Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 06/03/2019 23:03, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:50, Phil Perry wrote: On 06/03/2019 21:53, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: On 03/06/2019 04:21 PM, Phil Perry wrote: On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but previous versions are no longer avaialble. Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so Phil, I don't know if it's a hard coded requires ot auto-generated. Right now I've removed the rpms that need ocl-icd, updated nvidia but when I attempt to install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs it fails because it wants to install ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 from epel. I guess that that means that its a hard coded requirement, is that correct? Pete I guess so. Running 'rpm -q --requires ' would tell you. I only have vlc and ffmpeg-libs installed, and both are installed from the Nux repo. Neither are built against libOpenCL.so so I'm not able to comment on what epel have done with their packages. As far as I can tell the packages vlc, smplayer, mplayer, and ffmpeg aren't in EPEL. I am guessing they are from rpmfusion but could be from some other repository. Thank you Stephen. I assumed because they were pulling a dependency from epel that they were also from epel. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Bridge - error
Hi Andrija, Got the same error message, but different details. systemctl status network.service https://pastebin.com/NjtXUwci journalctl -xe https://pastebin.com/Kn0Dggmm My network settings: https://pastebin.com/JDGJJYVc On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 4:57 PM Andrija Panic wrote: > Hi Larry, > > Log says: Bridge support not available: brctl not found > > Fix with: yum install bridge-utils > > Let me know once you are finished with guide - you are perfect for testing > this guide (since new to CentOS completely) > > I will update the guide once you are done with it - let me know please! > > Kind regards, > Andrija > > andrija.pa...@shapeblue.com > www.shapeblue.com > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London WC2E 9DPUK > @shapeblue > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Larry Sevilla > Sent: 06 March 2019 09:45 > To: us...@cloudstack.apache.org; CentOS@centos.org > Subject: Network Bridge - error > > Hi, > > I'm new to CentOS. (I have tried Debian, Ubuntu, Devuan & Gentoo). > And also new to CloudStack. > > I'm trying the Quick Installation Guide of CloudStack as pointed by > Andrija Panic of ShapeBlue > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/master/source/quickinstallationguide/qig.rst > > At Configuring the Network topic, I got an error: > > [root@localhost ~]# systemctl restart network Job for network.service > failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl > status network.service" and "journalctl -xe" > for details. > > systemctl status network.service > https://pastebin.com/KzBqJN65 > > journalctl -xe > https://pastebin.com/PLQGuLeR > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6 kickstart error
At least for debugging, try adding "inst.graphical" to the "append initrd=" line in your isolinux.cfg on the .iso image (grub.cfg and the "linuxefi" line if you are booting UEFI). Remove "inst.cmdline" and "inst.text", as well as any entries of " inst.noninteractive", " inst.noshell" and " inst.headless" from the same "append" line, as they will make troubleshooting more difficult/impossible. Once you are in the graphical Anaconda, it will take a few seconds to check the settings from the kickstart file (you will see "warning" bars on various config sections while it verifies the settings). When only the Packages section still has a warning bar, click on it and see if that helps identify the missing dependencies. I could be wrong, but you might also find a yum.log in the /tmp/ folder of the LiveOS image while Anaconda is still running (I think it's to switch to the second console in Anaconda, but I could have the wrong key-combo). Gregory -Original Message- From: CentOS On Behalf Of Steve Clark Sent: March 6, 2019 7:48 AM To: centos@centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6 kickstart error On 03/06/2019 07:12 AM, isdtor wrote: > I am testing a CentOS 7.6 kickstart installation. After kickstart was > initiated, the installation stops at some point where a sort of table > is printed under "Installation", and the item that fails is 4 - > Software selection, Error checking software selection. > > I have checked /tmp/packaging.log and /tmp/anaconda.log, but cannot > find any errors here that would prevent installation. > > Poor error messages, no usable lead for debug. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hi, I have run into this - in my experience it means there is some dependency missing. And you are correct trying to find the error is a PITA. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 17:50, Phil Perry wrote: > > On 06/03/2019 21:53, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > > > > > On 03/06/2019 04:21 PM, Phil Perry wrote: > >> On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > >>> > >>> That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install > >>> > >>> vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need > >>> ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. > >>> I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but > >>> previous versions are no longer avaialble. > >>> > >> > >> Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an > >> auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? > >> > >> If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the > >> latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can > >> either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any > >> dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall > >> the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so > > Phil, > > I don't know if it's a hard coded requires ot auto-generated. > > Right now I've removed the rpms that need ocl-icd, updated nvidia but > > when I attempt to install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs it fails > > because it wants to install ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 from epel. > > I guess that that means that its a hard coded requirement, is that correct? > > Pete > > > > I guess so. Running 'rpm -q --requires ' would tell you. > > I only have vlc and ffmpeg-libs installed, and both are installed from > the Nux repo. Neither are built against libOpenCL.so so I'm not able to > comment on what epel have done with their packages. > As far as I can tell the packages vlc, smplayer, mplayer, and ffmpeg aren't in EPEL. I am guessing they are from rpmfusion but could be from some other repository. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 06/03/2019 21:53, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: On 03/06/2019 04:21 PM, Phil Perry wrote: On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but previous versions are no longer avaialble. Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so Phil, I don't know if it's a hard coded requires ot auto-generated. Right now I've removed the rpms that need ocl-icd, updated nvidia but when I attempt to install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs it fails because it wants to install ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 from epel. I guess that that means that its a hard coded requirement, is that correct? Pete I guess so. Running 'rpm -q --requires ' would tell you. I only have vlc and ffmpeg-libs installed, and both are installed from the Nux repo. Neither are built against libOpenCL.so so I'm not able to comment on what epel have done with their packages. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 03/06/2019 04:21 PM, Phil Perry wrote: On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but previous versions are no longer avaialble. Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so Phil, I don't know if it's a hard coded requires ot auto-generated. Right now I've removed the rpms that need ocl-icd, updated nvidia but when I attempt to install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs it fails because it wants to install ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 from epel. I guess that that means that its a hard coded requirement, is that correct? Pete -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 06/03/2019 19:30, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: On 03/06/2019 09:59 AM, Fred Smith wrote: I tried to install this and ran into a conflict --> Processing Conflict: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 conflicts ocl-icd --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx conflicts with ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 I removed ocl-icd and installed the package, but needless to say I can't get ocl-icd to install which means that I cant install video players, vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs. I asked the same question recently and Phil informed me that the ocl-icd now comes in one of the nvidia packages, so you no longer need the one from epel. That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but previous versions are no longer avaialble. Do they have a hard coded Requires for the ocl-icd package or just an auto-generated Requires for the libOpenCL.so lib? If it's the former then the packages in epel need fixing. If it's the latter then the nvidia package will meet that requirement. You can either force uninstall ocl-icd, or uninstall ocl-icd and any dependencies, install/update the nvidia packages and then reinstall the package you require that depend on libOpenCL.so ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C 7 anacron issue
On 04.03.19 23:27, mark wrote: > Has anyone else seen a problem recently (like, the last few weeks) with > anacron? We've got a couple of recently-built systems and we're seeing > Mar 4 17:20:01 crond[25767]: (root) PAM ERROR (Failure setting > user credentials) > Mar 4 17:20:01 crond[25767]: (root) FAILED to authorize user > with PAM (Failure setting user credentials) My first guess is /etc/security/access.conf. Best regards Ulf ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 03/06/2019 09:59 AM, Fred Smith wrote: I tried to install this and ran into a conflict --> Processing Conflict: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 conflicts ocl-icd --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx conflicts with ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 I removed ocl-icd and installed the package, but needless to say I can't get ocl-icd to install which means that I cant install video players, vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs. I asked the same question recently and Phil informed me that the ocl-icd now comes in one of the nvidia packages, so you no longer need the one from epel. That is all good and well, but my problem is that I now can't install vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs because they need ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64from epel. I tried to roll back to the previous version via yum history undo but previous versions are no longer avaialble. -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 7:23 AM Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > > On 3/6/19 1:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 3/6/19 6:26 AM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > > > On 3/5/19 5:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > > Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE > > > kernel built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- > > > repo? > > > > > > Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and PAE 32-bit kernels, and > > > it's that step from CentOS 6 32-bit PAE onto CentOS 7 32-bit which > > > made me stumble, but okay now. > > > > The only reason is .. it is not included in the mainline RHEL 7 kernel > > source > > code. > > Ah - I guess since mainline RHEL 7 is only 64-bit on x86 now, it doesn't have > to worry about PAE vs non-PAE kernels. > > ... > > I have no objections trying to make PAE work with that kernel .. Patches > > accepted :D > > > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 > > So with what I know now (thank you!) I recon the mainline 4.14 is probably a > better tested path for a 32-bit x86 PAE kernel, rather than starting at RHEL > 7. And since you are already building that kernel it's good news all round > :-) > > Kind Regards, > > Mike Going for the 4.14 kernel is absolutely a better choice. The i686 plus kernel is just lucky to be existing. It would not have been possible to maintain it without great support from people like Pablo and @kabe. We initially got the 32-bit version from Springdale (formerly Puias). Then they stopped building at some point. Building it becomes harder and harder with each release, it seems. So, there is no guarantee that there is another update to the i686 plus kernel. Akemi Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel
On 3/6/19 1:28 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 3/6/19 6:26 AM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > > On 3/5/19 5:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE > > kernel built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- repo? > > > > Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and PAE 32-bit kernels, and > > it's that step from CentOS 6 32-bit PAE onto CentOS 7 32-bit which > > made me stumble, but okay now. > > The only reason is .. it is not included in the mainline RHEL 7 kernel source > code. Ah - I guess since mainline RHEL 7 is only 64-bit on x86 now, it doesn't have to worry about PAE vs non-PAE kernels. ... > I have no objections trying to make PAE work with that kernel .. Patches > accepted :D > > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 So with what I know now (thank you!) I recon the mainline 4.14 is probably a better tested path for a 32-bit x86 PAE kernel, rather than starting at RHEL 7. And since you are already building that kernel it's good news all round :-) Kind Regards, Mike -- wavemobile Warning: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. wavemobile Ltd is registered in England and Wales, Registration Number: 04780898. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 07:26:42AM -0500, Pete Geenhuizen wrote: > > On 03/02/2019 05:41 AM, Phil Perry wrote: > > > >Hi Gerry, > > > >I've updated the nvidia 340xx legacy package set for el7.6, and > >released the packages to the elrepo testing repository. > > > >Please could you test them and let me know if they work as > >expected. To install: > > > >yum --enablerepo=elrepo-testing install kmod-nvidia-340xx > >nvidia-x11-drv-340xx nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-libs > > > >if you need 32-bit support then you will also need to install the > >corresponding > >nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-libs-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.i686.rpm package. > > > >Thinking about it, I'm not sure these packages are going to work > >as the 340 series NVIDIA driver predates the conversion to GLVND > >(support was added in version 361), see here: > > > >https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/915640/multiple-glx-client-libraries-in-the-nvidia-linux-driver-installer-package/ > > > > > >but I have no way to test them so I'll leave that to you. > > > >Phil > > > >___ > >CentOS mailing list > >CentOS@centos.org > >https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > > Phil, > I tried to install this and ran into a conflict > > --> Processing Conflict: > nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 conflicts ocl-icd > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx conflicts with ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 > > I removed ocl-icd and installed the package, but needless to say I > can't get ocl-icd to install which means that I cant install video > players, vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs. I asked the same question recently and Phil informed me that the ocl-icd now comes in one of the nvidia packages, so you no longer need the one from epel. -- Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us - "For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen." - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) - ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network Bridge - error
On Mar 6, 2019, at 1:44 AM, Larry Sevilla wrote: > > systemctl status network.service > https://pastebin.com/KzBqJN65 …which says brctl doesn’t exist, so if you go searching for it, you find that it’s in the bridge-utils package. So, your next step is: $ sudo yum install bridge-utils I have no idea whether that solves your entire problem, having never done anything with CloudStack, but it’ll at least get you one more step down the path. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel
On 3/6/19 6:26 AM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > On 3/5/19 5:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 3/4/19 3:39 PM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE kernel > built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- repo? > > Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and PAE 32-bit kernels, and it's > that step from CentOS 6 32-bit PAE onto CentOS 7 32-bit which made me > stumble, but okay now. > The only reason is .. it is not included in the mainline RHEL 7 kernel source code. The kernel we are using there is our CentOS Plus kernel. The reason it is the CentOS Plus kernel is that the RHEL 7 kernel SPEC does not build anything on i386 except the kernel-headers rpm. We already make modifications to produce a CentOS Plus kernel for x86_64 .. so we also rolled in changes for making that kernel build on i386. Since it does not do PAE by default, we don't do it. CentOS QA team member Akemi Yagi maintains the plus kernels for both CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and QA team member (and armhfp AltArch maintainer) Pablo Greco also helps her frequently to make changes to that kernel to make it work with i386. I have no objections trying to make PAE work with that kernel .. Patches accepted :D https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6828 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.6 kickstart error
On 03/06/2019 07:12 AM, isdtor wrote: > I am testing a CentOS 7.6 kickstart installation. After kickstart was > initiated, > the installation stops at some point where a sort of table is printed under > "Installation", and the item that fails is 4 - Software selection, Error > checking software selection. > > I have checked /tmp/packaging.log and /tmp/anaconda.log, but cannot find any > errors here that would prevent installation. > > Poor error messages, no usable lead for debug. > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > Hi, I have run into this - in my experience it means there is some dependency missing. And you are correct trying to find the error is a PITA. Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] nvidia on 7.6
On 03/02/2019 05:41 AM, Phil Perry wrote: Hi Gerry, I've updated the nvidia 340xx legacy package set for el7.6, and released the packages to the elrepo testing repository. Please could you test them and let me know if they work as expected. To install: yum --enablerepo=elrepo-testing install kmod-nvidia-340xx nvidia-x11-drv-340xx nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-libs if you need 32-bit support then you will also need to install the corresponding nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-libs-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.i686.rpm package. Thinking about it, I'm not sure these packages are going to work as the 340 series NVIDIA driver predates the conversion to GLVND (support was added in version 361), see here: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/915640/multiple-glx-client-libraries-in-the-nvidia-linux-driver-installer-package/ but I have no way to test them so I'll leave that to you. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Phil, I tried to install this and ran into a conflict --> Processing Conflict: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx-340.107-2.el7_6.elrepo.x86_64 conflicts ocl-icd --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: nvidia-x11-drv-340xx conflicts with ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7.x86_64 I removed ocl-icd and installed the package, but needless to say I can't get ocl-icd to install which means that I cant install video players, vlc smplayer mplayer, or ffmpeg-libs. Pete -- Unencumbered by the thought process. -- Click and Clack the Tappet brothers -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOs 7 i386 & PAE Kernel
On 3/5/19 5:48 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 3/4/19 3:39 PM, Mike McTernan (wavemobile) wrote: > > Looking around, I found the following repo: > > https://mirrors.dotsrc.org/centos-altarch/7/kernel/i386/ ... > That directory (kernel/ under altarch) is basically for the armhfp main > kernel, > but we are building also for aarch64, i386 and even x86_64. Its purpose > (other than armhfp, where it is the main kernel) is mainly for IoT type > hardware (think hobby boards, embedded systems, etc that need newer > kernels for hardware support .. think things like this: > > https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/solutions/iot.html > > or > > 64 bit aarch64 bit type IoT boards, etc. > > You certainly CAN use them on anything you want and it will be maintained > as it is the main kernel for armhfp. That’s excellent, and most helpful. So that brings support for newer hardware, AND provides a PAE version which works on all my hardware nicely. This might be useful to a number of people, and it was only through looking around CentOS 7 on Raspberry Pi that I happened across the kernel repo. Might it be worth linking to the repo from the AltArch/i386 page: https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/AltArch/i386 > Both of these branches / repos are NOT designed to run Enterprise type > workloads (that is why we have the main RH kernel from RHEL sources) .. Yep - wise words and duly noted, thank you. My application is small scale, so should be fine. Software is only as good as the testing anyway :-) Last question, if I may - Is there any specific reason why an i686 PAE kernel built from the main RHEL sources isn't in the AltArch i386 os- repo? Notably CentOS 6 provided both non-PAE and PAE 32-bit kernels, and it's that step from CentOS 6 32-bit PAE onto CentOS 7 32-bit which made me stumble, but okay now. Many Thanks again, Mike -- wavemobile Warning: The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete the material from any computer. wavemobile Ltd is registered in England and Wales, Registration Number: 04780898. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS 7.6 kickstart error
I am testing a CentOS 7.6 kickstart installation. After kickstart was initiated, the installation stops at some point where a sort of table is printed under "Installation", and the item that fails is 4 - Software selection, Error checking software selection. I have checked /tmp/packaging.log and /tmp/anaconda.log, but cannot find any errors here that would prevent installation. Poor error messages, no usable lead for debug. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 169, Issue 2
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ...@centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-ow...@centos.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..." Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2019:0436 Moderate CentOS 7 java-11-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) 2. CEBA-2019:0452 CentOS 7 java-1.8.0-openjdk BugFix Update (Johnny Hughes) 3. CESA-2019:0464 Moderate CentOS 7 java-1.7.0-openjdk Security Update (Johnny Hughes) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 00:33:04 + From: Johnny Hughes To: centos-annou...@centos.org Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2019:0436 Moderate CentOS 7 java-11-openjdk Security Update Message-ID: <20190306003304.ga19...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0436 Moderate Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0436 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 455611eda46b23a443562b371b11031c0c7cd755fa461d36c1265aa5ff0581b7 java-11-openjdk-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 2d04a5ed238be61cc3eca8bb760e36ba730bb97a4948d93f8cb1abb23c2efdec java-11-openjdk-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 9382cbbb2e508d3c9af6c2dd464f6a2a54b8f7c4c42abc5a8a5e8afc2c9d1b18 java-11-openjdk-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 3bcbcc3a783c4c9b0ccf5dace193f834657c724d89effeb69ef920b41fb33b93 java-11-openjdk-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 31723eed1292300403a09ff8ad95550bbf37c29a6868a1ad5d911ef711dd50b7 java-11-openjdk-demo-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm b5a6567ecfe5a58f01f53ac30c2eb2c11575efcd17cae90582a51176e4db2498 java-11-openjdk-demo-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 7818ee07653a778293818a02c86eb6a946b7bb826978e243e526fc85340e3dc5 java-11-openjdk-demo-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 979689c0138cce99224c77370217d07a8504b57b25d054987931ff24b6ad5b09 java-11-openjdk-demo-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 1573dc9a08c6d3a39c6cd2f303f0228e498f281f05d7f91692eddeb8bbe19f28 java-11-openjdk-devel-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 18f3a3ac00fbbcb2228d97592fab9d420b1ce0717e7f7aaa4e99dff2794bb9d7 java-11-openjdk-devel-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 86032a3878de01037dcbe81c1d2360a59cbf7db7ec54a9cad9f58eec4c2c6e6b java-11-openjdk-devel-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm f734df7c461a3b68202d0075e3d0089e2d93287e6d0b9679a136534eec1ae77d java-11-openjdk-devel-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 6d5ee0ce4a9537a6066e0dff983969a265946965887b45709490daa08409a4de java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 88e6bd393337cd85c421c0ab6c9f2bdb1846344fe4db8ee38dec4b688bf528cb java-11-openjdk-headless-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 758e1a74d5fb435c5ccc0f4307cc0d2a6112eb242da3da7a86294ae4386b9f88 java-11-openjdk-headless-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 50036b97862857f7f0d60569043bfc762c5eb4ddf7069cbfa8e9bdb56d841166 java-11-openjdk-headless-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 6c6a3d3380df1c070dc230788e25eb50b54f81ffa834d36ce2bf88e38edcf6eb java-11-openjdk-javadoc-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 4e3821a2bba3cfd3dd947359b8cc396e5868bf52946d99f44ea81b9dd825e3b4 java-11-openjdk-javadoc-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 6c881d9c081be6182e821ec3d956f342054201db468abdd87123c1b23495389a java-11-openjdk-javadoc-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 65c8d2eb44491647569d6a37f335e49e941e4bb6f910cb5171bb819194585189 java-11-openjdk-javadoc-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 64050c25f1ea9eca22505264d5b49a3de521f0ca2b82f1dadb8f58f909a74f1e java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm e9d529169e11e3456e6d989385396839301203a1cedf4a7191073d944d015759 java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 14d42846b958e0a458bc47d602817baf8e5e0718cd37b5ede4c19a6b4241ab9d java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 84a5c81828b2e2169f5ab56b13cf9a87ccfa87b17e12c988bf49b60f6e8bd384 java-11-openjdk-javadoc-zip-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 2ea9aa835b7f1da2c775da64c8feb4cc373c795bb06613c76f3284a566a804d4 java-11-openjdk-jmods-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 0719378192a36086f445ae451c6345d018aec419a4f2bbb8744dda201086e524 java-11-openjdk-jmods-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm 9a75948d5575123c33ec0186b4b23f99384a3c6e83a1b95139ed0a23cff3c396 java-11-openjdk-jmods-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm 1bf9787d5c284f5156206ea8ca3fbfdb93a516d1d75b008d52c15d97520c3776 java-11-openjdk-jmods-debug-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.x86_64.rpm cc12b310883fa4d93a221810e81493b96fba379d16c0b1fb6bf7b234df06cebc java-11-openjdk-src-11.0.2.7-0.el7_6.i686.rpm d084163ae25b8e7aa8342bfc8cdbf401c69cae016c9c8e4196dc0f195ef3b297 java-11-openjdk-src-11.0.2.
[CentOS] Network Bridge - error
Hi, I'm new to CentOS. (I have tried Debian, Ubuntu, Devuan & Gentoo). And also new to CloudStack. I'm trying the Quick Installation Guide of CloudStack as pointed by Andrija Panic of ShapeBlue https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/blob/master/source/quickinstallationguide/qig.rst At Configuring the Network topic, I got an error: [root@localhost ~]# systemctl restart network Job for network.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status network.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. systemctl status network.service https://pastebin.com/KzBqJN65 journalctl -xe https://pastebin.com/PLQGuLeR ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
