Re: [CentOS] mairadb doesn't prompt for user/pass

2014-08-31 Thread Eero Volotinen
2014-08-31 6:12 GMT+03:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com:

 Hello,

  I discovered today that CentOS 7 has replaced MySQL with MariaDB. Which is
 fine, it's seems really similar. And I was already aware that it was
 written by the original team that wrote mysql.

 It's cool that the mysql command still gets you in!

 This is the version I have:

 [root@web1:~] #mysql --version
 mysql  Ver 15.1 Distrib 5.5.37-MariaDB, for Linux (x86_64) using readline
 5.1

 But for some reason all I have to do is type the word 'mysql' to get me
 into the database.

 That's ok for initial setup I guess. But once I was in a did away with all
 the accounts that either had blank set for the username, and updated all
 the accounts to use passwords.

 MariaDB [mysql] select User,'@',Host,Password from user;
 +---+---+---+---+

 | User  | @ | Host  | Password  |

 +---+---+---+---+

 | root  | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | root  | @ | web1  | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | root  | @ | 127.0.0.1 | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | admin | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 +---+---+---+---+

 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 I also did a search from root to find any my.cnf files and didn't find any
 that has user accounts in them.

 Also I find that for the root accounts I can't seem to login even if I set
 the password in the database without encryption and copy/paste the password
 into the prompt.

 However the non-root account (admin) does let you in with the password.

 So I'm wondering how to secure mariadb so that it doesnt' let you in
 without typing in a username and password and also why it doesn't let you
 log in as 'root'? Is the root account disallowed from logging in by
 default?


you need to run
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/mysql-secure-installation.html
(mysql_secure_installation) command from commandline

--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] why does centos 7 want to install mariadb instead of mysql ?

2014-08-31 Thread Jim Perrin


On 08/30/2014 01:10 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
 Hey all,
 
 I just got around to trying out CentOS 7. And for some reason when I
 attempt to install mysql-server, instead I'm offered mariadb? I'm using
 epel and remi as my repos.


The short answer is because RH chose to use mariadb instead of MySQL in
EL7. As others have said, this is similar to the openoffice-libreoffice
switch. There should be very minimal (if any at all) difference in
functionality.

-- 
Jim Perrin
The CentOS Project | http://www.centos.org
twitter: @BitIntegrity | GPG Key: FA09AD77
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Hi guys, sorry for this newbie question but how I do add EPEL repo to my
CentOS 7? In the past I do this as follow:

$ sudo rpm -Uvh
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm

But now I don't know how to? Any help?


On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Keith Keller 
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:

 On 2014-08-30, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
 
  On Fri, August 29, 2014 3:21 pm, Karanbir Singh wrote:
   EPEL-7 is now considered GA
 
  Just to add everybody some loughs: State of Georgia was as far as I came
  about GA without your help ;-)

 I think it'd be great if EPEL took over Georgia!  :)

 --keith


 --
 kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread Digimer
This is the most you would need to do:

yum clean all

 From then on, all the packages in EPEL will be available for you to 
install just like the core packages are.

Cheers

digimer

On 31/08/14 12:56 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi guys, sorry for this newbie question but how I do add EPEL repo to my
 CentOS 7? In the past I do this as follow:

 $ sudo rpm -Uvh
 http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm

 But now I don't know how to? Any help?


 On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Keith Keller 
 kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote:

 On 2014-08-30, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:

 On Fri, August 29, 2014 3:21 pm, Karanbir Singh wrote:
 EPEL-7 is now considered GA

 Just to add everybody some loughs: State of Georgia was as far as I came
 about GA without your help ;-)

 I think it'd be great if EPEL took over Georgia!  :)

 --keith


 --
 kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Hi there, I'm playing with CentOS 7 (don't know if it's recommended at all
have this one as a development server as maybe is not stable enough yet)
and I installed it on a Vmware VM with two network interfaces: one as a
bridged connected directly to the physical network and replicating the
network state and the second one as a host only interface (the one I use to
manage the VM) so after I got the CentOS installed I can see the first
interface but not the second one and I don't know how to enable it. If I
run the command ifconfig -a this is what I see:

eno1628: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe2e:e245  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20link
ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 126  bytes 17122 (16.7 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 83  bytes 12627 (12.3 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

lo: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10host
loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

What I need to do in order to enable the other interface? Also how I change
the name eno1628 to eth0-internet without get down my server?

Thanks in advace
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:

 This is the most you would need to do:

 yum clean all


You mean run only this command or run first the command sudo rpm -Uvh
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
and then yum clean all? I try the command sudo rpm -Uvh
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
and I got error since file doesn't exists curl: (22) The requested URL
returned error: 404 Not Found so what other thing I should try?

Cheers and thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread Digimer
On 31/08/14 02:18 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:

 This is the most you would need to do:

 yum clean all


 You mean run only this command or run first the command sudo rpm -Uvh
 http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
 and then yum clean all? I try the command sudo rpm -Uvh
 http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
 and I got error since file doesn't exists curl: (22) The requested URL
 returned error: 404 Not Found so what other thing I should try?

 Cheers and thanks

That is the beta URL (epel/beta/7), you need to full release RPM:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#What_packages_and_versions_are_available_in_EPEL.3F

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread Digimer
On 31/08/14 02:15 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi there, I'm playing with CentOS 7 (don't know if it's recommended at all
 have this one as a development server as maybe is not stable enough yet)

This is something of a loaded question and also quite dependent on what 
you are doing. If the server is very critical, I would probably wait 
until 7.1 or 7.2. If the server is not very critical, then sure, use EL7 
and start learning it (and report bugs! :) ).

 and I installed it on a Vmware VM with two network interfaces: one as a
 bridged connected directly to the physical network and replicating the
 network state and the second one as a host only interface (the one I use to
 manage the VM) so after I got the CentOS installed I can see the first
 interface but not the second one and I don't know how to enable it. If I
 run the command ifconfig -a this is what I see:

 eno1628: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
  inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
  inet6 fe80::250:56ff:fe2e:e245  prefixlen 64  scopeid 0x20link
  ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
  RX packets 126  bytes 17122 (16.7 KiB)
  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
  TX packets 83  bytes 12627 (12.3 KiB)
  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

 lo: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
  inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
  inet6 ::1  prefixlen 128  scopeid 0x10host
  loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
  RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
  TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

If 'ifconfig -a' doesn't see it, the kernel probably doesn't, either. Do 
you see it in lspci or dmidecode? If not, I would look at the hypervisor 
for a problem.

 What I need to do in order to enable the other interface? Also how I change
 the name eno1628 to eth0-internet without get down my server?

 Thanks in advace

Yes you can do it without rebooting, but it still requires taking the 
network down.

I wrote this a while ago:

https://alteeve.ca/w/Changing_Ethernet_Device_Names_in_EL7_and_Fedora_15%2B

It probably needs to be updated/cleaned up, but it should be good enough 
to help you.

digimer

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Thanks, I get it and now it's working


On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:

 On 31/08/14 02:18 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
 
  This is the most you would need to do:
 
  yum clean all
 
 
  You mean run only this command or run first the command sudo rpm -Uvh
 
 http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
  and then yum clean all? I try the command sudo rpm -Uvh
 
 http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/beta/7/x86_64/epel-release-7-0.2.noarch.rpm
  and I got error since file doesn't exists curl: (22) The requested URL
  returned error: 404 Not Found so what other thing I should try?
 
  Cheers and thanks

 That is the beta URL (epel/beta/7), you need to full release RPM:


 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL#What_packages_and_versions_are_available_in_EPEL.3F

 --
 Digimer
 Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
 What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without
 access to education?
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] EPEL-7 is Released

2014-08-31 Thread Timothy Murphy
Digimer wrote:

 This is the most you would need to do:
 
 yum clean all
 
  From then on, all the packages in EPEL will be available for you to
 install just like the core packages are.

Don't you have to yum install epel-release?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:

 i don't see you VMware configuration in your post


Which configuration you need? The one I made at Windows side? The Vmware is
running on Windows 7 (I didn't send here since I don't know if I can attach
images to this list and to not be banned so I omit then)


 you need to use the vmxnet3 ethernet interface for the VM
 that module is part of the Linux upstream Kernel for a long time

 that below is straight out-of-box on REHL7
 the open-vm-tools now are only the user-space daemon
 the times where you need to compile kernel modules are gone 2013

 [root@localhost:~]$ lsmod | grep vm
 vmw_balloon13415  0
 vmxnet349541  0
 vmw_vmci   67106  0
 vmw_pvscsi 22858  4


What about if I didn't see vmxnet3?

[root@webserver ~]# lsmod | grep vm
vmw_balloon13415  0
vmw_vmci   67106  0
vmwgfx135143  1
ttm83948  1 vmwgfx
drm   297829  2 ttm,vmwgfx
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:

 This is something of a loaded question and also quite dependent on what
 you are doing. If the server is very critical, I would probably wait
 until 7.1 or 7.2. If the server is not very critical, then sure, use EL7
 and start learning it (and report bugs! :) ).


It's not critical, just a development server I'll like to configure in
order to start learn a bit CentOS 7 (I'm not a System Administrator expert
but a developer)


 If 'ifconfig -a' doesn't see it, the kernel probably doesn't, either. Do
 you see it in lspci or dmidecode? If not, I would look at the hypervisor
 for a problem.


As I said above I'm not a expert but I did man dmidecode since lspci
isn't available and I can't find a TYPE for see network interfaces also I
do not know if the output is related to motherboard (the one I have) or is
related to emulated board (if this has sense), so what command should I run
to give you proper info?



 Yes you can do it without rebooting, but it still requires taking the
 network down.

 I wrote this a while ago:

 https://alteeve.ca/w/Changing_Ethernet_Device_Names_in_EL7_and_Fedora_15%2B

 It probably needs to be updated/cleaned up, but it should be good enough
 to help you.


I'll take a look in a few minutes after system updates complete
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:

 ook what adapter type you have configured for your virtual machine
 maybe the GUI don't show it - it's even on vSphere a pain where you
 need to remove the NIC and add it again by take care of the type

 * in doubt shut down the guest
 * close VMware
 * open the .vxm file

 ethernet0.virtualDev = vmxnet3

 depens if that ethernet0.virtualDev exists
 if yes - change it to vmxnet3
 if not add it somewhere around the other ethernet settings



This is what I have in .vxm file:

ethernet0.present = TRUE
ethernet0.virtualDev = e1000
ethernet0.wakeOnPcktRcv = FALSE
ethernet0.addressType = static
ethernet0.address = 00:50:56:2E:E2:45
ethernet0.linkStatePropagation.enable = TRUE
ethernet1.present = TRUE
ethernet1.vnet = VMnet1
ethernet1.connectionType = custom
ethernet1.wakeOnPcktRcv = FALSE
ethernet1.addressType = static
ethernet1.address = 00:50:56:3F:86:30

And this is how I configured the network interface at Vmware
http://imgur.com/GSX9N6c the weird part here is the same network
configuration works fine in a CentOS 6.5 VM
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread Digimer
On 31/08/14 02:39 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:

 This is something of a loaded question and also quite dependent on what
 you are doing. If the server is very critical, I would probably wait
 until 7.1 or 7.2. If the server is not very critical, then sure, use EL7
 and start learning it (and report bugs! :) ).


 It's not critical, just a development server I'll like to configure in
 order to start learn a bit CentOS 7 (I'm not a System Administrator expert
 but a developer)


 If 'ifconfig -a' doesn't see it, the kernel probably doesn't, either. Do
 you see it in lspci or dmidecode? If not, I would look at the hypervisor
 for a problem.


 As I said above I'm not a expert but I did man dmidecode since lspci
 isn't available and I can't find a TYPE for see network interfaces also I
 do not know if the output is related to motherboard (the one I have) or is
 related to emulated board (if this has sense), so what command should I run
 to give you proper info?

No worries about not being an admin.

To find a package that provides a certain tool, you can do this:

[root@rhel7-builder ~]# yum provides */lspci
Loaded plugins: product-id, subscription-manager
Repodata is over 2 weeks old. Install yum-cron? Or run: yum makecache fast
rhel-7-server-rpms/7Server/x86_64/filelists_db 
 
 
| 3.7 MB  00:00:01
rhel-ha-for-rhel-7-server-rpms/7Server/x86_64/filelists_db 
 
 
|  50 kB  00:00:00
rhel-rs-for-rhel-7-server-rpms/7Server/x86_64/filelists_db 
 
 
|  55 kB  00:00:00
rhel-sap-for-rhel-7-server-rpms/7Server/x86_64/filelists_db 
 
 
| 3.7 kB  00:00:00
pciutils-3.2.1-4.el7.x86_64 : PCI bus related utilities
Repo: rhel-7-server-rpms
Matched from:
Filename: /usr/sbin/lspci

This shows that you can get 'lspci' by installing the 'pciutils' program.

As for hardware, from inside the VM, only the emulated hardware can be 
seen, not the real hardware. So lspci, dmidecode and similar tools will 
report on the (virtual) hardware created by VMWare.

Sorry, but I can't provide any advice for VMWare, I use KVM.

 Yes you can do it without rebooting, but it still requires taking the
 network down.

 I wrote this a while ago:

 https://alteeve.ca/w/Changing_Ethernet_Device_Names_in_EL7_and_Fedora_15%2B

 It probably needs to be updated/cleaned up, but it should be good enough
 to help you.


 I'll take a look in a few minutes after system updates complete

Let me know if you have trouble.

Cheers!

-- 
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a person without 
access to education?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS7 Minimal installation on Vmware missing network interface

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:

 ethernet0.virtualDev = e1000
 ethernet0.virtualDev = vmxnet3



Thanks now with the solution you give me I'm able to see the network
interface and yes I learn something new today so thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and a SSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
I have a fleet of 2970s and we are upgrading the hardrives on the motherboard 
SATA ports (A/B not the PERC backplane) when a detecting hardware is 
performed the system crashes, reboots and gives an E1422 error code (useless 
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhyMeUHJar4).

We narrowed it down to a motherboard BIOS issue, if we remove the SSD or add 
noprobe to the kernel the installer does not crash. 

But when specifing noprobe it does not appear to have the loopback driver 
(and likely many more).

ERROR: failed to mount loopback device /dev/loop0 on /mnt/runtime as 
/tmp/install.img: (null)
INFO: mounting stage2 failed

Next steps, I already lost my vacation to this, I hope to keep my sanity:

Load drivers from kernel boot line?
Blacklist drivers on the kernel boot line?
Serial cable logging of boot?
Other?

-Jason

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] mairadb doesn't prompt for user/pass

2014-08-31 Thread David Beveridge
There is a program mysql_secure_installation which can be used to set a
root password and remove those accounts.
However it sounds like you did the job manually.

Did you also issue the sql command flush privileges?


On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hello,

  I discovered today that CentOS 7 has replaced MySQL with MariaDB. Which is
 fine, it's seems really similar. And I was already aware that it was
 written by the original team that wrote mysql.

 It's cool that the mysql command still gets you in!

 This is the version I have:

 [root@web1:~] #mysql --version
 mysql  Ver 15.1 Distrib 5.5.37-MariaDB, for Linux (x86_64) using readline
 5.1

 But for some reason all I have to do is type the word 'mysql' to get me
 into the database.

 That's ok for initial setup I guess. But once I was in a did away with all
 the accounts that either had blank set for the username, and updated all
 the accounts to use passwords.

 MariaDB [mysql] select User,'@',Host,Password from user;
 +---+---+---+---+

 | User  | @ | Host  | Password  |

 +---+---+---+---+

 | root  | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | root  | @ | web1  | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | root  | @ | 127.0.0.1 | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 | admin | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 |

 +---+---+---+---+

 4 rows in set (0.00 sec)

 I also did a search from root to find any my.cnf files and didn't find any
 that has user accounts in them.

 Also I find that for the root accounts I can't seem to login even if I set
 the password in the database without encryption and copy/paste the password
 into the prompt.

 However the non-root account (admin) does let you in with the password.

 So I'm wondering how to secure mariadb so that it doesnt' let you in
 without typing in a username and password and also why it doesn't let you
 log in as 'root'? Is the root account disallowed from logging in by
 default?

 Thanks
 Tim

 --
 GPG me!!

 gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and a SSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Rainer Duffner

Am 31.08.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:

 I have a fleet of 2970s and we are upgrading the hardrives on the motherboard 
 SATA ports (A/B not the PERC backplane) when a detecting hardware is 
 performed the system crashes, reboots and gives an E1422 error code (useless 
 video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhyMeUHJar4).
 
 We narrowed it down to a motherboard BIOS issue, if we remove the SSD or add 
 noprobe to the kernel the installer does not crash. 




Is that actually a supported configuration (in the Dell-sense)?.

Which is the „primary hard drive then? SATA or PERC?

Have you booted any other OS on it?
FreeBSD 10?
CentOS7?

Ubuntu?

Note that I have no idea about Dell servers. I’ve never worked with them in my 
professional life - but my experience is that trying the same thing more than 
three times in a row is a waste of time (and nerves: I can literally see my 
life being shortened by watching server-BIOS boot-up screens…)


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
I'm having some issues with Internet access from CentOS7 server which is
installed in Vmware Workstation 10.0.3 build-1895310 in Windows 7 x64. At
this point I can't get if the error is on CentOS configuration or it's
another problem so I leave here what I did in order to get Internet working
on that VM.

1) */etc/resolv.conf*
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
nameserver 4.2.2.2

2) */etc/sysconfig/network*
# Created by anaconda
HOSTNAME=webserver
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=8.8.4.4
DNS3=4.2.2.2

3)* /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1628*
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
DEFROUTE=yes
NAME=Internet Eth0
UUID=0a79e5fc-ee8a-41eb-93dd-a76e3cb8c7c1
ONBOOT=yes
HWADDR=00:50:56:2E:E2:4

4) ifconfig -a
*eno1628*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 186  bytes 20568 (20.0 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 31  bytes 4956 (4.8 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

*eno33555200*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.3.131  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.3.255
ether 00:50:56:3f:86:30  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 1016  bytes 106110 (103.6 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 859  bytes 108641 (106.0 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

*lo*: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0

*eno1628 *is the interface that should access to Internet since this is
the one I've configured in Vmware as bridged (connected directly to the
physical network interface of host) and also it's replicating physical
network connection. When I try to ping any as for example: www.google.com
DNS are not responding, see below:

# ping google.com
ping: unknown host google.com

Is something wrong in my configuration? I have some others CentOS 6.5 VM
running on the same Vmware Workstation and all of them can access Intertnet
but this one not. Any help?

Thx
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread alexandre

Check default route.. If installed
--
Enviado pelo aplicativo muMail para Android
domingo, 31 agosto 2014, 05:53PM -03:00 de reynie...@gmail.com 
reynie...@gmail.com:
I'm having some issues with Internet access from CentOS7 server which is
installed in Vmware Workstation 10.0.3 build-1895310 in Windows 7 x64. At
this point I can't get if the error is on CentOS configuration or it's
another problem so I leave here what I did in order to get Internet working
on that VM.
1) */etc/resolv.conf*
# Generated by NetworkManager
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
nameserver 4.2.2.2
2) */etc/sysconfig/network*
# Created by anaconda
HOSTNAME=webserver
DNS1=8.8.8.8
DNS2=8.8.4.4
DNS3=4.2.2.2
3)* /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1628*
TYPE=Ethernet
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
DEFROUTE=yes
NAME=Internet Eth0
UUID=0a79e5fc-ee8a-41eb-93dd-a76e3cb8c7c1
ONBOOT=yes
HWADDR=00:50:56:2E:E2:4
4) ifconfig -a
*eno1628*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 186  bytes 20568 (20.0 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 31  bytes 4956 (4.8 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
*eno33555200*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
inet 192.168.3.131  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.3.255
ether 00:50:56:3f:86:30  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
RX packets 1016  bytes 106110 (103.6 KiB)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 859  bytes 108641 (106.0 KiB)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
*lo*: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
*eno1628 *is the interface that should access to Internet since this is
the one I've configured in Vmware as bridged (connected directly to the
physical network interface of host) and also it's replicating physical
network connection. When I try to ping any as for example:  www.google.com
DNS are not responding, see below:
# ping google.com
ping: unknown host google.com
Is something wrong in my configuration? I have some others CentOS 6.5 VM
running on the same Vmware Workstation and all of them can access Intertnet
but this one not. Any help?
Thx
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
What you mean with check default route?
On Aug 31, 2014 4:31 PM, alexan...@onda.net.br wrote:


 Check default route.. If installed
 --
 Enviado pelo aplicativo muMail para Android
 domingo, 31 agosto 2014, 05:53PM -03:00 de reynie...@gmail.com 
 reynie...@gmail.com:
 I'm having some issues with Internet access from CentOS7 server which is
 installed in Vmware Workstation 10.0.3 build-1895310 in Windows 7 x64. At
 this point I can't get if the error is on CentOS configuration or it's
 another problem so I leave here what I did in order to get Internet working
 on that VM.
 1) */etc/resolv.conf*
 # Generated by NetworkManager
 nameserver 8.8.8.8
 nameserver 8.8.4.4
 nameserver 4.2.2.2
 2) */etc/sysconfig/network*
 # Created by anaconda
 HOSTNAME=webserver
 DNS1=8.8.8.8
 DNS2=8.8.4.4
 DNS3=4.2.2.2
 3)* /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1628*
 TYPE=Ethernet
 BOOTPROTO=dhcp
 DEFROUTE=yes
 NAME=Internet Eth0
 UUID=0a79e5fc-ee8a-41eb-93dd-a76e3cb8c7c1
 ONBOOT=yes
 HWADDR=00:50:56:2E:E2:4
 4) ifconfig -a
 *eno1628*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
 inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.1.255
 ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
 RX packets 186  bytes 20568 (20.0 KiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 31  bytes 4956 (4.8 KiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
 *eno33555200*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
 inet 192.168.3.131  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast 192.168.3.255
 ether 00:50:56:3f:86:30  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
 RX packets 1016  bytes 106110 (103.6 KiB)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 859  bytes 108641 (106.0 KiB)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
 *lo*: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
 inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
 loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
 RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
 RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
 TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
 TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
 *eno1628 *is the interface that should access to Internet since this is
 the one I've configured in Vmware as bridged (connected directly to the
 physical network interface of host) and also it's replicating physical
 network connection. When I try to ping any as for example:  www.google.com
 DNS are not responding, see below:
 # ping google.com
 ping: unknown host google.com
 Is something wrong in my configuration? I have some others CentOS 6.5 VM
 running on the same Vmware Workstation and all of them can access Intertnet
 but this one not. Any help?
 Thx
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org 
 [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
 Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 16:54
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell 
 PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)
 
 
 Am 31.08.2014 um 21:52 schrieb Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:
 
  I have a fleet of 2970s and we are upgrading the hardrives 
 on the motherboard SATA ports (A/B not the PERC backplane) 
 when a detecting hardware is performed the system crashes, 
 reboots and gives an E1422 error code (useless video: 
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhyMeUHJar4).
  
  We narrowed it down to a motherboard BIOS issue, if we 
 remove the SSD or add noprobe to the kernel the installer 
 does not crash. 
 
 
 
 
 Is that actually a supported configuration (in the Dell-sense)?.
 

Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing from spinning drives to 
SSD. I am working with Dell to get a BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.

 Which is the primary hard drive then? SATA or PERC?
 

It will be the SATA.

 Have you booted any other OS on it?

Centos 5/6 32/64

 FreeBSD 10?
 CentOS7?

About to try that.

 
 Ubuntu?
 
 Note that I have no idea about Dell servers. I've never 
 worked with them in my professional life - but my experience 
 is that trying the same thing more than three times in a row 

Agreed, but there are 20+ servers and twenty plus SSDs. The SSDs work fine in 
the non-PE2970 systems with RHEL/Centos 6 64bit.

 is a waste of time (and nerves: I can literally see my life 
 being shortened by watching server-BIOS boot-up screens.)

-Jason 

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Rainer Duffner

Am 31.08.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:


 
 Is that actually a supported configuration (in the Dell-sense)?.
 
 
 Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing from spinning drives 
 to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.
 
 





You can always try to install RHEL6 and open a ticket with RedHat if that 
fails, too….


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread Ed Donahue III
$ route -n

the one listed as gateway is your default route.
On Aug 31, 2014 5:03 PM, reynie...@gmail.com reynie...@gmail.com wrote:

 What you mean with check default route?
 On Aug 31, 2014 4:31 PM, alexan...@onda.net.br wrote:

 
  Check default route.. If installed
  --
  Enviado pelo aplicativo muMail para Android
  domingo, 31 agosto 2014, 05:53PM -03:00 de reynie...@gmail.com 
  reynie...@gmail.com:
  I'm having some issues with Internet access from CentOS7 server which is
  installed in Vmware Workstation 10.0.3 build-1895310 in Windows 7 x64. At
  this point I can't get if the error is on CentOS configuration or it's
  another problem so I leave here what I did in order to get Internet
 working
  on that VM.
  1) */etc/resolv.conf*
  # Generated by NetworkManager
  nameserver 8.8.8.8
  nameserver 8.8.4.4
  nameserver 4.2.2.2
  2) */etc/sysconfig/network*
  # Created by anaconda
  HOSTNAME=webserver
  DNS1=8.8.8.8
  DNS2=8.8.4.4
  DNS3=4.2.2.2
  3)* /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1628*
  TYPE=Ethernet
  BOOTPROTO=dhcp
  DEFROUTE=yes
  NAME=Internet Eth0
  UUID=0a79e5fc-ee8a-41eb-93dd-a76e3cb8c7c1
  ONBOOT=yes
  HWADDR=00:50:56:2E:E2:4
  4) ifconfig -a
  *eno1628*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
  inet 192.168.1.112  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast
 192.168.1.255
  ether 00:50:56:2e:e2:45  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
  RX packets 186  bytes 20568 (20.0 KiB)
  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
  TX packets 31  bytes 4956 (4.8 KiB)
  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
  *eno33555200*: flags=4163UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST  mtu 1500
  inet 192.168.3.131  netmask 255.255.255.0  broadcast
 192.168.3.255
  ether 00:50:56:3f:86:30  txqueuelen 1000  (Ethernet)
  RX packets 1016  bytes 106110 (103.6 KiB)
  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
  TX packets 859  bytes 108641 (106.0 KiB)
  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
  *lo*: flags=73UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING  mtu 65536
  inet 127.0.0.1  netmask 255.0.0.0
  loop  txqueuelen 0  (Local Loopback)
  RX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
  RX errors 0  dropped 0  overruns 0  frame 0
  TX packets 8  bytes 552 (552.0 B)
  TX errors 0  dropped 0 overruns 0  carrier 0  collisions 0
  *eno1628 *is the interface that should access to Internet since this
 is
  the one I've configured in Vmware as bridged (connected directly to the
  physical network interface of host) and also it's replicating physical
  network connection. When I try to ping any as for example:
 www.google.com
  DNS are not responding, see below:
  # ping google.com
  ping: unknown host google.com
  Is something wrong in my configuration? I have some others CentOS 6.5 VM
  running on the same Vmware Workstation and all of them can access
 Intertnet
  but this one not. Any help?
  Thx
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Ed Donahue III libera...@gmail.com wrote:

 $ route -n

 the one listed as gateway is your default route.



Ok, since my default route is bad,

# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG1024   00
eno33555200
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno16780032
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno33555200

I tried this two ways:

1) */etc/sysconfig/network*
 Add line GATEWAY=192.168.1.1

Restart the newtork service:
# service network restart
Restarting network (via systemctl):[  OK  ]

# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG1024   00
eno33555200
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno16780032
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno33555200

Still no changes

2) */etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eno1628*
 Add line GATEWAY=192.168.1.1

Restart the newtork service:
# service network restart
Restarting network (via systemctl):[  OK  ]

# route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.3.1 0.0.0.0 UG1024   00
eno33555200
192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno16780032
192.168.3.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00
eno33555200

Still no changes

What I'm doing wrong? Every time I do a network change/configuration I need
to restart the complete OS in order changes to take effect, why?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:


 who knows - looking at other threads - why did you assign *two*
 network interfaces to your virtual machine at all?


Because if for any reason WAN is down then I can reach the VM trough the
DHCP assigned IP I though



 who knows?
 why don't you just restart your network service in the guest?


Because this is not the problem, as I mention before I have another VM
running on the same Vmware and all of them has Internet access so the
problem is here with this one at some part but I'm able to find it
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 andaSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
 

 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org 
 [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Duffner
 Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:09
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell 
 PowerEdge 2970 andaSSD (hardware probing issues)
 
 
 Am 31.08.2014 um 23:03 schrieb Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:
 
 
  
  Is that actually a supported configuration (in the Dell-sense)?.
  
  
  Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing 
 from spinning drives to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a 
 BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.
  
 You can always try to install RHEL6 and open a ticket with 
 RedHat if that fails, too..

Started that route, it got pushed to Dell as a HW issue. But then again I was 
unable to articulate the cause (BIOS+SSD = invalid CPU instruction) back then.

-Jason

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/31/2014 2:27 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 Because this is not the problem, as I mention before I have another VM
 running on the same Vmware and all of them has Internet access so the
 problem is here with this one at some part but I'm able to find it

grep 192.168.3.1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/*

alternately, is the 192.168.3.x interface being configured by DHCP? 
perhaps its DHCP server is handing out that gateway.

-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Ok, now I've fixed the Internet connection by running this command: ip
route replace default via 192.168.1.1 but now I have two default routes:

# ip route show
default via 192.168.1.1 dev eno16780032
default via 192.168.3.1 dev eno33555200  proto static  metric 1024
192.168.1.0/24 dev eno16780032  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.1.112
192.168.3.0/24 dev eno33555200  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.3.131

Is that right? How do I remove the second one? (default via 192.168.3.1 dev
eno33555200  proto static  metric 1024)


On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:57 PM, reynie...@gmail.com reynie...@gmail.com
wrote:


 On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
 wrote:


 who knows - looking at other threads - why did you assign *two*
 network interfaces to your virtual machine at all?


 Because if for any reason WAN is down then I can reach the VM trough the
 DHCP assigned IP I though



 who knows?
 why don't you just restart your network service in the guest?


 Because this is not the problem, as I mention before I have another VM
 running on the same Vmware and all of them has Internet access so the
 problem is here with this one at some part but I'm able to find it


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
 Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing from spinning drives 
 to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.

is the SATA interface in AHCI mode or legacy IDE emulation?



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 5:03 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:

 grep 192.168.3.1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/*


# grep 192.168.3.1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/*
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-local:IPADDR=192.168.3.131
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-local:GATEWAY=192.168.3.1


 alternately, is the 192.168.3.x interface being configured by DHCP?
 perhaps its DHCP server is handing out that gateway.


No, it's handled static:

TYPE=Ethernet
ONBOOT=yes
BOOTPROTO=static
IPADDR=192.168.3.131
GATEWAY=192.168.3.1
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NAME=Local Eth1
UUID=0a79e5fc-ee8a-41eb-93dd-a76e3cb8c7c1
HWADDR=00:50:56:3F:86:30
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread Jason Pyeron

 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org 
 [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
 Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 17:34
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell 
 PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)
 
 On 8/31/2014 2:03 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
  Yes. They support internal SATA drives, we are changing 
 from spinning drives to SSD. I am working with Dell to get a 
 BIOS patch, but I wont hold my breath.
 
 is the SATA interface in AHCI mode or legacy IDE emulation?

Good question, I will ask Dell. The BIOS only has Off and Auto as choices. Is 
there a preference I should shoot for?

--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-   -
- Jason Pyeron  PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant  10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218   -
-   -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Can't reach Internet

2014-08-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/31/2014 2:35 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote:
 # grep 192.168.3.1/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/*
 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-local:IPADDR=192.168.3.131
 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-local:GATEWAY=192.168.3.1



localhost shouldn't have a gateway.  or that IP


hmm, I don't even have a ifconfig-local, just a ifcfg-lo, and it reads...

[root@new network-scripts]# more ifcfg-lo
DEVICE=lo
IPADDR=127.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.0.0.0
NETWORK=127.0.0.0
# If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a martian,
# you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255, for example)
BROADCAST=127.255.255.255
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=loopback


-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Install Centos 6 x86_64 on Dell PowerEdge 2970 and aSSD (hardware probing issues)

2014-08-31 Thread John R Pierce
On 8/31/2014 3:15 PM, Jason Pyeron wrote:
 Good question, I will ask Dell. The BIOS only has Off and Auto as choices. Is 
 there a preference I should shoot for?

ACHI is pretty much required for SSD support.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos