[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0899 CentOS 6 perl-Makefile-Parser FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0899
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0899.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
917a6022cbd65be7cf77923f01cc940eafba78e7fed0cd731f9e0881189366a3
perl-Makefile-Parser-0.211-2.el6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
917a6022cbd65be7cf77923f01cc940eafba78e7fed0cd731f9e0881189366a3
perl-Makefile-Parser-0.211-2.el6.noarch.rpm
Source:
fa6fb1142a0cdfb2343269fcfb29d56853edea1c65ae9ba125b8eca8c5fc2dff
perl-Makefile-Parser-0.211-2.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-es] problemas con hp mini
Buenos días tengo una hp mini 110-3805la, hace cinco días lo deje encendido pero el monitor cerrado, y para mala suerte se agoto la batería, ahora intento encender pero es como si estuviera en modo de ahorro de energía no se ve nada en la pantalla probé de conectar un monitor externo, ahí envía señal sin problemas, pero en su monitor muestra como si estuviera sin brillo, use la tecla fn+F3 que es para subir el brillo, pero no reacciona, ya lo quite la pila de la placa tampoco reacciona, y creo que no es problema de pantalla alguien puede dar algo de luz Atte Jose Manuel GPG Key ID: UBCMEOLVQMHEILINJBE ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Nueva targeta de red
Hola a toda la lista, alguien me puede decir si sabe como se puede agregar una nueva targeta de red en fedora 16 o superior, es que no me reconoce la nueva targeta de red. Fue un cambio ya que la que tenia se dañó. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 100, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2013:0892 CentOS 5 rgmanager Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2013:0891 CentOS 6 setuptool FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CEBA-2013:0893 CentOS 6 selinux-policy Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2013:0898 Moderate CentOS 5 mesa Update (Johnny Hughes)
5. CESA-2013:0897 Important CentOS 6 mesa Update (Johnny Hughes)
6. CESA-2013:0896 Moderate CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:48:18 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0892 CentOS 5 rgmanager Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20130603114818.ga27...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0892
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0892.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
9990c86eb1cbcef8237cce912d59b4e2758e8473a85d70de068e51e2348cdc0f
rgmanager-2.0.52-37.el5.centos.3.i386.rpm
x86_64:
e8d6e01befd489b81022b98d2ffcb7b96b3a2cc8666fd5eb632d09bb4ab1d763
rgmanager-2.0.52-37.el5.centos.3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
276c23ce42ca75b3dd2f25ee0e57b21024142a188a20bf7f2a06a1e1f44c7700
rgmanager-2.0.52-37.el5.centos.3.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:34:31 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0891 CentOS 6 setuptool FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20130603123431.ga53...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0891
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0891.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
36446fd8595d5da4756548ddee55c2d6cea5276a2f4f7598d6fd260cd289d45c
setuptool-1.19.9-4.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
e5784303d1779bc601a30eceb4621e27cb08a566c9aaa26edaa4ea1dd7ee8e25
setuptool-1.19.9-4.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c3bd69242b65f88995c3b7395c1fd2088b366c07fcbef24b14e82b5c14789ca9
setuptool-1.19.9-4.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:34:48 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:0893 CentOS 6 selinux-policy
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: 20130603123448.ga53...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:0893
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0893.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ed2e81c6e49bc95e9fc856e56ef5d556ce01a8320da3ddc473e93dc080d10f38
selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
ca73161d06dfc52932895e0e09f35ba0edece97ef152a61fd13c51c659a14fe5
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
26bdf1b81f9cab8776559f7c5dfc3e35934c9d47ea7c0b7810e5e5401745dd74
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
9b49abbe0a66c428af17f494ae1caaadccc5330e805848d73d5a0b39d8859b1a
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
a4d07b07952cd24b2f9265801ce215d4a5925aebb8560788c15471f30871ef4e
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
x86_64:
ed2e81c6e49bc95e9fc856e56ef5d556ce01a8320da3ddc473e93dc080d10f38
selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
ca73161d06dfc52932895e0e09f35ba0edece97ef152a61fd13c51c659a14fe5
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
26bdf1b81f9cab8776559f7c5dfc3e35934c9d47ea7c0b7810e5e5401745dd74
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
9b49abbe0a66c428af17f494ae1caaadccc5330e805848d73d5a0b39d8859b1a
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
a4d07b07952cd24b2f9265801ce215d4a5925aebb8560788c15471f30871ef4e
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.noarch.rpm
Source:
79646b7d323685762c33a61b26648937de05ea39317ff41acfb6c4a76ca6be04
selinux-policy-3.7.19-195.el6_4.6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
[CentOS] Centos6.4 routing problem
dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=cdfe1d58-c56c-47fc-8a93-5df2e168d176 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no DNS2=195.238.2.22 DNS1=192.168.66.1 IPADDR=192.168.66.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 GATEWAY=192.168.66.1 and one nic serving the lan and dhpcd. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2 DEVICE=em2 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2c NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=e72a17b6-fb5f-43f0-9136-fa4d92b542ae IPADDR=192.168.70.129 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no in iptables, prerouting and masquerading are configured : # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -A POSTROUTING -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE -A POSTROUTING -o em2 -j MASQUERADE COMMIT *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i lo -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o em2 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT and in /etc/sysctl.conf ipforwarding is set to 1 # Kernel sysctl configuration file for Red Hat Linux # # For binary values, 0 is disabled, 1 is enabled. See sysctl(8) and # sysctl.conf(5) for more details. # Controls IP packet forwarding net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 clients get ip adresses from dhcp server, and there's no other dhcp server on the lan. But clients cannot ping the public internet, e.g. 8.8.8.8 the only EM I'm seeing is when executing command : [root@centoshofkwartier ~]# sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 kernel.sysrq = 0 kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 1 error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables is an unknown key error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables is an unknown key error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables is an unknown key kernel.msgmnb = 65536 kernel.msgmax = 65536 kernel.shmmax = 68719476736 kernel.shmall = 4294967296 I switched the cables and switches, and changed the connection with the public internet. Can anybody offer some advise on this? Greetings, J. -- Johan Vermeulen IT-medewerker Caw De Kempen Opensource Software is the future. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 routing problem
Johan Vermeulen wrote: dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: First, we always have BOOTPROTO set - in your case, assuming you're getting em1's IP from DHCP, you should have that; in the case of em2, it's BOOTPROTO=static. As it is, I'd think (without testing) that em1 is trying to present a reserved IP to the 'Net, which is a no-no. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=cdfe1d58-c56c-47fc-8a93-5df2e168d176 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no DNS2=195.238.2.22 DNS1=192.168.66.1 IPADDR=192.168.66.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 GATEWAY=192.168.66.1 and one nic serving the lan and dhpcd. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2 DEVICE=em2 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2c NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=e72a17b6-fb5f-43f0-9136-fa4d92b542ae IPADDR=192.168.70.129 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no snip Secondly, what does route show? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 routing problem
hello Mark, thanks for the help. Op 04-06-13 15:56, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef: Johan Vermeulen wrote: dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: First, we always have BOOTPROTO set - in your case, assuming you're getting em1's IP from DHCP, you should have that; in the case of em2, it's BOOTPROTO=static. As it is, I'd think (without testing) that em1 is trying to present a reserved IP to the 'Net, which is a no-no. both ifcfg's now have BOOTPROTO=static and I restarted network and dhcpd. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=cdfe1d58-c56c-47fc-8a93-5df2e168d176 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no DNS2=195.238.2.22 DNS1=192.168.66.1 IPADDR=192.168.66.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 GATEWAY=192.168.66.1 and one nic serving the lan and dhpcd. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2 DEVICE=em2 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2c NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=e72a17b6-fb5f-43f0-9136-fa4d92b542ae IPADDR=192.168.70.129 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no snip Secondly, what does route show? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos [root@centoshofkwartier ~]# route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.70.128 * 255.255.255.128 U 0 00 em2 192.168.66.0* 255.255.255.128 U 0 00 em1 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1002 00 em1 link-local * 255.255.0.0 U 1003 00 em2 default 192.168.66.10.0.0.0 UG0 00 em1 greetings, J. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 routing problem
On 06/04/2013 09:20 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: dear All, I'm facing this routing problem, the setup is actualy part of ltsp, but I think this problem is Centos-specific. The server is a Dell Poweredge R210. The install is standard 6.4, updated. I have one nic facing the public internet: vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em1 DEVICE=em1 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2b NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=cdfe1d58-c56c-47fc-8a93-5df2e168d176 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no DNS2=195.238.2.22 DNS1=192.168.66.1 IPADDR=192.168.66.5 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 GATEWAY=192.168.66.1 and one nic serving the lan and dhpcd. vi /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-em2 DEVICE=em2 BOOTPROTO=none HWADDR=d4:ae:52:c1:28:2c NM_CONTROLLED=no ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet UUID=e72a17b6-fb5f-43f0-9136-fa4d92b542ae IPADDR=192.168.70.129 NETMASK=255.255.255.128 IPV6INIT=no USERCTL=no in iptables, prerouting and masquerading are configured : # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -A POSTROUTING -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE -A POSTROUTING -o em2 -j MASQUERADE Shouldn't this be em1? COMMIT *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i lo -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o em2 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT and in /etc/sysctl.conf ipforwarding is set to 1 # Kernel sysctl configuration file for Red Hat Linux # # For binary values, 0 is disabled, 1 is enabled. See sysctl(8) and # sysctl.conf(5) for more details. # Controls IP packet forwarding net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 clients get ip adresses from dhcp server, and there's no other dhcp server on the lan. But clients cannot ping the public internet, e.g. 8.8.8.8 the only EM I'm seeing is when executing command : [root@centoshofkwartier ~]# sysctl -p /etc/sysctl.conf net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter = 1 net.ipv4.conf.default.accept_source_route = 0 kernel.sysrq = 0 kernel.core_uses_pid = 1 net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies = 1 error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-ip6tables is an unknown key error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-iptables is an unknown key error: net.bridge.bridge-nf-call-arptables is an unknown key kernel.msgmnb = 65536 kernel.msgmax = 65536 kernel.shmmax = 68719476736 kernel.shmall = 4294967296 I switched the cables and switches, and changed the connection with the public internet. Can anybody offer some advise on this? Greetings, J. -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.4 routing problem
On 06/04/2013 04:20 PM, Steve Clark wrote: On 06/04/2013 09:20 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote: in iptables, prerouting and masquerading are configured : # Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall # Manual customization of this file is not recommended. *nat :PREROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [0:0] -A POSTROUTING -o eth+ -j MASQUERADE -A POSTROUTING -o em2 -j MASQUERADE Shouldn't this be em1? Yes, -o is outgoing and it should be em1, not em2 COMMIT *filter :INPUT ACCEPT [0:0] :FORWARD ACCEPT [0:0] :OUTPUT ACCEPT [0:0] -A INPUT -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i lo -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 22 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -p icmp -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i lo -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -i em2 -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o eth+ -j ACCEPT -A FORWARD -o em2 -j ACCEPT Check if you should have this line. It has been a long time I needed to use iptables for forwarding, nut I do not remember using -A FORWARD and -o together. Do you at all need all those -A FORWARD lines for masquerading? -A INPUT -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited -A FORWARD -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-host-prohibited COMMIT -- Ljubomir Ljubojevic (Love is in the Air) PL Computers Serbia, Europe StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cert RHCSA
On 06/02/2013 11:39 AM, Micky wrote: Unless you really wanna spend money on it, I would say that certification is just a piece of paper. Ah discard that, in this case, it is not even a piece of paper since you don't get one after passing! Have been there, seen the guys who knew more than CEs or SAs. Just get the books, read them, study the docs and put it to use! This is just not true. Most companies who actually hire workers and pay salaries want certified people. One can certainly get a job without a certification and it does not mean that the person who has a certification is the best thing since sliced bread ... however, it certainly proves that the person with the certification has a certain set of minimal qualifications. In other words, it does not raise the ceiling (or high water mark or maximum) for knowledge level, but it certainly raises the floor (or low water mark or minimum) knowledge that you know the person has. It also shows that they are at least a little concerned about what they look like professionally. In my experience, people who complain about how little certifications mean don't have any and are too lazy to care about getting any ... your mileage may vary. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
