Re: [CentOS] Video Card [SOLVED]

2008-11-17 Thread Tom Browder
2008/11/17 Michael A. Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
...
> Attached is my config file.
> I'm curious how they differ.

Mike, my current xorg.conf is attached.  It is a little different than
the first one made because I've diddled with the Nvidia settings
utility. I've also attached a virgin one generated from scratch.

-Tom


xorg.conf
Description: Binary data


xorg.conf.virgin
Description: Binary data
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card [SOLVED]

2008-11-16 Thread Tom Browder
A recap of the problems for my configuration: Centos 5.2, x86_64, PNY
9600 GT 512 Mb video, Rosewill R913J 19" LCD monitor, Gigabyte
GA-P35-DS3L mobo, Intel Core 2 Duo, 8 Gb RAM.

Using the latest Nvidia x86_64 driver package (177.82) I could not get
the 1280x1060 resolution (I could get nothing but 640x480).

Additionally, while attempting various fixes, the monitor base color
turned blue.

Cure:

0.  I set run level 3 in /etc/inittab and then executed 'telinit 3' to
work from a text display.

1.  I set the Rosewill in VGA (analog) mode--that is the only mode
that will work with the Nvidia driver (discovered by trial and error).

2.  I deleted the existing xorg.conf file (at /etc/X11).

3.  I used nvidia-xconfig to write a new xorg.conf file.

4.  I initially tested with startx, but that didn't work with my set
up.   I found that using "gdm" let me see a successful X server.

5.  After a successful X start at the desired resolution, I then set
run level 5 and executed 'telinit 5'.

Weird monitor base color:

6.  To reset the monitor base color back to normal I had to clear the
BIOS CMOS memory and reload the BIOS defaults.

Note that the Nvidia list of Linux-capable video cards at
<http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_18897.html> (thanks to John Stanley)
is the one to consult to ensure a card is usable under Linux.

I have found no card manufacturers with any significant degree of tech
support for Linux, so I cannot recommend one over the other (over the
years I have tried cards from MSI, XFX, EVGA, PNY, and others, but it
was always hit or miss--I usually looked at the READMEs with the
Nvidia driver packages but that has proved to be unreliable for
me--once more, thanks to John Stanley for pointing out the other list
that I have always overlooked).

I hope this helps others with weird video problems.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-15 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Mark Pryor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> the desired resolution should be 1280x1020 (19 inch). Your X config needs a 
> modeline for that resolution.

Thanks, Mark, but the mode line was there.  Apparently there are two
problems (I finally got a clue in the xorg log file):

1.  The R913J (not R943J) digital mode seems not to be compatible with
the Nvidia drivers for some reason.

2.  I was using startx to test as I was used to doing in the old days.
 The log file mentioned lost contact with gdm so I entered "gdm"
instead of "startx" and got the desired resolution!

Now I have another problem: somehow in my putzing around the monitor
has taken on a blue hue both in the startup vga mode and the full-up
Nvidia X mode.  Any ideas about that?

I haven't done a hard reboot yet and hope that clears it up--but I'm
putting that off until tomorrow morning.

Regards,

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-15 Thread Tom Browder
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 5:39 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I bought a PNY 9600 GT, installed the latest NVIDIA 64-bit
> drivers (177.82) and I still can't get anything but the 640x480
> display.
>
> BTW, my display is a Rosewill R943J LCD (without EDID).  And I'm using
> its DVI connector.

Hm, any suggestions for a new monitor?  It may be the problem.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-15 Thread Tom Browder
Today I bought a PNY 9600 GT, installed the latest NVIDIA 64-bit
drivers (177.82) and I still can't get anything but the 640x480
display.

BTW, my display is a Rosewill R943J LCD (without EDID).  And I'm using
its DVI connector.

Any ideas?  I'm going to try the analog connector now just for fun: no change.

Any suggestions for an equivalent ATI (AMD) card that is known to work?

Thanks.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-14 Thread Tom Browder
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:41 AM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
>> > http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_18897.html
>> > Will give you the complete supported nvidia cards under
>> linux and the 9500GT
>> > is not Supported. Also the 6300 is not listed either.
...
> ""GeForce 9600 GT 0x0622"" Is supported

No, you were correct:  my newest card is the 9500 GT which I don't see
on the page you referenced (but it is shown in the README with the
latest driver set--that's the confusing part).

In any event, I can't make the 9500 GT work so I'm returning it to
NewEgg and getting another one that shows up on ALL the Nvidia lists:
(1)  Linux-capable, (2) CUDA-enabled, and (3) the README for the
latest driver package.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-13 Thread Tom Browder
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 12:53 PM, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Tom Browder Wrote:
>
>>>I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
>>>Linux, not to speak of Centos.  I need a specific model and brand that
>>>a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for
>>>under Linux.
>
> JohnStanley Writes:
>
> http://www.nvidia.com/object/IO_18897.html
> Will give you the complete supported nvidia cards under linux and the 9500GT
> is not Supported. Also the 6300 is not listed either.

John, thanks.  I wasn't aware of that page.

Nvidia confuses the issue when it lists support with the latest
package run installation.  It states that it supports the 9500 GT.
What gives?

> AFAIK all cards listed on that page using the nvidia drivers will work. Now
> for the ones supporting numeric processing is up to you to figure out. Maybe
> you have one in mind.

Yes, that is fairly clear on the CUDA site.  And AMD has been pretty
helpful, too.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Video Card

2008-11-13 Thread Tom Browder
I want to be able to use a late-model video card with either Nvidia or
ATI (AMD) chips that have the capability to use the GPU for numeric
processing through the CUDA or AMD Stream SDKs.

I can't find any good source for hardware that really works under
Linux, not to speak of Centos.  I need a specific model and brand that
a user has successfully been able to use the proprietary driver for
under Linux.

I have tried EVGA Nvidia 9500 GT with no luck.  I have also tried XFX
6300 XT (not CUDA-capable) and cannot make it work under Centos,
either

I am using Centos 5.2, x86_64 on a Gigabyte mobo with Intel Core 2 Duo.

I appreciate any help,

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Login Feature

2008-07-30 Thread Tom Browder
On 7/30/08, Hywel Richards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Browder wrote:
> > I asked one of my team mates to evaluate centos 5.2 as a more stable
> > distro for our business use than Fedora which we have used for years.
> >
> > His main objection so far has been the lack of a neat feature of
> > recent Fedoras (at least since 7) that allows a user to login as
> > himself if the screen is locked by another user (a switch user
> > feature).
> >
> > Is that feature available or is it planned?
...
> One way to do this is to do Ctrl-Alt-F1 (or F2, F3, etc) to bring up one of
> the plain text terminals, and you can just log in there.
>
> If you just need a text terminal then this is all you need.
>
> If you need a graphical terminal, then in the text terminal you need to
> type:
>
> startx -- :1
>
> and this will bring up your desktop (no need to log in, as you have done
> already).
>
> You can switch between this and the locked terminal by using Ctrl-Alt-F7 and
> Ctrl-Alt-F8 (probably).
>
> When you have finished with your session, you "log out" as usual, and you
> then drop back out to your text terminal (still logged in). You logout from
> that, and then Ctrl-Alt-F7 will bring back the locked terminal.

Thanks, Hywel.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Login Feature

2008-07-30 Thread Tom Browder
I asked one of my team mates to evaluate centos 5.2 as a more stable
distro for our business use than Fedora which we have used for years.

His main objection so far has been the lack of a neat feature of
recent Fedoras (at least since 7) that allows a user to login as
himself if the screen is locked by another user (a switch user
feature).

Is that feature available or is it planned?

Thanks.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5.1

2008-03-19 Thread Tom Browder
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Tom Browder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).
...
> If you already have the 5.0 cdroms then it is probably best to do a
> minimal install with 5.0 then upgrade to 5.1 and then use yum to
> install the actual stuff you need.

Great, Tim, many thanks.

Also thanks to Leonel.

-Tom
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos 5.1

2008-03-19 Thread Tom Browder
I'm about to try Centos 5 (first time user).

Question:  I have the 5.0 CD-ROMs, so can I install with them and them
update to 5.1 via the internet, or should I use the 5.1 CDs?

Thanks.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Centos 5 - Install Hangup

2007-11-08 Thread Tom Browder
On Nov 8, 2007 12:32 PM, Thom Paine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you able to install via NFS from a laptop or anything?

Thanks, Thom, is, I'll try it.  It didn't even cross my mind since
I've always been able to use a CD in YG/RH/FC/F installation.

I'll report back soon.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Centos 5 - Install Hangup

2007-11-08 Thread Tom Browder
I get to where the installation begins copying packages to the new
host and it's time to change CD's to  the second one.  I get the
following message:

  An error occurred unmounting the CD...
  make sure you're not accessing /mnt/source
  from the shell on tty2...click Ok to retry.

I click and nothing changes.

I go to tty2 and see the #ssh prompt and see nothing interfering (and
the umount command doesn't work under the shell).

I've tried this three times and can't get past this point.  It may be
a hardware problem, but other things work on the same system under
Fedora 7.

BTW, old AMD dual CPU, Gigabyte server MOBO, 1.5 Gb RAM, WD IDE drive,
generic IDE CD-RW. ATI Raden graphics card.

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

-Tom

Tom Browder
Niceville, Florida
USA
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos