RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Hatton wrote: I have rpms for 1.0.0 / Centos4 stored here - which I can make available to you if you need? Although I see Axelis going to produce a fix very soon now so maybe you won't need them. Let me know Thanks, Dave, but I'll just wait for the updated update from the Axe-man. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: I found a bug in the pam_stack autodetection part of the specfile. This can explain any authentication issues with dovecot on CentOS4 and 3 (5 is safe). There will be 1.0.1-1_58 very soon to fix this, thanks for spotting this! Ha! See? My ex-wife was wrong. I really AM good for something. ;-) I was just daydreaming recently on when I found my first "Linux Bug". I remember it was something fairly trivial that most people weren't affected by, just me and that idiotic 386SX I had. This must have been, what, still in the 0.12 days 'cause I remember using HJ Lu's Boot/Root floppies (the 5.25" buggers). Ah, the memories... But back to reality; I am always happy to help in any way I can. Joe -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
>> I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet. >> >> I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well. >> >> I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was > planning some research tomorrow. >> >> Hope this helps. > > It does. I was just thinking of trying that so I'll give it a shot and see what happens. I do wish yum had a facility for >downgrading versions. > > I just did a search on atrpms stable for dovecot and it's no longer there. There is a dovecot-sieve rpm. I had to downgrade all >the way back to 0.99.11-8.EL4 from the base repo to get things working again. I have rpms for 1.0.0 / Centos4 stored here - which I can make available to you if you need? Although I see Axelis going to produce a fix very soon now so maybe you won't need them. Let me know Daveh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Dave Hatton wrote: I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet. I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well. I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was planning some research tomorrow. Hope this helps. It does. I was just thinking of trying that so I'll give it a shot and see what happens. I do wish yum had a facility for downgrading versions. I just did a search on atrpms stable for dovecot and it's no longer there. There is a dovecot-sieve rpm. I had to downgrade all the way back to 0.99.11-8.EL4 from the base repo to get things working again. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
Joe Klemmer spake the following on 6/18/2007 2:13 PM:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> Do you have a /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew?
>> Maybe you need to diff the files and see if something changed.
>
> No .rpmnew or .rpmold or any variation.
>
>> If you were running 0.99 from stock CentOS before the upgrade, then
>> you definitely need to fix your config file.
>
> I was running 0.99 something (whatever was in base). Is there
> something specific I need to look for? This is the current content of
> the conf file (excluding comments) -
>
> --8<--8<--
>
> protocol imap {
>
> }
>
>
> protocol pop3 {
>
> }
>
>
> protocol lda {
> postmaster_address = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> }
>
>
> auth default {
> mechanisms = plain
>
> passdb pam {
> }
>
> userdb passwd {
> }
>
> user = root
>
> }
>
>
> dict {
> }
>
>
> plugin {
>
> }
>
> --8<--8<--
>
>
> --
> Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe
> See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk
If you were using the default config file from 0.99, you can get by with the
default on Axel's rpm. You just need to make sure that your protocols (pop3
and/or imap) are enabled if needed.
--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as 1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me (or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather. (Until now I though you were running 0.99.x previously) No, it was with the 0.99 version. I had just noticed that there was a slightly older version on atrpms (1.0.0-8_56.el4.at) so I was looking to downgrade to it and see what happens. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 07:18:55PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:09:06PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > > > >Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version > > >as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not > > >maintained by the author anymore. See > > > > > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot > > > Maybe dropping back to 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at might be worth a test. I may try > > that later today. > > Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as > 1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me > (or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather. > > (Until now I though you were running 0.99.x previously) I found a bug in the pam_stack autodetection part of the specfile. This can explain any authentication issues with dovecot on CentOS4 and 3 (5 is safe). There will be 1.0.1-1_58 very soon to fix this, thanks for spotting this! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpYc00pWNN1N.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote:
Do you have a /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew?
Maybe you need to diff the files and see if something changed.
No .rpmnew or .rpmold or any variation.
If you were running 0.99 from stock CentOS before the upgrade, then you
definitely need to fix your config file.
I was running 0.99 something (whatever was in base). Is there
something specific I need to look for? This is the current content of the
conf file (excluding comments) -
--8<--8<--
protocol imap {
}
protocol pop3 {
}
protocol lda {
postmaster_address = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
auth default {
mechanisms = plain
passdb pam {
}
userdb passwd {
}
user = root
}
dict {
}
plugin {
}
--8<--8<--
--
Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe
See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
I've had a similar problem that I haven't been able to resolve yet. I downgraded to dovecot 1.0.0 (from atrpms) and all is well. I think that the authentication methods are changing and I was planning some research tomorrow. Hope this helps. daveh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:12:32PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >>$ rpm -V dovecot > >>. c /etc/dovecot.conf > > > >This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been > >modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under > >/etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. > > That's right, I did change the example email address from > "example.com" to "webtrek.com" in the "protocol lda" section but that > shouldn't hurt anything, should it? No, certainly not :) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpNNyepimRaX.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:09:06PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version > >as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not > >maintained by the author anymore. See > > > > http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot > Maybe dropping back to 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at might be worth a test. I may try > that later today. Was that the previous version? If so then the breakage is serious, as 1.0.1 is considered a stable bugfix release over 1.0.0. Please feed me (or directly the dovecot list) with any information you can gather. (Until now I though you were running 0.99.x previously) -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpgL0A5mILhq.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: $ rpm -V dovecot . c /etc/dovecot.conf This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. That's right, I did change the example email address from "example.com" to "webtrek.com" in the "protocol lda" section but that shouldn't hurt anything, should it? -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
Joe Klemmer spake the following on 6/18/2007 9:30 AM: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? >>> >>> As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? >> >> A good thing definitely. :) >> >> What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q >> dovecot saying? > > $ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 > > I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if that > makes a difference. > > -- > Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe > See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk Do you have a /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew? Maybe you need to diff the files and see if something changed. If you were running 0.99 from stock CentOS before the upgrade, then you definitely need to fix your config file. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version
as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not
maintained by the author anymore. See
http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot
Just for grins I did a yum search for all the available versions
of dovecot and this is what I get back -
$ yum search dovecot | grep ^dovecot | awk 'NF == 3 {print $0}'
dovecot.i386 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at atrpms
dovecot-devel.i386 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at atrpms
dovecot-sieve.i386 1.0.1-5.el4.at atrpms
dovecot.i386 1.0.1-1_57.el4 atrpms
dovecot-devel.i386 1.0.1-1_57.el4 atrpms
dovecot-sieve.i386 1.0.1-5.1.el4 atrpms
dovecot.i386 0.99.11-8.EL4 base
dovecot.i386 0.99.11-4.EL4 sl-release
dovecot.i386 1.0.1-1_57.el4 installed
Maybe dropping back to 1.0.0-8_56.el4.at might be worth a test. I may try
that later today.
--
Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe
See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:02:07PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > No config changes were made, just 'yum update'. No *.rpmnew files > that I can find. Running rpm -V gives - > > $ rpm -V dovecot > . c /etc/dovecot.conf This output means that /etc/dovecot.conf was modified. If it had been modified before the upgrade then the new config file lands under /etc/dovecot.conf.rpmnew. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpY7rud8jzwI.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: $ rpm -q dovecot dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 That's an ATrpms version (living in atrpms-testing). Hmm, I don't have the atrpms-testing repo enabled. I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if that makes a difference. Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not maintained by the author anymore. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot I know, I've already run into the issue of needing to fix/clear out the index bug. for details. If you were using the default config nothing really affects you, but since you have troubles there must be something changed. Also check with rpm -V dovecot whether the config files are changed and whether you have *.rpmnew files instead. No config changes were made, just 'yum update'. No *.rpmnew files that I can find. Running rpm -V gives - $ rpm -V dovecot . c /etc/dovecot.conf I have done a service restart for it just to make sure nothing was hung or something. Have I mentioned recently how much I hate computers? :-P -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other (semi)interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:30:14PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: > > >>>Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? > >> > >>As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? > > > >A good thing definitely. :) > > > >What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q > >dovecot saying? > > $ rpm -q dovecot > dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 That's an ATrpms version (living in atrpms-testing). > I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if > that makes a difference. Personally I would recommend fixing the above, as the dovecot version as shipped by the upstream vendor (0.99.11 from 2004) is not maintained by the author anymore. See http://wiki.dovecot.org/UpgradingDovecot for details. If you were using the default config nothing really affects you, but since you have troubles there must be something changed. Also check with rpm -V dovecot whether the config files are changed and whether you have *.rpmnew files instead. -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgprkg5uPgDOJ.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:07:32PM -0400, Joe Klemmer wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote: > > >>Anyone run into this? I was planning to upgrade the box to CentOS 5 > >>next month but I may do it sooner if it will fix this. > > > >Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? > > As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? A good thing definitely. :) What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q dovecot saying? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpdnAhnn3Ajf.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Axel Thimm wrote: Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? A good thing definitely. :) What version of dovecot is now on your system? E.g. what's rpm -q dovecot saying? $ rpm -q dovecot dovecot-1.0.1-1_57.el4 I was thinking of dropping back to an earlier version to see if that makes a difference. -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Scott Silva wrote: Anyone run into this? I was planning to upgrade the box to CentOS 5 next month but I may do it sooner if it will fix this. Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? As it happens, yes. Is this a good thing or a bad thing? -- Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Upgrade of dovecot broke imap (CentOS 4.5)
Joe Klemmer spake the following on 6/17/2007 6:00 PM: > > I just did a yum update and one of the packages updated was > dovecot. I've been using this for imap/pop3 for quite a while. Now, > however, I get an error when trying to login under any account. It > gives "bad user or password" errors for every user. The user can ssh in > just fine and run mutt or pine. But trying to get in with evolution, or > even squirrelmail, just gives me an evil laugh and the finger. > > Anyone run into this? I was planning to upgrade the box to CentOS 5 > next month but I may do it sooner if it will fix this. > > Thanks, > Joe > > P.S. Please CC: me directly if you can as mail reading is, obviously, > not cooperating with me. > > -- > Boring Home Page - http://www.webtrek.com/joe > See my blog, sumo game ranks and other interesting junk Do you by any chance have atrpms enabled as a repo? -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
