Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-19 Thread Ausmus, Matt
 -Original Message-
 From: Todd Denniston [mailto:todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil]
 Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:43 AM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm
 
 Ausmus, Matt wrote, On 10/18/2010 01:11 PM:
  Howdy,
 
 
 SNIP
 
  We’ve found the problem is generally caused by the time being out
 of
   sync between the servers or the dhcpd daemon on one of the boxes
 dies.
 
 
 NTP does not keep them closely enough synchronized?
 OH, and in case you were not aware of it, you could run NTP on one of
 them using local clock if you
 don't have a good trust able time server available for some reason.
 Also making your DHCP machines
 NTP peers would be good too.
 
 Or are you talking about some other type of time?
 
 --
 Todd Denniston
 Crane Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC Crane)
 Harnessing the Power of Technology for the Warfighter

I think the problem we have/had was related to a Layer 8 issue.  I have student 
workers build our DHCP servers from specifications that I give them.  What more 
than likely happened was that dhcpdate wasn't run on the boxes when they were 
first built causing the date  time to be off and ntpd having issues getting 
the time back in line.  My understanding of how ntpd works is that if the time 
is off too much it sees the time difference as irrational and is not able to 
pull it back in line.  Once I run ntpdate on those boxes the issues go away and 
ntpd is able to maintain the time sync fine.

Matt Ausmus
Network Administrator
Chapman University

Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
-Bucy’s Law
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] using a Laptop as a KVM console?

2010-10-18 Thread Ausmus, Matt
I had the same thought a couple years ago.  I found a device from a
company out of the UK called Epiphan.  They make a small box that
connects via usb 2.0 (required) and acts as a KVM.  Essentially it
streams across USB.  They make drivers for both Windows and Mac and they
have a Linux SDK but will build a Linux client for you based on the
kernel you're running.  They're working on having a production Linux
client but it isn't there yet.

I've used it for both Windows and Mac.  I find connecting to a Windows
server is troublesome but it works great on Linux CLI.  This has become
my crash cart.  The company have been very aggressive developing the
software for it and are very responsive to problems you encounter.
We've had really good success with it.  It does have a few quirks but
nothing insurmountable and we're budgeting to purchase one for each
admin.

http://www.epiphan.com/products/other-applications/kvm2usb/



Matt Ausmus
Network Administrator
Chapman University
635 West Palm Street
Orange, CA  92868
(714)628-2738
maus...@chapman.edu
 
Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
-Bucy's Law 
-Original Message-
From: Rudi Ahlers [mailto:r...@softdux.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 10:32 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] using a Laptop as a KVM console?

Hi all,

Has anyone seen something like this before:

I want to use a laptop as a KVM console. Basically when a technician
goes to one of our datacentres, or clients he has to look for a free
LCD, keyboard  mouse to connect to a server (no network access,
reinstall, troubleshoot failed kernel / HDD, etc). And then hopefully
there's an open power socker in that cabinet.

So I'm thinking why not just use a laptop instead? It already has an
LCD, keyboard, mouse  power. Surely someone has, or may still, build
something that could connect to the laptop's USB port(s) and then to
the server's VGA  USB / PS2 ports, then act as a KVM?

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-18 Thread Ausmus, Matt
Howdy,

 

Yeah, this issue’s been brought up in the past.  One of the maintainer of FC 13 
made the srpm available (I believe he prepped the spec file) for RHEL/CentOS 5 
for dhcpd 4.1.  We started looking at it and the problems are the dependencies 
and the dependencies of the dependencies.  There are no srpms or rpms for those 
and the project becomes a real monster.  

 

We’ve found the problem is generally caused by the time being out of sync 
between the servers or the dhcpd daemon on one of the boxes dies.  To mitigate 
this problem we’ve setup custom Nagios alerts which utilize dhcping to alert us 
when a dhcpd process dies.  We’ve also setup custom scripts that will restart 
the dead process on the box.  So, we’re just waiting for CentOS 6 to be 
released.

 



Matt Ausmus

Network Administrator

Chapman University

635 West Palm Street

Orange, CA  92868

(714)628-2738

maus...@chapman.edu mailto:maus...@chapman.edu 

 

Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.

-Bucy’s Law

From: Waleed Harbi [mailto:waleed.ha...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 1:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

 

Try find-out SPEC file and rpm source, recompile it, this is the faster way I 
think, if you have big issue. 

 

Fedora they released 4.1, check it. 

 

http://mirrors.isu.net.sa/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/dhclient-4.1.1-15.fc13.x86_64.rpm

 

--
Best Wishes,
Waleed Harbi

Dream | Do | Be 



On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:44 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:

JohnS wrote:

 On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:58 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
 Folks,

We've been having occasional issues with failover dhcpd. I went
 looking for peer holds all free leases, and happened to run across
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?format=multipleid=610219,
 which is rated important, and is supposed to be fixed in 3.0.5-24.
 Looking at the repo at kernel.org, all I see is what we have,
 dhclient-3.0.5-23.el5.x86_64.rpm.

Any idea when this update will be released?

 ---
 Bother to even look on Upstreams Site?  It's not freely available yet as
 I see it.

No, I hadn't. I'm just a tad surprised - that was rated important, and
looked as though it would be released soon. And with 6 coming soon, I was
thinking, though I haven't gone to look, that they'd have 3.1 or 4.x.

Thanks, though.

   mark


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] iptables

2010-09-20 Thread Ausmus, Matt
When I was first learning iptables, I found Rusty's Remarkably
Unreliable Guides to be an excellent resource on how iptables works.
He covers each part of iptables and does it in a clear and easy to
understand manner.  If I remember correctly, the guides are also
entertaining.

http://people.netfilter.org/~rusty/unreliable-guides/

I personally don't like any of the GUIs out there.  I find them to be
way to constricting compared to the sheer power and flexibility of
iptables.  You're better off going through the guide and googling and
then just writing your rules in a text editor.


Matt Ausmus
Network Administrator
Chapman University
635 West Palm Street
Orange, CA  92868
(714)628-2738
maus...@chapman.edu
 
Nothing is ever accomplished by a reasonable man.
-Bucy's Law 
-Original Message-
From: Robert Spangler [mailto:mli...@zoominternet.net] 
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 9:39 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables

On Thursday 16 September 2010 16:03, alexus wrote:

  I'm trying to do some simple tcp port forwarding

The first thing you need to do is drop the RH-firewall BS and create a
new 
firewall rule set setup for your needs.  If you don't know how to setup
a 
firewall then I would suggest you get one of those GUI programs that can
do 
this for you.

  [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]# curl --verbose http://10.52.208.221:80
  * About to connect() to 10.52.208.221 port 80
  *   Trying 10.52.208.221... Connection refused
  * couldn't connect to host
  * Closing connection #0
  curl: (7) couldn't connect to host
  [r...@wcmisdlin02 ~]#

Looks like this host doesn't accept port 80 connections.


-- 

Regards
Robert

Linux
The adventure of a life time.

Linux User #296285
Get Counted
http://counter.li.org/

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] DHCP server 4.x rpm?

2010-09-03 Thread Ausmus, Matt
Hi all,

 

Has anyone built an rpm for DHCP server 4.x for CentOS 5 or used a
Fedora rpm?  Anyone using dhcpd 4.x on 5.5 and can give me a heads up on
any pitfalls that I need to be aware of?

 

Thanks in advance.



Matt Ausmus

Network Administrator

Chapman University

635 West Palm Street

Orange, CA  92868

(714)628-2738

maus...@chapman.edu mailto:maus...@chapman.edu 

 

We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of
course, powerful muscles, but no personality.

- Albert Einstein

 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central network installation server?

2010-02-19 Thread Ausmus, Matt
If you want to invest a little extra time you can install Spacewalk (the
open source version of Red Hat's Satellite) which has Cobbler built into
it plus it provides centralized management of your devices both for
monitoring services as well as being able to deploy config files,
updates , etc.  It provides a nice clean interface for Cobbler and it is
fully integrated into it.

Installing just Cobbler is definitely the quick way to get this going
but taking the time to deploy Spacewalk (especially if you manage lots
of servers) is worth the effort.  We've been running it for less than a
year and we're very happy with it.


Matt Ausmus
Network Administrator
Chapman University
635 West Palm Street
Orange, CA  92868
(714)628-2738
maus...@chapman.edu
 
What the gods get away with, the cows don't.
-THE AQUINAS AXIOM
-Original Message-
From: Fernando Gleiser [mailto:ferglei...@yahoo.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 11:13 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central network
installation server?

- Original Message 

 From: Marcelo M. Garcia marcelo.maia.gar...@googlemail.com
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Sent: Thu, February 18, 2010 7:16:45 AM
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] best practice: how to setup a central network
installation server?
 
 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
  
  
  
  
  
  kickstart file, if you are familiar with text based
configurations?
  
  Is kickstart REALLY the only way? 
  
  How do I configure the server so that the client can use network
boot, 
  without a CD?
 
 Hi
 
 You can use PXE. You have to set up a tftp and a DHCP server.
Sometimes 
 you have to enable PXE in the BIOS - I always to do this with Dell
machines.


Install cobbler, it makes building a netinstall server as easy as 1 2 3

cobbler handles pxe, dhcp, http repo setup, kickstart  and such. 

I've used it many times, it takes less than 15 minutes from yum install
cobbler  to the start of the network installs of the client machines.

Once you set it up, just power on the client machine and watch it
install automagically 


Fer


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] ntop from rpmforge

2009-12-10 Thread Ausmus, Matt
I don't know why I haven't signed up for this list before since we use
CentOS all over the place.  The list is very useful and it is good for
me to participate and give back to the community.

 

Anywho, I wanted to post this response to a thread that was created back
in November 2008 about the ntop daemon failing to start.  I'm currently
setting up ntop as a NetFlow  SFlow collector and came across the
issue.  A quick refresher, the init script for ntop has an issue where
it can't parse the ntop.conf file correctly if switches are entered
before the @/etc/ntop.conf.  The suggested work around was to move the
-d -L switches from in front of the @/etc/ntop.conf and put them
behind it.  This is definitely the fix.  There is a caveat to that and I
haven't found anyone that has mentioned it so I thought I would.
According to the documentation, if you add the switches after the
@/etc/ntop.conf those will override the configurations in the
ntop.conf file.  While this isn't an issue with the -d option, if you
decide to use a custom syslog level and add it to the conf file, the
-L switch after the conf file will override your custom log facility.
In my init file I left the -d but removed the -L expecting me to put
my own syslog entry in the conf file.

 



Matt Ausmus

Network Administrator

Chapman University

635 West Palm Street

Orange, CA  92868

(714)628-2738

maus...@chapman.edu mailto:maus...@chapman.edu 

 

Man will occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of the time he
will pick himself up and continue on.

- Churchill's Commentary on Man

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos