[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
159ca45420765e0df36360d02fe7e38fcf934e4aa24b65191197466aa25d6305  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
66b4211d4731cbf49d96798557018fa23504f17a09a848400222c507b110be4f  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
67d8f9f380da80addb6be75cbbd97da6c6fd723af7785f640f7871d3d2c92cb4  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1177 CentOS 5 kdebase FASTTRACK Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1177 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1177.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
65d20fa7abbe779a15be0dbe363a7bedb53004e8ea2831f065671a35194ca721  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
a29f8b0c014d36410de09b98e576360a75b82b81791181843f3ece7844569564  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
0247fc691af88e9a9d76dcbcdd96681df9321b0e2c20222f2bf16fa4220a61ef  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176 CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
49c2298279ef173ee6dc62fc0f9fd62ac46ed66848f3c4a0d2d2bb36b167c7a2  
qt-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
e340ba08f9edd035ba5495dbc3772d04c74c751ebe0eca2ed508fb012e22206a  
qt-config-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
e12f73877484ecadabb92835f1981ed74f82769c3786652942120cf25fe83875  
qt-designer-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
d20bc6d82d9f361095003c63bed226e956ebad285a8ea81aae7a2f03df1b85ea  
qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
2f62a8ac941b76e58a2391e1cae312d5ea80106c470805e8bffcb3bf01f3e53f  
qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
b124352b66f4295377a50e5d71d15f72f5dbfffd9ec473984f1b950b889d71a7  
qt-MySQL-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
036c5d427073a280058233cf9e7dd3628a85f8724cfec376b2d67b2fd224c9fc  
qt-ODBC-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
96c0802b1c9ae649a86524f9de17bb66b77416d2ed50822a920fe4a5e5f23569  
qt-PostgreSQL-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm

x86_64:
49c2298279ef173ee6dc62fc0f9fd62ac46ed66848f3c4a0d2d2bb36b167c7a2  
qt-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
e65011594db81cf48f81a4c9fa095985fedd16511601985afad13136204c35cd  
qt-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
37793bb00175f854cd890e8a16b39638fb1bffd83fd64eff89402aea8e7fe2e6  
qt-config-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
0fb16765336a1a0537b34e49ff0044346c4ef88d1eb1a8e767ab1fb5564627d7  
qt-designer-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
d20bc6d82d9f361095003c63bed226e956ebad285a8ea81aae7a2f03df1b85ea  
qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
6af5c74db25894400b34abaf9f58fe9dc74c4b25a4cba99216f9bc4feabee597  
qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
988bb8c27e76a5bfd29e5a4eef6b680986473dc989363ef8aabbaadbfe89f05d  
qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
1125fd3d108a5f336f1187d717c0d33b0d89aabba25ccc2957cbc7b10a6784b2  
qt-MySQL-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
c2d6f8d72784ace7ca2d49aea436a8f11ca047568085e8face4fb44683ed  
qt-ODBC-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm
9d4110c3764ef4e9be1c72b01f8c70b2d70d03d5234a4808587cfcdcaa7f0f94  
qt-PostgreSQL-3.3.6-26.el5.x86_64.rpm

Source:
6bf19f1a96296d55785d938b6532f6070add6f759b919917824cae44fdc94b99  
qt-3.3.6-26.el5.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1181 Moderate CentOS 5 gimp Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1181 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1181.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
c44b76b8d8dc3913934f6196450bb9301d9df6b7aec601384a8268c7f92e90d5  
gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm
e6c3cd9a0a73365bd85f6d2c009b14bd9a1ac322a96e383496f05cfb98921f17  
gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm
25071e1980de80b9c1ff245bf771c3d4146528ec36c7ab563e70e3f44fafe344  
gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm

x86_64:
89770f7bd126caf4aec4985547cb826369e59fee508ab4762d9491030a285b37  
gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm
e6c3cd9a0a73365bd85f6d2c009b14bd9a1ac322a96e383496f05cfb98921f17  
gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm
6cc4a74f6c4836cd184f1b7d74badb7be5da4f6bdbb76307d994eec1db307acf  
gimp-devel-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm
25071e1980de80b9c1ff245bf771c3d4146528ec36c7ab563e70e3f44fafe344  
gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.i386.rpm
f140eca53b571b18ab36f4376925894eb11b1ee67754d4c17cfd2d4b19764076  
gimp-libs-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.x86_64.rpm

Source:
5537a6bc1099f8c59a05d79936e885788c3f49b6f6c42e9920149d5cfa75b58e  
gimp-2.2.13-2.0.7.el5_8.5.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:C001 CentOS 6 redhat-logos Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:C001

Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5704

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
74dbed48cbd714b3a7debeaebc4a093bbce9976dc76f144b9249e553b7793427  
redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.noarch.rpm

x86_64:
28de9ed3b8d891044155cdd9c4941a65352b3bd683c8cb008ab598a286b8a805  
redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.noarch.rpm

Source:
b497c0c213c8e030a41ce3effe13d61e98c312756297d8938414d0363f350abc  
redhat-logos-60.0.14-12.el6.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:C002 CentOS 6 dhcp Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:C002

Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5889

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
387a38afe1b53b3f87665b6c7cd2cf0262bdfe18933b65bdc65c342c0d86f08f  
dhclient-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
72b8765c4e6742169f67ee0b3441dbacef2331e4769d07807b1d50196f2b246c  
dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
c860a224d443cbfd832b730914393e54ff9a08755a9eff71bf8249b2f457baf7  
dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
20cdb4d34b32fc9f4bf61b6810ee61af70cefb2d2f79cffdd728a0d847442061  
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm

x86_64:
47417203c5fbfa436dc44b83c194c3119a7e639b435f57887aac0f2a3c2cdf9a  
dhclient-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
bf2ca9a40a93bf118e098557c76d0add80f0582df0fb2a0e372c164ffacca89b  
dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
8d425858432225ba39bf903959da431a1da2607a7a060875debd3319d02a42bf  
dhcp-common-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm
20cdb4d34b32fc9f4bf61b6810ee61af70cefb2d2f79cffdd728a0d847442061  
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.i686.rpm
952e3ac4cae9c98316c92ff925bddadc34cb9c6e820c93e49973bbe1f14704aa  
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.x86_64.rpm

Source:
56b15a8ce8c4efc5e532be1ac83fef183ef5254099d1fca52e1506d39ce26dbb  
dhcp-4.1.1-31.0.1.P1.el6.centos.1.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1175 CentOS 6 lldpad Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1175 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1175.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
44c0d1a80e6afcf5ce1815c5594e22e69b64d71995ecb0580c18f95086b14001  
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm
d89a96d9870538240259713e4604edf2fe01f290d09d313bc97e4e7a83a2b973  
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm

x86_64:
b8d1fe24aedc0bd2257751100e4e31da63a0e83b8b8f6f1bf2750f82d9704701  
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.x86_64.rpm
d89a96d9870538240259713e4604edf2fe01f290d09d313bc97e4e7a83a2b973  
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.i686.rpm
b60d621b8669a0e4ed5811a743f2bf1fc0bc218e2a8e728a472d77782b33ed5b  
lldpad-devel-0.9.43-20.el6_3.x86_64.rpm

Source:
7813cc04c6726c7860fcf31a049bf2c4cabfbcd5e297bd9891a4f7ae4eb9da04  
lldpad-0.9.43-20.el6_3.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2012:1180 Moderate CentOS 6 gimp Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:1180 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1180.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
bf77c78603120e7763f561e53f9d0f05a4a43cf4f9ae5ca310aa47bd1cea3875  
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
afdfc47cea6baf3f805915c88377f01fd158cfc95f3384fb3ff6910b92dbfeb6  
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
bae1bc702fccecd530ca5ce023fd27b8faebfe8502c1db8754098033d214c5de  
gimp-devel-tools-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
50a7d1a29b521fb183db906330a30db193d1b253e61c7eb5651b4c9cd1fdb2d4  
gimp-help-browser-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
7c49f7125b1d6921c72fcbd5e39b82cc738868728ea6ad69bf627d8224cb46a7  
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm

x86_64:
700bff613b9c5ec262ccf2f1fa307e9c0250c73fbc712582962f7939ef811cbe  
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
afdfc47cea6baf3f805915c88377f01fd158cfc95f3384fb3ff6910b92dbfeb6  
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
afbfdc0c694c04ded8e7631aedb90732b82fc572ef08cd91d59e51601e2d31c3  
gimp-devel-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
7e9d7bbedf7af8738f87ef7d8973c855b4a4cfdade3e0319053225ac4000c6d4  
gimp-devel-tools-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
91f6461858e878872dadee1c95e568fcac38e5ab556efe3b1aed91569b383fd6  
gimp-help-browser-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm
7c49f7125b1d6921c72fcbd5e39b82cc738868728ea6ad69bf627d8224cb46a7  
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.i686.rpm
ab390738da10d9ddd6e6688498c595903a4a5cb393e06ec916686627c33d  
gimp-libs-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.x86_64.rpm

Source:
a4642047bd08241fc1fa97418861fe733761ec0babef53aaef3241227590838c  
gimp-2.6.9-4.el6_3.3.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1182 CentOS 6 dropwatch FASTTRACK Update

[Johnny Hughes]

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1182 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1182.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 


i386:
6ac23fb8e771b955101114e18fca69ec8a6d20e92241fddd86f9b6633931ac5d  
dropwatch-1.3-1.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
25c46207c9b627dbd1e3b7e4d2ff7d607007b077161ab400843cb7c40ae95230  
dropwatch-1.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
2bc4942b0f96336c8d3d5f25a7392f6e347ab5e852a14b786640da31f30f562f  
dropwatch-1.3-1.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net

___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce

[CentOS-es] phpldapadmin en centos 6

[Azu Carlitox]

Buenas, les cuento que configure openldap-server en mi centos 6, el tema es
que luego intente instalar phpldapadmin, y al loguearme en la web del
phpldapadmin, en vez de mostrarme la raiz del arbol ldap, me muestra el
siguiente mensaje:


No se ha podido determinar la raíz de su árbol LDAP.
Parece que el servidor LDAP ha sido configurado para no revelar su raíz.
*Por favór, especifíquela en config.php*

alguien tiene idea que tengo que modificar para poder ver la raiz?
Gracias y salu2
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Karanbir Singh]

On 08/19/2012 05:56 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Here is what I found:

now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
require / use - RH specific services.

- KB
-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax  | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] default gateway outside of the LAN

[James Hogarth]

 It's impossible to create a route via a host that can't be resolved by
 ARP (for IPv4).


Very true in general - the assumption in IRC was that text is not
always the best medium for transmitting ideas - especially when
someone is specifically anonymising stuff or does not have english as
a first language...

The only thing we could think of was that sort of scenario that could
possibly be valid... but without the original poster coming back and
describing more who's to say?

You don't need to resolve like that in the event of a true point to
point link where you can direct traffic down it (think serial WAN) and
the network layer type of traffic (IP or otherwise... much less
specific subnets) doesn't actually matter... but that didn't seem to
be what the OP was talking about unless in his attempt to generalise
and disguise his network layout he hid that inadvertently.

For an IP packet to be routed though it does indeed require resolving
a gateway on the local link for that to be routed through...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Sendmail Masquerade

[Ken Smith]

Hi All,

I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have 
missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set 
sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of 
the network it lives on. Its real hostname is server2.domain.co.uk ( the 
domain bit is substituted for this post) and I want it to send as 
domain.co.uk, that is really valid, but the specific host 
server2.domain.co.uk does not have an A record and other mailservers 
reject its outgoing mail because server2.domain.co.uk does not resolve. 
But with these settings in sendmail.mc it still sends as 
server2.domain.co.uk if I simply type mail -s test k...@kensnet.org 
into bash.

MASQUERADE_AS(`domain.co.uk')dnl
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
FEATURE(masquerade_entire_domain)dnl
MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(domain.co.uk)dnl

(Yes I have done the m4 bit and restarted sendmail)

If I telnet to sendmail on port 25 and manually send as 
usern...@domain.co.uk it has the right from address.

So what have I missed?

Thanks

Ken



-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Johnny Hughes]

On 08/19/2012 11:56 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Hello Akemi,

 On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 11:52 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
 Producing an accurate list of missing packages is tricky -- mainly
 because you need access to RHN.
 Even though RHN of course is the ultimate resource you can get pretty
 far by just checking the Technical notes for 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3.

 Perhaps someone with RHN access could double check the availability of
 these packages, although the information extracted from the TNs suggests
 most of the ones I mentioned are indeed available upstream. So far only
 report seems to be discontinued.

 Here is what I found:

 On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
 leon...@den.ottolander.nl wrote:

 Missing packages:
 be2net-4.0.160r-3.el6_1
 TN 6.1 new addition, parts TP
 TN 6.2 parts continued as TP, security fix, bug fix
 TN 6.3 parts continued as TP, bug fix

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault


 bnx2-2.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
 TN 6.1 mentioned in relation with dracut-network

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault

 bnx2fc-1.0.10.32.269-1.el6_2
 TN 6.2 parts continued as TP
 TN 6.3 parts continued as TP

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault

 bnx2i-2.7.2.1.32.269-1.el6_2
 TN 6.1 new addition, parts TP, bug fix
 TN 6.2 parts continued as TP, enhancement
 TN 6.3 parts continued as TP

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault

 bnx2x-1.72.00_0.32.269-1.el6_2
 TN 6.1 bug fix
 TN 6.2 bug fix
 TN 6.3 mentioned in relation with libvirtd

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault

 cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

 clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
 TN 6.2 bug fix update
 TN 6.3 bug fix update

 cnic-2.5.10.32.269-1.el6_2
 TN 6.1 new addition, parts TP

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault


 compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-86.el6
 compat-gcc-296-2.96-144.el6
 compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-69.el6
 No mention in any TN, perhaps a CentOS policy not to build these?

 ding-libs-0.1.2-9.el6
 TN 6.1 new package
 TN 6.3 bug fix update

 hpwdt-1.2.0-2.el6_0
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

kmod for 6.0, no longer applicable for 6.3 kernels.


 hunspell-no-2.0.10-5.1.el6
 Mention of hunspell in TN 6.1 and 6.2 in relation to other packages

 igb-3.0.6_k-2.el6_1
 TN 6.1 bug fix update
 TN 6.2 enhancement update

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault


 iprutils-2.3.9-2.el6
 TN 6.1 enhancement update
 TN 6.2 bug fix + enhancement update
 TN 6.3 bug fix + enhancement update


PPC only, not supported

 ixgbe-3.4.8_k-3.el6_1
 TN 6.1 bug fix + enhancement update
 TN 6.2 bug fix update

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault


 kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

 libehca-1.2.2-3.el6
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

 libica-2.1.0-2.el6
 TN 6.1 bug fix update
 TN 6.2 bug fix + enhancement update


s390 only, not supported

 librtas-1.3.4-2.el6
 TN 6.3 mentions librtas-devel as a build requirement for lsmcode

 libservicelog-1.1.9-6.el6
 TN 6.3 bug fix update

ppc only, not supported


 lsvpd-1.6.10-5.el6
 TN 6.1 mentioned in relation with libvpd
 TN 6.2 man page update
 TN 6.3 bug fix update

ppc only, not supported

 mlx4_core-1.1.32.269-1.el6_2 If from libmlx4 then still behind
 mlx4_en-2.0.32.269-1.el6_2 If from libmlx4 then still behind
 mlx4_ib-1.0.32.269-1.el6_2 If from libmlx4 then still behind
 TN 6.3 mlx4_en driver update (obsolete parameters)
 TN 6.3 mention of mlx4 in relation to a DMA leak, memory allocation
 failure

These are kmods no longer apply to 6.3 kernels ... look in vault.


 mpitests-3.2-5.el6 Actually available as mpitests-subs, but behind
 C6 @ 3.2-4.el6
 This is a missing update.

 openssl-ibmca-1.2.0-2.el6_2.1
 TN 6.2 bug fix + enhancement update

s390 only, not supported

 ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
 TN 6.2 bug fix
 TN 6.3 bug fix

 powerpc-utils-1.2.10-2.el6 Not included because CentOS does not
 support
 power?
 ppc64-diag-2.4.2-10.el6 Not included because CentOS does not support
 power?
 ppc64-utils-0.14-10.el6 Not included because CentOS does not support
 power?

ppc not supported

 report-0.18-9.el6
 TN 6.1 bug fix update
 TN 6.2 discontinued BZ#725660, superceded by abrt and libreport

in vault, not applicable to 6.3 because of obsoletes.

 s390utils-1.8.2-48.el6
 TN 6.1 bug fix update
 TN 6.2 bug fix + enhancement update
 TN 6.3 bug fix + enhancement update

s390, not supported

 servicelog-1.1.7-3.el6
 (IBM p)
 TN 6.3 bug fix update

ppc only, not supported

 snd_core-1.0.21.6.3.0-1.el6_2
 snd_hda-1.0.21.6.3.0-1.el6_2
 snd-hda-1.0-1.el6_0 Package apparently renamed and split, neither
 snd-hda, snd_core nore snd_hda available
 TN 6.3 BZ#805658 The WinFast VP200 H (Teradici) snd-hda-intel 

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:

 On 08/16/2012 04:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
  vi is generally a symlink to vim these days.

 Actually, it's a shell alias.  And then, only if vim is installed, 
 which it isn't in some configurations.  IIRC, desktop systems have him 
 by default, but server installations do not.

It is neither a symlink nor a shell alias - execpt maybe for platforms that
for some reason don't include vi.

vi is OSS and the OSS vi is fully POSIX compliant.

and BTW: vi does not read .vimrc but .exrc

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:



 Am 20.08.2012 13:07, schrieb Joerg Schilling:
  Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
  
  On 08/16/2012 04:55 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
  vi is generally a symlink to vim these days.
 
  Actually, it's a shell alias.  And then, only if vim is installed, 
  which it isn't in some configurations.  IIRC, desktop systems have him 
  by default, but server installations do not.
  
  It is neither a symlink nor a shell alias - execpt maybe for platforms that
  for some reason don't include vi.

 you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?

Of course

 the topic is about vi default in CENTOS 6.x so what

You seem to missunderstand that there is a program called vi and another 
program called vim. 

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Leonard den Ottolander]

On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 So, that still leaves the following that I am looking into:
 
 cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6
 clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6
 compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-86.el6
 compat-gcc-296-2.96-144.el6
 compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-69.el6
 ding-libs-0.1.2-9.el6
 hunspell-no-2.0.10-5.1.el6
 libehca-1.2.2-3.el6
 librtas-1.3.4-2.el6
 mpitests-3.2-5.el6
 ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
 virt-who-0.6-6.el6
 xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.12-1.el6
 xorg-x11-drv-neomagic-1.2.5-1.el6

Thank you Johnny.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hello Johnny,

On Sat, 2012-08-18 at 19:25 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Still leaves:
 CentOS: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6
 RHEL63: dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1 Unless dmidecode-2.11-2.el6.src.rpm ==
 dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1.src.rpm this is an update.
 CentOS: gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6
 RHEL63: gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6_2 Unless
 gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6.src.rpm ==
 gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6_2.src.rpm this is an update.
 CentOS: python-rhsm-0.96.15-1.el6
 RHEL63: python-rhsm-0.99.12-1.el6
 CentOS: vios-proxy-0.1-1.el6
 RHEL63: vios-proxy-0.2-1.el6

Don't forget these. First two might be false positives, the two below
probably aren't.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hello Karanbir,

On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 10:10 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 now remove architecture specific packages, and packages that map to /
 require / use - RH specific services.

Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
documented so I can use that for future reference and save myself some
time going through all the tech notes?

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Karanbir Singh]

On 08/20/2012 12:41 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Perhaps you can point me to a location where the excluded package are
 documented so I can use that for future reference and save myself some
 time going through all the tech notes?

you need to cycle through the srpms look at exclusivearch and work back
from there - and also check the notes to see whats released where.

there are rpms released to only one arch as well, even when they build
to multiple ones :/

- KB

-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax  | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS 6 vs. other RHEL clones: security advisory comparison

[Janne Snabb]

Hello,

I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
Scientific Linux 6.

The article is available at the following URL:

http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187

I hope you find it interesting. Looks like CentOS has been doing quite
well this year in this regard.

Feedback is welcome, but please post it at the bottom of the article or
to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
message is specifically about CentOS. Please do not start a flame war on
this mailing list.

In case the graphs are not visible in your browser, you should start
using a browser which supports current technologies (specifically: SVG
graphics).

Best Regards,
-- 
Janne Snabb / EPIPE Communications
sn...@epipe.com - http://epipe.com/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hello Johnny,

A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
relates to one package or those above as well...

On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
  kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
  No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

I think you overlooked this one. I'm quite sure the comment below does
not apply to kdebindings ;) .

  libehca-1.2.2-3.el6

And this, or is this S390 too?

  libica-2.1.0-2.el6
 s390 only, not supported

  librtas-1.3.4-2.el6

PPC only too?

  libservicelog-1.1.9-6.el6
 ppc only, not supported

  lsvpd-1.6.10-5.el6
 ppc only, not supported

What about libvpd? You build and distribute that.

  zaf-0-0.3.20080714svn.1.el6
  No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.

And what about this one?

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Johnny Hughes]

On 08/20/2012 07:25 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 Hello Johnny,

 A few more questions because it's not always sure if your reply only
 relates to one package or those above as well...

 On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 05:53 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.
 I think you overlooked this one. I'm quite sure the comment below does
 not apply to kdebindings ;) .


Added to my list.


 libehca-1.2.2-3.el6
 And this, or is this S390 too?

Still researching.


 libica-2.1.0-2.el6
 s390 only, not supported
 librtas-1.3.4-2.el6
 PPC only too?

Still Researching


 libservicelog-1.1.9-6.el6
 ppc only, not supported
 lsvpd-1.6.10-5.el6
 ppc only, not supported
 What about libvpd? You build and distribute that.

If it is built, then it does not have an EXCLUSIVEARCH set in the SRPM
... however, here is lsvpd, which does:

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0795.html

libvpd should also be ppc only ... but they left out the EXCLUSIVE ARCH
in their SRPMS:

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2011-0548.html

So, libvpd should be (and will be) removed.
 (see what we have to go through for the 6.x releases)

 zaf-0-0.3.20080714svn.1.el6
 No mention in any TN, no mention that it has been removed either though.
 And what about this one?

Added to my list.

 Regards,
 Leonard.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[William Hooper]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:

 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
  you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?

 Of course

  the topic is about vi default in CENTOS 6.x so what

 You seem to missunderstand that there is a program called vi and another
 program called vim.

Not on a standard CentOS system.

[whooper@chef ~]$ /bin/vi --version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr  5 2012 10:17:55)

On a machine that has the vim-enhanced package installed (care of the
files dropped in /etc/profile.d/vim.*:

$ which vi
alias vi='vim'
/usr/bin/vim

--
William Hooper
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Johnny Hughes]

snip

Here is my research .. I think no action is required, based on the
individual comments:

===
cdrkit-1.1.9-11.el6

This is built ... not missing (built packages are not named cdrkit, but
instead dirsplit, genisoimage, icedax, wodim)

No Action Required.
===
clustermon-0.16.2-18.el6

This is built ... not missing (built packages are not named clustermod,
but are named modcluster*)

No Action Required.
===
compat-gcc-295-2.95.3-86.el6

Not Required s390 only

No Action Required.
===
compat-gcc-296-2.96-144.el6

This can build on CentOS-6, but is not in the upstream i686 or x86_64 repos

No Action Requried.
===
compat-gcc-32-3.2.3-69.el6

This can build on CentOS-6, but is not in the upstream i686 or x86_64 repos

No Action Requried.
===
ding-libs-0.1.2-9.el6

This is built, not missing (built packages not named ding-libs, but
libpath_utils and libpath_utils-devel)

No Action Required.
===
hunspell-no-2.0.10-5.1.el6

This is built, not missing (built packages not named hunspell-no, but
are hunspell-nb, hunspell-nn, hyphen-nb, hyphen-nn, mythes-nb, mythes-nn)

No Action Required.
===
kdebindings-4.3.4-5.el6

This is built, not missing (built packages not named kdebindings, but
are named PyKDE4, PyKDE4-akonadi, PyKDE4-devel, kross-python)

No Action Required.
===
libehca-1.2.2-3.el6

ExclusiveArch: ppc ppc64

No Action Required.
===
librtas-1.3.4-2.el6

ExclusiveArch: ppc ppc64

No Action Required.
===
mpitests-3.2-5.el6

This is built, not missing (built packages not named mpitests, instead
named openmpi, mvapich, mvapich2, mvapich-psm, mvapich2-psm)

No Action Required.
===
ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6

ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6. 

No Action required.
===
python-rhsm

Desc:  A Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified
Entitlement Platform

This is not included in CentOS because it is used to comunicate with RHN
... we do not communicate with RHN.

No action required.
===
virt-who-0.6-6.el6
Desc:  Agent that collects information about virtual guests present in
the system and
report them to the subscription manager

This is not included in CentOS because it is used to comunicate with RHN
... we do not communicate with RHN.

No action required.
===
xorg-x11-drv-geode-2.11.12-1.el6

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
This is released on i686, is not required for x86_64.

No action required.
===
xorg-x11-drv-neomagic-1.2.5-1.el6

ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}
This is released on i686, is not requried for x86_64

No action required.
===
vios-proxy-0.2-1.el6

Based on the SRPM, there is no vios-proxy-0.2 rpm, just
vios-proxy-host-0.2-1*, vios-proxy-guest-0.2-1*, and
vios-proxy-guest-0.2-1*

Therefore the CentOS tree has vios-proxy-0.1-1.rpm (build from the older
SRPM), and the vios-proxy-0.2-1 RPMS (built from the new RPM).  This is
the approach by Scientific Linux and Oracle Linux.

No Action Required.
===
zaf-0-0.3.20080714svn.1.el6

This is built ... not missing (built packages are not named zaf, but are
named hyphen-af and hyphen-zu)

No Action Required.
===



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

William Hooper whooper...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
 joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
 
  Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
   you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?
 
  Of course
 
   the topic is about vi default in CENTOS 6.x so what
 
  You seem to missunderstand that there is a program called vi and another
  program called vim.

 Not on a standard CentOS system.

 [whooper@chef ~]$ /bin/vi --version
 VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr  5 2012 10:17:55)

This just verifies that you don't have a vi.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:

  This just verifies that you don't have a vi

 boah how often should we explain it until you
 understand taht on CENTOS there is NO vi package

 there is only VIM

Nice to see, that you finally realized it too.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Wiki dead links CentOS-Fasttrack

[Karanbir Singh]

On 08/18/2012 11:21 AM, Vnpenguin wrote:
 Reported by me 4 days ago, but no reply yet. It seams that nobody pays
 attention to that!
 

I'm going to push a new centos-release package either later today or
tomorrow. The fast-track repo definitions ( with enabled=0 ) will be
included there.


-- 
Karanbir Singh
+44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh
ICQ: 2522219| Yahoo IM: z00dax  | Gtalk: z00dax
GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[m . roth]

Joerg Schilling wrote:
 William Hooper whooper...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Joerg Schilling
 joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
  Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
   you are aware that you are posting to the CENTOS-list?
 
  Of course
 
   the topic is about vi default in CENTOS 6.x so what
 
  You seem to missunderstand that there is a program called vi and
  another program called vim.

 Not on a standard CentOS system.

 [whooper@chef ~]$ /bin/vi --version
 VIM - Vi IMproved 7.2 (2008 Aug 9, compiled Apr  5 2012 10:17:55)

 This just verifies that you don't have a vi.

This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi - one
from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
early/mid-nineties? or one from Tru-64 in the late nineties? or were you
insisting on one that ran on a system from the early-to-mid-eighties?

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail Masquerade

[Les Mikesell]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smith k...@kensnet.org wrote:
 Hi All,

 I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have
 missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set
 sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of
 the network it lives on. Its real hostname is server2.domain.co.uk ( the
 domain bit is substituted for this post) and I want it to send as
 domain.co.uk, that is really valid, but the specific host
 server2.domain.co.uk does not have an A record and other mailservers
 reject its outgoing mail because server2.domain.co.uk does not resolve.
 But with these settings in sendmail.mc it still sends as
 server2.domain.co.uk if I simply type mail -s test k...@kensnet.org
 into bash.

 MASQUERADE_AS(`domain.co.uk')dnl
 FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
 FEATURE(masquerade_entire_domain)dnl
 MASQUERADE_DOMAIN(domain.co.uk)dnl

 (Yes I have done the m4 bit and restarted sendmail)

 If I telnet to sendmail on port 25 and manually send as
 usern...@domain.co.uk it has the right from address.

 So what have I missed?

Are you doing the test that fails as the 'EXPOSED_USER' in sendmail.mc
(i.e. root)?  That is for intentional exceptions to MASQUERADE_AS so
you can tell where system type messages from cron jobs, etc. originate
if you send everything to a mail hub.

-- 
  Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
 not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi - one
 from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
 early/mid-nineties? or one from Tru-64 in the late nineties? or were you
 insisting on one that ran on a system from the early-to-mid-eighties?

SunOS 3 Vi source not available to the public.
IrixVi source not available to the public.
Tru-64  Vi source not available to the public.


You currently may have the vi source from aprox. 1979 under a 4 clause BSD 
license 
or the current Solaris vi under the CDDL. The latter was POSIX compliant 
approved.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[m . roth]

Joerg Schilling wrote:
 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 This just verifies that you're playing word games. If you want vi that's
 not vim, may I ask which *version* of vi you would consider to be vi -
 one
 from, say, Sun OS 3? Or from the Irix that ran on our Indigo in the
 early/mid-nineties? or one from Tru-64 in the late nineties? or were you
 insisting on one that ran on a system from the early-to-mid-eighties?

 SunOS 3   Vi source not available to the public.
 Irix  Vi source not available to the public.
 Tru-64Vi source not available to the public.
 

 You currently may have the vi source from aprox. 1979 under a 4 clause BSD
 license or the current Solaris vi under the CDDL. The latter was POSIX
 compliant approved.

And so you assert that if you don't have a version of vi that is strictly
compatible with the 1979 source, and has no improvements or bugfixes, it's
not vi?

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Joerg Schilling]

m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

  You currently may have the vi source from aprox. 1979 under a 4 clause BSD
  license or the current Solaris vi under the CDDL. The latter was POSIX
  compliant approved.

 And so you assert that if you don't have a version of vi that is strictly
 compatible with the 1979 source, and has no improvements or bugfixes, it's
 not vi?

Nobody forces you to use the 1979 version that is not 8 bit clean anyway.

Recent vi versions of course have improvements and bug-fixes. 

BTW: I don't use vi as I am using my ved that is faster than vi.

People who use the vi however complained that vim is not fully vi compatible 
and 
that they prefer to have a real vi under the name vi. People who prefer vim 
could still call vim.

Jörg

-- 
 EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
   j...@cs.tu-berlin.de(uni)  
   joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: 
http://schily.blogspot.com/
 URL:  http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 90, Issue 11

[centos-announce-request]

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2012:1176  CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CEBA-2012:1177 CentOS 5 kdebase FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2012:1176  CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CESA-2012:1181 Moderate CentOS 5 gimp Update (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CEBA-2012:C001 CentOS 6 redhat-logos Update (Johnny Hughes)
   6. CEBA-2012:C002 CentOS 6 dhcp Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:15:56 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176  CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820111556.ga19...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
a6cd4b15ef3e4a0fd758ecbe42a1580d1ea42a55a7f58a167fbc4ef38ede18ad  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
159ca45420765e0df36360d02fe7e38fcf934e4aa24b65191197466aa25d6305  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
9d2cde8cca941a0274147b09697db0dac07b5712983a50b627bdd9a24cfc530b  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
66b4211d4731cbf49d96798557018fa23504f17a09a848400222c507b110be4f  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
67d8f9f380da80addb6be75cbbd97da6c6fd723af7785f640f7871d3d2c92cb4  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 11:21:36 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1177 CentOS 5 kdebase FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820112136.ga19...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1177 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1177.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm

x86_64:
11525bb1b720c1d37bfe38f04f4f30262331e3a65c81a0a987bbf99f3cda87cb  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
65d20fa7abbe779a15be0dbe363a7bedb53004e8ea2831f065671a35194ca721  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
b0a73645a6f1097dbee51ba4595828dbd103575aca3834933296675210f62569  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.i386.rpm
a29f8b0c014d36410de09b98e576360a75b82b81791181843f3ece7844569564  
kdebase-devel-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm

Source:
0247fc691af88e9a9d76dcbcdd96681df9321b0e2c20222f2bf16fa4220a61ef  
kdebase-3.5.4-26.el5.centos.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 15:02:54 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2012:1176  CentOS 5 qt FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20120820150254.ga32...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:1176 

Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-1176.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
49c2298279ef173ee6dc62fc0f9fd62ac46ed66848f3c4a0d2d2bb36b167c7a2  
qt-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
e340ba08f9edd035ba5495dbc3772d04c74c751ebe0eca2ed508fb012e22206a  
qt-config-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
e12f73877484ecadabb92835f1981ed74f82769c3786652942120cf25fe83875  
qt-designer-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
d20bc6d82d9f361095003c63bed226e956ebad285a8ea81aae7a2f03df1b85ea  
qt-devel-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
2f62a8ac941b76e58a2391e1cae312d5ea80106c470805e8bffcb3bf01f3e53f  
qt-devel-docs-3.3.6-26.el5.i386.rpm
b124352b66f4295377a50e5d71d15f72f5dbfffd9ec473984f1b950b889d71a7  

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Les Mikesell]

On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:

 People who use the vi however complained that vim is not fully vi compatible 
 and
 that they prefer to have a real vi under the name vi. People who prefer vim
 could still call vim.

My complaint that started this thread turns out to be not so much
about vim not being vi compatible when executed with the vi name as
that non-root users get a default alias of vi='vim', with surprising
results.   Even though they are both part of the vim package, they act
differently.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hello Johnny,

On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
 
 ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
 Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6. 

Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
That is weird, both TN 6.2 and TN 6.3 mention there are bug fixes for
this package.

https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.2_Technical_Notes/virtualization_issues.html
https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.3_Technical_Notes/virtualization_issues.html

 python-rhsm
 
 Desc:  A Python library to communicate with a Red Hat Unified
 Entitlement Platform
 
 This is not included in CentOS because it is used to comunicate with RHN
 ... we do not communicate with RHN.

You might want to remove the existing rpm from the repos then. Still
exists on C5.8 too.

Thank you for checking my list. Glad to see all packages are accounted
for. I will make sure to compile a list with exceptions and add some
sort of srpm to rpm name translation for source packages that do not
produce a package with the same name.

dmidecode-2.11-2.el6.src.rpm and dmidecode-2.11-2.el6_1.src.rpm only
differ in the changelog so no action required.

gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6.src.rpm and
gnome-power-manager-2.28.3-6.el6_2.src.rpm contents are exactly the same
(apart from mtime), so no action required.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Joseph Koenig]

Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so 
I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages 
(mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the 
top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. As 
it starts to boot, says:

Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1
Call Trace:
[814fd24a] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
[81070bd2] ? do_exit+0x862/0x870
[8117cba5] ? fput+0x25/0x30
[81070c38] ? do_group_exit+0x58/0xd0
[81070cc7] ? sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
[8100b0f2] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Also, tried selecting the previous kernel at boot, but got the same 
message, except with 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 referenced.

Machine is a dell poweredge 620, perc h310 raid controller, 4x600GB 10K 
SAS, 16GB RAM, 2xIntel Xeon E5-2630 2.3GHz procs (hex-core), dual 495W 
power supplies.

Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

-- 
Joe Koenig
Creative Anvil
1346 Baur Blvd
Olivette, MO 63132
314-692-0338
j...@creativeanvil.com
http://www.creativeanvil.com/


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 vs. other RHEL clones: security advisory comparison

[Johnny Hughes]

On 08/20/2012 07:02 AM, Janne Snabb wrote:
 Hello,

 I made some statistics and comparisons about security advisories
 published by three popular RHEL 6 clones: CentOS 6, Oracle Linux 6 and
 Scientific Linux 6.

 The article is available at the following URL:

 http://bitrate.epipe.com/rhel-vs-centos-scientific-oracle-linux-6_187

 I hope you find it interesting. Looks like CentOS has been doing quite
 well this year in this regard.

 Feedback is welcome, but please post it at the bottom of the article or
 to myself in private. Do *not* send it to this mailing list unless your
 message is specifically about CentOS. Please do not start a flame war on
 this mailing list.

 In case the graphs are not visible in your browser, you should start
 using a browser which supports current technologies (specifically: SVG
 graphics).

Would you keep doing this every quarter :-D

I was working on one of these ... I would like to have one to publish
every quarter.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Morten Stevens]

On 20.08.2012 18:17, Joseph Koenig wrote:
 Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, 
 so
 I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
 (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off 
 the
 top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. 
 As
 it starts to boot, says:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
 Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1
 Call Trace:
 [814fd24a] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
 [81070bd2] ? do_exit+0x862/0x870
 [8117cba5] ? fput+0x25/0x30
 [81070c38] ? do_group_exit+0x58/0xd0
 [81070cc7] ? sys_exit_group+0x17/0x20
 [8100b0f2] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

That's probably a bug.

Please fill a bug report at https://bugzilla.redhat.com

 Also, tried selecting the previous kernel at boot, but got the same
 message, except with 2.6.32-279.el6.x86_64 referenced.

Which previous kernel? 2.6.32-279.2.1 or 2.6.32-279.1.1?

 Machine is a dell poweredge 620, perc h310 raid controller, 4x600GB 
 10K
 SAS, 16GB RAM, 2xIntel Xeon E5-2630 2.3GHz procs (hex-core), dual 
 495W
 power supplies.

This machine is certified for RHEL 6 and should run without problems on 
CentOS 6.

Best regards,

Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[m . roth]

Joseph Koenig wrote:
 Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
 I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
 (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
 top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. As
 it starts to boot, says:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
 Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1
 Call Trace:
 [814fd24a] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
snip
My first reaction is when the menu, or the about to boot kernel... line
comes up, edit that, then add rdshell to the end of your kernel line, and
let it boot. If it gets to the rdshell, you might check to see if there's
an agreement between the root (hdx,x) line in grub.conf and what the
system leads grub to think is the first h/d.

Also, here's what I'm assuming: a) the PERC controller is actually
presenting the drives to the system, and b) that grub was in fact
installed.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] vi defaults in 6.x

[Gordon Messmer]

On 08/20/2012 04:07 AM, Joerg Schilling wrote:
 Gordon Messmeryiny...@eburg.com  wrote:

 Actually, it's a shell alias.  And then, only if vim is installed,
 which it isn't in some configurations.  IIRC, desktop systems have him
 by default, but server installations do not.
 It is neither a symlink nor a shell alias - execpt maybe for platforms that
 for some reason don't include vi.

On a CentOS system, vi will be a shell alias when the vim package is 
installed.  Otherwise it will be a variant of vim which is more 
compatible with the POSIX description of vi (though not 100%).  As we 
are discussing CentOS, I believe my statements did not require 
correction.  Thanks.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Joseph Koenig]

 Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
 I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
 (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
 top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up. As
 it starts to boot, says:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
 Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1
 Call Trace:
 [814fd24a] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
 snip
 My first reaction is when the menu, or the about to boot kernel... line
 comes up, edit that, then add rdshell to the end of your kernel line, and
 let it boot. If it gets to the rdshell, you might check to see if there's
 an agreement between the root (hdx,x) line in grub.conf and what the
 system leads grub to think is the first h/d.
Thanks for the suggestion - just tried and doesn't get to rdshell. The 
panic happens within a few seconds (if not less) from when I edit the 
kernel line and hit enter to start booting.
 Also, here's what I'm assuming: a) the PERC controller is actually
 presenting the drives to the system, and b) that grub was in fact
 installed.
Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is presenting 
drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after 
installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.

Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make sure 
that still works? Would that rule out something having gone awry with my 
RAID card or disk?

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[m . roth]

Joseph Koenig wrote:
 Just installed CentOS 6.3 from a minimal install disc. All was well, so
 I ran a yum update, as well as installed some additional packages
 (mysql, httpd, libjpeg, libpng, and more that I don't remember off the
 top of my head). Went to reboot the machine and now it won't book up.
 As it starts to boot, says:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
 Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-279.5.1.el6.x86_64 #1
 Call Trace:
 [814fd24a] ? panic+0xa0/0x168
 snip
 My first reaction is when the menu, or the about to boot kernel...
 line comes up, edit that, then add rdshell to the end of your kernel line,
 and let it boot. If it gets to the rdshell, you might check to see if
 there's an agreement between the root (hdx,x) line in grub.conf and
what the
 system leads grub to think is the first h/d.

 Thanks for the suggestion - just tried and doesn't get to rdshell. The
 panic happens within a few seconds (if not less) from when I edit the
 kernel line and hit enter to start booting.

 Also, here's what I'm assuming: a) the PERC controller is actually
 presenting the drives to the system, and b) that grub was in fact
 installed.

 Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is presenting
 drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
 installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.

 Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make sure
 that still works? Would that rule out something having gone awry with my
 RAID card or disk?

You *might* want to try installing the minimal server version. Minimal
means a lot less

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Joseph Koenig]

 Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is presenting
 drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
 installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.

 Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make sure
 that still works? Would that rule out something having gone awry with my
 RAID card or disk?
 You *might* want to try installing the minimal server version. Minimal
 means a lot less
Installed from minimal the first time around, which is why I thought 
doing that again may be helpful. You think I'd be best to get the full 
install and run that though?

Thanks for all the help.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[m . roth]

Joseph Koenig wrote:
 Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is
 presenting
 drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
 installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.

 Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make
 sure
 that still works? Would that rule out something having gone awry with
 my
 RAID card or disk?
 You *might* want to try installing the minimal server version. Minimal
 means a lot less
 Installed from minimal the first time around, which is why I thought
 doing that again may be helpful. You think I'd be best to get the full
 install and run that though?

Well, I think there's a minimal server, rather than the full server
install. Of course, I could be confusing that with our pxeboot setup


Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC firmware,
or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] SRPM build exceptions list 6.3

[Leonard den Ottolander]

Hi,

Here is a list of packages for 6.3 for which upstream SRPMS are
available but which aren't built on CentOS.

i686 only (these *are* being built, but won't show up in a x86_64 ls):
xorg-x11-drv-geode
xorg-x11-drv-neomagic

PPC:
iprutils
libehca
libica
librtas
libvpd (still available as rpm)
lsvpd
powerpc-utils
ppc64-diag
ppc64-utils
servicelog
yaboot

S390:
compat-gcc-295
openssl-ibmca
s390utils

RHN specific:
python-rhsm (still available as rpm)
rhn-client-tools
rhnlib
rhnsd
subscription-manager
subscription-manager-migration-data
virt-who
yum-rhn-plugin

SRPM available but not built by RH:
compat-gcc-296
compat-gcc-32
ovirt-node

kmods that are merged with the kernel:
be2net
bnx2
bnx2fc
bnx2i
bnx2x
cnic
hpwdt
igb
ixgbe
mlx4_core
mlx4_en
mlx4_ib
snd_core
snd_hda
snd-hda
tg3

obsoleted:
report

CentOS renamed:
redhat-indexhtml - centos-indexhtml
redhat-release-* - centos-release

I'm compiling a list of packages for which the SRPM does not build a
package with the same name. If you're interested in that list let me
know.

Regards,
Leonard.

-- 
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SRPM build exceptions list 6.3

[m . roth]

Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
snip
 CentOS renamed:

 redhat-release-* - centos-release

Will lsb_release -a give the correct result?

  mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Joseph Koenig]

 Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC firmware,
 or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?
Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even 
backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what happens...

Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] SRPM build exceptions list 6.3

[Jake Shipton]

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:27:50 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
 snip
  CentOS renamed:
 
  redhat-release-* - centos-release
 
 Will lsb_release -a give the correct result?
 
   mark
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I believe so... 

[Jake@main-linux-box ~]$ lsb_release -a
LSB
Version:
:core-4.0-amd64:core-4.0-noarch:graphics-4.0-amd64:graphics-4.0-noarch:printing-4.0-amd64:printing-4.0-noarch
Distributor ID: CentOS 
Description:CentOS release 6.3 (Final) 
Release:6.3
Codename:   Final
[Jake@main-linux-box ~]$ ls -l /etc/*-release
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 27 Jun 26 10:30 /etc/centos-release
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Jul 10 20:22 /etc/redhat-release -
centos-release lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 14 Jul 10
20:22 /etc/system-release - centos-release 
[Jake@main-linux-box ~]$ 

:-).

-- 
Jake Shipton (JakeMS)
GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F
GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[m . roth]

Joseph Koenig wrote:

 Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC
 firmware, or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?

 Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even
 backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what happens...

You mean the backup superblocks are bad? And it was a running system before?

Is it still under warranty? You might consider talking to Dell about
checking it out. They'll want you to run the OMSA utility that scans the
system.

   mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Joseph Koenig]

 Well, sure enough, it can't seem to find any good superblocks. Even
 backups are showing corrupt. Will reinstall and see what happens...
 You mean the backup superblocks are bad? And it was a running system before?

 Is it still under warranty? You might consider talking to Dell about
 checking it out. They'll want you to run the OMSA utility that scans the
 system.

Yep, was running just fine, install went fine, then at reboot after the 
yum update, this happened. Server is maybe a week old, so yeah, will get 
a hold of Dell. Thanks,

Joe
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 6.3 missing updates and packages

[Thomas Göttgens]

 On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 09:54 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
 ovirt-node-1.9.3-28.1.el6
 
 ovirt-node is not in the upstream release for 6.3, nor is it in
 Scientific Linux or Oracle Linux for EL6. 

 Do you mean there are no binaries in the upstream 6.3 tree for this?
 That is weird, both TN 6.2 and TN 6.3 mention there are bug fixes for
 this package.

 https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.2_Technical_Notes/virtualization_issues.html
 https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.3_Technical_Notes/virtualization_issues.html

This may be needed to build RHEV-Node-iso's, which are basically a
stripped-down version of a RHEL 6.x distro with a text mode UI, and
therefore not part of the upstream release. This is only speculation
though.

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Thomas Göttgens
mailto:tgoettg...@gmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Sendmail Masquerade

[Ken Smith]

Les Mikesell wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smithk...@kensnet.org  wrote:

 {snip}

 So what have I missed?
  
 Are you doing the test that fails as the 'EXPOSED_USER' in sendmail.mc
 (i.e. root)?  That is for intentional exceptions to MASQUERADE_AS so
 you can tell where system type messages from cron jobs, etc. originate
 if you send everything to a mail hub.



Ah cracked it in one. That's the problem. Thanks Ken

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel Panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill Init!

[Jim Wildman]

I have the same behavior 6.2 vs latest on my Toshiba satellite.

32-220 boots fine (except for the touchpad and power detection)
32-279.2.1 crashes immediately

Glad to forward logs

On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

 Joseph Koenig wrote:
 Yes, grub was installed, and it would seem PERC controller is
 presenting
 drives to the system - at least it was. Before I ran a yum update after
 installing the system, I could boot it and log in just fine.

 Worth reinstalling from the minimal install disc again just to make
 sure
 that still works? Would that rule out something having gone awry with
 my
 RAID card or disk?
 You *might* want to try installing the minimal server version. Minimal
 means a lot less
 Installed from minimal the first time around, which is why I thought
 doing that again may be helpful. You think I'd be best to get the full
 install and run that though?

 Well, I think there's a minimal server, rather than the full server
 install. Of course, I could be confusing that with our pxeboot setup


 Odd thought: have you tried a) looking at the drives in the PERC firmware,
 or b) booting to linux rescue, and examining the filesystems?

   mark

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


--
Jim Wildman, CISSP, RHCE   j...@rossberry.com http://www.rossberry.net
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best
state, is a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one.
Thomas Paine
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos