Re: [CentOS] netinstall

2012-08-25 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>How can I insert a disc which is already inserted?  What am I missing?

Well, pretty simple... You don't have the correct disc "already" inserted.

Its a netinstall, hence the "net" so it needs the net. Its also only a couple
hundred megs, so that should indicate it doesn't have the full tree available.

Grab the dvd if you want to install from the "same" disc, or choose another
method.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] netinstall

2012-08-25 Thread Reinhard Kotucha
Hi,
I just tried to install CentOS 6.3 netinstall and got the error
message  

  -- Disc Not Found --
  The CentOS disc was not found in any of your CDROM drives.  Please
  insert the CentOS disc and press OK to retry.

How can I insert a disc which is already inserted?  What am I missing?

Regards,
  Reinhard

-- 

Reinhard Kotucha  Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover  mailto:reinhard.kotu...@web.de

Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] qc-usb-0.6.6.tar.gz

2012-08-25 Thread Twanny Azzopardi
Can someone make an rpm package for qc-usb-0.6.6.tar.gz on 2.6.18-308.el5.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] OT: what are all these probes from my firewall log????

2012-08-25 Thread Lamar Owen
On Saturday, August 18, 2012 11:01:26 AM fred smith wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:20:56AM -0500, Robert Nichols wrote:
> > On 08/16/2012 11:06 PM, fred smith wrote:
> > > hmm... just did traceroute 10.21.72.1 and it comes back as being a
> > > system at my ISP. that doesn't seem right to me. they shouldn't be
> > > broadcaasting such stuff, as far as I know, at least.

> > Those are BOOTP responses from your ISP's DHCP server to clients requesting
> > an IP address.  They have to be broadcast because the client does not yet
> > have an IP address. 

> that implies that there are a WHOLE LOT of systems served by this provider
> that are doing dhcp requests, given the volume of these things I'm seeing.
> they're arriving at rates ranging from 4-5 a second, to 1-2 a minute,
> mostly in the one every 1-5 seconds rate.

Welcome to NAT444.  Aka 'double-NAT' or 'carrier-grade NAT' where your 
connection's WAN port is further NATted at the ISP's border router, and the ISP 
itself is using RFC 1918 space and minimal publicly routable IP addresses.

There was a special IPv4 address block allocated for this purpose relatively 
recently; discussion can be found in the NANOG mailing list archives.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos machine sometimes unreachable

2012-08-25 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 09:20:20 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Good thought! Could someone have moved non-computer hardware, like, say, a
> desk or chair, or there's been some utility work, and the cable run's
> impacted occasionally... or stepped on?

Or even vibrated loose.

As a lesson in 'vibrational torque' aka the 'whimmy diddle effect' (see 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gee-haw_whammy_diddle ), I'll relate what 
happened to a machine in our newly rennovated Research Building Data Center.  
The machine in question is an EMC Clariion CX3-80 with three 40U racks.  Each 
rack needs two 30A 208V single-phase circuits.  Due to the way the electrical 
was run for this machine, one UPS is powering one side of the three cabinets, 
and a second, smaller UPS is powering the other side.  The secondary feed's 
L6-30R's are mounted to the pedestals of the raised floor; the primary feed's 
L6-30R's are in cast aluminum pendants lying on the subfloor, with the 
receptacles pointing up.

An electrician was drilling two 1/4 inch holes for concrete anchors for a 
conduit run sixteen feet away from the CX3-80 a couple of days ago, and I 
started getting a bunch of alerts from the CX3-80.  I looked at the array, and 
yellow lights were lit on all three cabinets.  Hmm, what's up with that; power 
loss to the whole side of the array?

I lifted the panel over the L6-30R's in the pendant on the subfloor, and all of 
the twist-lock plugs were unplugged from their pendant receptacles!  No one was 
in the data center but the electrician, and the power was fine right before he 
started drilling the two small holes.  I personally had plugged in the plugs 
that morning, and had set the cords to apply the correct torque to maintain the 
twistlock, and had fully seated and locked the plugs in the receptacles.  The 
vibration of the hammer drill sixteen feet away hit the right resonance, and 
'whimmy diddled' the plugs out of their receptacles.

Thermal cycling can also exert torques, and one of my preventive maintenance 
steps in all of our data center spaces with twist lock plugs is to reseat the 
twistlock once per quarter.

  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] write-intent bitmap

2012-08-25 Thread Markus Falb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,
On CentOS 6 I noticed very high load after installing and while the md
raid 1 array was syncing. I found lots of complaints about performance
degradation for md raid with enabled write-intent bitmap. See
http://blog.liw.fi/posts/write-intent-bitmaps/ for example. So I
wanted to it off. I let it sync and then removed the bitmap.

Do you know of a way to not enable a write-intent bitmap while
installing? I had a look at the Kickstart section in Upstreams
Installation guide but found nothing.

My only idea was a %post section
stop the sync (hmm, but how, I think I have to consult mdadm(8)
remove the bitmap
start the sync again

Maybe there is better way? Some kind of trick?

I realize that I can set a bigger chunk size (but how big?) for the
bitmap. But again, how do I do it while installing/kickstarting.

- -- 
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA4mosACgkQYoWFBIJE9eV5awCfSahv1b7DJ7YdHiJVI6ewjx8x
De0An215k6nzYH+lk+1hsGMSzM59TnMV
=580F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos