[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0509 Moderate CentOS 6 wireshark Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0509 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0509.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
12b6fefeaee07dc4f84110f2ff66e66bb6774126dcecc5e0e672c4d9ba64b077
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
0a85aa2c82986479e5eb55e6918d84d664c8af4bab6fe921f28e2e59fc590f56
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
8ab9026910b899d1e2071d97dea4a15dd3ee1868121defa8c0f6bd5441c7455b
wireshark-gnome-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
12b6fefeaee07dc4f84110f2ff66e66bb6774126dcecc5e0e672c4d9ba64b077
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
f3353c8677ccb128eb06be6ebbb1ea5dfc3084c176daa0ef558a1b2f35dae9aa
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
0a85aa2c82986479e5eb55e6918d84d664c8af4bab6fe921f28e2e59fc590f56
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
3fc3a7e6bff12511b4dbca45d502123951fe668e90caee7518ea0493265183cd
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
b9e73d61563e32d94f4bd73d139aba9986796ee6f25bb40887854be7b64e95ab
wireshark-gnome-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fcec8718aa049adbb5d3071754f19dc0ab494b3d9e359e7c460c33c86800f08d
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0518 Important CentOS 5 openssl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0518 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0518.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d8e4fe4b31be6324ed03ad70d86156a3168efc55c5b06ffd4fde486feb9fe2d6
openssl097a-0.9.7a-11.el5_8.2.i386.rpm
c65df6dec7b008e84ab414c6970fb2c409a5e00cba23a4a4350b1a716b229559
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
586a15a6bc19278bee19a2572bd1bc788003ff4c198431d0f4663adbb1b3184c
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i686.rpm
639974e459e9f6c0403360fc41067f48394f512d0ba5e579ea45b8992d2da168
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
92a492519329325336183c23929df620c8f8ddfd0e82b10c57664ec6d55e7bad
openssl-perl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
x86_64:
d8e4fe4b31be6324ed03ad70d86156a3168efc55c5b06ffd4fde486feb9fe2d6
openssl097a-0.9.7a-11.el5_8.2.i386.rpm
7fa89e3ca44626a62c98bc84be77959f66a9b8eba6bbb9fd98365e74e6e103aa
openssl097a-0.9.7a-11.el5_8.2.x86_64.rpm
586a15a6bc19278bee19a2572bd1bc788003ff4c198431d0f4663adbb1b3184c
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i686.rpm
a5492f5973452f6193a3fb6cd3249f2791c52cebd1e1d12560d2d64b256c2784
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm
639974e459e9f6c0403360fc41067f48394f512d0ba5e579ea45b8992d2da168
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
f2bd64faebbd7b5dc0124cca14b217ace539e04913f9eb266e8c2274b7dc94b8
openssl-devel-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm
75c9372cf9aa77e8d245254b3696b56d6bed262f3245e8c95278a07e74ffb42c
openssl-perl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d152bcff32227dd08cc0495718cfd19ad3ca2e1c15011ae41dc9ef0f434d4176
openssl097a-0.9.7a-11.el5_8.2.src.rpm
63492a08a2e0cd5277925dc88d34a85a381bd4c087787715e57645008a5bbace
openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0515 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0515 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0515.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c2e589aadfac0a7c5977431242a268743d4a223c4da6cab73919c0af8cba3278
firefox-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
eaa1f4d40f40f2c20310a7234a80d643dfd3cf6124a38466dfe700581f166304
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
67a66eb67a74646e261340123f32fc604ae072feb475674a86532b30deaec4e4
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
x86_64:
c2e589aadfac0a7c5977431242a268743d4a223c4da6cab73919c0af8cba3278
firefox-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
9f1a1179d341db3846865cb0c7e39a2a9e23c3e06067760ebeb07090f20ba9c0
firefox-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
eaa1f4d40f40f2c20310a7234a80d643dfd3cf6124a38466dfe700581f166304
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
aa76e67d4a67b6c919176f37906b224ef0bcf4217ec2995b121528c594557cd3
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
67a66eb67a74646e261340123f32fc604ae072feb475674a86532b30deaec4e4
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el5_8.i386.rpm
f34186000619626cb784b3f7a916bddd1b7416e6b731ef04842788ca797e64fd
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
Source:
1fbc0bd8c0045baeb7e75a8a5162752b0b4c0253e96cacc22cc426f5351a3b33
firefox-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
be2954b3d1a4f9309fb097188d0bcd684985f2c62801bcaf4b0ed224f672abcb
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el5_8.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0516 Critical CentOS 5 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f9867946d381c189979c309151f633bc51596909c160dbc03e5324582d664c20
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
e67a3cc7f4319d39d9b23e59b03113224bd9ffaec8ed7ac76081211ce16a27c0
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
be26754c255f7058be311dad0c8b0a7d515f6b20b6f0d50f4372a796db682d53
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0516 Critical CentOS 5 thunderbird Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
f9867946d381c189979c309151f633bc51596909c160dbc03e5324582d664c20
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
e67a3cc7f4319d39d9b23e59b03113224bd9ffaec8ed7ac76081211ce16a27c0
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
be26754c255f7058be311dad0c8b0a7d515f6b20b6f0d50f4372a796db682d53
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0518 Important CentOS 6 openssl Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0518 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0518.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
862142d2d7adc74311d7312c6ace396d36b6c8f3a0708f6fe5e0d3977d00a871
openssl098e-0.9.8e-17.el6.centos.2.i686.rpm
daf42680787be3dd52f60869192546aee755b30d52ce41c60a42c22b5b866598
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
c9f5d447c6ceb802f584ec00f9471aad9dc9b07aaee8752c93628bb85fed6d22
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
505cd20ca28023c5a57c21a77d27579cf86c89681aecad05b1390940ae04acc7
openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
3dc7e1d025072910603c70f6bda6b2216d3696c1cc53addd4aae7e1b583bc412
openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
x86_64:
862142d2d7adc74311d7312c6ace396d36b6c8f3a0708f6fe5e0d3977d00a871
openssl098e-0.9.8e-17.el6.centos.2.i686.rpm
4ac567e5fc400f82b311571087f6417d31d676815e155fec38e8d96bb907a802
openssl098e-0.9.8e-17.el6.centos.2.x86_64.rpm
daf42680787be3dd52f60869192546aee755b30d52ce41c60a42c22b5b866598
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
9d2811144333229d55cd71980149263759ca9f8346474b8d3c4627161a8fa04c
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.x86_64.rpm
c9f5d447c6ceb802f584ec00f9471aad9dc9b07aaee8752c93628bb85fed6d22
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.i686.rpm
3153ad264e69f4732bf71bb4604ed5ef4a986e4561b4263293cf5f2e2fcb74a5
openssl-devel-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.x86_64.rpm
d06f9dc55d37dac891bc23e5b71168ba0b37363946427776ee32e8077d7734ac
openssl-perl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.x86_64.rpm
616be1df741f82ca6afe041aaefbd440c4f9281bdbf13778b807a6c5dce48d18
openssl-static-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cb47c1a6274027b8eda9650022c6bfd0b929a47ab2790a4e5e32727283c458a0
openssl098e-0.9.8e-17.el6.centos.2.src.rpm
f361d1cbcf6503f7c01b5f7bb0214f7e6565958953c171d06776c2d234f96c8b
openssl-1.0.0-20.el6_2.4.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0515 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0515 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0515.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c4bebcb3117bbdea4a7939a051fec485d87151279d39dd84b0c66b6d291a05a1
firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
f63bfb4c5ba1b6b5fdbea118bbfa319f89ad5e52b89ec0cc5b3e37500defce22
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
57283c431e56e9a856a2e6cc995d14f259019bdfb05d97a75520390f5c52f482
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
c4bebcb3117bbdea4a7939a051fec485d87151279d39dd84b0c66b6d291a05a1
firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
26094a0b00b916faf0360030a2e301b117e654e622ce9391b4e6af652a827a0e
firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
f63bfb4c5ba1b6b5fdbea118bbfa319f89ad5e52b89ec0cc5b3e37500defce22
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
f2c2b66c6791cf65198705aba1105c23690a7bc33a244908aec00c0704a7cd08
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
57283c431e56e9a856a2e6cc995d14f259019bdfb05d97a75520390f5c52f482
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
e936e7f8ad309cc2a0e748f84b535cb2b5b4edd9c9600d0a030679a456d2d38c
xulrunner-devel-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0603cdfaf29ccdc932d7de7778b7f0243a1fe7dacf46edc9a09434617163cf94
firefox-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.src.rpm
411461e337e97bc3de9a837831f2e8c4a3531d85f4e1e4e8d0f88779ed950e9b
xulrunner-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0516 Critical CentOS 6 thunderbird Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0516 Critical
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0516.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
51c96b168750b8d67c4c00d476db97a48211a49f7e2b5c88fb9d66050e4e8878
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
27be19a649c955a25f32d67ac66d74fc52408b8c946d37038f85a834d24b0a9a
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
839879961dac3b265a953d606bda9daed84a34391b09113915ca7cadf4b51952
thunderbird-10.0.4-1.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] no accedo a swat via web
hola tengo habilitado la herramienta swat en centos 6.2 para configurar samba pero a la hora de tratar acceder via el explorador mozila,no abre.e inclusive deshabilite selinux pero ni aun asi responde saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] no accedo a swat via web
Hola!!! Has comprobado que están en funcionamiento oos servicios que necesitas? httpd etc El 24/04/2012 20:25, Ignacio Ordeñana ifor1...@gmail.com escribió: hola tengo habilitado la herramienta swat en centos 6.2 para configurar samba pero a la hora de tratar acceder via el explorador mozila,no abre.e inclusive deshabilite selinux pero ni aun asi responde saludos ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use case LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs / tutorials for CentOS available? You dont need rpms: the libvirt directly use the LXC API. A tutorial: http://goo.gl/kQOxm All you need is to - setup the XML - define a VM from it - start the VM No more, for the basic example. Really fun. Of course, when you need a custom environment, you'll need to read further: but it's still fun :-) -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] problems with PV snapshots
On 4/24/12 12:05 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: On 04/23/2012 03:44 AM, James A. Peltier wrote: | pvs |Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using | /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi |PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree |/dev/mapper/mpathk NetCluster0 lvm2 a--1.67t 1020.00m | snip HINT: You'll need to generate a new UUID/rename the PV. (pvchange -u) I suggest to first backup original UUID to some file, then change it. It might be needed. the main problem is that the volumes I am talking about are clustered volumes and even umounting them give me troubles because looks liek I Cannot change uuid on a clustered LVM... pvchange -u /dev/mapper/mpathk Found duplicate PV 46dU6F2rU9xqqOaWf8eihFwbdGp672lS: using /dev/mapper/mpathh not /dev/mapper/mpathk Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi Unable to find /dev/mapper/mpathk in NetCluster0 0 physical volumes changed / 0 physical volumes not changed Internal error: Volume Group NetCluster0 was not unlocked Device '/dev/mapper/mpathh' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathk' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathh' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathk' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathk' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathk' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathh' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathh' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathk' has been left open. Device '/dev/mapper/mpathh' has been left open. You have a memory leak (not released memory pool): [0x1de12a0] format_instance [0x1de59e0] read_vg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] problems with PV snapshots
hte main problem is that when I use pvchange -u it refuses to make operation to clsutered volume Volume Groups with the clustered attribute will be inaccessible. Found duplicate PV 46dU6F2rU9xqqOaWf8eihFwbdGp672lS: using /dev/mapper/mpathh not /dev/mapper/mpathk Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi Skipping clustered volume group NetCluster0 0 physical volumes changed / 0 physical volumes not changed is there a way to remove the cluster bit from the volume itself ? thanks Rick On 4/23/12 3:44 AM, James A. Peltier wrote: - Original Message - | Hello, | I have a Centos 6.2 clsuter with a CLVM partition on which I have a | GFS2 | file system. | The problem rises when I make a snapshot from my FC NetAPP FAS2020. | After I make the snapshot (it is a rw snapshot) of my LUN, I am not | able | to mount it from any of my cluster nodes, | because the Physical Volume is seen two times one time on the | standard | LVM partition | and the other time on the snapshot partition so te PV is foudn to be | duplicate and I cannot mount it. | | pvs |Found duplicate PV 5ZTDCmWHDH6M04nl58Wyyi3nYG8BOCRo: using | /dev/mapper/mpathl not /dev/mapper/mpathi |PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree |/dev/mapper/mpathk NetCluster0 lvm2 a--1.67t 1020.00m | | | I need a hint on how to fix this problem. I need to access the | snaphot | volume to backup my data but I am unable to do it... | | thank you very much HINT: You'll need to generate a new UUID/rename the PV. (pvchange -u) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken
On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote: I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces. dmesg says: bnx2: Can't load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing). ... What I don't understand is: I have an identical machine that I installed under 6.2 a while back, and kept up to date, and it doesn't have this problem. However, it tells me it uses version v2.1.11 (July 20, 2011) of the driver, how is that possible? This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package). If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel package. /Peter signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On 04/24/2012 05:38 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 04/23/12 8:31 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: um, LVM can't see over 2TB of the drive either, unless its formatted GPT, whereupon it can't be used as a boot device on a non-EFI system. The idea is to create multiple 2TB partitions. In one specific case I set up a 4TB System by creating a 1G boot volume and 3.99T system volume. Then I created two 2T partitions on the system volume, formatted them as physical volumes and added them to the main volume group. Then you can create a 4T logical volume if you like. how do I create two disks from one 3TB JBOD ? I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two partitions I guess. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
On 04/24/2012 11:58 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 04/23/2012 06:44 PM, Peter Peltonen wrote: I would add some LXC pins for quick ehanced chroot, depending on the use case LXC sounds interesting: are there any yum repositries / RPMs / tutorials for CentOS available? You dont need rpms: the libvirt directly use the LXC API. A tutorial: http://goo.gl/kQOxm All you need is to - setup the XML - define a VM from it - start the VM No more, for the basic example. Really fun. Of course, when you need a custom environment, you'll need to read further: but it's still fun :-) Remember that currently LXC isn't very secure (as mentioned in the tutorial link) so you probably don't want to use it for important stuff in a production environment. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] About audit2allow generated rules
HI
I have something in /var/log/audit/audit.log like:
avc: denied { write } for pid=23739 comm=httpd name=renderd.sock
dev=dm-0 ino=1183752 scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:var_run_t:s0 tclass=sock_file
use audit2allow it generates something like this:
allow httpd_t var_run_t:sock_file write;
Is the rule too liberal? that means httpd_t can write any var_run_t 's
sock_file?
Or I miss-understand something?
Should it only allow httpd_t to write this specific render.sock file?
If so, what's the right way to do?
Thanks.
min
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken
Peter Kjellstr??m writes: On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote: I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces. dmesg says: bnx2: Can't load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing). Looks like a vanilla kernel bug. http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268 This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package). Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed. If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel package. Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of kmod-cnic, which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Latest 6.2 kernel is broken
On 24/04/12 15:56, Lars Hecking wrote: Peter Kjellstr??m writes: On Monday 23 April 2012 17.54.33 Lars Hecking wrote: I just kickstarted a new machine with the latest CentOS 6.2 files, including kernel 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64. It came up without network interfaces. dmesg says: bnx2: Can't load firmware file bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw This is because you have the kmod-bnx2 package which contains a newer driver (2.2.1) but not a complete set of firmwares (two out of five files missing). Looks like a vanilla kernel bug. http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/17/268 This machine is using the normal bnx2 driver (2.1.11) for which there is a complete set of firmwares (provided by the kernel-firmware package). Spot on - the working machine did not have kmod-bnx2 installed. If you don't need the 2.2.1 driver I suggest you remove the kmod-bnx2 package from the first machine and fall back to the driver in the normal kernel package. Installing without kmod-bnx2 worked, and I also had to get rid of kmod-cnic, which /tmp/yum.log listed as requiring kmod-bnx2. This is fixed in RHEL6.3 (beta) where the kernel-firmware package contains the latest firmware that you are missing above: $ rpm -q kernel-firmware kernel-firmware-2.6.32-262.el6.noarch $ rpm -ql kernel-firmware | grep bnx2-mips /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-5.0.0.j6.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.0.15.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.1.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-06-6.2.3.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j15.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-5.0.0.j3.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.0.17.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1a.fw /lib/firmware/bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw In the meantime (as a workaround), just grab the missing firmware and place it in the appropriate directory. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 86, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2012:0509 Moderate CentOS 6 wireshark Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:27:48 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0509 Moderate CentOS 6 wireshark
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120424142748.ga3...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0509 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0509.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
12b6fefeaee07dc4f84110f2ff66e66bb6774126dcecc5e0e672c4d9ba64b077
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
0a85aa2c82986479e5eb55e6918d84d664c8af4bab6fe921f28e2e59fc590f56
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
8ab9026910b899d1e2071d97dea4a15dd3ee1868121defa8c0f6bd5441c7455b
wireshark-gnome-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
12b6fefeaee07dc4f84110f2ff66e66bb6774126dcecc5e0e672c4d9ba64b077
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
f3353c8677ccb128eb06be6ebbb1ea5dfc3084c176daa0ef558a1b2f35dae9aa
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
0a85aa2c82986479e5eb55e6918d84d664c8af4bab6fe921f28e2e59fc590f56
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.i686.rpm
3fc3a7e6bff12511b4dbca45d502123951fe668e90caee7518ea0493265183cd
wireshark-devel-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
b9e73d61563e32d94f4bd73d139aba9986796ee6f25bb40887854be7b64e95ab
wireshark-gnome-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fcec8718aa049adbb5d3071754f19dc0ab494b3d9e359e7c460c33c86800f08d
wireshark-1.2.15-2.el6_2.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 86, Issue 13
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two partitions I guess. which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand? you have to use GPT to put a partition past 2^32 * 512 bytes == 2TiB -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] rename3 ethernet NIC?
Hello listmates, Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called eth1 being called rename3. Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of this? Thanks. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ldap, 2.3 primary, 2.4 secondary
Hi all, Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP secondary? Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6. Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to. My LDAP secondaries pull the DB over pretty frequently so I would be doing the same thing here. I would have asked the OpenLDAP list but you are much nicer to an order of magnitude, seriously. Thanks in advance, - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On 4/24/2012 1:32 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 04/24/12 4:46 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: I used the raid controller for this. On a regular disk you just create two partitions I guess. which part of MBR not supporting disks over 2TB do you not understand? you have to use GPT to put a partition past 2^32 * 512 bytes == 2TiB I think there's something being lost in translation here. As I understand it, he is suggesting using the raid controller to create multiple slices from the disk (or raid unit). Each of these slices is less than 2TB and is presented to the system as a separate drive. Rather than a single 4TB drive, the OS now sees two 2TB drives and is able to partition each one separately. -- Bowie ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device). /boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates. -- Gé ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
Ge, Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Boris. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device). /boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates. -- Gé ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] rename3 ethernet NIC?
On 04/24/2012 02:10 PM, Boris Epstein wrote: Hello listmates, Bizarrely enough, I ended up with what I intended to be called eth1 being called rename3. Would anybody have any idea what the cause could be of this? Thanks. Boris. This should help; On CentOS 6.x: https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_EL6_and_Fedora_12%2B On CentOS 5.x: https://alteeve.com/w/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
2012/4/24 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com: Ge, Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Boris. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device). /boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates. How about creating raid with two slices: one small (30GB) for installation and rest for data partition. Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid 60 or raid 10 looks much better solution. -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fiwrote: 2012/4/24 Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com: Ge, Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Boris. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Gé Weijers g...@weijers.org wrote: Here's the low-tech approach: put /boot on a memory stick, and boot from that (assuming your BIOS can be set to boot of a USD device). /boot usually only get access when you do kernel updates. How about creating raid with two slices: one small (30GB) for installation and rest for data partition. Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid 60 or raid 10 looks much better solution. -- Eero ___ Eero, I am going to look into how to create those slices; problem is, it may or may not be possible. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti: Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@saunalahti.fiwrote: 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti: Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume. -- Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@iki.fi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Yes, that could work provided I have disk slices to work with. Which I don't at the time of installation as the installation utility does not allow me to partition disks under LPT, only under the MSDOS label which imposes the 2TB limit. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@saunalahti.fi: 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti: Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume. Is it really possible to boot from 18TB lvm partition? with mbr? with grub? http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-lvm-diskdruid-manual.html well. no? The /boot/ partition cannot reside on an LVM volume because the GRUB boot loader cannot read it -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
2012/4/25 Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi: 2012/4/25 Markku Kolkka markku.kol...@saunalahti.fi: 24.4.2012 23:52, Boris Epstein kirjoitti: Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Don't partition it at all, assign the whole drive as a LVM physical volume. Is it really possible to boot from 18TB lvm partition? with mbr? with grub? http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-lvm-diskdruid-manual.html well. no? The /boot/ partition cannot reside on an LVM volume because the GRUB boot loader cannot read it I think best solution is to slice raid into two volumes in raid manager or install delicated boot disk inside the server, if possible? -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Boris Epstein borepst...@gmail.com wrote: Ge, Thanks! I am afraid that will still not address the issue of how I would partition the drive for the installation. Any way you'd like. CentOS can't BOOT from a GPT partitioned device if the BIOS does not support it, but you can certainly use GPT on non-boot devices. -- Gé ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0465 Critical CentOS 5 samba Update
Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable?
- Original Message -
|
| CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical
|
| Upstream details at :
| http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html
|
| The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
| syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
|
| i386:
| 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa
| libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920
| libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 294d346782344d32018a02ac25c9def811cbaced00ce19c0ca7c193d4f68d0c0
| samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| b792d801b4d57882b7c3f398d44b378446d6be48a07b12b265f07dc25564db13
| samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb
| samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 1bea83056056c3da0dc568f13655c61c6b14f56957e71804d6d8f26f7c82
| samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
|
| x86_64:
| 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa
| libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 61b5237a09f59a445730e994517ad565fb24da1e9bf07b5e6b7b8c80ac6ca588
| libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
| 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920
| libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 5c973b1c9c0a986989805afe6f600a48a76d9d6175e92896065591795516a157
| libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
| 55ee35ca8dc332e0bea6299ce2eed90d7b9460ae312a8abf42822cd0a737c555
| samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
| 70200f37cfe741d94e9bb9060f9f2128d08a90ac6b6674f97a9adb474ea3f41b
| samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
| 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb
| samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm
| 16e9165d7d3f3099d45f6389a58f7ebc87642856414506728e5d8f0466e343a3
| samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
| e4f6f354d8a38ffb4f17af0be3736be3a9e055ba3e6ddff5f21a547fb8924d4f
| samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm
|
| Source:
| 4e4b6d761aed021020fe8ac82340ba78f835fc4610516ee8564da347ac735e22
| samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.src.rpm
|
|
|
| --
| Johnny Hughes
| CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
| irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
|
| ___
| CentOS-announce mailing list
| centos-annou...@centos.org
| http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
|
--
James A. Peltier
Manager, IT Services - Research Computing Group
Simon Fraser University - Burnaby Campus
Phone : 778-782-6573
Fax : 778-782-3045
E-Mail : jpelt...@sfu.ca
Website : http://www.sfu.ca/itservices
http://blogs.sfu.ca/people/jpeltier
Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached
in life but as by the obstacles they have overcome. - Booker T. Washington
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0465 Critical CentOS 5 samba Update
On 2012-04-24, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote: Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable? A CESA about samba3x was sent out on the same day, IIRC. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0465 Critical CentOS 5 samba Update
On 04/24/2012 05:00 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: Any idea about samba3x packages? Are they vulnerable? - Original Message - | | CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0465 Critical | | Upstream details at : | http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0465.html | | The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently | syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) | | i386: | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920 | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 294d346782344d32018a02ac25c9def811cbaced00ce19c0ca7c193d4f68d0c0 | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | b792d801b4d57882b7c3f398d44b378446d6be48a07b12b265f07dc25564db13 | samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 1bea83056056c3da0dc568f13655c61c6b14f56957e71804d6d8f26f7c82 | samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | | x86_64: | 50fc234754d886f8147c22ed2b034d1f7be84dd78c10a8280699265a9c542cfa | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 61b5237a09f59a445730e994517ad565fb24da1e9bf07b5e6b7b8c80ac6ca588 | libsmbclient-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | 62c20ba55a5213be09a2250454274f1fbf6aa854e84d78aaa1f75aec5d2a1920 | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 5c973b1c9c0a986989805afe6f600a48a76d9d6175e92896065591795516a157 | libsmbclient-devel-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | 55ee35ca8dc332e0bea6299ce2eed90d7b9460ae312a8abf42822cd0a737c555 | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | 70200f37cfe741d94e9bb9060f9f2128d08a90ac6b6674f97a9adb474ea3f41b | samba-client-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | 77a3666353bbc27ff71b1d4e34882459c5b440f783f21bb3c0adc3898ef501fb | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.i386.rpm | 16e9165d7d3f3099d45f6389a58f7ebc87642856414506728e5d8f0466e343a3 | samba-common-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | e4f6f354d8a38ffb4f17af0be3736be3a9e055ba3e6ddff5f21a547fb8924d4f | samba-swat-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.x86_64.rpm | | Source: | 4e4b6d761aed021020fe8ac82340ba78f835fc4610516ee8564da347ac735e22 | samba-3.0.33-3.39.el5_8.src.rpm Yes, they are vulnerable ... and they were also updated: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2012-April/018561.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NTLMv2 compatibility in Samba 3.0.33 standard packages
Good afternoon/morning/evening everyone, I've been running into the problem of clients using Windows 7 with CentOS 5.X and file/printer sharing. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the stand samba-3.0.33-x.x.x packages DO NOT provide compatibility with Windows Vista/7. I've had to manually compile samba from source or use the samba3x packages to fix the problem. Just wondering if we're ever going to have the NTLMv2 subroutines compiled into the update/centosplus repo packages. Thanks, -- _ANDREW REIS_ MCTS, Network+ Software/Networking Microsoft Windows Support/Webmaster DBMS Inc. Email: ar...@dbmsinc.com [1] Direct Line: (888) 862-0662 ext. 307 Emergency # ONLY: (218) 833-2508 __ Links: -- [1] mailto:ar...@dbmsinc.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2
Hi All, I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I tried doing the minimal installation available with the installer, but it's a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm finding in 6.2 is a lot of new stuff, and a lot of odd behavior. For example, cups is starting at boot time, despite being disabled by chkconfig. And I'm finding things like qpidd, matahari, messagebus, and portreserve that really don't belong in a minimal setup. To clarify, I'm shooting for a simple config, like one would use for a dedicated DNS server. Can anyone point me to an up-to-date list of daemon processes that indicates what they do and whether they can be safely disabled? Also, any ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated. Thanks, --Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:22:17 -0700, listmail wrote Also, any ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated. I answered one of my own questions: cups was being started by the VMware tools startup script. I fixed this for now by editing the VMware startup script and removing the command that starts it. Still interested in a list of daemons that can be cleanly stopped, if one exists for 6.2 yet. Thanks, --Bill ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2
On 4/24/2012 7:22 PM, listmail wrote: I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I tried doing the minimal installation available with the installer, but it's a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm finding in 6.2 is a lot of new stuff, and a lot of odd behavior. For example, cups is starting at boot time, despite being disabled by chkconfig. And I'm finding things like qpidd, matahari, messagebus, and portreserve that really don't belong in a minimal setup. To clarify, I'm shooting for a simple config, like one would use for a dedicated DNS server. Can anyone point me to an up-to-date list of daemon processes that indicates what they do and whether they can be safely disabled? Also, any ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated. I did a 'basic server' for my dns and then did this for cleaning up... yum install yum-cron logwatch bind bind-chroot yum-cron remove packages yum remove samba-winbind-clients qpid-cpp-client matahari* cups the two clients will get rid of a lot. chkconfig atd off chkconfig autofs off chkconfig kdump off chkconfig netfs off chkconfig nfslock off chkconfig rpcidmapd off chkconfig rpcgssd off chkconfig rpcbind off I left the rest on but that pretty much did it for me.. here is my chkconfig list, off and on /root$ chkconfig --list |grep 3:on abrt-ccpp 0:off1:off2:off3:on4:off5:on6:off abrt-oops 0:off1:off2:off3:on4:off5:on6:off abrtd 0:off1:off2:off3:on4:off5:on6:off acpid 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off auditd 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off cpuspeed 0:off1:on2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off crond 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off haldaemon 0:off1:off2:off3:on4:on5:on6:off ip6tables 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off iptables 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off irqbalance 0:off1:off2:off3:on4:on5:on6:off lvm2-monitor 0:off1:on2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off mcelogd0:off1:off2:off3:on4:off5:on6:off mdmonitor 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off messagebus 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off named 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off network0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off ntpd 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off portreserve0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off postfix0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off rsyslog0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off sshd 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off sysstat0:off1:on2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off udev-post 0:off1:on2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off yum-cron 0:off1:off2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off /root$ chkconfig --list |grep 3:off atd0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off autofs 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off certmonger 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off cgconfig 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off cgred 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off kdump 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off netconsole 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off netfs 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off nfs0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off nfslock0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off ntpdate0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off oddjobd0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off psacct 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off quota_nld 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rdisc 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off restorecond0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rngd 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rpcbind0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rpcgssd0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rpcidmapd 0:off1:off2:off3:off4:off5:off 6:off rpcsvcgssd 0:off
Re: [CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2
I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it didn't include the network stack. What use is an install w/o the network? === Al From: Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 5:18 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2 On 4/24/2012 7:22 PM, listmail wrote: I a working on configuring a not-quite minimal installation of CentOS 6.2. I tried doing the minimal installation available with the installer, but it's a bit too minimal to be useful. So I'm cutting down from a less minimal starting place. I'm pretty familiar with 5.x, but what I'm finding in 6.2 is a lot of new stuff, and a lot of odd behavior. For example, cups is starting at boot time, despite being disabled by chkconfig. And I'm finding things like qpidd, matahari, messagebus, and portreserve that really don't belong in a minimal setup. To clarify, I'm shooting for a simple config, like one would use for a dedicated DNS server. Can anyone point me to an up-to-date list of daemon processes that indicates what they do and whether they can be safely disabled? Also, any ideas as to what would be launching cups would be appreciated. I did a 'basic server' for my dns and then did this for cleaning up... yum install yum-cron logwatch bind bind-chroot yum-cron remove packages yum remove samba-winbind-clients qpid-cpp-client matahari* cups the two clients will get rid of a lot. chkconfig atd off chkconfig autofs off chkconfig kdump off chkconfig netfs off chkconfig nfslock off chkconfig rpcidmapd off chkconfig rpcgssd off chkconfig rpcbind off I left the rest on but that pretty much did it for me.. here is my chkconfig list, off and on /root$ chkconfig --list |grep 3:on abrt-ccpp 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:off 5:on 6:off abrt-oops 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:off 5:on 6:off abrtd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:off 5:on 6:off acpid 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off auditd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off cpuspeed 0:off 1:on 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off crond 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off haldaemon 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off ip6tables 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off iptables 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off irqbalance 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off lvm2-monitor 0:off 1:on 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off mcelogd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:off 5:on 6:off mdmonitor 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off messagebus 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off named 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off network 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off ntpd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off portreserve 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off postfix 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off rsyslog 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off sshd 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off sysstat 0:off 1:on 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off udev-post 0:off 1:on 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off yum-cron 0:off 1:off 2:on 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off /root$ chkconfig --list |grep 3:off atd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off autofs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off certmonger 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off cgconfig 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off cgred 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off kdump 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off netconsole 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off netfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off nfs 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off nfslock 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ntpdate 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off oddjobd 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off psacct 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off quota_nld 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off rdisc 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off restorecond 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off
Re: [CentOS] Not Quite Minimal CentOS 6.2
On 04/24/2012 08:53 PM, Al Sparks wrote: I recently did a minimal 6.2 install recently, and it was annoying that it didn't include the network stack. What use is an install w/o the network? It has the network stack ... you must configure it during the install. If you do not configure and enable the ethernet card then it does not turn on by default ... but it is in the installer to be able to do: http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/CentOS6#head-b67e85d98f0e9f1b599358105c551632c6ff7c90 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] strange partitioning problem
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:17 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote: On 04/24/12 2:24 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote: Anyway, with 18TB of raid 6 might cause performance problems .. raid 60 or raid 10 looks much better solution. 18TB of raid6 is only 8 3TB drives (6 + 2 parity) thats not an unreasonable size for a raid6 set. for the 81TB nearline storage boxes I built for a data archive application, I formatted each box (using a megaraid sas2 9260-8i card and 36 3TB SAS drives) as 3 x 11 x raid60, plus 3 hot spares, and then made one big XFS on that. Its working out quite nicely.I think 10 or 12 disks per raid5 or 6 is a good upper limit.rebuild time from a single failure was 12 hours, and from a double failure in the same raid plex, 18 hours. -- john r pierceN 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast Actually in our case we've got 12 2TB drives - but still I think John's point stands. Boris. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ldap, 2.3 primary, 2.4 secondary
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 14:40 -0400, aurfalien wrote: Hi all, Is it possible to use a 2.3 OpenLDAP primary while having a 2.4 OpenLDAP secondary? Currently I have all at 2.3 (Centos 5) but am needing to up a remote facility to Centos 6 before doing the main facility to 6. Hoping I can mix and match but it looks like I may not be able to. My LDAP secondaries pull the DB over pretty frequently so I would be doing the same thing here. I would have asked the OpenLDAP list but you are much nicer to an order of magnitude, seriously. Thanks in advance, wouldn't do a bit of good to ask openldap list - they'll just tell you that 2.3.x is EOL Shouldn't have any problems but I haven't tried it myself. There have been some issues with replication with 2.3/2.4 but I would suspect that if you haven't run into them with 2.3, then you're not running an overly complicated setup and it should work. Craig -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
