Re: [CentOS] [OT] What is the best network monitoring tool?

[Tim Berger]

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Alejandro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Currently I have a big question.
>
> What is the best OPEN SOURCE solution for monitoring multiple Host and
> Services, for example for using in a WebHosting Provider with 50 hosts or
> more.
>

I've had good luck with "mon".  Written in Perl and supports plug-in monitor
and alert modules.  The modules are easy to write.

It's better than most largely advertised system monitoring/alert packages
because it is simple in design, configuration is flexible, and it supports a
large number of hosts.

http://mon.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page


>
> Currently, I'm using NAGIOS for more than 3 years, this is a incredible
> tool, but before upgrade to version 3, I have this existential question.
>
> Please fill free to recommend any soft, but with this option in mind.
>  1- Easy option to personalize any plug-in
>  2- Good Documentation
>  3- Support large platforms
>  4- Run over Linux
>
> Sorry for me English
> Regards
> Alejandro
> www.linuxiso.com.ar
> from Buenos Aires, Argentina
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>


-- 
-Tim
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Anyone try the 3ware 9650 on CentOS 5.2?

[Tim Berger]

Humm.  I was expecting the newer 5.2 kernel to have an updated 3ware
driver but modinfo indicates that this hasn't changed.  It still shows
as 2.26.02.008 vs the CentOS 4.6 kernel having 2.26.05.007.

Maybe they updated the driver but not the version number?

Does the 3ware driver 2.26.02.008 work well enough with the 9650 or
are we still expected to go get an updated driver from 3ware right
after doing an install?

Thanks everyone.

-- 
-Tim
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos