Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt 1.2.15 and Kernel 3.18.12 RPMs pushed to the Xen4
Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: I have signed and pushed the libvirt-1.2.15-3 and kenel-3.18.12-11 RPMs into the xen4 repository for CentOS-6.6. These have been in virt6-testing for a few months now with no negative reports. Kernel 3.18.12-11 failed to boot on a Dell PowerEdge R620 - unable to start init, but restarted immediately after and I'm not currently able to test more. -- Antti Salmela ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
Am 16.07.2015 um 02:22 schrieb Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu: On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? We use Bareos extensively. By default, Bareos is Bacula-compatible. We use Bareos extensively. What is the story between bareos and bacula? And why you prefer bareos as opposed to bacula. Just curios: I use bacula (it is bacula 5, server is FreeBSD, clients are CentOS 5,6,7, FreeBSD 9,10, Windows 7). Thanks for your insights! I personally prefer bacula. For more informations about the case above look at: http://blog.bacula.org/category/kerns-blog/ http://blog.bacula.org/category/status-reports/ http://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/33199834/ -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On 16.07.2015 11:36, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 16.07.2015 um 02:22 schrieb Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu: On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? We use Bareos extensively. By default, Bareos is Bacula-compatible. We use Bareos extensively. What is the story between bareos and bacula? And why you prefer bareos as opposed to bacula. Just curios: I use bacula (it is bacula 5, server is FreeBSD, clients are CentOS 5,6,7, FreeBSD 9,10, Windows 7). Thanks for your insights! I personally prefer bacula. For more informations about the case above look at: http://blog.bacula.org/category/kerns-blog/ http://blog.bacula.org/category/status-reports/ http://sourceforge.net/p/bacula/mailman/message/33199834/ I've tried bacula/bareos and they are horribly outdated in how they approach backups and only really useful if you use tape backups (because that's the only target they were designed for). I've found obnam to be a good solution as it is lightweight, does de-deduplication (no full/incremental/differential nonsense) and can backup any sftp source. It's not perfect but the best tools I've found so far. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt 1.2.15 and Kernel 3.18.12 RPMs pushed to the Xen4
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 10:36 AM, Antti Salmela asalm...@iki.fi wrote: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: I have signed and pushed the libvirt-1.2.15-3 and kenel-3.18.12-11 RPMs into the xen4 repository for CentOS-6.6. These have been in virt6-testing for a few months now with no negative reports. Kernel 3.18.12-11 failed to boot on a Dell PowerEdge R620 - unable to start init, but restarted immediately after and I'm not currently able to test more. Thanks for the report, but that's not much to go on. If you get a chance to make a more complete description of your system, and boot / serial logs if available, as well as whether the kernel was able to boot native or not. Thanks, -George ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On 15-07-15 19:22:04, Valeri Galtsev wrote: What is the story between bareos and bacula? FYI: https://www.bareos.org/en/faq/items/why_fork.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 125, Issue 6
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest...
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2015:1230 Important CentOS 5 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security
Update (Johnny Hughes)
2. CESA-2015:1229 Critical CentOS 7 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security
Update (Johnny Hughes)
3. CESA-2015:1228 Important CentOS 7 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
Update (Johnny Hughes)
4. CESA-2015:1221 Moderate CentOS 6 kernel Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
5. CEEA-2015:1227 CentOS 6 mmc_core_dup Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
6. CEEA-2015:1227 CentOS 6 rtsx_usb Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
7. CEEA-2015:1227 CentOS 6 rtsx_usb_sdmmcEnhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
8. CEEA-2015:1227 CentOS 6 mmc_block_dup Enhancement Update
(Johnny Hughes)
9. CESA-2015:1229 Critical CentOS 6 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security
Update (Johnny Hughes)
10. CESA-2015:1228 Important CentOS 6 java-1.8.0-openjdk Security
Update (Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:39:22 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1230 Important CentOS 5
java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update
Message-ID: 20150715153922.ga25...@chakra.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1230 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1230.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
d71f7f7a602aeb59a3fcd9da99c242f875daed2a0cfe36d62cda2c86be9c1f20
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.i386.rpm
83ad29eb9d2fc0389997bb8ef24e568919d54de3aa3847f5645e9fd294fdf898
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.i386.rpm
10bbe4b168bee586cb3ab478d244ea52129ddc18d77802aef85585a5cf34351d
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.i386.rpm
ca5a02b3b3698d573997556bcd1dea8662eb20c9fecce004e33bdf2a10c25aab
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.i386.rpm
1e9db65a427ce260903abad8d19d641a312347a5ac8008403fbf70664e43396e
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.i386.rpm
x86_64:
4c8ff4996bcee35e40b8039e060a4a80ab01a69059fe0d5e2ac3f4e2de4d881c
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
66eba15a99a63f9f5c94e87a6896eaa30451028a5fe80d0a3b58577c38c02d30
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
7a3b0749b1bf46b435210848c171c2947fd3e234e855c49674e7bb950ca2d653
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
f9087cfb383365eebfef0de8c926719a65b95bb0bcc10d94dd333b55163bd537
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
f4f59477bb5c0935e90e53a6400595be099a0065edac84674dc25d460498a04e
java-1.7.0-openjdk-src-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.x86_64.rpm
Source:
dd8aa9c54b915197d6e7db329647ea80a456c2701056c5cc813fa3c3e88f309f
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.3.el5_11.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
--
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 15:26:50 +
From: Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:1229 Critical CentOS 7
java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update
Message-ID: 20150715152650.ga61...@n04.lon1.karan.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1229 Critical
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1229.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
9cf0a8b1c305a6056d2081668fc3bd95cce27ba7e55e3225f19341c1de1150a6
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
b8c3b3c0d67264f33fd750ad2201e5dafd8b3e30b3d706d4394d067dd631d18a
java-1.7.0-openjdk-accessibility-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
2111dc95cfb010164fe8035e7cc1aa4a343c2d4edb8f9fb6a2f7a6f81e0e9501
java-1.7.0-openjdk-demo-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
548faf4a1cc2a0fe5bc17153fb04ffb0338f2598fb7e0f5738c6452e024b6c45
java-1.7.0-openjdk-devel-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
2e622ded8474bf129f99a6a4f91d0b93aad2db0050d0770fe5d7cacd3f87a462
java-1.7.0-openjdk-headless-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.x86_64.rpm
15c8ce1fc0aeed79f95828fde02164f8f976e0fe822b4cef4f568f8a22ad18d0
java-1.7.0-openjdk-javadoc-1.7.0.85-2.6.1.2.el7_1.noarch.rpm
Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt 1.2.15 and Kernel 3.18.12 RPMs pushed to the Xen4
On 06/29/2015 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: I have signed and pushed the libvirt-1.2.15-3 and kenel-3.18.12-11 RPMs into the xen4 repository for CentOS-6.6. These have been in virt6-testing for a few months now with no negative reports. Is there any intent to keep that 3.18 kernel up to date with security patches, or is it just intended for testing? -- Bob Nichols NOSPAM is really part of my email address. Do NOT delete it. ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS-virt] Libvirt 1.2.15 and Kernel 3.18.12 RPMs pushed to the Xen4
On 07/16/2015 07:19 AM, Robert Nichols wrote: On 06/29/2015 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: I have signed and pushed the libvirt-1.2.15-3 and kenel-3.18.12-11 RPMs into the xen4 repository for CentOS-6.6. These have been in virt6-testing for a few months now with no negative reports. Is there any intent to keep that 3.18 kernel up to date with security patches, or is it just intended for testing? We will be maintaining a 3.18.x kernel from the kernel.org LTS branch .. so there will be updates as they are released. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
[CentOS] was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos
I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as no games.) Is there some default setup for this scenario? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as no games.) Is there some default setup for this scenario? Never mind. More googling found it. Anyone know if this will ever make it into one of the std. repos, or is there a lawsuit ongoing, or? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]
No ongoing lawsuit, AFAIK. I use their upstream repos just fine. Oh, and I don't use tape. I use the File and GlusterFile storage types, which work great. Gluster's a great fit, because of how easy it is to expand your storage dedicated to backups. Just add another brick or two... On Thu, Jul 16, 2015, 5:46 PM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as no games.) Is there some default setup for this scenario? Never mind. More googling found it. Anyone know if this will ever make it into one of the std. repos, or is there a lawsuit ongoing, or? mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
