Re: [CentOS] fstab, unusual behavior of "missing UUID"

2013-07-06 Thread John Austin 
On Sat, 2013-07-06 at 10:40 -0500, Joseph Hesse wrote:
> I have the following as the last line of my /etc/fstab file on a 
> computer running CentOS6.4..
> 
> UUID=3b550884-8d05-41a5-a205-17b6d7269dd1 /mnt ext3 
> rw,suid,dev,exec,noauto,nouser,async  0  2
> 
> The UUID refers to an ext3 partition of a removable USB drive.
> 
> If the USB drive is not plugged into the computer the computer will not 
> boot.  It seems that this is the incorrect behavior since "noauto" means 
> there is nothing to mount.
> 
> I noticed this situation since an almost identical /etc/fstab on a 
> Fedora 18 computer will boot without the USB drive being plugged in.
> 
> The reason this is important to me is that I want to plug my USB drive 
> into a running computer and then mount it with "# mount /mnt" so I can 
> do backups.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joe Hesse
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Add nofail option ?

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

2013-03-05 Thread John Austin 

On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 10:28 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Fred Smith wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 08:45:40AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >> > Behalf Of Fred Smith
> >> >
> >> > Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or at least I
> >> > don't see it anywhere.
> >> >
> >> > Anybody know otherwise?
> 
> >> What would be the advantage running having this software in 64b?
> >
> > the "advantage" would be the diff between having it and not, as opposed
> > to having it in 64-bit versus 32-bit.
> 
> Adobe *does* have a 64-bit repo. Install it as follows:
> 
> rpm -ivh
> http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/adobe-release/adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch.rpm
> 
> and enjoy.
> 
> mark
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



This is from a Fedora 18 machine - I believe it will be the same
for Centos but I have not tried !


I have both i386 and x86_64 repos configured and I cannot see
x86_64 version of AdobeReader


ja@minix ~ 1$ repoquery -a --repoid=adobe-linux-x86_64
adobe-release-x86_64-0:1.0-1.noarch
flash-plugin-0:11.2.202.273-release.x86_64


ja@minix ~ 2$ repoquery -a --repoid=adobe-linux-i386
...
AdobeReader_deu-0:9.4.2-1.i486
AdobeReader_enu-0:9.5.4-1.i486
AdobeReader_esp-0:8.1.7-1.i486
...
adobe-release-i386-0:1.0-1.noarch
flash-plugin-0:11.2.202.273-release.i386
--

I do get confused by the names of the rpm files though

[root@minix:~]$ yumdownloader AdobeReader_enu
down loads
AdbeRdr9.5.4-1_i486linux_enu.rpm

which when it is installed becomes this
AdobeReader_enu-9.5.4-1.i486
NOT
AdobeReader_enu-0:9.5.4-1.i486

[root@minix:~]$ rpm -qa|grep -i adobe
AdobeReader_enu-9.5.4-1.i486
adobe-release-i386-1.0-1.noarch
adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-13.fc18.x86_64
adobe-release-x86_64-1.0-1.noarch
--
Direct download of AdbeRdr9.5.4-1_i486linux_enu.rpm also works
wget
http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/i386/AdbeRdr9.5.4-1_i486linux_enu.rpm


John




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] make /home/user without all the maps

2012-09-26 Thread John Austin 
On Wed, 2012-09-26 at 12:13 +0100, Nux! wrote:
> On 26.09.2012 11:30, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I would like to make a whole lot of homedirs without Documents,
> > Downloads , 
> > like it was in CentOs5.
> >
> > I know I have to adapt something in /etc/skel but cannot find out how 
> > to
> > do it.
> >
> > Anyone can give me a hand with this?
> >
> > greetings , J.
> 
> Hello Johan,
> 
> Those directories are not from /etc/skel, I believe Gnome creates them, 
> however I do no know how atm.
> Only issuing a "useradd" command will not create those directories.
> 
Maybe

yum remove xdg-user-dirs-gtk

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Best way to duplicate a live Centos 5 server?

2012-07-09 Thread John Austin 
On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 09:00 -0700, aurfalien wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2012, at 10:34 PM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
> 
> > On 7/9/12, Micky  wrote:
> >> The best and traditional way that has been there for decades is an rsync
> >> and then reinstallation of boot-loader.
> >> It works always if you know how it's done.
> > 
> > The problem I found with rsync is that it is very slow when there are
> > a lot of small files. Any idea how this can be improved on or is that
> > a fundamental limit?
> 
> I do dump/restores fir this sort of thing.
> 
+1

John


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] One disk speed problem [SOLVED], and a question on hdparm

2012-03-28 Thread John Austin 
On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 12:32 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:02 PM,   wrote:
> >> 
> >> Still, I'd have to agree with m.roth: parted(8) has a...um...classical
> >> UI.  It's not far advanced beyond the ex(1) school of UI design.
> >
> > I disagree. I don't think it's advanced beyond that school
> >
> 
> Yes, it is so bad that it is surprising that there is not a text-mode
> program that performs the functions of gparted - or is there one?
> That is, something that gives you a fill-in-the-form setup with
> reasonable defaults, then runs parted (and maybe mklabel, mkfs, etc.)
> for you.   Do we really need to run X for that?
> 
Hi

I have been using gdisk for at least a year on Centos and F15/F16

Current Centos 6.2 server disk was probably partitioned using F15 gdisk
followed by a custom install of C6.0

Centos 6.2 gdisk is now installed on the server (maui, 256GB SSD)

[root@maui ~]# gdisk /dev/sda
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.1

Partition table scan:
  MBR: protective
  BSD: not present
  APM: not present
  GPT: present

Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.

Command (? for help): p
Disk /dev/sda: 468862128 sectors, 223.6 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): 238914FA-2437-4AD8-B803-5CA2860D9D93
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 468862094
Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
Total free space is 2014 sectors (1007.0 KiB)

Number  Start (sector)End (sector)  Size   Code  Name
   120484095   1024.0 KiB  EF02  BIOS boot partition
   24096 2101247   1024.0 MiB  EF00  Linux/Windows data
   3 2101248 6295551   2.0 GiB 8200  Linux swap
   4 629555269210111   30.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   569210112   132124671   30.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   6   132124672   174067711   20.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   7   174067712   468862094   140.6 GiB   0700  Linux/Windows data

Command (? for help): q
[root@maui ~]# uname -a
Linux maui.jaa.org.uk 2.6.32-220.7.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:52:02 GMT 
2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux



John


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread John Austin 
On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 13:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> Am 11.12.2011 13:22, schrieb John Austin:
> > 
> > Is anyone else seeing this ?
> > 
> > John
> > 
> > [root@maui ~]# yum update   
> > 
> >
> > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit  
> > 
> >  
> > Setting up Update Process   
> > 
> >  
> > Resolving Dependencies  
> > 
> >  
> > --> Running transaction check   
> > 
> >  
> > ---> Package PackageKit.x86_64 0:0.5.8-19.el6 will be updated
> > ...
> > ---> Package xorg-x11-drv-xgi.x86_64 0:1.6.0-7.el6_1.1 will be an update
> > --> Running transaction check
> > ---> Package perl-CGI.x86_64 0:3.51-119.el6_1.1 will be installed
> > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/cr/x86_64/repodata/21176588c0c317c0b6933f0c0d113263fbb2ff3f6f7bff60cbdff730a38c1db4-filelists.sqlite.bz2:
> >  [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404"
> > Trying other mirror.
> > Error: failure:
> > repodata/21176588c0c317c0b6933f0c0d113263fbb2ff3f6f7bff60cbdff730a38c1db4-filelists.sqlite.bz2
> >  from cr: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
> >  You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
> >  You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
> 


> yum clean all && yum upgrade

This was all that was needed

Thanks

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread John Austin 

Is anyone else seeing this ?

John

[root@maui ~]# yum update   
   
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit  

 
Setting up Update Process   

 
Resolving Dependencies  

 
--> Running transaction check   

 
---> Package PackageKit.x86_64 0:0.5.8-19.el6 will be updated
...
---> Package xorg-x11-drv-xgi.x86_64 0:1.6.0-7.el6_1.1 will be an update
--> Running transaction check
---> Package perl-CGI.x86_64 0:3.51-119.el6_1.1 will be installed
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/cr/x86_64/repodata/21176588c0c317c0b6933f0c0d113263fbb2ff3f6f7bff60cbdff730a38c1db4-filelists.sqlite.bz2:
 [Errno 14] PYCURL ERROR 22 - "The requested URL returned error: 404"
Trying other mirror.
Error: failure:
repodata/21176588c0c317c0b6933f0c0d113263fbb2ff3f6f7bff60cbdff730a38c1db4-filelists.sqlite.bz2
 from cr: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem
 You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] ext4, 4k sector alignment

2011-07-25 Thread John Austin 
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:23 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
> 
> > My questions for any filesystem experts are:
> >
> > Is there a way to adjust the existing md partitions to get the right
> > alignment for 4k sectors without having to do a file-oriented copy to
> > new partitions?  A resize + a dd copy to shift the position might be
> > feasible time-wise if that would work.
> 
> no expert here, but I have the scars across my back from 
> pulling arrows out, as a pioneer
> 
> We have hit the issue on our storage backend which runs ext4, 
> and on some of our dom0 built before the 4k sector alignment 
> was generally acknowledged and known to be potentially in play
> 
> We have some non-conformant units, and after seaching, 
> concluded that a 'wipe and rebuild' was the most time 
> efficient process for us -- YMMV
> 
> > Is it worth converting to ext4?
> 
> ext4 is pleasant in some large filesystem cases, but probably 
> overkill as a blanket option.
> 
> Certainly it is 'wayy overkill for domU as a general rule, as 
> it makes for a more fragile image in the sense that generic 
> tools are less likely to work without higher version and skill 
> levels when a filesystem gets horked up and a repair 
> expedition has to be mounted ... we had an issue that a 
> 'dirty' filesystem that would not fsck kept showing up in a 
> nightly backup exception report, and ended up manually 
> repairing what should have been able to be repaired 
> automatically
> 
> > Is there a difference between doing this on 5.6 or 6.x?
> 
> in C5, it took extra effort to use the technology preview; in 
> C6 it is natively available
> 
> > If I start over from scratch with 6.x, will the partitioning tools
> > automatically align for 4k sector drives (with/without lvm?)?
> 
> no idea if gparted does this by default -- it does not in all 
> versions; certainly fdisk did not -- 4k alignment is on our 
> deployment checklist, and we are manually checking 
> partitioning to make sure, when we are rebuilding boxes
> 
I can only comment on the last section

I have built Centos 6.0 on a SSD using F15 version of gdisk
man gdisk shows for the l option
"Change  the  sector  alignment value. Disks with more logical sectors
per physical sectors (such as some Western Digital models introduced in
December of 2009) and some RAID configurations can suffer performance
problems if partitions are not aligned properly for their internal data
structures. On new disks, GPT fdisk attempts  to  align partitions on
2048-sector (1MiB) boundaries by default, which optimizes performance
for both of these disk types."

Only straight ext4 parttions (No lvm)
I have seen no problems so far ...

Number  Start (sector)End (sector)  Size   Code  Name
   120484095   1024.0 KiB  EF02  BIOS boot partition
   24096 2101247   1024.0 MiB  0700  Linux/Windows data
   3 2101248 6295551   2.0 GiB 8200  Linux swap
   4 629555269210111   30.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   569210112   132124671   30.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   6   132124672   174067711   20.0 GiB0700  Linux/Windows data
   7   174067712   468862094   140.6 GiB   0700  Linux/Windows data

John


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Any known problems with kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64 / x86_64 / 3ware?

2009-09-28 Thread John Austin 
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 09:02 -0400, mbneto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a server that is running centos 5.3 x86_64 that until last week
> was running fine.   With no error messages in console and
> in /var/log/messages the server simply stops responding. 
> 
> After a reboot everything is fine.   The only change (that I could
> find) but that was not active before the first incident/reboot was the
> update of the kernel and friends.
> 
> The server (is this can help) is a intel quad core, 8GB RAM , 3 x 1TB
> disks (raid mirror with 2 active / 1 spare via 3ware controller)
> 
> Any known problem with the kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64? (I am
> assuming that this would be the only thing that could cause the
> problem due to the lack of other messages.
> 
> Regards.
> 
> yum.log
> Sep 24 12:13:48 Updated: openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:49 Updated: mysql-5.0.77-3.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:49 Updated: nspr-4.7.5-1.el5_4.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:49 Updated: openssl-0.9.8e-12.el5.i686
> Sep 24 12:13:49 Installed: libXrender-0.9.1-3.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:49 Installed: freetype-2.2.1-21.el5_3.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:51 Installed: fontconfig-2.4.1-7.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Updated: mysql-5.0.77-3.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Installed: libjpeg-6b-37.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Installed: 2:libpng-1.2.10-7.1.el5_3.2.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Updated: openssh-4.3p2-36.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Updated: gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_3.5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Installed: keyutils-1.2-1.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Installed: cairo-1.2.4-5.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:52 Installed: libtiff-3.8.2-7.el5_3.4.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: atk-1.12.2-1.fc6.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: libXfixes-4.0.1-2.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Updated: lftp-3.7.11-4.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: trousers-0.3.1-4.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Updated: ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: libXcursor-1.1.7-1.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: libXft-2.1.10-1.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: pango-1.14.9-5.el5.centos.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:53 Installed: libXrandr-1.1.1-3.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:54 Updated: nspr-4.7.5-1.el5_4.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:54 Installed: libXinerama-1.0.1-2.1.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:54 Installed: gnutls-1.4.1-3.el5_3.5.i386
> Sep 24 12:13:54 Updated: openssh-clients-4.3p2-36.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:54 Updated: openssh-server-4.3p2-36.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:55 Updated: mysql-server-5.0.77-3.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:56 Updated: 1:nfs-utils-1.0.9-42.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:56 Updated: dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:57 Updated: openssl-devel-0.9.8e-12.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:57 Updated: mysql-devel-5.0.77-3.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:13:57 Updated: mysql-devel-5.0.77-3.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:14:04 Installed: kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:14:04 Updated: kernel-headers-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64
> Sep 24 12:14:04 Installed: 1:cups-libs-1.3.7-8.el5_3.6.i386
> Sep 24 12:14:05 Installed: gtk2-2.10.4-20.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:14:05 Installed: trousers-0.3.1-4.el5.i386
> Sep 24 12:14:05 Updated: ecryptfs-utils-75-5.el5.i386
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi

Are you using nfs4 ?

Could it be the fact that nfs4 does not work with this kernel ?

This bit me hard
Revert to the previous kernel or use nfs3

http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3840
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524520

John



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] External Backup Systems?

2009-09-28 Thread John Austin 
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 03:17 +0100, M. Hamzah Khan wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-09-27 at 21:10 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > At Sun, 27 Sep 2009 23:40:17 +0100 CentOS mailing list  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hey everyone,
> > > 
> > > My home server just had a disk failure a few weeks ago and like a lot of
> > > people I haven't ever really made backups on a regular basis. So I was
> > > looking into backup solutions which will save me from this situation
> > > again.
> > > 

Hi

Why not use external eSATA/USB disks which are only connected and
powered up when required.

Very simple, very low disk usage, unlikely to fail ?
Multiple copies if required
Not power surge vulnerable
Can be stored off site

For day to day incremental backup eSATA/USB 32GB Throttle stick
Reasonably fast - in my pocket

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Getting started with NFS

2009-07-04 Thread John Austin 
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:46 +0200, Niki Kovacs wrote:
> JohnS a écrit :
> > 
> > It is in the man page which is astonishing to me.
> > 
> 
> Neither 'man nfs' nor 'man exports' specify any version. But I tried 
> again to mount the NFS share, this time by specifying a filesystem, like 
> this:
> 
> # mount -t nfs4 raymonde:/data /home/shares
> 
> Here's what I got this time:
> 
> Warning: rpc.idmapd appears not to be running.
>   All uids will be mapped to the nobody uid.
> 
> ... and I didn't get a shell prompt back, so something didn't quite work 
> out. I conclude that there's some daemon missing on the client (like I 
> said, I always start out from a minimal configuration and then add 
> packages as needed). Any idea what package rpc.idmapd belongs to, 
> because a search with 'yum provides' and 'yum search' showed nothing.
> 
> Niki
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi

Things that control nfs on the server are

1. /etc/sysconfig/nfs   no modifications required for me
2. /etc/exports see mine below
3. firewall settingsmine is off
4. /etc/idmapd.conf if using nfs4 - an nfs4 domain is required
5. /etc/fstab   probably bind mounts needed - if using nfs4

First decision is whether to use nfs4 or not - this exports works for both on 
mine
The mount command on the client is different in the two case
nfs4
mount -t nfs4 maui:/global /global

nfs3
mount maui:/exports/global /global
---
maui.jaa.org.uk sysconfig 3# cat /etc/exports
/exports
148.197.29.0/24(rw,insecure,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,no_root_squash,fsid=0)
/exports/global 
148.197.29.0/24(rw,insecure,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,nohide,no_root_squash)
/exports/home   
148.197.29.0/24(rw,insecure,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,nohide,no_root_squash)
---
bind mounts for nfs4
maui.jaa.org.uk sysconfig 4# cat /etc/fstab
LABEL=home_maui /home   ext3
defaults1 2
LABEL=global_maui   /global ext3
defaults1 2
/home   /exports/home   none bind   
 0 0
/global /exports/global none bind   
 0 0
---
maui.jaa.org.uk sysconfig 5# cat /etc/idmapd.conf
[General]
Verbosity = 0
Pipefs-Directory = /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs
#Domain = localdomain
Domain = jaa.org.uk
[Mapping]
Nobody-User = nfsnobody
Nobody-Group = nfsnobody
[Translation]
Method = nsswitch
---
maui.jaa.org.uk sysconfig 6# ps -ef|grep -i rpc
root  2380 1  0 Jul02 ?00:00:00 rpc.idmapd
---
[r...@maui ~]# service rpcidmapd status
rpc.idmapd (pid 2380) is running...
---

On the client (F11 in my case)
The default /etc/idmapd.conf should work if the nfs4 domain is the same
as the DNS domain - if in doubt force them to be the same on both the server 
and the client
The nfsnobody ownership is probably the result of the server and client domain 
not being the same
(and/or idmapd not running on both server and client)
/etc/idmapd.conf
naxos ~ 1# cat /etc/idmapd.conf 
[General]   
#Verbosity = 0  
# The following should be set to the local NFSv4 domain name
# The default is the host's DNS domain name.
#Domain = local.domain.edu  
Domain = jaa.org.uk 
...

Hope this helps

John


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Local root vulnerability in udev

2009-04-20 Thread John Austin 
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 09:21 -0400, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Lanny Marcus  
> > wrote:
> >   
> >> I just saw this thread in the OLM forum. Possibly of interest, since
> >> they say it includes CentOS 5, if the update hasn't been released yet.
> >> Always good  to keep boxes updated, for security and stability
> >> reasons.
> >>
> >> 
> >>
> >> 
> > I posted the above Saturday night and there was very little activity
> > in this mailing list over the weekend. Anyone using Apache on CentOS
> > 5, heads up!
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >   
> Lanny,
> I just killed the udevd on my two servers and await the update
> What are you looking for?
> Rob
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

New udev just arrived - I assume this the fix !!
udev-095-14.20.el5_3.x86_64.rpm

John

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos