Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:11:55 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: Mike - email ignored wrote: How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of my accounts has it right, but not the other. I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was missing from the bad account so I copied it from the good account, but it made no difference. depends on what shell you're using bash uses $HOME/.bash_profile Its bash. Following from .bash_profile to .bashrc to /etc/bashrc, and noting that at level 3, $TERM=linux, I should be calling /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-default, if I have one, which I don't. But root gets it right, and myUser gets it wrong. cd; grep -i .* shows only the .tcshrc which I should have realized is not the one. So how is root getting it right? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote: [...] Ah! Permission/ownership problem? mark Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong permissions and .bash_profile was missing! I am sure that this happened because I copied /home/myUser was copied in from backup before the account was created. We won't do that again. But now, I still do not see how the prompt is set since I have no /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-default . Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:22:44 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote:
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:48 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw
wrote: [...]
Ah! Permission/ownership problem?
Good suggestion. I found that for myUser .bashrc had the wrong
permissions and .bash_profile was missing! I am sure that this
happened because I copied /home/myUser was copied in from backup before
the account was created. We won't do that again.
But now, I still do not see how the prompt is set since I have no
/etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-default .
From the code /etc/bashrc:
...
screen)
if [ -e /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-screen ]; then
PROMPT_COMMAND=/etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-screen
else
PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne
\033_${us...@${hostname%%.*}:${PWD/#$HOME/~}; echo -ne \033\\'
fi
;;
...
mark
Not so. With this debug:
---
echo TERM = $TERM
# are we an interactive shell?
if [ $PS1 ]; then
case $TERM in
xterm*)
if [ -e /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-xterm ]; then
PROMPT_COMMAND=/etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-xterm
else
PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne \033]0;${us...@${hostname%%.*}:${PWD/#
$HOME/~}; echo -ne \007'
fi
;;
screen)
echo doing screen
if [ -e /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-screen ]; then
PROMPT_COMMAND=/etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-screen
else
PROMPT_COMMAND='echo -ne \033_${us...@${hostname%%.*}:${PWD/#$HOME/
~}; echo -ne \033\\'
fi
;;
*)
echo doing default
[ -e /etc/sysconfig/bash-prompt-default ] PROMPT_COMMAND=/etc/
sysconfig/bash-prompt-default
;;
esac
---
I get:
TERM = linux
doing default
The mystery remains.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:48:58 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Mike - email ignored wrote: [...] I get: TERM = linux doing default The mystery remains. what do you get with these: echo $PROMPT_COMMAND echo $PS1 if $PROMPT_COMMAND has a value you could grep for it (or for PROMPT_COMMAND) in /etc and subdirs, and try to find it? [myu...@mbrc40 ~]$ echo $PROMPT_COMMAND [myu...@mbrc40 ~]$ echo $PS1 [...@\h \W]\$ ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:50:54 -0700, m.roth-x6lchVBUigD1P9xLtpHBDw wrote: [...] No, we're getting closer. What you need to find out is what's setting TERM to linux, which is further back than /etc/bashrc. Is the user logging directly onto the Linux box, or are they from, say, a WinDoze box via putty, or ...? mark Direct. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] format level 3 prompt
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 18:00:25 +0100, Frank.Brodbeck-E4aVwrWTXLGELgA04lAiVw
wrote:
Hi,
I'd try this as a quickshot:
find /etc /root /home -type f -exec grep -l PS3 {} \;
than I'd take a closer look at the files that will show up. And I'd read
bash(1) closely to learn which files are being read in which order and
especially when.
If all of the above doesn't lead me anywhere, I'd start poking around on
a mailing list to see if somebody could explain me what's going on, but
maybe that's just me.
Frank.
[r...@mbrc40 ~]# find /etc /root /home -type f -exec grep -l PS3 {} \;
/etc/termcap
/etc/pki/tls/certs/ca-bundle.crt
/etc/alsa/cards/PS3.conf
/root/.ssh/exe/psftp.exe
/root/.ssh/exe/putty.exe
/root/.mozilla/firefox/l2cth6mq.default/Cache/61FD9500d01
/root/nvidia/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-190.42-pkg1.run
[... I removed results in .pan2]
In termcap, it is in a comment.
in ca-bundle.crt, its in the base64 (don't tell anyone)
Nothing else seems relevant.
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] openvpn server: one client works; one fails.
I installed an openvpn-2.0.9 server on my new CentOS 5.4 box from using the same parameters I used on a Fedora box I retired. Now I have a dual boot laptop that has WinXP and Fedora FC8. Both of these partitions have openvpn clients installed that have worked well in the past. After adjusting these for new IP addresses, I find: WinXP: connects and contacts boxes on the same LAN as the server. FC8 appears to connect but will not contact anything. Since I have nested routers, I was able to disconnect from the real WAN, and use an emulated WAN. I then shut off iptables on both Linux boxes. The behavior was not altered. BTW, I use TAP rather than TUN. I have run out of ideas. Suggestions would be most welcome. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] openvpn server: one client works; one fails.
On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:14:14 +, Mike - email ignored wrote: [...] PROBLEM SOLVED by shutting off eth0 on the laptop. This was never necessary before. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] format level 3 prompt
How do I format the prompt at level 3? One of my accounts has it right, but not the other. I guessed that it was in .tcshrc which was missing from the bad account so I copied it from the good account, but it made no difference. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] openvpn for CentOS 5.4
Where can I get openvpn for Centos 5.4? yum list openvpn doesn't find it. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] pan news reader
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:41:47 -0500, Ron Loftin wrote: On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 03:38 +, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Does anyone know if the pan news reader works on CentOS 5.4? I am considering installing version 0.132 that I downloaded from pan.rebelbase.com . I'm using 0.133 from rpmforge. Seems to work fine. Thanks for your advice. Mike. I was not successful in installing the tarball from pan.rebelbase.com so I tried the rpm you suggested. It went in with no problem. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] pan news reader
On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 05:00:28 -0500, B.J. McClure wrote: This works fine for me on 5.4. [bmccl...@house ~]$ rpm -q pan pan-0.132-1.el5.rf CentOS 5.4, Linux 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 athlon 04:58:11 up 8:30, 2 users, load average: 0.06, 0.13, 0.09 It didn't work for me until I installed it from an rpm. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Stop K3B CDDB Popup
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to Select a CDDB entry How can I stop this popup? Tried the 'configure k3b' menu? There's a CDDB section... JD Yes, I unchecked the things in the CDDB section. The popup still appears. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Stop K3B CDDB Popup
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to Select a CDDB entry How can I stop this popup? Tried the 'configure k3b' menu? There's a CDDB section... Yes, I unchecked the things in the CDDB section. The popup still appears. I have local CDDB, maybe that's why I don't get popups? $ cat ~/.kde/share/config/k3brc [Cddb] cddb server=Http freedb.org:80 cgi path=/~cddb/cddb.cgi local cddb dirs=~/.cddb/ save cddb entries locally=true use local cddb query=true use manual cgi path=false use remote cddb=false But I never inserted an audio CD, so cannot be sure... JD Didn't work. Then I ran yum remove k3b and I still had the problem. The popup top says KsCD and I found an item on the menu by that name. I checked Cache Only in its configuration FWIW. Also in Control Center - Peripherals - Storage Media, I clicked Do Nothing. For now, the popups stopped. Is there a way to remove KsCD? There is no audio on the system. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Stop K3B CDDB Popup
On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:29:10 -0600, Robert wrote: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 06:22:02 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com On Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:27:18 -0800, John Doe wrote: From: MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to Select a CDDB entry How can I stop this popup? Tried the 'configure k3b' menu? There's a CDDB section... Yes, I unchecked the things in the CDDB section. The popup still appears. I have local CDDB, maybe that's why I don't get popups? $ cat ~/.kde/share/config/k3brc [Cddb] cddb server=Http freedb.org:80 cgi path=/~cddb/cddb.cgi local cddb dirs=~/.cddb/ save cddb entries locally=true use local cddb query=true use manual cgi path=false use remote cddb=false But I never inserted an audio CD, so cannot be sure... JD Didn't work. Then I ran yum remove k3b and I still had the problem. The popup top says KsCD and I found an item on the menu by that name. I checked Cache Only in its configuration FWIW. Also in Control Center - Peripherals - Storage Media, I clicked Do Nothing. For now, the popups stopped. Is there a way to remove KsCD? There is no audio on the system. Mike. Kscd is part of the kdemultimedia package: [r...@mavis rj]# rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/bin/kscd kdemultimedia-3.5.4-2.fc6 You might want to worry about what else is in that package before tossing it: [r...@mavis rj]# rpm -ql kdemultimedia | wc -l 1077 [r...@mavis rj]# You might find a config option in /usr/share/config.kcfg/kscd.kcfg but that's an XML file. Another thought is to rename the executable and see what havoc that causes or look at the spec file in the src.rpm with the idea of getting rid of the junk the right way. Good luck! Thanks, I just ran yum remove kdemultimedia. Since the box is used primarily for C++ code development, and occasionally as a web server, I have a strong feeling that I won't miss it. If I do, I could reinstall it. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] pan news reader
Does anyone know if the pan news reader works on CentOS 5.4? I am considering installing version 0.132 that I downloaded from pan.rebelbase.com . Thanks for your advice. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Stop K3B CDDB Popup
On CentOS 5.4 I just installed K3B to write some CDs. Now every time I used a CD, I get a popup that asks me to Select a CDDB entry How can I stop this popup? Thanks, Mike, ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Centos HP Pavilion box
Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box? I'm having some problems. For example, I can't get my Dell E198WFPV 1440x900 monitor to work correctly. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Centos HP Pavilion box
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 11:33:08 -0500, mark wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Has anyone put Centos 5.4 (or ant version on aHP Pavilion box? I'm having some problems. For example, I can't get my Dell E198WFPV 1440x900 monitor to work correctly. What's the video card? mark Video card: NVIDA C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i] When I go to: Administration - Display - Settings and select 1440x900, it changes it to 1280x1024. It does this for various settings of Hardware - Monitor Type. The monitor is a Dell E198WFPV. I note that the list CentOS offers includes all of this except the terminal 'V', with analog and digital options. I tried both, as well as generic choices. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Problem: NVIDIA C73 1440x900
As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my Video card: NVIDIA C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i] to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4 on my HP Pavilion with monitor Dell E198WFPV. Googing around, I see that others have had this problem with the NVIDIA card. In one case, it was solved by gaining access to card parameters and setting them directly. I can't find a way to do this on my box. One solution might be to just insert another video card in the bus, and ignore the NVIDIA. Would this work? I have a card that I know works. Thanks in advance for your advice. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Problem: NVIDIA C73 1440x900
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:42:11 -0500, fred smith wrote: On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:31:20PM +, MIKE - EMAIL IGNORED wrote: As mentioned in my previous thread, I can't get my Video card: NVIDIA C73 [GeForce: 7100/ nForce 630i] to display 1440x900 on my CentOS 5.4 on my HP Pavilion with monitor Dell E198WFPV. Googing around, I see that others have had this problem with the NVIDIA card. In one case, it was solved by gaining access to card parameters and setting them directly. I can't find a way to do this on my box. One solution might be to just insert another video card in the bus, and ignore the NVIDIA. Would this work? I have a card that I know works. Thanks in advance for your advice. Mike: I have no experience with that card, but here are a couple of ideas that may help: --are you using a digital (DVI) video cable, or the analog cable from video card to monitor? If DVI, try the analog (VGA) cable and see if it allows you to select the resolution you need. (my new DVI monitor came with a note that said that some cards cannot select the right resolution when using the DVI cable, but will work fine with a VGA cable--though it worked fine for me with my nvidia card (9800GT)) --have you tried using xrandr to force it to the desired resolution? 'man xrandr' is your friend. Fred The screen is connected through an Iogear switch so the screen works with two Linux boxes. I assume that this is a digital connection, although I don't really know. Everything is fine with the other box as well as the old box I am replacing. I tried: xrandx --verbose -s 1440x900 I get: Size 1440x900 is not found in available modes I am considering taking the video card from the old box and putting it in the new one, and ignoring the original card in the new box. Might this work? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Long tar -x: Box Shuts Down
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past. Any suggestions? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long tar -x: Box Shuts Down
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote: On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past. Any suggestions? Look in the logs, particularly dmesg, to see if there are any hints there. Bill Nothing jumps out. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long tar -x: Box Shuts Down
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:03:49 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past. Any suggestions? Are you dropping things on top of running programs (like tar itself) or /proc or /sys? I hope not; I am putting the result in a data directory. In and case, I can't run at all now. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Long tar -x: Box Shuts Down
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:51:35 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:04:50 -0800, Bill Campbell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
My Centos 5.2 box shuts itself down during a long tar -x. There is
plenty of disk available. This is new; it worked in the past.
Any suggestions?
Look in the logs, particularly dmesg, to see if there are any hints
there.
Bill
Nothing jumps out.
Mike.
I got it working again with a rescue, but it still crashes.
Here are some suspect lines from messages:
Nov 5 19:35:14 mbrc21 kernel: hda: drive_cmd: status=0x51 { DriveReady
SeekComplete Error }
Nov 5 19:35:14 mbrc21 kernel: hda: drive_cmd: error=0x04
{ DriveStatusError }
Nov 5 19:35:14 mbrc21 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xb0
...
Nov 5 19:35:34 mbrc21 kernel: ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] - GSI
16 (level, low) - IRQ 201
What do you think?
Thanks,
Mike.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] differences in DNS between boxes
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC): Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd Why don't you keep posting in there then? Because the new title reflects a new focus, and I hoped to attract different people. Suggestions would be most welcome. Foremost, you want to find out why those queries are generated despite the fact that hostnamelookups are off. That is surely something in your configuration or a web application. It's not a general problem of Apache on CentOS, mine are all not doing that. Kai Until now, for a long time, mine wasn't doing it either. Part of the problem was suggested by someone on the Apache group; there are two problems: 1. Both boxes have nscd, but it was not running on the CentOS box. Now that I fixed that, all but the first connection are rapid, as you might expect. 2. We still do not why the change in httpd.conf caused the problem to appear. However, my belief that there was a difference between the two machines is accounted for by the difference in /etc/init.d/nscd . When I tried it for the first time this morning, the box that previously been fast was slow. No doubt, the nscd storage had timed out. Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] differences in DNS between boxes
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:23:04 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: [...] Until now, for a long time, mine wasn't doing it either. Part of the problem was suggested by someone on the Apache group; there are two problems: 1. Both boxes have nscd, but it was not running on the CentOS box. Now that I fixed that, all but the first connection are rapid, as you might expect. 2. We still do not why the change in httpd.conf caused the problem to appear. However, my belief that there was a difference between the two machines is accounted for by the difference in /etc/init.d/nscd . When I tried it for the first time this morning, the box that previously been fast was slow. No doubt, the nscd storage had timed out. Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup? If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees somewhere on a common host and let diff -r walk through them. As indicated above, I already know the difference between the two boxes. Are you sure this isn't as simple as having (and using, check your resolv.conf) a caching name server running on one box so most lookups are resolved locally while the other is making the query to something slow? resolve.config is the same on the two boxes. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] differences in DNS between boxes
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:55:01 -0400, Matty wrote: [...] If you are uncertain where the DNS lookups are originating from, you could always add an interposer between Apache and glibc. When the culprit calls one of the get* routines, you could log a backtrace to a file. Summarizing the backtraces should lead you to the modules (and directives) responsible for the lookups. If you happen to have a Solaris 10 / OpenSolaris host handy, you can use the DTrace ustack() action to do just this. No need to muck around with interposing on the glibc calls. Hope this helps, - Ryan I don't have Solaris; where would I get the interposer, and how would I add it? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] differences in DNS between boxes
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:58:17 -0700, nate wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup? Something I like to do when troubleshooting apache related things is turn on mod_status and mod_info and compare the results there(mod_info really mod_status for realtime stuff), just in the off chance a config is loading that you don't expect, or perhaps apache wasn't properly restarted/reloaded since the last change etc. nate I have good reason to believe that the loaded config is largely correct; do think that this can tell me why there are DNS calls? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] differences in DNS between boxes
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:28:13 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees somewhere on a common host and let diff -r walk through them. As indicated above, I already know the difference between the two boxes. I find that a little hard to believe, since they behave differently and you seem not to understand why. I have corrected the difference, and they now behave the same. Are you sure this isn't as simple as having (and using, check your resolv.conf) a caching name server running on one box so most lookups are resolved locally while the other is making the query to something slow? resolve.config is the same on the two boxes. Assuming you mean resolv.conf, is the the first choice one of the boxes in question? Yes, resolv.conf , I am not sure that I understand the question. The resolv.conf for the two boxes are identical. Each contain two router addresses. I have two nested routers, and each have the same two real DNS addresses. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] excessive DNS slows httpd
My web server is a CentOS box thus: [root ~]# uname -a Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux root ~]# rpm -q httpd httpd-2.2.3-22.el5.centos.2 My development and standby is on a Fedora box thus: [root ~]# uname -a Linux mbrc32 2.6.23.17-88.fc7 #1 SMP Thu May 15 00:35:10 EDT 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [root@ ~]# rpm -q httpd httpd-2.2.8-1.fc7 They are close neighbors on my LAN. Now I recently revised my httpd.conf making it somewhat more complex and adding ssl for part of it. Running the same configuration on both boxes, I find that the Fedora box runs rapidly, while the CentOS box is very slow. Examining the situation with WireShark on both boxes I find that in responding to a simple GET, the CentOS box does a sequence of DNS queries to resolve the details of the location of the client IP address, whereas the Fedora box does no such thing. It ts these DNS queries that are causing the slow response. Now if I revert to the old configuration, there is no such problem and WireShark shows that there are no DNS queries. Advice on how to proceed would be much appreciated. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] excessive DNS slows httpd
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:11:09 -0400, Brian Mathis wrote: What did you revise in your httpd.conf file? My guess is that you enabled DNS lookups for the connecting clients. HostnameLookups Off The changes were largely the removal of a lot of common code for Directorys and VirtualHosts to other files and the addition of Includes. I then tightened up some RewriteRules and RewriteConds, and added some IfDefine so I don't have to edit the file as often. And I added SSL for one virtual host, and bought a certificate. Remember -- the httpd configuration and the web data itself are exactly the same on both boxes, except for the IP addresses. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] excessive DNS slows httpd
On Mon, 03 Aug 2009 20:23:18 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: [...] Are you doing any proxy passthrough's or rewrites resulting in a proxy? Or client access permissions based on hostnames. These things might be specified in a .htaccess file. Also, remember that all the /etc/httpd/conf.d/*.conf files are included. I did cd /etc/httpd/conf.d/; grep -i HostnameLookups *; . Anything else I should look for? There are no .htaccess files. I do use reverse proxy to access large files which at present are on the same box. However, the failure occurs on the home page which is a simple menu that doesn't call the reverse proxy. It does go through a rather complex CGI written in C++. However, for the home page, nothing complex happens; it is just passed through. Thanks for your ideas. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] aautomatic updates
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:14:25 -0500, Robert wrote: [...] Don't you just hate it when you know something and can't remember it!?! Yes, and it happens more often as time passes. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] aautomatic updates
Could someone please remind me what file controls automatic updates? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd: internal dummy connection
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:31:23 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC): If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy site. I wonder why it thinks so. And I wonder why you use ZA at all. Kai It blocks all sorts of things. Along with useful software I get, I get all sorts of junk that pops up things. A few clicks in ZA, and its gone, but not in a final way in case I made a mistake. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd: internal dummy connection
On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:41:26 +0100, Rainer Duffner wrote: Kai Schaetzl schrieb: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:07:59 + (UTC): If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy site. I wonder why it thinks so. And I wonder why you use ZA at all. Or Windows, for that matter. ;-) Rainer I still see it as a necessary evil. Last time I looked at Open Office, I found that cross-references in the word processor essentially did not exist. For most uses, that is a deal breaker. :( However, most of the time I spend on computers is on various Linux boxes. :) Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] httpd: internal dummy connection
On my Centos 2.5 web server, in /var/log/httpd/access_log, I saw several occurrences of: new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.0 403 - - Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) (internal dummy connection) I have never seen anything like this before over many years of watching my logs. I presume it failed because my named virtual host does not have new..., if for no other reason. What is it? Why do I have it now, and not before? Thanks for your advice. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] httpd: internal dummy connection
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:45:36 -0800, Florin Andrei wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: new.mydomain.net - - [11/Feb/2009:14:34:58 -0500] GET / HTTP/1.0 403 - - Apache/2.2.3 (CentOS) (internal dummy connection) What is it? Why do I have it now, and not before? http://tinyurl.com/cnzaf6 If I click this on a FC7) Linux box, Firefox gets redirected to google, and automatically runs a search. I wonder how that happens. If I try to access it on a WinXP box, ZoneAlarm blocks it as a spy site. I wonder why it thinks so. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Old Small Box
I have an old 400mHz Dell with a 20G hard drive and 125M ram. Can I install and run CentOS on it? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:31:20 +0100, Kai Schaetzl wrote: [...] I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 that means exactly what? Kai I have a DVD image of CentOS 5.2 downloaded a few months ago. It is installed on an ftp server on a nearby machine. I booted the netinstall disk and did a complete install, removing all partitions, and reformatting the hard drive. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:18:37 +, Tony Mountifield wrote: [...] This suggests that yum is not flushing output, possibly because it doesn't think it's stdio is on a tty. 1. Were you running yum update locally on the console, or remotely via a network connection of some kind, e.g. ssh? If you do it as a direct command to ssh (ssh myhost yum update) you might get those symptoms, unless you also give -t to ssh: ssh -t myhost yum update 2. If you were on the console, were you piping the output of yum through something else like tee? e.g. yum update | tee mylogfile If so, you might again get the same symptoms. If you want to capture the output of the session, use the script command: # script mylogfile Script started, file is mylogfile # yum update # exit Script done, file is mylogfile # If neither of the above is applicable, please explain exactly what you did, step by step, including what you might consider insignificant. Cheers Tony On the local console, I did: yum update 21 | tee log so, as you say, that might account for the problem. But it is not clear to me why this would be so. I'll try the script suggestion. FWIW, the missing output did not appear in the log file. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update
I am redoing it with script, and it is working well. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] yum update fails: CentOS 5.2
It gets as far as telling me: Total download size: 207 M It doesn't ask if its ok. But if I type yenter it reports: Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages: Then it does nothing. I can't kill it with CRTL-C, but I killed the yum process with kill -9 from another window. I retried it several times; same result. Thanks for your help. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Bugs in yum update
This is a continuation of the thread: yum update fails: CentOS 5.2. I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. It ran correctly, except for these issues: 1. As previously mentioned, after deciding what it is going to do, It doesn't ask if its ok. But if I type yenter it reports: Is this ok [y/N]: Downloading Packages: 2. During the long period it is downloading files, it doesn't print anything, giving the impression that nothing is happening. Watching the lights, and using WireShark and ARIN, I determined that it was downloading from the Rochester Institute of Technology. I decided that was good. During the install phase, the expected logging appeared. 3. When it said it was finished, it didn't exit the yum process; I did it with CRTL-C . Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Bugs in yum update
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:25:06 -0500, Jim Perrin wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED m_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote: This is a continuation of the thread: yum update fails: CentOS 5.2. I installed a fresh Centos 5.2 and ran yum update. It ran correctly, except for these issues: Okay, a few things to get out of the way first What's the output of the following commands? uname -a rpm -Va python\* yum\* sqlite\* rpm -qa python\* How much ram do you have in the box? Have you installed any packages from 3rd party repositories? [r...@mbrc21 ~]# uname -a Linux mbrc21 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 12:03:43 EST 2008 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux [r...@mbrc21 ~]# rpm -Va python\* yum\* sqlite\* [r...@mbrc21 ~]# rpm -qa python\* python-ldap-2.2.0-2.1 python-devel-2.4.3-21.el5 python-numeric-23.7-2.2.2 python-2.4.3-21.el5 python-iniparse-0.2.3-4.el5 python-elementtree-1.2.6-5 python-sqlite-1.1.7-1.2.1 python-urlgrabber-3.1.0-2 [r...@mbrc21 ~]# As you can see, the second command got no response. From top: Mem: 1035288k total Packages from 3rd party repositories: not yet, but will soon install some. Thanks for your help. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Capture NX 1 vs 2
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 16:18:37 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: I have Capture NX 1. Is it worth spending money to get Capture NX 2? Why? Thanks, Mike. Sorry, wrong group. Please ignore. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] secure file not updating
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008 02:25:17 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on Dec 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently appear in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages file. Mike. Here are some tentative observations: If I do a vi on the secure file and write it from vi, it stops recording. If I do a /var/init.d/syslog restart, the secure file starts recording. I still have no idea how swatch continues to function after the syslog stops recording. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] secure file not updating
On Sat, 13 Dec 2008 11:33:06 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: On my Centos 5 server, the secure file has not updated since Dec 10. This despite the fact that I run an sshd server that I access many times per day. Most peculiar is the fact that a swatch monitor that I run on the secure file catches plenty of lines. It is as if when swatch catches a line in the file, the line is removed from the file and the modification date is set back. Hard to believe. Any ideas? What is the output of lsattr /var/log/secure? Do you have SELinux enabled, and are there any corresponding lines in /var/log/audit/audit.log? # lsattr /var/log/secure - /var/log/secure selinux is disabled /var/log/audit/audit.log appears to have lines describing a login I did a few minutes ago, and its modification date is correct. # ls -l /var/log/secure -rw--- 1 root root 18950 Dec 10 12:38 /var/log/secure # date Sat Dec 13 09:42:36 EST 2008 Any unexpected syslog configuration? Does a touch update the timestamp? in syslog.conf: # added by MDB local0.*/var/log/httpd/cgi_log local1.*/var/log/net_que local2.*/var/log/sock_mon kern.=debug /var/log/ipt_log I also have added a number of things to logrotate. These things have been working well for years, although only a few months on Centos. touch /var/log/secure updated the timestamp as expected. I note that early tomorrow morning the logrotate occurs. I wonder what will happen. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] secure file not updating
Further examination shows numerous log lines that were detected on Dec 12 by swatch using tail on the secure file but do not presently appear in the secure file. However, they do appear in the messages file. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Unexpected FTP Activity
Since I put my new Centos box on the net, it frequently tr1es to make ftp contact with IP address 64.90.181.77 . Why is this, and does anyone recognize this IP address? Is it spyware? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Unexpected FTP Activity
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] Or it's yum-updatesd in action. Ralph [...] It looks like this is it; I shut it down. I don't remember being offered a choice about this on install; maybe I didn't recognize it. I would think it should be made obvious. Is there any other automatic Internet activity in Centos? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Unexpected FTP Activity
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote: Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:03:41 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] Or it's yum-updatesd in action. Ralph [...] It looks like this is it; I shut it down. Is there a reason why you don't want your machine updated? Yes indeed! I do some complicated things, and I can do without the wonderful surprises that updates sometimes deliver. I do updates, but at times of my choice, and I watch what I get. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 18:01:24 +0930, admin wrote: Have you run several Virtual Hosts with the same IP address? Yes, I run multiple Virtual Hosts on my development server and they all look like this: NameVirtualHost *:80 VirtualHost *:80 DocumentRoot /var/www/html/site1 ServerName site1.localhost other stuff /VirtualHost VirtualHost *:80 DocumentRoot /var/www/html/site2 ServerName site2.localhost other stuff /VirtualHost VirtualHost *:80 DocumentRoot /var/www/html/site3 ServerName site3.localhost other stuff /VirtualHost Have you got your ServerNames set up properly in /etc/hosts or DNS? All in hosts; my stuff is working now. My last query was really addressed to Michael Peterson, who indicated that he omits ServerName. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Unexpected FTP Activity
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:52:33 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes indeed! I do some complicated things, and I can do without the wonderful surprises that updates sometimes deliver. I do updates, but at times of my choice, and I watch what I get. Good luck with the wonderful surprises you will have to deal with if your machine gets compromised while running unpatched vulnerable software. Filipe No doubt, what you say is a concern. But I have a very tight firewall, and I take few risks. On Linux systems, in my experience, surprise results from updates have been more of a problem. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Unexpected FTP Activity
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:59:35 -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 11:27:45 -0400, Toby Bluhm wrote: Is there a reason why you don't want your machine updated? On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 12:07, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: Yes indeed! [...] On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 14:42, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: He didn't say he wasn't going to update, Yes, he did! :-) he just said he wants to do it on his schedule. Nothing wrong with that. As a matter of fact, it is more proper to update when you have tested on an enterprise system. Agreed, in particular with updates that bump a release (5.1 - 5.2), I also do it manually and not automatically. However, nowadays I consider updating the system and applying security patches an essential part of the sysadmin role in a Linux environment. Filipe I quote from a previous post by me on this thread: I do updates, but at times of my choice, and I watch what I get. The reason I am moving from Fedora to Centos is that on a Fedora news group I mentioned that I am interested in reliability and stability. A respondent suggested that in that case, I would be better off with Centos, since Fedora experiments with the latest and greatest, and therefore takes chances that would not be appropriate in an enterprise context. Automatic updates are inconsistent with my objective. I like to comment on my past employment years ago with a large company whose name you would recognize. I maintained control systems whose failure would cost dollars quickly counted in the millions, and could potentially endanger human life. The operating systems on these machines were well understood and long obsolete. A suggestion that they be upgraded would be met with a blank stare. I believe that the implementation of automatic updates would have resulted in dismissal. ): Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On: Centos 5.2, with httpd-2.2.3-11.el5_1.centos.3 I tried to bring up a web server using an httpd.con that runs well on: Fedora 8, with httpd-2.2.8-1.fc8 as well as several earlier versions, going back to Fedora 4. On the Centos version, I cannot successfully: run a NameVirtualHost; execute a CGI. I can bring up a simple page if I avoid the above. Suggestions would be much appresiated. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:51:54 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote: [...] Don't we all like puzzles? All those hundreds of pieces which look similar? Is that blue one there sky or is it the water? The green one over there - is it a tree? Is it a part of that house which has been painted green? If you want to solve that puzzle, it often helps to look at the picture on the top of the box. IOW: What did you try to do? What happened? What did you expect to happen? What does your config look like? Are there any errors in the log file? Ralph [...] Indeed. Here is a summary: ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /var/www/cgi-bin/ ... NameVirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80 ... VirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 Location / Order allow,deny # Allow from All Deny from all /Location /VirtualHost VirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 127.0.0.1:80 ServerName new.rosemike.net Options -All SymLinksIfOwnerMatch ExecCGI DocumentRoot /var/www/html/www DirectoryIndex index.cgi RewriteEngine on RewriteOptions Inherit ... RewriteRule ^/$ - [L] ... /VirtualHost All access attempts are with http://new.rosemike.net/ with that name appropriately defined in hosts files, as verified by ping. Now run as shown, the client gets: You don't have permission to access / on this server. If you comment out the first VirtualHost block: you get the same thing If you then add to the second virtual host block: Location / Allow from All /Location you get: You don't have permission to access /index.cgi on this server. (note that there are links to index.cgi in all directories.) if you comment out Servername nothing changes If you now expose the first VirtualHost block and change to Allow from All Deny from None you get the page displayed, but not via the CGI, as verified by absence debug text the CGI would have added, as well as nothing in a log the CGI writes. Well, you asked. BTW, I emphasize that this configuration works well on Fedora, which you can see at www.rosemike.net . Thanks for your interest. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 10:14:54 -0700, Jerry Franz wrote: [...] What do you get in the error_log? I found the CGI problem (mia culpa), and the CGI is now working, but the NameVirtualHost still has a problem. NameVirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 NameVirtualHost 127.0.0.1:80 ... VirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 Location / Order allow,deny Allow from None Deny from All /Location /VirtualHost VirtualHost 192.168.9.21:80 127.0.0.1:80 ServerName new.rosemike.net Options -All SymLinksIfOwnerMatch ExecCGI DocumentRoot /var/www/html/www DirectoryIndex index.cgi RewriteEngine on ... With the above I get: [client 192.168.9.10] client denied by server configuration: /var/www/html/www/ [client 192.168.9.10] client denied by server configuration: /var/www/error/noindex.html If I comment out the first VirtualHost block I get correct function. Most notably, correct function persists if I comment out the ServerName line. It appears the ServerName line is ignored in all cases. I also tried changing the order of the VirtualHost blocks. No change. Thanks again for your interest. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 18:07:08 +, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote: [...] I have additional information that ServerName is not working. My system requires two virtual hosts with different values of ServerName. If they share an IP address, the system fails. But if each virtual host has a unique IP address, the system works. In other words, ServerName alone fails to distinguish two named virtual hosts. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:31:19 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: what's the purpose of that whole confusing configuration? If you want to use IP-based virtualhosts *any* of them needs a servername. And why do you enclose the Location statement in a virtualhost? Why don't you simply specify the real location? And I would use Location / to make it look less like XML. Options -All SymLinksIfOwnerMatch ExecCGI you don't need to remove All From my perspective you aim at a really hard to read and understand configuration. I wouldn't ever dare to mix the IP-based hosts like you try to do. Simplify your config and it will work. Kai If I understand you correctly, you indicate that I should remove the VirtualHost that does not contain a ServerName, advice in the delivered httpd.config file notwithstanding. In fact, that is how I now have it, thereby eliminating the protection against IP address access, which I would rather have. In any case, as I indicate in another post, it still fails to properly distinguish on the basis of ServerName. Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 22:42:06 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: [...] I still don't see the purpose of that virtual host. If it is for catching IP only accesses there are several methods to do this. Look for default virtualhost in the apache documentation (and in the config template coming with CentOS). Also, if that single virtualhost documentroot and the main documentroot (in httpd.conf) are not the same then all non-hostname access will got to the main server documentroot and not your virtual host. Kai Following your suggestions, everything now working correctly. Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: NameVirtualHost and CGI Problems
On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:03:13 -0500, Michael Peterson wrote: Michael Peterson wrote on Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:09:54 -0500: You need to remove the :80 in the VirtualHost declarations that contains Servername entries. No, that's perfectly ok and recommended. His problem was that he was using a virtual host without a ServerName directive. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I run a Virtual Host entry without a ServerName directive and have been through several releases of CentOS and Apache and all works fine for me. Have you run several Virtual Hosts with the same IP address? Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] support libipq?
I am thinking of trying centos (I am now using Fedora). Does centos support libipq? Thanks, Mike. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
