Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Hi Guys, Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10 without damaging the cluster suite and I was suggested the best way is to reinstall the entire cluster suite. There are few suggestions around this but they are not tested. So I would not like to take a risk with untested solution. So now I will start looking for feasibility of upgrading the entire suite. This may take sometime but I guess at some stage it needs to be done. On Friday, 28 March 2014 12:11 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote: On 03/27/2014 08:51 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 03/27/2014 07:37 AM, Steve Clark wrote: On 03/27/2014 08:26 AM, Robert Heller wrote: At Thu, 27 Mar 2014 02:52:51 -0700 (PDT) CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org wrote: Hi Alexnder, Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running with cluster suite and its a production unit.  Moreover its not feasible to upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lying on the system. Backing all of this not very continent. First of all, you can update to 5.10 using yum (a 'yum update' will automagically update to 5.10). I don't know how this would affect the clustering, though. Regards Hersh On Thursday, 27 March 2014 1:30 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Am 27.03.2014 06:22, schrieb Hersh Parikh: Hi Frank, Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos 5.4? Right, you can't. If you install a different glibc than the one provided by CentOS 5, then your system will be completely broken. The glibc is a very important and central library set for the system. Regards Hersh Btw. CentOS 5.4 is outdated, vulnerable and the current release is 5.10. Please update. Alexander As I just pointed out in a previous email to the list - I did a yum upgrade from 6.4 to 6.5 and is broke our OSPF network. I had to revert back to the last 6.4 kernel to get it working again. That certainly does happen and individual packages can be excluded (and the bugs reported) ... but upgrades still need to happen whenever possible. We have released 4 different kernels since 6.5 (so 5 kernels including the one on the 6.5 iso ... so keep checking if it works). Again, these updates happen because there are issues that need to be fixed, and it is very important that they get applied. Hi Johnny, First let me thank you and the CentOS team for the great work that you do! Secondly I don't disagree about the need to keep our systems current, but Hersh indicated that this was a clustered production system and I was merely pointing out that there could be breakage by doing an upgrade. Regards, -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200 Fax: 813-882-0209 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com http://www.netwolves.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Sure. Will do so. Thanks!! :) On Friday, 28 March 2014 4:18 PM, Tru Huynh t...@centos.org wrote: On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 02:33:05AM -0700, Hersh Parikh wrote: Hi Guys, Thanks for your valuable suggestion. I will keep them in mind. I have checked whether there is a way to update to Centos to 5.10 without damaging the cluster suite and I was suggested the best way is to reinstall the entire cluster suite. There are few suggestions around ... Next time, just say that your are using Rocks which is managing your CentOS distribution and not a plain CentOS-5 setup ;) Cheers, Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos pgpjPkjASLWEc.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Hi Alexnder, Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running with cluster suite and its a production unit. Moreover its not feasible to upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lying on the system. Backing all of this not very continent. Regards Hersh On Thursday, 27 March 2014 1:30 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Am 27.03.2014 06:22, schrieb Hersh Parikh: Hi Frank, Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos 5.4? Right, you can't. If you install a different glibc than the one provided by CentOS 5, then your system will be completely broken. The glibc is a very important and central library set for the system. Regards Hersh Btw. CentOS 5.4 is outdated, vulnerable and the current release is 5.10. Please update. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Hi Johnny, Thanks for the explanation. yes I do understand that critical patches needs to be applied for any OS. But in this case it is not a stand alone machine, it is a cluster suite and OS was not installed separately. I would have definitely upgraded the system if this was stand alone box. If I remember correctly, long back I was suggested not to upgrade cluster suite due to various reasons. Though I will check on this and see if its upgradable. If it is, I will try it out. On Thursday, 27 March 2014 5:10 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 03/27/2014 04:52 AM, Hersh Parikh wrote: Hi Alexnder, Thanks for the info. I know its quite old but I cant update as its running with cluster suite and its a production unit. Moreover its not feasible to upgrade as I have hundreds for apps and data lying on the system. Backing all of this not very continent. Regards Hersh Then let's hope that none of you machines touch the internet in any way. Staying on any version of CentOS except the latest in a branch is not safe. CentOS-5.10 is CentOS-5.4 with just bugfix and security updates. CentOS-5 is safe, CentOS-5.10 is safe. CentOS-5.4 is unsafe. For the record, there are more than 300 security updates released, dozens of them rated as Critical after 5.4 in the CentOS-5 tree (currently 5.10). Critical means remotely exploitable. Updates within a branch (that is, updates that stay on the CentOS-5 family in this case) SHOULD work and not break things. Obviously bugs happen and sometimes things do not work ... that should be the exception, not the rule. It is imperative that people install security updates, otherwise it is not a question of if, but when their machines will be exploited. On Thursday, 27 March 2014 1:30 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote: Am 27.03.2014 06:22, schrieb Hersh Parikh: Hi Frank, Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos 5.4? Right, you can't. If you install a different glibc than the one provided by CentOS 5, then your system will be completely broken. The glibc is a very important and central library set for the system. Regards Hersh Btw. CentOS 5.4 is outdated, vulnerable and the current release is 5.10. Please update. Alexander ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Hi, I am trying to run a software which requires a specific version of glib(GLIBC_2.7). Current version of GLIB on my system is 2.5 and error which I am getting is - -- [hp@mysys example]$ /share/apps/CAP3/cap3: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.7' not found (required by /share/apps/CAP3/cap3) -- [root@mysys scratch]# ldd --version ldd (GNU libc) 2.5 Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Written by Roland McGrath and Ulrich Drepper. - I have tried to upgrade the package with both yum and rpm but it failed. Here is what I got when I tried yum upgrade. Can anyone help in fixing this? Btw, I am running CentOS 5.4 -- [root@mysys scratch]# yum update glib* http://xx.xx.xx.xx/install/rocks-dist/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 4] IOError: urlopen error (113, 'No route to host') Trying other mirror. Setting up Update Process Examining glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm: 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 Marking glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm as an update to glibc-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 Marking glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm as an update to glibc-2.5-118.el5_10.2.i686 Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-devel -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: nscd -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-devel -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-headers -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-devel -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: nscd -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-devel -- Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 for package: glibc-headers --- Package glibc.x86_64 6:2.7-12.2mnb1 set to be updated -- Processing Dependency: dash-static for package: glibc -- Processing Dependency: dash-static for package: glibc -- Processing Dependency: /bin/dash.static for package: glibc -- Processing Dependency: /bin/dash.static for package: glibc -- Processing Conflict: glibc-common conflicts glibc 2.5 -- Finished Dependency Resolution glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.i386 (installed) glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) glibc-headers-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 from /glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: /bin/dash.static is needed by package 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 (/glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64) nscd-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package nscd-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 from /glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: dash-static is needed by package 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 (/glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64) glibc-common-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems -- glibc-common conflicts with glibc Error: Missing Dependency: dash-static is needed by package 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 (/glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64) Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package nscd-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) Error: glibc-common conflicts with glibc Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-headers-2.5-118.el5_10.2.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: glibc = 2.5-118.el5_10.2 is needed by package glibc-devel-2.5-118.el5_10.2.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: /bin/dash.static is needed by package 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 (/glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: package-cleanup --problems package-cleanup --dupes rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. Regards Hersh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] GLIBC_2.7 not found
Hi Frank, Thanks for quick response. Does it mean that I cant have glib 2.7 on centos 5.4? Regards Hersh On Thursday, 27 March 2014 10:27 AM, Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 21:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Hersh Parikh wrote: Examining glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64.rpm: 6:glibc-2.7-12.2mnb1.x86_64 I think mnb means that you have a Mandriva rpm there; nothing to do with Centos. The current version of glibc on Centos 5 is glibc-2.5-118.el5_10.2 -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VMware restricting to 3GB RAM
Host has 128GB RAM and its running CentOS 5.4 64 bit architect, Guest is 64 bit ubuntu 12.04, VMware Player I am using is 6.1 @Luigi- I have seen this thread and I have a Q around this. How do I know what hardware(e.g. 10/9/8) do I have? Regards Hersh On Monday, 20 January 2014 12:16 PM, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hersh Parikh said the following on 20/01/2014 07:17: I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error stating- Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could not initiate memory hot plug. I understand from few threads that 32bit OS has this kind of limitation but I am able to understand why I am seeing this issue when I am using 64bit OS and VMware player is also for 64bit. Check this VMware article and see if you fall within the limitations described: Virtual machine memory limits and hardware versions (1014006) http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=1014006 Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Even bytes get lonely for a little bit. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS3MYgAAoJEO5WT/qgw4yKmvMP/jHUEeaGmdPQhD8ET/JNoON2 a9Sb5pLuP1SvrjajxA0QCdALime4Vx92hfWrOLp1es4T0DlY9RJ4TRIREgjqo5Pk Sm8ZAcDsUhjrrSsGbtu+7uuHX/lQ5Q+GCWS+RXCMcvq8dcBTnK/C6HObyYTu7WXw fIRjHg2qQ60AUWxSxwdauwD66Kgxm4cZRwulAxvQ0hICt6nJ1wxkcLywhXuheLYC sSEIChu4VVTb5k0wlYxChE6ePWTIVeThHgCkdHOASLgfJDQAV1nDe7PG+47dHbYr lW7hVRe/kkZVE7LcnVL1WhykSuDIoxjOCl2NDxwjYsAH7RDj6QmOV2yCXmsLWbtb sogsUvgC5MvVQXed7U27g2e5RPJcVObMEC5uQ+yeONw97e8mifttoWEVVvRfjLBy di4pkBF53b7KUEI7zjAkTDvlbZNEHy5NyhWY/6g8T51Bp9TLMkszNRK23OlSgPHA IRCF3iXlX6QmAa5u7+o6xLvUUD28tVRH2FsjSSt56MYZioAYiyRV0BEHNANyByC9 QPMieJcXBL4NV2XofBgd5i4TxqdPqRMoe8E9NsFd2fshF05jakXMuwU2r0SGLXJw DvUZNxL7UIlvtAfdQljMOH+qnttSlsGS8nCXY1qgF8/VRM83nniqCYBUEt5m9obC WFRR29cGS8rR9kLKHOWu =4VFz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] VMware restricting to 3GB RAM
Hi All, Thanks for your comments. Finally figured out the way. Upgrading VMwaretools did the trick. Regards Hersh On Monday, 20 January 2014 3:07 PM, Fabrizio Di Carlo dicarlo.fabri...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Hersh, to know hardware version you can use this table: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=1003746 On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:31 AM, Hersh Parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com wrote: Host has 128GB RAM and its running CentOS 5.4 64 bit architect, Guest is 64 bit ubuntu 12.04, VMware Player I am using is 6.1 @Luigi- I have seen this thread and I have a Q around this. How do I know what hardware(e.g. 10/9/8) do I have? Regards Hersh On Monday, 20 January 2014 12:16 PM, Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hersh Parikh said the following on 20/01/2014 07:17: I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error stating- Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could not initiate memory hot plug. I understand from few threads that 32bit OS has this kind of limitation but I am able to understand why I am seeing this issue when I am using 64bit OS and VMware player is also for 64bit. Check this VMware article and see if you fall within the limitations described: Virtual machine memory limits and hardware versions (1014006) http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_UScmd=displayKCexternalId=1014006 Ciao, luigi - -- / +--[Luigi Rosa]-- \ Even bytes get lonely for a little bit. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS3MYgAAoJEO5WT/qgw4yKmvMP/jHUEeaGmdPQhD8ET/JNoON2 a9Sb5pLuP1SvrjajxA0QCdALime4Vx92hfWrOLp1es4T0DlY9RJ4TRIREgjqo5Pk Sm8ZAcDsUhjrrSsGbtu+7uuHX/lQ5Q+GCWS+RXCMcvq8dcBTnK/C6HObyYTu7WXw fIRjHg2qQ60AUWxSxwdauwD66Kgxm4cZRwulAxvQ0hICt6nJ1wxkcLywhXuheLYC sSEIChu4VVTb5k0wlYxChE6ePWTIVeThHgCkdHOASLgfJDQAV1nDe7PG+47dHbYr lW7hVRe/kkZVE7LcnVL1WhykSuDIoxjOCl2NDxwjYsAH7RDj6QmOV2yCXmsLWbtb sogsUvgC5MvVQXed7U27g2e5RPJcVObMEC5uQ+yeONw97e8mifttoWEVVvRfjLBy di4pkBF53b7KUEI7zjAkTDvlbZNEHy5NyhWY/6g8T51Bp9TLMkszNRK23OlSgPHA IRCF3iXlX6QmAa5u7+o6xLvUUD28tVRH2FsjSSt56MYZioAYiyRV0BEHNANyByC9 QPMieJcXBL4NV2XofBgd5i4TxqdPqRMoe8E9NsFd2fshF05jakXMuwU2r0SGLXJw DvUZNxL7UIlvtAfdQljMOH+qnttSlsGS8nCXY1qgF8/VRM83nniqCYBUEt5m9obC WFRR29cGS8rR9kLKHOWu =4VFz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift. (A. Einstein) La mente intuitiva è un dono sacro e la mente razionale è un fedele servo. Noi abbiamo creato una società che onora il servo e ha dimenticato il dono. (A. Einstein) Fabrizio Di Carlo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] VMware restricting to 3GB RAM
Hi, I am running VMware player on CentOS 5.4 and its working fine. However it does not allow me to increase the RAM more than 3GB. It keeps throwing error stating- Requested memory size is greater than allowed maximum of 3072 MB. Could not initiate memory hot plug. I understand from few threads that 32bit OS has this kind of limitation but I am able to understand why I am seeing this issue when I am using 64bit OS and VMware player is also for 64bit. Regards Hersh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Congratulations to the Centos Team for the hard work on Centos 6
Kudos for development team... Thank you for all your efforts From: Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 11 July 2011 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Congratulations to the Centos Team for the hard work on Centos 6 2011/7/11 Luigi Rosa li...@luigirosa.com: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Philip L Pinto said the following on 11/07/11 06:11: I just wanted to say Congratulations and thank you to the Centos Team for all of the work on Centos 6 - +1 Great. +1. Now just waiting for Centos 6.1 br, -- Eero ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package
It says [root@server]# yum list xfig Rocks-5.4 | 1.1 kB 00:00 rpmforge | 1.1 kB 00:00 Error: No matching Packages to list [root@server]# From: Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 21 March 2011 5:29 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 7:08 AM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote: From: hersh parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr xfig and transfig are in centos 5, why don't you just use the regular centos repo? We have tried it says no packages available..if its working for you can you please paste you .conf file here? Strange... As said, it is in the CentOS base repo.. # yum list xfig ... Available Packages xfig.x86_64 3.2.4-21.3.el5 base http://vault.centos.org/5.5/os/i386/CentOS/xfig-3.2.4-21.3.el5.i386.rpm http://vault.centos.org/5.5/os/x86_64/CentOS/xfig-3.2.4-21.3.el5.x86_64.rpm What does yum list xfig say? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package
May be our repository is different then yours. Since it's working for you can you paste baseurls in your yum repo fie? It would be very useful. Regards Hersh From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 21 March 2011 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package From: hersh parikh hershparik...@yahoo.com From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr xfig and transfig are in centos 5, why don't you just use the regular centos repo? We have tried it says no packages available..if its working for you can you please paste you .conf file here? Strange... As said, it is in the CentOS base repo.. # yum list xfig ... Available Packages xfig.x86_64 3.2.4-21.3.el5 base http://vault.centos.org/5.5/os/i386/CentOS/xfig-3.2.4-21.3.el5.i386.rpm http://vault.centos.org/5.5/os/x86_64/CentOS/xfig-3.2.4-21.3.el5.x86_64.rpm JD ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package
Yes Alain is absolutely right about ROCKS. @Alain: Thanks for the information. We'll check what we have in stand alone CentOS.BTW what do you have in yum.conf file? Regards Hersh From: Alain Péan alain.p...@lpp.polytechnique.fr To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Monday, 21 March 2011 7:00 PM Subject: Fw: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package Le 21/03/2011 13:47, Drew a écrit : You don't have your base CentOS repository configured. What have you done to /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo, or have you been doing something strange to /etc/yum.conf? And what is this Rocks-5.4 repository? Rocks 5.4 is a recompile of CentOS 5 oriented towards compute clusters. Rocks 5.4 is not a recompile of CentOS 5, it uses CentOS as its base distribution, and add configuration, database, tools, MPI, batch job scheduler etc..., for HPC calculation. As a yum update may break the configuration, /etc/yum.repos.d/ is empty by default. I use myself Rocks, an I populate /etc/yum/repos.d/ by copying what I have on other CentOS workstations, but avoid to do any update. With Rocks, you do update by upgrading to the newest version (which would be Rocks 5.5, based on CentOS 5.6...). Alain -- == Alain Péan - LPP/CNRS Administrateur Système/Réseau Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas - UMR 7648 Observatoire de Saint-Maur 4, av de Neptune, Bat. A 94100 Saint-Maur des Fossés Tel : 01-45-11-42-39 - Fax : 01-48-89-44-33 == ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package
We have tried it says no packages available..if its working for you can you please paste you .conf file here? From: Nicolas Thierry-Mieg nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Friday, 18 March 2011 7:35 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Add repo for xfig package hersh parikh wrote: Hi All We want to install packages like xfig and transfig on centos 5.5. We found rpms available but them but it seems there are lot of dependencies for these packages. So we would like to setup yum repo for this. Can anyone suggest trusted baseurl for yum repo? xfig and transfig are in centos 5, why don't you just use the regular centos repo? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Add repo for xfig package
Hi All We want to install packages like xfig and transfig on centos 5.5. We found rpms available but them but it seems there are lot of dependencies for these packages. So we would like to setup yum repo for this. Can anyone suggest trusted baseurl for yum repo? Regards Hersh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] R package on centos 5.1
Hi I want to install R package on centos 5.1, however I am not able to install it . Can anyone please tell me how can I install R on centos 5.1? Thank you Hersh Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
