Re: [CentOS] Firefix 60.10-5 ESR Install Problems For CentOS 6
On 07/13/2018 03:03 PM, Paul E. Virgo wrote: > Johnny/et al, > > Looks like we've run into some issues with incompatible libs for the new > Firefox 60 ESR install: > >> root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# yum -y update firefox >> Loaded plugins: list-data, security >> Setting up Update Process >> group-centos-adobe | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-bigfix | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-epel | 3.0 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-extras | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-gbase | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-os | 3.6 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-salt | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-updates | 3.4 kB 00:00 >> Resolving Dependencies >> --> Running transaction check >> ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.8.0-1.el6.centos will be updated >> ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:60.1.0-5.el6.centos will be an update >> --> Processing Dependency: nss >= 3.36.0 for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Processing Dependency: nspr >= 4.19.0 for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Processing Dependency: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: nspr >= 4.19.0 >> Installed: nspr-4.13.1-1.el6.x86_64 (@group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.13.1-1.el6 >> Available: nspr-4.10.6-1.el6_5.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.10.6-1.el6_5 >> Available: nspr-4.10.8-1.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.10.8-1.el6_6 >> Available: nspr-4.10.8-2.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nspr = 4.10.8-2.el6_7 >> Available: nspr-4.11.0-0.1.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nspr = 4.11.0-0.1.el6_7 >> Available: nspr-4.11.0-1.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.11.0-1.el6 >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: nss >= 3.36.0 >> Installed: nss-3.28.4-4.el6_9.x86_64 (@group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-4.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.16.1-14.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.16.1-14.el6 >> Available: nss-3.18.0-5.3.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.18.0-5.3.el6_6 >> Available: nss-3.21.0-8.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.21.0-8.el6 >> Available: nss-3.27.1-13.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.27.1-13.el6 >> Available: nss-3.28.3-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.3-3.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-1.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.28.4-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-3.el6_9 >> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem >> You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest >> root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# > This is occurring on all of our CentOS 6.9 workstations. Any advice? > Thanks. > > PEV > It requires CentOS-6.10 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 + MATE : Folder contents not refreshed in file manager
On 2018-07-09, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I just migrated my workstation running CentOS 7 from KDE to MATE. > > It looks like I'm having the same problem with the Caja file manager > than with Dolphin. Folder contents don't get refreshed automatically, > and I have to hit F5. > > For example, when I download a file (say, a compressed archive) from > the Internet, I have to hit F5 to see the file in Caja. And when I > extract the archive, I have to hit F5 again. > > Anybody knows where this nagging problem comes from? > > Cheers, > > Niki What do you see in /proc/sys/fs/inotify/max_user_watches? If you increase the value, does the problem persist? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefix 60.10-5 ESR Install Problems For CentOS 6
On 13/07/18 22:03, Paul E. Virgo wrote: > Johnny/et al, > > Looks like we've run into some issues with incompatible libs for the new > Firefox 60 ESR install: > >> root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# yum -y update firefox >> Loaded plugins: list-data, security >> Setting up Update Process >> group-centos-adobe | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-bigfix | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-epel | 3.0 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-extras | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-gbase | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-os | 3.6 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-salt | 2.9 kB 00:00 >> group-centos-updates | 3.4 kB 00:00 >> Resolving Dependencies >> --> Running transaction check >> ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.8.0-1.el6.centos will be updated >> ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:60.1.0-5.el6.centos will be an update >> --> Processing Dependency: nss >= 3.36.0 for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Processing Dependency: nspr >= 4.19.0 for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Processing Dependency: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) for package: >> firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 >> --> Finished Dependency Resolution >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: nspr >= 4.19.0 >> Installed: nspr-4.13.1-1.el6.x86_64 (@group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.13.1-1.el6 >> Available: nspr-4.10.6-1.el6_5.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.10.6-1.el6_5 >> Available: nspr-4.10.8-1.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.10.8-1.el6_6 >> Available: nspr-4.10.8-2.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nspr = 4.10.8-2.el6_7 >> Available: nspr-4.11.0-0.1.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nspr = 4.11.0-0.1.el6_7 >> Available: nspr-4.11.0-1.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nspr = 4.11.0-1.el6 >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) >> Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) >> Requires: nss >= 3.36.0 >> Installed: nss-3.28.4-4.el6_9.x86_64 (@group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-4.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.16.1-14.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.16.1-14.el6 >> Available: nss-3.18.0-5.3.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.18.0-5.3.el6_6 >> Available: nss-3.21.0-8.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.21.0-8.el6 >> Available: nss-3.27.1-13.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) >> nss = 3.27.1-13.el6 >> Available: nss-3.28.3-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.3-3.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-1.el6_9 >> Available: nss-3.28.4-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) >> nss = 3.28.4-3.el6_9 >> You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem >> You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest >> root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# > This is occurring on all of our CentOS 6.9 workstations. Any advice? > Thanks. > > PEV > Well, probably update to 6.10, which has all the required bits to run things compiled against those bits ? ;-) -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 56BEC54E | twitter: @arrfab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Firefix 60.10-5 ESR Install Problems For CentOS 6
Johnny/et al, Looks like we've run into some issues with incompatible libs for the new Firefox 60 ESR install: root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# yum -y update firefox Loaded plugins: list-data, security Setting up Update Process group-centos-adobe | 2.9 kB 00:00 group-centos-bigfix | 2.9 kB 00:00 group-centos-epel | 3.0 kB 00:00 group-centos-extras | 2.9 kB 00:00 group-centos-gbase | 2.9 kB 00:00 group-centos-os | 3.6 kB 00:00 group-centos-salt | 2.9 kB 00:00 group-centos-updates | 3.4 kB 00:00 Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:52.8.0-1.el6.centos will be updated ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:60.1.0-5.el6.centos will be an update --> Processing Dependency: nss >= 3.36.0 for package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: nspr >= 4.19.0 for package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) for package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) Requires: nspr >= 4.19.0 Installed: nspr-4.13.1-1.el6.x86_64 (@group-centos-os) nspr = 4.13.1-1.el6 Available: nspr-4.10.6-1.el6_5.i686 (group-centos-os) nspr = 4.10.6-1.el6_5 Available: nspr-4.10.8-1.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) nspr = 4.10.8-1.el6_6 Available: nspr-4.10.8-2.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) nspr = 4.10.8-2.el6_7 Available: nspr-4.11.0-0.1.el6_7.i686 (group-centos-updates) nspr = 4.11.0-0.1.el6_7 Available: nspr-4.11.0-1.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) nspr = 4.11.0-1.el6 Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) Requires: libnss3.so(NSS_3.30)(64bit) Error: Package: firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64 (group-centos-updates) Requires: nss >= 3.36.0 Installed: nss-3.28.4-4.el6_9.x86_64 (@group-centos-updates) nss = 3.28.4-4.el6_9 Available: nss-3.16.1-14.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) nss = 3.16.1-14.el6 Available: nss-3.18.0-5.3.el6_6.i686 (group-centos-os) nss = 3.18.0-5.3.el6_6 Available: nss-3.21.0-8.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) nss = 3.21.0-8.el6 Available: nss-3.27.1-13.el6.i686 (group-centos-os) nss = 3.27.1-13.el6 Available: nss-3.28.3-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) nss = 3.28.3-3.el6_9 Available: nss-3.28.4-1.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) nss = 3.28.4-1.el6_9 Available: nss-3.28.4-3.el6_9.i686 (group-centos-updates) nss = 3.28.4-3.el6_9 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest root@gs6102dsclxpub1:~# This is occurring on all of our CentOS 6.9 workstations. Any advice? Thanks. PEV -- Paul E Virgo Sr. System Administrator Code 610.2 SESDA III - DAAC/DISC Goddard Space Flight Ctr/NASA Greenbelt, MD Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301) 614-5751 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
On 07/12/2018 07:36 AM, mark wrote: > I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* buggy. > > 1. I killed my old session, and started a new. Many (all?) tabs show > *nothing* until I put my cursor in the URL bar and hit > 2. I cannot open a link in an email in thunderbird. I click the link, and > after a bit (30 sec? more?) a small windows tells me that firefox is > running, but not responding, which it certainly responds when I focus on > firefox. > > mark > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos You can try running 'firefox -safe-mode' to see if you have a problem with installed extensions. Also, you can create a new profile (and stlil leave the old one there), to see if your profile database is corrupt. These are both problems that come up with both firefox and thunderbird. Nataraj ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2164 Important CentOS 6 kernel Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2164 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2164
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
3a58f914d6d7006cfcd310166bac2f357b6364bc32f131d1475ff68647cd71e5
kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
a7a179835d90f4002fb5975afae35d389898078c3a3e9d5a57880d1ed0467f19
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
b4d9b32c993b362b1dc8012e7a995f6cfb969c2f475565a64e8c20de27895ae8
kernel-debug-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
5b5e0f848fef280d6c0980023ef870b67d15a39e95a7e7ed7bf1fd2cdc8a15cf
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
57a7737251274fe4a271245dae5a5be02a773c54887f8746e6a725de0eb407fb
kernel-devel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
b8d69d597cb4a499c39c4834a8d70b3b39543fbf57134f84eb8ad47d966f83ff
kernel-doc-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
63db33761a57a0d15fd74323cfdb962fcfc54bbb878bdb0b4017ace5746410a1
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
ef42c292225cf56ff4d7b39e161d06d6dc5fdfe8752aa9e778089cf0d8bcfd92
kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
5e50bd3bdccff22b057a3ffc0d2e358e47ecfe9c0595239c1799079b840e0f35
perf-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
b2f1d239ada41ff0c71ab8a7a3b18e45d7a6278d862a06e4c47b58fb27b8edd2
python-perf-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
b91426c01072cd193e72408cb10406208254779dfb3d47758c47244b323919b2
kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
a7a179835d90f4002fb5975afae35d389898078c3a3e9d5a57880d1ed0467f19
kernel-abi-whitelists-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
6a4e657c04b947eb11ed71ae1efdafd5ac3822df3aac7e385155987566c4a99e
kernel-debug-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
5b5e0f848fef280d6c0980023ef870b67d15a39e95a7e7ed7bf1fd2cdc8a15cf
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.i686.rpm
50b491d6ad7ef7c4e9fd43bbaf6c12ac5fbd379a6b9746e1b29617c2ea024fc2
kernel-debug-devel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
fcabd268ac34ae378039d874accfa62ce1bc0bb94ba66e5ca9afae18a82aa674
kernel-devel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
b8d69d597cb4a499c39c4834a8d70b3b39543fbf57134f84eb8ad47d966f83ff
kernel-doc-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
63db33761a57a0d15fd74323cfdb962fcfc54bbb878bdb0b4017ace5746410a1
kernel-firmware-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.noarch.rpm
e1a8c983bfdda66799a84990e1e05012cab013f41b711553bea49a099d7d54b6
kernel-headers-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
68f525e9a634a5cdccc82f3c274b87d94a64609b6c475855fdd9a95f38f6f208
perf-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
07365ed27fa1949bc421070ed016c6a2f1ac9a786ad008370b427706d81cefef
python-perf-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64.rpm
Source:
cdc9e72367c745ea3342c2cd68c303fe0136df2d78ce2215c473e4f2d779f5e7
kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2162 Important CentOS 6 qemu-kvm Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2162 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2162
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
96e244e6e72e492d3873278a83c24c44d776ae27cb9488343e78e9a58c19b307
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.i686.rpm
x86_64:
9b440e0a8f5f515c29d910cdaf00a6e3d766c471eb2b2b5aab19c7c7a7de8c78
qemu-guest-agent-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.x86_64.rpm
384b04fb2be8ffdaf829e34606e1dd81a49d6ba58207ad0c466ae36c33fea5d0
qemu-img-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.x86_64.rpm
ed99fe8c5cf19eff807de4e2a0066f52df553ce60c853a4c2561aabd7b94eeda
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.x86_64.rpm
2d41f2c95ce57e385438ea9f31256cbdcb61a8f393f1019ddfe369aafce55444
qemu-kvm-tools-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.x86_64.rpm
Source:
c8d71687b0424168fc11f746910678901b971e2e4978bd5d1650e47a87e43fd3
qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.506.el6_10.1.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2180 Important CentOS 6 gnupg2 Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2180 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2180
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
382749777a5e4b15f8fb8c74f38178168354d96ba95b648860c00c2ff72ce1e8
gnupg2-2.0.14-9.el6_10.i686.rpm
fe7cd578611ea9cdea79e514dc48fb40245f98b6353d4e7a7566ca1508f4c2ab
gnupg2-smime-2.0.14-9.el6_10.i686.rpm
x86_64:
66857c4a7ee956f223d100d37b008fc4be8b622db931da3d0f50146e56cfc000
gnupg2-2.0.14-9.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
320e5a3607a1cbea40dcc0f01f6b4c7a98d6e144286018eaeadb6c8c5104d148
gnupg2-smime-2.0.14-9.el6_10.x86_64.rpm
Source:
40a88bc82fb73c9af0140ee8415ef94b0b40b41070b2f6c87326a19fe5dfa636
gnupg2-2.0.14-9.el6_10.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2018:2163 CentOS 6 dhcp BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2018:2163
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:2163
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
921519be26161e3b1c609d6fc8c9a325ea08c09366b525e2a2df9123b6be1f7f
dhclient-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
1be7d315f49a5d93ffb72dab496cd75a25c8f0b5bade2da1a84f06ed08838c51
dhcp-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
33343534b40f412d4200f3b12f91135503d3f77c9e9d24d68685fe286462d383
dhcp-common-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
4415899082bce5f91431517a0a8c3cdc50323a35351eafb2f8f40a0b91462da3
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
0f0d6192da33ed8ce7748b443d637f19d982825b40fb76692d4171870a0f0dc0
dhclient-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
964e5eb962d5f959fdcd189936b5cad0f72258e0f9853b537210fbce9c90b216
dhcp-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
d138e0e96e974931e83d6c6dbec51731be6029f5867ac93f036e40880d576853
dhcp-common-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
4415899082bce5f91431517a0a8c3cdc50323a35351eafb2f8f40a0b91462da3
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.i686.rpm
c850e0784c5792609ed7343e871caf7c02f2ea484c948989613af8b2d83a5f11
dhcp-devel-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
fe68d4cb3c9a68ef1eabf3fd10dce33e0c0100aecb1aa550279cc97f6aae68a1
dhcp-4.1.1-61.P1.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2123 Moderate CentOS 7 python Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2123 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2123
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
fcb985365e5d8cc3a8590a72a5feb891c52bc9ce0e050446f3bb6f49c9142e9d
python-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
73fc2fb0a7d74fda34b73c07d3e5578ecaad7449c1c8934284203a0d176a4ba7
python-debug-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
b922fd472b974310473dd02419512420bd6ec1f53d17b9ae5306d06f27dd73f5
python-devel-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
45060299ccf55a4eae6ac1c7c609482078c2e02e9f6d5ecaf0bc552666a6
python-libs-2.7.5-69.el7_5.i686.rpm
c7f504296b0ea663231214a012669efe1b5047aabf09b5edbbd5c583c9dd194e
python-libs-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
d2fe5c390e488103ef72d9728a74d57a1d5c5619e9da9b836df399d33f94fe65
python-test-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
d64e951ab541ff3bbaa6cfb5389187a3655f78b358b398165598a4c3947ac4a5
python-tools-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
5807efaec6fcce4d29914613d5709ce71733a23c772d4c4b57d8ae158ae715d2
tkinter-2.7.5-69.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
955d064d4ed41d5c18dbbb1162014d48ba8e2236df2121d9674b86c0d48ce018
python-2.7.5-69.el7_5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2181 Important CentOS 7 gnupg2 Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2181 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2181
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
4d58715b4fb8e1a09e0f18ec69e93edc6e4b0558639d37421e8a7c5bd48ad344
gnupg2-2.0.22-5.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
55e6875c1b561cfc4a5f55b371097c373fc4275f4ac3ba4cd4f110784e53332b
gnupg2-smime-2.0.22-5.el7_5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
9773bd828ce991f1b6969c839f7e3928c1f7c733da4d454c9aee41a5f861939e
gnupg2-2.0.22-5.el7_5.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
On 13/07/18 13:09, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/13/2018 02:36 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* buggy. I just upgraded Firefox on a sandbox installation, and here's what I noticed so far. 1. On startup, the whole window is black for 1 - 2 seconds, and then Firefox displays OK. 2. Firefox is in english, though my whole system is in French, so I guess translation files are messed up. Here's just an idea. Why not put Firefox in the CR repository while working out issues this sort of issues? Well .. it is working like the upstream one, that's why its released. If we knew about any bugs other than ones that also exist in the RHEL compile, we would not release it at all, we'd fix it. I can confirm the same behaviour Mark describes in point (1) above on a genuine RHEL7 system, so as Johnny says, "it is working like the upstream one", so no bug there from a CentOS perspective. However, it's not consistent (for me) and not troublesome enough for me to have taken note as to when it may or may not occur. I am not able to meaningfully comment on point (2). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2112 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2112 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2112
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
e0c3e0c045b954509ae05f6c20506dc5dcb59a6f2d9b916cbc1fb26ff0575a37
firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.i686.rpm
x86_64:
e0c3e0c045b954509ae05f6c20506dc5dcb59a6f2d9b916cbc1fb26ff0575a37
firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.i686.rpm
4b770a86f487fafdb21eb1d158a808e363c2444b54790735e18b8b47eb665a1b
firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm
Source:
bd50f2e67f33f29842f99fd75c7c24d9a0019aa549a4a0b11dcad8f1b9d33c89
firefox-60.1.0-5.el6.centos.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2018:2112 Critical CentOS 6 firefox Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2018:2112 Critical
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2112
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 09:36:52AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : > > I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* > > buggy. > > I just upgraded Firefox on a sandbox installation, and here's what I > noticed so far. > > 1. On startup, the whole window is black for 1 - 2 seconds, and then > Firefox displays OK. > > 2. Firefox is in english, though my whole system is in French, so I > guess translation files are messed up. I can't reproduce your issue. switching from en_US to fr_FR is just a matter of: $ export LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8 $ firefox or $ export LANG=en_US.UTF-8 $ firefox 1) just make sure that you don't have another firefox in the background. 2) the profile manager is in English but the browser starts with the localised langage. YMMV Cheers Tru -- Tru Huynh http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get=0xBEFA581B pgp6VZwNc03AJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS-virt] Remove my userid from the listing
Good Day...Please remove my userid from the CentOS help group listing.I am not qualified to answer questions, as I've not used CentOS for several years.Thank you very muchRobert G Crook___ CentOS-virt mailing list CentOS-virt@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Re: [CentOS] Certbot error CentOS 7.5
On 07/10/2018 05:54 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: Hi All - I am running CentOS 7.5 and trying to use certbot. I am getting an error 403 forbidden on the /.well-known/acme-challenge/-CG_gSckofY5ln7TdMvoanDI1_FBRh8otQkyB0hxmoo What is the full command you are using to request a certificate? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 09:03 AM, mark wrote: >> Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/13/2018 02:36 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : > I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is > *seriously* buggy. >> >> Ok... first, let me say that I'm anal, and log out of my workstation, >> not just lock the screen, when I leave for the day, so *everything* I >> have running should be shut down. >> >> Now, here's my observations: I see four firefox processes running now. >> I have two windows open, but there's also the original root of them >> (firefox -P --no-remote). I can understand two other processes, >> since I have to> firefox windows open, but I don't know why I have >> three. > > Looking at this now .. here is how it appears to work: > there is a wrapper .. > > /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox > > That is one process .. and it starts the rest > == > then there is a process called: > > -childID 1 > > That seems to be the main broswer process .. all the things besides the > actual TABS. > === > Then each tab you open spawns a seperate process .. so the first TAB > (that is your home page) spawns a process with '-childID 2' > > Other tabs seem to spawn an other new '-childID ' > > So, it seems that the main process and the '-childID 1' process stay > forever // and some of the other Child processes start and stop as > required. > > if you do ps -ef | grep firefox, you can get info on the processes .. and > I an certainly not an expert .. but I don't see any issues. I just saw something, maybe on slashdot, that chrome was doing that, to try to prevent malware on one site slipping itself to another tab. But I've to many, many tabs, so I'm not sure why only three processes, if that's the case. Also, that suggests that t-bird's trying to start a new tab in the wrong process. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
On 07/13/2018 09:03 AM, mark wrote: > Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/13/2018 02:36 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> >>> Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : >>> I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* buggy. >>> > > >> Well .. it is working like the upstream one, that's why its released. > >> If we knew about any bugs other than ones that also exist in the RHEL >> compile, we would not release it at all, we'd fix it. > > Ok... first, let me say that I'm anal, and log out of my workstation, not > just lock the screen, when I leave for the day, so *everything* I have > running should be shut down. > > Now, here's my observations: I see four firefox processes running now. I > have two windows open, but there's also the original root of them (firefox > -P --no-remote). I can understand two other processes, since I have to > firefox windows open, but I don't know why I have three. > Looking at this now .. here is how it appears to work: there is a wrapper .. /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox That is one process .. and it starts the rest == then there is a process called: -childID 1 That seems to be the main broswer process .. all the things besides the actual TABS. === Then each tab you open spawns a seperate process .. so the first TAB (that is your home page) spawns a process with '-childID 2' Other tabs seem to spawn an other new '-childID ' So, it seems that the main process and the '-childID 1' process stay forever // and some of the other Child processes start and stop as required. if you do ps -ef | grep firefox, you can get info on the processes .. and I an certainly not an expert .. but I don't see any issues. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] bad text under KDE and C7
On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Michael Hennebry wrote: On Thu, 12 Jul 2018, Pete Biggs wrote: For some reason you say you disliked Gnome - but does Gnome show issues (they use the same video driver)? No, neither gnome nor gnome-classic. The black tape has gone away for KDE also. Apparently logging out and in again fixed or obscured the problem. One of them, I think it was gnome-classic, did videos badly. It was a bit like a shutter came about a quarter way down at about once per second. I'll try the live CD suggested elsewhere. Late for work. Again. -- Michael henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
On 07/13/18 08:34, Matthew Phelps wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:23 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the following library failures in 'ldd' output: ldd libwidevinecdm.so ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) I have not tried playing DRM things on the CentOS-6 browser .. but this looks like a place to start: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm To be clear .. I don't know if the compiled version of firefox we shipped has a DRM widevine that will work with netflix .. the error you are getting seems to happen because of where: libwidevinecdm.so was compiled (against which glibc-devel). so .. maybe adding in the google widevine and somehow disabling the built in firefox one might work .. OR .. disabling the google version might work, etc. It appears firefox downloads the google library each time it is requested, and the one it downloads is compiled against the wrong libraries. I realize this is not a CentOS support issue per se, I was inquiring if anyone in the community, or upstream, had dealt with this before. I agree, we should apply directly to one of these three letter agencies to have their code straightened up ;-) I don't know which one though. Valeri I understand the CentOS 7 version works fine, however we are still running CentOS 6. -- Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 02:36 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > >> Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : >> >>> I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* >>> buggy. >> > Well .. it is working like the upstream one, that's why its released. > If we knew about any bugs other than ones that also exist in the RHEL > compile, we would not release it at all, we'd fix it. Ok... first, let me say that I'm anal, and log out of my workstation, not just lock the screen, when I leave for the day, so *everything* I have running should be shut down. Now, here's my observations: I see four firefox processes running now. I have two windows open, but there's also the original root of them (firefox -P --no-remote). I can understand two other processes, since I have to firefox windows open, but I don't know why I have three. mark ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 07:27:58PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > >>> Default Gateway IP : 192.168.0.100 >>> Default Gateway MAC : 00:25:90:0a:42:87 >>> >> >> No, that does not look right. You have configured the gateway of the >> IPMI to be the host OS side of the NIC. You can't do that... in a lot >> of systems I've seen, the IPMI side of the NIC can't even talk to the >> host OS on the network. > > From previous emails, I gather that mark can't find the way to set > which interface the IPMI BMC uses, so he's setting the BMC's IP settings to > use one of the NICs as a gateway. This is not how you make that setting > (it won't work) but I can see where he's coming > from. > > In my experience, it's either hard-wired to a particular interface. > This should be documented, otherwise you need another computer on the > same network or connected with a crossover cable to figure it out. > > Sometimes you can set the interface that IPMI uses in the BIOS or > through 'ipmitool'. Thanks for the info; the thing I never understood in the documentation was the business of "shared with lomx" - is that for a second management port? Aos, my manager tells me to think of the BMC as a completely separate computer, which it is, but that has *no* contact with the o/s. On the other hand... *sigh* - I've solved the original issue: y'see, the server's just below the middle of my chest in the rack, and the fans stick out about a cm or two. I went back into the room last night, with a flashlight... and bent down, and lo and behold, there *was* a perfectly good management port. Connected that, did a warm reboot of the bmc, and all is well. My manager, the other admin I work with, and I were all too tall to see the port, so I guess there is some use for short people* mark * Of course I'm hearing Randy Newman's Short People in my head. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:23 AM Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > >> Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM > plugin? > >> > >> With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your > >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has > the > >> following library failures in 'ldd' output: > >> > >>> ldd libwidevinecdm.so > >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' > not > >> found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' > >> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' > >> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > >> > >> > > > > I have not tried playing DRM things on the CentOS-6 browser .. but this > > looks like a place to start: > > > > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm > > To be clear .. I don't know if the compiled version of firefox we > shipped has a DRM widevine that will work with netflix .. the error you > are getting seems to happen because of where: > > libwidevinecdm.so > > was compiled (against which glibc-devel). > > so .. maybe adding in the google widevine and somehow disabling the > built in firefox one might work .. OR .. disabling the google version > might work, etc. > > It appears firefox downloads the google library each time it is requested, and the one it downloads is compiled against the wrong libraries. I realize this is not a CentOS support issue per se, I was inquiring if anyone in the community, or upstream, had dealt with this before. I understand the CentOS 7 version works fine, however we are still running CentOS 6. -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
On 07/13/2018 08:22 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: >>> Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? >>> >>> With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your >>> ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the >>> following library failures in 'ldd' output: >>> ldd libwidevinecdm.so >>> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not >>> found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >>> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' >>> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >>> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' >>> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >>> >>> >> >> I have not tried playing DRM things on the CentOS-6 browser .. but this >> looks like a place to start: >> >> https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm > > To be clear .. I don't know if the compiled version of firefox we > shipped has a DRM widevine that will work with netflix .. the error you > are getting seems to happen because of where: > > libwidevinecdm.so > > was compiled (against which glibc-devel). > > so .. maybe adding in the google widevine and somehow disabling the > built in firefox one might work .. OR .. disabling the google version > might work, etc. I will also point out that netflix 'just works' on the CentOS-7 version of the new firefox released (firefox-60.1.0-4.el7.centos.x86_64). I just installed it as a test. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
On 07/13/2018 08:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: >> Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? >> >> With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your >> ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the >> following library failures in 'ldd' output: >> >>> ldd libwidevinecdm.so >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not >> found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' >> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >> ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' >> not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) >> >> > > I have not tried playing DRM things on the CentOS-6 browser .. but this > looks like a place to start: > > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm To be clear .. I don't know if the compiled version of firefox we shipped has a DRM widevine that will work with netflix .. the error you are getting seems to happen because of where: libwidevinecdm.so was compiled (against which glibc-devel). so .. maybe adding in the google widevine and somehow disabling the built in firefox one might work .. OR .. disabling the google version might work, etc. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
On 07/13/2018 07:42 AM, Matthew Phelps wrote: > Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? > > With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your > ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the > following library failures in 'ldd' output: > >> ldd libwidevinecdm.so > ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not > found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' > not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' > not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) > > I have not tried playing DRM things on the CentOS-6 browser .. but this looks like a place to start: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/enable-drm signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Widevine plugin for CentOS 6?
Does anyone know of a CentOS 6 compiled version of the widevine DRM plugin? With Firefox 60ESR, Netflix (e.g.) installs a version in your ~/.mozilla/firefox/(profile name)gmp-widevinecdm/ directory but it has the following library failures in 'ldd' output: > ldd libwidevinecdm.so ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) ./libwidevinecdm.so: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by ./libwidevinecdm.so) -- Matt Phelps System Administrator, Computation Facility Harvard - Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu, http://www.cfa.harvard.edu ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 08:34:26AM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: > In my experience, it's either hard-wired to a particular interface. > This should be documented, otherwise you need another computer on the > same network or connected with a crossover cable to figure it out. > > Sometimes you can set the interface that IPMI uses in the BIOS or > through 'ipmitool'. Sorry, the above was a run-on sentence I edited to break up into two paragraphs, but I meant "either it's hard-wired to a particular interface or you can change it in the BIOS or with ipmitool". Please excuse my confusing email. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, ipmi, NIC2, still fighting
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 07:27:58PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > > Default Gateway IP : 192.168.0.100 > > Default Gateway MAC : 00:25:90:0a:42:87 > > No, that does not look right. You have configured the gateway of the > IPMI to be the host OS side of the NIC. You can't do that... in a lot > of systems I've seen, the IPMI side of the NIC can't even talk to the > host OS on the network. >From previous emails, I gather that mark can't find the way to set which interface the IPMI BMC uses, so he's setting the BMC's IP settings to use one of the NICs as a gateway. This is not how you make that setting (it won't work) but I can see where he's coming from. In my experience, it's either hard-wired to a particular interface. This should be documented, otherwise you need another computer on the same network or connected with a crossover cable to figure it out. Sometimes you can set the interface that IPMI uses in the BIOS or through 'ipmitool'. For Dell hardware, the ipmitool command that ships with CentOS7 has an 'ipmitool delloem lan set ' which lets you choose which interface to use. == # ipmitool delloem lan set lan set sets the NIC Selection Mode : on iDRAC12g OR iDRAC13g : dedicated, shared with lom1, shared with lom2,shared with lom3,shared with lom4,shared with failover lom1,shared with failover lom2,shared with failover lom3,shared with failover lom4,shared with Failover all loms, shared with Failover None). on other systems : dedicated, shared, shared with failover lom2, shared with Failover all loms. == If I'm using a system with a shared setup, I don't set up networking on that interface at all. At least with Dells, even if you set up an IP on the interface, it can't talk to the BMC from the OS using the shared interface. Ping doesn't work, 'ipmitool -I lanplus' doesn't work, http doesn't work. You need to connect from another host. I have a private management network that we use for IPMI/iLO systems, because those BMC interfaces are known to be an attack vector. Hopefully, this is enough information to explain that you need to find out which interface your IPMI device is using, and to use appropriate IP settings, and to *NOT* use the IP/MAC from any OS interfaces as your IPMI device's gateway. -- Jonathan Billings ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
On 07/13/2018 02:36 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : >> I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* >> buggy. > > I just upgraded Firefox on a sandbox installation, and here's what I > noticed so far. > > 1. On startup, the whole window is black for 1 - 2 seconds, and then > Firefox displays OK. > > 2. Firefox is in english, though my whole system is in French, so I > guess translation files are messed up. > > Here's just an idea. Why not put Firefox in the CR repository while > working out issues this sort of issues? > Well .. it is working like the upstream one, that's why its released. If we knew about any bugs other than ones that also exist in the RHEL compile, we would not release it at all, we'd fix it. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C7, just updated firefox, bugs
Le 12/07/2018 à 16:36, mark a écrit : > I just updated the "critical" firefox update, and it is *seriously* > buggy. I just upgraded Firefox on a sandbox installation, and here's what I noticed so far. 1. On startup, the whole window is black for 1 - 2 seconds, and then Firefox displays OK. 2. Firefox is in english, though my whole system is in French, so I guess translation files are messed up. Here's just an idea. Why not put Firefox in the CR repository while working out issues this sort of issues? Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : i...@microlinux.fr Tél. : 04 66 63 10 32 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
