Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS 6.2 *TO* a USB drive, not installing from USB.

2012-04-07 Thread Emmanuel Noobadmin
On 4/5/12, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
 The grub order and names and the linux kernel/udev order and names should
 not be assumed to have any correlation of any kind, since they are
 discovered differently.

Yes, that is what I understand from the grub manual. However, from
that I also understand and expect the first and only device grub could
find would be hd0

 If you can boot a USB live media on this box, you could bring up a grub
 shell and see how grub sees the disks from that (at a root prompt, type
 'grub' and you'll be greeted with the grub shell, and then you can do
 detection or whatever from that).  This also works in the rescue environment
 given by the install media; you do want to do a 'chroot /mnt/sysimage' in
 that shell before entering the grub shell, though.

I've done this previously from the rescue environment but got no
closer to resolving this.

I've tried it again with a default install of CentOS 6.2, using
default drive layout and all.
On first boot, I get the grub shell but I have not been able to find
any command that would list valid devices grub can find, apart from
the tab button.

Rebooting into the rescue environment, chrooting into the drive,
grub-install generates the map to hd(0) which was expected. Runing
grub shell and trying root (hd0) also works.

However, rebooting after updating the grub device map always results
in Booting from local disk... Error 21 which indicates grub couldn't
find the drive specified.

Any ideas how I can probe/list devices within grub shell? I've done
the stupid method of root(hd0,x) all the way up to root(hd8,3) without
luck.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007.
The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports.
I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I 
cannot find one.

Is logwatch the only one that is included?

thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] - tigervnc-server with kde

2012-04-07 Thread Paolo De Michele
Hi all

I have a problem in the configuration of tigervnc-server-use centos 6.1
and tigervnc-server version is that which lies in the repo

I followed the following steps:

- tigervnc-installed
- added the user in the section /etc/sysconfig/vncservers
- set a password using the vncpasswd
- left by default the xstartup file created
- restart vncserver service

When I connect remotely to my host everything works just that regularly
see a gnome desktop instead of one kde (like I would)
I tried to change several times the xstartup to no avail.
can someone tell me exactly which strings should I put to view my
desktop with kde?

Thanks in advance

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???

2012-04-07 Thread ken
yum update output:

...
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric
--- Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
   -- Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 
1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed)
Error: Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 
1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed)
...

# rpm -qa| grep goffice
goffice-0.2.2-1.el5

# yum deplist gnumeric|grep goffice
   dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2
provider: goffice.i386 0.2.2-1.el5

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Mail Lists
On 04/07/2012 10:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
 Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007.
 The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports.
 I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I
 cannot find one.

 Is logwatch the only one that is included?

 thanks
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Have you tried editing the files in

/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/

or

/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf

?

-- 
Brian - Get the latest Fremont, OH Weather 
http://www.Fremont-OH-Weather.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] gnumeric/goffice: defective RPM from rpmforge ???

2012-04-07 Thread David Hrbáč
Dne 7.4.2012 21:31, ken napsal(a):
 yum update output:

 ...
 -- Running transaction check
 -- Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric
 --- Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated
 -- Finished Dependency Resolution
 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 
 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed)
 Error: Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by package 
 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 (installed)
 ...

 # rpm -qa| grep goffice
 goffice-0.2.2-1.el5

 # yum deplist gnumeric|grep goffice
dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2
 provider: goffice.i386 0.2.2-1.el5

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi,
Please create an issue on GitHub: https://github.com/repoforge/rpms/issues
Thanks,
DH
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Michael Davis
On 4/7/2012 3:55 PM, Mail Lists wrote:
 On 04/07/2012 10:09 AM, Bob Hoffman wrote:
 Logwatch file shows last upgrade to the code was 2007.
 The unmatched entries are killing me in the reports.
 I figure there must be a newer utility centos has in the repo but I
 cannot find one.

 Is logwatch the only one that is included?

 thanks
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 Have you tried editing the files in

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/

 or

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf

 ?

Using customizations to logwatch helps greatly with unmatched entries. I 
was spending too much time looking through the logwatch email due to 
unmatched entries that I did not need to see. So, I used customizations 
to eliminate or consolidate into one line the unmatched entries.

Customizations are placed in /etc/logwatch under the appropriate 
directory (e.g. conf or scripts). Logwatch will use both the default and 
the custom configurations. Settings in the custom file override default 
settings. A custom script will be executed in place of the default 
(standard) script.

For customizations, I included one custom setting to direct logwatch to 
ignore entries from specific hosts. I created a new configuration file 
in /etc/logwatch/conf/logfiles for the service (dovecot.conf in my 
case), adding the one setting I needed ($dovecot_ignore_host in my case.)

For scripts, I copied the default script from 
/usr/share/logwatch/scripts/services (dovecot in my case) into the 
/etc/logwatch/scripts/services directory, then modified it to meet my 
requirements. (I added elsif clauses to check for the unmatched entries 
and handle them as needed.)

Also, updates to logwatch do not remove my custom changes.

It took a couple of hours for me to get it working.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Have you tried editing the files in

/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/

or

/usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf

?

Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either...
Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatch.

The location you refer to will get over written on an update...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Apparent Bug In Gnome Games

2012-04-07 Thread Mark LaPierre
Hey Y'all

Can someone suggest the appropriate place to report a bug in a Gnome game?

-- 
 _
°v°
   /(_)\
^ ^  Mark LaPierre
Registerd Linux user No #267004
www.counter.li.org

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 7:49 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 Have you tried editing the files in

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/

 or

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf

 ?
 Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either...
 Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatch.

 The location you refer to will get over written on an update...
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Yes, this is my concern.
I have been putting together extensive step by step notes and how tos 
for everything I am doing. I hope soon to be able to put this in an easy 
to use format or book so others starting from scratch do not take weeks 
or months to do it..or worse, leave hacker openings.

In this regard, the logwatch unmatched are a little much (the imap 
disconnect, some rbl_client stuff). I thought of going through some 
walkthrough in changing it, but that seems a bit overboard to help a new 
person out...but still on the board.

I just assumed there was something newer out there. 2007 was the last 
release notes for the version installed on centos. There is a newer 
version out there, but that would be off of the base repo and not sure 
if I want to go that route in the how-to.

I think it is important to write all this stuff out for others like me. 
I literally spent a month trying to bond and bridge my single server 
into virtual machines. Something was causing a timeout/arp something or 
another and one VM would always disappear.
A whole month. hours a day.
Then I found out that there is a LONG standing bug in rhel and fedora 
that specifically deals with two internal eths bonded together going to 
a bridge in the same computer, with libvirtd. :(

so, a month wasted. Yikes. Having that little bit of knowledge in a 
how-to manual could save someone the trials and pain I went through. 
(although, on the plus side, I REALLY know alot about bridge and bonds 
inside the server now..lol)

I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the 
postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is 
and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol

So, thanks for the input. I will stick with logwatch and give it a go.

bob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I just assumed there was something newer out there. 2007 was the last
release notes for the version installed on centos. There is a newer
version out there, but that would be off of the base repo and not sure
if I want to go that route in the how-to.

Dates aren't always a good judge of package quality. In the case of
of this one, there really hasn't been a need to update it, as it just
works. I assume some scripts have undergone changes though...

I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the
postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is
and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol

Only ignore what you encounter and deduce to be not important.
Thats the premise on which this works, known bad _or_ unknown
items are presented to you for you decide what to do.

So, thanks for the input. I will stick with logwatch and give it a go.

Its really not that complicated, logwatch is pretty good at what it
does. Post back with more questions if they arise...

jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Newbie here

2012-04-07 Thread root
Hello there
newbie here,
Finally managed to install 5.1 and hope to get started with RHCT
textbook.  Has anyone gone the self study route ?, any tips/hints to
light the way most appreciated.
Thanks for reading 
Kind regards
Paul

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch?

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 9:37 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 I will take a look and try to see if it will be easy to change the
 postfix and dovecot. More than likely I will just tell them what it is
 and 'good luck' at figuring it out..lol
 Only ignore what you encounter and deduce to be not important.
 Thats the premise on which this works, known bad _or_ unknown
 items are presented to you for you decide what to do.

 So, thanks for the input. I will stick with logwatch and give it a go.
 Its really not that complicated, logwatch is pretty good at what it
 does. Post back with more questions if they arise...


Well. not sure about adding 7.4 yet, but I did go here
http://logreporters.sourceforge.net/
I added the postfix and postfix.conf files in their proper /etc/logwatch 
folders.

7.4, due to licensing, has taken away the awesome postfix reporting that 
is in 7.3. The files located at the above location will bring it all 
back..and then some..lol

might try 7.4 out though.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] rhel/centos alternative to logwatch? [solved]

2012-04-07 Thread Bob Hoffman
On 4/7/2012 7:49 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
 Have you tried editing the files in

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/

 or

 /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/ignore.conf

 ?
 Obvisouly not:) And I hope not either...
 Facilities are provided just for this in /etc/logwatch.

 The location you refer to will get over written on an update...
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


the previous mail says it all, that upgrade worked. And by putting them 
where you said i can keep redhats preferred version

here is what the newer postfix logwatch looks like..
(rather long as I get a LOT of spam rejected..lol)
http://www.politicalgateway.com/postfix.txt

a big upgrade over the older version with 5xx rejects and greylisting stats.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Newbie here

2012-04-07 Thread Eero Volotinen
2012/4/8 root pmcp...@gmail.com:
 Hello there
 newbie here,
 Finally managed to install 5.1 and hope to get started with RHCT
 textbook.  Has anyone gone the self study route ?, any tips/hints to
 light the way most appreciated.
 Thanks for reading
 Kind regards

Hi,

RHCT 5 or RHCE 5 is now obsolete. You should install Centos 6.x
instead of it and follow this book:

http://www.amazon.com/RHCSA-Linux-Certification-Study-Edition/dp/0071765654/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8qid=1333864662sr=8-1

--
Eero, RHCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos