[CentOS-announce] Release for CentOS-6.3 i386 and x86_64
We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of CentOS-6.3 for i386 and x86_64 Architectures. Release Notes for 6.3 are available at http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOS6.3 - we recommend everyone looks through those once. CentOS-6.3 is based on the upstream release EL 6.3 and includes packages from all variants. All upstream repositories have been combined into one, to make it easier for end users to work with. All updates released since upstream 6.3 release are also released to the CentOS-6.3 mirrors. +++ Upgrading from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5: We recommend everyone run through a reinstall rather than attempt an inplace upgrade from CentOS-4 or CentOS-5. +++ Upgrading from CentOS-6.0 / 6.1 or 6.2 Unless you have edited your yum configs, a 'yum update' should move your machine seamlessly from any previous CentOS-6.x release to CentOS-6.3 +++ Downloading CentOS-6.3 for new installs: When possible, consider using torrents to run the downloads. Usually its also the fastest means to download the distro. Torrent files for the DVD's are available at : http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/isos/i386/CentOS-6.3-i386-bin-DVD1to2.torrent http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6.3/isos/x86_64/CentOS-6.3-x86_64-bin-DVD1to2.torrent You can also use a mirror close to you : http://www.centos.org/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=30 Most mirrors will allow direct DVD downloads over http, ftp and rsync. Please keep in mind that not all mirrors are currently updated, some might take upto another 24 hours before they have all the content. We have also made efforts to try and ensure that most install types and roles can be run from DVD-1 itself. +++ sha1sum for the CentOS-6.3 ISOS: i386: 541f98e36a7034ab3b470ddf5e2232df3829983e CentOS-6.3-i386-bin-DVD1.iso 44d9e8652af683b844138ea2ea03e6772c18a613 CentOS-6.3-i386-bin-DVD2.iso c596411085110dbb67fb030e667ae054afb413c8 CentOS-6.3-i386-minimal.iso 51dcbf68ddc0fc2907ecbba055bf041dc8ae7ca9 CentOS-6.3-i386-netinstall.iso x86_64: eaa52f3d1ccf2df3b03e064fb0fa6168be28a4d4 CentOS-6.3-x86_64-bin-DVD1.iso 29eee5946372ed29de509b9604d895b99d36a33f CentOS-6.3-x86_64-bin-DVD2.iso 09801301433c8dc1a93d732790f9a4d8ca7895e6 CentOS-6.3-x86_64-minimal.iso c85069ee289d6eb279ba1c1ab0c259513302b8fd CentOS-6.3-x86_64-netinstall.iso +++ Sources and Debuginfo packages: SRPMS and debuginfo packages are released to vault.centos.org. +++ LiveCD and LiveDVD We will be releasing the LiveCD and LiveDVD images in the next few days for both i386 and x86_64. +++ CentOS on PowerPC Work is under-way to bring CentOS-6 to the powerpc platform and we hope to have a Beta CentOS-6.3 release by the end of August. +++ Getting Help: The best place to start when looking for help with CentOS is at the wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/GettingHelp ) which lists various options and communities who might be able to help. If you think there is a bug in the system, do report it at http://bugs.centos.org/ - but keep in mind that the bugs system is *not* a support mechanism. +++ Contributing and joining the project: We are always looking for people to join and help with various things in the project. If you are keen to help out a good place to start is the wiki page at http://wiki.centos.org/Contribute . If you have questions or a specific area you would like to contribute towards that is not covered on that page, feel free to drop in on #centos-de...@irc.freenode.net for a chat or email the centos-devel list (http://lists.centos.org). +++ Thanks to everyone who contributed towards making CentOS 6.3, specially the effort put in, as always, by the QA team. A special shout out to all the donors who have contributed hardware, network connectivity, hosting and resources over the years. The CentOS project now has a fairly well setup resource pool, purely thanks to the donors. Enjoy! -- Karanbir Singh kbsi...@centos.org The CentOS Project {http://www.centos.org} irc: z00...@irc.freenode.net ( #centos, #centos-devel ) ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Shorewall me genera muchos log en /var/log/messages
Gracias por sus respuestas a todos por sus respuestas, al final he utilizado Fail2Ban junto con Shorewall y me ha funcionado muy bien, les dejo la instrucción utilizada, en el filtro de fail2ban (kernel.conf). failregex = Shorewall:net2fw.DROP.*SRC=HOST Seguiré investigando, y tratando el problema. -- Saludos, cheperobert ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] HELP
Buenas amigos de Centos soy nuevo en Centos por lo que pido ayuda por favor, tengo instalado Centos 5.6 como proxy y tengo que abrir el puerto 26 para utilizar la plicacion de thunderbird ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] HELP
On 07/09/2012 02:19 PM, atlas edison salinas briceño wrote: Buenas amigos de Centos soy nuevo en Centos por lo que pido ayuda por favor, tengo instalado Centos 5.6 como proxy y tengo que abrir el puerto 26 para utilizar la plicacion de thunderbird hay que mejorar la calidad de los asuntos: HELP no indica nada. el puerto 26? el puerto 26 saliente? 26/tcp? cómo estás haciendo proxy? sólo con squid o algo con itpables? haces ya nat o no? ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] HELP
Iptables mister Forware al puerto 26, para que tus clientes salgan hacia el puerto 26 en el exterior. O si el proxy provee el servicio INPUT O si deseas salir por el puerto 26 OUTPUT eje Iptables -A FORWARE INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT Recuerda deshabilitar selinux o configurarlo tambien Y por ke no instalaste centos 6. Mi proxy funciona de pelos. Recuerda actualizxar tu centos hacia el 5.8 para tener los últimos parches Saludos -Mensaje original- De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En nombre de Ernesto Pérez Estévez Enviado el: lunes, 09 de julio de 2012 18:20 Para: centos-es@centos.org Asunto: Re: [CentOS-es] HELP On 07/09/2012 02:19 PM, atlas edison salinas briceño wrote: Buenas amigos de Centos soy nuevo en Centos por lo que pido ayuda por favor, tengo instalado Centos 5.6 como proxy y tengo que abrir el puerto 26 para utilizar la plicacion de thunderbird hay que mejorar la calidad de los asuntos: HELP no indica nada. el puerto 26? el puerto 26 saliente? 26/tcp? cómo estás haciendo proxy? sólo con squid o algo con itpables? haces ya nat o no? ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 67, Envío 5
Quiero montar un gateway que software que necesito gracias por su ayuda El 09/07/2012 11:00, centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió: Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a centos-es@centos.org Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto help en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: centos-es-requ...@centos.org Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: centos-es-ow...@centos.org Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest Además, por favor, incluya en la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está respondiendo. Asuntos del día: 1. Re: Shorewall me genera muchos log en /var/log/messages (cheperobert) -- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:41:41 -0600 From: cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Shorewall me genera muchos log en /var/log/messages To: centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: CA++KSY0tzV7ZLfrxfVJUH1ywz= ewksjfgv91-d2jbtgvytf...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Gracias por sus respuestas a todos por sus respuestas, al final he utilizado Fail2Ban junto con Shorewall y me ha funcionado muy bien, les dejo la instrucción utilizada, en el filtro de fail2ban (kernel.conf). failregex = Shorewall:net2fw.DROP.*SRC=HOST Seguiré investigando, y tratando el problema. -- Saludos, cheperobert -- ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Fin de Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 67, Envío 5 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] fpaste-server pastebin service
From: Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com From: Kaushal Shriyan kaushalshri...@gmail.com Any step by step guide for setting up fpaste-server on CentOS 5.8? 1. Install epel repository. 2. Read the install document on fedora's fpaste-server homepage... 3. Profit! I get into this issue - http://fpaste.org/wadf/ and i do not see your latest and your settings in the configs Any clue? I think you should ask the fpaste people... JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
Phil Savoie wrote: On 07/08/2012 06:48 PM, Micky wrote: The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync and then reinstallation of boot-loader. It works always if you know how it's done. If you need detailed instructions, I can send you that! Yes, please! Could you either post here to the list, or to me personally? The list, if you please. (A link will do.) Thx T. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] lockfile
Hello, i need for an old bios-update the programm lockfile. The update-bin make a check via which lockfile. I have installed lockfile-progs.x86_64 on a CentOS 5.8 and i have the programm lockfile and lockfile-check, lockfile-create, lockfile-remove, lockfile-touch in /usr/bin/. On my CentOS 6.2 i have install the pakage liblockfile.x86_64, too. I have the lockfile-check, lockfile-create, lockfile-remove, lockfile-touch in /usr/bin/ But i missing the lockfile. Thanks Sebastian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] lockfile
From: sebastian cen...@secretusenet.com i need for an old bios-update the programm lockfile. The update-bin make a check via which lockfile. I have installed lockfile-progs.x86_64 on a CentOS 5.8 and i have the programm lockfile and lockfile-check, lockfile-create, lockfile-remove, lockfile-touch in /usr/bin/. On my CentOS 6.2 i have install the pakage liblockfile.x86_64, too. I have the lockfile-check, lockfile-create, lockfile-remove, lockfile-touch in /usr/bin/ But i missing the lockfile. On CentOS 5: # rpm -qf /usr/bin/lockfile procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos.i386 On CentOS 6: # yum whatprovides /usr/bin/lockfile ... procmail-3.22-25.1.el6.x86_64 : Mail processing program Repo : base Matched from: Filename : /usr/bin/lockfile JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin centos.ad...@gmail.com wrote: On 7/9/12, Micky mickylmar...@gmail.com wrote: The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync and then reinstallation of boot-loader. It works always if you know how it's done. The problem I found with rsync is that it is very slow when there are a lot of small files. Any idea how this can be improved on or is that a fundamental limit? One thing that helps is to break it up into separate runs, at least per-filesystem and perhaps some of the larger subdirectories. Depending on the circumstances, you might be able to do an initial run ahead of time when speed doesn't matter so much, then just before the cutover shut down the services that will be changing files and databases and do a final rsync which will go much faster. Also, have you looked at clonezilla and ReaR? -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 7/9/12, Micky mickylmar...@gmail.com wrote: The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync and then reinstallation of boot-loader. It works always if you know how it's done. The problem I found with rsync is that it is very slow when there are a lot of small files. Any idea how this can be improved on or is that a fundamental limit? I do dump/restores fir this sort of thing. - aurf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
aurfalien wrote: On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 7/9/12, Micky mickylmar...@gmail.com wrote: The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync and then reinstallation of boot-loader. It works always if you know how it's done. The problem I found with rsync is that it is very slow when there are a lot of small files. Any idea how this can be improved on or is that a fundamental limit? I do dump/restores fir this sort of thing. Depends on if you want everything, and of course, if there's a hardware difference, you need to chroot (assuming you rsync'd to special directories, like /new and /boot/new), and do some mounts and chroot, and rebuild the initrd.img mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:00 -0700, aurfalien wrote: On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: On 7/9/12, Micky mickylmar...@gmail.com wrote: The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync and then reinstallation of boot-loader. It works always if you know how it's done. The problem I found with rsync is that it is very slow when there are a lot of small files. Any idea how this can be improved on or is that a fundamental limit? I do dump/restores fir this sort of thing. +1 John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] run fsck manually
Is there a way in centos to just go ahead and do this automatically? /dev/sdal: Unexpected Inconsistency; [FAILED] Run fsck Manually (ie. Without –a or –p options) ***An error occurred during the File system check ***Dropping you to a shell; system will reboot when you leave the shell Give root password for Maintenance (or type Control-D to continue) I have some remote stations - and if something goes wrong as it did, I just want the fsck to be ran automatically and auto reboot Can the behaviour be changed in a config file? Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] tcptrack
On 7/9/2012 1:59 PM, John Hinton wrote: Does anybody have a working version of tcptrack running on Centos 6 x64? The rpmforge rpm installs and runs on the -t eth# command, but if you add a port to it, it bombs with a pcap compile error. It runs fine for me on Centos 5 x64, but seems to have what looks like an old bug reintroduced in 6. Crap... typo... I meant the -i eth# command. :( -- John Hinton 877-777-1407 ext 502 http://www.ew3d.com Comprehensive Online Solutions ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] run fsck manually
Jerry Geis wrote: Is there a way in centos to just go ahead and do this automatically? /dev/sdal: Unexpected Inconsistency; [FAILED] Run fsck Manually (ie. Without –a or –p options) ***An error occurred during the File system check snip a) fsck -y -C [-c] /dev/sda1 (-c will check for bad blocks; it will take a *while*; run it overnight, or over dinner, or over the next looong meeting) b) Buy new disk, *now*, insert, rsync over. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] run fsck manually
On Jul 9, 2012, at 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Jerry Geis wrote: Is there a way in centos to just go ahead and do this automatically? /dev/sdal: Unexpected Inconsistency; [FAILED] Run fsck Manually (ie. Without –a or –p options) ***An error occurred during the File system check snip a) fsck -y -C [-c] /dev/sda1 (-c will check for bad blocks; it will take a *while*; run it overnight, or over dinner, or over the next looong meeting) b) Buy new disk, *now*, insert, rsync over. He's not asking what to type at that point, he's asking how to keep the kernel from stopping at that point and just do the (possibly destructive, but often-times all that gets damaged/moved to lost+found, is open logs that were open when the system went down) fsck. (Unfortunately I do not know the answer as to how to tell the initial fsck just to go ahead and do the destructive fsck pass, without human intervention, as I wouldn't want it to do that, but I see where the communication misunderstanding is happening in the e-mail chain.) He's saying the desktop machines are throwaway and he doesn't want to take the time to go over and look... do the fsck and if it trashes the filesystem, he'll just re-image the machine later. Meanwhile, the user isn't confused by the fsck message or interrupted by it, if the machine finds filesystem problems at boot time. I would assume this is often a desired behavior on machines that have poor AC power at remote sites. Give the fsck a try if I'm not there. Nate ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] run fsck manually
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Nate Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote: He's not asking what to type at that point, he's asking how to keep the kernel from stopping at that point and just do the (possibly destructive, but often-times all that gets damaged/moved to lost+found, is open logs that were open when the system went down) fsck. (Unfortunately I do not know the answer as to how to tell the initial fsck just to go ahead and do the destructive fsck pass, without human intervention, as I wouldn't want it to do that, but I see where the communication misunderstanding is happening in the e-mail chain.) He's saying the desktop machines are throwaway and he doesn't want to take the time to go over and look... do the fsck and if it trashes the filesystem, he'll just re-image the machine later. Meanwhile, the user isn't confused by the fsck message or interrupted by it, if the machine finds filesystem problems at boot time. I would assume this is often a desired behavior on machines that have poor AC power at remote sites. Give the fsck a try if I'm not there. Answered a while back on the list: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2012-January/122777.html -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos