Re: [CentOS] C8 install problems SOLVED
I burned a total of 7.55Gb from an ISO image to a dual-layer HP DVD+R disc. I got a bootable USB stick containing 8.1 and it's 7.65 Gb so apparently my ISO image file is messed up. I was able to install C8 just fine from the USB stick, so marking this as solved. Thanks, --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] C8 install problems
Hi all, I am trying to install C8 from a DVD I made onto a 1Tb disc partitioned into 2 ext4 partitions. The first partition contains C7 which I installed via a DVD. Trying to install C8 yields an error indicating the file /dev/root is missing. I've checked the SHA256 sum for the ISO for CentOS 8.1 1911 and it checks out fine. I've burned a couple of different DVDs and get the same error about /dev/root missing from both. I burned both DVDs using the PC app PowerISO. Is that potentially a problem ? Looking at the log file of the C8 install I see before the message about /dev/root, that the file /etc/iscsi/initiatorname.iscsi is missing --and /sbin/modprobe -bv sg failed w/ exit code 1 I am doing the install with the target 1Tb disc attached, via a USB cable from a SATA docking station, to a ASUS PC running Windows 7. I boot up via the DVD just fine on the PC, but I've not been able to get past the errors from iSCSI and /dev/root. I do see a message at the very beginning of the install that the hardware family 12h is "not supported upstream". I'm not sure if that message is important, or a red herring. Is it possible that the Orico SATA docking station (model 6619) has been dropped in C8 ? Any tips or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CENTOS8: running wine 32 bits?
Hi Philippe, Check that you have libgcc.i686 installed. --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CENTOS8: running wine 32 bits?
Hi Philippe, To get wine-32 to work on CentOS 7.6 I had to build and install wine 1.8.4 from a tarball. Follow the instructions at: https://wiki.winehq.org/Building_Wine and build the 64-bit version first, then the 32-bit version. Before building either version I installed the following X11 devel pkgs from yum: libX11-devel.i686 libxcb-devel.i686 libXext-devel.i686 Depending on your setup on CentOS8 you may need additional X11 devel pkgs, or gecko or others. Good luck, --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] ldd question on CentOS 6.8 (64bit)
Hi all, Will ldd display the paths to different libraries depending on their locations? I'm trying to build libxml2 version 2.9.6 in /usr/local with a newer version of zlib (1.2.8) than what are in the system folders for CentOS 6.8. I get the following output from ldd: $ ldd ./libxml2.so ./libxml2.so: /lib64/libz.so.1: version `ZLIB_1.2.3.3' not found (required by ./libxml2.so) linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x7ffeb1789000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x7fce9e824000) libz.so.1 => /lib64/libz.so.1 (0x7fce9e60e000) <-- I expected /usr/local/lib here libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x7fce9e389000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7fce9dff5000) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x003d52a0) Yet the make itself for libxml2 seemed to exit without error. >From otool on Mac OSX (same installation of libxml2/zlib) I see: %otool -L libxml2.2.dylib libxml2.2.dylib: /usr/local/lib/libxml2.2.dylib (compatibility version 12.0.0, current version 12.6.0) /usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 88.1.12) /usr/local/lib/libz.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.2.8) /usr/local/lib/libiconv.2.dylib (compatibility version 9.0.0, current version 9.0.0) /usr/local/lib/libgcc_s.1.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current version 1.0.0) libxml2, libz and libiconv were all installed in /usr/local so as not to over-write the OS versions. Will ldd show similar correct paths for component libraries as otool does? I'm trying to track down if there is an error in the Makefile target for the link phase of the library. Thanks, --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] JRE 8.1 for CentOS6
> When I put in http it changes it back to https That's common now that everyone puts re-directs in to force everyone to use https. Can you get to the Apache logs on the remote machine? They may have more info. The error about Java 1.8 might be a red-herring. If the remote machine uses Perl on the backend, you might try setting the shell env variable OPENSSL_PREFIX to point on your local CentOS6 box to a newer version of openssl that handles the TLS handshake. The CPAN module Net::SSLeay uses that variable (if set) to use the specified OpenSSL library. --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Help w/Error #14 in grub legacy in CentOS 6.8
Hi all, I am getting Error #14 from grub version 0.97 when trying to boot for the first time into a newly installed partition with Scientific Linux 6.7 and need help resolving the error. The setup: MacPro with 2 HDs HD #1: ESP partition has rEFInd installed and running 2nd partition: Mac OSX 10.7.5 (lion) installed HD #2: 1st partition: Centos 6.8 (uses grub version 0.97) filesystem = ext4 2nd partition: Debian 8.7 (uses grub 2.0.2 beta). filesystem = ext4 3rd partition: Scientific Linux 6.7 (uses grub version 0.97). filesystem = ext4 The grub.conf in the CentOS partition has the following entries: title CentOS 6.8 (2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64) root (hd0,0) kernel /boot/vmlimuz-2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64 ro root=UUID=531c3b86-dc7e-4d14-9505-6df970dc8495 rd_NO_LUKS rd_NO_LVM LANG=en_US.UTF-8 rd_no_MD SYSFONT=latarcyrheb=sun16 crashkernel=128M KEYBOARDTYPE=pc KEYTABLE=us rd_NO_DM rhgb quiet initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-696.el6.x86_64.img title Debian 8.7 root (hd0,1) chainloader +1 title Scientific Linux 6.7 (Carbon) root(hd0,2) kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64 ro root=UUID=af382492-c826-4cf8-b134-9456fe5c100c initrd /boot/initramfs-2.6.32-573.el6.x86_64.img chainloader +1 I can boot fine into the Mac OSX from rEFInd. When I boot from rEFInd into the CentOS partition I get the Grub version 0.97 menu list with the 3 OSs listed above. I can then boot fine into CentOS 6.8 or Debian 8.7 just fine. I just added Scientific Linux 6.7 (SL) from a downloaded ISO image to the 3rd partition. SL installed fine. The installation itself was done using a PC (AMD64) running Windows 7 and the HD connected via USB and a mobile SATA dock. But using the above grub config for SL I get Error #14. If I comment-out the kernel and initrd lines in the SL entry I get Error #13. I confirmed that the kernel and the initramfs files both are in /boot in SL. I also checked the UUID for the 3rd partition with blkid and that is correct too. If I replace the kernel line for SL with the same one in the SL parititon I still get Error #14. The only difference with the full CentOS and SL kernel entries are the UUIDs of the partition and the minor version # (696 vs 573). I haven't seen anything specific to Error #14 in the blog entries I've seen. Everything I've tried results in either Error #14 or 13. I do think the SL partition will boot if given the correct grub conf to start with. Any tips or ideas would be greatly appreciated! Thanks, --Ed ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
