Re: [CentOS] after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Gary, > > Not sure if this is related, but it is the only thing sticking out: > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 01:24 +0300, Gary Trotcko wrote: >> libbz2.so.1.0 => not found > > bzip2-libs only provides libbz2.so.1 and libbz2.so.1.0.4, not > libbz2.sos.1.0. bzip2-devel doesn't provide it either, nor does any > other package. > > If you haven't installed bzip2-libs install it. If you still see that > "libbz2 not found" try (assuming you're on i386): > # cd /lib > # ln -s libbz2.so.1.0.4 libbz2.so.1.0 > > and see if that makes a difference. > > Since CentOS uses an unaltered SRPM for bzip2 you can be pretty sure Red > Hat does not provide that link either. Which means that dependency is a > "chromism", i.e. a bug in Chrome, possibly due to a build system with a > modified bzip2. > > You could also try booting a stock kernel, not a centosplus one. The bzip2-libs is installed at my system but libbz2.so.1.0 didn't exist so I've created symlink and it hasn't effect: $ ldd /opt/google/chrome/chrome | grep libbz /opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) /opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x001af000) -- Best Regards, Gary Trotcko ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
Hello Gary, On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:46 +0300, Gary Trotcko wrote: > The bzip2-libs is installed at my system but libbz2.so.1.0 didn't > exist so I've created symlink and it hasn't effect: > $ ldd /opt/google/chrome/chrome | grep libbz > /opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information > available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) > /opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information > available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) > libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x001af000) Ok, so adding that symlink does not make Chrome happy to the point where it starts working? Still that requirement is a bug and suggests that google uses an unclean (i.e. patched) build system, not a stock RHEL or CentOS. As people pointed out that libz warning in itself is probably harmless. All that is left is to repeat my advise: If the suggestions given here do not fix your issue you might want to take it to a Chrome specific list. If you do take your issue there, please mention the bogus requirement on libbz2.so.1.0 and point out that that link is *not* available on stock CentOS 6 (and in all likeliness neither on RHEL 6) systems. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] after last update google-chrome no runs anymore
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Gary, > > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 11:46 +0300, Gary Trotcko wrote: > >>The bzip2-libs is installed at my system but libbz2.so.1.0 didn't >>exist so I've created symlink and it hasn't effect: >>$ ldd /opt/google/chrome/chrome | grep libbz >>/opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information >>available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) >>/opt/google/chrome/chrome: /lib/libz.so.1: no version information >>available (required by /opt/google/chrome/chrome) >> libbz2.so.1.0 => /lib/libbz2.so.1.0 (0x001af000) > > > Ok, so adding that symlink does not make Chrome happy to the point where > it starts working? Still that requirement is a bug and suggests that > google uses an unclean (i.e. patched) build system, not a stock RHEL or > CentOS. > > As people pointed out that libz warning in itself is probably harmless. > > All that is left is to repeat my advise: If the suggestions given here > do not fix your issue you might want to take it to a Chrome specific > list. If you do take your issue there, please mention the bogus > requirement on libbz2.so.1.0 and point out that that link is *not* > available on stock CentOS 6 (and in all likeliness neither on RHEL 6) > systems. The google-chrome-stable RPM creates the symlink /opt/google/chrome/libbz2.so.1.0 to /lib/libbz2.so.1 - and the google-chrome wrapper sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /opt/google/chrome - so chrome finds libbz2.so.1.0 without a problem. i.e. there isn't a problem with either libbz2.so.1.0 or libz.so.1 If chrome is not starting, then there is probably another issue - you could try moving the preferences/profile out of the way - e.g. cd $HOME/.config mv google-chrome google-chrome.save and try again If that doesn't help, try running chrome through strace and see if that gives any clues ... James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
OS CentOS-6.2 with updates to present. I use git on this host to manage configuration changes and to monitor package alterations. This is not meant to be a security check. It is simply a way for me to easily recover from fumble fingered configuration changes. Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed since the previous commit: # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim # modified: ../usr/bin/vim I therefore reinstalled these three packages using yum reinstall and committed the change to git. commit b87a8b2116ef22cc013fd5dc6f525d672d52570a Author: sysadmin.root.vhost01.hamilton ..." to update what will be committed) # (use "git checkout -- ..." to discard changes in working directory) # # modified: ../etc/virsh.run # modified: .Xauthority # modified: .bash_history # modified: ../selinux/policy # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim # modified: ../usr/bin/vim # # Untracked files: # (use "git add ..." to include in what will be committed) # # ../.readahead_collect When I check the differences git simply reports that the binary files are difference but, after I reinstalled them all yesterday I noted that the file modification times of the replaced files and their respective reinstalled files were the same but their file sizes were not. Given what I have committed to the git repository I am satisfied that these are the only system files that have changed. None of the files in /var/log show any entries relating to these files immediately prior to the reinstall yesterday. What entries do exist go back to when the software was first installed and none are more recent than several months ago. The git commit on this host previous to yesterday was the Kernel update on June 19. At that time the subject files were the same as when they were originally installed. This host does not accept any direct IP connections from IP addresses outside our internal server subnet (a.b.c.0/192). Access is blocked via IPTables at the gateway and again on the host itself. Some VM guests do allow public or otherwise less restricted access but the VM host itself does not. I am of course deeply suspicious of these circumstances but I cannot see how this could be the result of some outside agency. Therefore, I am at a loss to explain these changes. What I need to discover is what agency changed these files and why. In the meantime I have removed the gdb, vim-enhanced and vim-X11 packages from that host. Has anyone else run across this sort of behaviour? Has anyone any idea as to what is going on here? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
From: James B. Byrne > Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed > since the previous commit: > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > > # modified: ../etc/virsh.run > # modified: .Xauthority > # modified: .bash_history > # modified: ../selinux/policy > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > # > When I check the differences git simply reports that the binary files > are difference but, after I reinstalled them all yesterday I noted > that the file modification times of the replaced files and their > respective reinstalled files were the same but their file sizes were > not. Did you rpm verify? # rpm -qV vim-enhanced # rpm -qV gdb Did you diff the text files? Did you "binary diff" the binaries? How many bytes difference? constant number? JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:53:09AM -0700, John Doe wrote: > From: James B. Byrne > > > Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed > > since the previous commit: > > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > > > > # modified: ../etc/virsh.run > > # modified: .Xauthority > > # modified: .bash_history > > # modified: ../selinux/policy > > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > > # > > When I check the differences git simply reports that the binary files > > are difference but, after I reinstalled them all yesterday I noted > > that the file modification times of the replaced files and their > > respective reinstalled files were the same but their file sizes were > > not. > > Did you rpm verify? > # rpm -qV vim-enhanced > # rpm -qV gdb > Did you diff the text files? > Did you "binary diff" the binaries? > How many bytes difference? constant number? > > JD prelink??? -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - The Lord is like a strong tower. Those who do what is right can run to him for safety. --- Proverbs 18:10 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Question about FASTTRACK, was [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update (fwd)
Greetings,
Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo?
Thanks.
Max Pyziur
p...@brama.com
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:29:52 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Reply-To: centos@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1035
Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1035.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
fa2d0bd6c2f94951334aec309dc2c0a54a1bf04e28b7519dc868456a803875ac
telnet-0.17-41.el5.i386.rpm
b81346fbbbfa9aabe0cce730c4625498786009306275d5045b590a91e981367d
telnet-server-0.17-41.el5.i386.rpm
x86_64:
afe58abdf22e286fb825dd4f321c748d5c0a09dbad7174ba97db75608a0c4672
telnet-0.17-41.el5.x86_64.rpm
3cc350f4ced6c5623a9d687be4a3a7cbce8dc4858792896d68ca2f2527402a75
telnet-server-0.17-41.el5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
8b7a9891f410718c09b306cb84a3f2bd02bb5517ecbe58467a86d58ba1ce829d
telnet-0.17-41.el5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about FASTTRACK, was [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update (fwd)
From: Max Pyziur > Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo? Google "centos fasttrack"... ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
From: fred smith > On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:53:09AM -0700, John Doe wrote: >> From: James B. Byrne >> > Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed >> > since the previous commit: >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim >> > >> > # modified: ../etc/virsh.run >> > # modified: .Xauthority >> > # modified: .bash_history >> > # modified: ../selinux/policy >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim >> > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim >> > # >> > When I check the differences git simply reports that the binary files >> > are difference but, after I reinstalled them all yesterday I noted >> > that the file modification times of the replaced files and their >> > respective reinstalled files were the same but their file sizes were >> > not. >> >> Did you rpm verify? >> # rpm -qV vim-enhanced >> # rpm -qV gdb >> Did you diff the text files? >> Did you "binary diff" the binaries? >> How many bytes difference? constant number? > > prelink??? I do not think prelink would alter text configuration files like .Xauthority or .bash_history JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Question about FASTTRACK, was [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1035 CentOS 5 telnet FASTTRACK Update (fwd)
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Max Pyziur wrote: > > Greetings, > Are FASTTRACK updates delivered by way of a different repo? Yes. http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories?action=show -- William Hooper ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
On Wed, July 4, 2012 11:51, John Doe wrote: > From: fred smith > >> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:53:09AM -0700, John Doe wrote: >>> >>> Did you rpm verify? >>> # rpm -qV vim-enhanced Yes >>> # rpm -qV gdb Yes >>> Did you diff the text files? The files other than those in /usr/bin I know the cause of their alteration. It is caused by my ssh accesses. >>> Did you "binary diff" the binaries? No >>> How many bytes difference? constant number? >> >> prelink??? It seems so: [root@vhost01 ~]# yum install gdb . . . [root@vhost01 ~]# ll /usr/bin/gdb -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4453160 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb [root@vhost01 ~]# mv /usr/bin/gdb /usr/bin/gdb.cln [root@vhost01 ~]# cp -p /usr/bin/gdb.cln /usr/bin/gdb [root@vhost01 ~]# ll /usr/bin/gdb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4453160 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root1061 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb-add-index -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4453160 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb.cln lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 3 Jul 4 14:16 /usr/bin/gdbtui -> gdb [root@vhost01 ~]# prelink -v /usr/bin/gdb Prelinking /usr/bin/gdb [root@vhost01 ~]# ll /usr/bin/gdb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4468992 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root1061 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb-add-index -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4453160 Dec 7 2011 /usr/bin/gdb.cln lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 3 Jul 4 14:16 /usr/bin/gdbtui -> gdb Which accounts for the size changes as far as I can see. I infer that the linked sizes likely changed as a result of system library updates associated with the recent kernel update. Thank you for the help. > > I do not think prelink would alter text configuration files like > .Xauthority or .bash_history Those files I expected to change and I am aware of the the cause. It is only the files in /usr/bin that concern me. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange alterations to vim and related packages on KVM host
On 07/05/2012 03:51 AM, John Doe wrote: From: fred smith On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:53:09AM -0700, John Doe wrote: From: James B. Byrne > Yesterday git status reported that the following files had changed > since the previous commit: > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > > # modified: ../etc/virsh.run > # modified: .Xauthority > # modified: .bash_history > # modified: ../selinux/policy > # modified: ../usr/bin/gdb > # modified: ../usr/bin/gvim > # modified: ../usr/bin/vim > # > When I check the differences git simply reports that the binary files > are difference but, after I reinstalled them all yesterday I noted > that the file modification times of the replaced files and their > respective reinstalled files were the same but their file sizes were > not. Did you rpm verify? # rpm -qV vim-enhanced # rpm -qV gdb Did you diff the text files? Did you "binary diff" the binaries? How many bytes difference? constant number? prelink??? I do not think prelink would alter text configuration files like .Xauthority or .bash_history No - the simple act of logging in did that - my vote is for prelink - git is probably unaware of prelink. JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] fpaste-server pastebin service
Hi, Any step by step guide for setting up fpaste-server on CentOS 5.8? Regards Kaushal ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
