Re: [CentOS] xfs fsck error metadata corruption

2015-03-24 Thread Александр Кириллов

Everytime I restart Centos 7 I receive a error saying…

metadata is corrupt

and then I need to go through the process of mount and unmount the
disk uuid then run

xfs_repair {some uuid}
or
xfs_repair -L {some uuid}   which ultimately corrupts even more.


I’m running on a RAID 1 two identical drives


Could be totally irrelevant but once I had serious fs corruption 
problems after hibernation on a Fedora laptop with Intel graphics.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Niki Kovacs

Hi,

I often have to deal with relatively obsolete hardware in schools, 
public libraries, small town halls, etc. I still have a handful of 
CentOS 5.x installations around for these, but I wonder what CentOS 6.x 
desktop specs are, e. g. the minimum requirements (in terms of CPU and 
RAM) to reasonably run it. Will a battered first-generation P-IV with 
512 MB RAM be sufficient? How much RAM does 6.x's graphical installer 
require to even start? Or is it better to opt for CentOS 5.x on this 
sort of dinosaur?


Cheers,

Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside http://cloud.centos.org/

2015-03-24 Thread Ryan Qian
Thanks, I just use qemu-nbd mount the image, and modified the shadow file.

Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone.
From: Nux!‎
Sent: 2015年3月24日星期二 3:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Reply To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside 
http://cloud.centos.org/


Hello,

I believe the root password is disabled (also SSH password logins).
What you can do is boot in single user (init=/bin/sh) and unlock the password, 
set a custom password etc.

HTH
Lucian

--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro

- Original Message -
> From: "Ryan Qian" 
> To: centos@centos.org
> Sent: Monday, 23 March, 2015 14:26:07
> Subject: [CentOS] default password of centos 7 images inside  
> http://cloud.centos.org/

> Hi, I'm trying to to use the centos 7 images provided by
> http://cloud.centos.org/, this works fine when using centos user to ssh in 
> with
> keys, but I'm trying to create a new image base on it, so does it have default
> password I can use to login to the console, before I can configure the network
> setting inside.
>
>
> Thanks!
> -Ryan
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread John R Pierce

On 3/24/2015 12:19 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote:
I often have to deal with relatively obsolete hardware in schools, 
public libraries, small town halls, etc. I still have a handful of 
CentOS 5.x installations around for these, but I wonder what CentOS 
6.x desktop specs are, e. g. the minimum requirements (in terms of CPU 
and RAM) to reasonably run it. Will a battered first-generation P-IV 
with 512 MB RAM be sufficient? How much RAM does 6.x's graphical 
installer require to even start? Or is it better to opt for CentOS 5.x 
on this sort of dinosaur?


I'd be looking at something like TinyLinux or DamnSmallLinux on those.


--
john, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] how to add service at boot up

2015-03-24 Thread robert

Hi there,
I am used to traditional update-rc.d et all.

Now I wonder how to add a a script that used to called by init.d (wit 
start/sop ..) to the new "service start xx" regime.


All the tutorials I found talk about how to use update-rc.d..

thanks
robert
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to add service at boot up

2015-03-24 Thread Earl A Ramirez
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 08:36 +0100, robert wrote:
> Hi there,
> I am used to traditional update-rc.d et all.
> 
> Now I wonder how to add a a script that used to called by init.d (wit 
> start/sop ..) to the new "service start xx" regime.
> 
> All the tutorials I found talk about how to use update-rc.d..
> 
> thanks
> robert
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

For CentOS 6
chkconfig  on

For CentOS 7
systemctl enable 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] really nice squid bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Eero Volotinen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202858

affects also on centos?

--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] how to add service at boot up

2015-03-24 Thread John R Pierce

On 3/24/2015 12:36 AM, robert wrote:

Hi there,
I am used to traditional update-rc.d et all.

Now I wonder how to add a a script that used to called by init.d (wit 
start/sop ..) to the new "service start xx" regime.


All the tutorials I found talk about how to use update-rc.d..


are you talking about systemd services in RHEL 7 ?

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/System_Administrators_Guide/sect-Managing_Services_with_systemd-Unit_Files.html#sect-Managing_Services_with_systemd-Unit_File_Create

short version:
you create a 'unit file' like /etc/systemd/system/servicename.service, 
it has a few options in .ini file format to start and stop your 
service  then you tell systemd to reload daemons, and enable your 
new service.




--
john, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] really nice squid bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck


Eero Volotinen  a écrit :


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202858

affects also on centos?


As CentOS aims to be (is ?) 100% RHEL compatible, it’s bug for bug  
compatible too, AFAIK.


Laurent.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Niki Kovacs

Le 24/03/2015 08:34, John R Pierce a écrit :

I'd be looking at something like TinyLinux or DamnSmallLinux on those.


I don't want anything else than CentOS for the job.

I used to install my own heavily customized version of Slackware on 
these machines (http://www.microlinux.fr/slackware/), but this was a bit 
of a hassle to maintain.


CentOS 5.x is running perfectly well on these old PC's. My question was 
more about what the 6.x installer needs to start. Once the base system 
is installed, I know how to configure a lightweight desktop.


Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Ashish Yadav
Hi,

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Niki Kovacs  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I often have to deal with relatively obsolete hardware in schools, public
> libraries, small town halls, etc. I still have a handful of CentOS 5.x
> installations around for these, but I wonder what CentOS 6.x desktop specs
> are, e. g. the minimum requirements (in terms of CPU and RAM) to reasonably
> run it. Will a battered first-generation P-IV with 512 MB RAM be
> sufficient? How much RAM does 6.x's graphical installer require to even
> start? Or is it better to opt for CentOS 5.x on this sort of dinosaur?
>

Try considering Bodhi and Puppy Linux also.

--Regards
Ashishkumar S. Yadav
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Phil Wyett
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 09:38 +0100, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> Le 24/03/2015 08:34, John R Pierce a écrit :
> > I'd be looking at something like TinyLinux or DamnSmallLinux on those.
> 
> I don't want anything else than CentOS for the job.
> 
> I used to install my own heavily customized version of Slackware on 
> these machines (http://www.microlinux.fr/slackware/), but this was a bit 
> of a hassle to maintain.
> 
> CentOS 5.x is running perfectly well on these old PC's. My question was 
> more about what the 6.x installer needs to start. Once the base system 
> is installed, I know how to configure a lightweight desktop.
> 
> Niki
> 

Hi,

RHEL version min/max specs can be found:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits

Regards

Phil

-- 
Twitter: @philwyett
Jabber (xmpp): philwy...@jappix.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Niki Kovacs

Le 24/03/2015 09:45, Ashish Yadav a écrit :

Try considering Bodhi and Puppy Linux also.


Thanks but no. As I already stated, I have my own blend of Slackware for 
this. My question was: I want to install CentOS (and not $OTHER_DISTRO) 
on these machines, so what are the minimum specs?


--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Niki Kovacs

Le 24/03/2015 09:52, Phil Wyett a écrit :

RHEL version min/max specs can be found:

https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits


Thanks! That's exactly the document I was looking for.

Cheers,

Niki

--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Web  : http://www.microlinux.fr
Mail : i...@microlinux.fr
Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] really nice squid bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:41:58 +0200
Eero Volotinen  wrote:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202858
> 
> affects also on centos?

Bugs in internal, non-released, rh packages don't really affect centos,
no.

/Peter
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

2015-03-24 Thread James Pearson

muiz wrote:

Hi, James,
 The file system is xfs  (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs  1891292900 
1556745108 334547792  83% /home)


XFS has a low limit on the number of entries in an ACL (about 20)

However, I don't know why you are getting the error 'Argument list too 
long' - I get 'Operation not permitted' when I try to and an entry that 
goes over the limit ...


I believe more recent versions of the XFS code support more ACL entries 
(may be more recent than that used by RHEL/CentOS 7 ?)


James Pearson
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] really nice squid bug?

2015-03-24 Thread Laurent Wandrebeck


Peter Kjellström  a écrit :


On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 09:41:58 +0200
Eero Volotinen  wrote:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202858

affects also on centos?


Bugs in internal, non-released, rh packages don't really affect centos,
no.


Agreed, I didn’t catch it was about the not yet released 6.7. be it RH  
or CentOS.


Laurent.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 121, Issue 9

2015-03-24 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. CESA-2015:0715 Moderate CentOS 6 openssl Security Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   2. CEBA-2015:0710 CentOS 6 time FASTTRACK BugFix Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   3. CEBA-2015:0712 CentOS 6 pam_passwdqc FASTTRACKBugFix Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   4. CEBA-2015:0711 CentOS 6 mgetty FASTTRACK BugFix   Update
  (Johnny Hughes)
   5. CEEA-2015:0717 CentOS 6 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)
   6. CEEA-2015:0717 CentOS 5 tzdata Enhancement Update (Johnny Hughes)


--

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:40:40 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:0715 Moderate CentOS 6 openssl
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20150323204040.ga6...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:0715 Moderate

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0715.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
3fa78f468398664806f16f1b47f04eeb49c3c86b6a7c6493a1e9c4e34e5eed92  
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
f3e22401b70e87353c2370f04d1e1e6d9d68c22d22e6f37d3de46c0221d9caa8  
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
d2e48d5f643899214375f04c1fc7177ea58e8aac6c72f0e087d12169d9350b98  
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
54800272b5af00b33b56e02a29673e3e758a2d94487651de695a1f3218be6828  
openssl-static-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm

x86_64:
3fa78f468398664806f16f1b47f04eeb49c3c86b6a7c6493a1e9c4e34e5eed92  
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
7b65b7535e4cd05b943f65dddb7d0e82400dc3c5f18e4b92ab2c643d68a4350e  
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
f3e22401b70e87353c2370f04d1e1e6d9d68c22d22e6f37d3de46c0221d9caa8  
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.i686.rpm
4625cdf94388f9c084431c090f8144cc54b35fe8769e5bb6066561fdf5a6db40  
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
7b1e6806b4eef12865276f923c2961673fed52d374d9402327d9eb04ad085d0b  
openssl-perl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm
78e420e5366a8b7c96c93a07d49f49b85f6ca0ce81b4f5c599871b0b22c81d03  
openssl-static-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.x86_64.rpm

Source:
fd5e9e6f279085a3537edfe8e464b8bae758aace31b2d6fb37ccbdcf00138c3a  
openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.7.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:41:41 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0710 CentOS 6 time FASTTRACK
BugFix  Update
Message-ID: <20150323204141.ga6...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0710 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0710.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
18e807acc9d6c9ec8627e5e3931ffdeefbfc1a24e733fefd24e0f503288d1859  
time-1.7-38.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
ba08bcabe3a3da5f45779dedc1bc88ebe2f4cb4c894b3db49a332755689a589c  
time-1.7-38.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
7f0750d3bf102db7e54f93345786cf256e1ef4bfdd786d4290625010c9bf5af0  
time-1.7-38.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net



--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:42:12 +
From: Johnny Hughes 
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:0712 CentOS 6 pam_passwdqc
FASTTRACK   BugFix Update
Message-ID: <20150323204212.ga7...@n04.lon1.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:0712 

Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0712.html

The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently 
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) 

i386:
86b26ba5195d5f022d0b5756bf1ff01ed007703ac5e69995483c28e51e0b261f  
pam_passwdqc-1.0.5-8.el6.i686.rpm

x86_64:
86b26ba5195d5f022d0b5756bf1ff01ed007703ac5e69995483c28e51e0b261f  
pam_passwdqc-1.0.5-8.el6.i686.rpm
dad8c6003bc37cfa40c11700ba5e61e2d45dd27f6469087de98b335be53585da  
pam_passwdqc-1.0.5-8.el6.x86_64.rpm

Source:
d5f60315d8560aad15cde53e82f44559d861dd2e9965ea6f0e60b90aa601192b  
pam_passwdqc-1.0.5-8.el6.src.rpm



-- 
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.f

Re: [CentOS] error building php spec file

2015-03-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hi Ashish,


Which CentOS version you using?
> If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS
> repo which has latest php packages.
> Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6.
> 
>


I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7 from
IUS that way. But also I'm trying to get better at building RPM's. So if
anybody has any advice on how to solve this problem, I'd appreciate
anything you'd have to say!

Thanks
Tim


On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Ashish Yadav  wrote:

> Hi.
>
> Which CentOS version you using?
>
> If it is CentOS 6 then instead of building it from source, you can use IUS
> repo which has latest php packages.
>
> Below is the link for the packages in IUS repo for CentOS 6.
>
> 
>
> --Regards
> Ashishkumar S. Yadav
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Tim Dunphy  wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> >  I'm attempting to build a spec file of php 5.6.7 - the latest stable -
> > into an rpm. And it's failing with this set of errors:
> >
> > Processing files: php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64
> > warning: File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm
> > error: Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar ->
> >
> >
> /home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar
> > warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php-cgi.1.gz
> > warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php-config.1.gz
> > warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php.1.gz
> > warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/phpize.1.gz
> >
> >
> > RPM build errors:
> > File listed twice: /etc/rc.d/init.d/php-fpm
> > Symlink points to BuildRoot: /usr/bin/phar ->
> >
> >
> /home/bluethundr/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/php-5.6.7-1.el7.x86_64/usr/bin/phar.phar
> > File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php-cgi.1.gz
> > File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php-config.1.gz
> > File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/php.1.gz
> > File listed twice: /usr/share/man/man1/phpize.1.gz
> >
> >
> > It's claiming the files above are listed twice. However I don't see
> that''s
> > the case at all in the spec file. Here it is:
> >
> >
> > [bluethundr@repo SPECS]$ cat php.spec
> > Name:   php
> > Version:5.6.7
> > Release:1%{?dist}
> > Summary:PHP is a widely-used general-purpose scripting language.
> >
> > Group:  Development/Languages
> > License:PHP License v3.01
> > URL:http://www.php.net
> > Source0:http://www.php.net/distributions/php-%{version}.tar.bz2
> > BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
> >
> > Obsoletes:  php
> >
> > %description
> > PHP is a widely-used general-purpose scripting language that is
> especially
> > suited for Web development and can be embedded into HTML.
> >
> > %prep
> > %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}
> > %build
> > EXTENSION_DIR=%{_libdir}/php/modules; export EXTENSION_DIR
> > %configure --with-layout=GNU --with-libdir=lib64 --with-enchant \
> > --enable-fpm --with-gd --enable-intl --enable-mbstring --enable-pcntl \
> > --enable-soap --enable-sockets --enable-sqlite-utf8 --enable-zip
> > --with-zlib \
> > --with-curl --with-jpeg-dir --with-png-dir --with-zlib-dir
> --with-gettext \
> > --with-mcrypt --with-mysql=mysqlnd --with-mysqli=mysqlnd
> > --with-pdo-mysql=mysqlnd \
> > --with-pdo-sqlite --with-tidy --with-pear=%{_datadir}/php/pear
> > --disable-debug
> >
> > make %{?_smp_mflags}
> >
> > %install
> > rm -rf %{buildroot}
> > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}
> > install -Dp -m0755 sapi/fpm/init.d.php-fpm.in
> > %{buildroot}%{_initrddir}/php-fpm
> > %{__make} install INSTALL_ROOT="%{buildroot}"
> >
> > %clean
> > rm -rf %{buildroot}
> >
> > %post
> > %/sbin/chkconfig php-fpm on
> >
> > %preun
> > if [ "$1" = 0 ] ; then
> > /sbin/service php-fpm stop > /dev/null 2>&
> > /sbin/chkconfig --del php-fpm
> > fi
> > exit 0
> >
> > %postun
> > if [ "$1" -ge 1 ]; then
> > /sbin/service php-fpm condrestart > /dev/null 2>&
> > fi
> > exit 0
> >
> > %files
> > %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> > %{_bindir}/*
> > %{_sbindir}/*
> > %{_includedir}/*
> > %{_libdir}/*
> > %{_mandir}/man1/php*
> > %{_sysconfdir}/*
> > %{_datadir}/*
> > %{_initrddir}/*
> > %exclude /.channels
> > %exclude /.depdb
> > %exclude /.depdblock
> > %exclude /.filemap
> > %exclude /.lock
> >
> > %changelog
> > * Mon Mar 23 2015 Mike Willbanks  - 5.3.8-1
> > - Updated to 5.3.8
> > * Mon Mar 23 2015 Mike Willbanks  - 5.3.5-1
> > - Initial Package
> >
> > I tried to build the package by going to the SPECS directory in my
> > buildroot and issuing the command: rpmbuild -ba php.spec
> >
> > Can anyone point out where I'm going wrong?
> >
> > Thanks!!
> > Tim
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > GPG me!!
> >
> > gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
> > ___
> > C

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Timothy Murphy
Phil Wyett wrote:

> RHEL version min/max specs can be found:
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits

Ignorant question: what does POWER mean in these tables?

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
gayleard /at/ eircom.net
School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.x desktop specs: minimum requirements

2015-03-24 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 04:04:03PM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Phil Wyett wrote:
> 
> > RHEL version min/max specs can be found:
> > 
> > https://access.redhat.com/articles/rhel-limits
> 
> Ignorant question: what does POWER mean in these tables?

I believe that would be the IBM POWER series of chips, PowerPC, et al.

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   Show me your ways, O LORD, teach me your paths;
 Guide me in your truth and teach me,
 for you are God my Savior,
And my hope is in you all day long.
-- Psalm 25:4-5 (NIV) 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] error building php spec file

2015-03-24 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby

On 03/24/2015 05:38 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7 
from IUS that way. But also I'm trying to get better at building 
RPM's. So if anybody has any advice on how to solve this problem, I'd 
appreciate anything you'd have to say!


Take the IUS src.rpm, install it, and get inspiration from its specfile.
You'll learn by example.

Hope this helps.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] error building php spec file

2015-03-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
>
> Take the IUS src.rpm, install it, and get inspiration from its specfile.
> You'll learn by example.
>
> Hope this helps.


Sure! That's great advice! Thank you!!

Tim

On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby <
mihamina.rakotomandi...@rktmb.org> wrote:

> On 03/24/2015 05:38 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>
>> I'm using CentOS 7. I'll check to see if I can get php version 5.6.7 from
>> IUS that way. But also I'm trying to get better at building RPM's. So if
>> anybody has any advice on how to solve this problem, I'd appreciate
>> anything you'd have to say!
>>
>
> Take the IUS src.rpm, install it, and get inspiration from its specfile.
> You'll learn by example.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

2015-03-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:30 PM, Akemi Yagi  wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Gordon Messmer  
> wrote:
>> On 03/06/2015 01:41 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>
>>> I just want the package revisions for at least the kernel and tzdata*
>>> files and anything else where previously-found bugs related to the
>>> leap second have been fixed.
>>
>>
>> https://access.redhat.com/articles/15145
>
> In addition to that article, the following one was updated recently:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/articles/199563
> ("Are we susceptible to a leap second event?")
>

Still way tl;dnr material.  Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest
kernel version for each Centos version  you could be running and still
avoid known problems?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] AWOL rpm

2015-03-24 Thread Ali Corbin
About a month ago I did an upgrade of glibc on one of our test centos5
systems.  And yum happily gave me about 8 packages, including both
bitted-nesses of glibc-common.

This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc.  And he
found that yum wouldn't give him
glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm.

So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and
couldn't find it either.  Not in the x86_64 tree anyway.

Did that package disappear on purpose?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] AWOL rpm

2015-03-24 Thread Stephen Harris
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Ali Corbin wrote:
> This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc.  And he
> found that yum wouldn't give him
> glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm.
> 
> So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and
> couldn't find it either.  Not in the x86_64 tree anyway.

It's in the updates tree for i386:
eg
http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm

There's no i386 version in the x86_64 tree because it doesn't have any
librarie, just binaries (eg /usr/bin/getent) and non-architecture files
(eg locale, defaults).

(Basically, don't install this on a 64bit machine!!)

-- 

rgds
Stephen
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

2015-03-24 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:56:27 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:

> Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest
> kernel version for each Centos version  you could be running and still
> avoid known problems?

The best answer to your question is "the latest version", since previous 
versions all have known issues of one kind or another.

It's not a great idea to run outdated Centos systems with known bugs of any 
kind.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] leap second and Centos

2015-03-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Frank Cox  wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 12:56:27 -0500
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Doesn't anyone have a list of the oldest
>> kernel version for each Centos version  you could be running and still
>> avoid known problems?
>
> The best answer to your question is "the latest version", since previous 
> versions all have known issues of one kind or another.
>
> It's not a great idea to run outdated Centos systems with known bugs of any 
> kind.

I can't argue with that (then again, you were running that buggy code
before and happy with it), but having to reboot frequently is not
ideal either, particularly on machines where scheduling downtime is a
fairly involved process.   I'm looking for the compromise with the
least pain involved.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
  lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] AWOL rpm

2015-03-24 Thread Ali Corbin
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Stephen Harris  wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:56:29AM -0700, Ali Corbin wrote:
>> This morning I was showing a co-worker how to upgrade glibc.  And he
>> found that yum wouldn't give him
>> glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm.
>>
>> So I browsed to the web interface of one of the centos5 mirrors, and
>> couldn't find it either.  Not in the x86_64 tree anyway.
>
> It's in the updates tree for i386:
> eg
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos-5/5/updates/i386/RPMS/glibc-common-2.5-123.el5_11.1.i386.rpm
>
> There's no i386 version in the x86_64 tree because it doesn't have any
> librarie, just binaries (eg /usr/bin/getent) and non-architecture files
> (eg locale, defaults).
>
> (Basically, don't install this on a 64bit machine!!)
>
> --
>
> rgds
> Stephen
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

I thought I saw bunches of libraries in that rpm.
Let me look through my history.
..
Oh, fudge.  That was the devel package I was looking at.
Never mind.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
Hey all,

I'm logged into a CentOS 7 box and trying to install apache. Not having any
luck, as it's not being found. Which is odd, because I have the right repos
enabled:

[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 (Maipo)

[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #yum repolist
Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb
repo id repo name
 status
*epel/x86_64* Extra Packages for Enterprise
Linux 7 - x86_64   7,454
*remi *   Les RPM de remi pour
Enterprise Linux  - x86_64  1,862
*remi-php56 * Les RPM de remi de PHP 5.6
pour Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64277
*rpmforge*RHEL 7Server - RPMforge.net -
dag  245
*webtatic*/x86_64 Webtatic Repository EL7 -
x86_64   325
repolist: 10,163

And when I go to install, this is what I find:

[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #yum install httpd
Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb
No package httpd available.
Error: Nothing to do

Does anyone have any ideas why this is failing?

Thanks,
Tim




-- 
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread Frank Cox
On Tue, 24 Mar 2015 17:59:31 -0400
Tim Dunphy wrote:

> I have the right repos enabled:

Apparently you don't.

> Does anyone have any ideas why this is failing?

I don't see the base or the updates repo listed in your message.

Available Packages
Name: httpd
Arch: x86_64
Version : 2.4.6
Release : 19.el7.centos
Size: 2.7 M
Repo: updates/7/x86_64
Summary : Apache HTTP Server
URL : http://httpd.apache.org/
License : ASL 2.0
Description : The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful, efficient, and extensible
: web server.

As you can see, the latest version of httpd is in the Updates repo.  Try 
installing that repo and then  your system will be able to find httpd.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread John R Pierce

On 3/24/2015 2:59 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote:

[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #yum install httpd
Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb
No package httpd available.
Error: Nothing to do


its in the EL7 Base (and Updates) repositories, which seem to be 
disabled on your system.


btw, I would NOT enable REMI, RPMFORGE *and* EPEL at the same time 
unless you want to get into some gnarly package conflicts.   I don't 
even know what webtatic is...






[root@c7test1 ~]# yum install httpd
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
base | 3.6 kB  00:00:00
epel/x86_64/metalink |  14 kB  00:00:00
epel | 4.4 kB  00:00:00
extras | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
updates | 3.4 kB  00:00:00
(1/2): epel/x86_64/primary_db | 4.0 MB  00:00:01
(2/2): updates/7/x86_64/primary_db | 6.6 MB  00:00:01
(1/2): epel/x86_64/updateinfo | 317 kB  00:00:00
(2/2): epel/x86_64/pkgtags | 1.4 MB  00:00:00
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
 * base: mirror.lax.hugeserver.com
 * epel: linux.mirrors.es.net
 * extras: mirrors.usc.edu
 * updates: mirrors.usc.edu
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.6-19.el7.centos will be installed
--> Processing Dependency: httpd-tools = 2.4.6-19.el7.centos for 
package: httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64

--> Running transaction check
---> Package httpd-tools.x86_64 0:2.4.6-19.el7.centos will be installed
--> Finished Dependency Resolution

Dependencies Resolved

===
 Package Arch Version Repository Size
===
Installing:
 httpd x86_64 2.4.6-19.el7.centos updates   
2.7 M

Installing for dependencies:
 httpd-tools x86_64 2.4.6-19.el7.centos 
updates78 k


Transaction Summary
===
Install  1 Package (+1 Dependent package)

Total download size: 2.8 M
Installed size: 9.5 M
Is this ok [y/d/N]: y
Downloading packages:
(1/2): httpd-tools-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm |  78 kB  00:00:00
(2/2): httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64.rpm | 2.7 MB  00:00:00
---
Total 2.8 MB/s | 2.8 MB  00:00:00
Running transaction check
Running transaction test
Transaction test succeeded
Running transaction
  Installing : httpd-tools-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64 1/2
  Installing : httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64 2/2
  Verifying  : httpd-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64 1/2
  Verifying  : httpd-tools-2.4.6-19.el7.centos.x86_64 2/2

Installed:
  httpd.x86_64 0:2.4.6-19.el7.centos

Dependency Installed:
  httpd-tools.x86_64 0:2.4.6-19.el7.centos

Complete!

--
john, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread Richard


 Original Message 
> Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 17:59:31 -0400
> From: Tim Dunphy 
> To: CentOS mailing list 
> Subject: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7
> 
> I'm logged into a CentOS 7 box and trying to install apache. Not
> having any luck, as it's not being found. Which is odd, because I
> have the right repos enabled:
> 
> [root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #cat /etc/redhat-release
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 (Maipo)


By the way, that's an RHEL-7, not CentOS-7 box -- which is why you
wouldn't have the centos repositories enabled.


   - Richard

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
Ah ok thanks for the clarification.

So I enabled the rhui repositories and now all is well. I was able to get
apache instaslled.

[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #yum repolist
Loaded plugins: amazon-id, rhui-lb
repo id  repo name
  status
epel/x86_64  Extra Packages
for Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64  7,454
remi Les RPM de
remi pour Enterprise Linux  - x86_64 1,862
remi-php56   Les RPM de
remi de PHP 5.6 pour Enterprise Linux 7 - x86_64   277
rhui-REGION-rhel-server-releases/7Server/x86_64  Red Hat
Enterprise Linux Server 7 (RPMs)6,687
rhui-REGION-rhel-server-rh-common/7Server/x86_64 Red Hat
Enterprise Linux Server 7 RH Common (RPMs)116
rpmforge RHEL 7Server -
RPMforge.net - dag 245
repolist: 16,641


[root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #rpmquery -i httpd
httpd-2.4.6-31.el7.x86_64

Webtatic by the way, is actually a very good repo for keeping up with some
web related packages.

https://webtatic.com/projects/yum-repository/

I found out about this at a web shop I worked at a few years ago. Check it
out!

Thanks,
Tim



On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Richard  wrote:

>
>
>  Original Message 
> > Date: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 17:59:31 -0400
> > From: Tim Dunphy 
> > To: CentOS mailing list 
> > Subject: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7
> >
> > I'm logged into a CentOS 7 box and trying to install apache. Not
> > having any luck, as it's not being found. Which is odd, because I
> > have the right repos enabled:
> >
> > [root@hadoop1:/etc/yum.repos.d] #cat /etc/redhat-release
> > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.0 (Maipo)
>
>
> By the way, that's an RHEL-7, not CentOS-7 box -- which is why you
> wouldn't have the centos repositories enabled.
>
>
>- Richard
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>



-- 
GPG me!!

gpg --keyserver pool.sks-keyservers.net --recv-keys F186197B
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] can't do a yum install of apache C7

2015-03-24 Thread Tim Dunphy
Also...

> btw, I would NOT enable REMI, RPMFORGE *and* EPEL at the same time unless you 
> want to get into some gnarly package conflicts.   I don't even know what 
> webtatic is...


Thanks for pointing this out. I'll follow this advice! 

Tim

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 24, 2015, at 6:08 PM, John R Pierce  wrote:
> 
> btw, I would NOT enable REMI, RPMFORGE *and* EPEL at the same time unless you 
> want to get into some gnarly package conflicts.   I don't even know what 
> webtatic is...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

2015-03-24 Thread muiz
Hi, Ashishkumar S. Yadav:


   Total 30 ACL records there ( user, group, mask, default user, default 
group...)
   Now I use  move some users to the specified groups to resolve this problem, 
but I don't want to create too many groups.


Thanks and best regards,
muiz
At 2015-03-24 13:46:05, "Ashish Yadav"  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>How many user's you have assigned on that directory?
>
>
>--Regards
>Ashishkumar S. Yadav
>
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 5:30 AM, muiz  wrote:
>
>> Hi, James,
>>  The file system is xfs  (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs  1891292900
>> 1556745108 334547792  83% /home)
>>
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>> Muiz
>>
>> At 2015-03-23 19:36:02, "James Pearson" 
>> wrote:
>> >muiz wrote:
>> >> Dear all,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control.
>> >>  There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new
>> user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> [root@s1 abc]# getfacl /abc
>> >> # file: abc
>> >> # owner: root
>> >> # group: root
>> >> user::rwx
>> >> user:user01:---
>> >> user:user02:---
>> >> user:user03:---
>> >> ...
>> >> user:user25:---
>> >> group::r-x
>> >> mask::r-x
>> >> other::r-x
>> >> [root@s1 abc]# setfacl -m u:user30:rwx /abc
>> >> setfacl: .: Argument list too long
>> >> [root@s1 abc]#
>> >
>> >What file system are you using?
>> >
>> >James Pearson
>> >___
>> >CentOS mailing list
>> >CentOS@centos.org
>> >http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> CentOS@centos.org
>> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

2015-03-24 Thread muiz
 Thanks john and Ashishkumar S. Yadav.


   Now I use  move some users to the specified groups to resolve this problem, 
but I don't want to create too many groups.


Thanks and regards,
Muiz

At 2015-03-24 13:59:44, "Ashish Yadav"  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 11:22 AM, John R Pierce  wrote:
>
>> On 3/19/2015 6:14 PM, muiz wrote:
>>
>>>   I have a Centos 6 (64bit) server used for samba and ACL control.
>>>   There has a folder which a lot of user can access, when I add a new
>>> user's ACL, but failed, do you know how to resolve this problem?
>>>
>>
>> put all those users in a group, and delete all the user ACLs on that
>> directory, just add the single group ACL
>
>
>This is a nice way to do. Totally agreed.
>
>--Regards
>Ashishkumar S. Yadav
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 6: setfacl: .: Argument list too long

2015-03-24 Thread muiz
Hi, James,


This is the first time I use XFS. That folder has 30 ACL entries.


Thanks and regards,
Muiz

At 2015-03-24 18:44:14, "James Pearson"  wrote:
>muiz wrote:
>> Hi, James,
>>  The file system is xfs  (/dev/mapper/centos-home xfs  1891292900 
>> 1556745108 334547792  83% /home)
>
>XFS has a low limit on the number of entries in an ACL (about 20)
>
>However, I don't know why you are getting the error 'Argument list too 
>long' - I get 'Operation not permitted' when I try to and an entry that 
>goes over the limit ...
>
>I believe more recent versions of the XFS code support more ACL entries 
>(may be more recent than that used by RHEL/CentOS 7 ?)
>
>James Pearson
>___
>CentOS mailing list
>CentOS@centos.org
>http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos