Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric rpm

2008-07-27 Thread MHR
Would you please trim your replies?

Thank you.

mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: Gnumeric rpm

2008-07-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Iain Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Paul,

 Thanks your contribution, I too miss gnumeric. However, I get these errors
 and the installed gnumeric crashes on opening a gnumeric file:

 =
  Package Arch   Version  RepositorySize
 =
 Installing:
  gnumerici386   1:1.8.2-2Centos5.2pj  kups  12 M
 Installing for dependencies:
  goffice i386   0.6.2-1Centos5.2pj  kups   1.4 M

 Transaction Summary
 =
 Install  2 Package(s)
 Update   0 Package(s)
 Remove   0 Package(s)

 Total download size: 13 M
 Is this ok [y/N]: y
 Downloading Packages:
 Running rpm_check_debug
 Running Transaction Test
 Finished Transaction Test
 Transaction Test Succeeded
 Running Transaction
  Installing: goffice  # [1/2]
  Installing: gnumeric # [2/2]
 I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
 http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:138: parser error : Entity
 'nbsp' not defined
Protrademark/nbsp;and HTML. gnum;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:139: parser error : Entity
 'nbsp' not defined
can save files to several versions of the MS
 Exceltrademark/nbsp;file

 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:467: parser error : Entity
 'nbsp' not defined
The file format used by the Microsoft Exceltrademark/nbsp;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:644: parser error : chunk is
 not well balanced

 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:408: parser error : Failure to
 process entity welcome
welcome;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:408: parser error : Entity
 'welcome' not defined
welcome;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1776: parser error : Entity
 'hellip' not defined
hellip; /guimenuitem/menuchoice.  This brings up the file
^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1810: parser error : Entity
 'hellip' not defined
hellip;/guimenuitem/menuchoice.  The interface Auto
^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/quick-start.xml:1934: parser error : chunk
 is not well balanced

 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:474: parser error : Failure to
 process entity quick-start
quick-start;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gnumeric.xml:474: parser error : Entity
 'quick-start' not defined
quick-start;
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:168: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemNew/guimenuitem mdash; Create a new
  ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:179: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemOpen.../guimenuitem mdash; The
  ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:205: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemSave/guimenuitem mdash; The
   ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:217: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemSave As.../guimenuitem mdash; The
 ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:250: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemPage Setup.../guimenuitem mdash; The
^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:261: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemPrint.../guimenuitem mdash; The
   ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:273: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemPrint Preview.../guimenuitem mdash; The
   ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:305: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
 guimenuitemSend To.../guimenuitem mdash; The
  ^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:317: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined
guimenuitemProperties.../guimenuitem mdash; The
^
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/gui-menus.xml:329: parser error : Entity
 'mdash' not defined

[CentOS] Re: Gnumeric rpm

2008-07-26 Thread Paul Johnson
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Paul Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 10:13 AM, Iain Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Paul,

 Thanks your contribution, I too miss gnumeric. However, I get these errors
 and the installed gnumeric crashes on opening a gnumeric file:

 =
  Package Arch   Version  RepositorySize
 =
 Installing:
  gnumerici386   1:1.8.2-2Centos5.2pj  kups  12 M
 Installing for dependencies:
  goffice i386   0.6.2-1Centos5.2pj  kups   1.4 M

 Transaction Summary
 =
 Install  2 Package(s)
 Update   0 Package(s)
 Remove   0 Package(s)

 Total download size: 13 M
 Is this ok [y/N]: y
 Downloading Packages:
 Running rpm_check_debug
 Running Transaction Test
 Finished Transaction Test
 Transaction Test Succeeded
 Running Transaction
  Installing: goffice  # [1/2]
  Installing: gnumeric # [2/2]
 I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
 http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/xml/4.3/docbookx.dtd
 /usr/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/welcome.xml:138: parser error : Entity
 'nbsp' not defined
Protrademark/nbsp;and HTML. gnum;
 ^

Dear Iain:

I've been googling more, found redhat bugzilla on the I/O error and
network entity:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440295

Are you by chance running the Server version of Centos 5.2 with the
mis-matched versions of Dockbook mentioned in this bug report?

That would explain the trouble you see.  I don't get that same error
you see, so I can't say for sure if a system update does fix it.  But
it appears it might.  I think also you should consider installing the
gnome-doc-utils package I have, and check your xlst packages:

$ rpm -qa | grep xsl
libxslt-devel-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1
openoffice.org-xsltfilter-2.3.0-6.5.1.el5_2
docbook-style-xsl-1.69.1-5.1
libxslt-1.1.17-2.el5_1.1


pj


-- 
Paul E. Johnson
Professor, Political Science
1541 Lilac Lane, Room 504
University of Kansas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-03-22 Thread Primorec
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Primorec wrote:
  I've checked today here
 
  Extras Testing:
  i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/
  x86_64
  Sources
 
  Could not find gnumeric (yet).
 
  Am I looking into the right repository ?
 

 That is indeed the right place - only, I've been shuffing machines and
 drives around setting up some stuff in the DC. So the next push should
 have the packages.


The 'gnumeric' problem for  the CentOS5.x is solved. There are  2 solutions
available.
Both of them work.
SOLUTION A)  (thanks to Michael A.P.)
wget
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/epel/5/i386/epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm
wget
http://yellowjacketlinux.fileburst.com/yum/yjl/el5/yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.noarch.rpm
rpm -i epel-release-5-2.noarch.rpm
rpm -i yjl-repo-1-3.el5_1.yjl.0.noarch.rpm
enable  yjl-misc in  /etc/yum.repos.d/yjl.repo
yum install gnumeric

SOLUTION B)  (found via google on Scientific Linux)
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01563.html

repo file:

$ cat /etc/yum.repos.d/pjsl.repo


[pjsl]
name=PJ SL rpms
baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/$basearch/
enabled=1



[pjsl-source]
name=PJ SL Linux 5 - $basearch - Source
baseurl=http://pj.freefaculty.org/ScientificLinux/5/SRPMS
enabled=0
#gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-EPEL
#gpgcheck=1



Good luck

Igor










-- 
Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted.
Randy Pausch
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-03-01 Thread Primorec
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in
  the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.

I've checked today here

Extras Testing:
i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/
x86_64
Sources

Could not find gnumeric (yet).

Am I looking into the right repository ?

Igor

P.S.  as of today  March 1st, latest builds are  (no gnumeric)

libprelude-python-0.9.16.2-1.el5.kb.i386.rpm16-Feb-2008 14:28   
180K
[ ] mysql-proxy-0.6.1-1.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 01:51   81K
[ ] qemu-0.9.1-3.el5.kb.1.i386.rpm  28-Feb-2008 01:51   9.6M
[ ] qemu-0.9.1-3.el5.kb.1.i686.rpm  28-Feb-2008 01:51   9.6M
[ ] pam_mysql-0.7-0.5.rc1.el5.kb.2.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:02   38K
[ ] straw-0.27-12.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:27   504K
[ ] pure-ftpd-1.0.21-15.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:32   236K
[ ] pure-ftpd-selinux-1.0.21-15.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 02:32   
12K
[ ] ipython-0.8.2-1.el5.kb.noarch.rpm   28-Feb-2008 02:35   1.7M
[ ] pyparsing-1.4.7-1.el5.kb.noarch.rpm 28-Feb-2008 19:08   810K
[ ] pydot-0.9.10-5.el5.kb.noarch.rpm28-Feb-2008 19:14   45K
[ ] python-psycopg-1.1.21-7.el5.kb.i386.rpm 28-Feb-2008 19:40   123K
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-03-01 Thread Karanbir Singh

Primorec wrote:

I've checked today here

Extras Testing:
i386 = http://centos.karan.org/el5/extras/testing/i386/RPMS/
x86_64
Sources

Could not find gnumeric (yet).

Am I looking into the right repository ?



That is indeed the right place - only, I've been shuffing machines and 
drives around setting up some stuff in the DC. So the next push should 
have the packages.


--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-28 Thread Karanbir Singh

Primorec wrote:


P.S.  Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the future ?


I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in 
the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.


- KB

--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-28 Thread Primorec
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 6:05 AM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Primorec wrote:
  
   P.S.  Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the 
 future ?

  I've added it to the buildqueue a few minues back, it should show up in
  the testing C5 repo either later today or in the morning tomorrow.

wow wow wow  I am flabbergasted  ...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-27 Thread Primorec
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 on 2/27/2008 2:24 PM Primorec spake the following:
 
 
  On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 2:02 PM, Karanbir Singh
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a yum repository that has them or a yum repository for
gnumeric?
   
 
  I have a snapshot of gnumeric in my Misc repository ( for i386 only
 so
  far, x86_64 and ppc coming soon ). Repo Setup instructions are
 included
  on the start page ( http://centos.karan.org/ ). You will need both
 the
  Misc and FExtras repo's setup.
 
  yum install gnumeric should then do the magic.
 
 
  somehow  it does not work for me...  I am not able to find  the FExtra
  .repo file
 
 Did you follow instructions on the webpage? ( http://centos.karan.org/ )


Yes, I did.   On that page is written (among other things):

...
  There are two repositories hosted here, the Fedora Extras rebuilt for
CentOS and the Misc pkg. The Misc pkg tree includes various rpms that I have
built from source or src.rpm rebuilds. There might be pkgs there that will
overwrite / replace core pkgs included in CentOS. To use the Misc Pkgs
repository, you will need the FExtras repo enabled as well, some of the
dependencies are resolved there.
..

There is nowhere to find .repo file for  FExtras.I am assuming that
this  
kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repohttp://centos.karan.org/kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repo
is the correct .repo file for FExtras.
And, I am assuming that this
kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repohttp://centos.karan.org/kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repo
is the .repo file for Misc Pkgs.

So, I've installed both .repo files into /etc/yum.repos.d/

Here is the list. As you can see there IS the karan (kbsingh) repo file(s)
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Media.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-fasttrack.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/epel-testing.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/kbsingh-CentOS-Extras.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/kbsingh-CentOS-Misc.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/mirrors-rpmforge
/etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo

Once everything was in place I've typed:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum install gnumeric
Loading installonlyn plugin
Loading priorities plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
epel  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
kbs-CentOS-Extras 100% |=|  951 B00:00
fasttrack 100% |=|  951 B00:00
rpmforge  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
base  100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
updates   100% |=|  951 B00:00
kbs-CentOS-Misc   100% |=|  951 B00:00
addons100% |=|  951 B00:00
extras100% |=| 1.1 kB00:00
Reading repository metadata in from local files
0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do

Here I am now.  I do not know how to procede from here.

Any help is very welcome

Igor
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-27 Thread Karanbir Singh

Primorec wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum install gnumeric
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do

Here I am now.  I do not know how to procede from here.


What arch are you running ?

--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/  : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-27 Thread Primorec
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Primorec wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum install gnumeric

  Parsing package install arguments
  Nothing to do
 
  Here I am now.  I do not know how to procede from here.

 What arch are you running ?

Is this the correct answer ?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# uname -a
Linux legolas.?.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20
EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

-- 
Experience is what you get when you didn't get what you wanted.

  Randy Pausch
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


[CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-27 Thread Scott Silva

on 2/27/2008 4:38 PM Scott Silva spake the following:

on 2/27/2008 4:31 PM Primorec spake the following:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh 
mail-lists-XASut8F7j/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Primorec wrote:

[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum install gnumeric
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do

Here I am now.  I do not know how to procede from here.

What arch are you running ?


Is this the correct answer ?

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# uname -a
Linux legolas.?.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20
EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux


Karanbir said they were available for CentOS 4.
It looks like you have 5.

Correction---
The original poster asked for CentOS 4 and Karanbir replied on availability.
I don't see it for CentOS 5, not even in testing or source there.

--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] Re: Gnumeric

2008-02-27 Thread Primorec
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 on 2/27/2008 4:38 PM Scott Silva spake the following:

  on 2/27/2008 4:31 PM Primorec spake the following:
   On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Karanbir Singh
   mail-lists-XASut8F7j/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  wrote:
   Primorec wrote:
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum install gnumeric
   Parsing package install arguments
   Nothing to do
  
   Here I am now.  I do not know how to procede from here.
   What arch are you running ?
  
   Is this the correct answer ?
  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] downloads]# uname -a
   Linux legolas.?.com 2.6.18-53.1.6.el5 #1 SMP Wed Jan 23 11:30:20
   EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
  
   Karanbir said they were available for CentOS 4.
   It looks like you have 5.
  Correction---
  The original poster asked for CentOS 4 and Karanbir replied on availability.
  I don't see it for CentOS 5, not even in testing or source there.


I stand corrected.

Igor

P.S.  Karanbir, will gnumeric be included into the repository in the future ?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos