Re: [CentOS] RHSA-2019:1467 not fixed in centos
> On 20 Jun 2019, at 19:34, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Our new build system set up uses mock on CentOS-7 to build CentOS-6 and > CentOS-7 packages .. python seems to fail with that setup. > > I was able to build it in mock on a CentOS-6 machine just fine .. so I > will release it today along with the libvirt update: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1578 > > In fact, those are going through CI testing right now .. if they pass > they should be on mirror.centos.org in about an hour. Thanks Johnny, i see the packages have come through. There was an issue with software collections being missed as well but that seems to have fixed itself yesterday as i see that the software collections are now updated as well. Thanks again for looking into this, - Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] RHSA-2019:1467 not fixed in centos
> On 19 Jun 2019, at 16:53, mark wrote: > > I see this in the build log, right about the end: > > RPM build errors: >File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-2.6.6-68.el6_10.x86_64/usr/lib64/python2.6/lib-dynload/ossaudiodev.so >File not found: > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-2.6.6-68.el6_10.x86_64/usr/lib64/python2.6/plat-linux2 > > Hope this helps. That is weird, it builds for me without errors in my local mock setup. - Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] RHSA-2019:1467 not fixed in centos
Hi It seems the fix for CVE-2019-9636 has slipped through the cracks as the SRPM has not been rebuilt and made available for CentOS 6. https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-9636 https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:1467 Kind Regards, Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Where can I find the 6.10 centos-release srpm?
On 05/07/2018 13:34, Johnny Hughes wrote: I pushed the 3 SRPMs that are not in CR to: http://vault.centos.org/6.10/os/Source/SPackages/ They should be there in a few minutes (after the master mirror syncs out to the rest of the vault mirrors). All the other new SRPMS should be available from : http://vault.centos.org/6.9/cr/Source/SPackages/ It seems some srpms are still missing in both CR and the 6.10 source directories. An example of the missing srpms is anaconda. Any timelines on when the full srpms will hit the mirrors ? - A ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Who's eating our bandwidth?
Since your users are just in one country you could limit access to only that country using either geoip for apache or geoip for iptables. On 04 Nov 2009, at 11:16 AM, Niki Kovacs wrote: Hi, I've recently setup a new server for our public libraries. For the last two years, this has been my first big job, since it involves networking eleven small to medium size public libraries. There was a hiccup some time ago when the administration hiring me wanted to do it on their own, but it took them less than two weeks to get the server hacked and lose everything. So they decided to hire me back :o) I've rented a little dedicated server at the french provider Ikoula. Really a small thing, a KVM amounting to 1/2 a processor core, 512 MB RAM and 25 GB of disk space. Usually there should be no more than like ten people working simultaneously on the library management software (running atop MySQL). For the last few days, users reported that the install was terribly slow. I checked, and indeed, the application took quite some time to respond. First thing, I wonder if the configuration I chose is too modest for the setup. Then, I took a peek in /var/log/httpd and the *-access.log files show quite some activity. Some haphazard whois on various IP addresses show me that these are no library users from around here. Like: Bogota?!? Peking?!? And quite some search engines. Since I don't need search engines for our application, I'm going to have to find a way to banish these. The log files are not very handy to decipher, so I googled a bit, and I think today I'm going to check out AWStats, which seems to be the right thing to use in that case. I'm also wondering about activity on other ports, but here also I'm taking stabs in the dark. Probably SSH, but I don't know where eventual failed attempts get logged. I also googled a bit, and I think in this domain, fail2ban will be my next experiment. I have this strange feeling that the next step in the wise direction consists in describing my ignorance :o) Any suggestions? Cheers from the sunny south of France, Niki ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
On 07 Aug 2009, at 8:14 AM, Marcus Moeller wrote: (like the Contrib repo) are getting a bit clearer so I guess we are on the right track. Contib repo !!! What Contrib repo ? The last time i tried to contribute i was told to head on to Fedora or rpmforge. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS Project Infrastructure
So is it contrib repo or my buddies repo ? All we are asking is put in place the mechanisms to vet the reputation. The project can not be a true community project when there are no mechanisms for contribution. On 07 Aug 2009, at 9:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: That was in response to Johnny's comment about having to personally know ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Network guru please help: baffled by missing file
On 17 Jul 2009, at 3:48 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: Stephen Harris wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 01:14:26PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: The mirrorlist entry in my Fedora-11 /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora- update.repo [...] Any and all suggestions gratefully received. This is a list for CentOS, not Fedora. You'll get better help if you post to the right lists :-) Sorry, I should have said that my server is running Centos-5.3. If there is a problem on my system, it is at the server. I ran wget on the server, and got the same result. I also get the same result for EPEL: - [...@helen ~]$ sudo yum update Loaded plugins: downloadonly, fastestmirror, priorities, protect- packages, protectbase Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile Could not retrieve mirrorlist http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5arch=x86_64 error was [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Not Found Error: Cannot find a valid baseurl for repo: epel - using the mirrorlist line in /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo : mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=epel-5arch=$basearchkk Also wget fails similarly: - [...@helen ~]$ wget http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist --14:43:39-- http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist Resolving mirrors.fedoraproject.org... 209.132.176.122 Connecting to mirrors.fedoraproject.org|209.132.176.122|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 14:43:39 ERROR 404: Not Found. - This machine is running x86_64 CentOS: - [...@helen ~]$ cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS release 5.3 (Final) It does work for me i get the mirrorlist when i request the url in a browser. Try a different host (from the ip's below) as that is a round robin address mirrors.fedoraproject.org is an alias for wildcard.fedoraproject.org. wildcard.fedoraproject.org has address 66.35.62.166 wildcard.fedoraproject.org has address 80.239.156.215 wildcard.fedoraproject.org has address 152.46.7.222 wildcard.fedoraproject.org has address 209.132.176.120 - -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: errors building packages from src.rpm (trying to rebuild RHELIPA)
I suspect it is a problem with the spec file under the %files section.
On 06 Jul 2009, at 10:59 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to rebuild RHELIPA packages downloaded from ftp.redhat.com
. All goes ok except from python-psycopg2 package. When I try to
rebuild, gives me these errors:
+ exit 0
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) = 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) = 4.0-1
Requires: python-psycopg2 = 2.0.6-1
Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/
python-psycopg2-2.0.6-1-root-carlos
RPM build errors:
user brewbuilder does not exist - using root
group brewbuilder does not exist - using root
user brewbuilder does not exist - using root
group brewbuilder does not exist - using root
File not found by glob: /var/tmp/python-psycopg2-2.0.6-1-root-
carlos/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/psycopg2/*.pyc
File not found by glob: /var/tmp/python-psycopg2-2.0.6-1-root-
carlos/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/psycopg2/*.pyo
If I go to /var/tmp/python-psycopg2-2.0.6-1-root-carlos/usr/lib64/
python2.4/site-packages/psycopg2/ directory, it is right: there
isn't exists any *.pyc or .pyo file ... Maybe be the problem is
in .spec file?? somebody have this problem??
--
CL Martinez
carlopmart {at} gmail {d0t} com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dag's comment at linuxtag
On 30 Jun 2009, at 9:46 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote: The aim was to create platform, not strictly focused on enterprise. We wanted create something mixed. Something with enterprise, testing, backport levels and efforts. The project has been started but never really haven't happened. I'll go on the record as being willing to volunteer to help with a distribution/version neutral repo. Such a thing would benefit my business. Is anyone currently leading this project? I am willing to help too, the problems is the barriers to entry on the Centos side seem quite high, there is no published guidelines on how to contribute. On the Fedora/EPEL side how ever there are published guidelines and mechanisms to allow people who want to contribute to get in. Anyway thats my too cents. - Geoff Galitz Blankenheim NRW, Germany http://www.galitz.org/ http://german-way.com/blog/ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openldap 5.1 crashing
You need to run db_recover on the db files ? On 08 May 2009, at 6:29 PM, Agnello George wrote: Hi One of our server opneldap seems to crash ... following is info about my ldap. nss_ldap-253-3 php-ldap-5.1.6-5.el5 openldap-2.4.11-1.3.el5 openldap-servers-2.4.11-1.3.el5 compat-openldap-2.4.11_2.3.27-1.3.el5 openldap-clients-2.4.11-1.3.el5 openldap-devel-2.4.11-1.3.el5 And m getting error on command slapcat [root@ ldap]# slapcat bdb_db_open: DB_CONFIG for suffix o=nerv_ldap has changed. Performing database recovery to activate new settings. bdb_db_open: database o=nerv_ldap: recovery skipped in read-only mode. Run manual recovery if errors are encountered. bdb(o=nerv_ldap): Logging region out of memory; you may need to increase its size bdb_db_open: database o=nerv_ldap: db_open(/var/lib/ldap/ id2entry.bdb) failed: Cannot allocate memory (12). backend_startup_one: bi_db_open failed! (12) slap_startup failed has any one faced any similar issue !! . Thanks a million -- Regards Agnello D'souza ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bash Script help...
The ABS guide http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/ and the GNU bash manual http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/ should help On 08 May 2009, at 6:58 PM, MHR wrote: On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 10:12 PM, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com wrote: Hi All, I need to write a script that I will manually start (or a cron job in future) but I need it to do a number of things in order one after another. How do i do that so everything gets dont as the steps depend on each other. If you're asking these kinds of questions, a basic primer on how to use bash, and shell scripting in general, seems to be in order. It never hurts to have good manuals around if you are not thoroughly familiar with a particular paradigm, and it makes for handy reference in the future. You will (and did) get lots of help here, but you'll run into more and mroe of this as you go, and these kinds of issues are frequently covered in detail in a good manual. FTR, no, I don't use a shell manual any more. I've been writing shell and make scripts for over 20 years, and I still occasionally use the man page for details that elude me from time to time. Man has been a great tool for me, for this. HTH mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] SSH problems - command not found
On 06 May 2009, at 10:57 AM, Marcelo M. Garcia wrote: George Alexandru Dudău wrote: Hi All, I have a strange problem with ssh on CentOS 5.3: 1. I make a ssh connection from computer X to Y = OK 2. When i try to conect from Y to Z i receive a strange message: -bash: ssh: command not found (normal and root user) #which sshd /usr/sbin/sshd The sshd daemon it's on (see nr.1) So connection to Y it's OK, but from Y to another computer don't. Even back to X don't work Any advice? Thank you! P.S - sorry for my bad english ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Hi I also think you have some packages missing. In my CentOS-5.3, I have the following packages: # rpm -qa | grep ssh: openssh-4.3p2-29.el5 openssh-clients-4.3p2-29.el5 openssh-server-4.3p2-29.el5 openssh-askpass-4.3p2-29.el5 Regards mg. SSH client is at /usr/bin/ssh it seems there is a problem with your $PATH if /usr/bin is not in the PATH. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux
Hi
Dovecot is trying to open a socket, and procmail is trying to execute
spamc, You should be able to fix these issues using audit2allow.
Andrew.
On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:07 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest
version of CentOS and all current patch files.
For most applications I selected the default options. By doing this
I expected that the packages would play nice with one another and I
could customize as necessary.
Setting SELinux to enforce I encountered all sorts of problems - but
most were resolvable, save for Dovecot, Procmail (for spamc), and an
odd one with Apache.
Given that these were all installed with the CentOS install
defaults, I can't believe I am the only one with these issues but
finding a solution has not been self evident. Hoping someone here
can help.
For Dovecot I get the following:
SELinux is preventing dovecot (dovecot_t) create to Unknown
(dovecot_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
e1b070ab-586a-4c5a-befe-b6a46b9ab992
For procmail I get the following:
SELinux is preventing procmail (procmail_t) execute to ./spamc
(spamc_exec_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
0a554689-4948-4edf-9964-dddbfe6a2492
SELinux is preventing sh (procmail_t) read to ./spamc
(spamc_exec_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
1f1ebd83-412d-4e93-a36f-6f3d34c663df
For Apache it's even more strange - When started I get:
Syntax error on line 283 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
DocumentRoot must be directory
But it is a directory, has the correct permissions and I have even
run chcon -R -h -t httpd_sys_content_t /web/www/ in an effort to
correct the problem. I run a virtual server too, and in trying to
find a fix for this that may be a problem - but first things first.
All the other issues I had I could resolve when I ran the specified
sealert tag and followed the suggested instructions - but those
above don't budge. When I go to the fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-
fq-fc5 site to take on making a local policy module I am quickly
getting lost . The option to simply disable SElinux with respect
to Apache, Dovecote or anything else is suggested - but not
something I see in the GUI window, and I have not figured out how to
do it from the command line.
Again, because these are default packages, I hope that someone else
knows how to resolve these.
With respect to the to reports from SELinux regarding Dovecot and
promail, here is a bit more info:
The info and Raw Audit message for dovecot_t is:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
Target Contextsystem_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
Target ObjectsNone [ socket ]
Sourcedovecot
Source Path /usr/sbin/dovecot
Port Unknown
Host trailrunner
Source RPM Packages dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5
Target RPM Packages
Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-203.el5
Selinux Enabled True
Policy Type targeted
MLS Enabled True
Enforcing ModeEnforcing
Plugin Name catchall
Host Name trailrunner
Platform Linux trailrunner
2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Wed
Apr 1 10:38:05 EDT 2009 i686 athlon
Alert Count 2
First SeenWed Apr 29 15:39:51 2009
Last Seen Wed Apr 29 15:47:31 2009
Local ID e1b070ab-586a-4c5a-befe-b6a46b9ab992
Line Numbers
Raw Audit Messages
host=trailrunner type=AVC msg=audit(1241041651.976:33): avc:
denied { create } for pid=3884 comm=dovecot
scontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 tclass=socket
host=trailrunner type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241041651.976:33):
arch=4003 syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf851070
a2=9e45030 a3=3e1 items=0 ppid=3883 pid=3884 auid=4294967295 uid=0
gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none)
ses=4294967295 comm=dovecot exe=/usr/sbin/dovecot
subj=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 key=(null)
The Raw Audit Message for Procmail is:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:procmail_t:s0
Target Contextsystem_u:object_r:spamc_exec_t:s0
Target Objects./spamc [ file ]
Sourceprocmail
Source Path /usr/bin/procmail
Port Unknown
Host trailrunner
Source RPM Packages procmail-3.22-17.1.el5.centos
Target RPM Packages
Re: [CentOS] Defaults of CentOS Install not working with SELinux
The audit.log should contain more detail than is being provided here,
if it is a unix socket you should see the path, i suspect it is the
unix socket not the tcp sockets (pop3/imap)
On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:50 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Ok, but how?
There appear to be a lot of different options when employing
audit2allow and I am reluctant to start blazing away trying
different elements. I am missing the details of what socket an dhow
the execution is occuring so that I can begin to develop the proper
audit2allow sequence.
On Apr 30, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Andrew Colin Kissa wrote:
Hi
Dovecot is trying to open a socket, and procmail is trying to
execute spamc, You should be able to fix these issues using
audit2allow.
Andrew.
On 30 Apr 2009, at 4:07 PM, Dan Roberts wrote:
Following a hard drive corruption I have reinstalled the latest
version of CentOS and all current patch files.
For most applications I selected the default options. By doing
this I expected that the packages would play nice with one another
and I could customize as necessary.
Setting SELinux to enforce I encountered all sorts of problems -
but most were resolvable, save for Dovecot, Procmail (for spamc),
and an odd one with Apache.
Given that these were all installed with the CentOS install
defaults, I can't believe I am the only one with these issues but
finding a solution has not been self evident. Hoping someone here
can help.
For Dovecot I get the following:
SELinux is preventing dovecot (dovecot_t) create to Unknown
(dovecot_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
e1b070ab-586a-4c5a-befe-b6a46b9ab992
For procmail I get the following:
SELinux is preventing procmail (procmail_t) execute to ./spamc
(spamc_exec_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
0a554689-4948-4edf-9964-dddbfe6a2492
SELinux is preventing sh (procmail_t) read to ./spamc
(spamc_exec_t). For complete SELinux messages. run sealert -l
1f1ebd83-412d-4e93-a36f-6f3d34c663df
For Apache it's even more strange - When started I get:
Syntax error on line 283 of /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
DocumentRoot must be directory
But it is a directory, has the correct permissions and I have even
run chcon -R -h -t httpd_sys_content_t /web/www/ in an effort to
correct the problem. I run a virtual server too, and in trying to
find a fix for this that may be a problem - but first things first.
All the other issues I had I could resolve when I ran the
specified sealert tag and followed the suggested instructions -
but those above don't budge. When I go to the fedora.redhat.com/
docs/selinux-fq-fc5 site to take on making a local policy module I
am quickly getting lost . The option to simply disable SElinux
with respect to Apache, Dovecote or anything else is suggested -
but not something I see in the GUI window, and I have not figured
out how to do it from the command line.
Again, because these are default packages, I hope that someone
else knows how to resolve these.
With respect to the to reports from SELinux regarding Dovecot and
promail, here is a bit more info:
The info and Raw Audit message for dovecot_t is:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
Target Contextsystem_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
Target ObjectsNone [ socket ]
Sourcedovecot
Source Path /usr/sbin/dovecot
Port Unknown
Host trailrunner
Source RPM Packages dovecot-1.0.7-7.el5
Target RPM Packages
Policy RPMselinux-policy-2.4.6-203.el5
Selinux Enabled True
Policy Type targeted
MLS Enabled True
Enforcing ModeEnforcing
Plugin Name catchall
Host Name trailrunner
Platform Linux trailrunner
2.6.18-128.1.6.el5xen #1 SMP Wed
Apr 1 10:38:05 EDT 2009 i686 athlon
Alert Count 2
First SeenWed Apr 29 15:39:51 2009
Last Seen Wed Apr 29 15:47:31 2009
Local ID e1b070ab-586a-4c5a-befe-b6a46b9ab992
Line Numbers
Raw Audit Messages
host=trailrunner type=AVC msg=audit(1241041651.976:33): avc:
denied { create } for pid=3884 comm=dovecot
scontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:dovecot_t:s0 tclass=socket
host=trailrunner type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241041651.976:33):
arch=4003 syscall=102 success=no exit=-13 a0=1 a1=bf851070
a2=9e45030 a3=3e1 items=0 ppid=3883 pid=3884 auid=4294967295 uid=0
gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none)
ses=4294967295 comm=dovecot exe=/usr
Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev
On 20 Apr 2009, at 3:31 PM, John Austin wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet. Always good to keep boxes updated, for security and stability reasons. http://forums.olm.net/showthread.php?t=2137 I posted the above Saturday night and there was very little activity in this mailing list over the weekend. Anyone using Apache on CentOS 5, heads up! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Lanny, I just killed the udevd on my two servers and await the update What are you looking for? Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos New udev just arrived - I assume this the fix !! udev-095-14.20.el5_3.x86_64.rpm Yep thats the fix but according to upstream you need to update libvolume_id as well. John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev
On 20 Apr 2009, at 3:39 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: John Austin wrote: On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote: Lanny Marcus wrote: On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus lmmailingli...@gmail.com wrote: I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet. Always good to keep boxes updated, for security and stability reasons. http://forums.olm.net/showthread.php?t=2137 I posted the above Saturday night and there was very little activity in this mailing list over the weekend. Anyone using Apache on CentOS 5, heads up! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Lanny, I just killed the udevd on my two servers and await the update What are you looking for? Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos New udev just arrived - I assume this the fix !! udev-095-14.20.el5_3.x86_64.rpm John ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos Just did the upgrade on one of my servers, however, udev is one of those items that starts right at the beginning of boot up, and has no init script to stop and start it, so I guess a total reboot is required?? According to the RHEL errata the udevd daemon automatically gets restarted on installing the update. https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0427.html rkampen.vcf___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] OT: Smar Phone/PDA Reco
The BB bold does have VPN support at least i have tried the Cisco VPN concentrator connection and it works. I have not tested the other VPN's On 03 Apr 2009, at 11:43 PM, Scott Silva wrote: I can ssh from my blackberry, but no vpn that I can find ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
