[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0394 CentOS 6 mod_nss Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0394
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0394.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d2e7f2faf2232f8d39a947b5cfa9b85b88a7af3b3c80643dd718e21093cdf930
mod_nss-1.0.8-14.el6_2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
1919ffab8b134f005ced48266380cf676f91642c8ccfb35f9169f17bfc25fc79
mod_nss-1.0.8-14.el6_2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
f0cce91da3f8c2233a80d301f1c38723b60e0bf858e109afbc24aa9106426522
mod_nss-1.0.8-14.el6_2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0397 Moderate CentOS 5 glibc Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0397 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0397.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
b98c8325b4f30fcffad53d87b46c4ff16cffae4ca213635a04e949b985a34881
glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
22e894e86112ef601709180bea56e439d69351481531285d14c0a05ef77481aa
glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i686.rpm
1b26ee0b656238a3afa2aefdaf85bd95bbfd2ddc20121197e932e8c6c3beaa83
glibc-common-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
bebe53810bb7974f87f6b5fe7c58cb203d2667429b14061c3ce6f8f60bf934b9
glibc-devel-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
388aca9f627b680f75fc0c49e4009a3d603a72ff2d968e466de1cfb6ac7aa93f
glibc-headers-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
e90213fbb90e5c969a7ad5203a8624be79aca326d4cbff5ccce6fb7021b55082
glibc-utils-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
70cfdaabe04c6c733ae4f5bfee43fb5c8a8152bfaf5f79ff537704f58c3d2516
nscd-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
x86_64:
22e894e86112ef601709180bea56e439d69351481531285d14c0a05ef77481aa
glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i686.rpm
c21e94b0b876d6c90d68665ff3c066b4c82ba790ffb7c1bc3c67e4b683c7764c
glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
4d1f2e66bd8751237fa3aea185b225502a7b3d3fff7396b04ca29a530bb1cef7
glibc-common-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
bebe53810bb7974f87f6b5fe7c58cb203d2667429b14061c3ce6f8f60bf934b9
glibc-devel-2.5-81.el5_8.1.i386.rpm
14ac257956bddf2408218fb2f1cdc22fd53274096dc35c3fd3e6475b75855eca
glibc-devel-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
38aa08e58fbd6ed387e3f8ce4a0d07cd86907faac85c7201087b5622bcf7ac00
glibc-headers-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
7c3855ae1aa2ecd34cd0241757a17220ce2629beae1f9d04b09b3ed0682ba288
glibc-utils-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
ec447e02331e2f57847ee377e8957d4bfb68cf0174f40c98625d6642c1cdd95b
nscd-2.5-81.el5_8.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
a9aab095094ebca9bdeb875a32482fe6aa9b91de6eaaf7c9d8e4f2c59b86742f
glibc-2.5-81.el5_8.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-virt] Installing Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid guest on Centos 5 using virt-manager
Hi, i'm trying to install an Ubuntu Lucid PV guest on a Centos host but I can't seem to find a working installation URL. I tried http://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/installer-amd64/; and various subdirectories but I always get the error Could not find an installable distributio at In the OS Variant box I chose Ubuntu 9.04 as that is the closest to what I'm trying to install. Any idea how this works? Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS-es] SQUID
hola es necesario tener dos trajetas de red para configurar squid ? saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] SQUID
no precisamente, pero si ese equipo es el que va a hacer de servidor de navegación (nat) para una red LAN si, es mejor con dos 2012/3/19 Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com hola es necesario tener dos trajetas de red para configurar squid ? saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, David Rosado T. 095583628 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] SQUID
On 03/19/2012 03:05 PM, Ignacio Ordeñana wrote: hola es necesario tener dos trajetas de red para configurar squid ? no saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Cantidad de RAM máxima en CentOS 6.2
El 16 de marzo de 2012 11:28, Ernesto Pérez Estévez cen...@ecualinux.comescribió: On 03/16/2012 08:27 AM, Héctor Herrera wrote: Osea, eso quiere decir que tengo que fijarme en el CD de instalación, verdad? (se me había olvidado mencionar que instalé CentOS 6.2 x86_64 netinstall) Me convendría entonces instalarme un core de CentOS en vez de un netinstall? no precisamente, al ser de 64bits soporta una enorme cantidad de ram... no importa del tipo de sistema que instales, es de 64bits. saludos epe Ah y muchas gracias por las respuestas! ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es jjaja, el tiempo gasta es mientras hace un reconocimiento de memoria, una vez carga el SO es un avión. -- Carlos R!. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] LVM
On Sunday 18 March 2012 19.40.21 Ray Van Dolson wrote: On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Markus Falb wrote: ... What filesystem? Assuming ext3, this cannot shrunk without unmounting. I believe the following *should* work for ext3 $ umount /home $ e2fsck -f /dev/vg_web/lv_home $ resize2fs /dev/vg_web/lv_home 150g $ lvresize -L 150g /dev/vg_web/lv_home $ mount /home I am not sure how safe it is. Take care! I was under the impression that you needed to unmount the file system to shrink it with resize2fs (you can grow it online however). Which I guess is why Markus wrote umount /home above... I'd like to add that it's probably good paranoia not to size the lv down too tightly (should it happen to become smaller than the fs then ooops). That is, I'd size the lv down to a comfortable margin above the fs size (and then size the fs up to the device size). I can also add that I've successfully managed to shrink ext3 before but a verified backup is probably good advice.. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LVM
On 03/19/12 2:14 AM, Peter Kjellström wrote: I can also add that I've successfully managed to shrink ext3 before but a verified backup is probably good advice.. does resize2fs relocate blocks or is it restricted to shrinking only to last high water block in use ? -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
Jake Shipton writes: On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 + n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Hi, I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5 (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a: yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice* If you have RPMs from libreoffice.org in use ignore this message as you will run into conflicts! Thanks for your efforts Nux :-). If at some point it would be possible for you to support 3.5 that would be great :-). I am currently using the 3.5.1 official RPM's in a home repo (so it's also shared to another CentOS box). But none-the-less it's good to see some progress regarding Libreoffice CentOS :-). Jake, Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit: ... I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages? One interest in using official RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice, is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines. I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now). So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...) -- Philippe Naudin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 + n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Jake, Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages? Hi, The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them. The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie, packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal. But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would require a rebuild. So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to /var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS) Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run: createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install libobasis* libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages. and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the above..) This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo). I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for EL6. I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it: Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core here) But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-). PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had been awake only a few minutes. -- Jake Shipton (JakeMS) GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
Philippe Naudin writes: Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit: ... I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages? One interest in using official RPMs, from OpenOffice or LibreOffice, is their limited set of dependencies. They don't require gnome, and this makes a big difference on headless, soundless machines. I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of official *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and then install again openoffice (or libreoffice now). So : me too ;) (I am interested to hear about a better way to install official LibreOffice...) -- Philippe Naudin Thanks for taking the time to reply, Philippe. I'll try to put all your guys opinions together and see if I can come with anything that could work long term. Right now I'm trying to backport from Fedora, and while the heavylifting is done by Fedora people, it's still not easy to do this. I'll keep you guys updated. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice rpm's vs Centos testing repo
Jake Shipton writes: On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 + n...@li.nux.ro wrote: Jake, Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list. I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any meta packages? Hi, The setup is pretty basic (imo) because the repo is used only in a LAN and never used outside of this LAN, I do not worry about generating delta's or stuff like that. I don't even GPG sign them. The local repo is also used for other self compiled RPM's. These would usually be tagged with a .hr tag (ie, packagename-version.el6.hr.x86_64) for easy removal. But as far as I am aware to do that, with official RPM's it would require a rebuild. So what I tend to do is just open up filezilla, ftp to a libreoffice mirror, browse my way to libreoffice stable RPM's, and download them to /var/www/html/repository/arch (Which is actually just a link to /home/username/rpmbuild/RPMS) Obviously the repository it's self is pre-setup because of the other packages, so as my normal user next up I would just run: createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/arch createrepo --update ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/SRPMS A quick check for SELinux permission's and it's good to go :-). Now from local machines on the LAN I would just use yum install libobasis* libreoffice* etc, then pick and remove the unnecessary extra packages. and yum update takes care of updates :-) (after I have redone the above..) This is something most user could easily do them selves, and it could also be done publicly, however it is still a messy method even if somebody else does it for you (and you just enable/add the repo). I would still prefer to be able to have RPM's built specifically for EL6. I guess that raises the question of You have the repo, rpmbuild etc setup, why don't you build them your self?, and to answer it: Because I do not have the CPU Power :-) (Still got a Single core here) But yeah.. that's basically all I do :-). PS: Sorry for any typo's etc I was tired when I wrote this email, had been awake only a few minutes. Thanks Jake for the details. Well, what you say about building it yourself is what I'm actually trying to do now, but it is not a piece of cake: http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/i386/ http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice-testing/el6/x86_64/ But at least it's done Fedora/Redhat way :-) I will seriously look into making a proper repo out of the Libreoffice.org rpms.. I'll let you know how it goes. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat
Arif, You would want to run tcpdump (or some other sniffer() on the host server, so that you can confirm that there is two-way traffic. If tcpdump on the host server does not show any traffic from your client, something is blocking inbound. If you see traffic coming into the server, but nothing returning, you probably have issues around OSI layers 5-7. If you see a response, but you did not see from your client, then it may something blocking return traffic. - Rilindo -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Arif Hossain Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 8:25 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: [CentOS] testing a udp socket with netcat i've this udp daemon which is waiting for an incoming udp datagram. now i want test this daemon for random garbage to test how it behaves. My udp daemon is running because its shows on netstat. problem is if i issue following command for putting udp datagram : $nc -uvvz host port it does not output any thing. i have straced the udp daemon. which does not returns from recv() call. my goal is to put arbitrary data on the udp socket by netcat. i do not have any experience regarding netcat so i'm asking if anyone can help me out with this. thanks in advance. -- You have a voice The King's Speech Public Key : $ gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-key C88CFC23 This message, including any attachments, is the property of Sears Holdings Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries. It is confidential and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it without reading the contents. Thank you. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] LVM
On 03/18/2012 10:34 AM, madu...@gmail.com wrote: I need to shrink /home(755G) to 150GB and use free space to add to the existing /(50G). ... Need to have the step, can this be done online or need to go offline (umount) the file systems. To shink an ext3 filesystem, it'll have to be offline. Start by identifying and terminating any applications with files open on /home using fuser -vm /home/. Once there are no open files, you can unmount the filesystem and use fsadm resize /dev/mapper/vg_web-lv_home755G 150G to shrink the filesystem. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] process accounting on 5.7
Hey folks, I turned on process accounting and had a peek at the man page for dump-acct but I am still left wondering how best to make use of this info. We want to be able to produce some monthly stats on which labs are using how much of our clusters.I know our clustering software has the ability to do this but unfortuantely not everyone uses the cluster commands as much as I keep reminding them. Would be nice to be able to show that user X used Y% of the CPU in a given month. I've been googling but not turning up much more than how to install psacct and run the base commands. thanks, -Alan -- “Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV” - Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] nfs client issues since updating from 5.7 to 5.8 on the NFS server
Hi all, Wondering if any one has seen odd NFS client behavior with a 5.8 NFS server? While by Nix and OSX clients are fine, my Windows clients are acting up. I can no longer mount any NFS share from a 5.8 NFS server box on my Winblowz clients. I'll keep digging around but nothing has changed on the client end. Since my NFS server OS has changed, I'm assuming a client adjustment is needed. Also, does any one know of a way to max out verbosity on my NFS server? Things are showing (failed and successful client NFS mount attempts) in /var/log/messages but I've a feeling that something is missing. Thanks in advance, - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ABRT interpretation / guidance needed
Greetings -
I have a Centos 6 box fully updated that intermittently sends me an
[abrt] full crash report email. I am not familiar with these at all and
in my limited google search have not found good information to interpret
this information. The most recent (and the most frequent one) is listed
below, also I have listed the lines from /var/log/messages that correspond
to it. This box is an Dell Optiplex GX520 that I am temporarily using as a
location to store some backup information while I put together a more
permanant backup solution. The box is headless with Webmin installed to
manage it. It continues running when these occur, and I have not noticed
any detrimental effects. I am trying to understand the primary issue these
messages are trying to tell me so that I can do a little more research and
figure out what I need to do about it (if anything). My limited
understanding reading this information is that Webmin is running a cron job
that references rpm, and that something in rpm is causing a problem with the
kernel?
Thanks for any interpretation, or good reading references anyone can
provide.
/var/log/messages
Mar 19 15:07:10 tempbackup kernel: rpm[19022]: segfault at 8b96000 ip
008a3fcc sp bfe251e0 error 4 in libc-2.12.so[837000+189000]
Mar 19 15:07:11 tempbackup abrt[19023]: saved core dump of pid 19022
(/bin/rpm) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-03-19-15:07:10-19022.new/coredump
(3825664 bytes)
Mar 19 15:07:11 tempbackup abrtd: Directory 'ccpp-2012-03-19-15:07:10-19022'
creation detected
Mar 19 15:07:11 tempbackup abrtd: Freeing read locks for locker 0x167a:
19022/3079309088
Mar 19 15:07:11 tempbackup abrtd: Freeing read locks for locker 0x167b:
19022/3079309088
Mar 19 15:07:11 tempbackup abrtd: Freeing read locks for locker 0x167c:
19022/3079309088
Mar 19 15:07:20 tempbackup abrtd: Sending an email...
Mar 19 15:07:20 tempbackup abrtd: Email was sent to: root@localhost
Mar 19 15:07:21 tempbackup abrtd: DUP_OF_DIR:
/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-03-17-14:28:03-10886
Mar 19 15:07:21 tempbackup abrtd: Dump directory is a duplicate of
/var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2012-03-17-14:28:03-10886
Mar 19 15:07:21 tempbackup abrtd: Deleting dump directory
ccpp-2012-03-19-15:07:10-19022 (dup of ccpp-2012-03-17-14:28:03-10886),
sending dbus signal
[abrt] full crash report
Duplicate check
=
Common information
=
package
-
rpm-4.8.0-19.el6
architecture
-
i686
kernel
-
2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.i686
Additional information
=
uid
-
0
time
-
1332194830
executable
-
/bin/rpm
hostname
-
tempbackup.mei.lan
component
-
rpm
username
-
root
reason
-
Process /bin/rpm was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
cmdline
-
rpm -q -a --queryformat
'%{NAME}\\n%{VERSION}-%{RELEASE}\\n%{EPOCH}\\n%{GROUP}\\n%{SUMMARY}\\n\\n'
analyzer
-
CCpp
maps
-
0023b000-003ae000 r-xp fd:00 142717 /lib/libdb-4.7.so
003ae000-003b1000 rw-p 00173000 fd:00 142717 /lib/libdb-4.7.so
0071-0072d000 r-xp fd:00 142448
/lib/libgcc_s-4.4.6-20110824.so.1
0072d000-0072e000 rw-p 0001d000 fd:00 142448
/lib/libgcc_s-4.4.6-20110824.so.1
00741000-00748000 r-xp fd:00 159125 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0
00748000-00749000 r--p 6000 fd:00 159125 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0
00749000-0074a000 rw-p 7000 fd:00 159125 /lib/libacl.so.1.1.0
00758000-00795000 r-xp fd:00 11637 /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so
00795000-00796000 ---p 0003d000 fd:00 11637 /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so
00796000-00797000 r--p 0003d000 fd:00 11637 /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so
00797000-00798000 rw-p 0003e000 fd:00 11637 /usr/lib/libsoftokn3.so
007ff000-00803000 r-xp fd:00 141420 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0
00803000-00804000 r--p 3000 fd:00 141420 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0
00804000-00805000 rw-p 4000 fd:00 141420 /lib/libattr.so.1.1.0
00815000-00833000 r-xp fd:00 156172 /lib/ld-2.12.so
00833000-00834000 r--p 0001d000 fd:00 156172 /lib/ld-2.12.so
00834000-00835000 rw-p 0001e000 fd:00 156172 /lib/ld-2.12.so
00837000-009c r-xp fd:00 156173 /lib/libc-2.12.so
009c-009c1000 ---p 00189000 fd:00 156173 /lib/libc-2.12.so
009c1000-009c3000 r--p 00189000 fd:00 156173 /lib/libc-2.12.so
009c3000-009c4000 rw-p 0018b000 fd:00 156173 /lib/libc-2.12.so
009c4000-009c7000 rw-p 00:00 0
009c9000-009cc000 r-xp fd:00 156229 /lib/libdl-2.12.so
009cc000-009cd000 r--p 2000 fd:00 156229 /lib/libdl-2.12.so
009cd000-009ce000 rw-p 3000 fd:00 156229 /lib/libdl-2.12.so
009d-009e7000 r-xp fd:00 156219 /lib/libpthread-2.12.so
009e7000-009e8000 r--p 00016000 fd:00 156219 /lib/libpthread-2.12.so
009e8000-009e9000 rw-p 00017000 fd:00 156219 /lib/libpthread-2.12.so
009e9000-009eb000 rw-p 00:00 0
009ed000-00a15000 r-xp fd:00 156252 /lib/libm-2.12.so
00a15000-00a16000 r--p 00027000 fd:00 156252 /lib/libm-2.12.so
00a16000-00a17000 rw-p 00028000 fd:00 156252 /lib/libm-2.12.so
00a19000-00a2 r-xp fd:00 156224 /lib/librt-2.12.so
00a2-00a21000
[CentOS] Where Did All The Noise Go?
OK, I've got 2 machines running CentOS. One running CentOS x86_64 6.2 and the other running CentOS x86_64 5.8. At some upgrade point I've lost all sound using Firefox and Thunderbird with my Gnome desktop. When I bring up 'System', 'Preferences', 'Sound' and go to the hardware tab and test the speakers, they are working. Any ideas on how to get the sound back? TIA, Gene + It's impossible for everything to be true at the same time + ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
