Re: [CentOS-virt] (no subject)
On 08/17/2011 05:10 PM, Wendy William wrote: http://www.kiyamato.com/irewin/catalog/images/work.php?html115 hi all moderator, is possibile remove the address kotakompu...@yahoo.com from the list? thanks in advance ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] (no subject)
is possibile remove the address kotakompu...@yahoo.com from the list? thanks in advance I've already complained to the ISP responsible for the IP address. inetnum:79.116.96.0 - 79.116.127.255 role: Romania Data Systems NOC address:71-75 Dr. Staicovici address:Bucharest / ROMANIA -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-es] Repositorio PowerStack para CentOS
Hola troxlinux! cuanto tiempo :) troxlinux xserverli...@gmail.com ha escrito: Señores algo pasa cuando quiere usar el repo de PowerStack (..) WARNING! You should run mysql_upgrade after a MySQL update En el log que envías todo parece correcto, una instalación/actualización a MySQL 5.5.14. Lo que te muestra es un warning indicando que no ha podido ejecutar el script mysql_upgrade para actualizar el esquema de la base de datos.. pero no debes preocuparte por ello. Esto se debe a que o bien no tenías configurado el usuario/contraseña de un usuario administrador de MySQL en /root/.my.cnf o bien el servidor no estaba arrancado. Tal y como te indica el aviso puedes ejecutarlo manualmente con: # mysql_upgrade -u usuario -p contraseña Gracias por este tipo de avisos, cualquier otra duda me avisas! :) Saludos, -- Santi Saez http://woop.es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] COPIAR EN FORMA REMOTA
On 16/08/11 23:33, Fernando Rojas wrote: No tengo a la mano una computadora para verificarlo, más recuerdo que había una función en webmin que podría funcionar para sincronizar archivos entre muchas computadoras. Mañana en la oficina lo verifico Raul Arboledaraularbol...@une.net.co wrote: No entiendo tu pregunta, disculpa, puedes ser mas explicito, en lo que necesitas a ver como te ayudamos. Un Saludo Raúl Eduardo Arboleda Zapata Ingeniero de Sistemas Unninca Cel +573 300 620 66 13 +573 312 288 90 86 Medellín, Antioquia Colombia, S.A. -Mensaje original- De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de Fernando Rojas Enviado el: Martes, 16 de Agosto de 2011 10:40 p.m. Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] COPIAR EN FORMA REMOTA Webmin no tiene opción para hacer algocómo eso? Raul Eduardo Arboleda Zapataraularbol...@une.net.co wrote: Mira hay dos cosas a tener en cuenta, lo primero es una copia y ya. puedes usar la instruccion scp -rparchivo o direcororio usuario@ip_remota:/directorio destino en maq_remota Al darle enter te preguntara la clave de servidor remoto. O el otro escenario es la copia es repetitiva pero no quires intervenir y progamarlo en un shell el comado es el mismo pero antes tienes que generar equivalencia de servidores y que no te pregunte contraseña te dejo una url para que lo programas. http://www.userlinux.net/342_ssh_sin_password.html Saludos Raúl Eduardo Arboleda Zapata Ingeniero de Sistemas UNINNCA Telefonos Celulares 3122889086 - 3006206613 Medellin, antioquia Colombia, S.A. - Mensaje original - De: Diego Sanchezdieg...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviados: Martes, 16 de Agosto 2011 20:30:57 Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] COPIAR EN FORMA REMOTA Lo mas facil, seria configurar samba.. La otra, es utilizar : en un txt pones las direcciones ip de los equipos desde la $hell : for i in $(cat archivo); do $(scp archivo* root@$i:/CARPETA); done No recuerdo si scp permite especificar la clave como parametro o en un archivo externo. Si no, vas a tener que tipearla a mano... Tal vez haya otra forma, pero y El día 16 de agosto de 2011 21:29, Carlos Alberto Jara Alva fbja...@hotmail.com escribió: Saludos comunidad... como podria hacer para copiar usando scp a varios IP, se que para copiar de una PC a otra uso scp archivo* root@IP_PC_A_COPIAR:/CARPETA Pero si quisiera copiar no a 1 sino a 10, 15 o 20 PC a la misma carpeta que ellos tienen?? Gracias ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Diego - Yo no soy paranoico! (pero que me siguen, me siguen) http://about.me/diegors/bio El que usa una firma mas larga que el mail que envia, se la come ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Ya está... Cluster Copy Files, en webmin. Ahí se permite incluso programar crons para copias múltiples ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] apache me duplico 268 proceso iguales
estos son los procesos que estan duplicados. obody 11967 0.0 0.2 11200 4248 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 11996 0.0 0.2 11200 4184 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12008 0.0 0.2 11204 4464 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12053 0.0 0.2 11204 4400 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12180 0.0 0.2 11204 4488 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12299 0.0 0.2 11204 4476 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12426 0.0 0.2 11204 4376 ?S13:17 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12451 0.0 0.3 11204 4508 ?S13:18 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL nobody 12479 0.0 0.2 11204 4336 ?S13:18 0:00 /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd -k start -DSSL 268 lineas de estas, yo creia que me estaban doseando pero al parecer me doseo yo solo por tantos procesos. esto me paso desde que instale el mod_evasive para ataques antidos alguna solucion se las agradeceria mucho de antemano un saludo y gracias. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights
OpenIndiana has all that builtin... /me ducks. - Original Message - From: John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:03 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights On 08/16/11 12:59 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: ie. you need a daemon/tool that monitors status of disks, and keeps the Linux disk- ses slot mapping up-to-date. i'm amazed this doesn't exist. isn't this a really common problem with storage arrays? -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SAS storage arrays, C6, and SES lights
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Christopher Chan christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk wrote: OpenIndiana has all that builtin... /me ducks. - Original Message - Yes, and so does many commercial NAS appliances that run on Linux - but do you think they'll tell us how they got it working? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cr repository when running your own mirror
Karanbir Singh wrote on Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:21:06 +0100: You wont need to remove anything. As long as you do not edit that file it will be managed by centos-release-5-7 and centos-release-cr-5-7 etc. Well, surely those people using their own mirrors will have to do something ... Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up
From: Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com However, I can't wrap my brain around the new NetworkManager to get it to configure the eth0 interface to obtain an IP address from our DHCP server. I've seen the FAQ on the wiki and the interface is up, but it doesn't get an IP address. I've done the installation from DVD multiple times now, each time with the same result. What am i missing? Unless I am mistaken (only tried one manual install some time ago), I kind of remember the need to check an activate at boot box in the network properties at setup time... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 我确定我的 centos6 安装界面没有中文支持
Am Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:45:05 +0200 schrieb Stephen Cox stephencoxm...@gmail.com: 只有英文请 (English only please) It translates nicely via translate.google.com The OP should have done that, of course. I haven't done a GUI install of CentOS or RedHat for years - and I'm not planning one either. He complains that the language-selection dialog does not show some sort of Chinese as option (CentOS5 apparently did). Is that correct? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos Gotcha: YUM Groupinstall
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of David Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 9:21 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos Gotcha: YUM Groupinstall At 07:13 PM 8/16/2011, you wrote: At Tue, 16 Aug 2011 18:32:43 -0700 CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Folks I have encountered a situation with YUM that isn't what I expected. Let's suppose I want to install a group, call it G. My first question would be -- is the group already installed. Realize all of this is scripted. So, I use yum groupinfo and I see the list of installed groups, and those not yet installed. If group G is in the list of installed groups, one would think that there's no point in issuing a groupinstall. But, to my surprise, a group can be listed as installed, only to find that a groupinstall will actually do a lot of installs. So, I had to adapt my script to perform a groupinfo G, parse the modules, and individually test them to see if they need installation. I do not understand this behavior -- group G is shown as installed, but it really isn't. I think what is happening is that some sub-set of group G, probably to satisfy various dependcies for rpms in group A, B and F (say). Elements of Group G have been installed, but not ALL of group G has been installed, and thus group G is *partitically* installed. In a sense group G is neither uninstalled nor fully installed. This 'group' business is not 'atomic' as are individual rpms are 'atomic': a single rpm package is either installed or not installed -- you cannot properly install 'part' of an rpm, but you can install 'part' of a group [of rpms]. Robert Yes, I sort of came to the same conclusion, but couldn't express it as elegantly as you did. Luckily, about 30 lines of Perl took care of it, by converting the module list from groupinfo into individual items which I could match against the yum list installed Another thing to consider is that individual RPMs within a group have different membership types. RPMs can have a type of default, optional, mandatory, or conditional. I don't know if a group is considered installed if only one RPM is installed, or if all of the mandatory RPMs are installed. When you run yum groupinstall, it looks to me like you get mandatory and default packages, but not optional. -Owen ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 我确定我的 centos6 安装界面没有中文支持
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 13:07 +0200, Rainer Duffner wrote: He complains that the language-selection dialog does not show some sort of Chinese as option (CentOS5 apparently did). His examples, not shown but available as http://www.williamlong.info/upload/1912_11.jpg, refers to Centos 5.3 -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x1b9e740 Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x1b9e, offset 0x740, grain 0, syndrome 0x1cc8, row 2, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 15 20:37:10 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x1098d00 Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x1098, offset 0xd00, grain 0, syndrome 0x976f, row 2, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 15 23:33:41 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 16 02:56:30 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 1 Aug 16 02:56:30 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 16 02:56:30 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC1: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x80bd9cc00 Aug 16 02:56:30 saturn kernel: EDAC MC1: CE page 0x80bd9c, offset 0xc00, grain 0, syndrome 0xe08f, row 3, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 16 02:56:30 saturn kernel: EDAC MC1: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 17 02:17:02 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 17 02:17:02 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 17 02:17:02 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x1e25fd0 Aug 17 02:17:02 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x1e25, offset 0xfd0, grain 0, syndrome 0x1cc8, row 2, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 17 02:17:02 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 17 02:41:22 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 1 Aug 17 02:41:22 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 17 02:41:22 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC1: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x80d2ce600 Aug 17 02:41:22 saturn kernel: EDAC MC1: CE page 0x80d2ce, offset 0x600, grain 0, syndrome 0xe08f, row 3, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 17 02:41:22 saturn kernel: EDAC MC1: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow Aug 17 04:07:16 saturn kernel: Northbridge Error, node 0 Aug 17 04:07:16 saturn kernel: ECC/ChipKill ECC error. Aug 17 04:07:16 saturn kernel: EDAC amd64 MC0: CE ERROR_ADDRESS= 0x41fe79200 Aug 17 04:07:16 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE page 0x41fe79, offset 0x200, grain 0, syndrome 0xa612, row 3, channel 0, label : amd64_edac Aug 17 04:07:16 saturn kernel: EDAC MC0: CE - no information available: amd64_edacError Overflow ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
From: Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. Any led on the motherboard (even better if next to a RAM slot)? Usually, the best (if you can) is to swap RAM modules. If the error follows the RAM module; it is a module problem. If the error stays at the same position, it is the motherboard. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
Thank you john, I surely hope that shifting RAM around would fix the issue...this board is extremely expensive to change...about 2K the board along. John Doe jd...@yahoo.com 8/17/2011 8:54 AM From: Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. Any led on the motherboard (even better if next to a RAM slot)? Usually, the best (if you can) is to swap RAM modules. If the error follows the RAM module; it is a module problem. If the error stays at the same position, it is the motherboard. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:17:58 -0400, Lisandro Grullon wrote: Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Hi, Please tell us more about your system. (lspci, dmesg and cat /proc/mtrr) Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
Sure morten, lspci reflects the following: 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RD890 Northbridge only dual slot (2x16) PCI-e GFX Hydra part (rev 02) 00:04.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RD890 PCI to PCI bridge (PCI express gpp port D) 00:09.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RD890 PCI to PCI bridge (PCI express gpp port H) 00:0b.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RD890 PCI to PCI bridge (NB-SB link) 00:11.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA Controller [IDE mode] 00:12.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:12.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:12.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller 00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI0 Controller 00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0 USB OHCI1 Controller 00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB EHCI Controller 00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 3d) 00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 IDE Controller 00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 LPC host controller 00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge 00:14.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 USB OHCI2 Controller 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor HyperTransport Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Miscellaneous Control 00:18.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control 00:19.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor HyperTransport Configuration 00:19.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Address Map 00:19.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor DRAM Controller 00:19.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Miscellaneous Control 00:19.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control 00:1a.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor HyperTransport Configuration 00:1a.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Address Map 00:1a.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor DRAM Controller 00:1a.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Miscellaneous Control 00:1a.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control 00:1b.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor HyperTransport Configuration 00:1b.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Address Map 00:1b.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor DRAM Controller 00:1b.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Miscellaneous Control 00:1b.4 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Family 10h Processor Link Control 01:09.0 VGA compatible controller: ASPEED Technology, Inc. ASPEED Graphics Family (rev 10) 02:00.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID SAS 2108 [Liberator] (rev 05) 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82574L Gigabit Network Connection 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01) 04:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82576 Gigabit Network Connection (rev 01) Morten Stevens mstev...@imt-systems.com 8/17/2011 9:11 AM On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 08:17:58 -0400, Lisandro Grullon wrote: Dear CentOS community, Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. I am getting the following error via stdout and also in /var/log/messages Hi, Please tell us more about your system. (lspci, dmesg and cat /proc/mtrr) Best regards, Morten ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up
On Aug 16, 2011, at 18:37, Tom H wrote: If you mean after the install, what's the output of chkconfig --list NetworkManager, chkconfig --list network, and your NIC's ifcfg-X? I ended up re-installing the system from DVD this morning (don't have my kickstart server set up yet), and this time I noticed a Configure Network button in one of the screens. It was there that I enabled a setting to start the network on boot, and now it's working out of the box. I can't stop to wonder why upstream decided to make this optional. Who doesn't want their network up, especially because it's not obvious how to start it once you are logged in? But the story doesn't stop there. When I enabled the network during the installation, the connection name was System eth0. When I logged in (as root, because this is just a test system and I hadn't configured local or network accounts yet), the network was running but using a connection named Wired connection 1 and I had two ifcfg-X files: # cat network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=bc:30:5b:e7:a7:1c NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no PEERDNS=yes IPV6INIT=no #cat network-scripts/ifcfg-Wired_connection_1 HWADDR=BC:30:5B:E7:A7:1C TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes PEERDNS=yes PEERROUTES=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME=Wired connection 1 UUID=44c68048-52ba-4e5e-807f-adf8a881552f ONBOOT=yes LAST_CONNECT=1313586374 Why on earth would NM create another config file for the same interface? Also, how do I tell NM to include the DHCP_HOSTNAME variable in the config file so that my DHCP server creates a DNS entry? I think I don't like the NM overhead in CentOS 6. Is it just a matter of doing a chkconfig --del NetworkManager to get rid off it? I'll be working on getting the CentOS 6 installation automated via kickstart later this week and hope to resolve all these issues before then. Thanks for all the help/pointers, Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up
Alfred, I would not delete network manager, it would be better if you stop it service NetworkManager stop and disable from booting chkconfig NetworkManager offit can turn a useful tool for troubleshooting in the future. In a second note about the multi-NIC, i would focus in the actual card that have the connectionshere at work we have system with 8 NIC for redundant links, but my main focus is in the actual ports that have connectivity. Take a look at /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts.focus in the ifcfg-ethx that is actually working in your box. Don't forget that you can always use system-config-network-tui as an alternative to using the GUI, as long as you have it install yum install system-config-network-tui -y.I think you are in the right path, let us know how it turn out. In reference to the host name, take a look at the file /etc/sysconfig/network and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg_ethx to assign host name informationI hope I didn't confuse you morethe Redhat documentation is rocksolid, take a glance at it. Best of luck to you. Alfred von Campe alf...@von-campe.com 8/17/2011 9:50 AM On Aug 16, 2011, at 18:37, Tom H wrote: If you mean after the install, what's the output of chkconfig --list NetworkManager, chkconfig --list network, and your NIC's ifcfg-X? I ended up re-installing the system from DVD this morning (don't have my kickstart server set up yet), and this time I noticed a Configure Network button in one of the screens. It was there that I enabled a setting to start the network on boot, and now it's working out of the box. I can't stop to wonder why upstream decided to make this optional. Who doesn't want their network up, especially because it's not obvious how to start it once you are logged in? But the story doesn't stop there. When I enabled the network during the installation, the connection name was System eth0. When I logged in (as root, because this is just a test system and I hadn't configured local or network accounts yet), the network was running but using a connection named Wired connection 1 and I had two ifcfg-X files: # cat network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=bc:30:5b:e7:a7:1c NM_CONTROLLED=yes ONBOOT=no BOOTPROTO=dhcp TYPE=Ethernet USERCTL=no PEERDNS=yes IPV6INIT=no #cat network-scripts/ifcfg-Wired_connection_1 HWADDR=BC:30:5B:E7:A7:1C TYPE=Ethernet BOOTPROTO=dhcp DEFROUTE=yes PEERDNS=yes PEERROUTES=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no NAME=Wired connection 1 UUID=44c68048-52ba-4e5e-807f-adf8a881552f ONBOOT=yes LAST_CONNECT=1313586374 Why on earth would NM create another config file for the same interface? Also, how do I tell NM to include the DHCP_HOSTNAME variable in the config file so that my DHCP server creates a DNS entry? I think I don't like the NM overhead in CentOS 6. Is it just a matter of doing a chkconfig --del NetworkManager to get rid off it? I'll be working on getting the CentOS 6 installation automated via kickstart later this week and hope to resolve all these issues before then. Thanks for all the help/pointers, Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 5.1.6 php to 5.3, a few questions
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote: Alright, looks like I have to do this (centos 5.x install). Some questions.. 1) I imagine I have to uninstall my current version of php...will yum remove want to take a ton of programs with it? Would I have to individually uninstall each package instead? 2) yum down the new version from some repo and then install it. I imagine nothing from the previous setup will be there and I would have to start going through the program and config files to make it work with my system, yes? 3) for those that have done it, how many things broke when you took out the old and added the new? honestly just thinking about getting a new comp, installing centos6, adding some virtuals, moving the sites over to the new one and being done with it. Not comfortable with a version of php that will not be backported like 5.1.6 is with centos team. any problems you encountered, would love to hear about them. thanks The official php53 packages do not provide php, in the rpm dependency sense, (they use php53) so any app that requires the php dependency will not install or complain if you try to remove the original php package. This makes the official php53 packages unusable, IMO. The IUS repository provides php 5.3 rpms that do provide the correct 'php' dependency, so the apps won't have dependency issues. -☙ Brian Mathis ❧- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, John Doe wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] Strange Kernel Warning. From: Lisandro Grullon lgrul...@citytech.cuny.edu Can someone give me clues as to whether my memory is going bad or I am having problem with the actual board. Thank you in advace. Any led on the motherboard (even better if next to a RAM slot)? Usually, the best (if you can) is to swap RAM modules. If the error follows the RAM module; it is a module problem. If the error stays at the same position, it is the motherboard. Another option is to take all the memory out, and then put one module at a time back onto the motherboard, and test that with memtest86+. Should be on the install CD/DVD. Once you have identified a memory module that tests without errors, try that in each of the other slots if possible. If there are no errors in any of the other slots, then you will need to test the other memory modules in a slot you know works OK, to see if it's one of the other memory modules that is faulty. It's also possible to have high density memory and low density memory that works and tests OK individually on a motherboard. However when high density and low density modules are mixed together at the same time in a system, then you might find errors occuring. I had this on a Centos 5.5 32 bit system, and it was very frustrating to locate the cause of the error. Testing one individual memory module at a time takes the guesswork out of which module may be the faulty one. But NEVER mix HD and LD modules together, as they don't always work well together. HTH Keith Roberts - Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up
On Aug 17, 2011, at 9:58, Lisandro Grullon wrote: In a second note about the multi-NIC, i would focus in the actual card that have the connections That's my point, I only have one NIC (it's a desktop system) yet NM created two config files, one with ONBOOT=no and the other with ONBOOT=yes. I reinstalled the system yet again, and this time there was only one. I don't really like how NM affects the system; I think I'll disable it and edit the ifcfg file by hand (well, with a script). Alfred ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 08:56 -0700, John Doe wrote: but I really prefer static configurations for servers. Absolute, every time. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 78, Issue 3
-3.0.1-68.el4.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/dhcp-3.0.1-68.el4.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update dhcp dhclient Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110816/9d84e67c/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 4 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:05:50 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1160 Moderate CentOS 4 x86_64 dhcp - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20110816130550.gd9...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1160 dhcp security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1160.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/dhclient-3.0.1-68.el4.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/dhcp-3.0.1-68.el4.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/dhcp-devel-3.0.1-68.el4.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/dhcp-3.0.1-68.el4.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update dhcp dhclient Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110816/c84f39c7/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 5 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:32:01 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1167 Critical CentOS 4 i386 seamonkey - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20110816223201.ga32...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1167 seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1167.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 i386 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110817/105b677d/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 6 Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:32:29 +0200 From: Tru Huynh t...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2011:1167 Critical CentOS 4 x86_64 seamonkey - security update To: centos-annou...@centos.org Message-ID: 20110816223229.gb32...@sillage.bis.pasteur.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2011:1167 seamonkey security update for CentOS 4 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1167.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-72.el4.centos.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-4 x86_64 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20110817/3f7b2c91/attachment
Re: [CentOS] hardware isues
On 8/17/2011 9:59 AM, lists-centos wrote: Original Message Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 01:33:39 PM + From: lists-centos To: William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com Subject: Re: [CentOS] hardware isues Original Message Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 06:43:24 AM -0400 From: William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com To: lists-centos Subject: Re: [CentOS] hardware isues On 8/13/2011 9:40 PM, lists-centos wrote: Original Message Date: Saturday, August 13, 2011 09:06:51 PM -0400 From: William Warrenhescomins...@emmanuelcomputerconsulting.com I have a broadcom bcm5722 and a dual intel pro/1000 pt nic in a dell t110. The setup sees the cards and i put them into automatic mode. After the install no cards are detected at all. Astaro 8.01 detects and utilizes all of these cards just fine. I have also tried ubuntu server 10.04 lts and they work fine. I'm curious if this is a bug with Centos 6? I have a new T310 with what I suspect has the same intel dual NIC - the machine is off at the moment and the order detail just says: On-Board Dual Gigabit Network Adapter [430-2008] that I installed centos 6.0 on last week. I only configured first port and it worked fine. The install set up a stub ifcfg-eth1 which looked fine too, but I haven't configured it yet to confirm that it works as expected. - Richard how did your testing go? I've reburned and md5ed multiple times. I just cannot get cent6 to work on this machine. ubuntu 10.05lts works flawlessly. I installed centos6.0 on a second new Dell T310 yesterday with no problems. I'm doing net installs from a local repository so do the network setup at that point, assigning a static (ipv4) ipnumber. I'm given the choice of NIC, and in both cases have selected the first one. I don't touch the networking stuff after that point in the install, and it all works fine. The /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file is fully populated. The eth1 file has stub information. The card on the second machine is a Broadcom (haven't brought the first t310 back up yet to confirm its card) -- below are the details from dmesg from the last reboot. Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.0.8-j15 (Feb 15, 2010) bnx2 :02:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 bnx2 :02:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 bnx2 :02:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j15.fw bnx2 :02:00.0: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-5.0.0.j10.fw eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5716 1000Base-T (C0) PCI Express found at mem da00, IRQ 16, node addr 78:2b:cb:3d:08:98 alloc irq_desc for 17 on node -1 alloc kstat_irqs on node -1 bnx2 :02:00.1: PCI INT B - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17 bnx2 :02:00.1: setting latency timer to 64 bnx2 :02:00.1: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j15.fw bnx2 :02:00.1: firmware: requesting bnx2/bnx2-rv2p-09-5.0.0.j10.fw eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5716 1000Base-T (C0) PCI Express found at mem dc00, IRQ 17, node addr 78:2b:cb:3d:08:99 --- A couple of years ago I had trouble with a RealTek card and found that the kernel didn't have (working) firmware support for it. In that case I was able to get the necessary driver and would load it after the machine came up. The next kernel update or two had the issue fixed. I was just looking at the message on the list [CentOS] Problem getting eth0 up and it got me wondering. Are you configuring the network at any point in the install process? With previous versions I seem to remember the network configuration step as being obvious. With 6 it isn't. Because I configure eth0 as part of the net install setup I skip the Configure Network box, but it's rather subtle and easily missed if you haven't already done the network setup. - Richard First time I didn't...the subsequent times I did. I tried setting them as dhcp to no avail. I then tried static. I'll try one more time if it doesn't work i'll have to stick with ubuntu... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cr repository when running your own mirror
On 08/17/2011 09:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: You wont need to remove anything. As long as you do not edit that file it will be managed by centos-release-5-7 and centos-release-cr-5-7 etc. Well, surely those people using their own mirrors will have to do something ... Sure, but then if someone is going to hardwire urls to point at specific content, its reasonable to expect them to manage that content locally. the /cr/ repo isnt going to go away, the content from inside it will, so depending on how you rehash the baseurl, leave the $releasever tag in, and things should be fine. As long as you mirror the entire repo structure from centos.org - KB ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos 6 updates?
I haven't seen -any- updates to centos 6 since July 10th?!?is 6.1 holding this up? -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/2011 01:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Loading fine in Canada. -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially, a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. It's working from here (NL). -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- L. de Braal BraHa Systems NL - Terneuzen T +31 115 649333 F +31 115 649444 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: It's working from here (NL). and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( Thank you (Dank U wel). -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/11 10:51 AM, Always Learning wrote: Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. working fine from here in California. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. As others have said, it works fine from the US. But one of our engineers is in Spain at the moment and he's having some routing trouble to US sites. -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com wrote: On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. As others have said, it works fine from the US. But one of our engineers is in Spain at the moment and he's having some routing trouble to US sites. -- It works fine from South Africa as well. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
Works fine from Singapore. Must be your ISP thing. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/2011 06:57 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: It's working from here (NL). and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( Thank you (Dank U wel). I wouldn't be so sure, from a BT Home connection here in England it's working fine for me. -- Ping Results -- [Jake@localhost ~]$ ping centos.org PING centos.org (72.232.194.162) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=1 ttl=41 time=154 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=2 ttl=41 time=143 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=3 ttl=41 time=142 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=4 ttl=41 time=155 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=5 ttl=41 time=143 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=6 ttl=41 time=142 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=7 ttl=41 time=142 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_req=8 ttl=41 time=145 ms ^C --- centos.org ping statistics --- 8 packets transmitted, 8 received, 0% packet loss, time 7007ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 142.177/146.163/155.328/5.149 ms [Jake@localhost ~]$ ping 72.232.194.162 PING 72.232.194.162 (72.232.194.162) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 72.232.194.162: icmp_req=1 ttl=41 time=142 ms 64 bytes from 72.232.194.162: icmp_req=2 ttl=41 time=142 ms 64 bytes from 72.232.194.162: icmp_req=3 ttl=41 time=143 ms 64 bytes from 72.232.194.162: icmp_req=4 ttl=41 time=143 ms 64 bytes from 72.232.194.162: icmp_req=5 ttl=41 time=142 ms ^C --- 72.232.194.162 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4004ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 142.392/142.840/143.343/0.375 ms [Jake@localhost ~]$ -- End Ping Results -- -- Jake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Always Learning wrote: To: Centos centos@centos.org From: Always Learning cen...@u61.u22.net Subject: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Fine for me - my ISP's location is exeter,UK IIRC: [root@karsites ~]# date Wed Aug 17 19:09:45 BST 2011 [root@karsites ~]# ping centos.org PING centos.org (72.232.194.162) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=142 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=4 ttl=48 time=141 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=5 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=6 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=7 ttl=48 time=142 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=8 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=9 ttl=48 time=140 ms 64 bytes from www.centos.org (72.232.194.162): icmp_seq=10 ttl=48 time=140 ms --- centos.org ping statistics --- 10 packets transmitted, 10 received, 0% packet loss, time 9008ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 140.532/141.195/142.939/0.803 ms [root@karsites ~]# date Wed Aug 17 19:10:00 BST 2011 Kind Regards, Keith - Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Works fine from Singapore. Must be your ISP thing. Yes I guess so. I tried via Manchester with one ISP and via London with an unrelated ISP :-( -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:06 +0100, Jake Shipton wrote: I wouldn't be so sure, from a BT Home connection here in England it's working fine for me. Oh well must move to Plus Net for off-site use (they give extra IPs and are owned by BT). Tried unsuccessfully via Claranet and Talk Talk Business (formerly Nildram, Pipex, Tiscali, Opal) -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:17:38PM +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Works fine from Singapore. Must be your ISP thing. Yes I guess so. A good site to use to check that is http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/ -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Principal Snyder: It's fuzzy-minded liberal thinking like that that gets you eaten. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:54 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: It's working from here (NL). and Digimer says it works from Canada, so it must be English related :-( Thank you (Dank U wel). You're welcome (graag gedaan). -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- L. de Braal BraHa Systems NL - Terneuzen T +31 115 649333 F +31 115 649444 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
Fine here on Claranet South London UK Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 02:06 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Works fine from Singapore. Must be your ISP thing. Yes I guess so. I tried via Manchester with one ISP and via London with an unrelated ISP :-( -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:28 +0200, Leen de Braal wrote: Thank you (Dank U wel). You're welcome (graag gedaan). Ik kan ook 'dank je wel' schrijven of bedankt. Ik heb een beetje heimwee voor Nederland maar ik been toch Engels. Hopefully the defective Internet in parts of England will restore access to Centos.org soon :-) Thank you to the world-wide reports of successful access to www.centos.org -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: Fine here on Claranet South London UK I'm trying from one of their London data centres, without success. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/2011 01:53 PM Digimer wrote: On 08/17/2011 01:51 PM, Always Learning wrote: Can not http, ping or traceroute centos.org, www.centos.org or 72.232.194.162 (the IP address for both) Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Loading fine in Canada. Yet another reason to move to Canada... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:50 -0400, ken wrote: Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Loading fine in Canada. Yet another reason to move to Canada... How much are the Canadian Tourist Board paying you ;-) -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or renaming) slapd.d? Does anybody know the proper format for slapd.d entries? Thanks, -- Mitch Patenaude ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, ken wrote: Yet another reason to move to Canada... Now there's two. :-) -- Paul Heinlein heinl...@madboa.com http://www.madboa.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:41 +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: Fine here on Claranet South London UK I'm trying from one of their London data centres, without success Fine from here (Netherlands) traceroute to www.centos.org (72.232.194.162), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 ap.grote.net (192.168.100.4) 0.239 ms 0.249 ms 0.283 ms 2 lo1.dr6.d12.xs4all.net (194.109.5.213) 22.873 ms 26.838 ms 26.873 ms 3 1416.ae3.xr4.1d12.xs4all.net (194.109.7.137) 22.742 ms 22.741 ms 22.736 ms 4 asd-dc2-ias-ur10.nl.kpn.net (194.151.244.74) 26.692 ms 26.724 ms 26.691 ms 5 asd2-rou-1022.nl.eurorings.net (195.190.227.221) 26.699 ms 26.691 ms 30.444 ms 6 nyk-s1-rou-1001.US.eurorings.net (134.222.226.170) 118.541 ms 117.590 ms 117.575 ms 7 nyk-s1-rou-1021.US.eurorings.net (134.222.226.2) 113.604 ms 135.192 ms 135.168 ms 8 ahbn-s1-rou-1041.US.eurorings.net (134.222.228.10) 143.115 ms 143.108 ms 107.208 ms 9 ahbn-s1-rou-1001.US.eurorings.net (134.222.226.57) 107.201 ms ahbn-s1-rou-1001.US.eurorings.net (134.222.226.53) 111.149 ms ahbn-s1-rou-1001.US.eurorings.net (134.222.226.57) 111.142 ms 10 xe-7-1-0.edge1.Washington4.Level3.net (4.53.112.53) 111.150 ms 111.186 ms 111.160 ms 11 vlan70.csw2.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.149.126) 115.034 ms vlan80.csw3.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.149.190) 131.070 ms 131.042 ms 12 ae-91-91.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.141) 134.965 ms 134.937 ms ae-61-61.ebr1.Washington1.Level3.net (4.69.134.129) 107.262 ms 13 ae-2-2.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net (4.69.132.85) 151.180 ms 147.212 ms 151.137 ms 14 ae-7-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.134.21) 139.089 ms 143.037 ms 143.045 ms 15 ae-73-73.csw2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.145) 150.940 ms ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.133) 147.025 ms ae-83-83.csw3.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.151.157) 146.992 ms 16 ae-22-70.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.68) 146.894 ms ae-32-80.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.132) 146.952 ms ae-22-70.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.69.145.68) 143.067 ms 17 DATABANK-HO.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.71.170.2) 142.983 ms 142.993 ms 142.981 ms 18 * * * 19 www.centos.org (72.232.194.162) 154.979 ms !X 154.962 ms !X 154.926 ms !X Regards, Michel ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Michel van Deventer mic...@van.deventer.cx wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:41 +0100, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 19:32 +0100, Ken Smith wrote: I available from India too. at this point of time -- Regards, Rajagopal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:03:28PM +, Mitch Patenaude wrote: I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or renaming) slapd.d? Does anybody know the proper format for slapd.d entries? I might as well spam my own page (where I suggest deleting it) for LDAP. http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/ldap.html I don't know of anyone who got it working with that slap.d, nor have I seen any documentation on it--on the other hand, I didn't look very hard. I would almost guarantee it adds no new advantages. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: Could I be seeing Billy's asteroid body? Giles: Astral body, and I don't know. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/2011 02:57 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 14:50 -0400, ken wrote: Tried from two places in England on different unrelated networks. Loading fine in Canada. Yet another reason to move to Canada... How much are the Canadian Tourist Board paying you ;-) The grass is always greener on the other side, eh? I've been looking to move away for a few years. :P -- Digimer E-Mail: digi...@alteeve.com Freenode handle: digimer Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org At what point did we forget that the Space Shuttle was, essentially, a program that strapped human beings to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On 08/17/2011 07:20 PM, Always Learning wrote: Oh well must move to Plus Net for off-site use (they give extra IPs and are owned by BT). Tried unsuccessfully via Claranet and Talk Talk Business (formerly Nildram, Pipex, Tiscali, Opal) Never tried Plus Net to be honest, so I don't know what they are like. However I'm only with BT because I don't have much of a choice out here in Lincolnshire. I Had Tiscali, I was glad to get off of them. Though I was sad to leave Be* ISP when I moved from Essex to Lincs. Going from a Steady 1.6/1.5MB/s (Not a typo, Megabytes not Megabits) to a Steady 1.0 to 3.0Mb/s was a harsh drop! (ADSL2+ to ADSL) Feels like I went back to dial up.. but it works.. :-). -- Jake ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 20:21 +0100, Jake Shipton wrote: I Had Tiscali, I was glad to get off of them. Tiscali/Talk Talk/Opal can be an unforgettable nightmare. Though I was sad to leave Be* ISP when I moved from Essex to Lincs. They used highly skilled support staff in Rumania and Czech Republic and probably other Eastern European countries too. Going from a Steady 1.6/1.5MB/s (Not a typo, Megabytes not Megabits) to a Steady 1.0 to 3.0Mb/s was a harsh drop! (ADSL2+ to ADSL) Feels like I went back to dial up.. but it works.. :-). There is FTTC (Fibre to the (road side) cabinet) locally. Plus Net do it, but ghastly Talk Talk Business will not. 50% success. Only my Talk Talk Business connection will not connect to Centos.org. Perhaps it is because business closed down at 17:00 hours or so Talk Talk Business believe. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Web Site centos.org is down
www.centos.org is now restored to Talk Talk customers in one of England's most densely populated areas. Bye. -- With best regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
On 08/17/2011 12:03 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote: ... I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or renaming) slapd.d? Does anybody know the proper format for slapd.d entries? ... You'd be best off learning the new method of configuration as I've heard rumors that the slapd.conf file will be deprecated at some point. Here you can find some additional information: http://www.zytrax.com/books/ldap/ch6/slapd-config.html Basically, any slap* command which can reference a file will perform the conversion. HTH, -- Josh Miller Open Source Solutions Architect http://itsecureadmin.com/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] which firewall to automatically block bandwidth abusers?
Hi, I'm looking for a firewall (preferably on Linux / UNIX) that could automatically block bandwidth abusers as soon as a connection goes over a certain speed, or limit - i.e. either more than say 3Mb/s or 10GB in a giving period (like weekly / monthly). But, I need it to block the IP to, or where the traffic comes from, or goes to. i.e. a user logs into a web server and upload a LOT of data, then the firewall should block him, but not other people. Or, someone uploads a small bit of data but downloads a lot of data and then get's blocked. But I need to set thresholds And I should be able to exclude certain IP's / domains from the limits. Does this make sense? Can this be done with iptables? If so, how? If not, what else could I use for this? A normal DDOS prevention firewall doesn't really work since it only blocks traffic coming in. But I need to limit traffic going out as well. The servers behind the firewall will serve mail, http, ftp, sql and SSH -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
On Aug 17, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Mitch Patenaude wrote: I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or renaming) slapd.d? Does anybody know the proper format for slapd.d entries? presuming what you are referring to is dynamic configuration - flat files are not used any more. Haven't tried with CentOS 6 because I switched my newer setups to Ubuntu but Ubuntu 10.04 also uses dynamic configuration methods and if that is the case... /etc/openldap/slapd.conf is meaningless - at least in Ubuntu renaming or deleting /etc/openldap/slapd.d would be a self-defeating act... that's where the results of dynamic configuration will end up. start over, baby steps... script everything you do so it's repeatable start by adding your schema's then define the backend then define the base then define your ACL's then you can pull in the DSA Craig ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Change bash colours like in VIM
In VIM one can easily change colours with :set backgorund=dark. This doesn't actually change the background, but rather uses a colour scheme that is designed for a dark background. Is there any quick command like this for bash? I don't want to edit the whole config file if there is a quick way to get a better colour scheme. Thanks. -- Dotan Cohen http://gibberish.co.il http://what-is-what.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RAID5 suddenly broken
Hello, I have a RAID5 array on my CentOS 5.6 x86_64 workstation which suddenly failed to work (actually after the system could not resume from a suspend). I had recently issues after moving the workstation to another office, where one of the disks got accidently unplugged. But the RAID was working and it had reconstructed (as far as I can tell) the data. After I replugged the disk, it was working normally over the last two days (enough to get back to a proper state I guess/hoped) This RAID is used as an LVM volume group for all my important data, among them the root of the operating system(s). It based on four partitions on four separate disks (the third partition of each disk, 3 active, one spare) When booting, I get an error message similar to: raid5 failed: No md superblock detected on /dev/md0. and the LVM volume group does not come up. I then booted using the CentOS 5.6 LiveCD and tried to run a few mdadm command (see just below). It seems that there are some data still lying around, but I'm not very experienced with RAID and I thought that I would ask for advice before trying commands which may impact the data such as assemble, etc. Thanks in advance for any help! Mathieu [root@livecd ~]# mdadm --misc -E /dev/md0 mdadm: No md superblock detected on /dev/md0. [root@livecd ~]# mdadm --misc -Q /dev/md0 /dev/md0: is an md device which is not active /dev/md0: No md super block found, not an md component. [root@livecd ~]# mdadm --misc -D /dev/md0 mdadm: md device /dev/md0 does not appear to be active. [root@livecd ~]# mdadm -E /dev/sd*3 /dev/sda3: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : 7533411a:f066a145:1e89d48e:1a8374a3 Creation Time : Tue Dec 1 12:01:05 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 204796416 (195.31 GiB 209.71 GB) Array Size : 409592832 (390.62 GiB 419.42 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Wed Aug 17 14:47:36 2011 State : active Active Devices : 2 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : ed6d5dcd - correct Events : 38857 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 256K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 0 830 active sync /dev/sda3 0 0 830 active sync /dev/sda3 1 1 001 faulty removed 2 2 8 512 active sync /dev/sdd3 /dev/sdb3: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : 7533411a:f066a145:1e89d48e:1a8374a3 Creation Time : Tue Dec 1 12:01:05 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 204796416 (195.31 GiB 209.71 GB) Array Size : 409592832 (390.62 GiB 419.42 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 4 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Wed Aug 10 11:52:15 2011 State : clean Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 4 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 Checksum : ed63a948 - correct Events : 9022 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 256K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 1 8 191 active sync /dev/sdb3 0 0 830 active sync /dev/sda3 1 1 8 191 active sync /dev/sdb3 2 2 8 512 active sync /dev/sdd3 3 3 8 353 spare /dev/sdc3 /dev/sdc3: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : 7533411a:f066a145:1e89d48e:1a8374a3 Creation Time : Tue Dec 1 12:01:05 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 204796416 (195.31 GiB 209.71 GB) Array Size : 409592832 (390.62 GiB 419.42 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 3 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Tue Aug 16 17:48:59 2011 State : clean Active Devices : 3 Working Devices : 3 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : ed6bf2b0 - correct Events : 10670 Layout : left-symmetric Chunk Size : 256K Number Major Minor RaidDevice State this 1 8 351 active sync /dev/sdc3 0 0 830 active sync /dev/sda3 1 1 8 351 active sync /dev/sdc3 2 2 8 512 active sync /dev/sdd3 /dev/sdd3: Magic : a92b4efc Version : 0.90.00 UUID : 7533411a:f066a145:1e89d48e:1a8374a3 Creation Time : Tue Dec 1 12:01:05 2009 Raid Level : raid5 Used Dev Size : 204796416 (195.31 GiB 209.71 GB) Array Size : 409592832 (390.62 GiB 419.42 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 0 Update Time : Wed Aug 17 14:47:36 2011 State : active Active Devices : 2 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 0 Checksum : ed6d5e01 - correct Events : 38857 Layout : left-symmetric
Re: [CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:10 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:03:28PM +, Mitch Patenaude wrote: I'm having trouble getting openldap through its initial setup. I created a /etc/openldap/slap.conf file with a default rootdn and rootpw, and they didn't seem to take effect. After much wailing and gnashing of teeth I found that if there is a config directory at /etc/openldap/slapd.d, it will ignore slapd.conf. I can't figure out how to translate slapd.conf into the (new?) standard of slapd.d because all the examples I can find still use slapd.conf. Am I better off just deleting (or renaming) slapd.d? Does anybody know the proper format for slapd.d entries? I might as well spam my own page (where I suggest deleting it) for LDAP. http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/ldap.html I don't know of anyone who got it working with that slap.d, nor have I seen any documentation on it--on the other hand, I didn't look very hard. I would almost guarantee it adds no new advantages. I can't say that I see any advantages to dynamic configuration but perhaps in time, they will dawn on me. In the meantime, if upstream and thus CentOS 6 are using dynamic configuration (and I assume that is what it is by reference to slapd.d directory), then your page is rather outdated and useful only for earlier releases. The last time you pimped your page, I noted that it wasn't bad but it completely had everything wrong on the topic of TLS. Your page talks about using TLS but TLS doesn't use port 636. LDAP SSL uses port 636. LDAP SSL is costly in terms of computing power, deprecated and not recommended which is why it ships 'off'. If you can turn off LDAP SSL (and port 636) and connect to port 389 and use -ZZ option, then you will know that you are using TLS. example... ldapsearch -ZZ -h srv2 '(uid=craig)' -D 'uid=craig,ou=people,dc=azapple,dc=com' -W uid, cn -b 'ou=people,dc=azapple,dc=com' Enter LDAP Password: # extended LDIF # # LDAPv3 # base ou=people,dc=azapple,dc=com with scope subtree # filter: (uid=craig) # requesting: uid, cn # # craig, people, azapple.com dn: uid=craig,ou=people,dc=azapple,dc=com cn: Craig White # search result search: 3 result: 0 Success # numResponses: 2 # numEntries: 1 Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] which firewall to automatically block bandwidth abusers?
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 21:50 +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a firewall (preferably on Linux / UNIX) that could automatically block bandwidth abusers as soon as a connection goes over a certain speed, or limit - i.e. either more than say 3Mb/s or 10GB in a giving period (like weekly / monthly). But, I need it to block the IP to, or where the traffic comes from, or goes to. i.e. a user logs into a web server and upload a LOT of data, then the firewall should block him, but not other people. Or, someone uploads a small bit of data but downloads a lot of data and then get's blocked. But I need to set thresholds And I should be able to exclude certain IP's / domains from the limits. Does this make sense? Can this be done with iptables? If so, how? If not, what else could I use for this? A normal DDOS prevention firewall doesn't really work since it only blocks traffic coming in. But I need to limit traffic going out as well. The servers behind the firewall will serve mail, http, ftp, sql and SSH http://tinyurl.com/3n5yn8u Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OpenLDAP setup and bootstraping in CentOS 6
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:05:34PM -0700, Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 15:10 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: http://home.roadrunner.com/~computertaijutsu/ldap.html I can't say that I see any advantages to dynamic configuration but perhaps in time, they will dawn on me. In the meantime, if upstream and thus CentOS 6 are using dynamic configuration (and I assume that is what it is by reference to slapd.d directory), then your page is rather outdated and useful only for earlier releases. The last time you pimped your page, I noted that it wasn't bad but it completely had everything wrong on the topic of TLS. Your page talks about using TLS but TLS doesn't use port 636. LDAP SSL uses port 636. Which is clearly stated there. I'll add a note soon that the page is outdated, but not tonight. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Oz: It's Willow, she's nearby. Cordelia: What? You can smell her? She doesn't even wear perfume. Oz: She's afraid. Cordelia: Oh my God, is this some sort of residual werewolf thing? This is very disturbing. Oz: I really agree. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
