Re: [CentOS] Apache umask
Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS: On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote: Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations. Still no luck. There has to be a way to get this done. Emmett Hi, what is the original need? Could it be that you can accomplish the desired effect using ACL on particular directories/files? Gianluca Might could, but that seems like overkill for my purposes, as I don't use ACLs anywhere else. I cannot be the only developer that needs apache created files to be managed by a group. The truth is some sites, like wordpress or joomla, can be better managed when a group member can read or write apache created files. Like via SFTP or local FTP. Today, I have to make all files world writable to update joomla, and that could be better managed by allowing the owning group to access those files. In the case where the client manages the site, I have to log into the server and change the permissions every time they update the site. Or even to update most plugins. This is best addressed in the application. For example in wordpress you can set define( 'FS_CHMOD_DIR', ( 0775 & ~ umask() ) ); define( 'FS_CHMOD_FILE', ( 0664 & ~ umask() ) ); Wprdpress sites are better, but even then, I still sometimes need to set and unset explicit file permissions depending on the plugins installed. All this would not be an issue if apache created files with a unask of 002. One simple adjustment to the server to allow us to use normal Linux file permissions to manage files. If I don't find a solution to this I guess I'll have to use your ACL suggestion. It is getting to be pain to manage multiple sites in the current manner. If the application is to dumpy then ACL is your solution. ACL has a default flag that allows setting permissions that gets heritaged. So that files in the future get the right permissions. Surely someone knows how to force apache to use a umask of 002, other than building from source. Not a best practice. -- Leon ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache umask
On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote: Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work. And I've tried many combinations. Still no luck. There has to be a way to get this done. Emmett Hi, what is the original need? Could it be that you can accomplish the desired effect using ACL on particular directories/files? Gianluca Might could, but that seems like overkill for my purposes, as I don't use ACLs anywhere else. I cannot be the only developer that needs apache created files to be managed by a group. The truth is some sites, like wordpress or joomla, can be better managed when a group member can read or write apache created files. Like via SFTP or local FTP. Today, I have to make all files world writable to update joomla, and that could be better managed by allowing the owning group to access those files. In the case where the client manages the site, I have to log into the server and change the permissions every time they update the site. Or even to update most plugins. Wprdpress sites are better, but even then, I still sometimes need to set and unset explicit file permissions depending on the plugins installed. All this would not be an issue if apache created files with a unask of 002. One simple adjustment to the server to allow us to use normal Linux file permissions to manage files. If I don't find a solution to this I guess I'll have to use your ACL suggestion. It is getting to be pain to manage multiple sites in the current manner. Surely someone knows how to force apache to use a umask of 002, other than building from source. Emmett ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] force CUPS print server to fit-to-page
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 11:18, Josh wrote: > > Any other suggestions? Does anyone on this list use CUPS as a print server > for Apple devices or is a CUPS expert? > > Original question: > https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2020-July/351009.html > Usually for CUPS issues, I check to see if a MacOS-X system shows the same problem. If it doesn't then I try to work out what the Mac has set up differently to make it work. This can be from a different PPD to a 'helper' program which does a translation. That is as far as my 'expertise' goes on CUPS these days. > Thank you, > Josh. > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:11 AM Josh wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:18 PM Frank Cox wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:00:19 -0400 > >> Josh wrote: > >> > >> > Does anyone have any ideas? > >> > >> Did you set /etc/papersize? > >> > > > > Initially I did not, because based on > > > > man paperconf > > > > the default paper size is letter. > > Still, after running > > > > sudo paperconfig -p letter > > > > which created /etc/papersize and restarting cups there are no changes. > > > > Josh. > > > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] force CUPS print server to fit-to-page
Any other suggestions? Does anyone on this list use CUPS as a print server for Apple devices or is a CUPS expert? Original question: https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2020-July/351009.html Thank you, Josh. On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 11:11 AM Josh wrote: > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:18 PM Frank Cox wrote: > >> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:00:19 -0400 >> Josh wrote: >> >> > Does anyone have any ideas? >> >> Did you set /etc/papersize? >> > > Initially I did not, because based on > > man paperconf > > the default paper size is letter. > Still, after running > > sudo paperconfig -p letter > > which created /etc/papersize and restarting cups there are no changes. > > Josh. > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 185, Issue 3
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ...@centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
centos-announce-ow...@centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. CESA-2020:2894 Important CentOS 7 dbus Security Update
(Johnny Hughes)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 22:54:19 +
From: Johnny Hughes
To: centos-annou...@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2020:2894 Important CentOS 7 dbus
SecurityUpdate
Message-ID: <20200714225419.ga30...@bstore1.rdu2.centos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:2894 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:2894
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
f88bd838d89563321c366b251cbc62b30192c07f2ae42a69ca4a7bef46cbf389
dbus-1.10.24-14.el7_8.x86_64.rpm
88de47304b6ff5330938b5ca348a52ff5a597d6ccdfbf7c1d033ad30746fdb43
dbus-devel-1.10.24-14.el7_8.i686.rpm
0b6321bbe42291d74c8c395022d9ce20d35d9e81d85b535dbf6d1ae4e4c654b0
dbus-devel-1.10.24-14.el7_8.x86_64.rpm
a5d8ef0e0d92ed6845207edee79fbf1cc317c55aa50557b466245c5c92786595
dbus-doc-1.10.24-14.el7_8.noarch.rpm
5e68a0fbe453f32c67b02836601c285b870a582654db49c0072413e3334a60ac
dbus-libs-1.10.24-14.el7_8.i686.rpm
2ecaa8b312b5996a29300e0203810840f991c8e8399e78156422add72728fa17
dbus-libs-1.10.24-14.el7_8.x86_64.rpm
929c30d3e6104f4086e9ba83d9cf8873a4378aef7e64175986c55382eeb80840
dbus-tests-1.10.24-14.el7_8.x86_64.rpm
1329955ae245ec899ed66ee984e30cecf30a40679f1bd0feff952529cb0fe641
dbus-x11-1.10.24-14.el7_8.x86_64.rpm
Source:
6307a61cdc84308f14a0aa074be87630b23d78f804ecd75b27c73f3a877b7dc6
dbus-1.10.24-14.el7_8.src.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: hughesjr, #cen...@irc.freenode.net
Twitter: @JohnnyCentOS
--
Subject: Digest Footer
___
CentOS-announce mailing list
centos-annou...@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
--
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 185, Issue 3
***
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Apache umask
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > > Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I > had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to > work. And I've tried many combinations. Still no luck. > > There has to be a way to get this done. > > Emmett > > Hi, what is the original need? Could it be that you can accomplish the desired effect using ACL on particular directories/files? Gianluca ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS 8 & HandBrakeCLI
On 13/07/2020 22:38, Tony.Molloy wrote: > On Mon, 2020-07-13 at 08:55 -0400, mail...@toolz.com wrote: >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University >> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you >> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe. >> On 2020-07-13 05:09, Kay Diederichs wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 4:04 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. wrote: Since I upgraded to CentOS8, I cannot get HandBrakeCLI to work: >> >> I could not get HandBrake to work under CentOS 8, so I installed it >> under >> Zorin 15 (an Ubuntu-derived German distro). There, it works >> great. I >> did not try >> any of the other distros derived from Debian or Ubuntu itself. >> >> Todd Merriman >> Software Tooolz, Inc. >> ___ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS@centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos > > HandBrake-1.3.3-1.el8 and HandBrake-gui from RPM Fusion work fine on > CentOS-Stream 8. Haven't tried on CentOS 8. > > Tony Indeed : what I have on my CentOS 8 laptop too and no issue : HandBrake-1.3.3-1.el8.x86_64 HandBrake-gui-1.3.3-1.el8.x86_64 -- Fabian Arrotin gpg key: 17F3B7A1 | twitter: @arrfab signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
