RE: [CentOS] Re: DKIM - Read Yahoo's FAQ

2008-09-25 Thread Josh Donovan
Bob Hoffman wrote:

 Um, no one has ignored yahoos mail practices.
 My server is set up correctly.
 I even took the step of adding spf.
 I talked to others with the same issue that use dkim
 It is still grey listed.
 
 After talking with yahoo, they indicate the change of ip
 addresses/server/hostname as main indicator.
 They asked for the old and the new ips, server, hostname to
 verify.
 
 But of course you do not read.
 
 So, you can stick your childishness up you arse and kiss
 mine while you are
 at it.

Looking at the headers of the mail you have just sent from a
yahoo client you have not followed to the letter Yahoo's 
requirements 4-7. 

http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-September/065243.html

Feel free to use the Contact Yahoo Customer Care button below the 
FAQ. Stop being belligerent on a public mailing list. People have 
issues other than Yahoo mail to discuss.

Thanks,
Josh.






___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


RE: [CentOS] Re: DKIM - Read Yahoo's FAQ

2008-09-25 Thread Bob Hoffman
 
Josh wrote

Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being 
able to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's 
FAQ's and then this kind of BS.

 Looking at the headers of the mail you have just sent from a 
 yahoo client you have not followed to the letter Yahoo's 
 requirements 4-7. 


 

4- consistent headers- there is nothing wrong with the headers. ...check.
5- can spam act..went there, nothing in my headers or mail suggests it
..check
6- mail authentication- no domain keys here, yahoo does not require except
for bulk mailings, as per their faqs, spf and dkim taken off as useless and
mail breaking.
7- reverse dns- not a dynamic ip...check.



So...we agree to disagree that each thinks the other does not know what is
happening.
Lets leave it at that.



Although your email headers have issues.might want to look into that
localhost 127.0.0.1 thing. That is a red flag. All those different
mailservers from the same domain. Golly.

Received: from n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
[87.248.110.144])   
Received: from [217.146.182.177] by n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with
NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [87.248.110.117] by t3.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp222.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [79.65.135.77] by web28215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 GMT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
From: Josh Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: DKIM - Read Yahoo's FAQ

2008-09-25 Thread Scott Silva

on 9-25-2008 5:21 AM Bob Hoffman spake the following:
 
Josh wrote


Agreed! Its amazing to see the childishness of not being 
able to get one's server in order, ignoring Yahoo's 
FAQ's and then this kind of BS.


Looking at the headers of the mail you have just sent from a 
yahoo client you have not followed to the letter Yahoo's 
requirements 4-7. 



 


4- consistent headers- there is nothing wrong with the headers. ...check.
5- can spam act..went there, nothing in my headers or mail suggests it
..check
6- mail authentication- no domain keys here, yahoo does not require except
for bulk mailings, as per their faqs, spf and dkim taken off as useless and
mail breaking.
7- reverse dns- not a dynamic ip...check.



So...we agree to disagree that each thinks the other does not know what is
happening.
Lets leave it at that.



Although your email headers have issues.might want to look into that
localhost 127.0.0.1 thing. That is a red flag. All those different
mailservers from the same domain. Golly.

Received: from n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com
[87.248.110.144])   
Received: from [217.146.182.177] by n27.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with
NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [87.248.110.117] by t3.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp222.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 -
Received: from [79.65.135.77] by web28215.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:07:03 GMT
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.218.2
From: Josh Donovan [EMAIL PROTECTED]


An entry from localhost is very common on a webmail server. It shouldn't break 
anything, it is just a relay.



--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: DKIM - Read Yahoo's FAQ

2008-09-25 Thread Josh Donovan
Scott Silva wrote:

 An entry from localhost is very common on a webmail server. It shouldn't 
 break anything, it is just a relay.

Enough time has been wasted on the DKIM thread so I'm not reading the main 
thread but what was Hoffman thinking looking up my headers on a webmail 
client? I'm not the one sending Yahoo email from a home server. Its crystal 
clear what needs to be done. Wait till he sends mail to AOL or Hotmail.

Thanks,
Josh.




___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos