22:25, "James B. Byrne"  wrote:
>
> On Mon, July 19, 2010 16:01, James Hogarth wrote:
>> Sent from Android mobile
>>
>> -- Forwarded message --
>> From: "James Hogarth" 
>> Date: 19 Jul 2010 21:00
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with yum
>> To: "CentOS mailing list" 
>>
>> With the kernel logging an out of memory error? My first instinct
>> would be
>> to check free to see the status of RAM and swap and perhaps end
>> unnecessary
>> processes..
>
>
> What I ended up doing was rebooting the server and that seems to
> have cleared the problem. Trying yum clear all did not work as the
> yum process stalled as before.
>
> --
> *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
> James B. Byrne mailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca
> Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca
> 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241
> Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757
> Canada L8E 3C3
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] LVM issue

[Peter Kjellstrom]

On Wednesday 21 July 2010, Phil Manuel wrote:
> Hi We use AoE disks for some of our systems.  Currently, a 15.65Tb
> filesystem we have is full, I then extended the LVM by a further 4Tb but
> resize4fs could not handle a filesystem over 16Tb (CentOS 5.5).

It's even worse, ext4 (with current userspace tools) can't handle >16T even if 
you mkfs it from scratch...

/Peter


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?

[Stephen Harris]

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:51:15PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 08:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:45:36PM -0600, Ski Dawg wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> Today, I ran across a directory in /etc/ on one of our servers whose
> >> permissions where set to 600 (drw---) with root being the owner.
> >
> > Heheheheh.  That machine is so broken.  Even 0700 would be unbelievably
> > broken
> 
> Why?

Sorry, I mis-read.  I had thought you'd written that /etc itself was 0600.
That'd be so broken...


-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?

[Fernando Gleiser]

- Original Message 
> From: Robert Heller 
> To: CentOS mailing list 
> Cc: CentOS mailing list 
> Sent: Tue, July 20, 2010 9:17:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?
> 
> > 
> > um... on a directory, the X bit means you can LS the  contents of the 
> > directory.   of course, root ignores this anyways  and overrides it.
> 
> Note that execute access is only needed on a directory  if you want to
> list its contents (eg ls).  If you know ahead of time the  name of the
> file in the directory you seek to access, you don't need execute  access
> on the directory.  Not having execute access on a directory  keeps
> 'noisy' people from discovering the contents of the directory.   This is
> a not unreasonably security setting.


Nope. for dirs, 'w' means "you can create and delete files" (because creating 
and deleting files means inserting and removing entries in the dir), "r" means 
"you can list the dir" (which makes sense, since what 'ls' does is reading the 
dir entries. 'x' means "you can cd into the directory) 




Fer



  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] disabling touchpad in CentOS 5.5

[ken]

On 07/20/2010 11:09 PM Sameer Oak wrote:
> I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days back. The laptop
> has some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating me while typing.
> 
> Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.
> 
> --
> Regards,
> - samoak.

Find out what the driver module is and remove it.

-- 
Find research and analysis on US healthcare, health insurance,
and health policy at: 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] samba upgrade 3.0 - 3.x problem convert passdb.tdb

[camun]

Hello

after several days of searching, I have not found a definitive answer to the
problem samba Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x. (Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x
Can Fail to Update passdb.tdb Correctly (bug # 6195) .

passdb.tdb break occurs in the file where the new samba starts.

Any suggestions or someone going through the same problem?

(I'm running samba 3.0.28 with upgrade to 3.5.4 (Sernet repo)
[]´s
Camun.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Trigger after yum update

[przemolicc]

Hello,

we have installed non-repository based software on our centos servers (e.g. 
vmware tools).
Each time we do 'yum update' we have to run several scripts to check if these 
software
works after update.
Sometimes we forget ...
It it possible to configure any sort of triggers which will
run automatically after 'yum update' ?
I'd like to avoid writing shell wrappers for yum and looking for yum-way 
solution ;-)

Regards
Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)





























--
Wyprzedaz do -70%!!! Wejdz na Endo.pl
http://linkint.pl/f2791

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] disabling touchpad in CentOS 5.5

[Rob Kampen]

Sameer Oak wrote:
I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days
back. The laptop has some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating
me while typing.
  
Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.

why not disable in the bios?

--
Regards,
- samoak.
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  



<>___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] disabling touchpad in CentOS 5.5

[Luigi Castro Cardeles]

Hi,

try that:
/usr/bin/synclient TouchpadOff=1*

*i use that on Fedora*.
*[]'s*
*Luigi Castro Cardeles


2010/7/21 Rob Kampen 

>  Sameer Oak wrote:
>
> I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days back. The laptop has
> some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating me while typing.
>
> Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.
>
> why not disable in the bios?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> - samoak.
>
> --
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing 
> listcen...@centos.orghttp://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?

[Ski Dawg]

Thank you to everyone for the replies. The system(s) in question is a
CentOS 5.5 server(s) (both development and production). The directory
in question, in this case, is a firewall program (and monitor) to
assist us with ip tables. I am also asking the developers of this
product, as to why the directory is 600 and not 700.

(see below for more response)

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Gordon Messmer  wrote:
> On 07/20/2010 08:30 PM, Keith Keller wrote:
>>
>> IOW, ls will work fine, but ls -l will not.  (To be specific, a plain
>> old /bin/ls will work fine.  If you have any ls options that need to read
>> the contents of the directory, like -l or -F, it'll b0rk.)
>
> Well, to be *specific*, reading the contents of the directory is
> allowed.  That's what 'ls' will do.  The attributes of the files
> contained within the directory are not read from the directory.  They're
> returned by stat() on the paths composed of the directory path plus the
> names returned by reading the directory.  The stat() call will fail,
> since you can read the directory's own content, but cannot access any of
> the items within the directory.

I did some more testing, and if the directory is owned by root, and
the permissions are either 0600 or 0700 only root can cd into it or
even do an ls (or ls -l) on it and see the contents.

If the directory is owned by a non-privileged user, and the directory
is 0600, then that user can do an ls on the directory (ls dir/) and
see the files. When that same user does an ls -l on the directory (ls
-l dir/), it will show the files, but not attributes of the files.
This same non-privileged user is not allowed to cd into the directory
either. If the directory is 0700, then the non-privileged user that is
the owner (and root) can cd into it, as well as do a ls -l to see the
file attributes.

OK, my question from all of this is what is the difference between
0600 and 0700 for a directory that is owned by root? I see the
difference for a directory owned by a non-privileged user, but if root
is the owner, then only root can do anything with it, or see anything
in it, and root will ignore the fact that the execute bit is not set
for the owner. So what is the benefit of making a root owned directory
0600 instead of 0700?
-- 
Doug

Registered Linux User #285548 (http://counter.li.org)

Never trust a computer you can't throw out a window.
   -- Steve Wozniak
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Fsck on mdraid array

[Jussi Hirvi]

Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck 
everything. But I cannot.

The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot, 
/, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.

So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file 
systems, and try to run
fsck -y /dev/md0
fsck -y /dev/md1
fsck -y /dev/md2

For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..." 
"The device does not seem to contain a valid ext2 filesystem..."

Well, of course not, the filesystem is ext3, not ext2.

I also tried fsck.ext3, but the error messages stay the same.

So, how could I fsck these arrays?

- Jussi

-- 
Jussi Hirvi * Green Spot
Topeliuksenkatu 15 C * 00250 Helsinki * Finland
Tel. +358 9 493 981 * Mobile +358 40 771 2098 (only sms)
jussi.hi...@greenspot.fi * http://www.greenspot.fi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] samba upgrade 3.0 - 3.x error convert passdb.tdb

[camun]

Hello

after several days of searching, I have not found a definitive answer to the
problem samba Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x. (Migrating from 3.0.x to 3.3.x
Can Fail to Update passdb.tdb Correctly (bug # 6195) .

passdb.tdb break occurs in the file where the new samba starts.

Any suggestions or someone going through the same problem?

(I'm running samba 3.0.28 with upgrade to 3.5.4 (Sernet repo)
[]´s
Camun.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Trigger after yum update

[Ned Slider]

On 21/07/10 14:50, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote:
> Hello,
>
> we have installed non-repository based software on our centos servers (e.g. 
> vmware tools).
> Each time we do 'yum update' we have to run several scripts to check if these 
> software
> works after update.
> Sometimes we forget ...
> It it possible to configure any sort of triggers which will
> run automatically after 'yum update' ?
> I'd like to avoid writing shell wrappers for yum and looking for yum-way 
> solution ;-)
>
> Regards
> Przemyslaw Bak (przemol)
>

How about using RPM's %triggerin scriptlet?

http://www.rpm.org/api/4.4.2.2/triggers.html
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-rpm2/

For example, you could create a dummy rpm package containing a 
%triggerin scriptlet to run your scripts in the event that package foo 
gets installed/updated.

Lets take vmware as an example (although it's probably not a very good 
example). I assume you need to run vmware-config.pl after each kernel 
update and you sometime forget to do that. You could build and install a 
dummy package that contains a %triggerin scriptlet that triggers on 
installation of the package kernel. In an ideal world the %triggerin 
scriptlet would simply run /usr/bin/vmware-config.pl, but as that script 
requires user interaction, you'd probably have to call it with the 
--default flag to provide the default answers to all questions. 
Alternatively, you might decide not to run the vmware-config.pl script 
automatically but rather send an email to root or something else to 
remind you to run it.

Is that the type of solution you're looking for?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Fsck on mdraid array

[Arun Khan]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:42 PM, Jussi Hirvi  wrote:
> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck
> everything. But I cannot.
>
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot,
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
> systems, and try to run
>        fsck -y /dev/md0
>        fsck -y /dev/md1
>        fsck -y /dev/md2
>
> For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..."
> "The device does not seem to contain a valid ext2 filesystem..."

ext2 is the base of the journaling ext3 FS.

I  would suggest you use TestDisk
 and see if you can recover
your filesystem.
The tool is powerful.  I have been able to recover disk partitions and
the filesystems within when all other tools reported "no disk
partition" on the HDD.

Good luck.
-- Arun Khan
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] disabling touchpad in CentOS 5.5

[Brunner, Brian T.]

A plastic square/rectangle amounting to a large "credit card" for
thickness and resilience, placed over the mouse pad and buttons,  will
keep your hands/palms from moving or clicking your touchpad/mouse while
you're typing.  Said sheet can be removed as many times, and as often,
as needed to use the touchpad itself.  This is faster than removing and
re-installing the pad driver.

> On 07/20/2010 11:09 PM Sameer Oak wrote:
> > I've HP 520 laptop. I installed CentOS 5.5 a few days back. 
> The laptop 
> > has some weird placing of touchpad that is frustrating me 
> while typing.
> > 
> > Please advise me how to disable touchpad on CentOS 5.5.
***
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please
notify the system manager. This footnote also confirms that this
email message has been swept for the presence of computer viruses.
www.Hubbell.com - Hubbell Incorporated**

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Fsck on mdraid array

[Ross Walker]

On Jul 21, 2010, at 12:12 PM, Jussi Hirvi  wrote:

> Something seems to be wrong with my file systems, and I want to fsck 
> everything. But I cannot.
> 
> The setup consists of 2 hds, carrying 3 raid1 (ext3) file systems (boot, 
> /, swap). OS is up-to-date CentOS 5.
> 
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file 
> systems, and try to run
>fsck -y /dev/md0
>fsck -y /dev/md1
>fsck -y /dev/md2
> 
> For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..." 
> "The device does not seem to contain a valid ext2 filesystem..."
> 
> Well, of course not, the filesystem is ext3, not ext2.
> 
> I also tried fsck.ext3, but the error messages stay the same.
> 
> So, how could I fsck these arrays?

Are you using lvm on top of the mdraid?

If so you need to fsck the lvs not the mds.

-Ross

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?

[Robert Nichols]

On 07/21/2010 10:30 AM, Ski Dawg wrote:
> OK, my question from all of this is what is the difference between
> 0600 and 0700 for a directory that is owned by root? I see the
> difference for a directory owned by a non-privileged user, but if root
> is the owner, then only root can do anything with it, or see anything
> in it, and root will ignore the fact that the execute bit is not set
> for the owner. So what is the benefit of making a root owned directory
> 0600 instead of 0700?

For a directory, no difference aside from a command like 'find' explicitly
testing permission bits.  The mode could just as well be .

For an ordinary file, there would be a difference.  For root to execute
a file, at least one of the three execute permission bits must be set.

-- 
Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address.
 Do NOT delete it.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

[Devin Reade]

Boris Epstein  wrote:

> We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would
> like to set up something where I can easily have more than one
> redundant server, security/authentication

Have you considered an NFS cluster based on pacemaker/openais/corosync?
See .  One possible config is an active/passive
cluster using NFS on top of DRBD.  I've never clustered samba, but it
looks like others have done it:


Google will show you various problems with active/active clusters related to
both GFS2 and samba.  Don't try to have your NFS servers also be NFS
clients.

For reasonable security/authentication, you'd probably want to integrate
with kerberos.

Devin

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] DSL battling rojter - help!

[Mark]

[SOLVED]

At least for the most part - the immediate solution was to set my
CentOS box to a static IP address and then connect it directly to the
modem.

Once that worked, I moved my machine's connection back to the router,
but since the router's WAN connection settings don't seem to work (at
all), I just plugged the modem and the Windows box into the router's
LAN ports.  Once I gave the Windows box it's own static IP address as
well, both machines seem to be happy and can access the web through
the router-acting-as-a-switch.

Many thanks to JohnS for pointing and then guiding me in the right direction.

Mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Audio fails on centos 5.5 sony laptop - snd-hda-intel

[Rob Kampen]

Rob Kampen wrote:

  
Akemi Yagi wrote:
  
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Ned Slider  wrote:
  

  On 20/07/10 03:08, Rob Kampen wrote:


  
Still no joy - I am at a loss to know what to check - if I boot a 194
kernel no sound, 164 kernel is fine - why the regression?
Same configs, same modules loaded but now no sound - what can I check to
determine problem and find a solution?
no errors in logs or dmesg
  
  
  I would suggest you start checking back through the changelogs between
kernel-2.6.18-194.el5 and kernel-2.6.18-164.el5, find likely candidates
that may have caused your issue and then rebuild a testing kernel with
that patch reverted. If that testing kernel fixes your issue then you've
identified the issue and can file a bug report upstream.

To start you on your way, this patch looks like a likely candidate for
you to investigate further:

* Mon Dec 21 2009 Jarod Wilson  [2.6.18-183.el5]
- [sound] alsa hda driver update for rhel5.5 (Jaroslav Kysela) [525390]



Rob,

I understand you have already tried a workaround reported in:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586532
  
  
correct, I've had to use this on a number of nvidia based machines
already (unfortunately).
In this instance it was no help - not surprising as it is not an nvidia
controller but intel chipset albeit with an nvidia graphics chip.
Before I bother Gary I'll try to revert to a default centos kernel
rather than the centosplus kernel just to be sure.
Will keep you posted.

I have installed the standard Centos 2.6.18-194.8.1 .el5 kernel on the
sony laptop and this fares no better - still no HDA-Intel sound card
showing even though the driver is loaded. 
On to plan B
I have started to setup an rpmbuild environment but need to read some
more instructions, as when I followed the wiki I got different results
- not sure if this is due to using the centosplus SRPM, as that is what
all my workstations use, or due to my error in following instructions.
When I tried the make oldconfig after copying the config file as
indicated I ended up having to respond to lots of option questions that
I have no idea about, thus I'm likely to select an option that causes
problems.
I thought make oldconfig was a process to dump out the current config
settings so they could be used as a template for the new
build..confused.
more reading coming my way.

  
According to comment #10 in there, Gary Gatling built a test kernel
with the above alsa patch removed. You might want to try asking him
for the kernel he built if you do not feel like building it yourself.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  
  
  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  



<>___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Audio fails on centos 5.5 sony laptop - snd-hda-intel

[Akemi Yagi]

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Rob Kampen  wrote:
> Rob Kampen wrote:

> I have started to setup an rpmbuild environment but need to read some more
> instructions, as when I followed the wiki I got different results - not sure
> if this is due to using the centosplus SRPM, as that is what all my
> workstations use, or due to my error in following instructions.
> When I tried the make oldconfig after copying the config file as indicated I
> ended up having to respond to lots of option questions that I have no idea
> about, thus I'm likely to select an option that causes problems.
> I thought make oldconfig was a process to dump out the current config
> settings so they could be used as a template for the new
> build..confused.

Because you are starting with a centosplus kernel and cplus kernels
are already customized, you do not have to go through the
customization part of the wiki instruction.  In your case, all you
have to do it to remove one patch.

I see the patch to be removed is this one:

Patch24883: linux-2.6-sound-alsa-hda-driver-update-for-rhel5-5.patch

Therefore, look for the line:

%patch24883 -p1

and delete it (it is line 9753 in the current kernel). If you had
already modified the .spec file, I suggest you start fresh. The only
other change you would want to make is "buildid" to provide a unique
name for your new kernel.

Good luck!

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] directory permissions set to 600?

[Gordon Messmer]

On 07/21/2010 08:30 AM, Ski Dawg wrote:
> OK, my question from all of this is what is the difference between
> 0600 and 0700 for a directory that is owned by root?

For a directory, there's effectively no difference because the Linux 
kernel does lax security checking for the root user.  Root will be 
allowed to read and write files, and access directory contents 
regardless of the permissions indicated on the filesystem.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Fsck on mdraid array

[Gordon Messmer]

On 07/21/2010 09:12 AM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
> So I boot from CentOS 5.3 dvd in rescue mode, do not mount the file
> systems, and try to run
>   fsck -y /dev/md0
>   fsck -y /dev/md1
>   fsck -y /dev/md2
>
> For each try I get an error message: "Superblock could not be found..."
> "The device does not seem to contain a valid ext2 filesystem..."

Perhaps they weren't started automatically?  Try running "mdadm -IRs" 
and then look at the contents of /proc/mdstat and the output of 'dmesg' 
for more information.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] redundant networked secure file system recommendation

[Christoph Maser]

Am 19.07.2010 18:02, schrieb Boris Epstein:
> Hi all,
>
> We are currently running a NFS-based server centric setup. I would
> like to set up something where I can easily have more than one
> redundant server, security/authentication (this part seems a little
> flaky with NFS, at least did several years ago), with the capability
> to easily add/remove servers as necessary, take redundant servers down
> for maintenance, etc. Total volume we expect to run on the server side
> will be somewhere between 10-30 TB. The servers will most likely be
> CentOS machines, the clients mostly Linux machines with some Macs and
> possibly Windows (the latter part not that important).
>
> Any insight, thoughts and recommendations will be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Boris.
>

I think about buying a HP LeftHand SAN wich is an iSCSI cluster sytem. 
One could use that as backend for two failover hosts serving GFS via NFS.

+C

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos