Re: [CentOS-docs] Can not to update a page ?
Am 07.08.10 18:02, schrieb gaohu: as the english version has been updated to rev19, but I find that I have no right to edit.Admins has already put me in the edit group, with the Wiki user name GaoHum, there must something wrong, could any one help ? Looks like I edited the wrong page for ACLs, it should work now. Please: If you do not get an answer right away, don't just repost here. Not everybody has time to look over these lists every day. Ralph ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda archivo samba
Cesar, complementa los consejos que has recibido de la lista con ACL's, (Listas de control de acceso), las cuales refuerzan los niveles de accesabilidad a los recursos que tengas en el servidor de archivos CentOS. Saludos. Carlos R. El 6 de agosto de 2010 17:13, César Martinez cmarti...@servicomecuador.comescribió: Muchas gracias por la aclaración ya me imaginaba que la sesión queda iniciada por eso ya no pide clave, ahora he probado en las máquinas windows y funciona bien la autenticación aquí solo me pide clave no el usuario, pero en las máquinas con windows vista o windows 7 pide el usuario pongo el usuario y clave y no funciona, la pregunta es hay que agregar algo extra en la configuración del archivo samba para que funcionen las maquinas con windows 7 o vista Gracias César El 06/08/10 15:54, e...@r Rodolfo escribió: es cierto lo q dice el amigo Rhnny, desde windows llamas al recurso compartido, te pide validacion, pones el user y el password y entras, ahi ya estas dentro, por q ese user esta validado en samba, no entiendo q estando dentro darle doble click pedir otra vez contraseña?¿, el usuario q accedio desde windows ya esta dentro, para q vuelva a pedir tiene q salir de sesion, si no seria asi, no entindo como deberia ser, aunq tal vez se peuda, pero nunca me tope con e so yo hice en centos algo parecido, pero las lineas fueron muy pocas, es mas solo modifiq uno q ya estaba de ejemplo. El 06/08/10, Rhonnyrhonny.l...@gmail.com escribió: 2010/8/6 César Martinezcmarti...@servicomecuador.com Muchas gracias te cuento que ya logre hacer que me valide la clave es decir ya entra, ahora cuando vuelvo a dar doble click sobre el recurso compartido ya no me pide la clave, hay alguna forma de hacer que siempre pida la clave al recurso compartido?? Gracias La única manera (que yo conozco) es cerrando y volviendo abrir la sesión de usuario del cliente windows, ya que esa conexión queda registrada durante la sesión. El 06/08/10 11:24, Rhonny escribió: Buenas, 2010/8/6 César Martinezcmarti...@servicomecuador.com Hola amigos esperando que se encuentren bien acudo a ustedes a ver si me pueden hechar una ayuda con este problema. Estoy usando samba para compartir archivos en linux, es decir una máquina hace de servidor esta máquina es un centos, actualmente tengo una carpeta compartida la cuál funciona muy bien usarios entran y salen copian archivos de esa carpeta sin problemas. Ahora me han pedido que coloque dentro del mismo servidor otra carpeta que sea privada es decir que solo usuarios registrados puedan acceder a esa carpeta. Cree otras líneas de código en mi archivo smb.conf, aparece ya la carpeta privada y pública, pero trato de acceder a la carpeta privada me pide la clave coloco la misma pero no funciona lo que he hecho es lo siguiente 1.- adduser pruebas 2.- mbpasswd -a pruebas 3.- vi /etc/samba/smbusers 4.- en el archivo smbuserrs agrego al linea con al cual doy acceso al usuario que acabo de crear asi pruebas = pruebas Esto es loq ue tengo en mi archivo smb.conf log file = /var/log/samba/log.%U name resolve order = wins hosts bcast announce version = 5.2 domain master = yes wins proxy = yes wins support = true dns proxy = yes netbios name = cesar max wins ttl = 518400 server string = fedora max ttl = 86400 local master = yes workgroup = SERVICOM os level = 100 debug level = 2 announce as = nt min wins ttl = 21600 max log size = 50 security = share username map = /etc/samba/smbusers [para todos] writeable = yes delete readonly = yes browseable = yes public = yes security = share guest ok = Yes path = /var/samba/datos [privado] writeable = yes delete readonly = yes browseable = yes security = share admin users= pruebas path = /var/samba/privado Gracias a todos ___ En el recurso [privado] quita la opción security = share y agrega valid users = usuario1, usuario2 ... Tienes otras opciones como: force user = force group = read list = write list = Debes tener en cuenta que por lo menos las dos ultimas no funcionan si en la sección Global tienes security = share La info detallada de las opciones están en el man 5 smb.conf http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/manpages-3/smb.conf.5.html Espero te sirva, nos cuentas como te fue. ___ CentOS-es mailing list centos...@centos.orghttp://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es --
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where they are visibletosystem(VBOX driver install)
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 19:06 -0400, MGW-Discussions wrote: Thanks for the reply. How do I verify where the sources should be after the rpm install? How do I install only the headers, since that phrase keeps popping up but like many things on the net, no one ever actually verifies the process for making sure you have them installed, nor how to do it in the first place? rpm -qa | grep kernel Here is the listing of kernel release and available rpms where I downloaded them. [sysad...@comcserver1 tmp]$ uname -r 2.6.18-194.el5 [sysad...@comcserver1 tmp]$ ls |grep kernel |grep 2.6.18-194.el kernel-2.6.18-194.el5.src.rpm Look here that is *NOT* what you need! I'm listing all of them to make sure you are up to date...of which you are not... yum update kernel kernel-headers kernel-devel Reboot the Machine to make sure your on the newest kernel. Now for VirtualBox Run This to Compile the driver as root: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup Now your done... John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Stuttering sound
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 20:39 -0300, Eduardo Grosclaude wrote: Dear List, After some googling around without any results, I'm quite puzzled. Since some past update I can't precise, kernel 2.6.164 works fine, however 2.6.194 has some sound problem in my somewhat old and beaten Toshiba laptop. --- Maybe give this a whirl... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586532 Comment 22 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where theyare visibletosystem(VBOXdriver install)
JohnS wrote: rpm -qa | grep kernel Look here that is *NOT* what you need! I'm listing all of them to make sure you are up to date...of which you are not... yum update kernel kernel-headers kernel-devel Reboot the Machine to make sure your on the newest kernel. Now for VirtualBox Run This to Compile the driver as root: /etc/init.d/vboxdrv setup Now your done... John As I have already indicated, the process is not as seamless as everyone seems to think it is from a basic upgraded virtualbox. Thanks for the rpm clue, however, I evidently already have the headers installed and the setup command still fails. I need to know what to set KERN_DIR to since that much be the piece that is breaking the process. Here is the result of running the commands that you listed previously: [sysad...@comcserver1 tmp]$ sudo rpm -qa | grep kernel kernel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 kernel-devel-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 kernel-headers-2.6.18-194.8.1.el5 kernel-2.6.18-194.el5 [sysad...@comcserver1 tmp]$ sudo yum update kernel kernel-headers kernel-devel Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirrors.finalasp.com * base: centos.mirror.netriplex.com * extras: mirror.vcu.edu * rpmforge: apt.sw.be * updates: mirror.anl.gov Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update So if the installed kernel is not a properly updated kernel, then why does it not wish to further upgrade? Here is repolist: sudo yum repolist Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * addons: mirrors.finalasp.com * base: dist1.800hosting.com * extras: mirror.vcu.edu * rpmforge: apt.sw.be * updates: mirror.anl.gov repo id repo name status addons CentOS-5 - Addons enabled: 0 base CentOS-5 - Base enabled: 2,599 extras CentOS-5 - Extras enabled:333 pidgin Pidgin for RHEL/CentOS 5 - i386 enabled:266 rpmforge Red Hat Enterprise 5 - RPMforge.net - dag enabled: 10,344 updates CentOS-5 - Updates enabled:416 virtualbox RHEL/CentOS-5 / i386 - VirtualBox enabled: 9 repolist: 13,967 I have restarted a second time, after removing the virtualization group, and the module compile worked. However, I am still unclear as to why the kernel-headers were installed and it was not detecting them. Also, how would I have resolved this issue of invisible sources and headers if it had not just magically started working. I also read just now, how the xen kernel, as installed with Virtualization, will not work well with VBox so maybe that was it, however, how would that cause the setup script not to see the installed sources and headers? Do I need to restart the system when the headers and sources are installed? Even though it is now working, I am still unclear why it wasn't, and why it is now resolved. -- Respectfully, Martes G Wigglesworth M. G. Wigglesworth Holdings, LLC www.mgwigglesworth.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.5 : Installing Sources where theyare visibletosystem(VBOXdriver install)
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:01 AM, MGW-Discussions mailinglistmem...@mgwigglesworth.net wrote: Do I need to restart the system when the headers and sources are installed? That is generally a good idea since the kernel, headers and devel rpms are installed all at the same time. Otherwise you won't be running the newly installed kernel as well. HTH... Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the past). when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something and i'll have my contact look into it: if people *initially* install 5.3, is it standard behaviour to still regularly upgrade as new releases come out? obviously, i have to ask my contact to verify what the client has been doing all this time but, in general, what's the normal behaviour for people running centos/rhel? and is there a way to examine an install to see how updated it's been since that original installation? i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Top-notch, inexpensive online Linux/OSS/kernel courses http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: : when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something and i'll have my contact look into it: if people *initially* install 5.3, is it standard behaviour to still regularly upgrade as new releases come out? Terminology: generally an upgrade refers to moving from one major release to another, whereas an update is moving forward to the newest sub-release. I.e., CentOS 5.5 - CentOS 6.0 will be an upgrade (and not recommended as an upgrade per se), whereas CentOS 5.3 - CentOS 5.5 is an update. obviously, i have to ask my contact to verify what the client has been doing all this time but, in general, what's the normal behaviour for people running centos/rhel? and is there a way to examine an install to see how updated it's been since that original installation? Check /etc/redhat-release; also uname -a if you know which kernel to look for. i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. They're both CentOS 5. The differences are mainly (but not exclusively) in security enhancements, upgrades to applications (like Firefox or OO) and the like. I would check to be sure if you think it will make that much difference (and it might - 5.3 is what, a year old now?). HTH Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable than a home box and automated via cron (cli tools a must), but encryption is important, people are snoopy and I'm paranoid about that sort of stuff. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
- Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote: Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable than a home box and automated via cron (cli tools a must), but encryption is important, people are snoopy and I'm paranoid about that sort of stuff. http://rsync.net/ I have not used them personally, but a few acquaintances have been using them for a year or two with no problems. 'It just works.' --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Michael A. Peters spake: Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable than a home box and automated via cron (cli tools a must), but encryption is important, people are snoopy and I'm paranoid about that sort of stuff. I'd like to recommend duplicity. I have it running at my employers site for multiple customers with each one backup up data in the TiByte+ range. Works like a charm. http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1003#head-95339dd68454e3625bedea8ee587fdf5ee092b28 HTH, Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFMXtviO/2mgkVVV7kRAgYLAJ43sURB6GZ6SGEDUDzqlYGClUqkvQCdFauX 39nKjY4ghFSpEUrpvmvErJM= =eveX -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
Michael A. Peters writes: Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable than a home box and automated via cron (cli tools a must), but encryption is important, people are snoopy and I'm paranoid about that sort of stuff. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I am also looking for encrypted remote backups, been searching the internetz for a while. The only service worth considering so far (imho) is Colin Percival's tarsnap (www.tasnap.com). Let me know which solution you choose, I'm interested. -- Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
At Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:11:35 -0400 (EDT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: more a terminology usage question than anything else, but in a couple of weeks, i'll be teaching the first of a few sessions on RHEL admin and, unsurprisingly, i'll be using centos (as i've done in the past). when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something and i'll have my contact look into it: if people *initially* install 5.3, is it standard behaviour to still regularly upgrade as new releases come out? Depends. Most people do update as new updates come out. Doing 'yum update' regularly will update to newer point releases automagically. Some people (for various reasons) don't regularly update their systems. Look in /etc/issue obviously, i have to ask my contact to verify what the client has been doing all this time but, in general, what's the normal behaviour for people running centos/rhel? and is there a way to examine an install to see how updated it's been since that original installation? i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general admin POV -- it does not really make sense to go into a certain level of detail (like specific version numbers). Basic functionallity is not going to change from point version to point version. rday -- Robert Heller -- Get the Deepwoods Software FireFox Toolbar! Deepwoods Software-- Linux Installation and Administration http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Web Hosting, with CGI and Database hel...@deepsoft.com -- Contract Programming: C/C++, Tcl/Tk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general admin POV -- it does not really make sense to go into a certain level of detail (like specific version numbers). Basic functionallity is not going to change from point version to point version. There is a limited amount of truth to this - but it depends on the topic being taught. Redhat usually adds functionality to the point releases as they go - a few examples in the current 5.X release cycle being KVM virtualisation, postgres-8.4 and the ext4 filesystem. The X part of 5.X refers to a point in time of Redhat... but that really is a point in time and in terms of maintaining a system there is only RHEL5... there really is no point installing 5.3 when you should keep up to date on updates and particularly depending on the topic to be taught as well. James ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:18:58AM -0700, Mark wrote: Check /etc/redhat-release; also uname -a if you know which kernel to look for. Actually, a combination of uname -a for kernel rev and then rpm -q centos-release is a more much sane and accurate method to identify which CentOS release is in use. John -- Another age must be the judge. -- Charles Babbage, realizing the technology did not exist to construct his difference engine, 1837; a full-size implementation exists at the Mountain View, CA Computer History Museum (CHM), where this quote is displayed. The same can be said of the PLATO computer project, which was celebrated in the pl...@50 conference at the CHM, 2-3 June 2010 pgpld2UyoXSk5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:29:48PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: Depends. Most people do update as new updates come out. Doing 'yum update' regularly will update to newer point releases automagically. Some people (for various reasons) don't regularly update their systems. Look in /etc/issue Why? That file bears no relation to system identification purposes. uname -a followed by rpm -q centos-release will properly identify a system release level. John -- Much of what looks like rudeness in hacker circles is not intended to give offence. Rather, it's the product of the direct, cut-through-the-bullshit communications style that is natural to people who are more concerned about solving problems than making others feel warm and fuzzy. http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html pgpAXs9unuaFI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something and i'll have my contact look into it: if people *initially* install 5.3, is it standard behaviour to still regularly upgrade as new releases come out? sadly, I find far too many people who installed RHEL x.y, but don't have an RHN subscription so they NEVER UPDATE THE SYSTEM. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running5.3?
May be. cat /etc/redhat-release is the easy way Greets Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Claro. -Original Message- From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 12:56:33 To: Robert Hellerhel...@deepsoft.com Reply-To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Cc: CentOS mailing listcentos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
Greetings, On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote: Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable than a home box and automated via cron (cli tools a must), but encryption is important, people are snoopy and I'm paranoid about that sort of stuff. Dunno how http://nongnu.org/rdiff-backup/ will work for you. Comments solicited from esteemed members. Of course Amanda, Bacula are there in the conventional DR model. Never had an opportunity/resources to try it though. But all the same, looks impressive: http://www.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup/examples.html Regards Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Encrypted remote backup?
Greetings, On 8/8/10, Michael A. Peters mpet...@mac.com wrote: Better news still, It seems centos rpms are available for x86(32/64 bits) and ppc arch at (hopefully) at an yum repository http://packages.sw.be/rdiff-backup/ Again, I have never touched it... Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get support from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so you can still get updates? Ah well... Sent from Android Mobile On 8 Aug 2010 18:58, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 08/08/10 9:11 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: when i asked the organizer to identify the specific version of RHEL that was being used at the client site, i was told 5.3 so i can easily install 5.3 on the classroom machines, but i'm curious about something and i'll have my contact look into it: if people *initially* install 5.3, is it standard behaviour to still regularly upgrade as new releases come out? sadly, I find far too many people who installed RHEL x.y, but don't have an RHN subscription so they NEVER UPDATE THE SYSTEM. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
On 08/08/10 1:12 PM, James Hogarth wrote: I do find this behaviour very odd... if you are not intending to get support from redhat why not just install CentOS in the beginning so you can still get updates? Ah well... fairly often, its due to some perceived vendor requirements on the part of operations people. Or, the server was purchased with a RHEL license, but it wasn't renewed. I have to work with operations people in overseas manufacturing plants, who are _extremely_ conservative about applying updates. if its not broken, they won't fix it. as most of these systems are single function (run a java based application suite used for factory floor message routing, or run an oracle/postgres/whatever database along with some java stuff that front ends for the database), most updates have nothing to do with the mission. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! Audacity should be able to handle that I believe. Rpmforge carries it. John -- When there are too many policemen, there can be no liberty. When there are too many soldiers, there can be no peace. When there are too many lawyers, there can be no justice. -- Lin Yutang (10 October 1895 - 26 March 1976), Chinese writer and translator, as quoted in Alexander, James (2005). The World's Funniest Laws. Cheam: Crombie Jardine. pp. page 6 pgplVim5rWVE9.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
Lanny Marcus writes: I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ffmpeg should be able to help here. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Lanny Marcus writes: I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! ffmpeg should be able to help here. No offense to ffmpeg fans, but I'd go with Audacity - it's a first class GUI sound editor. Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
On Sun, 8 Aug 2010, John R. Dennison wrote: To: Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com From: John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 04:29:41PM -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote: I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! Audacity should be able to handle that I believe. Rpmforge carries it. Yes, I can second that. Just load the mp3 file into audacity, select the part to cut, then save the remaining part of the file to a different name. Keith - Websites: http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.karsites.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] fail2ban behavior
I created a filter and verified it with fail2ban-regex against actual lines in my log and it works. During restarts of fail2ban, only some previous ip's get banned immediately whereas some need a reoccurrence despite the jail's config specification of maxretry and findtime suggesting the entries mandate blocking. I'd assume the behavior after a restart is noe way if it weren't for the seemingly random immediate notification of blocks being different? Anyone with experience using fail2ban know anything about this? Thanks, jlc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Package to truncate .mp3 file
ditto. I second that motion. Peace, Allan Mark wrote: On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:46 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Lanny Marcus writes: I have a 2.9 MB MP3 file. Would like to use about the first 10%, to embed sound on a web page. The Packages I have in Applications Sound Video don't seem to be able to edit the file like that. Is there a Package I can get from a Yum Repository that will do that? Using CentOS 5.5 (32 bit). TIA! ffmpeg should be able to help here. No offense to ffmpeg fans, but I'd go with Audacity - it's a first class GUI sound editor. Mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what people really mean when they say they're running 5.3?
Unless the curriculum covers updates. Peace, Allan James Hogarth wrote: i just don't want to teach off of 5.3, only to find out later that they've been keeping up to date and 5.5 would have been a more appropriate choice. thanks for any tips. On a certain level there really isn't much difference from a general admin POV -- it does not really make sense to go into a certain level of detail (like specific version numbers). Basic functionallity is not going to change from point version to point version. There is a limited amount of truth to this - but it depends on the topic being taught. Redhat usually adds functionality to the point releases as they go - a few examples in the current 5.X release cycle being KVM virtualisation, postgres-8.4 and the ext4 filesystem. The X part of 5.X refers to a point in time of Redhat... but that really is a point in time and in terms of maintaining a system there is only RHEL5... there really is no point installing 5.3 when you should keep up to date on updates and particularly depending on the topic to be taught as well. James ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] iocharset, codepage issue in CentOS 5.5
Hi Alexander (2010/08/07 17:13), Alexander Stepanovitch Pyatkin wrote: It looks like that the iocharset=cp1251,codepage=866 is not working in Some mount option are changed in centos5 by noticed in blog/wiki. CentOS4(kernel2.6.9 ) mount iocharset=yyy,codepage=xxx CentOS5(kernel2.6.18) mount utf8 kernel2.6.32 mount utf8=1 If you mount (local coded)windows-partition with utf8, file name code changing mechanism automatically work with between local-code and utf8. After remounting /windows partitions in WindowsOS, file names are described in your local code. Tsuyoshi. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] dhcp server
Hi all,
this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me.
I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final).
# yum list| grep -i dhcp
dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcpv6-client.x86_641.0.10-18.el5 installed
after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on the subnet
(192.168.100.0/24) tells me, that there is no dhcp server available.
# /etc/init.d/dhcpd configtest
Syntax: OK
[/var/log/messages]
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server
V3.0.5-RedHat
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems
Consortium.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: All rights reserved.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: For info, please visit
http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Wrote 0 leases to leases file.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Listening on
LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on
LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net
this is my /etc/dhcpd.conf
# cat /etc/dhcpd.conf
authoritative;
ddns-update-style interim;
subnet 192.168.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.100.11;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option domain-name mydomain.local;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.100.2;
option time-offset -18000; # Eastern Standard Time
range 192.168.100.150 192.168.100.199;
}
what do I'm missing? or is there a config mismatch?
many thanks
Richard
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dhcp server
2010/8/9 Richard Gliebe richard.gli...@fhv.at:
Hi all,
this is my first post on this list, hope someone can help me.
I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final).
# yum list| grep -i dhcp
dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed
dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed
after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on the subnet
(192.168.100.0/24) tells me, that there is no dhcp server available.
# /etc/init.d/dhcpd configtest
Syntax: OK
[/var/log/messages]
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server
V3.0.5-RedHat
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems
Consortium.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: All rights reserved.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: For info, please visit
http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Wrote 0 leases to leases file.
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Listening on
LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on
LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24
Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net
this is my /etc/dhcpd.conf
# cat /etc/dhcpd.conf
authoritative;
ddns-update-style interim;
subnet 192.168.100.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.100.11;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option domain-name mydomain.local;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.100.2;
option time-offset -18000; # Eastern Standard Time
range 192.168.100.150 192.168.100.199;
}
what do I'm missing? or is there a config mismatch?
it is working on any other os?
is the dhcp binded to correct interface?
--
Eero,
RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dhcp server
I have to run a dhcp server on CentOS release 5.5 (Final). # yum list| grep -i dhcp dhcp.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcp-devel.x86_64 12:3.0.5-23.el5 installed dhcpv6-client.x86_64 1.0.10-18.el5 installed after starting the dhcpd daemon, the windows Clients on the subnet (192.168.100.0/24) tells me, that there is no dhcp server available. # /etc/init.d/dhcpd configtest Syntax: OK [/var/log/messages] Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Server V3.0.5-RedHat Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems Consortium. Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: All rights reserved. Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: For info, please visit http://www.isc.org/sw/dhcp/ Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Wrote 0 leases to leases file. Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Listening on LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24 Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on LPF/eth0/00:1a:64:b6:1d:1c/192.168.100/24 Aug 9 07:11:14 tfelx01 dhcpd: Sending on Socket/fallback/fallback-net snip How about firewalling ... does your firewall allow for a DHCP server? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Moving users from Debian-based distro to CentOS
I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000. Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I had considered just creating four new users starting from UID 500 then chown -R -ing the user's home directories, but I find that invasive and possibly error prone (maybe there are files that are not owned by them). All advice appreciated. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Moving users from Debian-based distro to CentOS
On 08/08/10 10:47 PM, Dotan Cohen wrote: I have a Debian machine with four users that I plan on migrating to CentOS. As per Debian habits the UIDs start with 1000. Is it enough to reuse the Debian /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd files over? Or will I need to configure some other things? I had considered just creating four new users starting from UID 500 then chown -R -ing the user's home directories, but I find that invasive and possibly error prone (maybe there are files that are not owned by them). All advice appreciated. Thanks. I'd compare the passwd files, noting the predefined system accounts. when I copy over /etc/passwd entries, I generally cut/paste them, not just copy the whole file. of course, the same entries for /etc/shadow ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
