Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread Gene Brandt
Great information to know.  That sounds like a very nasty situation.
--
Thanks,

Gene Brandt SCSA 
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA 70123

home 504-737-4295

cell 504-452-3250

Family Web Page  |  My Web Page  | LinkedIn  | Facebook  |  Resumebucket


On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 12:40 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:

> On 01/06/11 11:11 AM, Gene Brandt wrote:
> > Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from 
> > hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to 
> > configure and it works!
> 
> its not actually hardware raid.
> 
> when you set the 'raid mode' in the BIOS, at power up it sets a bit in 
> the ICH chip which changes its PCI DeviceID from 'regular SATA 
> controller' to 'Intel Matrix FakeRaid'.thats *ALL* it does, change 
> the device ID. no other hardware changes.the controller is still a 
> plain old multiport SATA controller.
> 
> the device ID is used to pick which driver by the OS plug-n-play 
> stuff.   the regular setting choses the regular SATA driver while the 
> 'fakeraid' setting loads the fakeraid driver (dmraid in Linux).the 
> fakeraid driver implements all the raid in the device driver.This is 
> only really useful for MS Windows non-Server distributions which don't 
> support native mirroring or whatever in the OS.
> 
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread aurfalien
> On 01/06/11 11:11 AM, Gene Brandt wrote:
>> Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from
>> hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to
>> configure and it works!
>
> its not actually hardware raid.
>
> when you set the 'raid mode' in the BIOS, at power up it sets a bit in
> the ICH chip which changes its PCI DeviceID from 'regular SATA
> controller' to 'Intel Matrix FakeRaid'.thats *ALL* it does, change
> the device ID. no other hardware changes.the controller is still a
> plain old multiport SATA controller.
>
> the device ID is used to pick which driver by the OS plug-n-play
> stuff.   the regular setting choses the regular SATA driver while the
> 'fakeraid' setting loads the fakeraid driver (dmraid in Linux).the
> fakeraid driver implements all the raid in the device driver. 
> This is
> only really useful for MS Windows non-Server distributions which don't
> support native mirroring or whatever in the OS.

Hi John,

Another reason to use SW raid which I have switched too.

Although the conversation did generate some really good info.

Yea, that Intel RAID is a real POS.

- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread John R Pierce
On 01/06/11 11:11 AM, Gene Brandt wrote:
> Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from 
> hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to 
> configure and it works!

its not actually hardware raid.

when you set the 'raid mode' in the BIOS, at power up it sets a bit in 
the ICH chip which changes its PCI DeviceID from 'regular SATA 
controller' to 'Intel Matrix FakeRaid'.thats *ALL* it does, change 
the device ID. no other hardware changes.the controller is still a 
plain old multiport SATA controller.

the device ID is used to pick which driver by the OS plug-n-play 
stuff.   the regular setting choses the regular SATA driver while the 
'fakeraid' setting loads the fakeraid driver (dmraid in Linux).the 
fakeraid driver implements all the raid in the device driver.This is 
only really useful for MS Windows non-Server distributions which don't 
support native mirroring or whatever in the OS.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread Gene Brandt
Thanks for that bit of advice. I've never been able to recover from
hardware raid on any Intel system. The software raid is simple to
configure and it works!

--
Thanks,

Gene Brandt SCSA 
8625 Carriage Road
River Ridge, LA 70123

home 504-737-4295

cell 504-452-3250

Family Web Page  |  My Web Page  | LinkedIn  | Facebook  |  Resumebucket


On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 11:08 -0800, aurfal...@gmail.com wrote:

> > You are much better off disabling the fake raid in bios and just using
> > software raid:
> >
> > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
> >
> > http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-raid-config.html
> >
> > Or Google: centos 5 software raid.
> 
> Thanks Matt.
> 
> I have done sw raid on Centos before and have never had issues with it.
> .
> I think I will try it in this case, good idea.
> 
> - aurf
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread aurfalien
> You are much better off disabling the fake raid in bios and just using
> software raid:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5
>
> http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-raid-config.html
>
> Or Google: centos 5 software raid.

Thanks Matt.

I have done sw raid on Centos before and have never had issues with it.
.
I think I will try it in this case, good idea.

- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread Matt
> Hi all,
>
> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>
> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
>
> When starting my install, Anaconda throws an exception.
>
> After a brief goog, I see one possible fix is - at the install prompt,
> type;
>
> linux text nodmraid
>
> This is fine and all but Centos sees 2 disks at this point rather then
> 1 which is what I thought the Intel RAID controller would present to
> the OS.
>
> I am pretty much tarded when it comes to installs as I usually boot of
> a DVD, enter some choices based on requirements and off I go.
>
> I once compiled a network driver into the initrd and remade my boot
> disk but that seems beyond me now.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.

You are much better off disabling the fake raid in bios and just using
software raid:

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SoftwareRAIDonCentOS5

http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Deployment_Guide-en-US/s1-raid-config.html

Or Google: centos 5 software raid.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread aurfalien

On Jan 6, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:

> aurfal...@gmail.com wrote on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:55:14 -0800:
>
>> linux text smenodmraid
>
> This a parameter unknown to Google. Did you make it up, or where did  
> you
> get it from?

Well, I wished I would have made it up as we all ride on the coat  
tails of some one else's research and findings, but I found it here;

http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6181

> me, too ;-) At least, "nodmraid" is not the solution.

Yea, the nodmraid didn't work in text mode anyways, but I did a re  
install in text mode w/o using nosmedmraid and it failed so in my  
case, using smenodmraid worked.

- aurf
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
aurfal...@gmail.com wrote on Wed, 5 Jan 2011 18:55:14 -0800:

> linux text smenodmraid

This a parameter unknown to Google. Did you make it up, or where did you 
get it from?

> Although I've a feeling that just installing in text mode rather than  
> GUI would have been enough.

me, too ;-) At least, "nodmraid" is not the solution. That's just ignoring 
the fake RAID if it is able to detect it. dmraid is meant to deal with 
this fake RAID stuff, but can't always.

Kai

-- 
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-05 Thread aurfalien

On Jan 5, 2011, at 6:09 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM,   wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>>
>> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.
>
> "Intel RAID" covers a lot of sins.

Yes, I like this, and a lot of BS.

> Some RAID cards rely on OS software
> to do much of the RAID: they're jokes, really. If it's a real RAID
> chipset, no Linux or Windows kernel should even be *AWARE* of the
> multiple disks, except perhaps for some limited reporting tools.
>
> Exactly which chipset are you dealing with? On what kind of machine.

Instead of typing this;

>> linux text nodmraid

I used this;

linux text smenodmraid

... and all is well.

Although I've a feeling that just installing in text mode rather than  
GUI would have been enough.

My specs;

Supermicro X8DT3-LN4F with the Intel 5520 chipset.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-05 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:36 PM,   wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.
>
> My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.

"Intel RAID" covers a lot of sins. Some RAID cards rely on OS software
to do much of the RAID: they're jokes, really. If it's a real RAID
chipset, no Linux or Windows kernel should even be *AWARE* of the
multiple disks, except perhaps for some limited reporting tools.

Exactly which chipset are you dealing with? On what kind of machine.

> When starting my install, Anaconda throws an exception.
>
> After a brief goog, I see one possible fix is - at the install prompt,
> type;
>
> linux text nodmraid
>
> This is fine and all but Centos sees 2 disks at this point rather then
> 1 which is what I thought the Intel RAID controller would present to
> the OS.
>
> I am pretty much tarded when it comes to installs as I usually boot of
> a DVD, enter some choices based on requirements and off I go.
>
> I once compiled a network driver into the initrd and remade my boot
> disk but that seems beyond me now.
>
> Any help is greatly appreciated.
>
> - aurf
>
>
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] centos 5.5 install + intel raid

2011-01-05 Thread aurfalien
Hi all,

Installing 5.5 on a fresh system having an Intel RAID.

My 2 drives are configured as a mirror within the Intel BIOS.

When starting my install, Anaconda throws an exception.

After a brief goog, I see one possible fix is - at the install prompt,  
type;

linux text nodmraid

This is fine and all but Centos sees 2 disks at this point rather then  
1 which is what I thought the Intel RAID controller would present to  
the OS.

I am pretty much tarded when it comes to installs as I usually boot of  
a DVD, enter some choices based on requirements and off I go.

I once compiled a network driver into the initrd and remade my boot  
disk but that seems beyond me now.

Any help is greatly appreciated.

- aurf



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread Digimer
On 10-05-19 10:33 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:
>
>>
>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
>
> I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
> to do it here:
>
> http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS
>
> Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
> Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
> walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> I edited the files last night and got it set like it was.
>
> Sometimes it's easier to just move the cables... Or have someone on site
> do it.

This is sometimes possible, but not always. Here are a few cases I can 
think of where it isn't:

* If you've got IPMI piggy-backing on a physical interface, you may not 
want it to be on an Internet-facing LAN.
* If you have a particularly fast ethernet device you need for a storage 
network.
* If you've got a subnet that needs to use jumbo frames but only one NIC 
supports frames large enough for your application...

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail: li...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread Digimer
On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Digimer wrote:
>> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>>
>>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
>>
>> I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
>> to do it here:
>>
>> http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS
>>
>> Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
>> Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
>> walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.
>>
>
> nice, but a couple of comments:
> you have DEVICE=eth0 in all ifcfg-ethX files, shouldn't these match?
> you have the same HWADDR for the intel and d-link, you probably should
> have 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE for the d-link?

It's fixed, thanks for catching that and letting me know. :)

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail: li...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread Les Mikesell
On 5/19/2010 8:25 AM, tdu...@sc.rr.com wrote:

>
> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.

 I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
 to do it here:

 http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS

 Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
 Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
 walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.

>
> Thanks,
>
> I edited the files last night and got it set like it was.

Sometimes it's easier to just move the cables... Or have someone on site 
do it.

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread tdukes

 Digimer  wrote: 
> On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> > Digimer wrote:
> >> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> >>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
> >>>
> >>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> >>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
> >>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
> >>
> >> I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
> >> to do it here:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS
> >>
> >> Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
> >> Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
> >> walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.
> >>

Thanks,

I edited the files last night and got it set like it was.

Eddie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread Digimer
On 10-05-19 07:10 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Digimer wrote:
>> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>>
>>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
>>
>> I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
>> to do it here:
>>
>> http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS
>>
>> Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
>> Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
>> walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.
>>
>
> nice, but a couple of comments:
> you have DEVICE=eth0 in all ifcfg-ethX files, shouldn't these match?
> you have the same HWADDR for the intel and d-link, you probably should
> have 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE for the d-link?

Doh! I'll fix that in a couple of hours, thanks for pointing that out!

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail: li...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-19 Thread Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Digimer wrote:
> On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
>> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>>
>> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
>> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
>> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.
>
> I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how
> to do it here:
>
> http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS
>
> Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the
> Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step
> walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.
>

nice, but a couple of comments:
you have DEVICE=eth0 in all ifcfg-ethX files, shouldn't these match?
you have the same HWADDR for the intel and d-link, you probably should 
have 00:AA:BB:CC:DD:EE for the d-link?

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-18 Thread Digimer
On 10-05-18 08:51 PM, Thomas Dukes wrote:
> Just installed from scratch 5.5
>
> Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
> this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
> this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.

I've had to swap out the ethX mapping enough times that I wrote down how 
to do it here:

http://wiki.alteeve.com/index.php/Changing_the_ethX_to_Ethernet_Device_Mapping_in_Red_Hat/CentOS

Sorry for the long URL. Also, it's a side page to a larger paper, so the 
Xen stuff you can ignore. Other than that, it's a step-by-step 
walkthrough on swapping the ethX devices around.

-- 
Digimer
E-Mail: li...@alteeve.com
AN!Whitepapers: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin:  http://nodeassassin.org
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] 5.5 install

2010-05-18 Thread Thomas Dukes
Just installed from scratch 5.5

Weird, eth0 is now eth1 and eth1 is eth0. Don't even know how I'm sending
this message as the the CentOS machine can't connect to the internet and
this windoze box uses the Centos box as a gateway.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos