Re: [CentOS] error 24 attempt to access block outside of partition SOLVED
On 04/29/2012 12:00 AM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: > On Saturday 28 April 2012, Phil Savoie wrote: > >> default=1 > > Remember that Grub starts counting with 0, not with 1. The default is > the second stanza, not the first. > >> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64 ro >> root=UUID=b9245ece-994f-44c8-9831-ec24cf865b6e nomodeset rd_NO_LUKS >> KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD quiet >> SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 rhgb crashkernel=auto rd_NO_LVM selinux=0 >> rd_NO_DM nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau > > Does the file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64 exist? Is the > fiilesystem UUID really b9245ece-994f-44c8-9831-ec24cf865b6e (check with > tune2fs -l /dev/sda1)? > >> title CentOS (2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64) >> root (hd0,0) >> kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 ro >> root=UUID=b9245ece-994f-44c8-9831-ec24cf865b6e nomodeset rd_NO_LUKS >> KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_NO_MD quiet >> SYSFONT=latarcyrheb-sun16 rhgb crashkernel=auto rd_NO_LVM selinux=0 >> rd_NO_DM nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau >> initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64.img > > This is the default. Does the file /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-220.el6.x86_64 > still exist? > Yes it does. This morning I manually removed the new kernel and updated it again and it works. Weird!! But thank you for taking the time to respond. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Libreoffice.org "official" RPMs in yum friendly format
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 13:55, Nux! wrote: > I thought I "spammed" here as well last night when I sent to the SL > list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise. > > Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the > libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them all in > a repo. > More on this here > > http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html > > Thanks to Ljubomir, Philippe, Jake and all the other persons who came > with suggestions and ideas on this list. > > Super! Thank you for this repo. In the future, do you keep update with main package of LibreOffice.org? Regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Libreoffice.org "official" RPMs in yum friendly format
On 29.04.2012 21:07, Vnpenguin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 13:55, Nux! wrote: > >> I thought I "spammed" here as well last night when I sent to the SL >> list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise. >> >> Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the >> libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them >> all in >> a repo. >> More on this here >> >> >> http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html >> >> Thanks to Ljubomir, Philippe, Jake and all the other persons who >> came >> with suggestions and ideas on this list. >> >> > Super! Thank you for this repo. > In the future, do you keep update with main package of > LibreOffice.org? Hi, Yes, that's the idea. No more `tar xzvf` ... :-) -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Libreoffice.org "official" RPMs in yum friendly format
On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, Nux! wrote: > I thought I "spammed" here as well last night when I sent to the SL > list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise. > > Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the > libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them all in > a repo. > More on this here > http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html > > Thanks to Ljubomir, Philippe, Jake and all the other persons who came > with suggestions and ideas on this list. > I haven;t tested this version, but previous versions from OpenOffice.org were installed in /opt directory. Just to warn people to expect it. -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your trusty Spiderman... StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Libreoffice.org "official" RPMs in yum friendly format
On 29.04.2012 23:36, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 04/27/2012 01:55 PM, Nux! wrote: >> I thought I "spammed" here as well last night when I sent to the SL >> list, but appears not. Sorry for the noise. >> >> Anyway, for those of you interested to run the RPMs from the >> libreoffice.org tarball instead of the stock packages, I put them >> all in >> a repo. >> More on this here >> >> http://www.nux.ro/archive/2012/04/LibreOffice_org_RPMs_in_a_yum_friendly_format.html >> >> Thanks to Ljubomir, Philippe, Jake and all the other persons who >> came >> with suggestions and ideas on this list. >> > > I haven;t tested this version, but previous versions from > OpenOffice.org > were installed in /opt directory. Just to warn people to expect it. Yes, this is where Libreoffice.org RPMs still install. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] yum yum or not?
Shaun wrote: > I just need to be really careful about the remove command in future. I've found that breaking things is always the fastest path to a great education. -- Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd (04) 460-2531 : (021) 295-1923 www.knossos.net.nz signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup from module_request
Getting module_request errors from SELinux. Errors being thrown by
metacity
sendmail.postfix
cleanup
trivial-rewarite
local
postdrop
pickup
All errors are essentially the same
System was working well until I began to apply some basic security
hardening configuration.
Postfix started complaining when I made /tmp noexec, nodev, nosuid, and
then did a mount --bind of /var/tmp under /tmp.
Backed that out the remount of /var/tmp and those errors went away. But
then these errors started showing up.
Here is an example of a postfix pickup error. What is going on? I could
allow the module to load, but I want to understand what is going on and
the dangers of making the mod before I do it.
SELinux is preventing /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup from module_request
access on the system Unknown.
* Plugin catchall_boolean (89.3 confidence) suggests
***
If you want to allow all domains to have the kernel load modules
Then you must tell SELinux about this by enabling the
'domain_kernel_load_modules' boolean.
Do
setsebool -P domain_kernel_load_modules 1
* Plugin catchall (11.6 confidence) suggests
***
If you believe that pickup should be allowed module_request access on
the Unknown system by default.
Then you should report this as a bug.
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access.
Do
allow this access for now by executing:
# grep pickup /var/log/audit/audit.log | audit2allow -M mypol
# semodule -i mypol.pp
Additional Information:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:postfix_pickup_t:s0
Target Contextsystem_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0
Target ObjectsUnknown [ system ]
Sourcepickup
Source Path /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup
Port
Host desk.localdomain
Source RPM Packages postfix-2.6.6-2.2.el6_1
Target RPM Packages
Policy RPMselinux-policy-3.7.19-126.el6_2.10
Selinux Enabled True
Policy Type targeted
Enforcing ModeEnforcing
Host Name desk.localdomain
Platform Linux desk.localdomain
2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64
#1 SMP Tue Apr 17 23:56:34 BST 2012 x86_64
x86_64
Alert Count 24
First SeenFri 27 Apr 2012 02:46:55 PM MDT
Last Seen Sun 29 Apr 2012 05:10:32 AM MDT
Local ID 4b8e5292-93f1-4e69-8bb4-4ea70bc5232e
Raw Audit Messages
type=AVC msg=audit(1335697832.612:34911): avc: denied
{ module_request } for pid=24226 comm="pickup" kmod="net-pf-10"
scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_pickup_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:kernel_t:s0 tclass=system
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1335697832.612:34911): arch=x86_64 syscall=socket
success=no exit=EAFNOSUPPORT a0=a a1=1 a2=0 a3=7fff3ca82190 items=0
ppid=1925 pid=24226 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0
egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=pickup
exe=/usr/libexec/postfix/pickup
subj=system_u:system_r:postfix_pickup_t:s0 key=(null)
Hash: pickup,postfix_pickup_t,kernel_t,system,module_request
audit2allow
#= postfix_pickup_t ==
# This avc can be allowed using the boolean
'domain_kernel_load_modules'
allow postfix_pickup_t kernel_t:system module_request;
audit2allow -R
#= postfix_pickup_t ==
# This avc can be allowed using the boolean
'domain_kernel_load_modules'
allow postfix_pickup_t kernel_t:system module_request;
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] (no subject)
___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
