Re: [CentOS] Versions in RHEL and CentOS

[Thomas Stephen Lee]

On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Johnny Hughes  wrote:

> On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions.
> >
> > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd
> >
> > in the he Notes
> >
> > No (8)
> >
> > says
> >
> > "Update 2 of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"
> >
> > does it mean it will appear in CentOS 8.2, or is already there from 8.0 ?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > --
> > Lee
>
> No, that is 8.0.2 .. which is older than 8.1.
>
> RHEL has several updates within the point release cycle that are just
> normal updates .. we push those as well, but we don't use the 3rd digit.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>

Hi,

Thanks for the information .
Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from Hetzner, but sensors does not show
status of all cores in list, which is why I asked.

thanks.

---
Lee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

[Divine Tanyingoh]

Thanks

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 11:26, Stephen John Smoogen  wrote:

> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Divine Tanyingoh 
> wrote:
>
> > Issue: After installing vms on vmware, I noticed a difference in behavior
> > between centos 6 vs 7. On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a
> > reply without first resolving in the /etc/hosts file by adding a new
> entry:
> > 192.168.0.47  server1.example.com.
> >
> > But for centos 7 I am able to ping the hostname and get a reply even
> when I
> > have not made any changes to the /etc/hosts file. Why is there this
> > difference between centos 6 vs 7.
> >
> >
> That sounds more like a questions for VMware forums than here.. something
> in vmware is populating some sort of 'DNS' for you to do this. I don't know
> of any change in EL6 and EL7 that would do this by itselfd.
>
>
>
> > Thank you for your assistance.
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

[Stephen John Smoogen]

On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 at 13:22, Divine Tanyingoh 
wrote:

> Issue: After installing vms on vmware, I noticed a difference in behavior
> between centos 6 vs 7. On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a
> reply without first resolving in the /etc/hosts file by adding a new entry:
> 192.168.0.47  server1.example.com.
>
> But for centos 7 I am able to ping the hostname and get a reply even when I
> have not made any changes to the /etc/hosts file. Why is there this
> difference between centos 6 vs 7.
>
>
That sounds more like a questions for VMware forums than here.. something
in vmware is populating some sort of 'DNS' for you to do this. I don't know
of any change in EL6 and EL7 that would do this by itselfd.



> Thank you for your assistance.
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>


-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] centos 6 vs 7

[Divine Tanyingoh]

Issue: After installing vms on vmware, I noticed a difference in behavior
between centos 6 vs 7. On centos 6 I cannot ping the hostname and get a
reply without first resolving in the /etc/hosts file by adding a new entry:
192.168.0.47  server1.example.com.

But for centos 7 I am able to ping the hostname and get a reply even when I
have not made any changes to the /etc/hosts file. Why is there this
difference between centos 6 vs 7.

Thank you for your assistance.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Qemu guest(s) in bridge mode cannot see host machine.

[Jerry Geis]

Hi All - I have a Win10 and Centos 8 guest both that bridge mode does not
see the host- other computers seem ok.  They cannot even ping the host.

My host is CentOS 7.

I did some searching - I see the issue - but not what was done to
resolve it ?
Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] mlocate-updatedb.timer not working?

[John Horne]

On Wed, 2020-03-04 at 09:51 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 09:16:16 -0600
> Frank Cox wrote:
>
> > I set this computer up with Centos 8 a few days ago.
> >
> > "systemctl status mlocate-updatedb.timer" says "Active (waiting)".
> >
> > But the mlocate database hasn't been updated since the last time I ran
> > updatedb manually.
>
> Just to follow this up, the mlocate database update started working
> automatically again by magic.  I didn't change anything but it's now updating
> itself daily as expected.
>
Just going through my mail messages, and as a quick reply, if you run
'systemctl list-timers' it will show you when the timer last ran and when it is
next due to run.

No idea as to why yours seemed to stop then start.



John.

--
John Horne | Senior Operations Analyst | Technology and Information Services
University of Plymouth | Drake Circus | Plymouth | Devon | PL4 8AA | UK

[http://www.plymouth.ac.uk/images/email_footer.gif]

This email and any files with it are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the recipient to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient then copying, distribution or other use of the information contained 
is strictly prohibited and you should not rely on it. If you have received this 
email in error please let the sender know immediately and delete it from your 
system(s). Internet emails are not necessarily secure. While we take every 
care, University of Plymouth accepts no responsibility for viruses and it is 
your responsibility to scan emails and their attachments. University of 
Plymouth does not accept responsibility for any changes made after it was sent. 
Nothing in this email or its attachments constitutes an order for goods or 
services unless accompanied by an official order form.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Problem installing bind-dyndb-ldap

[Michal Zacek]

Hello,

is there a way, how to avoid this stupid "module" problem? Google didn't 
help, except it is quite common at Centos 8.1.


[root@centos8 ~]# dnf install bind-dyndb-ldap

.

Running transaction check
No available modular metadata for modular package 
'bind-dyndb-ldap-11.1-14.module_el8.1.0+253+3b90c921.x86_64', it cannot 
be installed on the system


[root@centos8 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
CentOS Linux release 8.1.1911 (Core)

Thanks,
MZa

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Versions in RHEL and CentOS

[Johnny Hughes]

On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions.
> 
> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd
> 
> in the he Notes
> 
> No (8)
> 
> says
> 
> "Update 2 of Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8"
> 
> does it mean it will appear in CentOS 8.2, or is already there from 8.0 ?
> 
> thanks
> 
> --
> Lee

No, that is 8.0.2 .. which is older than 8.1.

RHEL has several updates within the point release cycle that are just
normal updates .. we push those as well, but we don't use the 3rd digit.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos