Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

My thoughts exactly

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
Noob Centos Admin
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 10:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Getting ready for CentOS 5.4


So if it's possible, I'd be more than happy to throw in spare CPU
cycles to help compile some binaries or run automated tests etc!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

I've added the following and it still isn't working

iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8443 -j DNAT
--to-destination 192.168.0.2:8443
iptables -A FORWARD -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 8443 -j ACCEPT

I've enabled forwarding - not sure if it's needed but it's there just in
case.

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Dan Carl
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2009 10:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question

Try this tutorial its long but thorough .
http://iptables-tutorial.frozentux.net/iptables-tutorial.html
There are several examples that you should be able to craft to fit your 
needs.
First you make a forward chain and then prerouting chain with DNAT.
Be advised if you don't have console access you can cut off your access 
very easy with iptables.
Dan



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

There are a few on there and I'm telnetting from a different box on that
network. I'll dig around some more and eventually figure it out. Thanks
for pointing me in the right direction.

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Barry Brimer
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 6:22 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote:

> I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get
>
> Trying 192.168.0.1...
> telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused
>
> I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection.


I assume that you are not telnetting from Box A .. as that will most 
likely not work.  Are there any additional firewall rules on Box A?

Barry


> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Barry Brimer
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question
>
>
>
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement:
>>
>> BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips]
>>
>> BOX B [1 ip]
>>
>> I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on
> BOX
>> A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can
>> anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type
>> arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my
>> situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge
>> with iptables)
>
> iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j
DNAT
> --to 192.168.0.2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] iptables question

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

I add that and telnet to the port on BOX A and get 

Trying 192.168.0.1...
telnet: connect to address 192.168.0.1: Connection refused

I can telnet to that port on BOX B and get a successful connection.

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Barry Brimer
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2009 5:38 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] iptables question



On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement:
>
> BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips]
>
> BOX B [1 ip]
>
> I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on
BOX
> A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can
> anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type
> arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my
> situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge
> with iptables)

iptables -t nat -I PREROUTING -d 192.168.0.1 -p tcp --dport 8080 -j DNAT
--to 192.168.0.2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] iptables question

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

Hi,

I have two servers in the same subnet, one has this arrangement:

BOX A [3 ips, one real two vips]

BOX B [1 ip]

I need to redirect input from one of the vips (192.168.0.1:8080) on BOX
A to BOX B (192.168.0.2:8080) and I'm about to pull my hair out. Can
anyone lend a hand? All my searching leads me to home firewall type
arrangements using DNAT. I tried to bend one of those to fit my
situation but it was a no go (most likely due to my lack of knowledge
with iptables)

Paul Fontenot 

Wells Fargo
Public Key Infrastructure Team
Cryptography Services|IST|EIM|TES|TIG|Wells Fargo
Email: ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com
Phone: (480) 437-7795

This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 5.2 x86_64 DVD

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

I had tried from a couple different mirrors listed on the CentOS page, I 
eventually recalled that ANL mirrors everything and pulled it down from there. 
No issues with the ANL download.

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
John Doe
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2009 2:48 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 5.2 x86_64 DVD


From: "ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com" 
> I’ve pulled this down with Firefox, wget, a bittorrent
> client and an ftp client using Windows as well as Linux hosts. Is something
> wrong with the distributed DVD image? It has failed an MD5 check every time 
> I’ve
> pulled it down.

Mine is 644f9f63f208ebee36ae5e2cdcc58721 as expected...
Did you try from another source?

JD


  

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] 5.2 x86_64 DVD

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

I've pulled this down with Firefox, wget, a bittorrent client and an ftp
client using Windows as well as Linux hosts. Is something wrong with the
distributed DVD image? It has failed an MD5 check every time I've pulled
it down.

 

Paul Fontenot 

 

Wells Fargo

Public Key Infrastructure Team
Cryptography Services|IST|EIM|TES|TIG|Wells Fargo
Email: ward.p.fonte...@wellsfargo.com
 

Phone: (480) 437-7795



This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any information herein. If you have received this
message in error, please advise the sender immediately by reply e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation.

 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] where is PD???

[Ward.P.Fontenot]

ksh-20060214-1.7

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
mcclnx mcc
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 9:52 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] where is PD???

I am installed ORACLE software and it say server did NOT have PD:

Checking for make...found - /usr/bin/make
 Checking for ld... found - /usr/bin/ld
 Checking for cc... found - /usr/bin/cc
 Checking for ar... found - /usr/bin/ar
 Checking for ksh...
 Unable to find PD KSH version.
 Unable to locate all utilities with system path.

The server is CENTOS 5.1 with almost all software installed.  Can anone tell me:

1. where is PD?

2. If I really NOT installed, which RPM should I load?



  
__
付�M才容量�o上限？Yahoo!奇摩��子信箱2.0免�M�o你，信件永�h不必�h！ 
http://tw.mg0.mail.yahoo.com/dc/landing
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos