[CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
Hi, I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata gets mixed up. Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: Hi, I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata gets mixed up. Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. reposync uses whatever config file you point it at with "-c", only using /etc/yum.conf if you don't bother. jh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 12:11:29PM +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only > tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. > Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum > config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense > and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata > gets mixed up. > Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them > so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. You might try "dnf reposync". -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
Try rsync where possible, lftp (mirror feature) where not (that's what I do). -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Dennis Jacobfeuerborn" > To: "CentOS mailing list" > Sent: Tuesday, 27 February, 2018 11:11:29 > Subject: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync > Hi, > I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only > tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. > Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum > config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense > and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata > gets mixed up. > Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them > so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. > > Regards, > Dennis > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Hi, > I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only > tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. > Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum > config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense > and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata > gets mixed up. > Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them > so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. > It is not 'inexplicable'. reposync was primarily built for a user to sync down the repositories they are using to be local.. so using yum.conf makes sense. The fact that it can be used for a lot of other things is built into various configs which the man page covers. As John Hodrien mentioned, you can use the -C flag to point it to a different config file. This is the way to use it if you are wanting to download other files and data. Tools like cobbler wrap the reposync in this fashion. > Regards, > Dennis > ___ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS@centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On 27.02.2018 16:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn > wrote: >> Hi, >> I'm currently trying to mirror a couple of yum repositories and the only >> tool that seems to be available for this is reposync. >> Unfortunately reposync for some inexplicable reason seems to use the yum >> config of the local system as a basis for its work which makes no sense >> and creates all kinds of problems where cache directories and metadata >> gets mixed up. >> Are there any alternatives? Some repos support rsync but not all of them >> so I'm looking for something that works for all repos. >> > > It is not 'inexplicable'. reposync was primarily built for a user to > sync down the repositories they are using to be local.. so using > yum.conf makes sense. The fact that it can be used for a lot of other > things is built into various configs which the man page covers. As > John Hodrien mentioned, you can use the -C flag to point it to a > different config file. This is the way to use it if you are wanting to > download other files and data. Tools like cobbler wrap the reposync in > this fashion. I've been trying to use a custom config file and the -t option to somehow separate the operation of reposync from the systems repositories but this does not seem to work. When I tried to copy a repository reposync reported that it already had a more current repomd.xml than the one offered by the repository. An investigation with strace revealed that reposync still was checking /var/cache/yum for cached files even though i tried both -t and explicitly creating a new directory and using --cachedir. Reposync looks into that cache directory and doesn't find the repomd.xml which is great but then also checks /var/cache/yum where it finds a repomd.xml and uses that. What I mean by inexplicable is that it would make more sense to make reposync a generic tool for syncing yum repos and then simply provide the option to use /etc/yum.conf rather then to hard-code (as is apparently the case) these system specific behaviors. For now what seems to work is using a unique repo name in the config file to make it impossible for reposync to find a matching file in /var/cache/yum but that's more of a hack than a fix for the issue. Regards, Dennis ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Any alternatives for the horrible reposync
On 28 February 2018 at 08:07, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > On 27.02.2018 16:45, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 27 February 2018 at 06:11, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn >> wrote: > What I mean by inexplicable is that it would make more sense to make > reposync a generic tool for syncing yum repos and then simply provide > the option to use /etc/yum.conf rather then to hard-code (as is > apparently the case) these system specific behaviors. > I think that people have been wanting to do that for 12? years now, but no one seems to have actually done so. I don't know if the code is impossible to fix or that everyone keeps assuming someone else will do it for them someday, or a combination of the two.. [developer starts looking to fix the code, and then just decides that it would be better if someone else fixed it for them someday]. > For now what seems to work is using a unique repo name in the config > file to make it impossible for reposync to find a matching file in > /var/cache/yum but that's more of a hack than a fix for the issue. > .. you know I think that is what I do but just didn't think about why I do it. I apologize for not pointing out that hack-fix so you had to rediscover it. > Regards, > Dennis -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos