Re: [CentOS-docs] Request to grant me Wiki edit rights
Hey, On 05/17/2013 04:47 AM, Guest, Simon wrote: I would like to contribute to the CentOS Wiki page http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories Why dont you go ahead and send in the snippet you want added in and someone from the EditGroup will help you get that setup. thanks -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-es] Resumen de CentOS-es, Vol 77, Envío 22
adjunto comando para recuperacion de mail zmmailbox -zadmin selectMailbox nombre_casi...@dominio.cl createfolder /Recovery su - zimbra zmprov gmi nombre_casi...@dominio.cl /opt/zimbra/bin/zmmailbox -z -m xxx...@hsalvador.cl addMessage /Recovery /directorio/donde/estan/los/msg/0/* El 17 de mayo de 2013 08:00, centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió: Envíe los mensajes para la lista CentOS-es a centos-es@centos.org Para subscribirse o anular su subscripción a través de la WEB http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es O por correo electrónico, enviando un mensaje con el texto help en el asunto (subject) o en el cuerpo a: centos-es-requ...@centos.org Puede contactar con el responsable de la lista escribiendo a: centos-es-ow...@centos.org Si responde a algún contenido de este mensaje, por favor, edite la linea del asunto (subject) para que el texto sea mas especifico que: Re: Contents of CentOS-es digest Además, por favor, incluya en la respuesta sólo aquellas partes del mensaje a las que está respondiendo. Asuntos del día: 1. RECOVERY ACCOUNTS ZIMBRA 8 (paulcrio...@gmail.com) 2. Re: RECOVERY ACCOUNTS ZIMBRA 8 (angel jauregui) 3. Error al mandar email (VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ) 4. Re: Error al mandar email (domin...@linuxsc.net) 5. Re: Error al mandar email (Ing. Ramon Resendiz) 6. Error al mandar email (VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ) 7. Re: Error al mandar email (domin...@linuxsc.net) 8. [OT] recomendar lista para Android (Eddy Olivo) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:20:47 -0500 From: paulcrio...@gmail.com Subject: [CentOS-es] RECOVERY ACCOUNTS ZIMBRA 8 To: CentOS-es@centos.org CentOS-es@centos.org Message-ID: cafpwnczbw9x9tdgwx4hmk2hq4s6nudw6dqmeket-cddvchg...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Saludos.. Por favor quisiera saber si alguna de ustedes, conoce algun metodo para recuperar los buzones con todos sus mensajes de zimbra, los cuales fueron eliminados por error Quedare agradecido por su apoyo. Se usa Zimbra 8.0.4 open source. att. Paul Criollo O. -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 15:45:53 -0500 From: angel jauregui darkdiabl...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] RECOVERY ACCOUNTS ZIMBRA 8 To: centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: capzihocwnu2encoj3dmlektw+x1a+iykm_zb_syhwthbts0...@mail.gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 de casualidad ya hiciste algun testdisk para ver si recuperas los archivos ? Saludos ! El 16 de mayo de 2013 15:20, paulcrio...@gmail.com escribió: Saludos.. Por favor quisiera saber si alguna de ustedes, conoce algun metodo para recuperar los buzones con todos sus mensajes de zimbra, los cuales fueron eliminados por error Quedare agradecido por su apoyo. Se usa Zimbra 8.0.4 open source. att. Paul Criollo O. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- M.S.I. Angel Haniel Cantu Jauregui. Celular: (011-52-1)-899-871-17-22 E-Mail: angel.ca...@sie-group.net Web: http://www.sie-group.net/ Cd. Reynosa Tamaulipas. -- Message: 3 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:33:26 -0500 From: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ victor...@hotmail.com Subject: [CentOS-es] Error al mandar email To: centos-es@centos.org centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: blu157-w521a021b716dd11cee4587bb...@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Estoy tratando de mandar mensajes des una terminal pero el servidor me costesta esto 'victor...@hotmail.com' en 16/05/2013 06:29 p.m. 550 5.7.1 victor...@hotmail.com... Relaying denied. IP name lookup failed [192.168.0.253] Esto es cuando los mando por que si recibo sin problema alguin sabe por donde puede estar el problema -- Message: 4 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 18:39:11 -0500 From: domin...@linuxsc.net Subject: Re: [CentOS-es] Error al mandar email To: centos-es@centos.org centos-es@centos.org,centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: 5b630756-5383-439a-ad1c-4c6743fb256b.maildroid@localhost Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Agrega el segmento de ips en el /etc/mail/access Después makemap -v access access Finalmente service sendmail restart Suerte Sent from my android device. One step ahead. -Original Message- From: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ victor...@hotmail.com To: centos-es@centos.org centos-es@centos.org Sent: jue, 16 may 2013 18:33 Subject: [CentOS-es] Error al mandar email Estoy tratando de mandar mensajes des una terminal pero el servidor me costesta esto 'victor...@hotmail.com' en 16/05/2013 06:29 p.m. 550 5.7.1 victor...@hotmail.com... Relaying
[CentOS-es] Error al mandar email
UNA PREGUNTA COMO PONGO EL SEGMENTO DE MI RED PARA QUE SALGAN TODAS IP Correcto... pero no se si funciona con /27 yo lo he hecho con el segmento completo ... 192.168.0 Sent from my android device. One step ahead. -Original Message- From: VICTOR MANUEL VARGAS GONZALEZ victorm95 en hotmail.com To: centos-es en centos.org centos-es en centos.org Sent: jue, 16 may 2013 18:57 Subject: [CentOS-es] Error al mandar email ya puse el segmento dentro del archivo asi a ver si esto bien 192.168.0/27 RELAY ASI ES CORRECTO Agrega el segmento de ips en el /etc/mail/access Después makemap -v access access Finalmente service sendmail restart Suerte Victor Manuel Vargas Gonzalez tel.57852626 ext.103 ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] device in use after a reboot
Hello, I have a server with an 17tb scsi-storage. In past, the storage has a jfs-filesystem. Now i want to create a ext4-filesystem. I have update the e2fsprogs from 1.41 to 1.42 (16tb limit 1.41). Now I have an 17tb-storage as /dev/sda1 with ext4. I can mount this device as /home/ (/etc/fstab /dev/sda1/home/ext4 defaults 1 2. Now I start a e2fschk /dev/sda1 (umounted). No error-messages are in the screen. If I now reboot the server, the server does not started: ---// Checking filesystems /dev/md2: clean, . /dev/md0: clean, . /dev/sda1 is in use. e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting. *** An error occurred during the file system check. *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot *** when you leave the shell. Give root password for maintenance (or type Control-D to continue): //--- I think thats can be a problem with the e2fsprogs 1.42, now i reinstall the server with the default e2fsprogs 1.41 from CentOS 6.4 and create only a 16tb /dev/sda1 partition with ext4. But if i start a e2fschk /dev/sda1 and reboot the server, i have the same message in the boot-screen and the server does not boot. Why the system thinks that the device still be in use? How can i change this? Thanks Sebastian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
unbelievable! after a reboot: sometimes: /dev/sda1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee GPT sometimes: /dev/sdc1 1 267350 2147483647+ ee GPT The server change the device-name.I'm confused - I will use the UUID in fstab Am 17.05.2013 11:22, schrieb sebastian: Hello, I have a server with an 17tb scsi-storage. In past, the storage has a jfs-filesystem. Now i want to create a ext4-filesystem. I have update the e2fsprogs from 1.41 to 1.42 (16tb limit 1.41). Now I have an 17tb-storage as /dev/sda1 with ext4. I can mount this device as /home/ (/etc/fstab /dev/sda1/home/ext4 defaults 1 2. Now I start a e2fschk /dev/sda1 (umounted). No error-messages are in the screen. If I now reboot the server, the server does not started: ---// Checking filesystems /dev/md2: clean, . /dev/md0: clean, . /dev/sda1 is in use. e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting. *** An error occurred during the file system check. *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot *** when you leave the shell. Give root password for maintenance (or type Control-D to continue): //--- I think thats can be a problem with the e2fsprogs 1.42, now i reinstall the server with the default e2fsprogs 1.41 from CentOS 6.4 and create only a 16tb /dev/sda1 partition with ext4. But if i start a e2fschk /dev/sda1 and reboot the server, i have the same message in the boot-screen and the server does not boot. Why the system thinks that the device still be in use? How can i change this? Thanks Sebastian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CVE-2013-2094 and CentOS 6.x
On 05/16/2013 01:19 PM, Jake Shipton wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2013 11:48:14 -0700 (PDT) David C. Miller mille...@fusion.gat.com wrote: For those who don't know yet here is the redhat bugzilla on this exploit. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962792 Does anyone know if CentOS 6 have the debug packages available to apply the temp patch for this listed in the bugzilla link? David. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Redhat have released a new kernel to fix the bug :-). https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0830.html CentOS has also released this: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2013-May/019733.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
On 05/17/2013 11:52 AM, sebastian wrote: sometimes: /dev/sdc1 Does dmesg say what /dev/sd[ab] is in this case? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sda: sdb: sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 35158450176 512-byte logical blocks: (18.0 TB/16.3 TiB) sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 8f 00 00 08 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdc: sda1 sda2 sda3 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk sdc1 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Attached SCSI disk md: bindsda1 md: bindsda3 md: bindsdb3 md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 bio: create slab bio-1 at 1 md/raid1:md2: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors created bitmap (3 pages) for device md2 md2: bitmap initialized from disk: read 1 pages, set 0 of 4342 bits md2: detected capacity change from 0 to 291335110656 md2: unknown partition table md: bindsdb1 md/raid1:md1: active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md1: detected capacity change from 0 to 8384348160 md1: unknown partition table EXT4-fs (md2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: dracut: Mounted root filesystem /dev/md2 Am 17.05.2013 12:13, schrieb Mogens Kjaer: On 05/17/2013 11:52 AM, sebastian wrote: sometimes: /dev/sdc1 Does dmesg say what /dev/sd[ab] is in this case? Mogens ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 99, Issue 8
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2013:0831 Moderate CentOS 6 libvirt Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2013:0830 Important CentOS 6 kernel Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 00:35:37 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0831 Moderate CentOS 6 libvirt
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20130517003537.ga14...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0831 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0831.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
5a32ff9a43563fa625339e17c72f9d0030c37739795c8dbd7214855357a1df31
libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
b0aaeb027d374f4efda4c8e63572ef5ce541de8d8a783886c51bdea8c1c81e93
libvirt-client-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
ff21809b7f8094694dbd1f56ddc528865779bb0d5ec4d92f2aa988d2b66ec09f
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
a5a19eb3740fa9e6c094763aa835e6f7c2a8bc7a5011863bf02340827983e803
libvirt-python-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
x86_64:
1f5989987a4f696420ca59034ef7468faf42ff6d44a2b821a0138c1f038f35a3
libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm
b0aaeb027d374f4efda4c8e63572ef5ce541de8d8a783886c51bdea8c1c81e93
libvirt-client-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
7bfae1084c8cc01f4e328d9acd1c93c81949c545463b72fbec518fdb5ca06678
libvirt-client-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm
ff21809b7f8094694dbd1f56ddc528865779bb0d5ec4d92f2aa988d2b66ec09f
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.i686.rpm
f4abd67b2614301da6c16cc0ffb69fd611bff1369faa694d9314d13769e3ce07
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm
25e82884d275305505133b373b1d42cfbfd0ce1e6b27daeba786ea8b97edcc62
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm
573b22172850a5da5e96ffe8fe72db605cfa1e7918d9f07ac92d606497b98d3f
libvirt-python-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
ae8026063f273636fcab9947c0711be9c53ea6c2e73f574f2408025e79cf641d
libvirt-0.10.2-18.el6_4.5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 00:36:04 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2013:0830 Important CentOS 6 kernel
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20130517003604.ga14...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0830 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2013-0830.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d6c94ff701e9d6772f164e87df48073eb7fc3ccbc5ec23bf27d59d084066b912
kernel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
68728b5f77c56b745477478fe9decc6245a9015cbf1d9a2c54c868606be9d010
kernel-debug-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
c862327110fa5efb09031a4618347d0a78d117c1482bf69c50423464e7d351d7
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
60d3d223fd5185bd7f9ee24bb8492dfef3cfe07bb6751542f240c351855c11d8
kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
e1fc1dd9210cda92fd773c05a796008ed481b61d3e99bdef601e87c1d0451ef2
kernel-doc-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.noarch.rpm
59f2d900bce7aeb443f72f00b9a8febed3a6e53f05e7668ef8cb42df5a03ac7f
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.noarch.rpm
e4b4d7e137ff7ee822cacc67d4e01bdbbdd0e87ce8688564274f1a2df361e419
kernel-headers-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
c30d700ed6271a2d88d261c5002b1185beeeffb10cbc44c740d89f19e9b37231
perf-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
cf4da5b6bac241b0836ba8330845d04a2d498982e1f294c3c403d962930f9fc7
python-perf-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
edc9ee434ce217fcca48ccfc6fa6a0378bd39f531da1ca3a0be7fef8f0373ffb
kernel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
355e8fadb8450359940a9008ac7700a3aebf8984bd7f1516fb7f68b6f1c33a04
kernel-debug-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
d9c0ccfc888ac4a922ca8b59418b75c588bddad145e030b3dd31924db3e6d576
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
a97cff3f2aa6d5169cca4464eeea5d0efd14c9d57fd65175a5ce91450f1d1448
kernel-devel-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.x86_64.rpm
e1fc1dd9210cda92fd773c05a796008ed481b61d3e99bdef601e87c1d0451ef2
kernel-doc-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.noarch.rpm
59f2d900bce7aeb443f72f00b9a8febed3a6e53f05e7668ef8cb42df5a03ac7f
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-358.6.2.el6.noarch.rpm
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
On 05/17/2013 01:23 PM, sebastian wrote: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) ... sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 35158450176 512-byte logical blocks: (18.0 TB/16.3 TiB) sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 8f 00 00 08 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdc: sda1 sda2 sda3 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk sdc1 So sd[ab] are two 300 GB disks, and sdc is the big storage. When the big storage shows up as sda, do the two disks show up as sd[bc] or are they absent? Mogens -- Mogens Kjaer, m...@lemo.dk http://www.lemo.dk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
Mogens Kjaer wrote: On 05/17/2013 01:23 PM, sebastian wrote: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] 586072368 512-byte logical blocks: (300 GB/279 GiB) ... sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] 35158450176 512-byte logical blocks: (18.0 TB/16.3 TiB) sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write Protect is off sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Mode Sense: 8f 00 00 08 sd 6:0:0:0: [sdc] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA sdc: sda1 sda2 sda3 sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk sdb1 sdb2 sdb3 sd 1:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk sdc1 So sd[ab] are two 300 GB disks, and sdc is the big storage. When the big storage shows up as sda, do the two disks show up as sd[bc] or are they absent? This is odd; I think I've only seen it once. I'd suggest using label or (bleah!) UUID. We prefer labels, since a) you can remember them, b) look for them, and c) there's no way to remember a UUID mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] F18: Create a USB install of CentOS 6 from iso
Hi all, On a F18, I installed livecd-tools-18.15-1 I downloaded CenOS6.x minimal .iso and with livecd-iso-to-disk the resulting USB is never bootable: the computer doesnt boot on it. Tested on many computers. The fact is I succeded to install CentOS on a Netbook (no CD/DVD tray), but I dont remember how I invoked livecd-iso-to-disk. I tried with many combinations (/dev/sdc is the USB pendrive): 1°) $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk --format --force ISO /dev/sdc 2°) $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk --format --force ISO /dev/sdc1 3°) - Format with VFAT on partiion #1 then $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk ISO /dev/sdc1 4°) - Format with Ext on partiion #1 then $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk ISO /dev/sdc1 ... N°) I dont remember what I tried, but it was many, mostly tried with CentOS 6.2 Please, if someone has a F18 + an USB drive: would you test and see if you succed? If you ever succed, how did you? -- RMA. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] F18: Create a USB install of CentOS 6 from iso
I don't know how livecd-iso-to-disk works in detail, but can you post the output of fdisk -l usb stick device? Maybe also an ls -l of the root directory. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] python-pandas 10
Anyone familiar with building python modules? We've got a user who needs pandas 10 - he says that there was a memory handling issue that kills him in the lower releases. My counterpart (the humanoid one g) says that it seems to want to build against python 2.7, rather than the CentOS 2.6.6. Plus, of course, there are the dependencies 1. Are there any tarball installs? 2. Alternatively, are there any src rpms? I haven't found any so far Thanks in advance. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for encrypted software RAID 1?
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:42 AM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote: On 05/15/2013 12:22 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: I'm setting up a computer with CentOS 6.4 and a mirrored software RAID. I would like it to be encrypted so I was wondering what the best configuration is. The only info I could find is http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-docs/2008-October/001912.html but it appears to be a bit old and the info on the wiki ( http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/EncryptTmpSwapHome ) doesn't seem to address RAIDs. My main question is will it be better to encrypt the RAID itself or the two partitions used by the RAID? Any other things I should be aware of? Thanks, Dave This depends on your use-case. Personally, I want my servers to be able to boot headless, so I leave /boot, swap and / unencrypted, RAID or /boot absolutely can't be encrypted I use LUKS in conjunction with Serial over LAN ... otherwise I'd have to manually mount (or script it) so my encrypted volume is mounted. In my case as well, I only have the volume where my backup data goes ... so /boot, /, and others are not encrypted (no need). not. Then I encrypt the LV (or partition) I am going to put data I care about on. I don't think there is any benefit to encrypting the partitions behind the MD device as it won't be able to form until you decrypt the devices. I'd keep crypt on the resulting /dev/mdX, at the lowest. Create a software raid array and then create your LUKS encrypted volume on top of that md device. It is *highly recommended* to write random data to the underlying disk device prior to creating the LUKS volume. I believe I referenced [0] on the Arch Linux wiki a bunch way back when, but you'll find other great references on the Gentoo wiki as well. cryptsetup is the utility you're looking for. (As I'm sure you already know...since your mailing list link mentions it.) :) Again, it depends on your use-case. -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/ What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without access to education? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt_with_LUKS Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually doing this through an Anaconda config file and I'm using the following settings: part raid.boota --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.bootb --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid /boot --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.boota raid.bootb part raid.slasha --grow --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.slashb --grow --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --encrypted --passphrase=passphrase --device=md1 raid.slasha raid.slashb Is that the right way to do it? Or is there a configuration that would work better? Thanks, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] device in use after a reboot
Hi, So sd[ab] are two 300 GB disks, and sdc is the big storage. I think this is not so uncommon. In my experience this has to do with the initialization of PCIe controller cards. I assume you are using a RAID controller, right? I saw that with Areca RAID-controllers in the past as well with LSI-controller these days. I am using UUID for that purpose. Not really convenient, but safe. You probably don't have to change that as soon as it is running, so the strange UUID designators are no big issue. best regards --- Michael Schumacher PAMAS Partikelmess- und Analysesysteme GmbH Dieselstr.10, D-71277 Rutesheim Tel +49-7152-99630 Fax +49-7152-996333 Geschäftsführer: Gerhard Schreck Handelsregister B Stuttgart HRB 252024 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for encrypted software RAID 1?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote: [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt_with_LUKS Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually doing this through an Anaconda config file and I'm using the following settings: part raid.boota --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.bootb --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid /boot --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.boota raid.bootb part raid.slasha --grow --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.slashb --grow --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --encrypted --passphrase=passphrase --device=md1 raid.slasha raid.slashb Is that the right way to do it? Or is there a configuration that would work better? That looks right. Maybe somebody else will have a tip. The key to your puzzle is --encrypted and you've got that. I don't have a kickstart config that has both software raid and luks encryption, so that's a scenario I have not tested. Sounds like a perfect lab to spin up a VM on a Friday! :) Thanks, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for encrypted software RAID 1?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote: [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt_with_LUKS Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually doing this through an Anaconda config file and I'm using the following settings: part raid.boota --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.bootb --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid /boot --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.boota raid.bootb part raid.slasha --grow --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.slashb --grow --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --encrypted --passphrase=passphrase --device=md1 raid.slasha raid.slashb Is that the right way to do it? Or is there a configuration that would work better? That looks right. Maybe somebody else will have a tip. You might also reference the advanced example here [0]. [0] http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html#s2-kickstart2-options-part-examples The key to your puzzle is --encrypted and you've got that. I don't have a kickstart config that has both software raid and luks encryption, so that's a scenario I have not tested. Sounds like a perfect lab to spin up a VM on a Friday! :) Thanks, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] F18: Create a USB install of CentOS 6 from iso
On 05/17/2013 11:06 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: Hi all, On a F18, I installed livecd-tools-18.15-1 I downloaded CenOS6.x minimal .iso and with livecd-iso-to-disk the resulting USB is never bootable: the computer doesnt boot on it. Tested on many computers. The fact is I succeded to install CentOS on a Netbook (no CD/DVD tray), but I dont remember how I invoked livecd-iso-to-disk. I tried with many combinations (/dev/sdc is the USB pendrive): 1°) $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk --format --force ISO /dev/sdc 2°) $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk --format --force ISO /dev/sdc1 3°) - Format with VFAT on partiion #1 then $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk ISO /dev/sdc1 4°) - Format with Ext on partiion #1 then $ sudo livecd-iso-to-disk ISO /dev/sdc1 ... N°) I dont remember what I tried, but it was many, mostly tried with CentOS 6.2 Please, if someone has a F18 + an USB drive: would you test and see if you succed? If you ever succed, how did you? This sounds like something you should post to the Fedora Users list. The problem probably lies with the F18 application, not with the CentOS ISO image. -- _ °v° /(_)\ ^ ^ Mark LaPierre Registered Linux user No #267004 https://linuxcounter.net/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Best configuration for encrypted software RAID 1?
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:04 PM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM, SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.comwrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.comwrote: [0] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt_with_LUKS Thanks for the feedback. I'm actually doing this through an Anaconda config file and I'm using the following settings: part raid.boota --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.bootb --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid /boot --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --device=md0 raid.boota raid.bootb part raid.slasha --grow --size=500 --ondisk sda part raid.slashb --grow --size=500 --ondisk sdb raid / --fstype=ext4 --level=1 --encrypted --passphrase=passphrase --device=md1 raid.slasha raid.slashb Is that the right way to do it? Or is there a configuration that would work better? That looks right. Maybe somebody else will have a tip. You might also reference the advanced example here [0]. [0] http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-kickstart2-options.html#s2-kickstart2-options-part-examples That example is helpful for the RAID stuff, but it doesn't show an example of encryption and so that's what my question is really about. Should the raid line have the encryption like I have in my example? Or should it be on each of the partitions? I'm just curious if there's a pro/con to each of those options. My very basic/quick testing seemed to indicate that doing it on the raid line was the better solution, but I was just wondering if anyone had experience with this? Thanks, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
