[CentOS] mysql secure installation and multi mysqld
If you adjust the my.cnf file to make separate instances of mysql. How would you go through the mysql secure installation? Is is possible or must it all be done manually for each one? is it possible to make each one of those instances a replicate/slave of a different master (thus a backup mysql server in a way?) working on this now, but having issues getting it to work. (centos 6) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] XEN or KVM - performance/stability/security?
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 03:46:43PM -0700, Gordon Messmer wrote: > A late reply, but hopefully a useful set of feedback for the archives: > > On 04/20/2012 05:59 AM, Rafał Radecki wrote: > > Key factors from my opint of view are: > > - stability (which one runs more smoothly on CentOS?) > > I found that xenconsoled could frequently crash in Xen dom0, and that > guests would be unable to reboot until it was fixed. I also found that > paravirt CentOS domUs would not boot if they were updated before the > dom0. In short, Xen paravirt was very fragile and troublesome. I never > tested Xen with hardware virtualization. This particular problem was fixed some time ago, it hasn't happened to my (many) dom0s in more than a year. The RHEL5 Xen dom0 was garbage until 5.3 or so. To the point where I'd compile my own and deal with the pain of using a non-rhel kernel with a rehl userland. Stability has improved vastly. > > - performance (XEN PV/HVM(with or without pv drivers) vs KVM HVM(with or > > without pv drivers)) > > PV drivers will make some difference, but the biggest performance > difference you'll see is probably the difference between file-backed VMs > and LVM-backed VMs. File-backed VMs are extremely slow. Whichever > system you choose, use LVMs as the backing for your guests. My experience has been that using qemu for disk has something of a multiplier effect; e.g. it makes slow spinning disk noticably slower. The paravirtualized drivers help immensely in that regard. (how are the paravirt drivers in KVM these days? I have a server full of kvm guests running some ancient version of ubuntu I will be moving to RHEL6 shortly.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012, John R. Dennison wrote: > >> Um, both work out of the box with selinux set to enforcing. There are >> other issues at play. >> >> Disabling selinux is never a fix. Found the issue. /var/spool/mail permission wasn't set correctly. That fixed it. *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, 16 May 2012, William Hooper wrote: > Did you relabel after copying? I believe you want to look at > restorecon (or just relabel the whole filesystem). No, I didn't. And that's where the problem lies. :-) Bingo. Thanks! Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I cannot get the Postfix service to start on my pristine copy of CentOS > 6.2 (installed straight from a DVD, and 6.2 directly, not 6.0 with > upgrades...not thatit should matter). > > Anyway, I copied over /var/spool/mail to this system by using tar, > as well as /etc/services and /etc/passwd, etc. Now, it doesn't want to > start. I get permission errors like: Did you relabel after copying? I believe you want to look at restorecon (or just relabel the whole filesystem). http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux -- William Hooper ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Notes on booting CentOS 6 natively on GPT with an EFI bootloader such as Chameleon without BIOS GPT/EFI support.
Ok, did some experiments. Here's the scoop. You will need a live USB key of CentOS 6 with a persistence layer (overlay) and the EPEL gdisk package installed to make this thing boot. On a system with Chameleon already installed, boot the CentOS 6 install media. Installing Chameleon without OSX is an adventure that I've not done, so a 'testing' OSX install (10.6) with the Chameleon bootloader installed was used; once Chameleon is in the EFI boot partition in theory you can blow away the HFS+ OSX filesystem, but I've not tried it. This involves partitioning the disk as GPT, and there are numerous howtos out there for many motherboards and laptops; the key is to get Chameleon in the MBR and the EFI boot partition properly created, set up with a protective MBR, and populated. Install to the free space on the system, using a /boot of about 500MB, swap space to taste, and other filesystems as you like. When the install prompts for bootloader installation location, you DO NOT want to install to the MBR (Chameleon is there); rather, install it to the /boot partition (on my test system this was /dev/sda3). Finish the installation. It won't yet be bootable. Now, boot your liveUSB stick. When you get your desktop, pull up a terminal and become root. At the root prompt, invoke gdisk just like you would fdisk, making sure to get the right disk device and partition. The command set for gdisk is virtually identical to fdisk. Use 'p' to list the partitions; you'll see your /boot as a partition type of 'EF00' as set by parted in the installer. You want to change that partition type to '0700' instead. The bootable partition must remain the small EFI boot partition of type EF00. You can name the partitions with the 'c' command; I encourage this. Use the 'w' to write out the GPT when done, and shut down. Remove the CentOS 6 liveUSB and reboot. Chameleon should automatically pick up the 'Linux' system in its bootsplash. Now, it may be possible to get parted to make the /boot partition to be type 0700 instead of EF00; didn't try that, since I know gdisk will do it correctly. As I was using a Dell Inspiron 640m, I used a Chameleon boot CD for a Dell Latitude D620 to good effect; you can find that on insanelymac.com. That particular Chameleon install includes a Dell logo and such, and may be some different from your particular Chameleon install. I have not tried this with a drive larger than 2TB; google for 'Chameleon bootloader EFI 2TB' to see the progress in this area. In theory this would allow a BIOS booting machine to boot directly on a 2TB+ drive using GPT without having EFI or variant in the BIOS. Once I get a single drive large than 2TB, or free up a machine with an FC connection and a > 2TB LUN attached to it, I'll try that out, and attempt to do a Chameleon installation without the OSX step in between. -- Lamar Owen Chief Information Officer Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 1 PARI Drive Rosman, NC 28772 http://www.pari.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, 16 May 2012, John R. Dennison wrote: > Um, both work out of the box with selinux set to enforcing. There are > other issues at play. > > Disabling selinux is never a fix. What other issues should I look for? I used apache out of the box with the default config, changed it to my server name...and it denied access. Turned off Selinux, bingo. No different than any other Apache server out there with default configs. *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 02:57:03PM -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > No, it was the same reason I couldn't get Apache to work: > > Selinux was enabled. > > I disabled Selinux. Now, both work fine. Um, both work out of the box with selinux set to enforcing. There are other issues at play. Disabling selinux is never a fix. John -- If the world were a village of 100 people 6 people (all in the USA) would own 59% of all the village's wealth, 74 people would share another 39%, and 20 people would share the remaining 2%. -- David Copeland, in Value Earth pgp2J8yiL7qgf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Steve Thompson wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2012, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> I'm stumped. Does anyone have any ideas what the issue could be? > > Yes, you overwrote /etc/passwd and who knows what else, so it is no wonder > that it is completely broken. Start again. > > Steve No, it was the same reason I couldn't get Apache to work: Selinux was enabled. I disabled Selinux. Now, both work fine. *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
On Wed, 16 May 2012, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > I'm stumped. Does anyone have any ideas what the issue could be? Yes, you overwrote /etc/passwd and who knows what else, so it is no wonder that it is completely broken. Start again. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Postfix will not start due to permission errors on CentOS 6.2 x86
Hello everyone, I cannot get the Postfix service to start on my pristine copy of CentOS 6.2 (installed straight from a DVD, and 6.2 directly, not 6.0 with upgrades...not thatit should matter). Anyway, I copied over /var/spool/mail to this system by using tar, as well as /etc/services and /etc/passwd, etc. Now, it doesn't want to start. I get permission errors like: postfix/master: warning: /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup pid 2006 exit 1 postfix/master:warning /usr/libexec/postfix/pickup: bad command startup -- throttling postfix/pickup: fatal: scan_dir_push: open directory maildrop: permission denied warning: the postfix sendmail command has set-uid root file permissions warning: or the command is run from a set-uid root process warning: the Postfix sendmail command must be installed without set-uid root file permissions Now, I Googled these errors, and didn't see any good specific help for CentOS. So, I did a yum erase postfix, which also erased dependencies. After I did that, I erased the /etc/postfix directory. I then reinstalled postfix with all the dependencies...and got the same errors. Then I googled the CentOS mailing list for help...nothing that applied to me turned up that I saw. I'm stumped. Does anyone have any ideas what the issue could be? Gilbert *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ldirectord package on centos 6
On 05/16/2012 04:13 PM, Peter Hinse wrote: > Am Wed, 16 May 2012 15:06:15 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > >> On 05/16/2012 08:52 AM, Peter Hinse wrote: >>> Am Tue, 15 May 2012 21:11:00 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >>> I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously this was available as "heartbeat-ldirectord" and nowadays it is built as an independent package from "resource-agents" however neither seems to be available either in core centos 6 or epel. Where did it go? >>> >>> Look at the resource-agents SPEC file, the ldirectord is not built >>> anymore. Some tweaking in the SPEC will give you the package back. >>> However, upstream (RH) has decided to not support ldirectord any more. >> >> Ok, so how does upstream provide load balancing features then? The only >> alternative I know is keepalived and that doesn't really play well in a >> cluster environment. > > See http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/pdf/ > Load_Balancer_Administration/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-6- > Load_Balancer_Administration-en-US.pdf After some digging I finally found the components in the piranha package. That stuff looks pretty scary though (as in "not really meant for production systems") so I'll probaby look into creating a standalong ldirectord rpm. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Installation of CentOS 6 on KVM - Hangs
- Original Message - > Greetings- > > I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine > running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB > RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation proceeds fine using either minimal > or netinstall CDs until installation of the selinux or More specifically, it's hanging on the selinux-policy-targeted RPM. Not sure if this makes a difference, but I thought it worthy of note. --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 87, Issue 10
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2012:0571 Moderate CentOS 6 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2012:0672 CentOS 5 binutils Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 09:19:09 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:0571 Moderate CentOS 6 kernel
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20120516091909.ga20...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0571 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0571.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
c647a4f968988d4a5419e5afed5cb74c52e3d9dfba09baafa7d00ebf5a635a4f
kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
49120071c940ec1d48c5e2aed27fbce8f0bae536993e5fb8fb693b5fcf600baf
kernel-debug-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
fa2a72da7dd451d8d646c4adf7be4145ccd87697a9919abe2a4ece562e6ff83d
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
103799d749f8015da8632eda2cfa3447edc6b4c306432fc784d791e1800ba8e4
kernel-devel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
f2cee8e26a93d4dcffb4ca48967362a906aad0420ab05a566be5dd7a6274dbc5
kernel-doc-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.noarch.rpm
5731558ecae43f8b1733da18318b1218d078b003741341001a75599ae894
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.noarch.rpm
103af35fca156730f22f4907019dc5c43e312305f2696c260f9ee67c84f2af21
kernel-headers-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
41dc79e5e4454a0f740109d381562a39afa1839faeb0278e1129f95be78872e0
perf-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
702657e91e418bb3e22e6f2ee0226641306a2f428358fa42fa0bcce9d2f51d84
python-perf-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
693ca4053772d93f38fa2a19393e022811bd11a349c7bd211b54a81523f1b4bf
kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
53ba0a7f2d9763d868e29c4f49e382e69099a4366b3dd714a4697e93803c3ec6
kernel-debug-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
f527dbc9ced3beb286bf4fd13c08b4c98cfc6db608d61c982179554366023e15
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
f11da0faa2d01f207dba99b0a9cd6e4f30f2ae3e4e08f26cc0ad9453a7eae433
kernel-devel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
9d28a169e8c37a3b133835eff722fa342565e2bf6b03972aef2cb5183083b97a
kernel-doc-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.noarch.rpm
61600b65da0b06f393eb06da0b7dec6167b5bb9aebff30c74079d5ca3d63af87
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.noarch.rpm
0810b98c53846cb87c996d46cecedae999e3f75ded31c38928d17f9de56375c3
kernel-headers-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
35e388db01227bade30dbe2b8ae7f74808e2a425ad851626c548a14127db096f
perf-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
c97d385accfaa81fb2948fe6fadd69c361751e5196c0752aed15d3375df9dcfd
python-perf-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d2599082fda0e6887921bfca2cdb2d5e81dd25f5fce37c9d5f443ed2bba2ca69
kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 12:16:44 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:0672 CentOS 5 binutils Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20120516121644.ga29...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0672
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0672.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
96193a1ab55252b279deb9147564395ca11a6d4abd5c6e78416eedbcbfa33fa4
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
5ce6b8151aa51e7adea5ba135059334a3484f2df460443eb44c5df137c5b20ad
binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
x86_64:
f07f1302e7cfb72c5041022e096e99b9c387639f141a41b0b55e89aca48cdd44
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm
5ce6b8151aa51e7adea5ba135059334a3484f2df460443eb44c5df137c5b20ad
binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.i386.rpm
36e5acba1e89128f5cb11277d4b9c6c1ba91ee3ddadf2fc9418515b80125d91c
binutils-devel-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
4a407431f5c5865c9ae185db7658e18e6f54160494750b9f8f7f4665d0674f09
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-20.el5_8.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS] Installation of CentOS 6 on KVM - Hangs
Greetings- I'm attempting to install CentOS-6 x86_64 to a virtual machine running via KVM on a Proxmox 1.9 system. The specs are 4x CPUs, 4GB RAM, and 160GB HDD. Installation proceeds fine using either minimal or netinstall CDs until installation of the selinux or qla2xx-firmware RPMs. At this point, the installation hangs, and never completes. I'm unable to see what is going on 'under the hood' on another TTY as the console does not appear to be accepting my CTL-ALT-Fx commands either. I have also tried installing using the full bin DVD1, but the initial installation errors out immediately noting the yum package cannot be read from source disk/etc. And yes, I have checked the MD5s on all downloaded ISOs. I can readily duplicate this. Any thoughts or pointers on the cause and/or solution? Thanks! --Tim ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OSS DSP sound card input on CentOS 6.2?
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 08:41 -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > Thanks, John. I don't see padsp on my system, and "yum install padsp" does > nothing. Any hints as to what I must do to install it? man yum? first for how to hints...that fails find friend google... yum whatprovides */padsp John then.. $ padsp my_app signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ldirectord package on centos 6
Am Wed, 16 May 2012 15:06:15 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > On 05/16/2012 08:52 AM, Peter Hinse wrote: >> Am Tue, 15 May 2012 21:11:00 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> >>> I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously >>> this was available as "heartbeat-ldirectord" and nowadays it is built >>> as an independent package from "resource-agents" however neither seems >>> to be available either in core centos 6 or epel. Where did it go? >> >> Look at the resource-agents SPEC file, the ldirectord is not built >> anymore. Some tweaking in the SPEC will give you the package back. >> However, upstream (RH) has decided to not support ldirectord any more. > > Ok, so how does upstream provide load balancing features then? The only > alternative I know is keepalived and that doesn't really play well in a > cluster environment. See http://docs.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/pdf/ Load_Balancer_Administration/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux-6- Load_Balancer_Administration-en-US.pdf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OSS DSP sound card input on CentOS 6.2?
On Wed, 16 May 2012, John Stanley wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:07 -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > >> >> But under CentOS 6.2, there is no such device. I see /dev/snd, and it >> has: > > There is:.. > >> But nothing that looks OSS-ish to me. > > cat /usr/bin/padsp or man padsp > > That'll tell you what to do. All else fails you can stream the audio > with netcat. Thanks, John. I don't see padsp on my system, and "yum install padsp" does nothing. Any hints as to what I must do to install it? Thanks! *** Gilbert Sebenste (My opinions only!) ** *** ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ldirectord package on centos 6
On 05/16/2012 08:52 AM, Peter Hinse wrote: > Am Tue, 15 May 2012 21:11:00 +0200 schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > >> I'm looking for the ldirectord package but can't find it. Previously >> this was available as "heartbeat-ldirectord" and nowadays it is built as >> an independent package from "resource-agents" however neither seems to >> be available either in core centos 6 or epel. Where did it go? > > Look at the resource-agents SPEC file, the ldirectord is not built > anymore. Some tweaking in the SPEC will give you the package back. > However, upstream (RH) has decided to not support ldirectord any more. Ok, so how does upstream provide load balancing features then? The only alternative I know is keepalived and that doesn't really play well in a cluster environment. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTP Daemon in not bound to port
>> > [root@proxy1 squid]# netstat -npl | grep ntp > udp0 0 172.21.0.2:123 0.0.0.0:* > 1154/ntpd > udp0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:* > 1154/ntpd > udp0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:* > 1154/ntpd > udp0 0 fe80::a00:27ff:fed6:c590:123 :::* > 1154/ntpd > udp0 0 ::1:123 :::* > 1154/ntpd > udp0 0 :::123 :::* > 1154/ntpd > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Dear Giles, thanks for you response. I identified myistake. Port is udp, therefor I should have use netstat -nulp but I did grep for tcp port. I wilwe heck when I reach back in office. I am sure this is not the problem, please ignore request. Thanks for you time and assistance Regards Sent from my iPhone ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] NTP Daemon in not bound to port
On 2012-05-16 13:19, Shiv. NK wrote: > Hello Dear Friends, > > it is CentOS Release 6.2, ntpd is running but do not see bounded to > the > port udp:123 > > any guidelines would be very much appreciable. > > [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntlp | grep ntpd > > > > [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntl | grep 123 > > > > But the service is running - > > [root@jet mavi]# /etc/init.d/ntpd status > ntpd (pid 15876) is running... > > Selinux is disabled > [root@proxy1 squid]# netstat -npl | grep ntp udp0 0 172.21.0.2:123 0.0.0.0:* 1154/ntpd udp0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:* 1154/ntpd udp0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:* 1154/ntpd udp0 0 fe80::a00:27ff:fed6:c590:123 :::* 1154/ntpd udp0 0 ::1:123 :::* 1154/ntpd udp0 0 :::123 :::* 1154/ntpd ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NTP Daemon in not bound to port
Hello Dear Friends, it is CentOS Release 6.2, ntpd is running but do not see bounded to the port udp:123 any guidelines would be very much appreciable. [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntlp | grep ntpd [root@jet mavi]# netstat -ntl | grep 123 But the service is running - [root@jet mavi]# /etc/init.d/ntpd status ntpd (pid 15876) is running... Selinux is disabled Thanks / regards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OSS DSP sound card input on CentOS 6.2?
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 15:07 -0500, Gilbert Sebenste wrote: > > But under CentOS 6.2, there is no such device. I see /dev/snd, and it > has: There is:.. > But nothing that looks OSS-ish to me. cat /usr/bin/padsp or man padsp That'll tell you what to do. All else fails you can stream the audio with netcat. John signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed causing high load average?
On 05/16/2012 09:03 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article<4fb3628a.4050...@karan.org>, > Karanbir Singh wrote: >> On 05/15/2012 01:05 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> Eventually I found that stopping the "cpuspeed" subsystem allowed the >>> load average to drop down to near zero, as I would expect it to be. >> and what impact did that have on your power consumption ? And did it >> make a difference to the performance of the machine ? > It's too early to say, since it is a new box that I am just setting up. > I would expect it to consume a little more power, since the CPU will be > running at full speed, but to perform better. > > Since it will be a high-traffic SIP server running Asterisk, I expect > running cpuspeed would be a bit pointless anyway. > > But that wasn't my main point, which was why cpuspeed should cause an > abnormally high load average on this system. > > Cheers > Tony just a thought there is a basic minimum load - when the CPU is at full speed it is a small % - when the CPU is throttled back to 30% of full speed the minimum load is a noticeable %?? HTH ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed causing high load average?
In article <4fb3628a.4050...@karan.org>, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 05/15/2012 01:05 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > > Eventually I found that stopping the "cpuspeed" subsystem allowed the > > load average to drop down to near zero, as I would expect it to be. > > and what impact did that have on your power consumption ? And did it > make a difference to the performance of the machine ? It's too early to say, since it is a new box that I am just setting up. I would expect it to consume a little more power, since the CPU will be running at full speed, but to perform better. Since it will be a high-traffic SIP server running Asterisk, I expect running cpuspeed would be a bit pointless anyway. But that wasn't my main point, which was why cpuspeed should cause an abnormally high load average on this system. Cheers Tony -- Tony Mountifield Work: t...@softins.co.uk - http://www.softins.co.uk Play: t...@mountifield.org - http://tony.mountifield.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] cpuspeed causing high load average?
On 05/15/2012 01:05 PM, Tony Mountifield wrote: > Eventually I found that stopping the "cpuspeed" subsystem allowed the > load average to drop down to near zero, as I would expect it to be. and what impact did that have on your power consumption ? And did it make a difference to the performance of the machine ? -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax | Gtalk: z00dax GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
