[CentOS-es] Centos y Flumotion
Hola lista!!! Quiero implementar un servidor de stream ( FLUMOTION http://www.flumotion.net/ ) en Centos6 He estado mirando la documentación oficial y veo que es antigua último update del 2008 y en un principio está orientada a Debian. Mi pregunta es, alguién tiene experiencia implementando FLUMOTION en CENTOS ¿? o ha podido localizar documentación más actualizada ¿? Muchas gracias!!! -- Ricardo ___ IT Architect website: http://www.pulsarinara.com ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Preguntas sobre balanceo de carga
Saludos Compañeros En primera instancia me presento y agradesco a los administradores que exista la comunidad. Me e encontrado en un dilema el dia de hoy devido a que tengo 2 servidores Centos para balancear las cargas en los puerto 80 443 8080 y 8443 (apache y tomcat). Por lo pronto tengo solo el puerto 80 a balancear Mi estructura esta asi: ServerA 10.166.36.14 ServerB 10.166.36.15 En el ServerA tengo el keepalived, el haproxy (puerto 8!) y el apache (puerto 80) instalados En el ServerB solo tengo el Apache (puerto 80) En teoria todos ven la IP del ServerA pero ahi el HAPROXY balancea para que sean 2 server usados y todo sea transparente para el usuario El caso aqui es que Solo me reconoce el ServerB, nunca reconoce el A. Yo entro a la pagina de stats (http://10.166.36.15:81/haproxy?stats;) y solo ve el ServerB, pero aun asi le agrego mas Servers y solo reconoce como activo el serverB, ya agrege 2 nodos mas para las pruebas pero sige solo reconociendo al ServerB Este es el Conf de haproxy.cfg listen LoadBalancer bind *:81 mode http stats enable stats auth admin:123456 balance roundrobin cookie JSESSIONID prefix option httpclose option forwardfor option httpchk HEAD /check.txt HTTP/1.0 server ServidorA 10.166.36.11:80 cookie A check server ServidorB 10.166.36.14:80 cookie B check server ServidorC 10.166.36.15:80 cookie C check server ServidorD 10.166.36.18:80 cookie D check Segui los pasos de los manuales comunes. Nota. Esto ya lo habia configurado asi en Ubuntu Server y funciono, ahora quise aplicar los mismo en Centos y veo que existe mayor complejidad. Se antemano muchas gracias y excelente tarde -- ISC Miguel Angel Hernandez Moreno ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
hola he creado un scripts de iptables con nombre firewall.sh pero no se ejecuta en el arranque tengo que hacerlo manualmente para que se ejecute con la instruccion sh firewall.sh.el scripts lo he agregado en /etc/rc.local para su ejecucion y ademas le di propiedades de ejecuion con chmod +x firewall.sh sin mas a que hacer referencia saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
dentor de /etc/rc.local sh /donde7este/tu/firewall.sh Permisos chmod +x firefall.sh Renicia y checalo .. !! Saludos !! El día 17 de abril de 2012 13:36, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola he creado un scripts de iptables con nombre firewall.sh pero no se ejecuta en el arranque tengo que hacerlo manualmente para que se ejecute con la instruccion sh firewall.sh.el scripts lo he agregado en /etc/rc.local para su ejecucion y ademas le di propiedades de ejecuion con chmod +x firewall.sh sin mas a que hacer referencia saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- I.S.C. William López Jiménez -- User Linux # 379636 MSN wljkoal...@hotmail.com Jabber koalas...@jabber.org Web: www.koalasoftmx.tk Twitter: @koalasoft Facebook: william.koalasoft ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
si no me equivoco tenes que cambiar el nombre del archivo y dejarlo simplemente firewall y luego chkconfig --levels 235 firewall on ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
El día 17 de abril de 2012 12:36, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola he creado un scripts de iptables con nombre firewall.sh pero no se ejecuta en el arranque tengo que hacerlo manualmente para que se ejecute con la instruccion sh firewall.sh.el scripts lo he agregado en /etc/rc.local para su ejecucion y ademas le di propiedades de ejecuion con chmod +x firewall.sh sin mas a que hacer referencia Es en rc.local, como te lo han mencionado ejecutando el script. Tambien puedes guardar las confifuraciones ejecutas en el script con: # service iptables save o # /etc/init.d/iptables save Esto guardara las configuraciones en /etc/sysconfig/iptables, para que se apliquen cuando se reinicie la maquina. Espero te sirva tambien. saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
Me sumo al último comentario, añade las configuraciones que buscas en /etc/sysconfig/iptables, todas las configuraciones que guardas al momento de hacer un iptables-save están ahí. El 17 de abril de 2012 16:22, cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com escribió: El día 17 de abril de 2012 12:36, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola he creado un scripts de iptables con nombre firewall.sh pero no se ejecuta en el arranque tengo que hacerlo manualmente para que se ejecute con la instruccion sh firewall.sh.el scripts lo he agregado en /etc/rc.local para su ejecucion y ademas le di propiedades de ejecuion con chmod +x firewall.sh sin mas a que hacer referencia Es en rc.local, como te lo han mencionado ejecutando el script. Tambien puedes guardar las confifuraciones ejecutas en el script con: # service iptables save o # /etc/init.d/iptables save Esto guardara las configuraciones en /etc/sysconfig/iptables, para que se apliquen cuando se reinicie la maquina. Espero te sirva tambien. saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos *Héctor Herrera Anabalón* Egresado ICCI UNAP Soporte IT en CNN Chile Miembro USoLIX Victoria Registered User #548600 (LinuxCounter.net) +56983118902 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] EJECUCION DE SCRIPTS EN EL ARRANQUE
El 17/04/12, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola he creado un scripts de iptables con nombre firewall.sh pero no se ejecuta en el arranque tengo que hacerlo manualmente para que se ejecute con la instruccion sh firewall.sh.el scripts lo he agregado en /etc/rc.local para su ejecucion y ademas le di propiedades de ejecuion con chmod +x firewall.sh sin mas a que hacer referencia Mi estimado supongo que tú conoces o haz leído la doc de CentOS y redhat, ellos te dicen que hacer para guardar las reglas iptables, fue creado por ellos y el lugar esta en /etc/sysconfig/iptables, por qué no sigues los consejos de los expertos? Usa #iptables-save tufile, si estuvieras usando debian ahí si deberías hacer lo que intentas pero hay que leer, creo que en ese file rc.local hay que poner iptables-restore tufile, saludos! saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53
There are not any problems. On my server: # rpm -qa | grep php php-pecl-memcache-3.0.5-3.el6.x86_64 php-xml-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-pear-1.9.4-4.el6.noarch php-pgsql-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-gd-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-soap-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-common-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-cli-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-mysql-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-xmlrpc-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-pecl-apc-3.1.3p1-1.2.el6.1.x86_64 php-ldap-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-pdo-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 php-odbc-5.3.3-3.el6_2.6.x86_64 On 16 April 2012 21:49, dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com wrote: I myself am running: httpd-2.2.22 php-5.2.17 mysql-server-5.1.58 from Jason Litka's (utterramblings) repo. http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ No issues here. D On 2012-04-16, at 3:18 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP rpms) to PHP53? Much thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53
On 04/17/2012 01:18 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What about the IUS repository listed here http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories ? IUS PHP packages list for 5: http://dl.iuscommunity.org/pub/ius/stable/Redhat/5/x86_64/repoview/development.languages.group.html If you have virtualization capabilities and depending on your PHP extension needs, you should give a try and compare with other repositories. -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53
it also available from ius community repo -- Eero 2012/4/17 dnk d.k.emailli...@gmail.com: I myself am running: httpd-2.2.22 php-5.2.17 mysql-server-5.1.58 from Jason Litka's (utterramblings) repo. http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ No issues here. D On 2012-04-16, at 3:18 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP rpms) to PHP53? Much thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration
Hi Karanbir, That's the thing, older (non pv-grub aware kernels) did used to map them with the old scsi device names, but here now it's still mapping them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so on. Upstream seem to have a handful of bugs related to dracut and initramfs creation but I don't think that's the case here but I'll look at it again. Cheers, Steph On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 00:00:48 +0100 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: On 04/16/2012 10:44 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: Does anyone have any similar experience or advice? because the devices are now mapped as sda/sdb instead of xvda/xvdb ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Steph Gosling st...@chuci.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53
On 04/16/2012 11:49 PM, dnk wrote: I myself am running: httpd-2.2.22 php-5.2.17 mysql-server-5.1.58 I want to point out here that 5.2.17 is the last release of the 5.2 branch and that it is NOT being updated for security by php.net any more. There are already unpatched vulnerabilities. The 5.1.x (and php53) versions from EL5 will continue to get security updates until EL5 goes EOL. If you have to use php-5.2.x then 5.2.17 is the one to use ... however, it is not safe. As to the question of what is different ... I think many 3rd party packages from repoforge and EPEL will not work well with php53 ... but if you are staying inside the php53 universe, it should be OK. from Jason Litka's (utterramblings) repo. http://www.jasonlitka.com/yum-repository/ No issues here. D On 2012-04-16, at 3:18 PM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP rpms) to PHP53? Much thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a ipfm RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5 ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm error: ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I probably missed something or am using some very outdated ressources: would some help me? -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a ipfm RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5 ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm error: ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I probably missed something or am using some very outdated ressources: would some help me? source packages are stored in the vault.centos.org repo. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
2012/4/17 Mihamina Rakotomandimby miham...@rktmb.org: Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a ipfm RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5 ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm error: ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I probably missed something or am using some very outdated ressources: would some help me? Hi, To rebuild you can use: $ rpmbuild --rebuild ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm First you need to follow those instructions: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SetupRpmBuildEnvironment Cheers, Fabien ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a ipfm RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5 ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm error: ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I probably missed something or am using some very outdated ressources: would some help me? That link is just the html page, not an SRPM .. when you wget it, you have downloaded the html code, not an SRPM. Go here and pick an SRPM link: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/26/dist/24/size/57543/name/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
On 04/17/2012 04:17 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 04/17/2012 09:14 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, I have installed the recommended installs from here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/RebuildSRPM I want to build a ipfm RPM on a CentOS 6.2, for legacy purpose. I cant immediately get rid of that piece of software, but we're on the move... So: $ wget http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/3/srodzaj/2/search/ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm $ rpm -i --nomd5 ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm error: ipfm-0.11.5-alt1.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package manifest): I probably missed something or am using some very outdated ressources: would some help me? I will point out that SRPM is for ALT linux, not CentOS .. who knows if it will compile on CentOS. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bridge connection and two linux servers
I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm describing it again. The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for management purposes. All request destined to BOX'2 IP will go through BOX 1. BOX1's IP will not be available to clients. another thing is the service running in BOX2's is very sensitive to nat like stuffs. primary natting for client is managed externally. but no packet header modification(in case of iptables -t nat) is desirable. On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Ken godee k...@perfect-image.com wrote: On 4/16/2012 8:04 AM, Arif Hossaiin wrote: I need to set up following network architecture : Internet ^ +-+ | +--+ | Centos6-1 | | | Centos6-2 | | + eth0 + + | | | (br0)| || | | + eth1 ++ eth0 | +-++--+ ( cable connection ) Two public IP's are to be configured like follows : + **eth0** and **eth1** of **Centos6-1 are to be configured as a bridge with IP1 - **Centos6-1** can be accessed with IP1 - **eth0** of **Centos6-2** is configured with IP2 - any request destined to IP2 will flow through **Centos6-1** How can i accomplish this feat? Not sure if I'm understanding this You're trying to present a service running on box 2 to the internet through box 1's public interface? (securely) If so I might have a look at this software http://www.delegate.org/delegate/ You'll be able to create a reverse proxy on box 1 to box 2 or any services running on your internal network, etc. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- -aft ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] packaging: src.rpm not a rpm
On 04/17/2012 12:17 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: source packages are stored in the vault.centos.org repo. Did not find, but I just discovered (by jus reading further with attention) that the source has a spec file: http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk?order=name Thank you very much! -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration
(bad form replying to myself) I've found the issue upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586 Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS upstream and don't see that one yet so a related question: how quickly do they release these or make them available for testing? Cheers, Steph -- Steph Gosling st...@chuci.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration
hi, Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies. On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so on. And labels dont help here ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 12:35:07 +0100 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote: hi, Please dont toppost, trim your reply and keep context in your replies. Apologies (mail sent before coffee this morning!) On 04/17/2012 08:04 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: them as 'xvdN' but N in this case is 'e', not 'a', 'f', not 'b' and so on. And labels dont help here ? Labels do help for the root device but not for ephemeral devices in EC2:- with an EC2 instance you'll know the label or UUID of the root device but ephemeral devices are created at startup time. This makes getting mountpoints right hard if you're programmatically starting instances difficult. There's also a 'mapping' between what the EC2 APIs return as the root device (helpfully still referred to via the old SCSI names), again which makes programmatic operations break: expecting something to be /dev/sda1 in EC2 that was /dev/xvda1 in the instance but magically now is /dev/xvde1. Anyway as I say it's definitely a problem with upstream so we'll just wait and see. Just explaining this here so that the search engines get it and it'll hopefully help someone else with the same problem in the future. Cheers, Steph -- Steph Gosling st...@chuci.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x, kernel-2.6.32-220.7.1, EC2 and drive enumeration
On 04/17/2012 06:27 AM, Steph Gosling wrote: (bad form replying to myself) I've found the issue upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729586 Last comment there saying there are patches in an as yet unreleased kernel-2.6.32-229.el6. I've had a quick look at the SRPMS upstream and don't see that one yet so a related question: how quickly do they release these or make them available for testing? They usually do not make them available for testing anymore ... and if they do, it is usually a link from the bugzilla page and likely for a limited time. (Thanks Oracle) Since it is a 229 version, I would think it will be released at the next point release ... so for 6.3 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bridge connection and two linux servers
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:07:36 +0600 Arif Hossain aft...@gmail.com wrote: I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm describing it again. The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for management purposes. You're looking for a bridging firewall, it probably should look like this: ++ +-- internet line | box1 | | || | ++ | eth2---bad-+ | box2 | | |br| | || | eth1--good---eth1 | || || | eth0--+--eth0 | ||||| ++|++ | lan eth0 is the (optional) internal management network you'll need the following configurations on box1: In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0 DEVICE=br0 TYPE=Bridge ONBOOT=yes DELAY=0 BOOTPROTO=none In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=MAC ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2 DEVICE=eth2 HWADDR=MAC ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 Restart your networking: service network restart Verify the bridge is set up: brctl show You probably want to netfilter your br0 device, I recommend shorewall: Here is a short example. I'll put eth1 in zone good and eth2 in zone bad. eth0 will be in zone loc. I will allow all outgoing traffic from box2 to the internet and filter all incoming except for https and icmp ping. This example requires shorewall 4.0. This example is for ipv4 only, ipv6 requires shorewall6. In /etc/shorewall/interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS # Your isp inetbr0 - bridge,proxyarp,routefilter bad br0:eth2- physical=eth2 goodbr0:eth1- physical=eth1 # local network loc eth0detect routeback In /etc/shorewall/zones #ZONE TYPE fw firewall loc ipv4 inetipv4 bad:inetbport good:inet bport #END In /etc/shorewall/policy #SOURCE DESTPOLICY LOG # allow local to firewall and vice versa loc fw ACCEPT fw loc ACCEPT # the next line allows all outgoing (from good to bad) traffic. # you can also reject outgoing traffic and set single allow rules in # the file /etc/shorewall/rules (see below) goodbad ACCEPT # drop all other bad all DROP info all all DROP info #END In /etc/shorewall/rules #ACTION SOURCE DESTPROTO DEST # e.g. allow ping and https only for public ip (1.2.3.4) ACCEPT bad good:1.2.3.4tcp https ACCEPT bad good:1.2.3.4icmp8 #END -- Freundliche Gruesse/Best Regards Benjamin Hackl IT/Administration Media FOCUS Research Ges.m.b.H. Maculangasse 8, 1220 Wien Austria Tel: +43 1 258 97 01-295 b.ha...@focusmr.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53
On 04/17/2012 12:18 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP rpms) to PHP53? We have been using php53 on all of our centos5 servers for severeal months, now. No major problem at all. Just set the timezone in /etc/php.ini. Much thanks, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Bye, Peter -- Peter Hopfgartner web : http://www.r3-gis.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bridge connection and two linux servers
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:54 PM, Benjamin Hackl b.ha...@focusmr.com wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:07:36 +0600 Arif Hossain aft...@gmail.com wrote: I think i've failed to describe what i'm trying to do. So i'm describing it again. The client will send request to the BOX2's IP. BOX1's IP used only for management purposes. You're looking for a bridging firewall, it probably should look like this: ++ +-- internet line | box1 | | || | ++ | eth2---bad-+ | box2 | | |br| | || | eth1--good---eth1 | || || | eth0--+--eth0 | ||||| ++|++ | lan eth0 is the (optional) internal management network you'll need the following configurations on box1: In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-br0 DEVICE=br0 TYPE=Bridge ONBOOT=yes DELAY=0 BOOTPROTO=none In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1 DEVICE=eth1 HWADDR=MAC ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 In /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth2 DEVICE=eth2 HWADDR=MAC ONBOOT=yes BRIDGE=br0 Restart your networking: service network restart Verify the bridge is set up: brctl show You probably want to netfilter your br0 device, I recommend shorewall: Here is a short example. I'll put eth1 in zone good and eth2 in zone bad. eth0 will be in zone loc. I will allow all outgoing traffic from box2 to the internet and filter all incoming except for https and icmp ping. This example requires shorewall 4.0. This example is for ipv4 only, ipv6 requires shorewall6. In /etc/shorewall/interfaces #ZONE INTERFACE BROADCAST OPTIONS # Your isp inetbr0 - bridge,proxyarp,routefilter bad br0:eth2- physical=eth2 goodbr0:eth1- physical=eth1 # local network loc eth0detect routeback In /etc/shorewall/zones #ZONE TYPE fw firewall loc ipv4 inetipv4 bad:inetbport good:inet bport #END In /etc/shorewall/policy #SOURCE DESTPOLICY LOG # allow local to firewall and vice versa loc fw ACCEPT fw loc ACCEPT # the next line allows all outgoing (from good to bad) traffic. # you can also reject outgoing traffic and set single allow rules in # the file /etc/shorewall/rules (see below) goodbad ACCEPT # drop all other bad all DROP info all all DROP info #END In /etc/shorewall/rules #ACTION SOURCE DESTPROTO DEST # e.g. allow ping and https only for public ip (1.2.3.4) ACCEPT bad good:1.2.3.4tcp https ACCEPT bad good:1.2.3.4icmp8 #END thanks for the reply. i will try your solution and post results ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53 on CentOS5
On 04/17/2012 12:18 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: Greetings, We have someone requesting the use of Wordpress 3.3.1. It requires PHP 5.2 minimum. Currently, our machine is running CentOS 5.7. What are the issues/concerns in upgrading from PHP 5.1 (the current PHP rpms) to PHP53? We have been using php53 on all of our centos5 servers for severeal months, now. No major problem at all. Just set the timezone in /etc/php.ini. Much thanks for all of the replies. My sense, then, from all of the replies is that on CentoOS5, given the need for it, you upgrade to PHP53. In running a yum update, how do you do it? Is it just a straight # yum update php\* ?? Much thanks, [recycle] Max Pyziur p...@brama.com [recycle] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Bye, Peter -- Peter Hopfgartner web : http://www.r3-gis.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53 on CentOS5
-Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Max Pyziur Sent: 17 April 2012 16:03 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] PHP and PHP53 on CentOS5 Much thanks for all of the replies. My sense, then, from all of the replies is that on CentoOS5, given the need for it, you upgrade to PHP53. In running a yum update, how do you do it? Is it just a straight # yum update php\* php and php53 are separate packages, so you would have to remove the php packages and run yum install php53. Chances are yum may just remove php then upon installation of php53 This email has been sent from Gala Coral Group Limited (GCG) or a subsidiary or associated company. GCG is registered in England with company number 07254686. Registered office address: 71 Queensway, London W2 4QH, United Kingdom; website: www.galacoral.com. This e-mail message (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain privileged and/or proprietorial information protected by legal rules. It is for use by the intended addressee only. If you believe you are not the intended recipient or that the sender is not authorised to send you the email, please return it to the sender (and please copy it to h...@galacoral.com) and then delete it from your computer. You should not otherwise copy or disclose its contents to anyone. Except where this email is sent in the usual course of business, the views expressed are those of the sender and not necessarily ours. We reserve the right to monitor all emails sent to and from our businesses, to protect the businesses and to ensure compliance with internal policies. Emails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error-free, as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, and may contain viruses; anyone who communicates with us by email is taken to accept these risks. GCG accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] auth_changepassword Resolved !!
Dear Markus Falb, This is to update that poller.php can now create rrd files. It was not creating due to the cause that community was mismatch. there was community configured in /etc/smnp/snmpd.conf community is to specified in the settings on main page after we have login to the cacti through URL. Well done guys. Thanks to everyone. Prabhpal Dear Markus Falb, Thanks for your response, the problem has been resolved. It was due to document root directive. DocumentRoot was /var/www/html/ whereas cacti folder was located at following /var/www/html/cacti. which seems correct and should have work. Apache was finding auth_changepassword.php under DocumentRoot (html directory). change the document root to as following /var/www/html/cacti fixed the problem. everything is fine but there are other little problems. poller is unable to generate rrd files. etc, anyways. Thanks for your support. Prabhpal On 14.4.2012 12:09, Prabhpal S. Mavi wrote: i installed cacti on CentOS 6.2. every thing went smooth and i can see the login page as well. due to security reason cacti has to change the default password (admin/admin) when i enter the default password i get the following error. The requested URL /auth_changepassword.php was not found on this server. First I would look in apache's access and error log. That could give you a hint where to look further. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thanks / Regards Prabhpal S. Mavi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Building RPM, Unknown tag Licence Copyright
Hi all, When trying to rpmbuild http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk/redhat/ipfm.spec, I do this: [mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ rpmbuild -ba ipfm.spec error: line 5: Unknown tag: Licence: GPL And I get the error above. [mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ head -n 5 ipfm.spec Summary: IP Flow Meter is a bandwidth analysis tool Name: ipfm Version: 0.12.0rc1 Release: rktmb Licence: GPL [mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ There, I changed the original Copyright: to Licence:, but I get the same error with Copyright: (but mentioning Copyright:). http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html says Licence: is a valid tag. Isnt'it? These are my rpm installed. [mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ rpm -aq | grep rpm rpm-python-4.8.0-19.el6_2.1.x86_64 deltarpm-3.5-0.5.20090913git.el6.x86_64 rpm-4.8.0-19.el6_2.1.x86_64 rpm-build-4.8.0-19.el6_2.1.x86_64 redhat-rpm-config-9.0.3-34.el6.noarch rpm-libs-4.8.0-19.el6_2.1.x86_64 Thank you. -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Building RPM, Unknown tag Licence Copyright
On 17.4.2012 21:40, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: When trying to rpmbuild http://robert.cheramy.net/ipfm/browser/trunk/redhat/ipfm.spec, I do this: [mihamina@centos6-01 redhat]$ rpmbuild -ba ipfm.spec error: line 5: Unknown tag: Licence: GPL The error message is telling you that you made a typo. http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html says Licence: is a valid tag. Isnt'it? License: were a valid tag. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS
5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170.
A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped
responding to NFS requests for two minutes every half an hour (approx).
Let's call this the hang. It has been doing this for four days now.
There are no log messages of any kind pertaining to this. The other three
servers are fine, although they are less loaded. Between hangs,
performance is excellent. Load is more or less constant, not peaky.
NFS clients do get the usual not responding, still trying message during
a hang.
There are no cron or other jobs that launch every half an hour.
All hardware on the affected server seems to be good. Disk volumes being
served are RAID-5 sets with write-back cache enabled (BBU is good). RAID
controller logs are free of errors.
NFS servers used dual bonded gigabit links in balance-alb mode. Turning
off one interface in the bond made no difference.
Relevant /etc/sysctl.conf parameters:
vm.dirty_ratio = 50
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 1
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 1000
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 100
vm.min_free_kbytes = 65536
net.core.rmem_default = 262144
net.core.rmem_max = 262144
net.core.wmem_default = 262144
net.core.wmem_max = 262144
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 25000
net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 127
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 8192
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1
The {r,w}mem_{max,default} values are twice what they were previously;
changing these had no effect.
The number of dirty pages is nowhere near the dirty_ratio when the hangs
occur; there may be only 50MB of dirty memory.
A local process on the NFS server is reading from disk at around 40-50
MB/sec on average; this continues unaffected during the hang, as do all
other network services on the host (eg an LDAP server). During the hang
the server seems to be quite snappy in all respects apart from NFS. The
network itself is fine as far as I can tell, and all NFS-related processes
on the server are intact.
NFS mounts on clients are made with UDP or TCP with no difference in
results. A client mount cannot be completed (timed out) and access to an
already NFS mounted volume stalls during the hang (both automounted and
manual mounts).
NFS block size is 32768 r and w; using 16384 makes no difference.
Tcpdump shows no NFS packets exchanged between client and server during a
hang.
I have not rebooted the affected server yet, but I have restarted NFS
with no change.
Help! I cannot figure out what is wrong, and I cannot find anything amiss.
I'm running out of something but I don't know what it is (except perhaps
brains). Hints, please!
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Apr 17, 2012, at 5:40 PM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
I have four NFS servers running on Dell hardware (PE2900) under CentOS
5.7, x86_64. The number of NFS clients is about 170.
A few days ago, one of the four, with no apparent changes, stopped
responding to NFS requests for two minutes every half an hour (approx).
Let's call this the hang. It has been doing this for four days now.
There are no log messages of any kind pertaining to this. The other three
servers are fine, although they are less loaded. Between hangs,
performance is excellent. Load is more or less constant, not peaky.
NFS clients do get the usual not responding, still trying message during
a hang.
There are no cron or other jobs that launch every half an hour.
All hardware on the affected server seems to be good. Disk volumes being
served are RAID-5 sets with write-back cache enabled (BBU is good). RAID
controller logs are free of errors.
NFS servers used dual bonded gigabit links in balance-alb mode. Turning
off one interface in the bond made no difference.
Relevant /etc/sysctl.conf parameters:
vm.dirty_ratio = 50
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 1
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 1000
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 100
vm.min_free_kbytes = 65536
net.core.rmem_default = 262144
net.core.rmem_max = 262144
net.core.wmem_default = 262144
net.core.wmem_max = 262144
net.core.netdev_max_backlog = 25000
net.ipv4.tcp_reordering = 127
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 4096 65536 16777216
net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog = 8192
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1
The {r,w}mem_{max,default} values are twice what they were previously;
changing these had no effect.
The number of dirty pages is nowhere near the dirty_ratio when the hangs
occur; there may be only 50MB of dirty memory.
A local process on the NFS server is reading from disk at around 40-50
MB/sec on average; this continues unaffected during the hang, as do all
other network services on the host (eg an LDAP server). During the hang
the server seems to be quite snappy in all respects apart from NFS. The
network itself is fine as far as I can tell, and all NFS-related processes
on the server are intact.
NFS mounts on clients are made with UDP or TCP with no difference in
results. A client mount cannot be completed (timed out) and access to an
already NFS mounted volume stalls during the hang (both automounted and
manual mounts).
NFS block size is 32768 r and w; using 16384 makes no difference.
Tcpdump shows no NFS packets exchanged between client and server during a
hang.
I have not rebooted the affected server yet, but I have restarted NFS
with no change.
Help! I cannot figure out what is wrong, and I cannot find anything amiss.
I'm running out of something but I don't know what it is (except perhaps
brains). Hints, please!
Just a shot in the dark here.
Take a look at the NIC and switch port flow control status during an outage,
they may be paused due to switch load.
Is there anything else on the network switches that might flood them every half
hour for a two minute duration?
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:49 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote: Just a shot in the dark here. Take a look at the NIC and switch port flow control status during an outage, they may be paused due to switch load. Is there anything else on the network switches that might flood them every half hour for a two minute duration? Let me also add that constant spanning tree convergence can cause this too. Make sure your choice of protocol and priority suit your topology and equipment. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote: Take a look at the NIC and switch port flow control status during an outage, they may be paused due to switch load. Is there anything else on the network switches that might flood them every half hour for a two minute duration? Unfortunately not. All of the NFS servers are on the same switch (an HP procurve) and only the one is having issues. The hang is always the same length, too. Nice try though! Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
Also shot in the dark from me. There maybe some IP conflict in the network. Sent from my iPhone ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote: Let me also add that constant spanning tree convergence can cause this too. Make sure your choice of protocol and priority suit your topology and equipment. Gives me an idea! The switch is under control of different people. I did have a new VLAN created for an unrelated purpose two days before this all started. Hmmm... Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Fajar Priyanto wrote: Also shot in the dark from me. There maybe some IP conflict in the network. Yes, I thought of that one too. I am in control of all IP's on the network, so I am sure that nothing changed around the time that the trouble started. I checked for that anyway :-( Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SSD as system drive - partitioning question
I mentioned here the other day that I was planning to set up a Centos 6 system using a SSD for the system drive and a regular hard drive for a data drive. My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /home on the regular hard drive. Now that I'm at the stage of actually setting this up I have discovered that I don't understand enough about drive partitioning to make this work the way that I want it to. Perhaps I'm missing something obvious. I could create separate partitions on the SSD for /lib, /bin and everything else that I want to put there, then put / on the hard drive, but I would really prefer to put /boot and one other partition on the SSD, and one partition on the hard drive. How can I tell the system that I want /bin and friends on the SSD and /home and /var on the hard drive, but still have just one partition on each drive (plus /boot on the SSD)? If I create / on the hard drive and /ssd on the SSD, then putting bin on the SSD would make it /ssd/bin and that would obviously not be what I want to see. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSD as system drive - partitioning question
Well, /boot by default, is always a primary partition. CentOS (and RedHat) like to create a logical volume manager (LVM) on a separate primary partition, and typically inside the LVM one can create and modify the rest of the various partitions. You do have the flexibility to create TWO LVM's. You can place one LVM on a primary partition on the SSD, and the other on the hard drive. From within both LVM's you can create your partitions to your heart's content. Or for your SSD configuration, don't bother creating an LVM for that. You can use up to 4 primary partition per storage device (and lots of secondary partitions). So, since you only want to place two partitions total on the SSD, simply create those two primary partitions and utilize them. === Al From: Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com To: centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 3:40 PM Subject: [CentOS] SSD as system drive - partitioning question I mentioned here the other day that I was planning to set up a Centos 6 system using a SSD for the system drive and a regular hard drive for a data drive. My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /home on the regular hard drive. Now that I'm at the stage of actually setting this up I have discovered that I don't understand enough about drive partitioning to make this work the way that I want it to. Perhaps I'm missing something obvious. I could create separate partitions on the SSD for /lib, /bin and everything else that I want to put there, then put / on the hard drive, but I would really prefer to put /boot and one other partition on the SSD, and one partition on the hard drive. How can I tell the system that I want /bin and friends on the SSD and /home and /var on the hard drive, but still have just one partition on each drive (plus /boot on the SSD)? If I create / on the hard drive and /ssd on the SSD, then putting bin on the SSD would make it /ssd/bin and that would obviously not be what I want to see. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSD as system drive - partitioning question
On 04/17/2012 06:40 PM, Frank Cox wrote: I mentioned here the other day that I was planning to set up a Centos 6 system using a SSD for the system drive and a regular hard drive for a data drive. My plan is to have everything that doesn't change (much) on the SSD, such as /boot, /lib, /bin and so on. I want to put /tmp and /var and /home on the regular hard drive. Now that I'm at the stage of actually setting this up I have discovered that I don't understand enough about drive partitioning to make this work the way that I want it to. Perhaps I'm missing something obvious. I could create separate partitions on the SSD for /lib, /bin and everything else that I want to put there, then put / on the hard drive, but I would really prefer to put /boot and one other partition on the SSD, and one partition on the hard drive. You're going to find it very difficult to separate /lib and /bin from the root file system. When the kernel starts up, it has just the root file system. How can it execute the mount command to gain access to /lib and /bin when the mount command and the libraries it needs are on a file system that has not yet been mounted? It's far more straightforward and more maintainable to put the root file system on the SSD and put /tmp, /var, and /home on the regular drive. Most writes to the root file system (other than root's home directory) occur only during configuration changes (file system mounts/umounts, network link starts/stops, modifying printers, ...) and much of that could be moved off of the root file system with judicious use of symlinks. I just now ran the 'find' command to see what on the root file system had a time stamp more recent than the time of the last boot (10 days ago, BTW) and filtering out root's home directory and mount point directories and there was almost nothing. About the only thing that would be any challenge to symlink away would be /etc/mtab, and it's going to be awfully hard to wear out an SSD with a file that gets written once for each mount or umount. -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Help needed with NFS issue
On Apr 17, 2012, at 6:57 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Ross Walker wrote: Let me also add that constant spanning tree convergence can cause this too. Make sure your choice of protocol and priority suit your topology and equipment. Gives me an idea! The switch is under control of different people. I did have a new VLAN created for an unrelated purpose two days before this all started. Hmmm... Maybe one of the ports of the bonded interfaces was assigned to this vlan causing LACP to break. -Ross ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Building RPM, Unknown tag Licence Copyright
On 04/17/2012 11:11 PM, Markus Falb wrote: The error message is telling you that you made a typo. http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html says Licence: is a valid tag. Isnt'it? License: were a valid tag. Oh my god, a typo... t... Thank you Markus. -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
