Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird question
On 06/14/2015 04:53 PM, jd1008 wrote: I was looking at the output of thunderbird --help and I see there is no cli arg that makes it start with a specific profile (which can be any one of n profiles) - unless I am not reading the output properly :) I am trying to avoid having to select the profile when starting thunderbird on different worspaces for different profiles. thunderbird -P profile_name https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Command_Line_Options#User_Profile -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mod_suPHP
On 05/24/2015 12:20 PM, Bob Puff wrote: I have been trying to get mod_suPHP working on Centos 7's httpd, just as I've done with versions 5 and 6. I found a couple RPMs that others have built, and I even compiled suPHP from source, and got a successful compile. Each time, I can see with phpinfo() that the mod_suPHP module did indeed load, yet I cannot seem to get any script to run in a user other than the default of 'nobody'. Has anyone else had success with this? For a virtual hosting environment, I really need this type of functionality. 7 is definitely a different animal, but there must be something I am missing. I do have selinux disabled. Bob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos I gave up and went with mod_ruid2, which is pretty much a drop-in replacement for suPHP -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] C7 http ITK
I've been trying to get the mod_itk module installed on Centos 7. The package is in epel, but there's an error once it's installed mod_access_compat.so undefined symbol ap_hook_check_access. Can anyone point me to a set of RPMs that will let me run itk or another C7 ready tool that will easily run each vhost as a different user? -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Building mod_suphp on Centos 7
I've downloaded the tarball. When I run ./configure, I get [sdstern@cumberland suphp-0.7.2]$ ./configure configure: error: cannot find install-sh, install.sh, or shtool in config ./config I've installed libtool, autoconf and automake. shtool and install-sh are installed. Any clues on how to get this to configure? Or does anyone know of a repo where I can get an rpm for C7? -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Cannot get php errors to go to a file
Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site. in PHP.INI, it says error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log PHP errors do not go there (or anywhere). 1. Apache has write perms to /tmp 2. I have restarted httpd since changing php.ini 3. The base php.ini is from the development version in /usr/share 4. Selinux is disabled. Ideas? -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get php errors to go to a file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2014 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.10.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Steven Stern: Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site. in PHP.INI, it says error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log PHP errors do not go there (or anywhere). 1. Apache has write perms to /tmp 2. I have restarted httpd since changing php.ini 3. The base php.ini is from the development version in /usr/share 4. Selinux is disabled PrivateTmp=true works as you can see using /tmp for logfiles is plain stupid I changed it to error_log = php_errors.log and now it writes errors into the virtualhost's docroot. How do I put it someplace not accessible to the world, but readily found by me? - -- - -- Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUWXKAAoJEDx7wfUw/4IOn4kH/ArnB6lIXZKbt9p0w7Jk1wmm +K+4b5fcN5ZqMb15J1s0dXqZmcdTnAeCfAV5wYz1OLRuNpwrzfb73WiLea3gMB5O fm8xpSx+wnoEGKLV5EYeHA/uZJHxllL/GqHwTRGJj/EyzOBYRFSoSqdhntmS1Ggz Kj16khzdLPot01C/Ie7RkPMkp1tkawyyhKtn58BWeTtuGBGmdqq+m57XtoE5nEnL MBf3r8XtUxMbTDK5GTOP398rqF6hNDIr3jDfzyf4v+oYCm/gZR9aNZ9hkb35n5HM TImvSeeJj3so9IET60XhX048G0RSt8F4lPBPkHAbC6gD8IgipxEHM9IVs4jenTg= =b7nW -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Cannot get php errors to go to a file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/29/2014 04:07 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 29.10.2014 um 19:54 schrieb Steven Stern: Using basically the same setup that works on C6, I have a C7 site. in PHP.INI, it says error_log = /tmp/php_errors.log PHP errors do not go there (or anywhere). 1. Apache has write perms to /tmp 2. I have restarted httpd since changing php.ini 3. The base php.ini is from the development version in /usr/share 4. Selinux is disabled PrivateTmp=true works as you can see using /tmp for logfiles is plain stupid OK ... final message. I'm logging to syslog which seems both secure and readily findable. - -- - -- Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUUWc2AAoJEDx7wfUw/4IOviQH/iQdriSP1UiMo8vsIQxwiCQt zw6kD3h1BrJxF/hdsx+eUC+kgiQqiWi0OGdI/BhPzGTAr0UK/Tt2LsHJoWp7XPu9 uYeFhYdziBpzK5+8jDEUFXf839GyLtdP6YEnu2ItBOhob87paak2dw+X/EF1/RTo PJGwYjkvVCYXB4inBZQkIkVYUxYIDzxZCJ/Ym+LUpANNcpQ0Pncd82yI7uu6JsQN 5B1Rvjyc9q5adYRblEO2n04DVYQiJCwnoOjtaF7qxIdCcRxIfN7/Znx1AxdbE5Ck KrhhupbP4M6rnZtD/IsdYM2iWU0fUmp11xQueR7biZb07tbUdGMu+OjjHtFO9eY= =QvoI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] C5 : Deleting un-deletable files ?
On 09/13/2014 12:20 PM, Always Learning wrote:
During a routine trawl through the ext3 files, I found some astronomical file
sizes, billions and billions of GB.
They also has strange user and group names.
I can not delete these weird files (the term used by the operating system
utilities).
Here are a few examples. The original files were created on Windoze 98
version 2 circa 2001.
2411957 p--x---rwx 65487 299196551 2101198676775118685 Apr 5
1943 2434.thm
2411959 ?--xr-srwT 6581 42211 24637 1333254828 Jan 30
2029 2435
2411960 -rwxr-xr-x 44608 305922048 3679253821 14580319157523353423 Dec 1
1949 2437
lsattr: Operation not supported While reading flags on .
stat ... A normal file looks this this example:
File: `2436'
Size: 47537 Blocks: 96 IO Block: 4096 regular file
Device: fd00h/64768dInode: 2411956 Links: 1
Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: (0/root) Gid: (0/root)
Access: 2014-09-13 17:36:21.0 +0100
Modify: 2001-02-21 00:52:50.0 +
Change: 2013-03-12 06:26:36.0 +
The problem files look like this:
File: `2434.thm'
Size: 775118685 Blocks: 3429617551 IO Block: 4096 fifo
Device: fd00h/64768dInode: 2411957 Links: 65487
Access: (0107/p--x---rwx) Uid: (299196551/ UNKNOWN) Gid: (2101198676/
UNKNOWN)
Access: 1951-12-14 00:29:38.0 +
Modify: 1943-04-05 10:37:22.0 +0200
Change: 2011-08-13 06:50:44.0 +0100
File: `2435'
Size: 1333254828 Blocks: 1402834881 IO Block: 4096 weird file
Device: fd00h/64768dInode: 2411959 Links: 6581
Access: (3156/?--xr-srwT) Uid: (42211/ UNKNOWN) Gid: (24637/ UNKNOWN)
Access: 1926-11-04 02:28:28.0 +
Modify: 2029-01-30 15:25:30.0 +
Change: 1928-09-14 11:19:14.0 +0100
File: `2437'
Size: 14580319157523353423Blocks: 1664918158 IO Block: 4096 regular
file
Device: fd00h/64768dInode: 2411960 Links: 44608
Access: (0755/-rwxr-xr-x) Uid: (305922048/ UNKNOWN) Gid: (3679253821/
UNKNOWN)
Access: 2014-09-13 17:36:28.0 +0100
Modify: 1949-12-01 22:31:41.0 +
Change: 2030-03-17 01:15:08.0 +
rm: cannot remove `2437': Operation not permitted
However using 'lsattr 2437' to expose the flags, then removing
the flags with 'chattr -{flag) 2437' eventually permitted me to delete
the file with 'rm 2437'.
The remaining two files appear un-touchable.
lsattr 2435
lsattr: Operation not supported While reading flags on 2435
chattr -a 2434.thm ('a' was a random choice)
chattr: Operation not supported while reading flags on 2434.thm
find . -inum 2411959 -exec rm -i {} \;
rm: remove weird file `./2435'? y
rm: cannot remove `./2435': Operation not permitted
All advice, except to transfer everything to a new partition then reformat
the bad partition (which I will do eventually), appreciated.
Have you run an fsck on this partition lately?
--
-- Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] MariaDB repository
My C7 system has mariadb 5.5.37, installed from the Centos repository. The latest version (with a security update is 5.5.39). Mariadb.org has its own repositories, but they don't list Centos 7 as an option. Is anyone using the repository for Centos 6 with Centos 7? See https://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/#mirror=jmudistro=CentOSdistro_release=centos6-amd64version=5.5 -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] MariaDB repository
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/10/2014 10:29 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 09/10/2014 09:58 AM, Steven Stern wrote: My C7 system has mariadb 5.5.37, installed from the Centos repository. The latest version (with a security update is 5.5.39). Mariadb.org has its own repositories, but they don't list Centos 7 as an option. Is anyone using the repository for Centos 6 with Centos 7? See https://downloads.mariadb.org/mariadb/repositories/#mirror=jmudistro=CentOSdistro_release=centos6-amd64version=5.5 Red Hat does backporting for updates, and CentOS rebuilds that backported code. If you look at the security issues you are talking about in mariadb 5.5, you will see that they are ROLLED IN already: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0702.html But backported in the current version. (The list of CVE's patched is on that page) If you have other questions about backporting, read this: https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting So the short message is, if you want to know if a CVE fix is included, you can see on the errata page or here: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/ All the CentOS announcements are here: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes Thanks for the excellent (and reassuring) response. - -- - -- Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUEG9UAAoJEDx7wfUw/4IOZtUH+wZnu7PKPP+13cb0YmR4h/qH O92AOXHevbhtj8FogW7puwLLeyW7ud64d+WctgXXkctkXEEbIakigFmBGryXfHiy FrPquQxKutZTWQ6UYwvhd4huFKv3PrBrmwjzOrcD1yA8N58tUw+yWdsd8hKvxp+I oNhxllHQdU9G1Wb9oGtbYIcQL1hhCkLj5Oh6e3ExVwVLXVcPb+/WMuZRp8yP/cAy DVa1wTM0oolexY+ZMAVNmGQxvx8nL9xEoXDTkQ6F2b9WXo7Dh+7W2TvTWwT+88Fj 6IBduDMuT8IOLduw9upeFodh27L/VY/LFX85HvpGIPFfxVZ2BEfjgJuCkyHKr84= =JO4x -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Minimum RAM for CentOS7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/07/2014 01:31 PM, Oliver Schad wrote: On Sun, 07 Sep 2014 11:08:18 -0700 Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: On 2014-09-07, Oliver Schad cen...@automatic-server.com wrote: With 1 GB RAM everything runs fine. Don't know, what they do with more than 512 MB RAM on a text only system during installation ... Could switch to a different console and bounce on top, if you're interested. 512MB seems really small these days, so I'm guessing you're using this as a small appliance box like a NAT router. No, a basic box for common services like DHCP, DNS, SMTP, Nginx, ... doesn't need much RAM, so 512 MB is really enough. Is there a reason you prefer CentOS over a distro targeted to your application? I don't see a reason, why I should have a zoo of distros. A productive basic installation of CentOS 7 needs ~ 100 MB RAM. Why the installation needs more than 5 times that is really interesting question. Best Regards Oli As soon as you throw in a web server and/or MySQL, you need more. The RAM is really defined by what the system is going to be doing. - -- - -- Steve -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUDKmqAAoJEDx7wfUw/4IOiHEIAMOQLruNhzvZBrlc11VGoZr3 oSMXct9ihuVngPsRlJcdBLxrgmRKVDJIah+qycvEzOrk4E7gNdVtqUVQ/TMLpgHk 0izYrZfIzbJ+ArvBxY53Hb0KJ+QGdr9wgT3FiolZ8li7uS4TflzxTgPmom4xmEn2 itV9AFCtFKjAK3zRNBenRUFLbMaqNQKYLSS9IHwwSq1eswHMleK4YdQzoT93NOBz cH1IRwjGHfLI7VBciHZiQ/YuIWOngS941uR4OrLc/RrnrP54+Xa4sPB3wFcKTUHP GcTUbR+K2DpFonAF6hO0pjc8YXK/v2Q0zRgn49gy6Ifo2Aq2uN2pTKWYVHdLnP8= =mSeA -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] mairadb doesn't prompt for user/pass
On 08/30/2014 10:12 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Hello, I discovered today that CentOS 7 has replaced MySQL with MariaDB. Which is fine, it's seems really similar. And I was already aware that it was written by the original team that wrote mysql. It's cool that the mysql command still gets you in! This is the version I have: [root@web1:~] #mysql --version mysql Ver 15.1 Distrib 5.5.37-MariaDB, for Linux (x86_64) using readline 5.1 But for some reason all I have to do is type the word 'mysql' to get me into the database. That's ok for initial setup I guess. But once I was in a did away with all the accounts that either had blank set for the username, and updated all the accounts to use passwords. MariaDB [mysql] select User,'@',Host,Password from user; +---+---+---+---+ | User | @ | Host | Password | +---+---+---+---+ | root | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 | | root | @ | web1 | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 | | root | @ | 127.0.0.1 | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 | | admin | @ | localhost | *8328225AE4A663FAKEFAKEFAKEFAKEFAKE93D61 | +---+---+---+---+ 4 rows in set (0.00 sec) I also did a search from root to find any my.cnf files and didn't find any that has user accounts in them. Also I find that for the root accounts I can't seem to login even if I set the password in the database without encryption and copy/paste the password into the prompt. However the non-root account (admin) does let you in with the password. So I'm wondering how to secure mariadb so that it doesnt' let you in without typing in a username and password and also why it doesn't let you log in as 'root'? Is the root account disallowed from logging in by default? Thanks Tim my.cnf doesn't have the passwords. When you first set up mysql, you use the mysqladmin command to set the root password. MariaDB doesn't handle the initial set up any differently than MySQL. man mysqladmin C7 does do some stuff differently with the config as the real config files are in /etc/my.cnf.d /etc/my.cnf includes those files to build a config. -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] systemd session abandoned
Things like this keep showing up in my my logs. Any idea what to look for to (1) figure out why and (2) track it to a particular service? systemd: Failed to mark scope session-19.scope as abandoned : Stale file handle -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] systemd session abandoned
On 08/19/2014 03:13 PM, Edward M wrote: On 08/19/14 10:49, Steven Stern wrote: Things like this keep showing up in my my logs. Any idea what to look for to (1) figure out why and (2) track it to a particular service? systemd: Failed to mark scope session-19.scope as abandoned : Stale file handle This may help out: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/?id=f517790db5277fa71d6ae3617244f1acc4b62572 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/tree/src/core/scope.c#n433 I did this service file myself... does anything here look fishy? $ more /etc/systemd/system/dropbox.service [Unit] Description=Dropbox as a system service [Service] ExecStart=/home/sdstern/.dropbox-dist/dropboxd User=sdstern # 'LANG' might be unnecessary, since systemd already sets the # locale for all services according to /etc/locale.conf. # Run `systemctl show-environment` to make sure. Environment=LANG=en_US.utf-8 [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target -- -- Steve ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
