[CentOS] Building mod_suphp on Centos 7
I've downloaded the tarball. When I run ./configure, I get [sdstern@cumberland suphp-0.7.2]$ ./configure configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in config "."/config I've installed libtool, autoconf and automake. shtool and install-sh are installed. Any clues on how to get this to configure? Or does anyone know of a repo where I can get an rpm for C7? -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 11/16/2014 02:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > the other important feature the new mailman has is to munge the From: > field if the user's DNS has the DMARC records indicating a draconian > policy. Grrr, yes, of course, DMARC likes to check the From: header now (utterly stupid). Anyways, it should be possible to rewrite this with header_checks as well. I would tack @centos.org onto the end of the domain and call it a day. Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 11/15/2014 5:17 PM, Peter wrote: I think it's important to note that this actually isn't a bug. This is failure to strip DKIM headers when forwarding a message. Note that when RHEL6 was released DKIM was still new and DMARC was pretty much unheard of. It's not surprising that the version of Mailman in it does not take steps to remove DKIM headers as it's simply a feature that would not have existed when that version was released. the other important feature the new mailman has is to munge the From: field if the user's DNS has the DMARC records indicating a draconian policy. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 11/16/2014 12:09 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > The point is that mailman has the fix. I suppose you can look at the > question of whether you solve the problem only for yourself or for all > centos users as two different things but the solution is pretty much > the same as any other bug that has been fixed (far) upstream. I think it's important to note that this actually isn't a bug. This is failure to strip DKIM headers when forwarding a message. Note that when RHEL6 was released DKIM was still new and DMARC was pretty much unheard of. It's not surprising that the version of Mailman in it does not take steps to remove DKIM headers as it's simply a feature that would not have existed when that version was released. It's also important to note that these headers *can* be removed in postfix (and probably other MTAs can as well) after the messages are submitted by mailman, so while it would be nice for mailman to do it it's not strictly necessary, we can deal with the problem with the versions of mailman and postfix that are running on the server already. The trick is to simply set header_checks to match and remove the DKIM header which is quite easy. At that point we can have the server sign the message with its own DKIM signature and apply any relevant DMARC policy we want. I guess what I'm saying is you don't *need* a new version of mailman to deal with this, you don't need a new version of any software really, it can be dealt with the software we already have on the server with just a few config changes. Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos7 Net install on HP A1710N fails
Folks: This conversation was trying to get Centos 7 installed on a machine with a NIC that got de-supported in EL7. Following the advice to do as follows: - Install (via CD) the "minimal" ISO - add the RPM of kmod-forcedeth-0.64-1.el7.elrepo.x86_64.rpm from a USB stick, as obtained from ELPRO (install went without serious complaint) I'm at a loss of what to do next, namely - How do I tell Centos that there's a NIC, and how do I configure it? PS: There is no GUI, and the command line display is very tiny. Guidance would be appreciated. David ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 15/11/14 23:09, Les Mikesell wrote: > The point is that mailman has the fix. I suppose you can look at the > question of whether you solve the problem only for yourself or for all > centos users as two different things but the solution is pretty much > the same as any other bug that has been fixed (far) upstream. > or host the fix in the plus repos and let people decide which mailman they want to use. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > On 14/11/14 18:09, Les Mikesell wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >>> So in practice I think this really boils down to the common problem of ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in CentOS with the list system eating its own dog food. That is, there is a fix for mailman, but not in the CentOS version. Sometimes stability is good, sometimes you need the updates. >>> >>> can you file this at bugs.centos.org please >>> >> >> There was already one: >> https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7149 >> is about this issue. It already has a comment about centos following >> upstream, but upstream doesn't seem to care unless you have paid >> support: >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095359 >> > > there are really 2 differnet things here, 1) what is the mailman > included in a specific centos vesion doing and 2) what is the > lists.centos.org machine doing with DKIM and what is the larger fix for > each of those things. The point is that mailman has the fix. I suppose you can look at the question of whether you solve the problem only for yourself or for all centos users as two different things but the solution is pretty much the same as any other bug that has been fixed (far) upstream. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 11/16/2014 11:11 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > 2) what is the > lists.centos.org machine doing with DKIM and what is the larger fix for > each of those things. Did you get the off-list email I sent a couple days ago irt this? Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 14/11/14 18:09, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 4:07 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote: >> >>> So in practice I think this really boils down to the common problem of >>> ancient software shipped by RHEL and the bug-for-bug compatibility in >>> CentOS with the list system eating its own dog food. That is, there >>> is a fix for mailman, but not in the CentOS version. Sometimes >>> stability is good, sometimes you need the updates. >> >> can you file this at bugs.centos.org please >> > > There was already one: > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7149 > is about this issue. It already has a comment about centos following > upstream, but upstream doesn't seem to care unless you have paid > support: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095359 > there are really 2 differnet things here, 1) what is the mailman included in a specific centos vesion doing and 2) what is the lists.centos.org machine doing with DKIM and what is the larger fix for each of those things. -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On 2014/11/15 08:28, Les Mikesell wrote: On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Always Learning wrote: Why keep masses and masses of irrelevant data in an unstructured format presided over by Google? Its not logical sense. Essentially, why store a lot of "rubbish" that will never ever be needed ? Email is inherently unstructured and searches are over some set of words that I happen to remember. So you really need a full text indexer which google happens to be very good at. And the storage is their problem...Actually thunderbird is very nice at this too if you do have your own copy - I don't remember if you have to enable indexing or if it is the default now. Why? Because keeping "masses of irrelevant data" takes none of my time and when I need to dig for something there are ways to do so that cost me little or no time. Storing the irrelevant data is cheap, my time isn't and I have very little time to spend on something like email. I converged on a solution that works for me and lets me do my job and take care of my family in a relatively efficient way. Sure there are all sorts of things I could do to be "better" but I have neither the time or resources to devote to making those happen. So I live with what I have. Les, I believe TB does index by default. I recall seeing a setting for that someplace in the menus. Thunderbird's search is pretty good, pretty much like gmail's in fact. Miranda ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
On 11/15/2014 10:20 AM, Gergely Buday wrote: >>> Now the ps/2 mouse does not work, even after reboot. What should >>> I do? >> >> If the computer was turned on when you did this swapping around, >> there is a slight chance that you shorted the connection and killed >> the socket. > > I reconnected the other keyboard and I write this e-mail from it so > this did not happen. Thanks for the advice though. try another mouse. try mouse on diff box. in both cases, _turn_off_power_ before connecting and disconnecting. use usb mouse. -- peace out. in a world with out fences, who needs gates. tc,hago. g . ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Always Learning wrote: > > Why keep masses and masses of irrelevant data in an unstructured format > presided over by Google? Its not logical sense. Essentially, why store > a lot of "rubbish" that will never ever be needed ? > Email is inherently unstructured and searches are over some set of words that I happen to remember. So you really need a full text indexer which google happens to be very good at. And the storage is their problem...Actually thunderbird is very nice at this too if you do have your own copy - I don't remember if you have to enable indexing or if it is the default now. -- Les Mikesell lesmiks...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6
On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number >> keys. > > This is a known issue, I will have another version soon (hopefully by > Monday). > There is now a new Chromium pushed: chromium-browser-38.0.2125.111-1.el6.centos signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:24:59 + Always Learning wrote: > Shouldn't USB be 'hot swappable' with the current limited to about 0.5 > amps ? USB connections are hot swappable, but PS/2 sockets are not. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 10:12 -0600, Frank Cox wrote: > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:04:14 +0100 > Gergely Buday wrote: > > > Now the ps/2 mouse does not work, even after reboot. What should I do? > > If the computer was turned on when you did this swapping around, there is a > slight chance that you shorted the connection and killed the socket. Shouldn't USB be 'hot swappable' with the current limited to about 0.5 amps ? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Learning until I die or experience dementia. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Not To James B. Byrne
On Fri, 2014-11-14 at 11:50 -1000, Miranda Hawarden-Ogata wrote: > I could do that I suppose, but I haven't and probably wouldn't have the > time necessary to separate out the emails between the two accounts. I > already have 6+ email accounts that I have to monitor so I'd rather not > fork off another if I can help it. > It's not the time, just the byte volume. I get ~15GB of space for free > per account, I think. > The vast majority of my email unfortunately is not publicly archived, so > I don't have that option. Writing as a humble programmer, why don't you and Les write your own database application (using HTML, CSS, PHP and MariaDB (MySQL)) and store the important parts (or wholes) of emails in the database ? I do this. I can search on 'text', database entry descriptions, 6 keyword fields, entry date, overdue date etc. and can email out from within the database system which has menu lists of email addresses. I can have 1 million topics and each topic can have 99 items of separate correspondence. Each separate item can link to 9 web items or stored items (PDFs, ODT, pictures etc.) stored on the server. Data can be retrieved in less than 2 seconds. The inbuilt links produce lists of related items. The system links into other databases (Names/addresses/emails/telephone numbers, information storage etc. etc.) Why keep masses and masses of irrelevant data in an unstructured format presided over by Google? Its not logical sense. Essentially, why store a lot of "rubbish" that will never ever be needed ? Happy Weekend. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
> > Now the ps/2 mouse does not work, even after reboot. What should I do? > > If the computer was turned on when you did this swapping around, there is a > slight chance that you shorted the connection and killed the socket. I reconnected the other keyboard and I write this e-mail from it so this did not happen. Thanks for the advice though. - Gergely ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:04:14 +0100 Gergely Buday wrote: > Now the ps/2 mouse does not work, even after reboot. What should I do? If the computer was turned on when you did this swapping around, there is a slight chance that you shorted the connection and killed the socket. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ps/2 mouse stopped working
Hi there, I was using a ps/2 mouse. I had to connect a ps/2 keyboard. As I have only one ps/2 socket I connected an usb mouse. I then removed the other keyboard and reconnected the ps/2 mouse and removed the usb mouse. Now the ps/2 mouse does not work, even after reboot. What should I do? - Gergely ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Mother boards for Centos 7
Hi list, I need a new mobo for my workstation. I'm planning to buy Asus Z97K or Asus Z97 Pro and install Centos 7. Anyone has experiences with these mobos? I need to know if Z97 chipset and NIC Realtek 8111GR are supported by C7. Another question about Intel I218V NIC installed on Asus Z97 Pro. Is it supported? I've ridden from google that Z97 chipset seems be supported by Linux but I need a valid confirmation for C7 Support. From this link https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=47149 seems that C7 works great with Z97. For Intel i218C and Realtek 8111GR I can't get info. If these two mobos are not supported by C7 can you tell me some asus model? Thanks in advance. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Setting up NFS on Centos 6.6
I've been following the guide found here: http://openvz.org/NFS_server_inside_container Which says that this is no problem. > On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 02:44:15 +0900 > c...@qgenuity.com wrote: > >> The server provider has loaded the nfsd module. > >> FATAL: Module nfsd not found. > > Apparently not. > > -- > MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
