Re: [CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
On 22/05/13 01:49, Karanbir Singh wrote: On 05/21/2013 10:38 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: I opened bug #6462 ( http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6462 ) to request this... I think this would be a useful feature to have available by default. Thanks, we can perhaps roll that in as is, but with sources being repo specific it can get quite noisy. Overall better goal might be to have a single source repo that then covers the point release and splits as well. Yep. I agree. I was just going to say that a problem with vault is that you have to update the repository location every time the minor version number changes. We really want repositories like vault.centos.org/6/os/Source and vault.centos.org/6/updates/Source. Unless, that is, we can somehow get yum to set up a variable containing a full version number like 6.4. - Toralf - KB This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, forward, copy, print or rely on this e-mail in any way except as permitted by the author. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
On 05/22/2013 08:40 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: I was just going to say that a problem with vault is that you have to update the repository location every time the minor version number changes. We really want repositories like vault.centos.org/6/os/Source and vault.centos.org/6/updates/Source. Unless, that is, we can somehow get yum to set up a variable containing a full version number like 6.4. Because of what and how the /X/ release symlinks work - that url style isnt going to work either. It might beed to be a vault.centos.org/centos/6-sources/ to include the entire distro stuff. Which in turn might just be a meta repo, with urls pointing to the 'usual and normal' paths. Let me look at whats involved to make that happen and we can get a testing repo online; I then need to get something similar up for the yum-security infra to work against the binary rpms side of things ( but is a bigger fish to fry ) Regards -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
Hi. I thought I might set up my CentOS 6 system with a source rpm repository config, so that I'll be able to download srpm files via yumdownloader --source or similar. I'm thinking that in order to this, I have to add something like the following to the yum repos config: [base-source] name=CentOS-$releasever - Base (SRPMS) baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/os/SRPMS gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 #released updates [updates-source] name=CentOS-$releasever - Updates (SRPMS) baseurl=http://mirror.centos.org/centos/$releasever/updates/SRPMS gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-CentOS-6 The question is, what I specify as baseurl? The above does not actually work, as http://mirror.centos.org/ does not have SRPMS subdirectories, although I believe it did in the past for earlier versions. So, does anyone know of URLs I can use instead? Thanks, - Toralf This e-mail, including any attachments and response string, may contain proprietary information which is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is for the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail, please notify the author by return e-mail and delete this message and any attachment immediately. If you are not the intended recipient you must not use, disclose, distribute, forward, copy, print or rely on this e-mail in any way except as permitted by the author. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
On 21.Mai.2013, at 15:53, Toralf Lund wrote: Hi. I thought I might set up my CentOS 6 system with a source rpm repository config, so that I'll be able to download srpm files via yumdownloader --source or similar. … The question is, what I specify as baseurl? The above does not actually work, as http://mirror.centos.org/ does not have SRPMS subdirectories, although I believe it did in the past for earlier versions. So, does anyone know of URLs I can use instead? They moved it into the vault some time ago. http://vault.centos.org -- Markus ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
On 05/21/2013 09:00 AM, Markus Falb wrote: On 21.Mai.2013, at 15:53, Toralf Lund wrote: Hi. I thought I might set up my CentOS 6 system with a source rpm repository config, so that I'll be able to download srpm files via yumdownloader --source or similar. … The question is, what I specify as baseurl? The above does not actually work, as http://mirror.centos.org/ does not have SRPMS subdirectories, although I believe it did in the past for earlier versions. So, does anyone know of URLs I can use instead? They moved it into the vault some time ago. http://vault.centos.org I opened bug #6462 ( http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6462 ) to request this... I think this would be a useful feature to have available by default. -Greg ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CentOS source rpm repository setup
On 05/21/2013 10:38 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: I opened bug #6462 ( http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=6462 ) to request this... I think this would be a useful feature to have available by default. Thanks, we can perhaps roll that in as is, but with sources being repo specific it can get quite noisy. Overall better goal might be to have a single source repo that then covers the point release and splits as well. - KB -- Karanbir Singh +44-207-0999389 | http://www.karan.org/ | twitter.com/kbsingh GnuPG Key : http://www.karan.org/publickey.asc ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
