Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-16 Thread Steve Clark
On 10/15/2013 06:05 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:

 Hi,

 we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load
 average is .07.

 @Steve:
 Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and
That is correct - we do you AES which is an easier calculation than 3DES
 the CPU is handling all the crypto.  Correct?

 @Terre:
 I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms
 of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  And
 there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

 AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an
 integrated crypto accelerator [2].  If it wasn't for your web proxy
 requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS -
 think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching
 right now though.

 [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp
 [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm
 [2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3


 HTH,
 Steve

 On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote:
 I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it.

 Thanks for the info.


 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf
 Of SilverTip257
 Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

 On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter 
 tpor...@webpage-builders.com
 wrote:
 I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at
 building a new one.

 The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with
 Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).

 I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am
 unsure if this will work.

 You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run
 simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.


 I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W
 Eight-Core
 Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?

 Seems like overkill to me.

 I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One of
 those
 mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.

 Just my two cents.


 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Terre


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



 --
 Stephen Clark
 *NetWolves*
 Director of Technology
 Phone: 813-579-3200
 Fax: 813-882-0209
 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
 http://www.netwolves.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





-- 
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-16 Thread Mihamina RKTMB
On 10/15/2013 07:29 PM, Terre Porter wrote:
 I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core
 Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?


Except for HTTP cache, my opinion is an OpenWRT box will do it.
If you need an HDD, I would go for a Lanner with HDD: http://goo.gl/52mXqx

-- 
+261 34 81 738 69

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Terre Porter
I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at
building a new one.

The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with
Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients). 

I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am unsure
if this will work.

I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core
Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?

Any thoughts?

Thanks,
Terre


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter tpor...@webpage-builders.com
 wrote:

 I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at
 building a new one.

 The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with
 Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).

 I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am
 unsure
 if this will work.


You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run
simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.



 I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core
 Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?


Seems like overkill to me.

I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One of those
mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.

Just my two cents.



 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Terre


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Terre Porter
I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it.

Thanks for the info.


-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of SilverTip257
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter tpor...@webpage-builders.com
 wrote:

 I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at 
 building a new one.

 The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with 
 Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).

 I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am 
 unsure if this will work.


You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run
simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.



 I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core
 Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?


Seems like overkill to me.

I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One of those
mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.

Just my two cents.



 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Terre


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Steve Clark
Hi,

we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load
average is .07.

HTH,
Steve

On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote:
 I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it.

 Thanks for the info.


 -Original Message-
 From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
 Of SilverTip257
 Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM
 To: CentOS mailing list
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

 On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter tpor...@webpage-builders.com
 wrote:
 I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at
 building a new one.

 The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with
 Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).

 I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am
 unsure if this will work.

 You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run
 simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.


 I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W Eight-Core
 Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?

 Seems like overkill to me.

 I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One of those
 mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.

 Just my two cents.


 Any thoughts?

 Thanks,
 Terre


 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos





-- 
Stephen Clark
*NetWolves*
Director of Technology
Phone: 813-579-3200
Fax: 813-882-0209
Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
http://www.netwolves.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Fred Smith
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 02:31:03PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
 Hi,
 
 we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load
 average is .07.
 
 HTH,
 Steve

Some years back I used to run Smoothwall/GPL as a home firewall/router
on things such as 90 MHz pentiums (with 64 or even 128 MB RAM), or at
one point a 500 MHz AMD K6, and it had no load problems at all handling
the 3 or 4 of us here who share the household LAN. Therefore I'd think
that something such as an Atom would be entirely up to the task. There
are a number of (relatively) inexpensive Atom boards in a Micro-ATX or
Mini-ATX format that you could use, for example.

Fred

-- 
---
 .Fred Smith   /  
( /__  ,__.   __   __ /  __   : / 
 //  /   /__) /  /  /__) .+'   Home: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
//  (__ (___ (__(_ (___ / :__ 781-438-5471 
 Jude 1:24,25 -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread SilverTip257
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:

 Hi,

 we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load
 average is .07.


@Steve:
Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and
the CPU is handling all the crypto.  Correct?

@Terre:
I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms
of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  And
there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an
integrated crypto accelerator [2].  If it wasn't for your web proxy
requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS -
think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching
right now though.

[0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp
[1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm
[2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3



 HTH,
 Steve

 On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote:
  I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it.
 
  Thanks for the info.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
 Behalf
  Of SilverTip257
  Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM
  To: CentOS mailing list
  Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
 
  On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter 
 tpor...@webpage-builders.com
  wrote:
  I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking at
  building a new one.
 
  The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with
  Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).
 
  I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I am
  unsure if this will work.
 
  You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to run
  simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.
 
 
  I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W
 Eight-Core
  Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?
 
  Seems like overkill to me.
 
  I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One of
 those
  mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.
 
  Just my two cents.
 
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  Thanks,
  Terre
 
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 
 


 --
 Stephen Clark
 *NetWolves*
 Director of Technology
 Phone: 813-579-3200
 Fax: 813-882-0209
 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
 http://www.netwolves.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




-- 
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread S.Tindall
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 18:05 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote:

 @Steve:
 Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and
 the CPU is handling all the crypto.  Correct?

 @Terre:
 I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms
 of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  And
 there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

 AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an
 integrated crypto accelerator [2].  If it wasn't for your web proxy
 requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS -
 think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching
 right now though.
 
 [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp
 [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm
 [2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3

You should look at the single board computers sold by Soekris
Engineering.

 http://soekris.com

Specifically the net6501 series:

 http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html

 Specifications:

  •  600 Mhz to 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom E6xx single chip processor
 with EG20T companion chip 
  •  512 to 2048 Mbyte DDR2-SDRAM, soldered on board 
  •  2x SATA 3 Gbit interfaces with +5V and +12V power header
  •  4x Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet ports, Auto-MDIX RJ-45,
 protected to 700W/40A Surge 
  •  2x Serial ports, DB9 and 10 pins internal header
  •  USB 2.0 interface, 2x internal, 1x external port, bootable 
  •  1 Full Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket.
  •  1 USB only Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket
  •  2x PCI Express Slots, right angle 
  •  16 bit general purpose I/O, 24 pins header, connected to FPGA

...in either a tiny or a rackable box.

The number of lan slots can be increased above 4 by using expansion
cards.

Steve



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Terre Porter
Interesting looking hardware... thanks for the info

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of 
S.Tindall
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:29 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 18:05 -0400, SilverTip257 wrote:

 @Steve:
 Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator 
 and the CPU is handling all the crypto.  Correct?

 @Terre:
 I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in 
 terms of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  
 And there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

 AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an 
 integrated crypto accelerator [2].  If it wasn't for your web proxy 
 requirements, etc an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded 
 OS - think Voyage Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're 
 researching right now though.
 
 [0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp
 [1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm
 [2] 
 http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3

You should look at the single board computers sold by Soekris Engineering.

 http://soekris.com

Specifically the net6501 series:

 http://soekris.com/products/net6501.html

 Specifications:

  •  600 Mhz to 1.6 Ghz Intel Atom E6xx single chip processor
 with EG20T companion chip
  •  512 to 2048 Mbyte DDR2-SDRAM, soldered on board
  •  2x SATA 3 Gbit interfaces with +5V and +12V power header
  •  4x Intel 82574L Gigabit Ethernet ports, Auto-MDIX RJ-45,
 protected to 700W/40A Surge
  •  2x Serial ports, DB9 and 10 pins internal header
  •  USB 2.0 interface, 2x internal, 1x external port, bootable
  •  1 Full Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket.
  •  1 USB only Mini-PCI Express shared with mSATA socket
  •  2x PCI Express Slots, right angle
  •  16 bit general purpose I/O, 24 pins header, connected to FPGA

...in either a tiny or a rackable box.

The number of lan slots can be increased above 4 by using expansion cards.

Steve



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread Terre Porter
I have must have been in a hardware vacuum, have a clue any of that hardware
you mentioned.

Added it to the research list - haha!

Thanks

-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of SilverTip257
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 6:05 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:

 Hi,

 we are running 51 ipsec vpns on an Atom D510 at 1.66ghz and the load 
 average is .07.


@Steve:
Based on your statement, I figure you do not have a crypto accelerator and
the CPU is handling all the crypto.  Correct?

@Terre:
I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms
of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  And there's
the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

AMD Geode CPUs like those in PC Engines ALIX [1] hardware have an integrated
crypto accelerator [2].  If it wasn't for your web proxy requirements, etc
an ALIX might fit the bill (with the right embedded OS - think Voyage
Linux). You're better off with the hardware you're researching right now
though.

[0] http://www.via.com.tw/en/initiatives/padlock/hardware.jsp
[1] http://www.pcengines.ch/alix.htm
[2] http://www.twam.info/hardware/alix/using-geodes-aes-engine-on-alix3d3



 HTH,
 Steve

 On 10/15/2013 02:13 PM, Terre Porter wrote:
  I've not worked with Atom processors but I'll look in to it.
 
  Thanks for the info.
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] 
  On
 Behalf
  Of SilverTip257
  Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 12:36 PM
  To: CentOS mailing list
  Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question
 
  On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Terre Porter 
 tpor...@webpage-builders.com
  wrote:
  I've given up on getting the other machine to work so I'm looking 
  at building a new one.
 
  The machine will be a firewall/gateway running NAT, Web Proxy with 
  Dansguardian, DHCP, DNS, NTP and VPN (~6 clients).
 
  I read so much about VPN encryption and the processor needs, now I 
  am unsure if this will work.
 
  You'll likely need to determine how many VPN tunnels you're going to 
  run simultaneously and then find benchmarks on the web.
 
 
  I can get this for AMD FX-8120 Zambezi 3.1GHz Socket AM3+ 125W
 Eight-Core
  Desktop Processor for under $120 (it's on sale), would it work ?
 
  Seems like overkill to me.
 
  I'd suggest more along the lines of an Atom-CPU based system.  One 
  of
 those
  mini-ITX setups that use 20W or thereabouts.
 
  Just my two cents.
 
 
  Any thoughts?
 
  Thanks,
  Terre
 
 
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 
 


 --
 Stephen Clark
 *NetWolves*
 Director of Technology
 Phone: 813-579-3200
 Fax: 813-882-0209
 Email: steve.cl...@netwolves.com
 http://www.netwolves.com
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




--
---~~.~~---
Mike
//  SilverTip257  //
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Firewall/Gateway Hardware Question

2013-10-15 Thread John R Pierce
On 10/15/2013 3:05 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
 I don't know how VIA C7 CPUs stack up against the Intel Atom CPUs in terms
 of performance, but they're low power consuming x86 processors.  And
 there's the VIA Padlock [0] security/encryption engine.

I think the Atoms pretty much beat the living daylights out of the C7 
stuff, which were based on an architecture many generations old. some of 
the core I3/i5 laptop chips are very low power, too, and nearly as 
powerful as modern 2-4 core desktop processors..the current 
'Pentiums' are somewhere in between the Atom and the low end of the Core 
line.



-- 
john r pierce  37N 122W
somewhere on the middle of the left coast

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos