[CentOS] chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6

2014-04-04 Thread ngeorgop
*New version of chromium (33.0.1750.152)*Build by me :-)i686
chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.i686.rpm
  SRPM
chromium-33.0.1750.152-3.el6.src.rpm
   



--
View this message in context: 
http://centos.1050465.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-chromium-33-0-1750-152-3-el6-tp5725772.html
Sent from the CentOS mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:


Paul,

  One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what 
version of trac is your package at?


I'll reiterate that I don't now use nor have I ever used the Agilo 
plugin. We've got five servers running Trac:


 * two run trac-0.12-2.centos6 (dag/rf)
 * three run trac-0.12.5-1.el6 (epel)

--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
Paul,

   One big question, before I try to file a bug against EPEL: what version
of trac is your package at?

   Yeah, I realize that you probably set it up under an older version that
didn't have this bug, but

   My latest trick (and I've been googling for days now) was to run
trac-admin /path/to/proj, then, in interactive, component list... and
though I've got the agilo stuff in /path/to/proj/conf/trac.ini, and
enabled, it showed only component1  somebody
component2  somebody
 Then I added agilo... still nothing.

   But it *really* bothers me that when I mouse over admin up at the upper
right, what I see is https:///trac/PLT/cgi-bin/undefined. I've
just added /.../site-packages/trac to the SetEnv and reloaded, but
nothing

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

A possibly related question: as I said, I installed via yum 
trac-agilo-plugin. In /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ I see both 
agilo and agilo-0.9.7-py2.6.egg-info. In the SetEnv in my apache 
config *what* do I put in? I see, by running python from the command 
line, that I should add specific directories under site-packages... 
but do which do I add, agilo, or the egg-info of it?


I don't think you'll need any additions to SetEnv. I take it 
you've configured trac.ini per


  https://dev.agile42.com/wiki/TracIni

There are a boatload of non-standard [sections] with configuration 
directives specific to the Agilo plugin.


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
Paul Heinlein wrote:
>On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

>> I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as
>> though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the
>> existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be
>> ".../trac.cgi/undefined".

> Haven't seen that bit of fun. Is there an Apache log message that
> corresponds to it?

Nope.

A possibly related question: as I said, I installed via yum
trac-agilo-plugin. In
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ I see both agilo and
agilo-0.9.7-py2.6.egg-info. In the SetEnv in my apache config *what* do I
put in? I see, by running python from the command line, that I should add
specific directories under site-packages... but do which do I add, agilo,
or the egg-info of it?

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-04 Thread SilverTip257
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Johan Vermeulen
wrote:

> op 04-04-14 03:01, Always Learning schreef:
> > On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote:
>  >
> > Children, and indeed people, develop at different ages.  I think what is
> > needed is something like, for example,
> >
> >> * what is a computer
> >> * the basis and basics of Linux
> >> * Centos simply
> > If a four year old can ask why is the sky blue, and then a 10 year old
> > already familiar with IPv4 wants to know how he can make a simple web
> > page, Sugar is not the answer.
>

Depends on the age group, as you've pointed out.


>  >
> > Lets give the children something really great, awesome, interesting and
> > thought provoking.
> >
> >
> Hello,
>
> I now see that there is a Fedora edu spin in-the-making.
>
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Education


It is better to support Fedora than to "reinvent the wheel" with an
identical/similar CentOS spin.
The software selection is larger with Fedora than with CentOS.

I would suggest it is best to look at what Fedora is currently doing or
even planning on doing.  See if there's something better or vastly
different that CentOS can offer.


>
>
> I can understand why this list is not too warm with the idea of Centos
> for children.
> A lot of people on the list are trained professionals who are
> responsible for critical systems.
>

Yep.


> No doubt everyone would gladly promote Centos, but probably and
> understandably, most are short on free time.
>
> No reason to reïnvent the wheel . Let's find out how the Fedora project
> is doing.
>

+1


-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //


On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 4:48 AM, Johan Vermeulen
wrote:

>
> op 04-04-14 03:01, Always Learning schreef:
> > On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote:
> >
> >> There is this
> >>
> >> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar
> >>
> >> based on fedora, for younger children.
> > Thanks Dave.
> >
> > But, looking at the initial web page, this is NOT what I believe is
> > required.
> >
> > For example, on
> >
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Creating_an_Activity#Overview_of_unique_hardware_environment
> >
> > --
> >
> > "When you have at least ten lines of code
> >
> > At this point you are ready to host your code in a repository so that
> > other developers can look at it. You should also create trac tickets to
> > track bugs and feature requests. One of the main OLPC communication
> > systems is through the dev.laptop.org trac page where people can see the
> > status of activities as releases are prepared, testers can file bug
> > reports, and translators can submit translations of your activity. You
> > need to do three things to set this system up:
> >
> >   1. Request project hosting: You need to fill out an application and
> >  send it to the devel list (another good reason to join).
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > That does not seem to be directed at children, curious children and
> > children with a desire for inspirational news and information.
> >
> > Might be OK for them grown-ups. Not so great for CHILDREN.
> >
> > If the children already know about IP addresses, have some concept of
> > servers and clients and want to play with making a web site (basic HTML
> > followed with some CSS), then Sugar is way-off the mark as the Americans
> > say.
> >
> > Children, and indeed people, develop at different ages.  I think what is
> > needed is something like, for example,
> >
> >> * what is a computer
> >> * the basis and basics of Linux
> >> * Centos simply
> > If a four year old can ask why is the sky blue, and then a 10 year old
> > already familiar with IPv4 wants to know how he can make a simple web
> > page, Sugar is not the answer.
> >
> > Lets give the children something really great, awesome, interesting and
> > thought provoking.
> >
> >
> Hello,
>
> I now see that there is a Fedora edu spin in-the-making.
>
>http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Education
>
> I can understand why this list is not too warm with the idea of Centos
> for children.
> A lot of people on the list are trained professionals who are
> responsible for critical systems.
> No doubt everyone would gladly promote Centos, but probably and
> understandably, most are short on free time.
>
> No reason to reïnvent the wheel . Let's find out how the Fedora project
> is doing.
>
> Friendly regards, J.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread Paul Heinlein

On Fri, 4 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as 
though there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the 
existing admin (in small print at the right top) shouldn't be 
".../trac.cgi/undefined".


Haven't seen that bit of fun. Is there an Apache log message that 
corresponds to it?


--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6' W___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread m . roth
mark wrote>
> On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the
>>> information shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why
admin is
>>> undefined?
>>>
>>> All of this is from the quick-start for agilo, where it says to go to
>>> admin, and create a team, and I can't find any way to do that, with
this stuff
>>> apparently missing
>>>
>>> Note that all I did was the yum install, and the editing the trac.ini.
>>> Note  also that there's nothing in /path/to/proj/plugins Do I
actually
>>> need to use easy_install to do some of this stuff?
>>
>> You made yourself TRAC_ADMIN, right?
>>
>>trac-admin /path/to/trac permission add m.roth TRAC_ADMIN
>>
>> using whatever path and username are appropriate.

Yup, sure did. I'm looking at history now.

I'm not sure if the issue is just the agilo plugin or not. Seems as though
there *ought* to be an admin icon, or at least that the existing admin (in
small print at the right top) shouldn't be ".../trac.cgi/undefined".

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] trac, agilo plugin, rpm, aughghgh!!!

2014-04-04 Thread mark
On 04/03/14 18:21, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Apr 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> On the other hand - any advice? Clues as to why this icon (the information
>> shows it as a round bullet) isn't on the toolbar, or why admin is undefined?
>>
>> All of this is from the quick-start for agilo, where it says to go to admin,
>> and create a team, and I can't find any way to do that, with this stuff
>> apparently missing
>>
>> Note that all I did was the yum install, and the editing the trac.ini. Note
>> also that there's nothing in /path/to/proj/plugins Do I actually need to
>> use easy_install to do some of this stuff?
>
> You made yourself TRAC_ADMIN, right?
>
>trac-admin /path/to/trac permission add m.roth TRAC_ADMIN
>
> using whatever path and username are appropriate.
>
> Otherwise, I have exactly zero experience with anything related to agilo.

Hmmm... I'm pretty sure I did, but I'll check when I get into work.

mark

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 110, Issue 3

2014-04-04 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CEBA-2014:0356 CentOS 6 rrdtool FASTTRACK Update (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CEBA-2014:0360  CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Update (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2014:0359  CentOS 6 krb5 Update (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CEBA-2014:0361  CentOS 5 xorg-x11-server Update (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CESA-2014:0370 Moderate CentOS 6 httpd Update (Johnny Hughes)
   6. CESA-2014:0369 Moderate CentOS 5 httpd Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:22:45 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0356 CentOS 6 rrdtool FASTTRACK
Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20140403172245.ga2...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0356 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0356.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
7fb765a31da9410aedb81de9973ea1e8806237908c4cf3bd0855c98c2bf63179  
rrdtool-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
fc0368f9cd4f1c287c6ea6b3ebba86b38338c1c0aa332f7684a5334afc93e091  
rrdtool-devel-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
2f6459eb2423cd8e9ca4ecc1061b675ad72f8d39968297675eb8a7889cdbd8b4  
rrdtool-doc-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
06c7975f329b07715db3b37e633aa6e5d662e822c26f154a602122058d8295f0  
rrdtool-perl-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
36dcf736bb8ec25df9de8ae52f1c888e9c88e571f498507821b18ebd630a1b8a  
rrdtool-php-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
6a4ae767524bc7608fcf900297fbe389bd595b1c86ab2b3874135f207b8a6180  
rrdtool-python-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
b76d75660791f57325c0d53840f58aac645ae7891fca9207c8423da2e3ef3105  
rrdtool-ruby-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
a680a12c7e994cc718f78f9227ded0bed602f5f8456a009f246096dd4513b6a8  
rrdtool-tcl-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
7fb765a31da9410aedb81de9973ea1e8806237908c4cf3bd0855c98c2bf63179  
rrdtool-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
297b504b9144a709a92cc044fa2d53912b4dae34bc8d726d1a81302c30a073e3  
rrdtool-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
fc0368f9cd4f1c287c6ea6b3ebba86b38338c1c0aa332f7684a5334afc93e091  
rrdtool-devel-1.3.8-7.el6.i686.rpm
1f9019625a69ce4a1d54e5339301988dd8d83e0fa28eec5716d4e35d31948361  
rrdtool-devel-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
b61f7467b297ce9f168679eb8c656cac7f09d76992a61c4082c725c0c85b163b  
rrdtool-doc-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
fbd22efa04f019d89bf01273b83fcc22538ab3138ebe3710ed4bf5658fe68aea  
rrdtool-perl-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
40e1d711ed340690ac60607a89d9f98b120a6b9ad030cdc82497efb8c1bf5900  
rrdtool-php-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
a4bc3e0c17cc27ce6cee6b2fff4c715d4b0001313ccd2502c60f7791f1c0e228  
rrdtool-python-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
366696429ebfd82564972ad099aabcebdb6b70333d6516531b7b990ca7def0e3  
rrdtool-ruby-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
d7ace7ac32e2d1666ea0aa167506de14158f82007460211f83236b52a7646140  
rrdtool-tcl-1.3.8-7.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
3035752b874a1185274dd4f55b9570135d0e239053c1ee604b8f0e732abebdda  
rrdtool-1.3.8-7.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:24:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2014:0360  CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Update
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Message-ID: <20140403172441.ga2...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0360 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0360.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
a0ab89bbbec043d07fd801a19493c67aab38f0ccbd98fe1f0bd678661bc65317  
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.i686.rpm

x86_64:
814d961600f7ebe8789786c802dffc9c9e2b87d2c1cde99071adabe89f982849  
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.x86_64.rpm
8e63833e9d8f0594d3294990fbd2f33209bd2d57d7c8b0e6930c50af2f350a48  
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.x86_64.rpm
e3b410a23a2b0c5f6d23c97c4febebd9d2df09fb493285680f09834736ae16eb  
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.x86_64.rpm
fc573fbe7ecbdb5107e69c73b47aa48e64615692e75e6b872013faf0c854ba78  
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.x86_64.rpm

Source:
f8c440d48ecc80a6a095869aebc8b31443eab67a2e2a9b4f7d05c10f15ce8d47  
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.7.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 17:24:57 +
From:

Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-04 Thread David Beveridge
I have been considering doing a basic intro to computing course along
these lines aimed at 8-12yo kids.
The school where my kids go have XO machines that run Sugar Desktop
for the little kids and gnome for the older kids.
We just upgraded all the XO machines to something based on Fedora18. (from 17)

That school has a lot of Window PCs and tablets, but the XOs outnumber the PCs.
A Typical class will have 20-25 XO (1 per child) and maybe 5 PC and 5 tablet.
The computers are really there as a tool to teach them reading, maths,
science etc not really for them to learn about computing.

I was hoping to introduce them to some of the fundamentals of
computing and let them make up their own minds.

I don't think you can just jump into CentOS or any other operating
system and truly understand how it works without some background.

I started to write down some topics I might teach at a lunchtime computer club.
The idea is to give a basic introduction, so they have heard of the
terms and can go look up more things in Wikipedia or Google.

Of course I would use the Linux based XO laptops for any practical
hands on stuff.

COMPUTER BASICS AND INTRO TO HARDWARE
Input, Store/Process, Output
Binary, Hexadecimal, ASCII, UCS2, GB2312, UTF8
CPU, Intel, AMD, ARM
Memory, RAM, ROM, Flash
Hard Disk, SSD, SATA, SAS
Removable Media, USB, SDCARD
Power Supplies, UPS


INTERNETWORKING
Ethernet, Packets
Network layers - Physical, Link, Network, Session, Presentation, Application
WiFi, PPP, DSL (Link)
TCP/IP, DHCP, NAT (Network) [mention IPv4 & IPv6]
Domains and DNS, Email
HTTP, FTP, SSH, SIP (Session)
Google, Apple, Microsoft, Linux (Presentation, Application)


OPERATING SYSTEMS
Microsoft Windows & Metro
Apple OSX & IOS
Google Android
Linux, Fedora/RHEL/CentOS, Ubuntu/Debian, Mint,
FreeBSD, OpenBSD


LICENSING AND OTHER LEGAL STUFF
GNU, Free, OpenSource
Shareware
Proprietary software (EULA) - Payware
Software patents


PROGRAMMING FUNDAMENTALS
Hello World
Assignment, Operators
Flow Control
Looping
Events
Classes

PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE TYPES
Assembler
Compiled
Interpreted
Template
4GL


DATABASES
Row, Column, Key
Create, Update, Retrieve, Delete
Relationships
SQL


AUDIO VISUAL DATA FORMATS
A: mp3, ac3
V: jpeg, png, gif, svg
S: sub
AV: mpeg, divx, xvid, mp4, avi
AVS: mkv


WHAT ARE APPLICATIONS AND WHAT DO THEY DO
Word Processing
Spreadsheet
Presentation
Photo Editing
Accounting


OTHER IDEAS
Gibibytes vs Gigabytes
OpenGL vs DirectX


THE NEXT YEAR
Arduino Projects


If anyone see's any gaping holes please point them out.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos for Interested Children

2014-04-04 Thread Johan Vermeulen

op 04-04-14 03:01, Always Learning schreef:
> On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 10:09 +1000, David Beveridge wrote:
>
>> There is this
>>
>> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Sugar
>>
>> based on fedora, for younger children.
> Thanks Dave.
>
> But, looking at the initial web page, this is NOT what I believe is
> required.
>
> For example, on
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Creating_an_Activity#Overview_of_unique_hardware_environment
>
> --
>
> "When you have at least ten lines of code
>
> At this point you are ready to host your code in a repository so that
> other developers can look at it. You should also create trac tickets to
> track bugs and feature requests. One of the main OLPC communication
> systems is through the dev.laptop.org trac page where people can see the
> status of activities as releases are prepared, testers can file bug
> reports, and translators can submit translations of your activity. You
> need to do three things to set this system up:
>
>   1. Request project hosting: You need to fill out an application and
>  send it to the devel list (another good reason to join).
>
>
> --
>
>
> That does not seem to be directed at children, curious children and
> children with a desire for inspirational news and information.
>
> Might be OK for them grown-ups. Not so great for CHILDREN.
>
> If the children already know about IP addresses, have some concept of
> servers and clients and want to play with making a web site (basic HTML
> followed with some CSS), then Sugar is way-off the mark as the Americans
> say.
>
> Children, and indeed people, develop at different ages.  I think what is
> needed is something like, for example,
>
>> * what is a computer
>> * the basis and basics of Linux
>> * Centos simply
> If a four year old can ask why is the sky blue, and then a 10 year old
> already familiar with IPv4 wants to know how he can make a simple web
> page, Sugar is not the answer.
>
> Lets give the children something really great, awesome, interesting and
> thought provoking.
>
>
Hello,

I now see that there is a Fedora edu spin in-the-making.

   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Education

I can understand why this list is not too warm with the idea of Centos 
for children.
A lot of people on the list are trained professionals who are 
responsible for critical systems.
No doubt everyone would gladly promote Centos, but probably and 
understandably, most are short on free time.

No reason to reïnvent the wheel . Let's find out how the Fedora project 
is doing.

Friendly regards, J.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos