Re: [CentOS] Wheel and YUM!!
In a flurry of recycled electrons Plant, Dean wrote: All my sudoers lines that call groups like he was trying to do always have a !SU, !SHELLS to specifically deny root access. Anyway I will shut up now as none of this will help fix his problem. If you ever grant someone ALL commands and then try and restrict them from getting a root shell your fighting a loosing battle. Vi/Vim as root can bang out to a root shell, more can bang out to a root shell, and what's to stop someone from writing a shell script and executing it as root? You may already have this covered and I'm not directing this specifically at your post, but I've seen some really poorly written sudoers files that open up huge holes. I know this isn't contributing either so I'm going to lunch! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Yogunluk
In a flurry of recycled electrons Ross S. W. Walker wrote: Somebody needs to remove this guy from the list. There is some dumb auto-reply rule either him or one of his sophomoric co-workers setup on his mail client. Mailenable. The four auto-replies to his auto-reply was great! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] mail_always fails in CentOS 5
I'm using the same sudoers file for all hosts. Out of 35 hosts, 14 are CentOS 5, the rest are CentOS 4. There are mixtures of MTA's on both platforms but the behavior is consistent. Here is the snip of my sudoers: Defaults mail_always Defaults mailto=[EMAIL PROTECTED] Works fine in CentOS 4, doesn't even produce a blip in the maillog in CentOS 5 on all servers. Outbound mail tested and working on all boxes. Does anyone else see this behavior? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
