[CentOS-docs] Skype's no-redistribution policy
Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention this RPM, but I thought I shouldn't simply delete this part of the Wiki before asking here. Yves -- Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca La Esperanta Civito ne rifuzas anticipe la kunlaboron de erarintoj, se ili konscias pri sia eraro. -- Heroldo Komunikas, n-ro 473. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Skype's no-redistribution policy
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Yves Bellefeuille y...@storm.ca wrote: Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention this RPM, but I thought I shouldn't simply delete this part of the Wiki before asking here. Thanks for the note. I have reverted the change. In this case, I think we should apply the guilty until proven innocent rule. Akemi ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] Skype's no-redistribution policy
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 21:36 -0400, Yves Bellefeuille wrote: Hello: Skype for Linux version 4 has recently been released. An RPM package has been made, and it's mentioned in the Wiki: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype#head- a08dbc518378653842007a2eec37bc32e13c0bd0 However, Microsoft claims to prohibit redistribution of Skype (http://www.skype.com/intl/en-us/legal/terms/tou/ , subsection 4.2). My feeling is that the Wiki shouldn't mention this RPM, but I thought I shouldn't simply delete this part of the Wiki before asking here. Yves Well since we can link to it, it should still be mentioned as many people would like to know they can use it if needed. It is not like we are distributing it, thus the new change should not affect it being in the wiki. ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1029 CentOS 5 file FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1029
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1029.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8a98e586acca5ff300dac78f6f2cd2548001ff3f2f946e7c26613864f950102a
file-4.17-28.i386.rpm
x86_64:
50b33ade3d9a0209e2a7225ed959fd8ce9d6173ab279bca9a6738797d1acd26f
file-4.17-28.x86_64.rpm
Source:
690888b77be34b978a454a3c03705b4bbd7c2ac5bdf4cef13221f6c1c3837074
file-4.17-28.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] IPTables, DNS y postfix
Primero perdón por no responder desde el mensaje original. Hace tiempo que había desactivado los mensajes de la lista, hoy los he vuelto a activar y he visto este mensaje en el archivo de la lista. AraDaen aradaen en gmail.com Jue Jun 21 19:17:45 EDT 2012 Hola, He instalado un servidor con Centos 6.2 para alojar varias webs que tengo, para lo que, entre otras cosas tengo bind configurado como servidor DNS y postfix con dovecot para el servicio de correo (pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps, smtp+tls). El sistema funciona perfectamente,sin habilitar iptables, pero cuando lo habilito, los correos que envío a dominios que no están alojados en mi servidor (gmail por ejemplo). Deduzco que se trata de la reglas para DNS cuando pregunta a otro servidor DNS, o de otra cosa que se me escapa. Este es el log de mail: Jun 21 13:48:45 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.94]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:48:45 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx1.hotmail.com[65.55.37.72]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.72]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:15 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.110]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:45 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.110]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:45 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.126]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:50:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.37.104]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:50:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: 8E2F954286D5: to=aradaen en hotmail.com, relay=none, delay=62560, delays=62410/0.11/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.37.104]:25: Connection timed out) Cualquier ayuda, será bienvenida. La política por defecto en iptables es DROP, y este es el script de iptables: #!/bin/sh iptables -F iptables -X iptables -Z iptables -t nat -F echo Política por defecto DROP iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP #Conexiones Locales echo Habilitando acceso: echo - Conexiones locales iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT #DNS echo - DNS (53) iptables -A OUTPUT -p ALL -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp -d 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p ALL -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -j ACCEPT #YUM echo - YUM # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 443 -j ACCEPT #WEB echo - WEB (80) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 443 -j ACCEPT #SSH echo - SSH (2233) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 2233 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 2233 -j ACCEPT # CORREO echo - MAIL; echo- POP3,POP3S (110,995) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 110 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 110 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 995 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 995 -j ACCEPT echo- IMAP,IMAPS (143,993) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 143 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 143 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 993 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 993 -j ACCEPT echo- SMTP,SMPTS (25,465) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 25 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 465 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 465 -j ACCEPT El problema esta aquí. Las reglas INPUT son correctas pero las OUTPUT no. Las conexiones SMTP que tu servidor realiza no salen por el puerto 25 sino que van dirigidas al puerto 25. La regla correcta seria: iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp dport 25 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp dport 465 -j ACCEPT echo- Submission (587) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 587 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 587 -j ACCEPT Y acabo de darme cuenta que has cometido el mismo error en otras reglas: POP3, IMAP, SMTP... Ademas, para WEB, POP3, IMAP y SMTP no te hacen falta las reglas OUTPUT gracias a primera regla iptables -A OUTPUT -p ALL -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED que permite toda conexión de salida que que previamente haya sido
Re: [CentOS-es] IPTables, DNS y postfix
Muchas gracias Francesc! Ya funciona perfectamente con el cambio del puerto en las reglas (destino/origen). Pero he comprado que si omito las reglas de salida dando por hecho que con la primera regla de las conexiones establecidas, se permitirá la salida, las conexiones se siguen bloqueando y obtengo un bonito Connection timed out: Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20057]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@hotmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.05/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.55.92.184]:25: Connection timed out) Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@gmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.04/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out) Las he agregado de nuevo y funciona correctamente. On 06/22/2012 12:48 PM, Guitart Francesc wrote: Primero perdón por no responder desde el mensaje original. Hace tiempo que había desactivado los mensajes de la lista, hoy los he vuelto a activar y he visto este mensaje en el archivo de la lista. AraDaen aradaen en gmail.com Jue Jun 21 19:17:45 EDT 2012 Hola, He instalado un servidor con Centos 6.2 para alojar varias webs que tengo, para lo que, entre otras cosas tengo bind configurado como servidor DNS y postfix con dovecot para el servicio de correo (pop3, pop3s, imap, imaps, smtp+tls). El sistema funciona perfectamente,sin habilitar iptables, pero cuando lo habilito, los correos que envío a dominios que no están alojados en mi servidor (gmail por ejemplo). Deduzco que se trata de la reglas para DNS cuando pregunta a otro servidor DNS, o de otra cosa que se me escapa. Este es el log de mail: Jun 21 13:48:45 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.94]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:48:45 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx1.hotmail.com[65.55.37.72]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.72]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:15 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.110]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:45 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.54.188.110]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:49:45 server postfix/smtp[13918]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.54.188.126]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:50:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.37.104]:25: Connection timed out Jun 21 13:50:15 server postfix/smtp[13917]: 8E2F954286D5: to=aradaen en hotmail.com, relay=none, delay=62560, delays=62410/0.11/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx2.hotmail.com[65.55.37.104]:25: Connection timed out) Cualquier ayuda, será bienvenida. La política por defecto en iptables es DROP, y este es el script de iptables: #!/bin/sh iptables -F iptables -X iptables -Z iptables -t nat -F echo Política por defecto DROP iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP #Conexiones Locales echo Habilitando acceso: echo - Conexiones locales iptables -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o lo -j ACCEPT #DNS echo - DNS (53) iptables -A OUTPUT -p ALL -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -d 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p udp -d 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p ALL -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -m state --state NEW -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p udp -s 0.0.0.0/0 --destination-port 53 -j ACCEPT #YUM echo - YUM # iptables -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT # iptables -A OUTPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp -m tcp -m state --state NEW --dport 443 -j ACCEPT #WEB echo - WEB (80) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 80 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 443 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 443 -j ACCEPT #SSH echo - SSH (2233) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 2233 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 2233 -j ACCEPT # CORREO echo - MAIL; echo- POP3,POP3S (110,995) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 110 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 110 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 995 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -p tcp --sport 995 -j ACCEPT echo- IMAP,IMAPS (143,993) iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 143 -j ACCEPT
Re: [CentOS-es] IPTables, DNS y postfix
Le 22/06/2012 13:21, AraDaen a écrit : Muchas gracias Francesc! Ya funciona perfectamente con el cambio del puerto en las reglas (destino/origen). Pero he comprado que si omito las reglas de salida dando por hecho que con la primera regla de las conexiones establecidas, se permitirá la salida, las conexiones se siguen bloqueando y obtengo un bonito Connection timed out: Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20057]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@hotmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.05/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.55.92.184]:25: Connection timed out) Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@gmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.04/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out) Las he agregado de nuevo y funciona correctamente. Perdón por la equivocación. Las reglas OUTPUT que puedes obviar son las de los apartados WEB, POP3 e IMAP. Tu servidor debe poder iniciar conexiones al puerto 25 de otros servidores de correo o sea que efectivamente no basta con una regla que permita las conexiones anteriormente establecidas por un cliente, ya que en este caso el cliente es tu servidor. En cambio, tu servidor nunca iniciará una conexión WEB, POP3 o IMAP hacia un cliente. Es siempre el cliente quien hace la primera solicitud y a partir de ese momento esta autorizado el camino de regreso (del servidor al cliente) gracias a la regla ESTABLISHED y RELATED. Espero haberme explicado. -- Francesc Guitart Service CRI ENISE ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] IPTables, DNS y postfix
On 06/22/2012 02:24 PM, Guitart Francesc wrote: Le 22/06/2012 13:21, AraDaen a écrit : Muchas gracias Francesc! Ya funciona perfectamente con el cambio del puerto en las reglas (destino/origen). Pero he comprado que si omito las reglas de salida dando por hecho que con la primera regla de las conexiones establecidas, se permitirá la salida, las conexiones se siguen bloqueando y obtengo un bonito Connection timed out: Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20057]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@hotmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.05/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to mx3.hotmail.com[65.55.92.184]:25: Connection timed out) Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out Jun 22 15:08:32 server postfix/smtp[20056]: 13751542940F: to=arad...@gmail.com, relay=none, delay=151, delays=0.39/0.04/150/0, dsn=4.4.1, status=deferred (connect to alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[173.194.79.27]:25: Connection timed out) Las he agregado de nuevo y funciona correctamente. Perdón por la equivocación. Las reglas OUTPUT que puedes obviar son las de los apartados WEB, POP3 e IMAP. Tu servidor debe poder iniciar conexiones al puerto 25 de otros servidores de correo o sea que efectivamente no basta con una regla que permita las conexiones anteriormente establecidas por un cliente, ya que en este caso el cliente es tu servidor. En cambio, tu servidor nunca iniciará una conexión WEB, POP3 o IMAP hacia un cliente. Es siempre el cliente quien hace la primera solicitud y a partir de ese momento esta autorizado el camino de regreso (del servidor al cliente) gracias a la regla ESTABLISHED y RELATED. Espero haberme explicado. Perfectamente. Muchas gracias!! -- www.aradaen.com - AraDaen sysadmin notes ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problemas para instalar el programa Gaussian
El 21 de junio de 2012 10:15, Luciano Andrés Chiarotto lachiaro...@gmail.com escribió: Hola Carlos. Gracias por tu respuesta. La página que vos me recomendas no encuentro el paquete perl-params-utils2. También lo busqué en yum search perl-params-utils2 # y no aparece. Estoy cometiendo algún error ? Nuevamente agradezco por tu respuesta y te mando un gran abrazo. Luciano El 19 de junio de 2012 17:14, Carlos Restrepo restrcar...@gmail.com escribió: El 19 de junio de 2012 14:02, Luciano Andrés Chiarotto lachiaro...@gmail.com escribió: Hola a todos. Tengo un problema para instalar el programa Gaussian 03 Los pasos que realizo son los siguiente. Viene un archivo que viene comprimido g03.tar.gz, lo descomprimo en la siguiente ruta /opt/ y creo un directorio llamado g03. Cambio los permisos de Grupo ... chown -R root:users g03 Luego, doy todos los permisos chmod 777 g03 Ejecuto script para que funcione el programa y calcule # ! /bin/sh source /opt/g03/bsd/g03.profile /opt/g03/g03 /tmp/ygg-IPCM-01.gjf Y me muestra este mensaje de error... /opt/g03/g03: error while loading shared libraries: util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Lo que hice fue agregar en el archivo /etc/profile las siguiente líneas. export PATH=$PATH:/opt/g03 LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/opt/g03 export LD_LIBRARY_PATH Pero sigue mostrando el mismo mensaje de error. /opt/g03/g03: error while loading shared libraries: util.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory El Centos que tengo instalado es ...CentOS 6.2 --- Linux 3.4.2-1.el6.elrepo.x86_64 Desde ya muchas gracias y si alguien lo tiene instalado les voy agradecer por su respuesta. Saludos Luciano ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Cordial saludo. Luciano, debes instalar el paquete que contenga la librería que te esta haciendo falta para que puedas terminar la instalación del producto. Buscando en rpm.pbone.net encontre que para centos 6 el paquete perl-params-utils2 contiene la librería que necesitas. Saludos. Carlos R!. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Luciano, mis disculpas por no explicarte bien como es la vuelta: 1. La pagina que te di te permite ademas de descargar paquetes (cuando CentOS no los trae en sus repos por default), el saber que paquete tiene la libereria que te hace falta. (es por esa razon que te di el link). 2. la liberia que te falta de acuerdo al error que pegaste en el correo es: util.so, para ubicarla entras al siguiente link: http://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/2/simple/2 en la caja de dialogo le escribes: util.so (este dato lo vi en tu correo, alli dice que le hace falta esta liberia) y seleccionas CentOS 6 para que solo busque alli. Te aparecera la lista de los paquetes que contienen esa libreria que le falta al producto que deseas instalar. debes visualizar algo como esto: Search results for *util.so* : Other ftp.icm.edu.pl/site/CPAN/authors/id/G/GR/GRAHAMC/ SiePerl-5.8.0-bin-1.0-Linux2.2.14.INSTALL.i386.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/230805/dir/other/com/SiePerl-5.8.0-bin-1.0-Linux2.2.14.INSTALL.i386.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/x86_64/rpmforge/RPMS/ perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16441049/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 dag.wieers.com/redhat/el5/en/x86_64/dag/RPMS/ perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16382472/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/i386/rpmforge/RPMS/ perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.i386.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16437269/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 dag.wieers.com/redhat/el5/en/i386/dag/RPMS/ perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.i386.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16367394/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Taint-Util-0.08-1.el5.rf.i386.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 apt.sw.be/redhat/el5/en/x86_64/rpmforge/RPMS/ perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.22-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16441014/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.22-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm.html RedHat EL 5 dag.wieers.com/redhat/el5/en/x86_64/dag/RPMS/ perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.22-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpmhttp://rpm.pbone.net/index.php3/stat/4/idpl/16382274/dir/redhat_el_5/com/perl-Scalar-List-Utils-1.22-1.el5.rf.x86_64.rpm.html RedHat
[CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2
Que tal estimados Les molesto por una cuestión, tengo un server con centos 6.2, se le configuró para servidor web, pero tenemos una aplicación hecha en java, lo que me esta demorando por la instalación del JDK, me pueden ayudar indicando como debo configurarlo en el server, se lo agradezco. -- Saludos Cordiales, Pablo Juca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2
Dale yum search openjdk, allí revisas los paquetes que necesitas. El 22 de junio de 2012 08:11, Pablo Juca psj...@gmail.com escribió: Que tal estimados Les molesto por una cuestión, tengo un server con centos 6.2, se le configuró para servidor web, pero tenemos una aplicación hecha en java, lo que me esta demorando por la instalación del JDK, me pueden ayudar indicando como debo configurarlo en el server, se lo agradezco. -- Saludos Cordiales, Pablo Juca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Cordialmente: Juan Pablo Botero Administrador de Sistemas informáticos Fedora Ambassador for Colombia http://www.jpilldev.net ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2
Juan Pablo, yo no he probado openjdk, pero si en varias oportunidades he trabajado con la distribucion de Sun/Oracle para Linux, funcioina perfectamente. En la doc. de instalacion le dice como configurar las variables de entorno que necesite (JAVA_HOME, CLASSPATH) Y las que ud. necesite para su aplicacion en particular. Si le da algun problema me comenta que de mañana al domingo voy a intalar un CEntos Completo. Saludos Richard Riveros Pineda De: Juan Pablo Botero juanpabloboterolo...@gmail.com Para: centos-es@centos.org Enviado: Viernes, 22 de junio, 2012 11:03 A.M. Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2 Dale yum search openjdk, allí revisas los paquetes que necesitas. El 22 de junio de 2012 08:11, Pablo Juca psj...@gmail.com escribió: Que tal estimados Les molesto por una cuestión, tengo un server con centos 6.2, se le configuró para servidor web, pero tenemos una aplicación hecha en java, lo que me esta demorando por la instalación del JDK, me pueden ayudar indicando como debo configurarlo en el server, se lo agradezco. -- Saludos Cordiales, Pablo Juca ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Cordialmente: Juan Pablo Botero Administrador de Sistemas informáticos Fedora Ambassador for Colombia http://www.jpilldev.net ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2
On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Pablo Juca wrote: Que tal estimados Les molesto por una cuestión, tengo un server con centos 6.2, se le configuró para servidor web, pero tenemos una aplicación hecha en java, lo que me esta demorando por la instalación del JDK, me pueden ayudar indicando como debo configurarlo en el server, se lo agradezco. Igual esto puede ayudarte http://www.aradaen.com/sysadmin/howto-instalacion-de-oracle-java-7-en-centos-y-fedora/ un saludo -- www.aradaen.com - AraDaen sysadmin notes ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Instalar y Configurar JDK en centos 6.2
El 22 de junio de 2012 12:34, AraDaen arad...@gmail.com escribió: On 06/22/2012 03:11 PM, Pablo Juca wrote: Que tal estimados Les molesto por una cuestión, tengo un server con centos 6.2, se le configuró para servidor web, pero tenemos una aplicación hecha en java, lo que me esta demorando por la instalación del JDK, me pueden ayudar indicando como debo configurarlo en el server, se lo agradezco. Igual esto puede ayudarte http://www.aradaen.com/sysadmin/howto-instalacion-de-oracle-java-7-en-centos-y-fedora/ un saludo -- www.aradaen.com - AraDaen sysadmin notes ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ejecuta: yum search jdk, e instala los siguientes paquetes (si tu arquitectura es de 64 bits, en caso contrario los de 32): - java-1.6.0-openjdk.x86_64 - java-1.6.0-openjdk-devel.x86_64 Funciona perfecto en CentOS 6.2 -- Carlos R!. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] 'yum update' rollback or .. ?
Hello, we have several physical servers (CentOS 5.*) with rather critical applications where (because of stability) we don't do regularly 'yum update'. In virtualized environemnts (under Vmware) we do a snapshot, then 'yum update', reboot and if something is wrong we rollback the snapshot. On physical servers we cannot do that. I have read about rollback option of rpm but not sure if this is reliable solution. What is your best practise regarding rollbacking 'yum update' on physical servers ? Regards Przemyslaw Bak (przemol) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 'yum update' rollback or .. ?
On 06/22/2012 09:42 AM, przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: Hello, we have several physical servers (CentOS 5.*) with rather critical applications where (because of stability) we don't do regularly 'yum update'. In virtualized environemnts (under Vmware) we do a snapshot, then 'yum update', reboot and if something is wrong we rollback the snapshot. On physical servers we cannot do that. I have read about rollback option of rpm but not sure if this is reliable solution. What is your best practise regarding rollbacking 'yum update' on physical servers ? One solution would be to use lvm snapshots. Create a snapshot of the root volume (lvcreate -s VolGroup00/LogVol00 -n rootsnapshot -L 10G), do an update and see if it works. If not, boot into rescue mode and copy the content from the snapshot back to the original. Make sure the snapshot gets the same size as the original volume. This is important if you want to copy back all the data. Theo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 'yum update' rollback or .. ?
On 22/6/2012 2:06 μμ, Theo Band wrote: What is your best practise regarding rollbacking 'yum update' on physical servers ? Assuming that you have problems due to a particular newly-installed package, you can downgrade: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage package-2.4.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm or: yum downgrade package (if it is in the repo) Since problems are usually introduced by a particular package (and not by all), this might be enough in most cases. Note, however, that dependencies are not resolved automatically with the above commands, so they must be handled manually. Another, more complete solution, of course, would be to have a full system backup (regardless whether the system is physical or virtual) and in case things go wrong, restore from backup (always a bit risky, I know - it makes you feel uneasy). We use mondorescue without problems (see: http://www.mondorescue.org/). I have been able to even use the backup to restore a KVM guest (using LVM) under VMware (you may see http://mondorescue-mailing-list.679749.n3.nabble.com/Mondo-devel-Restore-from-within-a-new-host-without-boot-td2251272.html). Or - if feasible - you can attempt to virtualize your physical server, either using mondorescue or VMware converter (or other commercial tools) and be ready to use the virtual machine instead. I am interested on other solutions too, so your thread is interesting! Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] SATA errors in log
Hi,
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps controller.
However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
-
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4 SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123
SControl 330)
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: configured for UDMA/133
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13: EH complete
---
Vendor ID : 1b4b
Device ID : 9123
I tried to see what drivers were currently being used but the command
below gave nothing
grep -i 1b4b /lib/modules/*/modules.alias | grep -i 9123
I have changed the card and cables but still get the same errors. I am
wondering if the el6 kernel is using the correct drivers I checked
elrepo against the Vendor:Device ID pairing and it also came up blank.
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 22.06.2012 13:58, schrieb Steve Brooks:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps controller.
However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
-
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4 SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123
SControl 330)
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: configured for UDMA/133
Jun 22 03:13:24 viz1 kernel: ata13: EH complete
---
Vendor ID : 1b4b
Device ID : 9123
I tried to see what drivers were currently being used but the command
below gave nothing
why do you care for drivers?
this looks like dying hard-drives are always looking in syslog
Hi Reindl,
I should have mentioned I swapped out the hard-drive and same errors on
new drive. I checked the SMART attributes of the drive and nothing
untoward, also executed the
smartctl -long
test wich came back error free.
Steve
--
Dr Stephen Brooks
http://www-solar.mcs.st-and.ac.uk/
Solar MHD Theory Group
Tel:: 01334 463735
Fax:: 01334 463748
E-mail :: ste...@mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk
---
Mathematical Institute
North Haugh
University of St. Andrews
St Andrews, Fife KY16 9SS
SCOTLAND
---
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] 'yum update' rollback or .. ?
On 06/22/2012 01:58 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: I am interested on other solutions too, so your thread is interesting! dump Assuming some form of ext[n] filesystem is being used. It has the advantage that is also works with incremental backups. You can dump the root file system and perhaps also the /boot filesystem. Instead of the root filesystem, I dump a snaphost that is created each evening. The snapshot has a frozen filesystem. So databases (mysql) should just be consistent. If you want to be 100% sure, stop the database, make a snapshot and start the database again. This is done within one second, so hardly any impact on the live server. Disadvantage of this method is that you still need the have a partition table if you need to fully restore. And LVM and boot sector need to be recreated. In case of disaster recovery you need this documented properly (try it out at least once). Advantage is that you can have daily system backups automatically created. Theo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cannot See Login Screen Anymore !!
Hi CentOS community Friends, It is CentOS 6.2 x86_64 machine, i have upgraded few packages using yum -y update, after the reboot machine does not show login screen, i have allowed enough time to show the screen that are about 2 hours. booting process does complete, it just hangs when it is about to show the screen. i tried to check by doing ssh for warring/error logs. nothing serious was there. but when i did the ssh to the server then i saw the following error. Prior to the upgrade machine was just okay.. ) MacBook-Pro:~ prabhpal$ ssh -l mike 41.211.25.233 mailer@41.211.25.233's password: -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied -bash: /dev/null: Permission denied Thanks / Nath ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
Bob Hoffman wrote: On 6/21/2012 12:44 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Bob Hoffman wrote: From: Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ *snip* Anything out there like that? http://www.changedetection.com/ snip As I said originally, you might want to check out rkhunter. It'll check your system for rootkits, and once configured - which isn't a big deal, just a configuration file - will complain when run if something's changed. You can tell it to look at your web pages. Another thing to consider (and I really, really don't enjoy suggesting it), is selinux. Turn it on to at least permissive, and it'll bitch and moan if something's changed. Turn it to enforcing, and *nothing* will be allowed to be changed. It is, however, a royal pain to configure, esp. when you want to be able to allow a directory for users to put pics. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps controller.
However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
-
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4 SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
snip
Crap. First question: what make model are the drives on it? If they're
Caviar Green, you're hosed. WD, and *maybe* Seagate as well, disabled a
certain function you used to be able to set on the lower cost,
consumer-grade models (in '09, I believe), and so when a server controller
is trying to do i/o, and has a problem, in server-grade drives, it gives
up after something like 6 sec, and does error handling, I *think* to other
sectors. The consumer ones, on the other hand, keep trying for 1? 2?
*minutes*; the disabled function allowed a used to tell it to give up in a
shorter time. Meanwhile, a hardware controller will, as I said, have fits.
mark you'd think I just spent months dealing with this
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps controller.
However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
-
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4 SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
snip
Crap. First question: what make model are the drives on it? If they're
Caviar Green, you're hosed. WD, and *maybe* Seagate as well, disabled a
certain function you used to be able to set on the lower cost,
consumer-grade models (in '09, I believe), and so when a server controller
is trying to do i/o, and has a problem, in server-grade drives, it gives
up after something like 6 sec, and does error handling, I *think* to other
sectors. The consumer ones, on the other hand, keep trying for 1? 2?
*minutes*; the disabled function allowed a used to tell it to give up in a
shorter time. Meanwhile, a hardware controller will, as I said, have fits.
mark you'd think I just spent months dealing with this
As mentioned in the original post the drives are all WD2003FYYS. I am
convinced it has nothing to do with TLER enabled on the WD drives as we
run hundreds of them using linux mdadm raid on motherboard SATA
controllers with no problems in the last eight or so years. This appears
to be specific to the SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by
Startech. There are four other HD's (WD2003FYYS) in the machine running on
an onboard Intel Corporation Patsburg 6-Port SATA AHCI Controller with
no problems.
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps
controller. However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4
SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA
QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
snip
Crap. First question: what make model are the drives on it? If they're
Caviar Green, you're hosed. WD, and *maybe* Seagate as well, disabled a
certain function you used to be able to set on the lower cost,
consumer-grade models (in '09, I believe), and so when a server
controller is trying to do i/o, and has a problem, in server-grade drives,
it gives up after something like 6 sec, and does error handling, I *
think* to other sectors. The consumer ones, on the other hand, keep trying
for 1? 2? *minutes*; the disabled function allowed a used to tell it to
give up in a shorter time. Meanwhile, a hardware controller will, as I
said,
have fits.
mark you'd think I just spent months dealing with this
As mentioned in the original post the drives are all WD2003FYYS. I am
Missed the original post; sorry.
convinced it has nothing to do with TLER enabled on the WD drives as we
Thanks, that was the acronym I was trying to remember.
run hundreds of them using linux mdadm raid on motherboard SATA
controllers with no problems in the last eight or so years. This appears
to be specific to the SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by
Startech. There are four other HD's (WD2003FYYS) in the machine running on
an onboard Intel Corporation Patsburg 6-Port SATA AHCI Controller with
no problems.
I also see those are enterprise drives, not consumer grade, which
implies that they ought to work. It still looks to me as though it's
timing out, which I'd think is a function of the RAID card. You might see
if it has any firmware configuration options.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Steve Brooks wrote:
I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The
kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as
Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123
I use it to provide extra SATA ports to a raid system.
The HD's are all WD2003FYYS and so run at 3Gbps on the 6Gbps
controller. However I am seeing lots of instances of errors like this
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x4
SErr
0x40 action 0x6 frozen
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: irq_stat 0x0800, interface
fatal error
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: SError: { Handshk }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA
QUEUED
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: cmd
61/e8:10:98:05:1b/01:00:66:00:00/40 tag 2 ncq 249856 out
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13.00: status: { DRDY }
Jun 22 03:13:23 viz1 kernel: ata13: hard resetting link
snip
Crap. First question: what make model are the drives on it? If they're
Caviar Green, you're hosed. WD, and *maybe* Seagate as well, disabled a
certain function you used to be able to set on the lower cost,
consumer-grade models (in '09, I believe), and so when a server
controller is trying to do i/o, and has a problem, in server-grade drives,
it gives up after something like 6 sec, and does error handling, I *
think* to other sectors. The consumer ones, on the other hand, keep trying
for 1? 2? *minutes*; the disabled function allowed a used to tell it to
give up in a shorter time. Meanwhile, a hardware controller will, as I
said,
have fits.
mark you'd think I just spent months dealing with this
As mentioned in the original post the drives are all WD2003FYYS. I am
Missed the original post; sorry.
convinced it has nothing to do with TLER enabled on the WD drives as we
Thanks, that was the acronym I was trying to remember.
run hundreds of them using linux mdadm raid on motherboard SATA
controllers with no problems in the last eight or so years. This appears
to be specific to the SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by
Startech. There are four other HD's (WD2003FYYS) in the machine running on
an onboard Intel Corporation Patsburg 6-Port SATA AHCI Controller with
no problems.
I also see those are enterprise drives, not consumer grade, which
implies that they ought to work. It still looks to me as though it's
timing out, which I'd think is a function of the RAID card. You might see
if it has any firmware configuration options.
Thanks for the reply, the card is purely JBOD no RAID or other
configuration available. It simply posts the SATA devices attached to the
OS. I am wondering if it could be a strange symptom of running SATA3
drives on this particular SATA6 controller but that is just a stab in the
dark.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] converting .doc to html
Anyone got a preferred program or package for this? I'd like a *good* one, and Word or OO.o's save as html in no way qualifies as other than amateur crap. So far, with a little googling, I've found the wv package. wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . mark what, ask for an opinion in this shy, diffident group? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 Is this your card? http://www.startech.com/Cards-Adapters/HDD-Controllers/SATA-Cards/4-Port-PCI-Express-SATA-III-6Gbps-Controller-Card-with-eSATA-PCIe-4-Line~PEXSAT34 mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 Is this your card? Hi Mark, Yes that is the very card, the page says the chipset is Marvell 88SE9128 but lspci shows Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 Is this your card? Hi Mark, Yes that is the very card, the page says the chipset is Marvell 88SE9128 but lspci shows Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller It is odd because the kernel reports it as 88SE9123 the web page says it is 88SE9128 as does the manual supplied with the card. Now the motherboard already has an onboard Marvell 88SE9128 controller which is correctly identified by the kernel and works properly so I know the correct divers are in the kernel but the Startech card does not seem to be using them. [root@viz1 ~]# lspci | grep SATA 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Patsburg 6-Port SATA AHCI Controller (rev 05) 04:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller (rev 11) 05:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller (rev 11) 0f:00.0 SATA controller: ASMedia Technology Inc. ASM1062 Serial ATA Controller (rev 01) 10:00.0 SATA controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9128 PCIe SATA 6 Gb/s RAID controller with HyperDuo (rev 11) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org From: m.r...@5-cent.us Subject: [CentOS] converting .doc to html Anyone got a preferred program or package for this? I'd like a *good* one, and Word or OO.o's save as html in no way qualifies as other than amateur crap. So far, with a little googling, I've found the wv package. wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . I think Abiword can read and write those formats. [root@karsites ~]# rpm -qv abiword abiword-2.6.6-1.el5.rf HTH Keith --- Websites: http://www.karsites.net http://www.php-debuggers.net http://www.raised-from-the-dead.org.uk All email addresses are challenge-response protected with TMDA [http://tmda.net] --- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
Keith Roberts wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: From: m.r...@5-cent.us Anyone got a preferred program or package for this? I'd like a *good* one, and Word or OO.o's save as html in no way qualifies as other than amateur crap. So far, with a little googling, I've found the wv package. wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . I think Abiword can read and write those formats. Given that both Word and OO.o produce such lousy, uselessly cluttered html, I'm a tad loathe to install another wp... and I really just wanted a command line conversion tool. As a side note, I tried quanta about 6 years ago, and that did lousy things to my html, too (going from edit to display and back, I think it was, unformatted the *whole* document, left justifying all, even when I *told* it to leave formatting...), so I'm not wildly crazed with web editing programs. As my own personal web page reads, this page proudly built in vi mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
Hi, Steve, Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 Is this your card? Yes that is the very card, the page says the chipset is Marvell 88SE9128 but lspci shows Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller It is odd because the kernel reports it as 88SE9123 the web page says it is 88SE9128 as does the manual supplied with the card. Now the Yeah, I noticed that too, and thought it odd. snip I looked at the manual, and the only thing that came to mind was to try going into the BIOS and making sure that it was set to AHCI rather than, say, IDE, or whatever. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
On 22.6.2012 03:34, Kahlil Hodgson wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Bob Hoffman wrote: Subject: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ If its a security thing, you probably want an host based IDS. I know this under the term file based IDS btw., in contrast to some stuff that scans the network traffic. Samhain (http://la-samhna.de/samhain/) tripwire and aide were two other examples and even with bacula you can do this stuff. All these tools scan the filesystem and store things like checksum, ownership, size etc. in a database. One important feature in my opinion is that the database is not stored on the client itself. You don't want an intruder to get on that data, similar to why one wants a central logserver. To no avail do reinvent the wheel, there are plenty of tools for that. -- Kind Regards, Markus Falb signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 88, Issue 13
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2012:1029 CentOS 5 file FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 11:08:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1029 CentOS 5 file FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120622110841.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1029
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1029.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
8a98e586acca5ff300dac78f6f2cd2548001ff3f2f946e7c26613864f950102a
file-4.17-28.i386.rpm
x86_64:
50b33ade3d9a0209e2a7225ed959fd8ce9d6173ab279bca9a6738797d1acd26f
file-4.17-28.x86_64.rpm
Source:
690888b77be34b978a454a3c03705b4bbd7c2ac5bdf4cef13221f6c1c3837074
file-4.17-28.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 88, Issue 13
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 9:40 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Anyone got a preferred program or package for this? I'd like a *good* one, and Word or OO.o's save as html in no way qualifies as other than amateur crap. So far, with a little googling, I've found the wv package. wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . Mail it to yourself on a gmail account, then 'view' the attachment instead of downloading the original. It is still going to have div's though. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SATA errors in log
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hi, Steve, Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Steve Brooks wrote: I have a SATA PCIe 6Gbps 4 port controller card made by Startech. The kernel (Linux viz1 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64) sees it as Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 Is this your card? Yes that is the very card, the page says the chipset is Marvell 88SE9128 but lspci shows Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE9123 PCIe SATA 6.0 Gb/s controller It is odd because the kernel reports it as 88SE9123 the web page says it is 88SE9128 as does the manual supplied with the card. Now the Yeah, I noticed that too, and thought it odd. snip I looked at the manual, and the only thing that came to mind was to try going into the BIOS and making sure that it was set to AHCI rather than, say, IDE, or whatever. Thanks Mark for the reply , I hadn't thought about the card posting drives in the bios, I assumed only the onboard SATA devices would allow you change the mode in the motherboard's BIOS. I will have a look on Monday to see if anything has appeared in the BIOS. I guess the default mode in a SATA6 card would be AHCI but yes worth a check. Cheers, Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
On 6/22/2012 9:50 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bob Hoffman wrote: On 6/21/2012 12:44 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Bob Hoffman wrote: From: Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com Not sure if there is an app like this yet. I want to keep tabs on my web applications and thought of using a 'page checker'/ *snip* Anything out there like that? http://www.changedetection.com/ snip As I said originally, you might want to check out rkhunter. It'll check your system for rootkits, and once configured - which isn't a big deal, just a configuration file - will complain when run if something's changed. You can tell it to look at your web pages. Another thing to consider (and I really, really don't enjoy suggesting it), is selinux. Turn it on to at least permissive, and it'll bitch and moan if something's changed. Turn it to enforcing, and *nothing* will be allowed to be changed. It is, however, a royal pain to configure, esp. when you want to be able to allow a directory for users to put pics. mark Would love to use SElinux. I searched high and low for any kind of manual and there was none. Most of the information online was for versions that were not on centos 6, and little info on centos 6. I am considering going back to it for the virtual hosts, dns servers, but for production web servers I think it will take a long time. I know that fail2ban will not work properly with it in any case, as per their own website. It seems that to run the webservers selinux wants me to allow a ton of privledges to apache, the ftp user, and a bunch of other things...seems like that defeats the purpose. And a script injection will have all those privledges. I wish I had to time and knowledge to implement it...and add it to my handbook, but on a webserver that is doing mail ins, mail outs, httpd, mysql, php, self made scripts, fail2ban, and host of other programs it seems like it requires an experienced hand at it. Or a book. Neither of which are available to me. Who knows, once I figure out the mutli_mysql back up, amanda, then I may go for it. One thing I learned...SElinux in permissive mode only gives a warning once for an issue...and never again. Makes it hard to play with it that way, would prefer a constant error variable to keep them coming. well. We derailed. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Bob Hoffman b...@bobhoffman.com wrote: It seems that to run the webservers selinux wants me to allow a ton of privledges to apache, the ftp user, and a bunch of other things...seems like that defeats the purpose. And a script injection will have all those privledges. No, selinux doesn't give 'extra' privileges to anything. It adds extra restrictions based on the context of the processes and the files/directories besides the ones based on uid/gid. I wish I had to time and knowledge to implement it...and add it to my handbook, but on a webserver that is doing mail ins, mail outs, httpd, mysql, php, self made scripts, fail2ban, and host of other programs it seems like it requires an experienced hand at it. Or a book. Yes, it has taken years to get just the standard distributed packages configured correctly - and that's probably with expert advice available to the packagers... You can't just drop it in on top of stuff that has evolved organically for years. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
On 22/6/2012 9:28 μμ, Bob Hoffman wrote: it seems like it requires an experienced hand at it. Or a book. Some googling took me to: http://www.freetechbooks.com/the-selinux-notebook-the-foundations-t785.html It seems interesting and comprehensive from a quick browsing. And it's public domain too. Yet, I agree that SElinux is a pain. There are other measures to keep things under control. Unless you know what you are doing with it, selinux is going to produce trouble and only trouble. That's my experience. (I don't know if I'll ever find the significant time needed to invest in knowing selinux well enough to use it in production.) Nick ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On 6/22/2012 8:40 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . You mean rdquo;? What's wrong with that? You wanted HTML, and *any* browser will understand that HTML entity, even Lynx. If you wanted HTML I can read like an e-book, I'd say you should be converting to Markdown instead. One path from Word to Markdown would be unrtf (https://www.gnu.org/software/unrtf/) to HTML, then HTML to Markdown via Pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] reinventing the wheel? page checker
Bob Hoffman wrote: On 6/22/2012 9:50 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Bob Hoffman wrote: On 6/21/2012 12:44 PM, Keith Roberts wrote: On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, Bob Hoffman wrote: From: Bob Hoffmanb...@bobhoffman.com snip Another thing to consider (and I really, really don't enjoy suggesting it), is selinux. Turn it on to at least permissive, and it'll bitch and moan if something's changed. Turn it to enforcing, and *nothing* will be allowed to be changed. It is, however, a royal pain to configure, esp. when you want to be able to allow a directory for users to put pics. Would love to use SElinux. I searched high and low for any kind of manual and there was none. Look for RHEL's 5 or 6; there's professional documentation. Not that anything's that wonderful. There's also the selinux list. snip One thing I learned...SElinux in permissive mode only gives a warning once for an issue...and never again. Makes it hard to play with it that way, would prefer a constant error variable to keep them coming. Not true. It will issue an AVC every time something tries to happen. Big things to know: a) ll -Z shows you the selinux context b) chcon [-R] -[urt] whatever file or directory c) getsebool and setsebool mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
Warren Young wrote: On 6/22/2012 8:40 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . You mean rdquo;? Yup. What's wrong with that? You wanted HTML, and *any* browser will understand that HTML entity, even Lynx. Hate it. I think it's completely unnecessary. I've done web pages, including professional and corporate ones, and never needed it. I use special characters only when there's no other option. If you wanted HTML I can read like an e-book, I'd say you should be converting to Markdown instead. One path from Word to Markdown would be unrtf (https://www.gnu.org/software/unrtf/) to HTML, then HTML to Markdown via Pandoc (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/). How 'bout html I can read like wordperfect alt-f3? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:40:49 -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hate it. I think it's completely unnecessary. I've done web pages, including professional and corporate ones, and never needed it. I use special characters only when there's no other option. Just use sed to change it to whatever you want it to be. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW POWER! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] basic auth fails
Am 21.06.2012 16:03, schrieb Tim Dunphy: Hello, I've setup apache basic auth on by web server to protect my nagios site. It's been working just fine, but suddenly it stopped accepting passwords even tho they are being typed in correctly. I was wondering if I could get some advice on how to troubleshoot this? I'm on a centos 5.4 machine No, you are not. Linux 2.6.21.7-2.fc8xen #1 SMP Fri Feb 15 12:34:28 EST 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Not a CentOS kernel and that one is highly vulnerable. Server version: Apache/2.2.21 (Unix) Server built: Nov 14 2011 18:03:07 Not a CentOS versions of Apache. A vulnerable Apache release. I don't see any indication in the logs as to why this may be happening, but it's possible I might not be looking for the right things. Thanks Tim Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On 6/22/2012 2:40 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Warren Young wrote: On 6/22/2012 8:40 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: wvHtml works, but I don't like the output - it insists on div, and on rhquo instead of plain, simple . You mean rdquo;? Yup. What's wrong with that? You wanted HTML, and *any* browser will understand that HTML entity, even Lynx. Hate it. I think it's completely unnecessary. Five centuries of typographers would like to have a word with you. rdquo; and aren't the same thing. If the document includes curly quotes, the only correct alternative available to the HTML converter is to put out Unicode character U+201D. Now, if your converter were converting straight quotation marks to quot;, you might have a point. I've done web pages, including professional and corporate ones, and never needed it. IMO, web pages with straight quotation marks are unprofessional. :) Let the ASCII go, Mark. Just let it go. Unicode became usable over a decade ago, and became solid in most programs years ago. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] converting .doc to html
On 6/22/2012 3:56 PM, Warren Young wrote: Unicode became usable over a decade ago, and became solid in most programs years ago. You know, thinking about it, I believe I've sold the Unicode on Linux stability story short. It's about a decade since it became solid, so usable must be considerably farther back; 2000, maybe? That makes sense, since Plan9 switched to UTF-8 in 1999. I use Perl as my benchmark for Unicode stability. RHEL 2.1 (March 2002) shipped Perl 5.6 (March 2000), which was usable but dodgy in some ways w.r.t. Unicode. RHEL 3 (October 2003) shipped Perl 5.8 (July 2002), which fixed almost everything with Unicode handling. Each Perl since then has had Unicode changes, but they've just been small bug fixes and updates to track new Unicode specs. The core mechanisms haven't changed since 5.8. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.2 on partitionable mdadm RAID1 (md_d0) - kernel panic with either disk not present
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Scott Silva ssi...@sgvwater.com wrote: on 6/20/2012 11:34 PM Arun Khan spake the following: On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:09 AM, Rob Kampen Just a shot in the dark... DO all the fstab entries call out md devices? Yes, /etc/fstab contains /dev/md_d0p1 for / partition. I have been doing some digging in the initramfs and the dracut script. The initramfs does contain all the md related stuff like drivers, the devices for md_d0 and the /etc/mdamd.conf. To the best of my knowledge these should be sufficient to load /dev/md_d0p1 (/). I have not had a thorough look at the dracut script though. I will post whatever relevant information if I find something that I don't quite understand. -- Arun Khan ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
