Re: [CentOS] MySQL stale socket
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I can confirm that this is a bug added to the latest releases og MySQL. I tested it only in VM (both VMware and XEN). How to reproduce. * start a CentOS VM with MySQL * abruptly turn the VM off (not shutdown, of course) * restart VM * MySQL starts but the connections via /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock do not work Jake Shipton said the following on 16/12/2013 11:12: > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 10:51:54 +0100 Luigi Rosa wrote: > >> >> I have a server with a faulty power supply that resets the server every >> 4/5 hours. >> >> While I wait for the supplier to change the PS, I am facing an issue with >> MySQL. >> >> When the system comes back on, mysqld script starts the daemon, but the >> connections via /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock don't work because MySQL >> doesn't delete and recreate the stale socket. >> >> Apart from editing /etc/init.d/mysqld to force the deletion of a stale >> socket are there any other way to solve this issue? >> >> >> Thank you un advance. >> >> >> Ciao, luigi >> >> >> ___ CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > Hi, > > As a *temporary* solution you could do the following: > > # chkconfig mysqld off # nano /etc/rc.local Add at bottom: rm > /var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock service mysqld start Now Save. > > Next time the machine boots it should remove the sock file, and then start > mysqld. > > Once your PSU is fixed, remove those lines and run: > > # chkconfig mysqld on > > Job done! :-D > > Hope this helps. > > Kind Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: > 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F > ___ CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ ANOTHER GLITCH IN THE CALL We don't need no indirection We don't need no flow control No data typing or declarations Did you leave those lists alone Hey! Hacker! Leave those lists alone! All in all, it's just a pure-Lisp function call -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEUEARECAAYFAlKz7nMACgkQ3kWu7Tfl6ZRW6QCY/x0h/O6cl42hmUO3kcLstzBC JgCfcMizFR6axWBbzsGnnNNG8RmWx20= =h+P3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Headless system
Billy Crook writes: > > What about when special modules need to be in the initrd for hardware > upon which boot depends (raid cards, SAN HBAs, NICs sometimes)? > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 9:26 AM, David G. Miller wrote: > > Ashley M. Kirchner ...> writes: > > > >> > >> So I'm in a bit of a pickle ... I have a machine that needs to be > >> repurposed from WinXP to CentOS. I downloaded the CentOS DVD and all then > >> realized ... I don't have a keyboard/mouse for the machine. It only has > >> USB ports on it, and I don't have a single available USB keyboard that I > >> can plug in. Bit of a problem. > >> > >> Usually what I do is install via VNC anyway, but that is contingent on me > >> already having something on the machine that allows me to connect to it so > >> that when it boots up, I can edit the boot parameters and enable VNC. I > >> don't have that this time. > >> > >> So, the question is: can I make a DVD image that starts the installer with > >> VNC options set and if so, how do I go about that? > >> > > > > > > Kind of "don't raise the bridge, lower the river suggestion:" > > > > Pull the hard drive and put it in another system long enough to do the > > install. As long as the chip architecture is the same (32bit vs. 64 bit), > > it should work fine. It should work even if one system is Intel and the > > other AMD. > > > > Cheers, > > Dave > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@... > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > 1) I give Ashley credit for knowing his systems and knowing if the system in question needs such a kernel module in order to boot. 2) Fairly low likelihood that the system needs such a module in order to even boot. Might need it for full functionality but that can be handled later. 3) I carry around a USB hard disk with Fedora on it. If I can get a system to boot from the drive, it always seems to work. Experience says most systems will boot without any non-standard pieces. Cheers, Dave ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/19/2013 6:43 PM, Darr247 wrote: > On 20 DEC 2013 @02:06 zulu, John R Pierce wrote: >> >how many XP systems are still in use? > We have 3 XP desktops connected to the LAN in our home. that was a rhetorical question, of course I'd expect THIS email list to be skewed heavily away from the global norm. I suspect there's 100 to 1000 XP systems for every RHEL/CentOS desktop workstation on a global basis. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 20 DEC 2013 @02:06 zulu, John R Pierce wrote: > how many XP systems are still in use? We have 3 XP desktops connected to the LAN in our home. We also have 3 Win7 laptops. I used to dual-boot fedora on one of the laptops, until windows refused to apply SP1 because of grub's alterations to the MBR... it was happy to install with Dell's MBR, though (which starts up their customized version of CyberLink's PowerCinema, called MediaDirect) when an alternate 'On' button is used). > how many people use C6 as a desktop? I have 2 (it's not that I *hate* GNOME3 as much as I'm waiting for as many bugs as possible to be worked out before I'm forced to give up something that works fine and use something that, well... doesn't; preferably one in which alacarte is functional and actually edits/saves the GNOME3 menus). I also have used the script from http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/ to install google's Chrome repo and Chrome 28+ (up to version 31.something now) on both those C6 machines, and am completely happy with the way it sequesters the updated libs (grabbed from a fedora 15 archive repo) from the 'stock' libs so only Chrome accesses and uses them. Melly xmas. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
On 12/19/2013 5:48 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > How can XP, an ancient OS going EOL in a few months, still be > supported for the latest Chromium but C6 not? how many XP systems are still in use? how many people use C6 as a desktop? also, Microsoft has done a remarkable version of maintaining BINARY compatibility across many versions, something Linux has traditionally eschewed. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] And then there was one (browser)
About 6 months has passed since the last working version of Opera (12.16) for Linux was released. Opera 18 (Win+Mac only) is now based on Chromium so I'm not holding my breath for it to work with C6 even if it is ever released. Chrome/Chromium is pretty much history too (libs too old). So Firefox is the only game in town. Even lesser knowns like Midori won't work either. Considering the amount of time left in the C6 support cycle, one would have thought TUV would have worked with Google to find a solution but I haven't heard a peep. How can XP, an ancient OS going EOL in a few months, still be supported for the latest Chromium but C6 not? Does anyone know of secret plans to eventually support Chrome/Chromium on C6? (crossing fingers) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS, linux and kernel version
Ah, right. I was assuming (maybe erroneously) that the OP knew what was on his/her system. 8-) Cheers, Cliff On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:05 AM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Cliff Pratt >wrote: > > > 3.9.3 is the kernel number. All Linux distributions use the Linux kernel, > > so Debian version X and CentOS version Y may use the same kernel as may > > Ubuntu version Z. There may be a list of CentOS versions and kernel > numbers > > somewhere, but I can't see that it would be of great interest. > > > > CentOS 6.5 doesn't ship with a 3.x kernel. If it was a 2.6.32-something > kernel then it would likely be an official kernel ... not a 3.x though. > Possibly from elrepo or another third party repo. > > That's why this might be of interest to the OP. > > > > > > My Ubuntu 13.10 shows 3.11.0 so you have a fairly old Ubuntu version > there. > > In general the Ubuntu kernel will be newer than the more conservative > > CentOS/RHEL. > > > > Cheers > > Cliff > > > > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Jayadevan Maymala < > > jayadevan.technol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > I am using CentOS 6.4. > > > uname -r gives me > > > > > > 3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions - > > > > > > What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version > numbers. > > > > > > Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the numbers like 3.9 and > > > kernel versions maintained somewhere? > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jayadevan > > > ___ > > > CentOS mailing list > > > CentOS@centos.org > > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > > > > -- > ---~~.~~--- > Mike > // SilverTip257 // > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] quota and selinux on centos 6.5
Hi, I'm facing a challenge with selinux and because I don't got an explanation elsewhere, I'm trying to explain here. I have decided to mount /var/spool/cron on a separate partition and apply quota for regular users. But quotacheck replyes with a "permission denied" . quotacheck: Cannot create new quotafile /var/spool/cron/aquota.user.new: Permission denied quotacheck: Cannot initialize IO on new quotafile: Permission denied Indeed, files in that directory has a context witch denies quotacheck process to write files. To became suitable fo quota, those files (aquota.user and aquota.group) must have quota_db_t type(in context). If I use restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user , it reports that is no default context for that file. [root@CentOS active]# touch /var/spool/cron/aquota.user [root@CentOS active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/ [root@CentOS active]# ls -lZ /var/spool/cron/ -rw-r--r--. root root unconfined_u:object_r:user_cron_spool_t:s0 aquota.user [root@CentOS active]# restorecon /var/spool/cron/aquota.user restorecon: Warning no default label for /var/spool/cron/aquota.user Semanage reports this [root@CentOS active]# semanage fcontext -l|grep quota /a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /boot/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /etc/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /sbin/quota(check|on) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/convertquota regular file system_u:object_r:quota_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/quota_nld regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_exec_t:s0 /usr/sbin/rpc\.rquotad regular file system_u:object_r:rpcd_exec_t:s0 /var/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/lib/openshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/lib/quota(/.*)? all files system_u:object_r:quota_flag_t:s0 /var/lib/stickshift/a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 /var/run/quota_nld\.pid regular file system_u:object_r:quota_nld_var_run_t:s0 /var/spool/(.*/)?a?quota\.(user|group) regular file system_u:object_r:quota_db_t:s0 Take a look on the last file . Isn't a default context for /var/spool/cron/aquota.user ?It looks like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703871 What's your opinion? Elji Udia ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public
On 12/19/2013 12:16, Connie Sieh wrote: > Look at > > lftp ftp.redhat.com:/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages> ls libedit* Thanks for the tip. The VM I'm testing RHEL 7 beta on isn't network-connected, so I guess I'm just going to have to mirror that directory. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Warren Young wrote: > On 12/17/2013 18:57, Andrew Wyatt wrote: >> Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they >> didn't fit on the media though, Look at lftp ftp.redhat.com:/redhat/rhel/beta/7/x86_64/os/Packages> ls libedit* libedit-3.0-10.20121213cvs.el7.i686.rpm libedit-3.0-10.20121213cvs.el7.x86_64.rpm libedit-devel-3.0-10.20121213cvs.el7.i686.rpm libedit-devel-3.0-10.20121213cvs.el7.x86_64.rpm # rpm -qlp libedit-3.0-10.20121213cvs.el7.x86_64.rpm /usr/lib64/libedit.so.0 /usr/lib64/libedit.so.0.0.42 /usr/share/doc/libedit-3.0 /usr/share/doc/libedit-3.0/COPYING /usr/share/doc/libedit-3.0/ChangeLog /usr/share/doc/libedit-3.0/THANKS -Connie Sieh > > I've run into two of these myself: libedit and libgd. Both of these are > living, useful libraries, without direct replacements.[*] > > Clearly there are RPMs shipped in the distro that require these > libraries. I guess Red Hat are saying that they don't intend that you > develop your *own* software against these libraries. > > > > [*] (libedit is API-compatible with readline, but most apps that use it > do so in order to avoid the GPL. There are many alternatives to GD, but > none are API-compatible.) > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHEL 7 Beta is now public
On 12/17/2013 18:57, Andrew Wyatt wrote: > Yes, there are many missing -devel packages. It's possible that they > didn't fit on the media though, I've run into two of these myself: libedit and libgd. Both of these are living, useful libraries, without direct replacements.[*] Clearly there are RPMs shipped in the distro that require these libraries. I guess Red Hat are saying that they don't intend that you develop your *own* software against these libraries. [*] (libedit is API-compatible with readline, but most apps that use it do so in order to avoid the GPL. There are many alternatives to GD, but none are API-compatible.) ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " ?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 09:56:36AM -0800, Keith Keller wrote: > > You can disable the message with biff n (IIRC). You can also redirect > root's (future) mail to a user mailbox by modifying /etc/aliases and > running newaliases when done. (That will not do anything with mail > already delivered to root.) man bash; "Shell Variables" MAILCHECK Specifies how often (in seconds) bash checks for mail. The default is 60 seconds. When it is time to check for mail, the shell does so before displaying the primary prompt. If this variable is unset, or set to a value that is not a number greater than or equal to zero, the shell disables mail checking. John -- As I approve of a youth that has something of the old man in him, so am I no less pleased with an old man that has something of the youth. He that follows this rule may be old in body, but can never be so in mind. -- Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 BC - 43 BC) pgpf4n3ccePaZ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " ?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Norah Jones wrote: > > 4. Is this message gain any importance ? No one else can decide what is important to you. But it can be things like 'your hard disk is about to fail'. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " ?
On 2013-12-19, Norah Jones wrote: > > Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " in > CentOs? > > My queries are the following - > 1. Why this is generated ? Because root has mail in his mailbox. > 2. How to disable this ? You can disable the message with biff n (IIRC). You can also redirect root's (future) mail to a user mailbox by modifying /etc/aliases and running newaliases when done. (That will not do anything with mail already delivered to root.) > 3. Is this system generated ? The message is system-generated. The mail is very likely output from various system jobs, like cron jobs or other daemons. In theory a person could have send a message to root but that's not very common. > 4. Is this message gain any importance ? The only way to know is by reading the messages! Some of them may simply be informational, others may be important. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS, linux and kernel version
On 2013-12-19, Jayadevan Maymala wrote: > I am using CentOS 6.4. > uname -r gives me > > 3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions - Your current running kernel version is 3.9.3. Someone has installed a kernel from a source other than the base CentOS repository and booted it. You may have 2.6.32 installed somewhere on this box, but it wasn't used for this boot. > What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version numbers. /boot is not authoritative for the running kernel, because /boot can hold many different kernels (or really anything you put there). uname is authoritative for the current running kernel, and grub is (mostly) authoritative for the kernels available on the next boot. > Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the numbers like 3.9 and > kernel versions maintained somewhere? You can look in the vault: http://vault.centos.org/6.4/ Keep in mind that there may be more than one distributed kernel for a given CentOS release, since there are updates to packages as well. --keith -- kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ZFS on Linux testing
On 12/19/2013, 04:00 , li...@benjamindsmith.com wrote: > BackupPC is a great product, and if I knew of it and/or it was available > when I started, I would likely have used it instead of cutting code. Now > that we've got BackupBuddy working and integrated, we aren't going to be > switching as it has worked wonderfully for a decade with very few issues > and little oversight. > > I would differentiate BackupBuddy in that there is no "incremental" and > "full" distinction. All backups are "full" in the truest sense of the > word, and all backups are stored as native files on the backup server. > This works using rsync's hard-link option to minimize wasted disk space. > This means that the recovery process is just copying the files you need. > Also, graceful recovery for downtime and optimistic disk space usage are > both very nice. (it will try to keep as many backup savepoints as it can > disk space depending) > > I'm evaluating ZFS and will likely include some features of ZFS into > BBuddy as we integrate these capabilities into our backup processes. > We're free to do this in part because we have redundant backup sets, so > a single failure wouldn't be catastrophic in the short/medium term. > > -Ben I would agree that BackupPC is a great tool, stable and well respected, and I have to admit I didn't give it a fair chance before moving on to a simple, crude homebrew solution many years ago. One thing I neglected to mention about using inotify+lsync for a near-real-time secondary file server is that if the primary server croaks, I can quickly switch users to the secondary. When the primary server is repaired, a one-shot rsync to it brings it back to the current state of users' files. This conflicts a bit with non-deletion of old files on the secondary, but it keeps users going while repairs are made. I haven't had to use this trick ... yet. ZFS Raid-z3 and disk hot swap have done their jobs well so far. I'm toying with the idea of keeping a marker file on the secondary whose timestamp can be used to limit rsync back to the primary to only those files which got added while the secondary was being used. That would take care of the non-deleted files issue on the secondary. Fortunately there are no database files involved in any of this. Chuck ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog )
On 19/12/2013 10:05 PM, ken wrote: > On 12/18/2013 06:31 PM Peter wrote: >> On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote: >>> But, When my server handle a big file .. >>> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory. >>> so, what you thinking now ? :D >> I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're >> trying to solve a non-issue. >> >> >> Peter > It's good to remember that we were all once new to linux, that some > people whose first language isn't English face a much tougher challenge > learning and speaking about it, and that we're all here for helping-- to > receive help and to give help. > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Thank you very much for understanding ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple-Scan
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > On Thu 19 Dec 2013 08:48:35 AM EST, Scott Robbins wrote: >> It looks like Nux Desktop and LinuxTECH repos have it. Untested by me. >> In the case of the Nux Desktop x86_64 one (LinuxTECH only has i686) > > Caveat: don't mix those two repos. Either one by itself works fine; > mixed not so fine. I use both on a few machines, and both work well, > individually. I had one machine with both; not a good idea. I second this. Both repos are great but use just one of them on a given system. If you find some package(s) missing, try contacting the maintainer and see if that can be added. The maintainers (NuxRo and megatux/tux99) are active in the EL community. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How can I disable PostFix maillog ( /var/log/maillog )
On 12/18/2013 06:31 PM Peter wrote: > On 12/19/2013 12:33 AM, JEWEL AHMMED wrote: >> >> But, When my server handle a big file .. >> Maybe, It's use more Ram memory. >> so, what you thinking now ? :D > > I'm thinking that you have no idea what you're talking about and you're > trying to solve a non-issue. > > > Peter It's good to remember that we were all once new to linux, that some people whose first language isn't English face a much tougher challenge learning and speaking about it, and that we're all here for helping-- to receive help and to give help. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple-Scan
On Thu 19 Dec 2013 08:48:35 AM EST, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:22:25AM -0600, Joseph Hesse wrote: >> ... >> FYI: My Fujitsu scanner is not TWAIN compliant but it >> works with "simple-scan". > > It looks like Nux Desktop and LinuxTECH repos have it. Untested by me. > In the case of the Nux Desktop x86_64 one (LinuxTECH only has i686) Caveat: don't mix those two repos. Either one by itself works fine; mixed not so fine. I use both on a few machines, and both work well, individually. I had one machine with both; not a good idea. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Simple-Scan
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 07:22:25AM -0600, Joseph Hesse wrote: > Hi, > I just upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5. In 6.4 I had a scanner program > "simple-scan". I can't seem to get it for 6.5. I tried the elrepo and > forge repositories but they are not available there. I tried to rebuild > it from source but that didn't work. Any suggestions would be > appreciated. FYI: My Fujitsu scanner is not TWAIN compliant but it > works with "simple-scan". It looks like Nux Desktop and LinuxTECH repos have it. Untested by me. In the case of the Nux Desktop x86_64 one (LinuxTECH only has i686) http://pkgs.org/centos-6/nux-dextop-x86_64/simple-scan-2.32.0.2-1.el6.nux.x86_64.rpm.html -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Simple-Scan
Hi, I just upgraded from 6.4 to 6.5. In 6.4 I had a scanner program "simple-scan". I can't seem to get it for 6.5. I tried the elrepo and forge repositories but they are not available there. I tried to rebuild it from source but that didn't work. Any suggestions would be appreciated. FYI: My Fujitsu scanner is not TWAIN compliant but it works with "simple-scan". Thank you, Joe ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS, linux and kernel version
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Cliff Pratt wrote: > 3.9.3 is the kernel number. All Linux distributions use the Linux kernel, > so Debian version X and CentOS version Y may use the same kernel as may > Ubuntu version Z. There may be a list of CentOS versions and kernel numbers > somewhere, but I can't see that it would be of great interest. > CentOS 6.5 doesn't ship with a 3.x kernel. If it was a 2.6.32-something kernel then it would likely be an official kernel ... not a 3.x though. Possibly from elrepo or another third party repo. That's why this might be of interest to the OP. > > My Ubuntu 13.10 shows 3.11.0 so you have a fairly old Ubuntu version there. > In general the Ubuntu kernel will be newer than the more conservative > CentOS/RHEL. > Cheers > Cliff > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Jayadevan Maymala < > jayadevan.technol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am using CentOS 6.4. > > uname -r gives me > > > > 3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions - > > > > What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version numbers. > > > > Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the numbers like 3.9 and > > kernel versions maintained somewhere? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jayadevan > > ___ > > CentOS mailing list > > CentOS@centos.org > > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 106, Issue 11
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2013:C001 CentOS 5 firefox Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2013:1856 CentOS 6 libvirt Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CEBA-2013:C001 CentOS 6 firefox Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:38:53 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:C001 CentOS 5 firefox Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131218143853.ga10...@chakra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:C001
Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6850
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
69ea2073d271e4b8e9bb4cca244633e1a8402f591693f7463d5f05f38dad7a09
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
x86_64:
69ea2073d271e4b8e9bb4cca244633e1a8402f591693f7463d5f05f38dad7a09
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el5.centos.i386.rpm
8752daf842a7211d30f5659c14403ec47efa5cd264464d14d25d04c5c3818681
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el5.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
0a0c769cc50e5f3c6047d1293f8422c7608cb4e1dd6795852291e9948aa06ad9
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el5.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:06:27 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:1856 CentOS 6 libvirt Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131218140627.ga29...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:1856
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1856.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
488920f329f234c27ec7e3865c3aedc5370d3dd5ba37944b6bb545fcfb6fdde1
libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
b34e8d2233345736748be1117b847f6719d973d6170b689065c356818554ee3d
libvirt-client-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
fba0f8164f5ffc59eb2805e779db698ec2ee89c4f2e26826bd70aede2a46d490
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
f8eba9f7d04ccfc930cdaae2bc31f70194a9b4ec7778ab7d4e23777026f8fb50
libvirt-python-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
c8e9f2955cb51cc7bd9d37d75cfa0dc846a877a6cf2b33aabf09e02bf96aecee
libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
b34e8d2233345736748be1117b847f6719d973d6170b689065c356818554ee3d
libvirt-client-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
4ad9395728b924dd6310fbdb1fc80e04cfff0fd2436eef2b22de40817a9d98ec
libvirt-client-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
fba0f8164f5ffc59eb2805e779db698ec2ee89c4f2e26826bd70aede2a46d490
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.i686.rpm
94c40bc90d0aa1cce0d3a9f0224ea2b1edd75385799a2196b7f620d32b62d530
libvirt-devel-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
f9075f761f1483c1de29d82eca8ce33e984491e29372e000d1589a9af957c642
libvirt-lock-sanlock-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
649e578b285facb92e4b993283e7bcbd4b42d80a6cb6e5df6206ec196a8522d8
libvirt-python-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
852ece733b4bfa2de4c280f96b98e9e136a32f5c9b00a23c23943744ae070c25
libvirt-0.10.2-29.el6_5.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:37:50 +
From: Johnny Hughes
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2013:C001 CentOS 6 firefox Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20131218143750.ga30...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2013:C001
Upstream details at : http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6850
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
ba44d1947d4da34a5163c6c00b7795c8ea58e2ac3b0c8fe90d2eda9b8382
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
ba44d1947d4da34a5163c6c00b7795c8ea58e2ac3b0c8fe90d2eda9b8382
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
ec62fa4dec4087ab4ed84cb624d0f886ac6f018fb666c1bad98538b455048862
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
74868b0e7f866bac66e44ded2394912d6a1e311067c7ec53247a5c8f430534c4
firefox-24.2.0-1.0.1.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
___
CentOS-announce mai
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.5 -- Broadcom BCM4313 -- having trouble connecting
op 19-12-13 12:23, wwp schreef:
> Hello Johan,
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:08:17 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5.
>> ( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better
>> supported network card. )
>>
>> There on the latest kernel :
>>
>> root@jac network-scripts]# uname -a
>> Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13
>> 13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>>
>>
>> With the help of the Elrepo Broadcom page I got the driver and that part
>> works fine.
>> The network card works :
>>
>> # vi /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
>> # PCI device 0x14e4:0x4727 (wl)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="c0:14:3d:c1:f6:ef", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
>> NAME="eth1"
>>
>> # uname -a
>> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:14:3D:C1:F6:EF
>> inet6 addr: fe80::c214:3dff:fec1:f6ef/64 Scope:Link
>> UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>> RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:651
>> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>> collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>> RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>> Interrupt:17
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> But I cannot connect to any wireless network with neither of the machines.
>>
>> I click on the gnome-nm-applet and type in the password.
>>
>> [root@jac network-scripts]# tail -f /var/log/messages
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
>> 'scan_ssid' value '1'
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
>> 'key_mgmt' value 'WPA-PSK'
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'psk'
>> value ''
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'group'
>> value 'TKIP CCMP'
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) Stage
>> 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete.
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: set interface
>> ap_scan to 1
>> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: inactive -> scanning
>> Dec 19 11:10:18 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: scanning -> associating
>> Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: associating -> disconnected
>> Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: disconnected -> scanning
>> Dec 19 11:10:29 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: scanning -> associating
>> Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: associating -> disconnected
>> Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: disconnected -> scanning
>> Dec 19 11:10:40 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: scanning -> associating
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
>> (eth1/wireless): association took too long.
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
>> change: 5 -> 6 (reason 0)
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
>> (eth1/wireless): asking for new secrets
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
>> supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
>> "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
>> supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
>> "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
>> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
>> connection state: associating -> disconnected
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
>> change: 6 -> 9 (reason 7)
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1)
>> failed for access point (Clive)
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Marking connection
>> 'Auto Clive' invalid.
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) failed.
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
>> change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0)
>> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): deactivating
>> device (reason: 0).
>>
>> googling for "centos6 WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012" I
>> found this bug:
>>
>> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5834
>>
>>
>> could this be the same issue?
> Got the exact same problem after upgrading to CentOS 6.5, and I was not
> the only one. The archives of this ML would bring you help, check the
> thread I started:
>Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:26:19 +0100
>From: wwp
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: [CentOS] Upgrade to CentOS 6.5 -> issue with Broadcom Wifi
>
> As suggested by contributors here, and as written at
> http://elrepo.org/tiki/wl-kmod,
> I ended up installing the latest available driver by
Re: [CentOS] Centos6.5 -- Broadcom BCM4313 -- having trouble connecting
Hello Johan,
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:08:17 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5.
> ( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better
> supported network card. )
>
> There on the latest kernel :
>
> root@jac network-scripts]# uname -a
> Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13
> 13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
>
> With the help of the Elrepo Broadcom page I got the driver and that part
> works fine.
> The network card works :
>
> # vi /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> # PCI device 0x14e4:0x4727 (wl)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="c0:14:3d:c1:f6:ef", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
> NAME="eth1"
>
> # uname -a
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:14:3D:C1:F6:EF
>inet6 addr: fe80::c214:3dff:fec1:f6ef/64 Scope:Link
>UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
>RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:651
>TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>Interrupt:17
>
>
>
>
>
> But I cannot connect to any wireless network with neither of the machines.
>
> I click on the gnome-nm-applet and type in the password.
>
> [root@jac network-scripts]# tail -f /var/log/messages
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
> 'scan_ssid' value '1'
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
> 'key_mgmt' value 'WPA-PSK'
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'psk'
> value ''
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'group'
> value 'TKIP CCMP'
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) Stage
> 2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete.
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: set interface
> ap_scan to 1
> Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: inactive -> scanning
> Dec 19 11:10:18 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: scanning -> associating
> Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: associating -> disconnected
> Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: disconnected -> scanning
> Dec 19 11:10:29 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: scanning -> associating
> Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: associating -> disconnected
> Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: disconnected -> scanning
> Dec 19 11:10:40 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: scanning -> associating
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
> (eth1/wireless): association took too long.
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
> change: 5 -> 6 (reason 0)
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
> (eth1/wireless): asking for new secrets
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
> supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
> "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
> supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
> "fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
> Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
> connection state: associating -> disconnected
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
> change: 6 -> 9 (reason 7)
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1)
> failed for access point (Clive)
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Marking connection
> 'Auto Clive' invalid.
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) failed.
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
> change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0)
> Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): deactivating
> device (reason: 0).
>
> googling for "centos6 WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012" I
> found this bug:
>
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5834
>
>
> could this be the same issue?
Got the exact same problem after upgrading to CentOS 6.5, and I was not
the only one. The archives of this ML would bring you help, check the
thread I started:
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 10:26:19 +0100
From: wwp
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Upgrade to CentOS 6.5 -> issue with Broadcom Wifi
As suggested by contributors here, and as written at
http://elrepo.org/tiki/wl-kmod,
I ended up installing the latest available driver by building the RPM
from the archive of the sources. The procedure is described at the link
above.
Regards,
--
wwp
signatu
[CentOS] Centos6.5 -- Broadcom BCM4313 -- having trouble connecting
Dear All,
I'm having trouble on 2 laptops Lenovo B580 since upgrading to Centos6.5.
( Because it's a Lenovo I cannot switch the network card for a better
supported network card. )
There on the latest kernel :
root@jac network-scripts]# uname -a
Linux jac.cawdekempen 2.6.32-431.1.2.0.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 13
13:06:13 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
With the help of the Elrepo Broadcom page I got the driver and that part
works fine.
The network card works :
# vi /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# PCI device 0x14e4:0x4727 (wl)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="c0:14:3d:c1:f6:ef", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*",
NAME="eth1"
# uname -a
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr C0:14:3D:C1:F6:EF
inet6 addr: fe80::c214:3dff:fec1:f6ef/64 Scope:Link
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:651
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
Interrupt:17
But I cannot connect to any wireless network with neither of the machines.
I click on the gnome-nm-applet and type in the password.
[root@jac network-scripts]# tail -f /var/log/messages
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
'scan_ssid' value '1'
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added
'key_mgmt' value 'WPA-PSK'
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'psk'
value ''
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: added 'group'
value 'TKIP CCMP'
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) Stage
2 of 5 (Device Configure) complete.
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Config: set interface
ap_scan to 1
Dec 19 11:10:17 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: inactive -> scanning
Dec 19 11:10:18 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: scanning -> associating
Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: associating -> disconnected
Dec 19 11:10:28 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: disconnected -> scanning
Dec 19 11:10:29 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: scanning -> associating
Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: associating -> disconnected
Dec 19 11:10:39 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: disconnected -> scanning
Dec 19 11:10:40 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: scanning -> associating
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
(eth1/wireless): association took too long.
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
change: 5 -> 6 (reason 0)
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation
(eth1/wireless): asking for new secrets
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
"fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Couldn't disconnect
supplicant interface: Method "Disconnect" with signature "" on interface
"fi.epitest.hostap.WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012.
Dec 19 11:10:42 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): supplicant
connection state: associating -> disconnected
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
change: 6 -> 9 (reason 7)
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1)
failed for access point (Clive)
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Marking connection
'Auto Clive' invalid.
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: Activation (eth1) failed.
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): device state
change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0)
Dec 19 11:10:43 jac NetworkManager[2148]: (eth1): deactivating
device (reason: 0).
googling for "centos6 WPASupplicant.Interface" doesn't exist#012" I
found this bug:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5834
could this be the same issue?
Greetings, J.
--
Johan Vermeulen
IT-medewerker
Caw De Kempen
johan.vermeu...@cawdekempen.be
0479.82.01.41
Opensource Software is the future.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " ?
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 09:45:26 + Norah Jones wrote: > Hi, > > Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root > " in CentOs? > > My queries are the following - > 1. Why this is generated ? > 2. How to disable this ? > 3. Is this system generated ? > 4. Is this message gain any importance ? > > > > Thanks, > Norah Jones > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi, Basically, this is just a "You've got mail" notification. Most likely these are system generated logs or errors being mailed to root. When logged into root type "mail" to see them. Importance wise, it depends on what you perceive as important. I myself like to know what is going on with my system so I leave them on, while others do not. Disabling them would involve either, disabling postfix all together (or any other mailserver), this would prevent all system mail. Or, if you are using this as an email server, disabling other things such as logwatch, and any other script which may mail root, Lastly another option is creating a dumby user for all mail directed at root to go by setting up aliases in /etc/aliases (Basically at end: root: dumbyuser) and then running newaliases. Hope this helps :-). Regards, Jake Shipton (JakeMS) GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " ?
Hi, Why I get this message " You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root " in CentOs? My queries are the following - 1. Why this is generated ? 2. How to disable this ? 3. Is this system generated ? 4. Is this message gain any importance ? Thanks, Norah Jones ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS, linux and kernel version
3.9.3 is the kernel number. All Linux distributions use the Linux kernel, so Debian version X and CentOS version Y may use the same kernel as may Ubuntu version Z. There may be a list of CentOS versions and kernel numbers somewhere, but I can't see that it would be of great interest. My Ubuntu 13.10 shows 3.11.0 so you have a fairly old Ubuntu version there. In general the Ubuntu kernel will be newer than the more conservative CentOS/RHEL. Cheers Cliff On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Jayadevan Maymala < jayadevan.technol...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am using CentOS 6.4. > uname -r gives me > > 3.9.3-x86_64 Kernel version is 2.6.32. My questions - > > What is 3.9? In Ubuntu, uname -r and /boot give the same version numbers. > > Do we have a mapping of CentOS versions, the numbers like 3.9 and > kernel versions maintained somewhere? > > > Regards, > > Jayadevan > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
