[CentOS-es] Necesito de su orientación
Mantengo un servidor web (Centos 5.11) con mysql server 5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 y al intentar hacerle un upgrade a mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 me origina el siguiente conflicto que no se como tratar: ile /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 Alguna idea? IMPORTANTE: Si decide reenviar este correo para resguardo de tus contactos y los míos: 1.- Borre mi nombre y dirección y reenvié bajo Bcc o Cco (copia ciega o copia oculta). 2.- Evite que direcciones confiadas a usted por sus amigos y relacionados, sean capturadas. 3.- Borre cualquier dirección que aparezca en los correos que recibe, evite entregar las direcciones de e-mail de sus amigos, relacionados o conocidos a cualquier persona. 4.- Coloque este mensaje en todos sus correos para que no nos olvidemos de este proceso. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
Jason Pyeron wrote: I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, Exact message please? The certificate does not apply to the given host The certificate is not signed by any trusted certificate authority Do I really have to use a separate cert and key for dovecot? Can I not use the standard cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs (and key) from CACert.org ? Post the certificate only, not the private key. I've looked at the cert and key and they look ok for what they are, a self-signed certificate and key, as created (years ago) following the instructions in the dovecot installation instructions. I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/ Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
-Original Message- From: Timothy Murphy Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 10:13 Jason Pyeron wrote: I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, Exact message please? The certificate does not apply to the given host So lets deal with this first. What is the hostname? What is the subject of the certificate [hint, I asked for the cert to be posted last time]? The certificate is not signed by any trusted certificate authority We will address this after we get more data on the problem. Do I really have to use a separate cert and key for dovecot? Can I not use the standard cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs (and key) from CACert.org ? Post the certificate only, not the private key. Like this: openssl x509 /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem I've looked at the cert and key and they look ok for what they are, a self-signed certificate and key, as created (years ago) following the instructions in the dovecot installation instructions. I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/ Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot? It depends on what you mean by special and was it done properly the first time. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
On Tue, March 3, 2015 9:41 am, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Hi, I just had the weirdest of system crashed. Here goes. I wanted to install a desktop step by step, as I usually do. First the base system, then the X Window System, then the WindowMaker window manager. Everything went OK, then I installed kmod-nvidia from ELRepo. Yum informed me that the driver conflicted with x11-glamor (something like that), so I removed the corresponding package. While doing all this, the system still defaulted to boot in console mode (meaning multi-user.target and not graphical.target). To test X, I just launched WindowMaker using startx. Anyway, I rebooted, and then... nothing. System refused even to startup, and systemd suggested to me that I open journalctl (which taught me nothing). Right now I've started a Slax LiveCD to backup all my data and reinstall the whole thing from scratch. I don't have the slightest clue as to what could possibly have happened here. The only thing I wonder: could it be that installing the kmod-nvidia driver while booting to a default console (and not graphical) could lead to this weirdness? A previous installation on that machine went OK, but the difference was that the first time, I started with a full GNOME installation right away. Any suggestions? If I were to troubleshoot this I would do it the following way: 1. wipe everything and set up standard desktop set with Xwindow 2. install nvidia driver 3. remove packages you don't like and replace them with the ones you like to achieve your final configuration Why? Because all usually is tested in pretty much standard set of packages, thus if you follow the route above you will unlikely have your box bricked after installing nvidia driver. Then in step 3 you will discover doing which of your customizations breaks things. I call it for myself lazy person easy path approach ;-) Just my $0.02. Valeri Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Custom user profile for GNOME 3?
On Tue, March 3, 2015 06:27, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, I wonder where - and eventually how - GNOME 3 stores its user preferences. I'd like to create a custom user profile, with slightly different settings than the default ones: You might take a look at the gsettings utility. -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrnemailto:byrn...@harte-lyne.ca Harte Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
Hi, I just had the weirdest of system crashed. Here goes. I wanted to install a desktop step by step, as I usually do. First the base system, then the X Window System, then the WindowMaker window manager. Everything went OK, then I installed kmod-nvidia from ELRepo. Yum informed me that the driver conflicted with x11-glamor (something like that), so I removed the corresponding package. While doing all this, the system still defaulted to boot in console mode (meaning multi-user.target and not graphical.target). To test X, I just launched WindowMaker using startx. Anyway, I rebooted, and then... nothing. System refused even to startup, and systemd suggested to me that I open journalctl (which taught me nothing). Right now I've started a Slax LiveCD to backup all my data and reinstall the whole thing from scratch. I don't have the slightest clue as to what could possibly have happened here. The only thing I wonder: could it be that installing the kmod-nvidia driver while booting to a default console (and not graphical) could lead to this weirdness? A previous installation on that machine went OK, but the difference was that the first time, I started with a full GNOME installation right away. Any suggestions? Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
-Original Message- From: Timothy Murphy Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 9:55 I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, Exact message please? /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem which I created years ago following the dovecot instructions. Do I really have to use a separate cert and key for dovecot? Can I not use the standard cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs (and key) from CACert.org ? Post the certificate only, not the private key. That is the part between -BEGIN CERTIFICATE- and -END CERTIFICATE-. If you have a binary file, pipe it to 'openssl x509 -inform DER' -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100- - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
On 03/03/2015 08:12 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Jason Pyeron wrote: I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, Exact message please? The certificate does not apply to the given host The certificate is not signed by any trusted certificate authority Do I really have to use a separate cert and key for dovecot? Can I not use the standard cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs (and key) from CACert.org ? Post the certificate only, not the private key. I've looked at the cert and key and they look ok for what they are, a self-signed certificate and key, as created (years ago) following the instructions in the dovecot installation instructions. I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/ Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot? There's not really a standard SSL certificate. Perhaps you're referring to a default certificate used by the webserver? What I typically do is get a real, but free, SSL certificate from some place like StartSSL (www.startssl.com), and then copy the key and certificate to the location that's specified for use by dovecot. That way, both httpd and dovecot are using the same certificate (although it's stored in 2 different locations). The other thing to consider with dovecot (if you go with a third-party certificate) is that you may need to append the intermediate certificate to your server-specific certificate to properly establish the chain of trust for clients attempting to verify it. -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Any suggestions? There are multiple nvidia drivers in Elrepo, depending on the model of video card. Install and run nvidia-detect to find out which driver you need; just installing the kmod-nvidia package is not guaranteed to give you a working driver. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
Le 03.03.2015 17:00, Steve Thompson a écrit : On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Any suggestions? There are multiple nvidia drivers in Elrepo, depending on the model of video card. Install and run nvidia-detect to find out which driver you need; just installing the kmod-nvidia package is not guaranteed to give you a working driver. I used nvidia-detect, and installed kmod-nvidia. Even then, the previous installation ran kmod-nvidia with success on twin monitors. And even then, installing the wrong NVidia driver should only result in X failing to start... but not in a system that won't even *boot*. Startup messages stopped short immediately, I'd say right after initramfs was loaded. On a side note: before using CentOS, I ran Slackware for a few years, so I know how to configure X and video drivers manually. I've never seen this sort of weird crash. Niki Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Custom user profile for GNOME 3?
Niki, Look at dconf / gsettings. HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: Niki Kovacs i...@microlinux.fr To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Tuesday, 3 March, 2015 11:27:31 Subject: [CentOS] Custom user profile for GNOME 3? Hi, I wonder where - and eventually how - GNOME 3 stores its user preferences. I'd like to create a custom user profile, with slightly different settings than the default ones: * don't show home folder on ~/Desktop * don't show Trash * use custom default wallpaper * stretch wallpaper instead of zooming * use different default icon theme * etc. Until now I've done this successfully with desktop environments like GNOME 2, Xfce or KDE. I just copied over the relevant files from ~/.config, ~/.kde4 (IIRC), ~/.gconf or whatever to /etc/skel, and newly created users had their settings ready. Anybody knows how I can manage this with GNOME 3? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-es] Necesito de su orientación
Quizas necesites hacer antes un update de tus librerías, porque según la versión de centos que usas tiene pinta de estar la máquina un poco desfasada. Un saludo El 3 de marzo de 2015, 16:00, Luis J. Feo luisj...@hotmail.com escribió: Mantengo un servidor web (Centos 5.11) con mysql server 5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 y al intentar hacerle un upgrade a mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 me origina el siguiente conflicto que no se como tratar: ile /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 Alguna idea? IMPORTANTE: Si decide reenviar este correo para resguardo de tus contactos y los míos: 1.- Borre mi nombre y dirección y reenvié bajo Bcc o Cco (copia ciega o copia oculta). 2.- Evite que direcciones confiadas a usted por sus amigos y relacionados, sean capturadas. 3.- Borre cualquier dirección que aparezca en los correos que recibe, evite entregar las direcciones de e-mail de sus amigos, relacionados o conocidos a cualquier persona. 4.- Coloque este mensaje en todos sus correos para que no nos olvidemos de este proceso. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
Jason Pyeron wrote: I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/ Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot? It depends on what you mean by special and was it done properly the first time. The cert and key in /etc/pki/tls seem to work perfectly well. My impression is that this is the standard place for CentOS and Fedora certs. IIRC, installation guides for both suggest this for certs and keys. Most Fedora applications that require authentication also seem to refer to this folder. My question is simply: Does one require a separate cert for dovecot? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
On 03/03/15 18:47, Niki Kovacs wrote: Le 03/03/2015 19:25, Jonathan Billings a écrit : One of the things that the nvidia driver adds is nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau to the kernel arguments. Do you see them? I know that we saw the kernel panic when the nouveau driver was loaded on a el6.6 system with an NVidia K620, so perhaps when you brought in X11 you also installed the nouveau drivers? One thing I did this time was to make sure there weren't any incompatible drivers (like 'nouveau') installed *before* actually installing and configuring kmod-nvidia. Now everything works as expected. The elrepo nvidia drivers will disable the nouveau driver automatically so you don't need to worry about things like that. Don't over-think it. I would recommend you just set up your system the way you want it with at least a minimal working Xorg installation, and fully updated. Then just: yum install nvidia-detect yum install $(nvidia-detect) and reboot, and you should be good to go. I can't be sure 100 %, but I think this was the culprit. Cheers, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
-Original Message-
From: Timothy Murphy
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 14:19
Greg Bailey wrote:
I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be
the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/
Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot?
I think at this point, I will say: Works for me.
[root@node001 ~]# openssl x509 /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem
-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-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-END CERTIFICATE-
[root@node001 ~]#
Note the common name against the prompt's hostname.
All of our enterprise users can connect on many different clients.
There's not really a standard SSL certificate. Perhaps you're
referring to a default certificate used by the webserver?
No. I should have said standard locate.
I think both Fedora and CentOS create the folders
/etc/pki/tls/{certs,private},
so I assume this means that certs and keys should be store there.
What I typically do is get a real, but free, SSL
certificate from some
place like StartSSL (www.startssl.com), and then copy the key and
certificate to the location that's specified for use by dovecot.
My question exactly - is there any reason why one should not do that?
Or even more simply, give the locations /etc/pki/tls/{certs,private}
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf ?
Where you get or create your cert from is irrelevant.
The error messages indicate a hostname mismatch among other issues, but I
cannot help you if you don't provide the answers or data to help you.
-Jason
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us -
- Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100-
- +1 (443) 269-1555 x333Baltimore, Maryland 21218 -
- -
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-es] Necesito de su orientación
Posiblemente ocupaste repositorio distinto cuando instalaste mysql conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient deberias desinstalar el mysqlclient y volver a instalar Saludos El 3 de marzo de 2015, 13:41, José Luis Respeto Alvarez joseluisresp...@gmail.com escribió: Quizas necesites hacer antes un update de tus librerías, porque según la versión de centos que usas tiene pinta de estar la máquina un poco desfasada. Un saludo El 3 de marzo de 2015, 16:00, Luis J. Feo luisj...@hotmail.com escribió: Mantengo un servidor web (Centos 5.11) con mysql server 5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 y al intentar hacerle un upgrade a mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 me origina el siguiente conflicto que no se como tratar: ile /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/mysql/libmysqlclient_r.so.16.0.0 from install of mysql51w-libs-5.1.73-2.w5.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libmysqlclient16-5.1.69-1.w5.x86_64 Alguna idea? IMPORTANTE: Si decide reenviar este correo para resguardo de tus contactos y los míos: 1.- Borre mi nombre y dirección y reenvié bajo Bcc o Cco (copia ciega o copia oculta). 2.- Evite que direcciones confiadas a usted por sus amigos y relacionados, sean capturadas. 3.- Borre cualquier dirección que aparezca en los correos que recibe, evite entregar las direcciones de e-mail de sus amigos, relacionados o conocidos a cualquier persona. 4.- Coloque este mensaje en todos sus correos para que no nos olvidemos de este proceso. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
Greg Bailey wrote:
I'm really just asking if I cannot just use what I take to be
the standard openssl certificate and key in /etc/pki/tls/
Do I really have to create up a special cert for dovecot?
There's not really a standard SSL certificate. Perhaps you're
referring to a default certificate used by the webserver?
No. I should have said standard locate.
I think both Fedora and CentOS create the folders
/etc/pki/tls/{certs,private},
so I assume this means that certs and keys should be store there.
What I typically do is get a real, but free, SSL certificate from some
place like StartSSL (www.startssl.com), and then copy the key and
certificate to the location that's specified for use by dovecot.
My question exactly - is there any reason why one should not do that?
Or even more simply, give the locations /etc/pki/tls/{certs,private}
in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf ?
--
Timothy Murphy
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:41:01PM +0100, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Anyway, I rebooted, and then... nothing. System refused even to startup, and systemd suggested to me that I open journalctl (which taught me nothing). This doesn't make any sense. You said 'nothing' but it also suggested you run journalctl? So it wasn't nothing. What exactly did it do? Did it drop into the rescue shell? Did it kernel panic? Did you see some text then the screen blanked? Did you try older any older kernels that might have been loaded? One of the things that the nvidia driver adds is nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau to the kernel arguments. Do you see them? I know that we saw the kernel panic when the nouveau driver was loaded on a el6.6 system with an NVidia K620, so perhaps when you brought in X11 you also installed the nouveau drivers? -- Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
Le 03/03/2015 18:45, Scott Robbins a écrit : This might have to do with the NVidia update, explained on the elrepo pages. http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia You may have an older card that will require the 340xx versions of the various NVidia tools. No, it's a GT520 which is supposed to work with the latest driver. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
Le 03/03/2015 19:25, Jonathan Billings a écrit : One of the things that the nvidia driver adds is nouveau.modeset=0 rdblacklist=nouveau to the kernel arguments. Do you see them? I know that we saw the kernel panic when the nouveau driver was loaded on a el6.6 system with an NVidia K620, so perhaps when you brought in X11 you also installed the nouveau drivers? One thing I did this time was to make sure there weren't any incompatible drivers (like 'nouveau') installed *before* actually installing and configuring kmod-nvidia. Now everything works as expected. I can't be sure 100 %, but I think this was the culprit. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? What is the context here? The big problem with ftp is that it passes the user credentials in the clear. There is nothing particularly wrong with an anonymous ftp download area where the files are put in place with something more secure - but it is usually easier to use http for that and you'll have less trouble with firewalls. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On Mar 2, 2015, at 3:43 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Why not? SFTP clients are now as readily available as FTP clients. Unless you’re going to tell me it needs to be done from a box you absolutely positively cannot install any new software on, I simply don’t believe that you cannot use anything but FTP. Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? Not exactly, but it fights the same set of goals that SELinux was created to support. The point of SELinux is to erect walls that prevent a lesser breach from turning into a total breach of the system’s security. Allowing FTP doesn’t prevent SELinux from working. If FTP exposes one of your user’s passwords to the wide world, *theoretically* that means you have done nothing worse than providing unauthorized users access to that user’s account. (Not that that isn’t bad enough.) Unfortunately, local root-escalation exploits pop up from time to time which allow anyone with a login on that box to turn themselves into superuser, which allows them to defeat SELinux. Incidentally, it is possible to configure SSH to allow SFTP but not interactive logins. You should also chroot SFTP users. This thread seems to have the details you need: https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2080 By doing that, even a bad user who gives away their login credentials to a bad actor isn’t opening you to a risk of a local root escalation exploit. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? What is the context here? The big problem with ftp is that it passes the user credentials in the clear. There is nothing particularly wrong with an anonymous ftp download area where the files are put in place with something more secure - but it is usually easier to use http for that and you'll have less trouble with firewalls. -- Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com Enough about FTP vs SFTP. This is exactly the kind of unhelpful discussion that I was referring to last month about the conversations on this list. CentOS is an *enterprise* distribution and as such it would be expected that people are either bound by corporate restrictions, or have some other requirements that you're not aware of. A single helpful comment reminding someone that they should be using SFTP instead of FTP is the only appropriate thing to be saying here, not this dead-horse-beating. So to actually address the stated problem... I don't know about proftpd, but there's a page here that discusses getting it working with selinux: http://selinuxproject.org/page/FTPRecipes and I'm sure that clicking this link will lead you to other helpful documents: https://www.google.com/search?q=proftpd+selinux+centos+7 It does require that you have an understanding of selinux, and are not just looking for a magic incantation to make it work. You can look at the audit log in /var/log/audit to get an idea of what is failing, and also the 'audit2why' and 'audit2allow' commands can help to suggest what selinux settings need to be changed or are getting in the way. P.S. FTP is not secure, so you should try to use SFTP if you are able to influence the requirements. ❧ Brian Mathis @orev ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
On 03/04/2015 08:12 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: My question is simply: Does one require a separate cert for dovecot? Dovecot does not care if you use the same cert for other applications. Your question is missing the point, others are trying to tell you that the real issue is that the cert was not created properly for the hostname that the IMAP clients are connecting to. This has nothing to do with sharing the certificate with other applications. I use the same cert for dovecot, postfix and apache. They are all individually happy with this single cert, but they all use the same hostname to connect (mail.example.com) and so can have the same commonname. Peter ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Apologies for the late replies
*sigh* There seems to have been a problem with my hosting provider's mailqueues this morning. As in, I called, and told them, and no one had reported it, and I even got an actual trouble ticket g So, I'm assuming they just figured it out. I sent the one on the cert, and the other, before 11:00 this morning Sorry to post-add to the conversation. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
i...@microlinux.fr wrote: I just had the weirdest of system crashed. Here goes. I wanted to install a desktop step by step, as I usually do. First the base system, then the X Window System, then the WindowMaker window manager. Everything went OK, then I installed kmod-nvidia from ELRepo. Yum informed me that the driver conflicted with x11-glamor (something like that), so I removed the corresponding package. That would be the openGL libraries. kmod-nvidia will install its own. While doing all this, the system still defaulted to boot in console mode (meaning multi-user.target and not graphical.target). To test X, I just launched WindowMaker using startx. Anyway, I rebooted, and then... nothing. System refused even to startup, and systemd suggested to me that I open journalctl (which taught me nothing). I'm a tad confused: you say nothing, and that system refused to startup, but systemd is talking. Where is it in the bootup? What happens if you edit the grub kernel line one time, to s, so that it boots to single user mode? snip mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
Timothy Murphy wrote: Jason Pyeron wrote: I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, Exact message please? The certificate does not apply to the given host This one indicates, I believe, that when you created the certs, you didn't use the hostname of the system that you're running now, or maybe that it wants either the FQDN, or the shortname, and it's finding the opposite. The certificate is not signed by any trusted certificate authority snip This one will always be there, since you're not a root c/a. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] dhclient.conf
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:02 AM, Pol Hallen cento...@fuckaround.org wrote:
Hi all :-)
on centos 6 I need keep the hostname from a dhcp server:
cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0
DEVICE=eth0
HWADDR=00:50:56:27:0E:C8
TYPE=Ethernet
UUID=20924b21-e92a-4944-a054-06d1967155c1
ONBOOT=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=yes
BOOTPROTO=dhcp
PEERDNS=yes
with this config, centos keep only ip from dhcp server (not gw, not dns)
where is dhclient.conf? I need to create it? If yes, where're the default
options?
In DHCP server all this parameters (like DNS, GW, Netmask) have to be
configure first. if you want to set the default options
for GW and DNS then please do the changes in DHCP server like below.
Here is the example of dhcpd.conf file,
#
# DHCP Server Config File
#
ddns-update-style none;
ignore client-updates;
lease-file-name /var/lib/dhcpd/dhcpd.leases;
authoritative;
option domain-name example.com;
default-lease-time 86400; # 24 hours
max-lease-time 172800; # 48 hours
subnet 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 {
option routers 192.168.1.1;
option subnet-mask 255.255.255.0;
option broadcast-address192.168.1.255;
option domain-name-servers 192.168.1.1;
option ntp-servers 192.168.1.1;
range 192.168.1.101 192.168.1.200;
}
--Regards
Ashishkumar S. Yadav
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
Peter wrote: On 03/04/2015 08:12 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: My question is simply: Does one require a separate cert for dovecot? Dovecot does not care if you use the same cert for other applications. Thank you, that was my question. Your question is missing the point, others are trying to tell you that the real issue is that the cert was not created properly for the hostname that the IMAP clients are connecting to. This has nothing to do with sharing the certificate with other applications. I don't really care what is wrong with it, if I can do without it. I'm using the /etc/pki/tls/ cert and key in dovecot now, and they seem to work fine. Incidentally, I created the /etc/pki/dovecot/ cert and key years ago, and never got this flood of warning messages until recently. If in fact it is unnecessary to create a special cert and key for dovecot it seems to me remiss not to say this in the dovecot installation doc. -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On Mar 3, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Brian Mathis brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote: people are bound by corporate restrictions That seems like an awfully convenient rug to sweep problems under. Can’t fix a security problem? Corporate restrictions! Can’t require sensible security defaults restrictions by default? Corporate restrictions! Can’t move off IE6? Corporate restrictions! This seems like code for “We’d really rather computing in 2015 worked like computing in 1995.” I’d say this continued “dead horse beating” is helpful. No one should come away from proposing a solution based on FTP in 2015 without being chastised for it. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install latest gcc/g++ dev tools on centos
yum install gcc yum install gcc-c++ 在 2015年02月23日 08:22, Adekoya Adekunle 写道: Guys, How can I install the latest version of gcc/g++ development tools on my centos ? I have version 4.1.* on the machine. Can I do above from yum ? I would be glad to read your responses to my questions Br Kunle ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install latest gcc/g++ dev tools on centos
On 2/22/2015 4:22 PM, Adekoya Adekunle wrote: How can I install the latest version of gcc/g++ development tools on my centos ? I have version 4.1.* on the machine. centos 6 cames with gcc 4.4.7, centos 7 uses 4.8.2.yum update should get you the latest supported release. what version of centos do you have? gcc 4.1 is fairly old (2006-2007) if you need newer versions of gcc and support than your version of CentOS supports, the only way to get them woujld be to build your own in to run in an alternate directory, such as /usr/local/gcc49, rather than replace the standard versions, otherwise you'll likely break things that depend on the standard version for your OS.. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] dhclient.conf
Hi all :-) on centos 6 I need keep the hostname from a dhcp server: cat /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 HWADDR=00:50:56:27:0E:C8 TYPE=Ethernet UUID=20924b21-e92a-4944-a054-06d1967155c1 ONBOOT=yes NM_CONTROLLED=yes BOOTPROTO=dhcp PEERDNS=yes with this config, centos keep only ip from dhcp server (not gw, not dns) where is dhclient.conf? I need to create it? If yes, where're the default options? thanks for help! Pol ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] install latest gcc/g++ dev tools on centos
On 3/3/2015 4:13 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 2/22/2015 4:22 PM, Adekoya Adekunle wrote: How can I install the latest version of gcc/g++ development tools on my centos ? I have version 4.1.* on the machine. centos 6 cames with gcc 4.4.7, centos 7 uses 4.8.2.yum update should get you the latest supported release. what version of centos do you have? gcc 4.1 is fairly old (2006-2007) if you need newer versions of gcc and support than your version of CentOS supports, the only way to get them woujld be to build your own in to run in an alternate directory, such as /usr/local/gcc49, rather than replace the standard versions, otherwise you'll likely break things that depend on the standard version for your OS.. ok, gcc 4.1.2 was bundled with CentOS 5 (I forgot I had one centos 5 legacy test/dev system left alive)... you can yum install gcc44 gcc44-c++ to get 4.4.7, is that new enough? note this installs the compiler as /usr/bin/gcc44 and g++44 so you'll need to update any of your build scripts to specify gcc44 and/or g++44 to use this newer version. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] selinux allow FTP
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2015-03-03 0:43 GMT+02:00 Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com: errr, I meant, sftp, not rscp Heh.. yeah. But the client isn't gonna go for that. LOL. Any way to allow regular ol' FTP using SELinux? Or does that just defeat the purpose of having a secure SELlinux server entirely? FTP is not safe as it does not encrypt username(s) and password(s) or traffic during transfer. I'd choose SSH for my own users. And for customers if proper steps are taken to prevent any interactive shells (it's even dicier with shared hosting). RHEL/Centos provides SELinux booleans and settings at least for vsftpd (very secure ftpd). Please use it, if possible. Use FTPS protocol? http://wiki.vpslink.com/Configuring_vsftpd_for_secure_connections_(TLS/SSL/SFTP) -- ---~~.~~--- Mike // SilverTip257 // ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] disk space trouble on ec2 instance
On Mar 1, 2015, at 5:17 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe a little unconventional, but at least it got the job done. Adding disks is unconventional in the physical server world because it has a minimum base cost and you eventually run out of disk bays in the chassis. You quickly hit practical limits. In the VM world, you’re just creating yet another a large-ish file inside a much larger pool of storage. The only problem I can think of from doing this is that it means you’re fooling the OS into believing it has multiple disks that it can access in parallel when in reality accesses to both will cause the same set of disk arms to be seeking back and forth, tripping each other up. This is no worse in practice than using partitions instead of separate physical volumes, however. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Strange crash after NVidia driver installation from ELRepo
On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 05:08:10PM +0100, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Le 03.03.2015 17:00, Steve Thompson a écrit : On Tue, 3 Mar 2015, i...@microlinux.fr wrote: Any suggestions? There are multiple nvidia drivers in Elrepo, depending on the model of video card. Install and run nvidia-detect to find out which driver you need; just installing the kmod-nvidia package is not guaranteed to give you a working driver. I used nvidia-detect, and installed kmod-nvidia. Even then, the previous installation ran kmod-nvidia with success on twin monitors. This might have to do with the NVidia update, explained on the elrepo pages. http://elrepo.org/tiki/kmod-nvidia You may have an older card that will require the 340xx versions of the various NVidia tools. -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Amanda Testing RPMs
It was noted in CentOS Bug 7795 that the amanda package in CentOS does not have dump or xfsdump support: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=7795 I found that it is also like this upstream and they plan to fix it at some point: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140321 In the mean time, I have created 2 sets of RPMs .. one with dump support and one with dump and xfsdump support: Dump Only: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/c7-amanda/dump-only/ Dump and XFSDump: http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/c7-amanda/xfs-support/ If we can get some people who actually use amanda to check these files and feedback into the CentOS Bug (7795 link above), we might help the RHEL team with deciding how to compile the fix (with dump only or dump and xfsdump support). Please feedback to the CentOS-Devel mailing list or bug 7795. NOTE: These RPMs should work, but they are not signed and should be considered testing quality at present .. so not production ready without user testing at this point. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Custom user profile for GNOME 3?
Hi, I wonder where - and eventually how - GNOME 3 stores its user preferences. I'd like to create a custom user profile, with slightly different settings than the default ones: * don't show home folder on ~/Desktop * don't show Trash * use custom default wallpaper * stretch wallpaper instead of zooming * use different default icon theme * etc. Until now I've done this successfully with desktop environments like GNOME 2, Xfce or KDE. I just copied over the relevant files from ~/.config, ~/.kde4 (IIRC), ~/.gconf or whatever to /etc/skel, and newly created users had their settings ready. Anybody knows how I can manage this with GNOME 3? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 121, Issue 1
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CEBA-2015:0273 CentOS 6 ksh BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CEBA-2015:0274 CentOS 6 ruby BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CEEA-2015:0277 CentOS 6 cyrus-imapd Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
4. CEEA-2015:0275 CentOS 5 cyrus-imapd Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:21:48 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0273 CentOS 6 ksh BugFix Update
Message-ID: 20150302122148.ga32...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0273
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0273.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
1b18a7ba2e3dfd59515f0d722a92cf970474bb1d4b4be5014bbd30050f90c5a4
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b7fa412e41427c37a6bc017787ba5904bceee292e9e583b4b53f67353e43dff6
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fd62e15f6e729922a78ed7c883041dc2267ce380fabd25575c5d467d033d5043
ksh-20120801-21.el6_6.2.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:22:15 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0274 CentOS 6 ruby BugFix Update
Message-ID: 20150302122215.ga32...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0274
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0274.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
71234f9406eca6a41884cbaaff642485e10e0a031e300e1d054453e9cfb14ff8
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
b3163be4b0290781509741fe40c3f31d590507101a8a49a874f52cc3481ebb0b
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
ed32c82f71478c9ff251d81d48db568b90371e067b67090dc611018a80cdc32b
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
f074916f420a394ff4f6e102dfbd0264896630817e70c25ae122cb4662b25cc5
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
99c696d220f88578b9ac908c52d7c7d50fc1cde62f5b90beaff61a2cabb7d55b
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
95043fecd149c116e7596fecdef5765e2518f38e56f192b73d5d7435acd3951a
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
3e070909710e9329b92b570c6128057122d2b1c04a97a62a8ac8a47bc9e79ed7
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
1d80cda61fc8cd6f4d65ce605197b71ed8d774d5006c702bee281988203636fb
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
bee5cf1fd558d263b3cafff8c1d28abf2fdfb64f84cf552002e2b30dce443f29
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
760db1ec22721384125263dc7d4f8f5e74d6d6cb1867659e17e6a8fdbc5726b2
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
b3163be4b0290781509741fe40c3f31d590507101a8a49a874f52cc3481ebb0b
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
0821dea5d7e3d79c9b8faa01275706d411f61a846bc78d94e305da06f46d6585
ruby-devel-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
542442bc6e620e6c11bd0ea9a49c0e1dc7e16ac57a0b76bd1f8b1543e43b0c1a
ruby-docs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
e04c1fc17afdfd29e1e23d788c47715894b553cc90318e4146d3d93d65a0cf3a
ruby-irb-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
99c696d220f88578b9ac908c52d7c7d50fc1cde62f5b90beaff61a2cabb7d55b
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.i686.rpm
b473a43d5c201bf9706ab1cbe2d6ef0fc1a6042295e20753d8307326b2fce116
ruby-libs-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
93b3e1baf539d598efe1a1ab094e6718d10472947086ca7e89638615c8b57dbd
ruby-rdoc-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
f2d677239f26999f710bb228e57525a64ab0b95f3b9ec2e384daa1b5b1569a26
ruby-ri-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
e5cd12caa438960187e3c724592de30ff80cc9e14ebf9b3c5a0fe3ab9550ff6d
ruby-static-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
9dbe206d541870495944580e18247031fc0873f33b2711d19aa2ccaaed1b559c
ruby-tcltk-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
d59e8ddea5341b50b411253dd5b5c9975038a9b880a12d9675ebb4b7b71ec8e1
ruby-1.8.7.374-4.el6_6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 3
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 12:23:00 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEEA-2015:0277 CentOS 6 cyrus-imapd
Enhancement Update
Message-ID:
[CentOS] Ignorant question on SSL certs
I'm getting endless complaints about my dovecot cert, /etc/pki/dovecot/certs/dovecot.pem which I created years ago following the dovecot instructions. Do I really have to use a separate cert and key for dovecot? Can I not use the standard cert in /etc/pki/tls/certs (and key) from CACert.org ? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
